Prediction of post-operative adding-on or compensatory lumbar curve correction after anterior vertebral body tethering

Matched comparison of non-fusion surgeries for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis: posterior dynamic distraction device and vertebral body tethering

PURPOSE

Two non-fusion devices for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) received HDE approval for clinical use in 2019: posterior dynamic distraction device (PDDD) and vertebral body tethering system (VBT). Although indications are similar, there is no comparative study of these devices. We hypothesize that curve correction will be comparable, but PDDD will have better perioperative metrics.

METHODS

AIS PDDD patients were prospectively enrolled in this matched multicenter study. Inclusion criteria were Lenke 1 or 5 curves, preoperative curves 35°-60°, correction to ≤30° on bending radiographs, and kyphosis <55°. Patients were matched by age, sex, Risser, curve type and curve magnitude to a single-center cohort of VBT patients. Results were compared at 2 years.

RESULTS

20 PDDD patients were matched to 20 VBT patients. Blood loss was higher in the VBT cohort (88 vs. 36 ml, p < 0.001). Operative time and postoperative length of stay were longer in the VBT cohort, 177 vs. 115 min (p < 0.001) (2.9 vs. 1.2 days, p < 0.001). Postoperative curve measurement and correction at 6 months were better in the PDDD cohort (15° vs. 24°, p < 0.001; 68% vs. 50%, p < 0.001). At 1-year, PDDD patients had improved Cobb angles (14° vs. 21°, p = 0.001). At 2 years, a correction was improved in the PDDD cohort, with a curve measurement of 17° for PDDD and 22° for VBT (p = 0.043). At the latest follow-up, 3 PDDD patients and 1 VBT patient underwent revision surgery.

CONCLUSION

Early results show PDDD demonstrates better index correction, reduced operative time, less blood loss, and shorter length of stay but higher rates of revision compared to a matched cohort of VBT patients at two-year follow-up.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level II, prospective cohort matched comparative study.

Vertebral Body Tethering in Skeletally Immature Patients: Results of a Prospective U.S. FDA Investigational Device Exemption Study

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to report on 2-year results of vertebral body tethering (VBT), performed under a Food and Drug Administration protocol, to obtain insight into outcomes and complications.

METHODS

Forty prospectively enrolled patients with adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) who had a Sanders score of ≤4 or a Risser score of ≤2 underwent VBT for curves between 40° and 70°. Surgical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes were reviewed at a minimum 2-year follow-up.

RESULTS

Mean age at surgery was 13 (range, 10 to 16) years. The 40 patients were 90% female; 95% White, 2.5% other, and 2.5% unreported; and 92.5% non-Hispanic, 5% Hispanic, and 2.5% unreported. A mean of 8 (range, 5 to 12) levels were instrumented. Most patients were at Sanders 4 (65%) and Risser 0 (63%). Mean length of stay was 3 ± 1 days, estimated blood loss was 236 ± 158 (range, 25 to 740) mL, and operative time was 4.4 ± 1.4 hours. Mean correction of the major curve was 44% (range, 22% to 95%) on the 3-month standing radiograph, 49% at 1 year, and 46% (range, -10% to 93%) at 2 years. The mean major Cobb angle improved from 51° ± 8° (range, 40° to 70°) preoperatively to 27° ± 11° (range, 3° to 56°) at 2 years. Success at 2 years, defined by a Cobb angle of <35° and no reoperation, was seen in 30 patients (75%) and was associated with a mean Cobb angle of <35° on the first postoperative standing radiograph (p < 0.001). Twelve patients (30%) demonstrated improvement in the curve with growth. By 2 years, 2 (5%) of the patients underwent repeat surgery (1 release for overcorrection, 1 lumbar VBT for lumbar curve progression after thoracic VBT). The Scoliosis Research Society (SRS) satisfaction score improved 2 years following surgery (p < 0.001), but other SRS domains only remained stable over time. Beyond 2 years, 1 additional lumbar tether was required after thoracic VBT, 1 implant was removed, and 3 fusions were performed, for a 10% fusion rate and overall 20% reoperation rate at a mean of 3.8 ± 1.1 years of follow-up. The rate of cord breakage in the study population was 20%.

CONCLUSIONS

In skeletally immature patients treated in the U.S. under a prospective Investigational Device Exemption, there was a 75% rate of successful outcomes at 2 years. Most correction was obtained at the time of surgery, and inadequate intraoperative curve correction was associated with a higher Cobb angle on the first postoperative standing radiograph and failure by 2 years.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic Level II. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Tether pre-tension within vertebral body tethering reduces motion of the spine and influences coupled motion: a finite element analysis

Anterior Vertebral Body Tethering (VBT) is a novel fusionless treatment option for selected adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients which is gaining widespread interest. The primary objective of this study is to investigate the effects of tether pre-tension within VBT on the biomechanics of the spine including sagittal and transverse parameters as well as primary motion, coupled motion, and stresses acting on the L2 superior endplate. For that purpose, we used a calibrated and validated Finite Element model of the L1-L2 spine. The VBT instrumentation was inserted on the left side of the L1-L2 segment with different cord pre-tensions and submitted to an external pure moment of 6 Nm in different directions. The range of motion (ROM) for the instrumented spine was measured from the initial post-VBT position. The magnitudes of the ROM of the native spine and VBT-instrumented with pre-tensions of 100 N, 200 N, and 300 N were, respectively, 3.29°, 2.35°, 1.90° and 1.61° in extension, 3.30°, 3.46°, 2.79°, and 2.17° in flexion, 2.11°, 1.67°, 1.33° and 1.06° in right axial rotation, and 2.10°, 1.88°, 1.48° and 1.16° in left axial rotation. During flexion-extension, an insignificant coupled lateral bending motion was observed in the native spine. However, VBT instrumentation with pre-tensions of 100 N, 200 N, and 300 N generated coupled right lateral bending of 0.85°, 0.81°, and 0.71° during extension and coupled left lateral bending of 0.32°, 0.24°, and 0.19° during flexion, respectively. During lateral bending, a coupled extension motion of 0.33-0.40° is observed in the native spine, but VBT instrumentation with pre-tensions of 100 N, 200 N, and 300 N generates coupled flexion of 0.67°, 0.58°, and 0.42° during left (side of the implant) lateral bending and coupled extension of 1.28°, 1.07°, and 0.87° during right lateral bending, respectively. Therefore, vertebral body tethering generates coupled motion. Tether pre-tension within vertebral body tethering reduces the motion of the spine.