1
|
Zelek WM, Harrison RA. Complement and COVID-19: Three years on, what we know, what we don't know, and what we ought to know. Immunobiology 2023; 228:152393. [PMID: 37187043 PMCID: PMC10174470 DOI: 10.1016/j.imbio.2023.152393] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/25/2023] [Revised: 05/05/2023] [Accepted: 05/08/2023] [Indexed: 05/17/2023]
Abstract
The severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) virus was identified in China in 2019 as the causative agent of COVID-19, and quickly spread throughout the world, causing over 7 million deaths, of which 2 million occurred prior to the introduction of the first vaccine. In the following discussion, while recognising that complement is just one of many players in COVID-19, we focus on the relationship between complement and COVID-19 disease, with limited digression into directly-related areas such as the relationship between complement, kinin release, and coagulation. Prior to the 2019 COVID-19 outbreak, an important role for complement in coronavirus diseases had been established. Subsequently, multiple investigations of patients with COVID-19 confirmed that complement dysregulation is likely to be a major driver of disease pathology, in some, if not all, patients. These data fuelled evaluation of many complement-directed therapeutic agents in small patient cohorts, with claims of significant beneficial effect. As yet, these early results have not been reflected in larger clinical trials, posing questions such as who to treat, appropriate time to treat, duration of treatment, and optimal target for treatment. While significant control of the pandemic has been achieved through a global scientific and medical effort to comprehend the etiology of the disease, through extensive SARS-CoV-2 testing and quarantine measures, through vaccine development, and through improved therapy, possibly aided by attenuation of the dominant strains, it is not yet over. In this review, we summarise complement-relevant literature, emphasise its main conclusions, and formulate a hypothesis for complement involvement in COVID-19. Based on this we make suggestions as to how any future outbreak might be better managed in order to minimise impact on patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wioleta M Zelek
- Dementia Research Institute and Division of Infection and Immunity, School of Medicine, Cardiff University, Cardiff, United Kingdom
| | | |
Collapse
|
2
|
Olfactory and gustatory disorders in COVID-19. ALLERGO JOURNAL INTERNATIONAL 2022; 31:243-250. [PMID: 35755859 PMCID: PMC9208356 DOI: 10.1007/s40629-022-00216-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/14/2022] [Accepted: 04/28/2022] [Indexed: 12/05/2022]
Abstract
Loss of olfaction is one of the symptoms most commonly reported by patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Although the spontaneous recovery rate is high, recent studies have shown that up to 7% of patients remain anosmic for more than 12 months after the onset of infection, leaving millions of people worldwide suffering from severe olfactory impairment. Olfactory training remains the first recommended treatment. With the continued lack of approved drug treatments, new therapeutic options are being explored. This article reviews the current state of science on COVID-19-related olfactory disorders, focusing on epidemiology, pathophysiology, cure rates, currently available treatment options, and research on new treatments.
Collapse
|
3
|
Klimek L, Hagemann J, Döge J, Koll L, Cuevas M, Klimek F, Hummel T. Störungen des Riech- und Schmeckvermögens bei COVID-19. ALLERGO JOURNAL 2022; 31:35-43. [PMCID: PMC9618349 DOI: 10.1007/s15007-022-5602-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/06/2022]
Abstract
Der Verlust des Riechvermögens ist eines der Symptome, die von Patienten mit COVID-19 mit am häufigsten angegeben werden. Obwohl die Spontanheilungsrate hoch ist, haben neuere Studien gezeigt, dass bis zu 7 % der Patienten mehr als zwölf Monate nach Beginn der Infektion anosmisch bleiben, sodass weltweit Millionen von Menschen unter schweren Riechstörungen leiden. Riechtraining ist nach wie vor die erste empfohlene Behandlungsform. Angesichts weiterhin fehlender zugelassener medikamentöser Behandlungsmöglichkeiten werden neue therapeutische Optionen erforscht. Dieser Artikel gibt einen Überblick über den aktuellen Stand der Wissenschaft zu COVID-19-bedingten Riechstörungen, wobei der Schwerpunkt auf der Epidemiologie, der Pathophysiologie, den Heilungsraten, den derzeit verfügbaren Behandlungsmöglichkeiten und der Forschung zu neuen Behandlungsmethoden liegt. Zitierweise: Klimek L, Hagemann J, Döge J, Freudelsperger L, Cuevas M, Klimek F, Hummel T. Olfactory and gustatory disorders in COVID-19. Allergo J Int 2022;31:243-50 https://doi.org/10.1007/s40629-022-00216-7
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ludger Klimek
- FA für Dermatologie u. Allergologie, Zentrum f. Rhinologie und Allergologie, An den Quellen 10, 65183 Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Jan Hagemann
- Klinik f. Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Julia Döge
- Klinik f. Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Langenbeckstraße 1, 55131 Mainz, Germany
| | - Laura Koll
- Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Mandy Cuevas
- Klinik u. Poliklinik für Hals- Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Univ.-Klinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Fetscherstr. 74, 01307 Dresden, Germany
| | - Felix Klimek
- Zentrum für Rhinologie und Allergologie Wiesbaden, An den Quellen 10, 65183 Wiesbaden, Germany
| | - Thomas Hummel
- Klinik und Poliklinik für HNO-Heilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus, Dresden, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Luxi N, Giovanazzi A, Capuano A, Crisafulli S, Cutroneo PM, Fantini MP, Ferrajolo C, Moretti U, Poluzzi E, Raschi E, Ravaldi C, Reno C, Tuccori M, Vannacci A, Zanoni G, Trifirò G. COVID-19 Vaccination in Pregnancy, Paediatrics, Immunocompromised Patients, and Persons with History of Allergy or Prior SARS-CoV-2 Infection: Overview of Current Recommendations and Pre- and Post-Marketing Evidence for Vaccine Efficacy and Safety. Drug Saf 2021; 44:1247-1269. [PMID: 34739716 PMCID: PMC8569292 DOI: 10.1007/s40264-021-01131-6] [Citation(s) in RCA: 73] [Impact Index Per Article: 24.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 10/21/2021] [Indexed: 12/24/2022]
Abstract
To date, four vaccines have been authorised for emergency use and under conditional approval by the European Medicines Agency to prevent COVID-19: Comirnaty, COVID-19 Vaccine Janssen, Spikevax (previously COVID-19 Vaccine Moderna) and Vaxzevria (previously COVID-19 Vaccine AstraZeneca). Although the benefit-risk profile of these vaccines was proven to be largely favourable in the general population, evidence in special cohorts initially excluded from the pivotal trials, such as pregnant and breastfeeding women, children/adolescents, immunocompromised people and persons with a history of allergy or previous SARS-CoV-2 infection, is still limited. In this narrative review, we critically overview pre- and post-marketing evidence on the potential benefits and risks of marketed COVID-19 vaccines in the above-mentioned special cohorts. In addition, we summarise the recommendations of the scientific societies and regulatory agencies about COVID-19 primary prevention in the same vaccinee categories.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Nicoletta Luxi
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Alexia Giovanazzi
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Annalisa Capuano
- Section of Pharmacology "L. Donatelli", Department of Experimental Medicine, Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Salvatore Crisafulli
- Department of Biomedical and Dental Sciences and Morphofunctional Imaging, University of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Paola Maria Cutroneo
- Sicilian Regional Pharmacovigilance Centre, University Hospital of Messina, Messina, Italy
| | - Maria Pia Fantini
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Carmen Ferrajolo
- Section of Pharmacology "L. Donatelli", Department of Experimental Medicine, Campania Regional Centre for Pharmacovigilance and Pharmacoepidemiology, University of Campania "Luigi Vanvitelli", Naples, Italy
| | - Ugo Moretti
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Poluzzi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Science, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Emanuel Raschi
- Department of Medical and Surgical Science, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Claudia Ravaldi
- PeaRL-Perinatal Research Laboratory, NEUROFARBA Department, University of Florence and CiaoLapo Foundation for Perinatal Health, Florence, Italy
| | - Chiara Reno
- Department of Biomedical and Neuromotor Sciences, Alma Mater Studiorum, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Marco Tuccori
- Unit of Adverse Drug Reactions Monitoring, University Hospital of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| | - Alfredo Vannacci
- PeaRL-Perinatal Research Laboratory, NEUROFARBA Department, University of Florence and CiaoLapo Foundation for Perinatal Health, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Gianluca Trifirò
- Section of Pharmacology, Department of Diagnostics and Public Health, University of Verona, Piazzale L.A. Scuro 10, 37134, Verona, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Klimek L, Förster-Ruhrmann U, Beule AG, Chaker AM, Hagemann J, Huppertz T, Hoffmann TK, Dazert S, Deitmer T, Olze H, Strieth S, Wrede H, Schlenter W, Welkoborsky HJ, Wollenberg B, Becker S, Rudack C, Wagenmann M, Bergmann C, Bachert C. Positionspapier: Empfehlungen zur Anwendung von Omalizumab bei chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit Polyposis nasi (CRSwNP) im deutschen Gesundheitssystem – Empfehlungen des Ärzteverbandes Deutscher Allergologen (AeDA) und der AGs Klinische Immunologie, Allergologie und Umweltmedizin und Rhinologie und Rhinochirurgie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für HNO-Heilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie (DGHNOKHC). Laryngorhinootologie 2021; 100:952-963. [PMID: 34592767 DOI: 10.1055/a-1644-4066] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/16/2022]
Abstract
Zusammenfassung
Hintergrund Die chronische Rhinosinusitis mit Nasenpolypen (CRSwNP) ist eine multifaktorielle entzündliche Erkrankung der paranasalen Schleimhäute, der als Endotyp meistens eine TH2-Inflammation zugrunde liegt. IgE-Antikörper spielen dabei eine wichtige Rolle. Der anti-IgE-Antikörper Omalizumab wurde im August 2020 für die Therapie der schweren CRSwNP zugelassen.
Methoden In einer Literatursuche wurde die Immunologie der CRSwNP analysiert und die Evidenz zur Wirkung von Omalizumab bei dieser Erkrankung ermittelt durch Recherchen in Medline, Pubmed sowie den nationalen und internationalen Studien- und Leitlinien-Registern und der Cochrane Library.
Ergebnisse Basierend auf diesen Angaben aus der internationalen Literatur werden von einem Expertengremium Empfehlungen für die Anwendung von Omalizumab bei CRSwNP im deutschen Gesundheitssystem gegeben.
Schlussfolgerung Omalizumab ist zugelassen für Patienten ab 18 Jahren mit schwerer chronischer Rhinosinusitis mit Nasenpolypen als Zusatztherapie zu intranasalen Kortikosteroiden (INCS), wenn durch eine Therapie mit INCS keine ausreichende Krankheitskontrolle erzielt werden kann.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- L Klimek
- Zentrum für Rhinologie und Allergologie, Wiesbaden
| | | | - A G Beule
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - A M Chaker
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München.,Zentrum für Allergie und Umwelt (ZAUM), TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - J Hagemann
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin Mainz
| | - T Huppertz
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsmedizin Mainz
| | - T K Hoffmann
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Ulm
| | - S Dazert
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum, St. Elisabeth-Hospital, Bochum
| | - T Deitmer
- Deutsche Gesellschaft für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Kopf- und Halschirurgie, Bonn
| | - H Olze
- Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin
| | - S Strieth
- Klinik und Poliklinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohren-Heilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Bonn (UKB)
| | - H Wrede
- Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenarzt, Herford
| | - W Schlenter
- Ärzteverband Deutscher Allergologen, Dreieich
| | - H J Welkoborsky
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Klinikum Hannover
| | - B Wollenberg
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, TUM School of Medicine, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München
| | - S Becker
- Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenklinik und Poliklinik, Universitätsklinik Tübingen
| | - C Rudack
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Münster
| | - M Wagenmann
- Klinik für Hals-Nasen-Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Düsseldorf
| | - C Bergmann
- Praxis für Hals-, Nasen-, Ohrenheilkunde, Klinik RKM 740, Düsseldorf
| | - C Bachert
- Klinik für Hals-, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Universitätsklinikum Gent, Belgien
| |
Collapse
|