Analysis of the Pharmacoutilization of Biological Drugs in Psoriatic Arthritis Patients: A Real-World Retrospective Study Among an Italian Population

Secukinumab Persistence in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis: An Adalimumab-Matched Retrospective Cohort Database Study (FLYWAY)

INTRODUCTION

Long-term treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is required to prevent progression. However, persistence with current treatments is challenging due to tolerability and acceptability issues. The objective of this study was to estimate 1-year persistence with secukinumab in patients with PsA treated with secukinumab, to compare persistence rates between secukinumab and adalimumab, to estimate usefulness rates, and to document adverse events.

METHODS

This retrospective study used data from the Japanese Medical Data Vision database. A total of 182 patients with PsA initiating secukinumab were identified between February 1, 2015 and September 30, 2020. Of these, 171 could be matched to 171 patients initiating adalimumab over the same period using a propensity score. Patients were followed until death, treatment discontinuation, or until the end of the study period. Persistence rates were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. Usefulness was evaluated using a published algorithm. Selected adverse events were documented.

RESULTS

Twelve-month persistence with secukinumab was 68.3%. The median persistence duration was significantly higher (p = 0.002) for secukinumab (27.8 months) than for adalimumab (12.5 months). After 12 months, the treatment was found to be useful in 47.0% of the secukinumab cohort and 22.2% of the adalimumab cohort (p < 0.001). Fourteen patients (7.7%) in the unmatched secukinumab cohort and 32 (9.1%) in the unmatched adalimumab cohort presented an adverse event of interest.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PsA showed higher persistence with secukinumab than with adalimumab. Since PsA is a chronic disease that requires long-term treatment, long-term persistence and usefulness should be considered for the treatment choice. Infographic available for this article. INFOGRAPHIC.

The Persistence of Biologic Therapies for Psoriatic Arthritis: A Narrative Review

ABSTRACT

Drug persistence is a crucial measure of long-term efficacy, safety, and patient satisfaction. Lack of persistence can increase healthcare costs and morbidity and mortality rates. This review aimed to consolidate available data on drug persistence for various biological treatments used as the primary intervention for psoriatic arthritis and identify factors associated with nonpersistence. Reports indicate variable 1-year persistence rates for biologic therapies, ranging from 37% to 73%. Specifically, tumor necrosis factor inhibitors have shown fluctuating 1-year persistence rates ranging from 32% to 85%. IL-12/23 and IL-23 inhibitors demonstrate persistence rates of 25% to 89%, whereas data for IL-17 and JAK inhibitors are more limited, ranging from 51% to 77%. Factors such as female sex and a higher burden of comorbidities have been associated with an increased risk of nonpersistence, although evidence regarding other factors remains scarce. The significant variability in reported persistence rates may be attributed to differences in treatment gaps and methodologies across studies. Addressing and mitigating the factors leading to nonpersistence is essential for improving treatment outcomes in psoriatic arthritis.

Proactive therapeutic drug monitoring of biologic drugs in adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis, or psoriasis: a clinical practice guideline

CLINICAL QUESTION

In adult patients with inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis (rheumatoid arthritis, spondyloarthritis, psoriatic arthritis), or psoriasis taking biologic drugs, does proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) improve outcomes as compared with standard care?

CONTEXT AND CURRENT PRACTICE

Standard care for immune mediated inflammatory diseases includes prescribing biologic drugs at pre-determined doses. Dosing may be adjusted reactively, for example with increased disease activity. In proactive TDM, serum drug levels and anti-drug antibodies are measured irrespective of disease activity, and the drug dosing is adjusted to achieve target serum drug levels, usually within pre-specified therapeutic ranges. The role of proactive TDM in clinical practice remains unclear, with conflicting guideline recommendations and emerging evidence from randomised controlled trials.

THE EVIDENCE

Linked systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis which identified 10 trials including 2383 participants. Inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis, and psoriasis were grouped together as best current research evidence on proactive TDM did not suggest heterogeneity of effects on outcomes of interest. Proactive TDM of intravenous infliximab during maintenance treatment may increase the proportion of patients who experience sustained disease control or sustained remission without considerable additional harm. For adalimumab, it remains unclear if proactive TDM during maintenance treatment has an effect on sustained disease control or sustained remission. At induction (start) of treatment, proactive TDM of intravenous infliximab may have little or no effect on achieving remission. No eligible trial evidence was available for proactive TDM of adalimumab at induction (start) of treatment. No eligible trial evidence was available for proactive TDM of other biologic drugs in maintenance or at induction (start) of treatment.

RECOMMENDATIONS

The guideline panel issued the following recommendations for patients with inflammatory bowel disease, inflammatory arthritis, or psoriasis:1. A weak recommendation in favour of proactive TDM for intravenous infliximab during maintenance treatment2. A weak recommendation against proactive TDM for adalimumab and other biologic drugs during maintenance treatment3. A weak recommendation against proactive TDM for intravenous infliximab, adalimumab, and other biologic drugs during induction (start) of treatment.

UNDERSTANDING THE RECOMMENDATIONS

When considering proactive TDM, clinicians and patients should engage in shared decision making to ensure patients make choices that reflect their values and preferences. The availability of laboratory assays to implement proactive TDM should also be considered. Further research is warranted and may alter recommendations in the future.

HOW THIS GUIDELINE WAS CREATED

An international panel including patient partners, clinicians, and methodologists produced these recommendations based on a linked systematic review and pairwise meta-analysis which identified 10 trials including 2383 participants. The panel followed standards for trustworthy guidelines and used the GRADE approach, explicitly considering the balance of benefits and harms and burdens of treatment from an individual patient perspective.

Switching patterns of biological drugs in patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: insight from the VALORE database network

BACKGROUND

Switch patterns among different biologics and from originators to biosimilars (and vice versa) can be complex in patients with psoriasis (PsO) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA).

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to describe switching patterns of biological drugs in PsO/PsA patients and to explore predictors of multiple switches and switch-back.

RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS

A large-scale retrospective cohort study was conducted using the Italian VALORE database. Bio-naïve users treated for PsO/PsA during 2010-2022 were included. Time to switch/swap and predictors of multiple switches and switch-back were analyzed.

RESULTS

Thirty-thousand seven hundred bio-naïve users were included. At 3 and 5 years of follow-up, patients with at least one switch/swap were 37.1% and 47.8%, respectively. The median time to first switch/swap was significantly shorter (p< 0.001) for TNF-α inhibitors (2,068 days) than anti-IL (2,780 days). At 1 year of follow-up patients starting with IL-23 switched/swapped biological therapy less frequently than those with anti-IL-12/23 and anti-IL-17 (4.9% vs. 8.7% and 9.4%, respectively). Patients starting with anti-IL-12/23 reported a significantly lower risk of multiple switches and switch-back (0.74, 95% CI, 0.67-0.83; 0.58, 95% CI, 0.44-0.77, respectively) than those with TNF-α inhibitors.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with PsO/PsA starting with TNF-α inhibitors switch/swap more rapidly and frequently than those with anti-IL, which are also associated with a reduced risk of multiple switches during follow-up.

Drug utilization and medication adherence for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis: an Italian study

Introduction

This study aims to evaluate the persistence, treatment adherence and drug cost associated with biologic and targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) in the management of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in Italy, with a focus on biosimilar drugs.

Methods

This was a retrospective observational study involving eight hospital pharmacies, between January 2017 and December 2020, on naïve patients with at least one b/tsDMARD dispensation indicated for PsA. Patients were followed up for 12 months and persistence and adherence were evaluated by proportion of days covered (PDC). The originator and biosimilar for adalimumab and etanercept were compared. Furthermore, the real annual cost per patient based on adherence to therapy was calculated.

Results

Patients initiating b/tsDMARDs for PsA had a mean persistence of 263 days and 48.6% remained persistent for 1 year. Adherent patients (PDC ≥ 0.8) were 47.6% for the overall population. Similar persistence and adherence were observed between patients treated with the adalimumab originator and its biosimilar, while patients treated with the etanercept originator showed lower persistence and adherence compared to those treated with its biosimilar (mean persistence: 222 vs. 267 days, patient persistent at 1 year: 29.4% vs. 51.5%, mean PDC: 0.53 vs. 0.70, adherent patients: 23.5% vs. 51.5%). The average annual drug cost ranged from €8,724 (etanercept) to €14,783 (ustekinumab), with an annual saving of more than €2,500 by using biosimilars.

Conclusion

Poor adherence to medications contributes to suboptimal clinical outcomes. The comparison between biosimilar and originator offers further evidence in support of the biosimilar to optimizing resources in healthcare.

Real-World Persistence and Treatment Patterns in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis Treated with Anti-IL17 Therapy in Spain: The PerfIL-17 Study

INTRODUCTION

Given the growing interest and use of interleukin-17 inhibitors (anti-IL17) for the treatment of psoriatic arthritis (PsA), an observational study has been conducted to characterize the patient profile, treatment patterns, and persistence of ixekizumab or secukinumab in patients with PsA receiving them as first anti-IL17.

METHODS

This is a multicenter retrospective study, conducted at eight Spanish hospitals where data from adult patients with PsA were collected from electronic medical records. Three cohorts of patients, initiating treatment with an anti-IL17 [secukinumab 150 mg (SECU150), secukinumab 300 mg (SECU300), or ixekizumab (IXE)] between January 2019 and March 2021, were included. Demographic and clinical patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and persistence were analyzed descriptively. Continuous data were presented as mean [standard deviation (SD)] and categorical variables as frequencies with percentages. Persistence rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were calculated.

RESULTS

A total of 221 patients with PsA were included in the study [SECU150, 103 (46.6%); SECU300, 38 (17.2%); and IXE, 80 (36.2%)]. Treatment patterns differed by clinical characteristics: SECU150 was initiated more frequently in patients with moderate PsA and less peripheral joint involvement, while patients on SECU300 included those with a higher rate of enthesitis and active skin psoriasis, and patients on IXE showed a longer time since PsA diagnosis, more frequent comorbidities, joint involvement, and diagnosed skin psoriasis. Conventional synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs) were previously administered in 88.2% of patients and biologic or targeted synthetic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (b/tsDMARDs) were administered in 72.9%. The mean number of previous b/tsDMARDs was 2.4 (SD 1.5) in the IXE cohort, 1.7 (SD 0.9) in the SECU300 cohort, and 1.6 (SD 1.0) for those in the SECU150 cohort. The global persistence on all anti-IL17 was 97.2%, 88.4%, and 81.0% at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. The most frequent reason for discontinuation across the three cohorts was lack of effectiveness (16.7%; 37/221).

CONCLUSIONS

Most of the patients with PsA treated with anti-IL17 in Spain had moderate to severe disease activity, high peripheral joint and skin involvement, and had received previous b/tsDMARDs. More than 80% of patients with a 1-year follow-up persisted on anti-IL17, with the highest rate observed in the IXE cohort, followed by the SECU150 then SECU300 cohorts.

Persistence and Use of Ixekizumab in Patients with Psoriatic Arthritis in Real-World Practice in Spain. The PRO-STIP Study

INTRODUCTION

Ixekizumab (IXE) is an IgG4-type monoclonal antibody targeting IL-17A indicated alone or in combination with methotrexate, for the treatment of active psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in adult patients with insufficient response or with intolerance to one or more disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (DMARD) therapy. The PRO-STIP study aimed to describe persistence, patient characteristics, treatment patterns, and effectiveness in patients with PsA receiving IXE in a real-world clinical setting in Spain.

METHODS

This was an observational, multicentric, retrospective, longitudinal study in adult PsA patients who started IXE between January 2019 and December 2020, with at least 24 weeks of follow-up. A descriptive analysis of patient characteristics and treatment patterns was performed. The primary objective, treatment persistence, was estimated by Kaplan-Meier survival curve. Effectiveness was evaluated by Disease Activity in Psoriatic Arthritis (DAPSA) scores at baseline and at 12 and 24 weeks.

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients met the selection criteria (55.1% women and mean age 51.5 years). The median time from PsA diagnosis to starting IXE was 7.7 years (IQR 3.4-14.6). Prior to IXE, 95.5% patients had been treated with at least one biologic or targeted synthetic DMARD (b/tsDMARD). The observed persistence rates were 95.5%, 84.3% and 68.5% at 24, 48, and 104 weeks, respectively. The median persistence was not reached in the study period (mean persistence, 86.9 [95% CI 80.6-93.2] weeks). Twenty-eight (31.5%) patients discontinued IXE, 19 patients (21.3%) due to loss of effectiveness and two patients (2.2%) due to adverse events. In patients receiving treatment and with available effectiveness assessment (n = 24), DAPSA decreased significantly from baseline 23.7 (95% CI 19.5-27.9) to 14.8 (95% CI 10.5-19.2) at 12 weeks (p = 0.005) and 14.3 (95% CI 11.1-17.4) at 24 weeks (p = 0.004).

CONCLUSIONS

PsA patients treated with IXE in a real-world setting show high treatment persistence through 104 weeks and improvements in disease activity after treatment initiation. This suggests that IXE could be an effective treatment for patients with PsA.

RETROSPECTIVELY REGISTERED

Date of registration: 25th May 2021.

Psoriasis/Psoriatic Arthritis Patients' Long-term Treatment Patterns and Adherence to Systemic Treatments Monitoring Recommendations

Limited information exists regarding treatment of patients with psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis in primary care. The aim of this study is to assess treatment patterns, adherence, persistence, and compliance in newly diagnosed patients with psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis from 2012 to 2018 in Stockholm, Sweden. In addition, laboratory monitoring before initiation of treatment and at recommended intervals was quantified for patients prescribed methotrexate or biologics. A total of 51,639 individuals were included, with 39% initiating treatment with topical corticosteroids and < 5% receiving systemic treatment within 6 months post-diagnosis. During a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 7 (4-8) years, 18% of patients received systemic treatments at some point. Overall, 5-year persistence rates were 32%, 45% and 19% for methotrexate, biologics, and other systemic treatments, respectively. Pre-initiation laboratory tests, as recommended by guidelines, were performed in approximately 70% and 62% of methotrexate and biologics users, respectively. Follow-up monitoring at recommended time intervals occurred in 14-20% and 31-33% of patients prescribed methotrexate and biologics, respectively. These findings highlight gaps in the pharmacological care of patients with psoriasis/psoriatic arthritis, including suboptimal adherence/persistence and inadequate laboratory monitoring.