The Impact of Living with Clubfoot on Children and Their Families: Perspectives from Two Cultural Environments

The Core outcome Clubfoot (CoCo) study: relapse, with poorer clinical and quality of life outcomes, affects 37% of idiopathic clubfoot patients

Aims

There is a lack of high-quality research investigating outcomes of Ponseti-treated idiopathic clubfeet and correlation with relapse. This study assessed clinical and quality of life (QoL) outcomes using a standardized core outcome set (COS), comparing children with and without relapse.

Methods

A total of 11 international centres participated in this institutional review board-approved observational study. Data including demographics, information regarding presentation, treatment, and details of subsequent relapse and management were collected between 1 June 2022 and 30 June 2023 from consecutive clinic patients who had a minimum five-year follow-up. The clubfoot COS incorporating 31 parameters was used. A regression model assessed relationships between baseline variables and outcomes (clinical/QoL).

Results

Overall, 293 patients (432 feet) with a median age of 89 months (interquartile range 72 to 113) were included. The relapse rate was 37%, with repeated relapse in 14%. Treatment considered a standard part of the Ponseti journey (recasting, repeat tenotomy, and tibialis anterior tendon transfer) was performed in 35% of cases, with soft-tissue release and osteotomies in 5% and 2% of cases, respectively. Predictors of relapse included duration of follow-up, higher initial Pirani score, and poor Evertor muscle activity. Relapse was associated with poorer outcomes.

Conclusion

This is the first multicentre study using a standardized COS following clubfoot treatment. It distinguishes patients with and without relapse in terms of clinical outcomes and QoL, with poorer outcomes in the relapse group. This tool allows comparison of treatment methods and outcomes, facilitates information sharing, and sets family expectations. Predictors of relapse encourage us to create appropriate treatment pathways to reduce relapse and improve outcome.

Comparing patient-reported outcomes of the Oxford Ankle and Foot Questionnaire in children with clubfoot from two different geographic and cultural environments: a cohort study in India and Canada

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study is to compare the results of the Oxford Ankle and Foot Questionnaire (OxAFQ) in children with clubfoot in Canada and India to assess its ability to predict outcomes and capture patient experiences in different cultural contexts.

METHODS

This is a retrospective study of children with clubfoot in India and Canada who completed the OxAFQ. Statistical analyses were implemented on registry-collected data to test for independent predictors of poor outcomes and compare scores between countries, among children and their parents, and in Canada where relapse data was collected and the effect of a relapse on scores.

RESULTS

A total of 361 children were included. The mean Indian OxAFQ scores were higher (p < 0.001) in all domains. Pirani score, tenotomy, laterality, and age at presentation were found to be predictive of outcomes between the sites (p < 0.05). OxAFQ scores decreased after relapse for children in Canada (p < 0.05). Canadian children were found to generally have lower OxAFQ scores in all domains compared to their parents (n = 95; Z = -3.178, -3.493, -3.353, and -3.635 for physical, school and play, emotion, and footwear, respectively; p < 0.001). Indian parents and children showed no significant differences in their scores.

CONCLUSIONS

A difference was observed in scores between both sites, suggesting there may be differences in how these populations assess personal health outcomes. These findings support the need for cultural validity of patient-reported outcome measures.

A 'Hub and Spoke' Shared Care initiative for CTEV Ponseti service

Aims

The Ponseti method is the gold standard treatment for congenital talipes equinovarus (CTEV), with the British Consensus Statement providing a benchmark for standard of care. Meeting these standards and providing expert care while maintaining geographical accessibility can pose a service delivery challenge. A novel 'Hub and Spoke' Shared Care model was initiated to deliver Ponseti treatment for CTEV, while addressing standard of care and resource allocation. The aim of this study was to assess feasibility and outcomes of the corrective phase of Ponseti service delivery using this model.

Methods

Patients with idiopathic CTEV were seen in their local hospitals ('Spokes') for initial diagnosis and casting, followed by referral to the tertiary hospital ('Hub') for tenotomy. Non-idiopathic CTEV was managed solely by the Hub. Primary and secondary outcomes were achieving primary correction, and complication rates resulting in early transfer to the Hub, respectively. Consecutive data were prospectively collected and compared between patients allocated to Hub or Spokes. Mann-Whitney U test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, or chi-squared tests were used for analysis (alpha-priori = 0.05, two-tailed significance).

Results

Between 1 March 2020 and 31 March 2023, 92 patients (139 feet) were treated at the service (Hub 50%, n = 46; Spokes 50%, n = 46), of whom nine were non-idiopathic. All patients (n = 92), regardless of allocation, ultimately achieved primary correction, with idiopathic patients at the Hub requiring fewer casts than the Spokes (mean 4.0 (SD 1.4) vs 6.9 (SD 4.4); p < 0.001). Overall, 60.9% of Spokes' patients (n = 28/46) required transfer to the Hub due to complications (cast slips Hub n = 2; Spokes n = 17; p < 0.001). These patients ultimately achieved full correction at the Hub.

Conclusion

The Shared Care model was found to be feasible in terms of providing primary correction to all patients, with results comparable to other published services. Complication rates were higher at the Spokes, although these were correctable. Future research is needed to assess long-term outcomes, parents' satisfaction, and cost-effectiveness.