The effect of nifedipine on serum digoxin concentrations in patients

Calcium channel blockers: spectrum of side effects and drug interactions

Calcium antagonists are a chemically heterogenous group of agents with potent cardiovascular effects which are beneficial in the treatment of angina pectoris, arterial hypertension and cardiac arrhythmias. The main side effects for the group are dose-dependent and the result of the main action or actions of the calcium antagonists, i.e. vasodilatation, negative inotropic effects and antiarrhythmic effects. Pronounced hypotension is reported for the main calcium antagonist drugs; verapamil, diltiazem and nifedipine. While conduction disturbances and bradycardia are seen more often after verapamil and diltiazem, tachycardia, headache and flush are more frequent after nifedipine. Constipation is relatively frequent after verapamil while nifedipine is reported to induce diarrhea in som patients. Idiosyncratic side effects are rare but have been reported from the skin, mouth, musculoskeletal system, the liver and the central nervous system. These side effects include urticarial rashes, gingival hyperplasia, arthralgia, hepathotoxicity and transistory mental confusion or akathisia. Verapamil, diltiazem and possibly also nifedipine have been reported to increase serum digoxin concentrations but the clinical relevance of these drug interactions are not clear. Furthermore, verapamil and diltiazem may potentiate the effects of beta-adrenergic blocking drugs and verapamil may also potentiate the effects of neuromuscular blocking drugs. It is concluded that side effects after calcium antagonist drugs are mostly trivial and transient although they may sometimes be relatively common. Clinically relevant drug interactions are few. Judged from the point of efficacy and safety, calcium antagonists will have a major place in the future pharmacotherapy of several cardiovascular disorders.

Pharmacoepidemiologic detection of calcium channel blocker-induced change on digoxin clearance using multiple trough screen analysis

Nonlinear mixed effects modeling was used to estimate the effects of digoxin-calcium channel blockers (verapamil, diltiazem, nifedipine) in 336 serum levels gathered from 172 patients (104 male and 68 female) receiving oral digoxin as hospital in-patients. The final model describing digoxin clearance (CL) was CL (l/day)=(87.9+2.71C(cr))0.872(CCB)0.880(CHF)0.937(SPI)0.854(DFAC), where C(cr) is the estimated creatinine clearance (ml/min); CCB=1 for concomitant administration of calcium channel blockers and CCB=zero otherwise; CHF=1 for the patients with congestive heart failure and CHF=zero otherwise; SPI=1 for concomitant administration of spironolactone and SPI=zero otherwise; DFAC=1 for administration of a half-tablet of digoxin and DFAC=zero otherwise. Concomitant administration of calcium channel blockers resulted in a 13% decrease in digoxin relative clearance.

Calcium antagonists in the elderly. A risk-benefit analysis

Calcium antagonists are effective in lowering blood pressure, relieving anginal symptoms and improving exercise tolerance in older and younger patients with coronary artery disease. Verapamil and diltiazem are effective in slowing ventricular response rates to supraventricular arrhythmias in both older and younger patients. Although they belong to at least 3 distinct chemical classes, a moderate decrease in the clearance of all calcium antagonists occurs with aging. Most clinical trials of these drugs have used the same dosages in older and younger patients, confounding analyses of sensitivity in older compared with younger patients. Greater reductions in blood pressure usually occur in older compared with younger patients receiving the same dosages of calcium antagonists; similarly, the dosage required to reduce blood pressure to a certain level is usually lower in older compared with younger patients. Drug acquisition costs are generally higher for calcium antagonists than for beta-blockers or diuretics. Compared with younger patients, greater heart rate suppression may be seen in older patients treated with verapamil and diltiazem; conversely, heart rate increases are usually seen with dihydropyridines. Calcium antagonists have not been shown to provide long-term benefits or decreased morbidity or mortality in elderly patients with hypertension. Verapamil, but not dihydropyridines, decreases mortality after myocardial infarction in patients without congestive heart failure. Calcium antagonists have not been shown to be beneficial in the treatment of acute stroke. Adverse effects, such as a postural hypotension, may be more frequent in elderly compared with younger patients. In addition, the elderly are at greater risk for drug interactions with calcium antagonists due to the higher likelihood that they are receiving other drugs.

Ca2+ channel antagonists inhibit the intestinal absorption of digoxin in the guinea-pig

Simultaneous administration of digoxin and Ca2+ channel antagonists results in an increased plasma level of digoxin. A possible mechanism underlying this interaction might be the influence of Ca2+ channel antagonists on the enteral absorption of digoxin. To study this interaction, two groups of experiments were performed with guinea-pigs. In the first group, the influence of Ca2+ channel antagonists on the rate of enteral absorption of digoxin in vivo was studied. In the second group, the influence of Ca2+ channel antagonists on the transfer of digoxin through the wall of the isolated everted small intestine in vitro was investigated. The intravenously determined minimal lethal dose of digoxin 30 min after its intraduodenal administration was increased in animals pretreated with either verapamil, diltiazem, nifedipine or nicardipine. Addition of either verapamil or diltiazem to the solution on the mucosal side of isolated everted small intestine sacs decreased the transfer of digoxin through the intestinal wall. Similar results obtained in both groups indicate that, under our experimental conditions, Ca2+ channel antagonists inhibit the enteral absorption of digoxin in the guinea-pig.

Pharmacokinetic interactions with calcium channel antagonists (Part II)

Since calcium channel antagonists are a diverse class of drugs frequently administered in combination with other agents, the potential for clinically significant pharmacokinetic drug interactions exists. These interactions occur most frequently via altered hepatic blood flow and impaired hepatic enzyme activity. Part I of the article, which appeared in the previous issue of the Journal, dealt with interactions between calcium antagonists and marker compounds, theophylline, midazolam, lithium, doxorubicin, oral hypoglycaemics and cardiac drugs. Part II examines interactions with cyclosporin, anaesthetics, carbamazepine and cardiovascular agents.

Calcium channel antagonists: Part VI: Clinical pharmacokinetics of first and second-generation agents

A survey of the pharmacokinetic properties of the three prototypical calcium antagonist agents shows that they have in common a very high rate of hepatic first-pass metabolism with, in the case of verapamil and diltiazem, the formation of an active metabolite that affects the dose during chronic therapy. Therefore, the major factor altering the pharmacokinetic properties and the dose of the drug required is the capacity of the liver to metabolize the drug, which in turn depends on the hepatic blood flow and the activity of the hepatic metabolizing systems. Hence liver disease, a low cardiac output, and coadministration of certain drugs inducing or inhibiting the hepatic enzymes, all indirectly affect the pharmacokinetic properties of the calcium antagonists. There are also other potential drug interactions of a kinetic or dynamic nature that may arise. In general, renal disease has little effect on the pharmacokinetics of calcium antagonists.

Effects of felodipine on plasma digoxin levels and haemodynamics in patients with heart failure

The interaction between felodipine and digoxin was studied after a single oral dose and at steady state in 14 patients with congestive heart failure. Felodipine (10 mg) was randomly given as an extended release (FER) tablet in a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over fashion. In addition, felodipine (10 mg) was given openly as a plain tablet, following the double-blind period. Each period lasted for 7 d. Felodipine ER did not alter the pharmacokinetics of digoxin when given as a single dose or at steady state compared with placebo. At steady state the felodipine plain tablet resulted in an 11% increase (P less than 0.05) in peak plasma concentrations of digoxin. Systolic time intervals as noninvasively measured haemodynamic parameters were not significantly altered following the felodipine ER period, while the felodipine plain tablet significantly decreased the pre-ejection/left ventricular ejection time ratio compared to placebo.

Pharmacokinetic interactions with digoxin

Numerous pharmacological agents have been shown to produce clinically significant pharmacokinetic interactions with digoxin. Drugs which reduce digoxin absorption include the antacids aluminium hydroxide, magnesium hydroxide and magnesium trisilicate, the antidiarrhoeals kaolin and pectin, the hypocholesterolaemic agent cholestyramine and the chemotoxins cyclophosphamide, vincristine and bleomycin. Certain antibiotics including sulphasalazine, neomycin and aminosalicylic acid reduce digoxin absorption while others, including erythromycin and tetracycline, increase the bioavailability of digoxin in some patients. Capsule preparations of digoxin in solution are less subject to several of the interactions which affect the absorption and bioavailability of digoxin tablets. Various drugs induce alterations in the volume of distribution and clearance of digoxin. Cardiac patients receiving digoxin therapy are particularly prone to interactions with commonly co-administered medications such as the antiarrhythmics quinidine and amiodarone, the calcium channel blockers verapamil and nifedipine, and possibly some vasodilating agents. Studies of digoxin interactions have yielded discrepant results, indicating the need for careful analysis of investigational design before arriving at clinical conclusions.

Calcium channel antagonists. Part IV: Side effects and contraindications drug interactions and combinations

With the correct selection of drug and patient, the calcium antagonists as a group can be remarkably effective at relatively low cost of serious side effects. Almost all side effects are dose related. Minor side effects include those caused by vasodilation (flushing and headaches), constipation (verapamil), and ankle edema. Serious side effects are rare and result from improper use of these agents, as when intravenous verapamil (or diltiazem) is given to patients with sinus or atrioventricular nodal depression from drugs or disease, or nifedipine to patients with aortic stenosis. The potential of a marked negative inotropic effect is usually offset by afterload reduction, especially in the case of nifedipine which actually has the most marked negative inotropic effect. Yet caution is required when even calcium antagonists, especially verapamil, are given to patients with myocardial failure unless caused by hypertensive heart disease. Drug interactions of calcium antagonists occur with other cardiovascular agents such as alpha-adrenergic blockers, beta-adrenergic blockers, digoxin, quinidine, and disopyramide. The most marked interaction with digoxin is that with verapamil, which may raise digoxin levels by over 50%. Combination therapy of calcium antagonists with beta-blockers is increasingly common, and is probably safest in the case of dihydropyridines. Other combinations being explored are those with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and diuretics.

Effects of oral prazosin on total plasma digoxin levels

Prazosin and digoxin are frequently coadministered in clinical practice. To determine the effects of oral prazosin treatment on steady-state digoxin levels, 20 patients receiving a constant maintenance dose of digoxin, who had normal renal and liver functions and were not receiving any other treatment, were given 5 mg of prazosin for 3 days. Plasma digoxin levels were measured before, on days 1 and 3 of prazosin treatment, and after prazosin had been discontinued. It was found that prazosin significantly increased plasma digoxin levels. On discontinuation of prazosin digoxin levels returned to their previous values.

Digoxin-felodipine interaction in patients with congestive heart failure

A possible interaction between felodipine and digoxin was studied in 23 patients with congestive heart failure before and after 8 weeks treatment with both drugs. A modest, non-significant increase in serum digoxin level 2 h postdose (+15%) was found in the felodipine group (n = 11) compared to placebo (n = 12), with no change in the trough and 6 h postdose levels. There was a bimodal distribution of the observed changes in serum digoxin level 2 h postdose: a significant increase (p less than 0.001) was observed only in patients with a high plasma felodipine level, which may have been caused by changes in the absorption rate in those patients. Changes in the elimination of digoxin after felodipine therapy appeared unlikely, since the trough and 6 h post-dose levels were unchanged. Analysis of the clinical characteristics, haemodynamics and laboratory values revealed no significant differences between the subgroups. The observed increase in serum digoxin warrants monitoring the trough and peak levels digoxin in patients with congestive heart failure who are also being treated with felodipine.

Pharmacokinetic drug interactions between digoxin and antiarrhythmic agents and calcium channel blocking agents: an appraisal of study methodology

While preliminary screening for interactions between new cardiovascular pharmacotherapeutic agents and digoxin can be efficiently and safely conducted in normal healthy volunteers, it is particularly important to detect and quantify drug interactions in patients with varying degrees of cardiac, hepatic and/or renal dysfunction. Much of the previously published literature provides only minimal data to guide clinical practice because of limitations of study design including sample size and measurement techniques. Important factors that determine the ability of a particular study design to detect a drug interaction with digoxin include the accuracy and precision of the assay method for serum digoxin concentrations, intrasubject and intersubject variability in serum digoxin concentration, and sample size. The format of the trial (chronic versus single digoxin dosing in cardiac patients; chronic versus single digoxin dosing in normal subjects) and the method of assessment of alterations in digoxin handling (formal determination of digoxin clearance, comparison of multiple or single digoxin measurements during various phases of trial) also impact greatly on the clinical relevance of such investigations. Guidelines for future studies of drug interactions with digoxin in cardiac patients are proposed with particular emphasis on laboratory methods; measurement techniques during baseline, placebo, and active drug phases; calculation of the statistical power of the study; time course of the trial; and assessment of the clinical significance of the findings.

Pharmacokinetics of felodipine and effect on digoxin plasma levels in patients with heart failure

Some calcium antagonist drugs used in hypertension and cardiac diseases have been shown to increase plasma digoxin levels mainly as a result of reduced renal clearance. Felodipine is a new dihydropyridine calcium antagonist drug with cardiovascular effects, whose pharmacokinetics and effects on plasma digoxin levels have been studied in patients with left ventricular failure. 12 patients (11 men) on long term digoxin therapy were given 2.5 or 5 mg felodipine bid for 7 days followed by 1 week on 10mg bid. Plasma levels of digoxin and felodipine were measured before dosage and 30, 60 and 90 minutes and 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10 and 24 hours after the first dose and after 1 week of therapy (steady state). The area under plasma concentration versus time curve was calculated after the first dose and in steady state both for digoxin and felodipine. The absorption characteristics Cmax and Tmax were calculated both for felodipine and digoxin on the different felodipine doses. There was a linear relationship between dose and plasma level of felodipine. Plasma half-life in the 4- to 10-hour period of felodipine was 5.5 hours after a 10mg single dose, and 12 hours after 10mg bid. Felodipine 2.5mg, 5mg and 10mg all transiently increased peak plasma digoxin concentrations (by about 40%) at 1 hour after intake. Urinary excretion of digoxin during the day was unchanged, but impaired renal clearance may account for the transient increase in digoxin plasma level after felodipine.

Clinical digoxin toxicity in the aged in association with co-administered verapamil. A report of two cases and review of the literature

Digoxin toxicity occurs more commonly in aged than younger individuals. Cardioactive drugs such as quinidine effect digoxin pharmacokinetics so as to increase the potential for digoxin toxicity. The calcium-channel antagonists have become extensively used for cardiac disorders and are often co-administered with digoxin. Despite documented calcium-channel antagonist interactions with digoxin, clinically significant digoxin toxicity associated with their concurrent use is apparently unusual. Two elderly patients receiving digoxin and verapamil simultaneously are presented to demonstrate the clinical importance and potential danger of the concomitant use of these drugs.

Influence of nisoldipine on haemodynamic effects and plasma levels of digoxin

In a placebo controlled double-blind study including 10 patients with heart failure the nisoldipine/digoxin interaction was studied. Nisoldipine was shown to elevate digoxin plasma concentrations significantly by about 15% (trough levels). During chronic combination therapy with nisoldipine trough levels and plasma concentrations 4 h after the morning dose of digoxin were 1.35 +/- 0.14 and 1.92 +/- 0.16 ng ml-1 respectively, whereas they averaged to 1.16 +/- 0.14 and 1.52 +/- 0.16 ng ml-1 with digoxin and placebo (P less than 0.05; mean +/- s.e. mean). Systolic time intervals were significantly altered by nisoldipine co-administration compared with digoxin plus placebo. In certain patients the elevation of digoxin plasma levels due to nisoldipine co-administration could be of clinical relevance.

Evaluation of the pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic interaction between calcium antagonists and digoxin

Therapeutic uses of calcium antagonists have expanded to include not only ischemic heart disease but arrhythmias, systemic hypertension, congestive heart failure, and various pulmonary and gastrointestinal diseases. Many patients receiving a calcium antagonist concomitantly receive digoxin. Although the potential interaction between these agents has frequently been investigated, literature reports are confusing and inconsistent. We summarized the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, and mechanisms of interaction to help clinicians evaluate the potential calcium antagonist-digoxin interaction.

Digoxin-diltiazem interaction: a pharmacokinetic evaluation

The pharmacokinetics of digoxin were studied before and after a 2 week course of diltiazem, 30 mg four times daily, in 7 healthy volunteers. Each subject received an IV dose of digoxin before starting diltiazem and again on day 15 of the study. Diltiazem was continued until all sera and urine were collected. During the control and diltiazem phases, respectively, the terminal elimination rate constants were 0.0231 +/- 0.007 h-1 and 0.0254 +/- 0.007 h-1, the volumes of distribution were 10.5 +/- 3.95 l/kg and 10.2 +/- 3.26 l/kg, and the total body clearances were 3.72 +/- 0.78 ml X min-1 X kg-1 and 4.09 +/- 0.94 ml X min-1 X kg-1. None of these pharmacokinetic parameters of digoxin were significantly different before or during diltiazem administration. Overall, there does not appear to be an interaction between digoxin and diltiazem.

Dose-dependence of the nifedipine/digoxin interaction?

The dose-dependence of the nifedipine/digoxin interaction was investigated in seven healthy volunteers. After an adequate loading dose of digoxin for two weeks, 0.25 mg digoxin was given alone orally twice daily. Afterwards, 0.25 mg digoxin was administered twice daily for three one week periods combined with capsules of nifedipine 5 mg, 10 mg or 20 mg (ADA-LAT) respectively on a three times daily basis. Subsequently the study was completed with a digoxin monotherapy phase lasting seven days. All three doses of nifedipine administered led to a significant increase of the digoxin plasma concentrations and of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) compared with digoxin monotherapy. In conclusion, nifedipine causes a slight but significant increase of digoxin plasma concentrations and of its AUC (15%). This effect was not dependent on the nifedipine dose administered.

Individualization of calcium entry-blocker dosage for systemic hypertension

The calcium entry blockers are used in a wide variety of clinical situations. Coexisting disease states, such as renal or hepatic dysfunction, may require individualized dosing of these agents. The physiologic changes associated with aging may also affect the pharmacokinetic properties of the drugs. If calcium entry blockers are used concurrently with other medications, dosage adjustment or selection of an alternative drug may be needed. Drug interactions between calcium entry blockers and cimetidine, digoxin and quinidine appear to be clinically significant. Individualized dosing in patients who have coexisting disease or who are using other medications is essential to achieve an adequate therapeutic response and avoid adverse effects. Considerations to attain an optimal response in such situations are presented.

Effects of verapamil on pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of digitoxin in patients

Investigations by various teams have shown that combined treatment with verapamil and digoxin may result in a marked increase in digoxin plasma concentrations, necessitating a reduction in the dose of digoxin. This is mainly due to an impairment of the renal digoxin excretion. Unlike digoxin, the excretion of digitoxin is independent of renal function. A prospective clinical study was therefore planned to investigate the influence of a daily dose of 240 mg of verapamil on pharmacokinetics and the cardiac effect of digitoxin after a single dose (n = 3) and under steady-state conditions (n = 10). While pretreatment with verapamil did not alter pharmacokinetics of digitoxin in the single-dose study, there was a slight rise of digitoxin plasma concentrations (an average of 35% in 8 out of 10 patients) following administration of verapamil for a period of 4 to 6 weeks. Renal excretion of digitoxin, however, was not changed significantly. Simultaneous with a rise of digitoxin plasma concentrations and until a new steady state was reached, PQ interval was prolonged and T wave flattening intensified. On the other hand, the antagonistic effect on contractility which was initially observed after verapamil administration was diminished. Based on these observations, it can be concluded that the risk of digitalis overdose after combined treatment with verapamil and digitoxin may be less pronounced than after digoxin, and that this glycoside can prove a valuable alternative.

[Pharmacokinetic and cardiac efficacy of beta-acetyldigoxin and digitoxin in combination therapy with diltiazem]

The effect of diltiazem (D) on the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of beta-acetyldigoxin (AD; n = 12) and digitoxin (DGT; n = 10) was studied in 22 patients with cardiac insufficiency stages II-III by the New York Heart Association. Glycoside plasma concentration and renal excretion as well as electrocardiogram [heart rate, atrioventricular transconduction time (PQ), duration of electrical systole corrected for heart rate (QTc), mean amplitude of T-waves in leads V2 to V6 (TV2-6)] and systole time intervals [total electromechanical systole index (QS21), left ventricular ejection time index (LVETI), pre-ejection period index (PEPI), PEP/LVET ratio] were recorded repeatedly before and during co-administration of 180 mg/day D. In eight patients digoxin plasma levels increased continuously during additional D administration. After reaching a new steady state at 0.93 +/- 0.35 ng/ml digoxin concentrations were at an average 43% higher than before D administration (0.65 +/- 0.27 ng/ml) with a simultaneous increase in renal glycoside excretion. The other four patients showed neither changes in digoxin concentrations in plasma nor in renal glycoside excretion. Only half the patients treated with DGT and D revealed an increase in DGT plasma levels of 21.4%. Daily renal glycoside excretion was not altered by D administration. In accordance to the increasing AD plasma concentration, PQ-interval was prolonged and T-wave flattening was intensified, whereas the systolic time intervals after concomitant treatment of AD and D did not differ from those after AD alone.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Digoxin and nifedipine

Many investigators have studied the potential interactions between calcium-channel antagonists and digoxin. Digoxin is usually well absorbed, and its excretion is dependent on renal mechanisms, primarily glomerular filtration. Several studies have reported a decrease in digoxin clearance and an increase of approximately 50% in digoxin levels when verapamil was added to digoxin therapy. Because renal digoxin clearance was decreased but no concomitant change in creatinine clearance was shown, the presumed major mechanism for decreased renal digoxin clearance is an alteration in renal tubular secretion of digoxin. Although an early report described a digoxin-nifedipine interaction, several subsequent studies have shown no significant changes in digoxin kinetics during nifedipine administration. Four studies found no significant decrease in creatinine clearance of digoxin during nifedipine administration. Thus significant changes in glomerular filtration are unlikely. Physiologic endpoints were measured by 2 groups describing a digoxin-nifedipine interaction and, although there was an increase in serum digoxin concentration, no changes were found in electrophysiologic correlates. Thus, if a digoxin-nifedipine interaction does exist, steady-state digoxin levels might increase from 24 to 45% when nifedipine therapy is added. Studies to date have involved small numbers of subjects with and without cardiac disease and have used different study protocols. Nonetheless, little evidence exists for any clinically significant increase in physiologic effects and no adverse effects have been found in patients receiving combined nifedipine and digoxin.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between digoxin and other drugs

Drug interactions with digoxin are important because of this agent's narrow therapeutic index. Among the drugs that can decrease digoxin bioavailability are cholestyramine, antacid gels, kaolin-pectate, certain antimicrobial drugs and cancer chemotherapeutic agents. In selected patients, antibiotics may enhance digoxin bioavailability by eliminating intestinal flora that metabolize digoxin. Antiarrhythmic drugs, such as quinidine and amiodarone, can markedly increase steady state serum digoxin levels. Certain calcium channel blocking drugs, particularly verapamil, have a similar effect. Potassium-sparing diuretic drugs, such as spironolactone, can alter digoxin pharmacokinetics. Indomethacin may decrease renal excretion of digoxin in preterm infants. Finally, rifampin, an antibiotic used in the treatment of tuberculosis, may lower steady state serum digoxin levels in patients with severe renal disease. Physicians must maintain constant vigilance whenever medications are added to or withdrawn from a therapeutic regimen that includes digoxin.

Effect of diltiazem on renal clearance and serum concentration of digoxin in patients with cardiac disease

The effect of diltiazem on digoxin serum concentration was evaluated in 9 patients who had been treated chronically for heart disease with digoxin, 0.25 mg/day. The indications for digoxin therapy were arrhythmias in 5 patients and mild heart failure in the other 4. Renal digoxin clearance was also evaluated in 8 of these patients. Serum digoxin concentration was measured at control, 7 +/- 2 days after initiation of 120 mg/day of diltiazem and 11 +/- 5 days after increasing the dose of diltiazem to 240 mg/day. Serum digoxin concentration was 0.9 +/- 0.4 ng/ml at control, 0.8 +/- 0.4 ng/ml with 120 mg/day of diltiazem, and 0.8 +/- 0.3 ng/ml during therapy with 240 mg/day. The differences between these values were not significant. Renal digoxin clearance also did not show a significant change after diltiazem therapy (44 +/- 15 ml/min before diltiazem and 46 +/- 13 ml/min with 240 mg/day of diltiazem). This study shows no effect of diltiazem in doses of 120 to 240 mg/day on serum digoxin concentration or renal digoxin clearance in patients who are treated chronically for heart disease with digoxin. In this dose range, diltiazem has advantages over verapamil, which markedly elevates digoxin levels.