Comparison of the efficacy and safety of esmolol, a short-acting beta blocker, with placebo in the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. The Esmolol vs Placebo Multicenter Study Group

Keeping It "Current": A Review of Treatment Options for the Management of Supraventricular Tachycardia

OBJECTIVE

To review treatment options and updates that exist for the management of paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia (PSVT).

DATA SOURCES

A literature search of PubMed was performed including articles from 1974 to June 2023 using the terms: arrhythmias, adenosine, verapamil, diltiazem, esmolol, propranolol, metoprolol, beta-blockers, amiodarone, PSVT, synchronized cardioversion, methylxanthines, dipyridamole, pediatrics, heart transplant, and pregnancy. Primary literature and guidelines were reviewed.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Studies were considered if they were available in English and conducted in humans.

DATA SYNTHESIS

PSVT is a subset of supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) that presents as a rapid, regular tachycardia with an abrupt onset and termination. Due to frequent emergency department (ED) visits annually with symptoms of PSVT, appropriate and efficient management of these patients is vital. This review provides an overview of the pathophysiology of PSVT, while also describing the literature behind nonpharmacologic and pharmacologic management of PSVT.

RELEVANCE TO PATIENT CARE AND CLINICAL PRACTICE

This review describes new literature regarding the improved success of the modified Valsalva maneuver as a nonpharmacologic therapy in PSVT. In addition, it describes a new technique in administration of adenosine that has improved outcomes, defines dose adjustments needed for drug interactions with adenosine, compares the utilization of nondihydropyridine calcium channel blockers with adenosine, and provides management recommendations for patients in special populations.

CONCLUSIONS

With high annual rates of ED visits for SVT, providers should be aware of the data behind management and modifications of therapy based on patient-specific factors (ie, patient preference, pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics, drug interactions, and special populations).

Effects of esmolol infusion on cardiovascular parameters and quality of general anaesthesia in younger and older patients

Background: Esmolol is a cardioselective b-adrenergic antagonist that is used during general anaesthesia to blunt the sympathetic reflex tachycardia and hypertension. The aim of the study was to investigate whether the potential beneficial and adverse effects of esmolol differ depending on the patient age. Methods: A total of 50 ASA I/II patients scheduled for elective upper abdominal surgery were divided in two groups: younger (patients aged up to 35 years) and older (patients older than 65). After premedication with Diazepam, they were infused with esmolol during the first 5 min at a rate of 0.3 mg/kg/min and 0.1 mg/kg/min thereafter. Anaesthesia was induced with thiopental sodium 3-5 mg/kg intravenously (iv) and fentanyl 1.5 µg/kg IV. Tracheal intubation was facilitated with suxamethonium 1-2 mg/kg IV. Long-term neuromuscular blockade was induced with pancuronium bromide 0.07 mg/kg IV bolus and maintained with incremental IV boluses of 0.01 mg/ kg. Inhalational anaesthesia was maintained with a mixture of oxygen and nitrous oxide (O2 /N2 O) 2 : 1. Results: The systolic blood pressure remained constant during the intubation phase in the group of older patients, at the same time being around 89 % of the pre-induction values, while in younger patients it rose up to 100 %. During the same phase of anaesthesia, the diastolic blood pressure in older patients remained at about 91 %, while in younger patients it rose up to 107 % of the pre-induction values. The consumption of drugs and the speed and quality of the recovery from anaesthesia did not differ between the two groups of patients. Conclusion: Infusion of esmolol contributes to the concept of general balanced anaesthesia in elective patients scheduled for upper abdominal surgery equally in younger and older patients.

Open-Label Two-Dose Pilot Study of Landiolol for the Treatment of Atrial Fibrillation/Atrial Flutter in Caucasian Patients

BACKGROUND

We investigated for the first time the suitability of landiolol, an ultra-short-acting β1-specific β-blocker, for the treatment of atrial fibrillation/atrial flutter (AF/AFL) in Caucasian patients.

METHODS AND RESULTS

The 20 study patients received landiolol as a continuous infusion (starting dose 40 µg/kg/min) with (B+CI) or without (CI) a preceding bolus dose (100 µg/kg/min administered over 1 min) in a prospective open-label study. The primary endpoint was the proportion of patients with sustained heart rate (HR) reduction ≥20% or to <90 beats/min within 16 min of starting the CI. Secondary endpoints were the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, AF/AFL symptoms, safety and tolerability of landiolol. At 16 min, HR was reduced in all patients treated with landiolol. The primary endpoint was met by 60% of patients in the CI group and 40% in the B+CI group without a significant group difference. Overall reduction of AF/AFL symptoms at 16 min was 72%. Safety and local tolerability of landiolol were excellent, and no serious adverse events occurred.

CONCLUSIONS

Continuous infusion of landiolol with a starting dose of 40 µg/kg/min is suitable for the acute treatment of tachycardic AF/AFL in Caucasian patients. Administration of a preceding bolus seems unnecessary.

Conversion of Atrial Fibrillation to Sinus Rhythm During Treatment With Intravenous Esmolol or Diltiazem: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison

Prior studies have suggested that intravenous diltiazem reduces the probability of spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm in the electrophysiology laboratory and in patients with postoperative AF. Whether diltiazem exerts the same effect in patients presenting to the emergency department (ED) with spontaneous AF is unclear. Fifty patients presenting to the ED with new-onset or paroxysmal AF and a rapid ventricular rate (>100 beats per minute) were randomly assigned to receive intravenous diltiazem or esmolol during the first 24 hours of presentation. Conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 10 patients (42%) in the diltiazem group compared with 10 patients (39%) in the esmolol group ( P = 1.0). Diltiazem does not decrease the likelihood of spontaneous conversion of AF to sinus rhythm in the ED setting.

The effectiveness and safety of landiolol hydrochloride, an ultra-short-acting β1-blocker, in postoperative patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study

Background

Persistent postoperative supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (SVTs) increase cardiac burden and aggravate cardiac hemodynamics. Therefore, for patients in unstable conditions after surgery, prompt and sustained control of heart rate is essential. The importance of β-adrenoceptor antagonists (β-blockers) in controlling such postoperative atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter has been established, and the usefulness of ultra-short-acting β₁-blockers with high β₁ selectivity has been suggested based on their safety and efficacy under such circumstances.

Objectives

Our objectives were to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of landiolol hydrochloride, an ultra-short-acting β₁-selective blocker, in the treatment of postoperative SVT in patients with a high risk of myocardial ischemia, or in patients after highly invasive surgery, in a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, group-comparative study.

Methods

A total of 165 patients were randomly allocated to three groups and received LM or MH doses of landiolol hydrochloride or placebo. LM group: dose L (1-min loading dose at a rate of 0.03 mg/kg/min, followed by a 10-min infusion at 0.01 mg/kg/min) followed by dose M (1-min loading at a rate of 0.06 mg/kg/min, followed by a 10-min infusion at 0.02 mg/kg/min); MH group: dose M followed by dose H (1-min loading dose at a rate of 0.125 mg/kg/min, followed by a 10-min infusion at 0.04 mg/kg/min); placebo (PP) group: dose P (1-min loading dose at a rate of 0 mg/kg/min, followed by a 10-min infusion at 0 mg/kg/min) followed by another round of dose P. If the targeted heart-rate reduction was not obtained at the end of the first 10-min infusion, the higher dose was started. The primary endpoint was the percentage of patients who met the heart-rate reduction criteria (≥20 % reduction and <100 beats/min). The safety endpoint was the incidence of adverse events in each of the three groups.

Results

The percentages of patients who met the heart-rate reduction criteria (≥20 % reduction and <100 beats/min) were 0.0, 60.4, and 42.0 % in the PP, LM, and MH groups, respectively. There were significant differences in the LM and MH groups relative to the PP group, but there was no significant difference between the LM and MH groups. No significant difference was observed in the incidence of adverse events among the three groups: 29.6 % in the PP group, 45.5 % in the LM group, and 43.1 % in the MH group.

Conclusion

Landiolol hydrochloride is effective and safe for patients with postoperative SVT.

The pharmacokinetics of esmolol in pediatric subjects with supraventricular arrhythmias

Esmolol is often used in the acute management of children with arrhythmias and/or hypertension; however, pharmacokinetic studies of the drug in children have been limited. The objective of this study was to determine the pharmacokinetics of esmolol in children with a history of supraventricular arrhythmias (SVT) who were scheduled for diagnostic electrophysiology study or a catheter ablation procedure. Subjects were stratified into two age groups: 2-11 and 12-16 years. After an episode of stimulated or spontaneous SVT, esmolol was administered intravenously as a 1,000 microg/kg bolus followed by continuous infusion at 300 microg/kg/min. Blood samples were collected before, at 5, 10 and 15 min after the loading dose, and 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 20 min after the end of the infusion. Plasma concentration of esmolol was quantitated by a specific LC/MS assay. Pharmacokinetic data were available for 25 subjects. Arterial esmolol concentrations were approximately five times greater than venous concentrations. Esmolol had an extremely short distribution half-life (0.6 min), a rapid terminal elimination half-life (6.9 min), and a rapid clearance (119 +/- 51 mL/min/kg) which was not related to subject age or weight. Seventeen of the subjects (63%) converted to normal sinus rhythm in an average of 2 min (range 0-5 min). The pharmacokinetics of esmolol and its efficacy in terminating SVT in children is similar to that observed in adults.

Selection of drugs in pursuit of rate control strategy

Atrial fibrillation is the most common sustained arrhythmia. Based on multiple large randomized trials, rate control therapy has been shown to be safe and effective and is gaining greater acceptance as a frontline alternative to drugs to maintain sinus rhythm. Adequate rate control can be achieved by atrioventricular nodal blocking agents both in the acute and chronic settings. In refractory patients, other methods such as atrioventricular node ablation can be used to control rate.

Weathering the storm: beta-blockade and the potential for disaster in severe hyperthyroidism

Some patients with advanced thyrotoxicosis have occult cardiac dysfunction. The use of long-acting beta-blockers, traditional in the management of thyrotoxicosis, may have disastrous consequences in this setting. The following report documents the cardiovascular collapse and asystolic arrest of a patient with hyperthyroidism when treated with sotolol. Though the patient was successfully resuscitated, the long duration of action of sotolol necessitated prolonged inotropic and vasopressor support. A shorter acting beta-blocker, such as esmolol, theoretically may be a safer option.

Pilsicainide for conversion and maintenance of sinus rhythm in chronic atrial fibrillation: a placebo-controlled, multicenter study

BACKGROUND

Pilsicainide is a newly synthesized antiarrhythmic agent with class Ic properties. Various antiarrhythmic agents have been used to convert atrial fibrillation (AF) to sinus rhythm or decrease the rate of relapse of AF.

METHODS

We randomly assigned 62 patients with chronic AF to oral treatment of either a placebo (10 patients) or 150 mg/day of pilsicainide (52 patients) for 4 weeks before electrical cardioversion. Before oral administration of pilsicainide, 41 patients underwent transesophageal echocardiography to investigate whether there was thrombus formation in the heart chambers. Patients without pharmacologic defibrillation underwent direct current cardioversion to restore sinus rhythm. After successful cardioversion, all patients continued to receive pilsicainide and were monitored for up to 2 years.

RESULTS

Before cardioversion, 11 patients in the pilsicainide group (21%) reverted to sinus rhythm. No patients in the placebo group reverted to sinus rhythm. Direct current cardioversion was performed in 51 patients; however, 8 patients were not converted to sinus rhythm (5 patients receiving pilsicainide, 3 patients receiving placebo), and 3 patients needed intracardiac cardioversion to convert to sinus rhythm. Asymptomatic bradyarrhythmias were observed in 5 patients in the pilsicainide group. During the follow-up period, 33 patients (71%) in the pilsicainide group remained in sinus rhythm at 1 month; this number decreased to 23 patients (49%) at 3 months, 20 (43%) at 6 months, 16 (34%) at 12 months, 16 (34%) at 18 months, and 16 (34%) at 24 months. All patients receiving placebo continued to receive placebo after the cardioversion, and AF recurred a few days after cardioversion in all cases. No independent discriminant variables were identified in the groups between maintenance and nonmaintenance of sinus rhythm. Although no serious side effects regarding pilsicainide have been documented, one patient died of acute myocardial infarction, most likely not related to pilsicainide administration.

CONCLUSIONS

Pilsicainide is effective in restoring or maintaining sinus rhythm in patients with chronic AF lasting longer than an average duration of 22 months. No major adverse effects were observed.

Clinical, echocardiographic, and hormonal factors influencing spontaneous conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm

The present study was designed to determine clinical, hormonal, and echocardiographic factors influencing spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (symptoms <6 hours). The most important predictor of spontaneous conversion was the time of onset of atrial fibrillation; patients who developed the arrhythmia during sleep had the highest probability of spontaneous conversion during the first 24 hours. A second predictor was the plasma concentration of atrial natriuretic peptide during the arrhythmia.

Pharmacotherapy of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) remains a widespread health problem and the drugs available for its treatment suffer from several drawbacks, including potentially lethal proarrhythmia, serious non-cardiac toxicity and limited efficacy. The evidence for efficacy of currently available anti-arrhythmic agents for sinus rhythm restoration and maintenance is reviewed, with emphasis on randomised trials when available. The current approach to thromboembolism prophylaxis in AF is summarised.

The peri-operative management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is a common arrhythmia frequently seen in surgical patients. The onset of new atrial fibrillation during the peri-operative period is less common. There are many possible precipitating factors, although volatile agents themselves may have an antifibrillatory action. The management of atrial fibrillation includes removal of any precipitating factors and treatment of the arrhythmia itself. Immediate management of acute-onset atrial fibrillation is usually direct current cardioversion. Alternatively, anti-arrhythmic drugs can be used to achieve cardioversion. In patients with rapid, chronic atrial fibrillation or those refractory to cardioversion, priority is given to control of the ventricular rate. Thrombo-embolism is a significant risk if atrial fibrillation is paroxysmal or persists for more than 48 h.

Acute treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AFib) is a common clinical entity, responsible for significant morbidity and mortality, but it also accounts for a large percentage of healthcare dollar expenditures. Efforts to treat this arrhythmia in the past have focused on subacute antithrombotic therapy and eventually use of antiarrhythmic drugs for maintenance of sinus rhythm. However, there has been a growing interest in the concept of acute electrical and pharmacologic conversion. This treatment strategy has a number of benefits, including immediate alleviation of patient symptoms, avoidance of antithrombotic therapy, and prevention of electrophysiologic remodeling, which is thought to contribute to the perpetuation of the arrhythmia. There is also increasing evidence that this is a cost-effective strategy in that it may obviate admission to the hospital and the cost of long-term therapy. This article represents a summary of the treatments that may be used acutely to control the ventricular response to AFib, prevent thromboembolic events, and provide for acute conversion either pharmacologically or electrically. It includes information on modalities that are currently available and those that are under active development. We anticipate that an active, acute treatment approach to AFib and atrial flutter will become the therapeutic norm in the next few years, especially as the benefits of these interventions are demonstrated in clinical trials.

Likelihood of spontaneous conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm

OBJECTIVES

We sought to determine the likelihood and predictors of spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm of recent-onset atrial fibrillation (symptoms <72 h).

BACKGROUND

Although spontaneous conversion of recent-onset atrial fibrillation is common, the likelihood and clinical and echocardiographic predictors have not been fully defined. Such data would be important for management of patients in whom early cardioversion is desired: Cardioversion could be delayed in patients with a high likelihood of spontaneous conversion, and it could be expeditiously pursued if spontaneous conversion is unlikely.

METHODS

We screened 1,822 consecutive adults admitted to the hospital with atrial fibrillation and prospectively identified 356 patients (45% male, mean age +/- SD 68 +/- 16 years) with atrial fibrillation of <72-h duration. The occurrence of spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm and clinical and echocardiographic data were identified through retrospective chart review.

RESULTS

Spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 68% of the study group (n = 242; 95% confidence interval [CI] 63% to 73%). Among patients with spontaneous conversion, the total duration of atrial fibrillation was <24 h in 159 (66%), 24 to 48 h in 42 (17%) and >48 h in 41 (17%) (p < 0.001). Logistic regression analysis of clinical data identified presentation <24 h from onset of symptoms as the only predictor of spontaneous conversion (odds ratio 1.8, 95% CI 1.4 to 2.4, p < 0.0001). Normal left ventricular systolic function was more common among patients with spontaneous conversion (p = 0.03), but it was not an independent predictor of conversion. Left atrial dimension was similar between groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Spontaneous conversion to sinus rhythm occurs in almost 70% of patients presenting with atrial fibrillation of <72-h duration. Presentation with symptoms of <24-h duration is the best predictor of spontaneous conversion.

The medical management of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is an extremely common arrhythmia that is associated with significant sequelae. Certain aspects of therapy, such as anticoagulation, are studied in well-constructed randomized trials. Other therapy, such as the maintenance of sinus rhythm with antiarrhythmic agents, is supported by limited evidence. This article reviews the epidemiology and medical treatment of this arrhythmia, addressing anticoagulation, ventricular rate control, and restoration and maintenance of sinus rhythm. Randomized trials in progress that attempt to answer important questions in the management of atrial fibrillation are also discussed.

Antiarrhythmic drug therapy in the management of atrial fibrillation

Antiarrhythmic drugs have been used for the acute conversion of atrial fibrillation to sinus rhythm, as well as for the long-term maintenance of sinus rhythm. In recent years, concerns regarding antiarrhythmic drug efficacy as well as safety have prompted a re-examination of the indications for antiarrhythmic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation. This review will focus on the safety and efficacy of antiarrhythmic therapy in the acute and chronic management of patients with atrial fibrillation.

Pharmacologic management of atrial fibrillation

In an era when many electrophysiologic problems are routinely treated with invasive procedures or implantable devices, drugs remain the cornerstones of treatment for atrial fibrillation. Atrial fibrillation may present as an episodic rhythm in patients who are primarily in sinus rhythm or it may be manifested as rhythm disorder that is permanent. Patients who appear to have an episodic rhythm disorder may be found to be in atrial fibrillation permanently when followed for long periods of time, and prognosis in the two forms is similar. It is, therefore, useful to consider them different manifestations in the same spectrum of disease. This review will address pharmacologic approaches designed to: (1) slow ventricular response; (2) restore sinus rhythm; (3) reduce occurrences of atrial fibrillation; and (4) prevent thromboembolic complications. Nonpharmacologic approaches to treating atrial fibrillation will be briefly reviewed.

Effectiveness of verapamil-quinidine versus digoxin-quinidine in the emergency department treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine the relative effectiveness of a verapamil-quinidine sequential combination versus digoxin-quinidine in the emergency department treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF).

METHOD

This prospective, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial involved patients, aged 18 to 75 years, with new-onset (< 48 hours) atrial fibrillation who presented to a community-based urban hospital with an annual ED census of 65,000. Exclusion criteria included ventricular response rate lower than 100 or higher than 200 beats/minute, allergy to study drugs, hypotension with evidence of end-organ hypoperfusion, and conduction abnormalities. Consenting patients were randomly assigned to receive rapid digitalization (1.0 mg over 2 hours) or i.v. verapamil (sequential 5-mg boluses up to 20 mg). After ventricular rate was controlled (< 100 beats/minute), oral quinidine (200 mg) was initiated and repeated every 2 hours until conversion to normal sinus rhythm (NSR) occurred, until 1 g of quinidine was administered, or until adverse effects supervened. Heart rate, blood pressure, cardiac rhythm, time to conversion, and adverse effects were documented.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients received the study drugs. Three were withdrawn, leaving 19 in the verapamil-quinidine (VER-Q) group and 22 in the digoxin-quinidine (DIG-Q) group. Sixteen patients (84%) in the VER-Q group and 10 (45%) in the DIG-Q group converted to NSR within 6 hours (P < .02). Mean time to conversion (+/-SD) was 185 +/- 146 minutes for VER-Q and 368 +/- 386 minutes for DIG-Q patients (P = NS). Twelve VER-Q patients (63%) and 6 DIG-Q patients (27%) were discharged from the ED (P < .05). Minor adverse effects were more common in the VER-Q group. No mortality or significant morbidity occurred.

CONCLUSION

The sequential combination of verapamil and quinidine, in the doses studied, is an effective treatment for PAF and is superior to digoxin-quinidine. Digoxin should no longer be considered the treatment of choice for uncomplicated PAF.

Pharmacologic control of heart rate in atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation is associated with a resting heart rate in excess of age-matched subjects in sinus rhythm, and there is an additional steep rise in rate during exertion. This article reviews the factors responsible for this tachycardia, the pharmacologic agents commonly used for heart rate control, and the effects of atrial antiarrhythmic agents on the heart rate during paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

Safety and risk/benefit analysis of ibutilide for acute conversion of atrial fibrillation/flutter

Safety data were reviewed from several controlled clinical trials of ibutilide, a new class III antiarrhythmic drug recently approved for the acute interruption of atrial fibrillation and flutter. Noncardiovascular adverse effects of ibutilide were similar in frequency to those with placebo. Cardiovascular adverse effects occurred in 24.9% of 586 ibutilide-treated patients as compared with 22.2% of 108 sotalol-treated patients, and 7.1% of 127 patients who received placebo. Polymorphous ventricular tachycardia, diagnosed as torsades de pointes, was more common with ibutilide than with placebo or sotalol treatment. It occurred in 4.3% of patients, including 1.7% whose torsades de pointes was sustained and required cardioversion. In the ibutilide group, 4.9% of patients had nonsustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia compared with 3.7% of patients who received sotalol and 0.8% of patients who received placebo. All of the sustained arrhythmias except 1 occurred within 1 hour of the end of ibutilide infusion, and all were successfully terminated without sequelae. In a multiple logistic regression analysis, bradycardia, low body weight, and history of congestive heart failure were predictive of the occurrence of torsades de pointes. Hypotension, conduction block, bradycardia, and all other cardiovascular adverse effects all occurred at similar rates in the ibutilide- and placebo-treated groups. For patients who failed to convert while receiving ibutilide, there was no decrease in the efficiency of cardioversion, nor was there an increase in the mean energy requirements for subsequent electrical cardioversion. Analysis of a 3-month follow-up study showed that patients receiving ibutilide had similar outcomes compared with patients receiving placebo. One placebo-treated patient died. Other than torsades de pointes, ibutilide has a very good safety profile. Under the proper clinical conditions, this complication of ibutilide therapy can be rapidly diagnosed and effectively treated.

Intravenous sotalol for the termination of supraventricular tachycardia and atrial fibrillation and flutter: a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Sotalol Multicenter Study Group

Sotalol is an antiarrhythmic agent with combined beta-blocking and class III antiarrhythmic properties. This study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of sotalol in terminating supraventricular tachycardia (SVT), atrial fibrillation (AFib), and atrial flutter (AFl). Ninety-three patients with spontaneous or induced SVT (n = 45) or AF (AFib or AFl; n = 48) with a ventricular rate of > or = 120 beats/min were studied. In the first phase, the double-blind phase, patients were randomly assigned to receive placebo or intravenous (i.v.) sotalol, 1.0 or 1.5 mg/kg. If SVT or AF did not convert to sinus rhythm or if the ventricular rate did not slow to < 100 beats/min within 30 minutes, patients then entered the second phase, the open-label phase, which also lasted 30 minutes, and were given 1.5 mg/kg iv sotalol. In the SVT group, during the double-blind phase conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 2 (14%) of 14 of patients who received placebo, 10 (67%) of 15 who received sotalol, 1.0 mg/kg (p < 0.05 vs placebo), and 10 (67%) of 15 who received 1.5 mg/kg sotalol (p < 0.05 vs placebo); during the open-label phase, 1.5 mg/kg i.v. sotalol converted 7 (41%) of 17 of patients. In the AF group, during the double-blind phase conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 2 (14%) of 14 of patients who received placebo, 2 (11%) of 18 who received 1.0 mg/kg sotalol (p not significant [NS] vs placebo), and 2 (13%) of 16 who received 1.5 mg/kg sotalol (p = NS vs placebo); in these groups, a > 20% reduction of ventricular rate without conversion to sinus rhythm occurred in 0 (0%) of 14, 13 (72%) of 18 (p < 0.05 vs placebo), and 12 (75%) of 16 of patients (p < 0.05 vs placebo), respectively; during the open-label phase, 1.5 mg/kg i.v. sotalol converted 7 (30%) of 23 of patients. The most common adverse events were hypotension and dyspnea. During the double-blind phase they occurred in 10% of patients who received placebo, 9% of those who received 1.0 mg/kg i.v. sotalol (p = NS vs placebo), and 10% of those who received 1.5 mg/kg i.v. sotalol (p = NS vs placebo). Most of these events were mild to moderate, but all were transient and clinically manageable.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Esmolol. A review of its therapeutic efficacy and pharmacokinetic characteristics

Esmolol is an ultra short-acting intravenous cardioselective beta-antagonist. It has an extremely short elimination half-life (mean: 9 minutes; range: 4 to 16 minutes) and a total body clearance [285 ml/min/kg (17.1 L/h/kg)] approaching 3 times cardiac output and 14 times hepatic blood flow. The alpha-distribution half-life is approximately 2 minutes. When esmolol is administered as a bolus followed by a continuous infusion, onset of activity occurs within 2 minutes, with 90% of steady-state beta-blockade occurring within 5 minutes. Full recovery from beta-blockade is observed 18 to 30 minutes after terminating the infusion. Esmolol blood concentrations are undetectable 20 to 30 minutes postinfusion. The elimination of esmolol is independent of renal or hepatic function as it is metabolised by red blood cell cytosol esterases to an acid metabolite and methanol. The acid metabolite, which is renally eliminated, has 1500-fold less activity than esmolol. Methanol concentrations remain within the range of normal endogenous levels. Clinically, esmolol is used for the following: (i) situations where a brief duration of adrenergic blockade is required, such as tracheal intubation and stressful surgical stimuli; and (ii) critically ill or unstable patients in whom the dosage of esmolol is easily titrated to response and adverse effects are rapidly managed by termination of the infusion. In adults, bolus doses of 100 to 200mg are effective in attenuating the adrenergic responses associated with tracheal intubation and surgical stimuli. For the control of supraventricular arrhythmias, acute postoperative hypertension and acute ischaemic heart disease, doses of < 300 micrograms/kg/min, administered by continuous intravenous infusion, are used. The principal adverse effect of esmolol is hypotension (incidence of 0 to 50%), which is frequently accompanied with diaphoresis. The incidence of hypotension appears to increase with doses exceeding 150 micrograms/kg/min and in patients with low baseline blood pressure. Hypotension infrequently requires any intervention other than decreasing the dose or discontinuing the infusion. Symptoms generally resolve within 30 minutes after discontinuing the drug. In surgical and critical care settings where clinical conditions are rapidly changing, the pharmacokinetic profile of esmolol allows the drug to provide rapid pharmacological control and minimises the potential for serious adverse effects.

Comparative effects of esmolol and labetalol to attenuate hyperdynamic states after electroconvulsive therapy

We studied 18 patients (age range, 53-90 yr) with at least one cardiovascular risk factor who were treated with electroconvulsive therapy (ECT) and compared effects of five pretreatments: no drug; esmolol, 1.3 or 4.4 mg/kg; or labetalol, 0.13 or 0.44 mg/kg. Each patient received all five treatments, during a series of five ECT sessions. Pretreatment was administered as a bolus within 10 s of induction or anesthesia. Doses of methohexital and succinylcholine were constant for the series of treatments and the assignment to no drug or to drug and dose was determined by randomized block design. Measurements of systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP) and heart rate (HR) were recorded during the awake state and 1, 3, 5, and 10 min after the seizure. The deviation of ST segments from baseline was measured by an electrocardiogram (ECG) monitor equipped with ST-segment analysis software. The results (mean +/- SEM) show that without pretreatment, there were significant (P < 0.05) peak increases in SBP and HR (55 +/- 5 mm Hg and 37 +/- 6 bpm, respectively), recorded 1 min after the seizure. Comparable reductions (by approximately 50%) in these peak values were achieved after esmolol (1.3 mg/kg) or labetalol (0.13 mg/kg), and cardiovascular responses were nearly eliminated after the same drugs in doses of 4.4 and 0.44 mg/kg, respectively. The deviation of ST-segment values from baseline in any lead was not measurably influenced by either antihypertensive drug. SBP values were lower after labetalol 10 min after the seizure, but not after esmolol. Asystolic time after the seizure was not significantly longer with either drug.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Coronary artery operation supported by the Hemopump: an experimental study on pig

Twelve pigs undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting had the Hemopump to decompress the heart and as circulatory support. The pigs also were given a short-acting beta-blocker, esmolol, to make the heart flaccid. Extracorporeal circulation was not used. During Hemopump support, a bolus dose of 0.5 to 5 mg/kg of esmolol was given before incremental titration steps from 100 to 600 micrograms.kg-1.min-1 over 15 to 20 minutes. The internal thoracic artery was sutured to the distal part of the left anterior descending artery. The Hemopump was withdrawn to the aorta after a weaning period of 20 to 30 minutes. Seven of 12 pigs went through the whole procedure and the Hemopump was weaned off without complications. Five animals died due to right ventricular failure in association with esmolol administration. There was a big interindividual difference in esmolol dose-response curves in the surviving animals. No significant differences in the hemodynamic variables were observed during the experiment. The Hemopump in combination with a short-acting beta-blocker could be an alternate way of performing coronary artery bypass grafting in selected patients.

Indications and limitations of class II and III antiarrhythmic drugs in atrial fibrillation

In summary, the Class III antiarrhythmic agents amiodarone and sotalol are effective in restoring sinus rhythm in patients with chronic atrial fibrillation with a higher effectiveness of amiodarone. Both agents successfully prevent recurrent episodes of atrial fibrillation after electrical cardioversion and both can control heart rate in persistent atrial fibrillation. Amiodarone appears to be particularly suitable in patients with atrial fibrillation and concomitant congestive heart failure because it lacks clinically relevant negative inotropic activity. Both substances are also effective in controlling ventricular arrhythmias that are frequently present in patients with atrial fibrillation. Finally, both drugs possess antiadrenergic activity, which makes the substances particularly attractive in patients with coronary heart disease as the underlying cause of atrial fibrillation.

Effectiveness and costs of digoxin treatment for atrial fibrillation and flutter

Clinical outcomes and costs associated with the use of digoxin in atrial fibrillation and flutter were evaluated in a prospective, observational study at 18 academic medical centers in the United States. Data were collected on 115 patients (aged > 18 years) with atrial fibrillation or flutter who were treated with digoxin for rapid ventricular rate (> or = 120 beats/min). The median time to ventricular rate control (i.e., resting ventricular rate < 100 beats/min, decrease in ventricular rate of > 20%, or sinus rhythm) was 11.6 hours from the first dose of digoxin for all evaluable patients (n = 105) and 9.5 hours for those only receiving digoxin (n = 64). Before ventricular rate control, the mean +/- SD dose of digoxin administered was 0.80 +/- 0.74 mg, and a mean of 1.4 +/- 1.8 serum digoxin concentrations were ordered per patient. Concomitant beta-blocker or calcium antagonist therapy was instituted in 47 patients (41%); in 19 of these, combination therapy was initiated within 2 hours. Adenosine was administered to 13 patients (11%). Patients spent a median of 4 days (range 1 to 25) in the hospital; 28% spent time in a coronary/intensive care unit and 79% in a telemetry bed. Loss of control (i.e., resting ventricular rate returned to > 120 beats/min) occurred at least once in 50% of patients and was associated with a longer hospital stay (p < 0.05). Based on 1991 data, the estimated mean hospital bed cost for patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter was $3,169 +/- $3,174.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Atrial fibrillation: new management strategies

The main goal of therapy in atrial fibrillation is to restore sinus rhythm, if this is possible, to avoid adverse hemodynamic, electrical, and embolic consequences. The restoration of sinus rhythm is urgent if the patient is unstable. In a stable patient, if the duration is shorter than 48 hours and an atrial thrombus is unlikely, then sinus rhythm can be restored after initial rate control. If the duration of atrial fibrillation is more than 48 hours, the embolic risk may be significant, and anticoagulation will be required for 2 to 4 weeks before an attempt at cardioversion. In patients in whom sinus rhythm cannot be restored or maintained, the goal of therapy is rate control and reduction of embolic risk unless the risk of anticoagulation outweighs its benefit. In difficult cases, rate control may be accomplished with AV nodal ablation and pacemaker implantation or with one of the surgical procedures described above with varying degrees of normalization of the physiology. Although not included in this flow chart, we do not advocate episodic intermittent therapy for patients with infrequent episodes of atrial fibrillation because this could be potentially dangerous and may place the patient at a higher risk for developing proarrhythmia.

Redefining the role of digoxin in the treatment of atrial fibrillation

Atrial fibrillation (AF) encompasses a variety of discrete clinical syndromes, including paroxysmal, chronic, acute, and postoperative. Digoxin, long considered the mainstay of therapy for rate control in all types of AF, appears to have only modest electrophysiologic effects, which are mediated primarily by the autonomic nervous system. Digoxin has less potency than the calcium antagonists or beta-blocking drugs with respect to atrioventricular nodal blockade. Although less potent than calcium antagonists or beta-blocking drugs on the atrioventricular node, digoxin provides positive inotropic support, whereas the other 2 agents can suppress left ventricular function. Thus, digoxin is the agent of choice in patients with AF in the setting of significant left ventricular dysfunction. However, in the absence of left ventricular dysfunction, digoxin should be considered second-line therapy for the treatment of all AF syndromes.

Esmolol in the Treatment of Multifocal Atrial Tachycardia

Multifocal atrial tachycardia (MAT) is a supraventricular tachydysrhythmia precipitated by a number of pharmacologic and physiologic disturbances. Corrections of these disturbances should take precedence in the treatment of MAT.

Cardiovascular and antiarrhythmic effects of esmolol in children

This prospective study evaluated the cardiovascular and antiarrhythmic effects of esmolol, an intravenous beta-blocker with an extremely short half-life. Twenty patients (aged 2 to 16 years) underwent diagnostic electrophysiologic studies at rest and during beta-blockade induced with esmolol. An initial dose of 600 micrograms/kg was infused for 2 minutes and followed by an infusion of 200 micrograms/kg per minute. The dosage was increased by 50 to 100 micrograms/kg per minute every 5 to 10 minutes until a reduction of greater than 10% in either heart rate or mean blood pressure was seen. The dosage required to achieve beta-blockade ranged from 300 to 1000 micrograms/kg per minute (mean 550 micrograms/kg per minute). Electrophysiologic effects included a decrease in the rate of sinoatrial node discharge and delay in conduction through the atrioventricular node. There was no effect on His-Purkinje conduction. Atrial and ventricular effective refractory periods were unchanged. In six patients with supraventricular tachycardia, esmolol prevented induction of tachycardia in four and slowed the rate of the tachycardia in two. In four patients with ventricular tachycardia, clinical findings were improved in three and unchanged in one. Heart rate and blood pressure returned to near baseline values 10 minutes after the esmolol infusion was stopped. Adverse ventricular electrophysiologic effects were observed in two patients with biopsy evidence of myocarditis. No other adverse effects were seen. We conclude that the effects of esmolol in children are similar to those of other beta-blockers and that it is useful in the evaluation and management of pediatric tachyarrhythmias. The weight-adjusted dosage required to induce beta-blockade in children is larger than the adult dosage, and the effects of esmolol dissipate rapidly.

The pharmacologic treatment of atrial fibrillation

The pharmacologic treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) is aimed at controlling the ventricular response, restoring sinus rhythm, and preventing or delaying relapses. In the control of ventricular response, digitalis maintains a primary role when the arrhythmia is accompanied by heart failure. In ischemic, hypertensive, and degenerative (whose number is increasing at present) cardiopathies without evident ventricular dilatation, treatments with calcium antagonists (such as verapamil, gallopamil, or diltiazem) or beta-blocking agents must be preferred. In order to control the ventricular response in patients with chronic AF during physical activity, the association of digitalis with beta-blocking agents or calcium antagonists seems to provide satisfactory results. The drugs of the IC class, especially flecainide, represent a certain therapeutical progress in the restoration of sinus rhythm in the treatment of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation affecting subjects without evident alterations of ventricular function, particularly in subjects with Wolff-Parkinson-White syndrome, with forms of vagal origin, or with atrial fibrillation alone. A therapeutic combination of digitalis and quinidine may produce resolution of the arrhythmia in the presence of altered ventricular function or when AF is of an uncertain onset. In patients with hypertensive, ischemic, and/or degenerative cardiopathy without evident ventricular or advanced heart failure, the verapamil-quinidine association may also be effective and even quicker. The combination of drugs of the I and III class for restoration of the sinus rhythm in particularly resistant forms of AF without evident structural heart alterations is promising but must be verified in a greater number of patients. In the prevention of relapses amiodarone appears to have the widest spectrum of advantages from an electrophysiologic point of view; however, because of its many side effects, amiodarone represents a late therapeutical choice. The promising results obtained with flecainide are disputed by the results of the CAST, which limit the possibilities of using this drug to a low number of cases (W.P.W. syndrome, AF of vagal origin, atrial fibrillation alone). In the past, quinidine and disopyramide have been the drugs most widely used in the prophylaxis of AF. These drugs have a similar efficacy, and both of them provided some positive results. However, because of untoward side effects (especially for quinidine) during chronic treatment, the use of these drugs has been questioned. Perhaps in the majority of patients, the less dangerous therapeutic choice after the termination of the fibrillation is a combination of drugs slowly down AV node activity (digitalis or calcium antagonists and beta blockers) with class IA antiarrhythmics.

Rapid-acting parenteral antihypertensive agents

Parenteral antihypertensive agents are useful in those clinical situations where rapid reduction of blood pressure is necessary or where treatment with oral antihypertensive medications is not feasible. Given the diverse selection of parenteral antihypertensive drugs now available, therapy can be individualized. The presence of concurrent diseases will often influence the decision-making process regarding choice of an agent. Complications of parenteral antihypertensive therapy can arise from the intrinsic properties of the various drugs or the development of severe hypotension. Gradual lowering of blood pressure, in conjunction with careful clinical evaluation, will minimize the risks of acute parenteral antihypertensive therapy. Given that parenteral antihypertensive therapy often needs to be replaced by oral therapy, those drugs that can be used both parenterally and orally may have an advantage.

A bolus dose of esmolol attenuates tachycardia and hypertension after tracheal intubation

Forty-five patients of ASA physical status I and II undergoing a variety of non-cardiac surgical procedures were studied to determine the effect of bolus administration of esmolol, a new short-acting beta blocking drug, on heart rate and blood pressure responses to induction of anaesthesia and tracheal intubation. Subjects were allocated randomly to receive placebo, 100 mg or 200 mg of esmolol IV as part of an anaesthetic induction technique. The differences in heart rate between the placebo group and both the 100 mg and 200 mg groups were significant prior to intubation (95 +/- 7.9, 82 +/- 9.7, 80 +/- 7.3 beats per min respectively), and also at 0.5 min and 1.5 min following intubation for the 200 mg group. In the 200 mg group there was a significant decrease, compared with placebo, in systolic blood pressure at 0.5 min (144 +/- 32.1 vs 165 +/- 18.7 mmHg) and 1.5 min (154 +/- 25.0 vs 170 +/- 19.5 mmHg) after intubation. In this study, adequate haemodynamic control was obtained following administration of 200 mg of esmolol.

Efficacy and safety of intravenous diltiazem for treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. The Diltiazem-Atrial Fibrillation/Flutter Study Group

This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of intravenous diltiazem for the treatment of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter. A double-blind, parallel, randomized, placebo-controlled protocol was used, and 6 large, urban hospitals, both university-affiliated and private, participated. The study involved 113 patients with atrial fibrillation or flutter, a ventricular rate greater than or equal to 120 beats/min and systolic blood pressure greater than or equal to 90 mm Hg without severe heart failure. The dose of intravenous diltiazem (or identical placebo) was 0.25 mg/kg/2 minutes followed 15 minutes later by 0.35 mg/kg/2 minutes if the first dose was tolerated but ineffective. If a patient did not respond, the code was broken and the patient was allowed to receive open-label diltiazem if placebo had been given. Of 56 patients, 42 (75%) randomized to receive diltiazem responded to 0.25 mg/kg and 10 of 14 responded to 0.35 mg/kg, for a total response rate of 52 of 56 patients (93%), whereas 7 of 57 patients (12%) responded to placebo (p less than 0.001). After the double-blind protocol, 49 of the 57 patients who received placebo were then given diltiazem; 47 of 49 responded, for an overall response rate of 99 of 105 patients (94%) with diltiazem. The median time from the start of drug infusion to the maximal decrease in heart rate was 4.3 minutes. Side effects occurred in 14 patients, 7 of whom had asymptomatic hypotension not requiring intervention. Thus, intravenous diltiazem was rapidly effective for slowing the ventricular response in most patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter. Blood pressure decreased slightly. Side effects were mild.

Esmolol versus verapamil in the acute treatment of atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter

The effects of esmolol, an ultrashort-acting beta blocker, and verapamil were compared in controlling ventricular response in 45 patients with atrial fibrillation or atrial flutter, in a randomized, parallel, open-label study. Patients with either new onset (less than 48 hours, n = 31) or old onset (greater than 48 hours, n = 14) of atrial fibrillation or flutter with rapid ventricular rate were stratified to receive esmolol (n = 21) or verapamil (n = 24). Drug efficacy was measured by ventricular rate reduction and conversion to sinus rhythm. The heart rate declined with esmolol from 139 to 100 beats/min (p less than 0.001) and with verapamil from 142 to 97 beats/min (p less than 0.001). Fifty percent of esmolol-treated patients with new onset of arrhythmias converted to sinus rhythm, whereas only 12% of those who received verapamil converted (p less than 0.03). Mild hypotension was observed in both treatment groups. Esmolol compares favorably with verapamil with respect to both efficacy and safety in acutely decreasing ventricular response during atrial fibrillation or flutter. Moreover, conversion to sinus rhythm is significantly more likely with esmolol.

Use of an ultrashort-acting beta-receptor blocker (esmolol) in patients with acute myocardial ischemia and relative contraindications to beta-blockade therapy

The hemodynamic responses to esmolol, an ultrashort-acting (t1/2 = 9 min) beta 1-adrenergic receptor antagonist, were examined in 16 patients with myocardial ischemia and compromised left ventricular function as evidenced by a mean pulmonary capillary wedge pressure of 15 to 25 mm Hg. Esmolol was infused intravenously to a maximal dose of 300 micrograms/kg body weight per min for less than or equal to 48 h in 16 patients: 9 with acute myocardial infarction, 6 with periinfarction angina and 1 with acute unstable angina. The sinus rate and systolic arterial pressure declined rapidly in all patients from baseline values of 99 +/- 12 beats/min and 126 +/- 19 mm Hg to 80 +/- 14 beats/min (p less than 0.05) and 107 +/- 20 mm Hg (p less than or equal to 0.05) during esmolol treatment. Rate-pressure product decreased by 33% and cardiac index by 14% during esmolol treatment, but pulmonary capillary wedge pressure was not significantly altered by drug infusion (19 +/- 3 mm Hg at baseline versus 19 +/- 5 during treatment, p = NS). In all patients there was a rapid return toward baseline hemodynamic measurements within 15 min of stopping administration of esmolol, and virtually complete resolution of drug effect was evident within approximately 30 min. During infusion of esmolol, four of nine patients receiving intravenous nitroglycerin required downward adjustment of nitroglycerin infusion rate to maintain systolic blood pressure greater than 90 mm Hg.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Efficacy of esmolol in the treatment and transfer of patients with supraventricular tachyarrhythmias to alternate oral antiarrhythmic agents

The efficacy and safety of esmolol, a titratable intravenous beta-adrenergic blocking agent with a short elimination half-life (t 1/2 = 9.0 min) was evaluated in a multicenter open-label study for the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias (heart rate greater than 100 bpm). The study also investigated the feasibility of transferring patients from esmolol to alternate oral antiarrhythmic agents without loss of therapeutic response. Of the 113 patients studied, 95 (84%) achieved therapeutic response (reduction in heart rate of 15% or more or conversion to sinus rhythm). Most of these patients (93%) achieved the therapeutic response at esmolol doses of 200 micrograms/kg/min or lower. Transfer from esmolol to an oral antiarrhythmic agent(s) was studied in 76 patients. Alternate antiarrhythmic agents used in this study were digoxin (N = 25), propranolol (N = 21), verapamil (N = 10), metoprolol (N = 11), quinidine (N = 2), and a combination of two antiarrhythmic agents (N = 7). Sixty-seven (88%) patients were successfully transferred to oral antiarrhythmic agents without loss of the therapeutic response obtained with esmolol. The most frequent adverse effect observed during the study was hypotension, which resolved quickly (16 +/- 14 min) either by decreasing the dose or by discontinuation of esmolol infusion. This study supports previous observations concerning the safety and efficacy of esmolol in the treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias. Furthermore, it demonstrates that the majority of patients successfully treated with esmolol can be safely and effectively transferred to oral therapy with alternate antiarrhythmic agents.

Controlled beta-receptor blockade with esmolol and flestolol

Beta-receptor-blocking agents are commonly used in the management of various cardiovascular diseases. Recently, esmolol, a pharmacokinetically novel cardioselective beta-receptor-blocking agent, has been introduced for use in the treatment of critically ill patients. It is devoid of intrinsic sympathomimetic activity and in doses used clinically, it has no direct depressant effect on the heart. Esmolol is an ester and is metabolized by choline-esterase to ASL 8123, an inactive molecule. Esmolol has an elimination half-life of nine minutes which accounts for its ultrashort duration of action. This unique pharmacokinetic property provides two advantages over other longer-acting beta-receptor-blocking agents. First, the magnitude of beta-receptor blockade can be titrated to a desired level. Second, if adverse effects are experienced, reducing the dosage or terminating the infusion results in rapid reversal of its pharmacological effects. Another ultrashort-acting, non-cardioselective beta-receptor blocking agent, flestolol is undergoing clinical evaluation. Esmolol has been approved for the management of supraventricular tachycardia. The clinical safety of these novel drugs will expand the use of beta-receptor-blocking agents in the management of cardiovascular diseases in critically ill patients.

Ultra-short-acting beta-adrenergic blockers

The ultra-short-acting beta-adrenergic blockers are parenteral agents that can be rapidly titrated in clinical situations where immediate beta-adrenergic blockade is warranted. The effects of those drugs rapidly dissipate after termination of treatment, providing an important safety feature. Esmolol, the prototype drug of this class, is approved for treatment of supraventricular tachyarrhythmias but also has potential use in treatment of patients with perioperative hypertension and acute myocardial ischemia.