Vertebral growth modulation by posterior dynamic deformity correction device in skeletally immature patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

Re-evaluation of Incorrect Posture as a Diagnostic Criterion for Scoliosis in School Screenings: A Cross-Sectional Study in Vietnam

A cross-sectional study was performed to determine the prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis through school screening and to evaluate the correlation between incorrect posture identified during screening and the confirmed diagnosis of scoliosis, utilizing the gold standard criterion in 3,527 children aged 10 to 17 years from March 2023 to December 2023 in Ho Chi Minh City, Vietnam. The evaluation method included Adam's forward bending test with the angle of trunk rotation, and a cut-off point greater than or equal to 5°. Based on clinical examination, the research results show that 312 (8.7%) children were suspected of having scoliosis. Still, the prevalence of idiopathic scoliosis confirmed by X-rays was 130 (3.6%) children, with the standard being Cobb angle ≥10°. Most people with idiopathic scoliosis had moderate curves, including 119 (91.5%) and 130 (100%) demonstrated positive vertebral body rotation, with a female-to-male ratio of 2.11:1. The study identified a correlation between suspected scoliosis and incorrect posture seen during screening, including "shoulder-height difference", "any curve in the spine", and "humps on one side" (p < 0.001). However, no correlation was determined between these listed incorrect postures and a definitive diagnosis of idiopathic scoliosis by X-rays (p > 0.05). The results of the research suggest that incorrect posture found by clinical assessment shouldn't be used as the main criterion for scoliosis diagnosis during screening. The use of the angle of trunk rotation, combined with Adam's forward bending test and a suitable cut-off angle, is required to be considered for scoliosis screening in schools.

Matched comparison of non-fusion surgeries for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior dynamic distraction device and vertebral body tethering

PURPOSE

Two non-fusion devices for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) received HDE approval for clinical use in 2019: posterior dynamic distraction device (PDDD) and vertebral body tethering system (VBT). Although indications are similar, there is no comparative study of these devices. We hypothesize that curve correction will be comparable, but PDDD will have better perioperative metrics.

METHODS

AIS PDDD patients were prospectively enrolled in this matched multicenter study. Inclusion criteria were Lenke 1 or 5 curves, preoperative curves 35°-60°, correction to ≤30° on bending radiographs, and kyphosis <55°. Patients were matched by age, sex, Risser, curve type and curve magnitude to a single-center cohort of VBT patients. Results were compared at 2 years.

RESULTS

20 PDDD patients were matched to 20 VBT patients. Blood loss was higher in the VBT cohort (88 vs. 36 ml, p < 0.001). Operative time and postoperative length of stay were longer in the VBT cohort, 177 vs. 115 min (p < 0.001) (2.9 vs. 1.2 days, p < 0.001). Postoperative curve measurement and correction at 6 months were better in the PDDD cohort (15° vs. 24°, p < 0.001; 68% vs. 50%, p < 0.001). At 1-year, PDDD patients had improved Cobb angles (14° vs. 21°, p = 0.001). At 2 years, a correction was improved in the PDDD cohort, with a curve measurement of 17° for PDDD and 22° for VBT (p = 0.043). At the latest follow-up, 3 PDDD patients and 1 VBT patient underwent revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

Early results show PDDD demonstrates better index correction, reduced operative time, less blood loss, and shorter length of stay but higher rates of revision compared to a matched cohort of VBT patients at two-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort matched comparative study.

Preliminary Study of Motion Preservation Following Posterior Dynamic Distraction Device in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis Patients

BACKGROUND

Motion-sparing scoliosis surgeries such as the posterior dynamic distraction device (PDDD) are slowly increasing in use. However, there is limited clinical data documenting postoperative motion across the PDDD construct. With this cohort study, we aim to measure sagittal and coronal motion following PDDD. We hypothesize coronal and sagittal spinal motion will be partially preserved across the construct.

METHODS

Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. Preoperative and minimum 1-year postoperative coronal range of motion across the instrumented levels was compared. Available flexion/extension radiographs were evaluated postoperatively to assess sagittal arc of motion. Radiographs from latest follow-up were used.

RESULTS

At a mean of 1.9 years (1 to 5 y), flexibility radiographs were available on 29 patients treated with PDDD (17 thoracic, 12 lumbar). Mean age at surgery was 16 years (12 to 25). Postoperative coronal arc of motion in PDDD patients was 11 degrees (3 to 19 degrees) in the thoracic spine and 10 degrees (0 to 28 degrees) in the lumbar spine. Compared with preoperative motion, the thoracic arc of motion was maintained by 33% (35 to 11 degrees) and lumbar motion was maintained by 30% (34 to 10 degrees). Flexion-extension radiographs were available on 7 patients. Sagittal arc for the upper instrumented vertebral end plate to the lower instrumented vertebral endplate of the cohort was 10 degrees in the thoracic spine (6 to 18) and 14 degrees in the lumbar spine (5 to 21). Sagittal measurements for the changes in the arc of the upper and lower screws on the construct were 4 degrees in the thoracic group (2 to 8) and 9 degrees in the lumbar group (2 to 17). By latest follow-up 11 patients (38%) underwent reoperation, with most cases due to implant breakage (N=4, 14%), extender misalignment (N=2, 7%), and screw misplacement (N=2, 7%).

CONCLUSION

At mean 1.9 years postoperatively, PDDD preserves measurable spinal motion over the construct both in the coronal and the sagittal plane without evidence for autofusion. Coronal arc of motion averages 10 to 12 degrees and sagittal arc of motion ranged from 4 to 14 degrees, although this varies by patient. This study confirms that PDDD for pediatric scoliosis preserves a measurable degree of postoperative flexibility both in the sagittal and coronal planes.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II-therapeutic study.

Differential vertebral body growth is maintained after vertebral body tethering surgery for idiopathic scoliosis: 4-year follow-up on 888 peri-apical vertebrae and 592 intervertebral discs

PURPOSE

To radiographically evaluate if vertebral body tethering (VBT) can maintain differential peri-apical vertebral growth at medium-term follow-up of 4 years.

METHODS

A prospective, international, multicenter database was queried to identify idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with thoracic VBT. Concave vs. convex vertebral body height, vertebral wedging, and disc wedging of the 3 peri-apical vertebrae were measured by two independent observers at 5 timepoints (pre-operative to 4-year follow-up).

RESULTS

65 skeletally immature patients (60 female, mean 12.8 years old, 21 with open triradiate cartilages) met inclusion criteria. Mean pre-operative maximum scoliosis of 50 ± 8° decreased significantly post-operatively to 27 ± 9° (p < 0.001), which remained stable at 4-year follow-up 30 ± 17° (p = 0.38 vs. post-operative). Mean instrumented scoliosis was 21 ± 14° at 4-year follow-up, which was significantly different than 4-year maximum scoliosis (p < 0.001). Mean pre-operative kyphosis of 30 ± 12° did not significantly change post-operatively (p = 1.0) and remained stable at 4-year follow-up (35 ± 18°; p = 0.05). Mean individual convex vertebral height increased from 17.7 ± 1.9 mm to 19.8 ± 1.5 mm (p < 0.001), while mean individual concave height increased from 14.8 ± 1.9 mm to 17.6 ± 1.6 mm (p < 0.001). Summing the peri-apical heights, the difference in height from pre-operative to 4-year follow-up was greater on the concave (8.3 ± 4.7 mm) than on the convex side (6.2 ± 4.7 mm) (p < 0.001). Mean individual vertebral wedging decreased from 6 ± 2° at pre-operative to 4 ± 2° at 4-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Mean total vertebral and disc wedging started at 29 ± 7° pre-operatively, decreased to 16 ± 6° at post-operative (p < 0.001), then further decreased to 14 ± 8° at 4-year follow-up (p < 0.001). Patients with open triradiate cartilages at the time of surgery had a larger height change over the 4 years compared to those with closed triradiate cartilages (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Patients with idiopathic scoliosis treated with VBT demonstrated differential vertebral growth which was maintained at minimum 4-year follow-up. This effect was more pronounced in patients whose triradiate cartilages were open at the time of surgery.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

III.

Can Dynamic Spinal Stabilization Be an Alternative to Fusion Surgery in Adult Spinal Deformity Cases?

BACKGROUND

Rigid stabilization and fusion surgery are widely used for the correction of spinal sagittal and coronal imbalance (SCI). However, instrument failure, pseudoarthrosis, and adjacent segment disease are frequent complications of rigid stabilization and fusion surgery in elderly patients. In this study, we present the results of dynamic stabilization and 2-stage dynamic stabilization surgery for the treatment of spinal SCI. The advantages and disadvantages are discussed, especially as an alternative to fusion surgery.

METHODS

In our study, spinal, sagittal, and coronal deformities were corrected with dynamic stabilization performed in a single session in patients with good bone quality (without osteopenia and osteoporosis), while 2-stage surgery was performed in patients with poor bone quality (first stage: percutaneous placement of screws; second stage: placement of dynamic rods and correction of spinal SCI 4-6 months after the first stage). One-stage dynamic spinal instrumentation was applied to 20 of 25 patients with spinal SCI, and 2-stage dynamic spinal instrumentation was applied to the remaining 5 patients.

RESULTS

Spinal SCI was corrected with these stabilization systems. At 2-year follow-up, no significant loss was observed in the instrumentation system, while no significant loss of correction was observed in sagittal and coronal deformities.

CONCLUSION

In adult patients with spinal SCI, single or 2-stage dynamic stabilization is a viable alternative to fusion surgery due to the very low rate of instrument failure.

CLINICAL RELEVANCE

This study questions the use of dynamic stabilization systems for the treatment of adult degenerative deformities.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4

Non-Fusion Versus Fusion Surgery in Pediatric Idiopathic Scoliosis: What Trade-Offs in Outcomes Are Acceptable for the Patient and Family?

BACKGROUND

Vertebral body tethering and other non-fusion techniques for the treatment of pediatric idiopathic scoliosis are increasing in popularity. There is limited physician consensus on this topic as the result of a paucity of published data regarding which patients most benefit from non-fusion strategies. Thus, much of the decision-making is left to patients and parents, who must select a treatment based on their goals and values and the information available from health-care providers, the internet, and social media. We sought to understand patient and family preferences regarding the attributes of fusion versus non-fusion surgery that drive these choices.

METHODS

Patients and families were recruited from 7 pediatric spine centers and were asked to complete a survey-based choice experiment that had been jointly developed with the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to evaluate patient preferences. Choices between experimentally designed alternatives were analyzed to estimate the relative importance of outcomes and requirements associated with the choice options (attributes). The attributes included appearance, confidence in the planned correction, spinal motion, device failure, reoperation, and recovery period. The inclusion criteria were (1) an age of 10 to 21 years and (2) a diagnosis of adolescent idiopathic scoliosis in patients who were considering, or who had already undergone, treatment with fusion or non-fusion surgery. Preference weights were estimated from the expected changes in choice given changes in the attributes.

RESULTS

A total of 344 respondents (124 patients, 92 parents, and 128 parent/patient dyads) completed the survey. One hundred and seventy-three patients were enrolled prior to surgery, and 171 were enrolled after surgery. Appearance and motion were found to be the most important drivers of choice. For the entire cohort, fusion was preferred over non-fusion. For patients who were considering surgery, the most important attributes were preservation of spinal motion and appearance.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients and families seeking treatment for idiopathic scoliosis value appearance and preservation of spinal motion and, to a lesser extent, reoperation rates when considering fusion versus non-fusion surgery.

Surgical Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis with the ApiFix Minimal Invasive Dynamic Correction System-A Preliminary Report of a 24-Month Follow-Up

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a three-dimensional growth disorder. Corrective surgical procedures are the recommended treatment option for a thoracic angle exceeding 50° and a lumbar major curve of 40°. Over the past few years, dynamic growth modulation implants have been developed as alternatives to permanent fusion. The ApiFix system was designed as a 2D "posterior dynamic device" for curve correction. After implantation in a minimally invasive procedure, it uses polyaxial joints and a self-adjusting rod to preserve the degree of motion and to accommodate the patient's growth. It provides an effective method of controlling deformity and fills the gap between the conservative treatment of major curves that are >35° and the fusion procedure. The objective of the two-center cohort study was the analysis of the correction results of patients, who underwent surgical intervention with the ApiFix system. The inclusion criteria were AIS, Lenke type 1 or type 5, a major curve on bending films of ≤30°, and an angle of the major curve of between 35° and 60°. Postoperative radiograph data were obtained longitudinally for up to 24 months of follow-up and compared to preoperative (preop) values. For comparisons of the different time points, non-parametric tests (Wilcoxon) or paired t-tests for normally distributed values were used to analyze repeated measures. Overall, 36 patients (25 female and 11 male) were treated with the ApiFix system from April 2018 to October 2020. Lenke type 1 was identified in 21 (58%) cases and Lenke type 5 was identified in 15 (42%) cases. The average angle of the thoracic major curve for Lenke 1 was 43°. The preoperative lumbar major curve (Lenke 5) was determined to be 43°. Over a follow-up of 24 months, a correction of the major curve to an average of 20° was observed for Lenke 1 and that to an average of 15° was observed for Lenke 5. Lenke type 1 and type 5 showed significant changes in the major curve over the individual test intervals in the paired comparisons compared to the starting angle (Lenke 1: preop-24 months, 0.002; Lenke 5: preop-24 months, 0.043). Overall, 11 events were recorded in the follow-up period, that required revision surgery. We distinguished between repeated interventions required after reaching the maximum distraction length of the implant due to the continued growth of the patient (n = 4) and complications, such as infections or problems associated with the anchorage of the implant (n = 7). The results from the present cohort revealed a statistically significant improvement in the postoperatively measured angles of the major and minor curves in the follow-up after 24 months. Consequently, the results were comparable to those of the already established vertebral body tethering method. Alignment in AIS via dynamic correction systems in combination with a possible growth modulation has been a treatment alternative to surgical fusing procedures for more than a decade. However, the long-term corrective effect has to be validated in further studies.

Concave and convex growth do not differ over tethered vertebral segments, even with open tri-radiate cartilage

PURPOSE

To assess the following hypotheses related to vertebral body tethering (VBT): 1. VBT is associated with asymmetric (concave > convex) increases in height over the instrumented vertebra. 2. The instrumented Cobb angle improves following VBT surgery with growth.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case series of pediatric patients from a multicenter scoliosis registry treated with VBT between 2013 to 2021.

INCLUSION CRITERIA

patients with standing radiographs at < 4 months and ≥ 2 years after surgery. Distances between the superior endplate of the UIV and the inferior endplate of the LIV were measured at the concave corner, mid-point, and convex corner of the endplates. The UIV-LIV angle was recorded. Subgroup analyses included comparing different Risser scores and tri-radiate cartilage (TRC) closed versus open using student t-tests.

RESULTS

83 patients met inclusion criteria (92% female; age at time of surgery 12.5 ± 1.4 years) with mean follow-up time of 3.8 ± 1.4 years. Risser scores at surgery were: 0 (n = 33), 1 (n = 12), 2 (n = 10), 3 (n = 11), 4 (n = 12), and 5 (n = 5). Of the 33 Risser 0 patients, 17 had an open TRC, 16 had a closed TRC. The UIV-LIV distance at concave, middle, and convex points significantly increased from immediate post-op to final-follow-up for Risser 0 patients, but not for Risser 1-5 patients. Increases in UIV-LIV distance were not significantly different between concave, middle, and convex points for all groups. There was no significant improvement or worsening in UIV-LIV angle for any group.

CONCLUSION

At a mean of 3.8 years following VBT, 33 Risser 0 patients demonstrated significant growth in the instrumented segment, though there was no difference between concave or convex growth, even for patients with open TRC.

Fusionless All-Pedicle Screws for Posterior Deformity Correction in AIS Immature Patients Permit the Restoration of Normal Vertebral Morphology and Removal of the Instrumentation Once Bone Maturity Is Reached

The aim of this study was to report the restoration of normal vertebral morphology and the absence of curve progression after the removal of instrumentation in AIS patients that underwent posterior correction of the deformity by a common all-screws construct without fusion. A series of 36 AIS immature patients (Risser 3 or less) were included in the study. Instrumentation was removed once the maturity stage was complete (Risser 5). The curve correction was assessed pre- and postoperatively, before instrumentation removal, directly post-removal, and more than two years after instrumentation was removed. Epiphyseal vertebral growth modulation was assessed by the coronal wedging ratio (WR) at the apical level of the main curve (MC). The mean preoperative coronal Cobb was corrected from 53.7° ± 7.5 to 5.5° ± 7.5° (89.7%) at the immediate postop. After implant removal (31.0 ± 5.8 months), the MC was 13.1°. T5-T12 kyphosis showed significant improvement from 19.0° before curve correction to 27.1° after implant removal (p < 0.05). Before surgery, the WR was 0.71 ± 0.06, and after removal, 0.98 ± 0.08 (p < 0.001). At the end of the follow-up, the mean sagittal range of motion (ROM) of the T12-S1 segment was 51.2 ± 21.0°. The SRS-22 scores improved from 3.31 ± 0.25 preoperatively to 3.68 ± 0.25 at the final assessment (p < 0.001). In conclusion, a fusionless posterior approach using common all-pedicle screws correctly constructed satisfactory scoliotic main curves and permitted the removal of instrumentation once bone maturity was reached. The final correction was highly satisfactory, and an acceptable ROM of the previously lower instrumented segments was observed.

Reliability of radiographic assessment of growth modulation from anterior vertebral body tethering surgery in pediatric scoliosis

PURPOSE

To assess the reliability of vertebral height and angular measurements for anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT).

METHODS

Eight observers measured PA radiographs of 15 idiopathic scoliosis patients treated with AVBT, pre-operative and 4-year follow-up. Vertebral wedging, disc wedging, convex vertebral body heights, and concave vertebral body heights of the 3 apical vertebrae were measured. For each observer, there were a total of 90 measurements for vertebral body height and 75 measurements for all wedging types At least 14 days elapsed between first and second round measurements.

RESULTS

From the pre-operative to the 4-year follow-up time-point, the total wedging angle over the 3 peri-apical levels fell from 30 ± 7° to 16 ± 6° (p < 0.001) and the difference between the convex and concave vertebral heights decreased from 9 ± 4 to 6 ± 3 mm (p < 0.001). Interobserver agreement for pre-operative vertebral body heights was good [ICC = 0.80; 95% CI (0.74-0.85)]. At 4-year follow-up there was a moderate agreement [ICC = 0.67 (0.59-0.74)]. There was a poor interobserver agreement for pre-operative wedging angle measurements [ICC = 0.41 (0.32-0.52)] and 4-year follow-up [ICC = 0.45 (0.36-0.56)]. The Limits of Agreement with the Mean (LOAM) for pre-op heights was ± 2.4 mm, similar to the follow-up ± 2.6 mm. When raters are averaged in random groups of two the agreement limits decrease to ± 1.8 mm pre-op and ± 1.6 mm at follow-up. Similarly for wedging angles, LOAM values among the 8 observers of ± 4.6° pre-op and ± 4.2° dropped to ± 2.7° for both pre-op and follow-up when random groups of two raters were averaged together. Intraobserver agreement ranged from good to excellent per individual (ICC = 0.84-0.94) for pre-operative vertebral body heights, but this decreased at 4-year follow-up (ICC = 0.52-0.88). Intraobserver agreement was low overall for wedging (pre-operative ICC = 0.41-0.71; 4-year follow-up ICC = 0.41-0.76).

CONCLUSION

Based on 8 individual observers, interobserver agreement ranged from good (pre-operative vertebral body heights) to moderate (4-year follow-up vertebral body heights) to poor (all wedging angles). To improve the reliability of the measurement of wedging angles, we recommend averaging the measurements of at least two observers.

Anterior vertebral body tethering for idiopathic scoliosis in growing children: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The management of idiopathic scoliosis (IS) in skeletally immature patients should aim at three-dimensional deformity correction, without compromising spinal and chest growth. In 2019, the US Food and Drug Administration approved the first instrumentation system for anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT), under a Humanitarian Device Exception, for skeletally immature patients with curves having a Cobb angle between 35° and 65°.

AIM

To summarize current evidence about the efficacy and safety of AVBT in the management of IS in skeletally immature patients.

METHODS

From January 2014 to January 2021, Ovid Medline, Embase, Cochrane Library, Scopus, Web of Science, Google Scholar and PubMed were searched to identify relevant studies. The methodological quality of the studies was evaluated and relevant data were extracted.

RESULTS

Seven clinical trials recruiting 163 patients were included in the present review. Five studies out of seven were classified as high quality, whereas the remaining two studies were classified as moderate quality. A total of 151 of 163 AVBT procedures were performed in the thoracic spine, and the remaining 12 tethering in the lumbar spine. Only 117 of 163 (71.8%) patients had a nonprogressive curve at skeletal maturity. Twenty-three of 163 (14.11%) patients required unplanned revision surgery within the follow-up period. Conversion to posterior spinal fusion (PSF) was performed in 18 of 163 (11%) patients.

CONCLUSION

AVBT is a promising growth-friendly technique for treatment of IS in growing patients. However, it has moderate success and perioperative complications, revision and conversion to PSF.

Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering for Treatment of Idiopathic Scoliosis in the Skeletally Immature: Results of 112 Cases

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective case series.

OBJECTIVE

Determine the efficacy of anterior vertebral body tethering (AVBT) in skeletally immature patients.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

The value of AVBT is currently unclear given the paucity of available data.

METHODS

Consecutive skeletally immature patients with idiopathic scoliosis were treated with AVBT between 2012 and 2018 by one of two surgeons working at two independent centers and followed up for >2 years. Data were collected prospectively and supplemented retrospectively where necessary. Outcomes were measured preoperatively, at first erect radiograph (FE), 1-year postoperatively and at most recent follow up (FU).

RESULTS

One hundred twelve patients underwent 116 primary tethering procedures (108 thoracic and eight lumbar tethers). Four patients had primary tethering of both lumbar and thoracic curves. At surgery mean age was 12.7 ± 1.4 years (8.2-16.7) and Risser 0.5 ± 0.9 (0-3). Follow up was mean 37 ± 9 months (15-64). Preoperative mean coronal Cobb angle of the 130 tethered curves was 50.8° ± 10.2 (31-81) and corrected significantly to 26.6° ± 10.1 (-3-61) at FE radiograph (P < 0.001). Further significant improvement was seen from FE to 1-year, to mean 23.1° ± 12.4 (-37-57) (P < 0.001). There was a small but significant increase between 1-year and FU to 25.7° ± 16.3 (-32-58) (P < 0.001), which appeared to reflect tether breakage. Untethered minor curves were corrected from 31.0° ± 9.5 (3-57) to 20.3° ± 10.3 (0-52) at FU (P < 0.001). Rib hump was corrected from 14.1 ± 4.8 (0-26) to 8.8° ± 5.4 (0-22) at FU (P < 0.01). Twenty-five patients (22%) had 28 complications. Fifteen patients (13%) requiring 18 revision operations including six completed and one awaited fusions.

CONCLUSION

AVBT of immature cases is associated with satisfactory deformity correction in the majority of cases. However, complication and revision rates suggest the need for improved implants and patient selection. Long-term follow-up remains crucial to establish the true efficacy of this procedure.Level of Evidence: 3.

High Failure Rates of a Unilateral Posterior Peri-Apical Distraction Device (ApiFix) for Fusionless Treatment of Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis

BACKGROUND

Conventional surgical treatment for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) consists of correction of the spinal deformity with rigid spinal instrumentation and fusion. Less-invasive and fusionless surgery could potentially improve patient outcomes. The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy of a recently U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved posterior peri-apical self-distracting device (ApiFix) that is designed to gradually correct the deformity without spinal fusion.

METHODS

In a prospective cohort study of 20 patients with AIS (Risser stage 1-4; Lenke 1 or 5; major curve Cobb angle, 40° to 55°; and Bunnell scoliometer rotation, <15°) were managed with the ApiFix device. Clinical and radiographic performance was assessed.

RESULTS

Twenty patients with a mean age (and standard deviation) of 14.8 ± 1.4 years were followed for a mean of 3.4 ± 1.0 years. The average major curve was reduced from 45.4° preoperatively to 31.4° at 2 weeks postoperatively and 31.0° at the time of the latest follow-up. The average minor curve measured 31.3° preoperatively, 26.1° at 2 weeks postoperatively, and 24.2° at the time of the latest follow-up. Ten patients had serious complications that required revision surgery, including osteolysis (n = 6), screw and/or rod breakage (n = 2), failure of the ratchet mechanism (n = 1), and pain without explainable cause (n = 1). During revision surgery, metallosis was observed in all patients and cultures showed growth of Cutibacterium acnes in 6 patients. Because of the high failure rate, the study was terminated early.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the unilateral peri-apical concave self-distracting ratchet rod initially was associated with promising clinical and radiographic results. However, no distraction was observed and the high rate of serious adverse events within 2 years was considered to be unacceptable for further clinical application of this device in our institution, despite recent FDA approval.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Vertebral growth modulation by posterior dynamic deformity correction device in skeletally immature patients with moderate adolescent idiopathic scoliosis

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective, comparative, multicenter.

INTRODUCTION

Growth modulating spinal implants are used in the management of scoliosis such as anterior vertebral body tethering. A motion-sparing posterior device (PDDC) was recently approved for the treatment of moderate AIS. The purpose of this study was to determine if the PDDC can modulate growth in skeletally immature patients with AIS.

METHODS

From a database of patients treated with the PDDC over 4 years, we identified those who had a minimum of 2 years follow-up. Pre-operative and post-operative Cobb angles and coronal plane wedging of the apical vertebra were evaluated on standing full length radiographs. Independent sample t test and one-way ANOVA with post-hoc Tukey HSD analysis was used to compare three groups in varying skeletal maturity: Risser 0-1, Risser 2-3, and Risser 4-5.

RESULTS

45 patients (14.2-years old, 11-17) were evaluated with a mean pre-op curve of 46° (35°-66°). The average preoperative major curve magnitude, of either Lenke 1 or 5 curve type, was similar among the three groups 47.6°, 46° and 41.5°. Deformity correction was similar in the three groups, with reduction to 26.4°, 20.4° and 26.2°, respectively, at final follow-up [p < 0.05]. Pre-op wedging 7.4° (3.8°-15°) was reduced after surgery to 5.7° (1°-15°) (p < 0.05). Of those patients, Risser 0-1 (n = 16) had preoperative wedging of 9.5° (6°-14.5°) that was reduced to 5.4° (1°-8°) postoperatively (p < 0.05); Risser 2-3 (n = 15) had pre-op 7.7° (4°-15°) vs. post-op 7.0° (3°-15°); Risser 4-5 (n = 14) had pre-op 4.8° (3.8°-6.5°) vs. post-op 4.7° (3.7°-6.5°). Delta Wedging in Risser 0-1 stage was significantly different than for Risser 2-3 and for Risser 4-5.

CONCLUSION

The posterior dynamic deformity correction device was able to modulate vertebral body wedging in skeletally immature patients with AIS. This was most evident in patients who were Risser 0-1. In contrast, curve correction was similar among the three groups. This finding lends support to the device's ability to modulate growth.