Prevention of venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

A Model Incorporating Some of the Mechanical and Biochemical Factors Underlying Clot Formation and Dissolution in Flowing Blood

Multiple interacting mechanisms control the formation and dissolution of clots to maintain blood in a state of delicate balance. In addition to a myriad of biochemical reactions, rheological factors also play a crucial role in modulating the response of blood to external stimuli. To date, a comprehensive model for clot formation and dissolution, that takes into account the biochemical, medical and rheological factors, has not been put into place, the existing models emphasizing either one or the other of the factors. In this paper, after discussing the various biochemical, physiologic and rheological factors at some length, we develop a model for clot formation and dissolution that incorporates many of the relevant crucial factors that have a bearing on the problem. The model, though just a first step towards understanding a complex phenomenon, goes further than previous models in integrating the biochemical, physiologic and rheological factors that come into play.

Brevet tx: anti-embolism stockings for prevention and treatment of DVT

This article highlights the incidence and aetiology of thrombi, in particular deep vein thrombosis (DVT) before discussing the clinical features, diagnostic techniques and management of patients with suspected or confirmed DVT. The prophylactic use of anti-embolism stockings is then reviewed, including relevant clinical evidence, with particular reference to one of the leading brands of stocking currently available, that of Brevert tx (Seton Scholl Healthcare). The action, features, benefits and application of this type of anti-embolic stocking are detailed.

Reduction of thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications after stent implantation

This study compared two consecutive antithrombotic strategies after Palmaz-Schatz stent implantation and involved 918 patients. Patients treated between May 1991 and May 1994 (group 1; n = 379) received aspirin, dipyridamole, and intravenous unfractionated heparin until oral anticoagulation was effective, between June 1994 and August 1995, 539 patients (group 2) were treated for 1 month with subcutaneous low-molecular-weight heparin (Fragmin), ticlopidine, and aspirin. There were no differences between the groups in terms of sex, clinical condition, vessel diameter, and severity and location of stenosis. Patients in group 1 were younger than those in group 2 (4% were > 70 years old compared with 12%, respectively; p < 0.01). Group 1 patients had more frequent unplanned stenting (48% vs 18%, respectively; p < 0.01) and fewer endoprostheses in the same artery than those in group 2 (1.1 +/- 0.5 vs 1.2 +/- 0.5, respectively; p < 0.01). Among group 2 patients, there was a significant reduction in thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications compared with group 1 patients. No subacute thrombosis occurred in patients in group 2 in contrast with a 5.8% incidence in patients in group 1 (p < 0.01). In addition, a lower incidence of groin and systemic bleeding was observed in patients in group 2 compared with patients in group 1 (2.6% vs 15%, respectively; p < 0.01). The association of low-molecular-weight heparin and antiplatelets provides a simpler antithrombotic strategy in patients treated with intracoronary stents and reduces the incidence of stent thrombosis and hemorrhagic complications. Our findings suggest that this antithrombotic regimen may prevent or completely avoid stent thrombosis.

Effect of 'antiembolism' compression hosiery on leg blood volume

Blood volume in the legs of healthy volunteers and the ability of graduated compression hosiery to reduce that volume were investigated with gamma scintigraphy. Changing posture from supine to upright, or pneumatic thigh cuffs inflated to either 20 or 40 mmHg with the subject supine, significantly increased leg blood volumes; the mean increase was: upright 126 ml, 20 mmHg cuff 44 ml, and 40 mmHg cuff 113 ml. A significant trend in reducing these volumes was noted in three brands of commercially available stockings, with the subject supine and without thigh cuffs (Page's L trend 132.5, P < 0.01) and when cuffs were applied at 20 mmHg (Page's L trend 128, P = 0.05). Few of the commercially available stockings delivered the 'standard' compression profile of 18 mmHg at the ankle, 14 mmHg at the calf and 8 mmHg at the upper thigh. The effects of other compression profiles were assessed, using custom-made stockings, and pneumatic cuffs inflated to 20 mmHg applied to the upper thighs to impede venous return. There was no consistent reduction of blood volume in the popliteal region, although decreases were seen in the upper and lower calf. The major determinant of performance was compression at the calf; the ankle to calf compression gradient was not important. Stockings with a profile of 16.8 mmHg at the ankle, 14.5 mmHg at the calf and 6.4 mmHg at the upper thigh performed best.

Light reflection rheography as a noninvasive screening test for deep venous thrombosis

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To determine if light reflection rheography is a useful screening tool for the diagnosis of proximal leg deep venous thrombosis.

DESIGN

Light reflection rheography was compared with duplex ultrasonography and/or contrast venography on emergency patients being evaluated for proximal leg deep venous thrombosis.

SETTING

University hospital emergency department.

TYPE OF PARTICIPANTS

Seventy-five ED patients being evaluated for acute leg deep venous thrombosis.

INTERVENTIONS

Seventy-five patients being evaluated for clinically suspected deep venous thrombosis had light reflection rheography performed on the involved extremity immediately before duplex ultrasonography and/or contrast venography. Duplex ultrasonography and/or contrast venography was the definitive diagnostic test.

MEASUREMENTS AND RESULTS

Seventy-five patients had light reflection rheography performed, 72 had duplex ultrasonography, 19 had contrast venography, three had contrast venography alone, and 16 had both duplex ultrasonography and contrast venography. A comparison of light reflection rheography with duplex ultrasonography and/or contrast venography reveals that 39 light reflection rheography examinations were true-negative, 17 were true-positive, one was false-negative, and 18 were false-positive. The sensitivity of light reflection rheography for the detection of proximal leg deep venous thrombosis is 94.4% (95% confidence interval [CI], 72.7-99.9%), the negative-predictive value is 97.5% (95% CI, 86.8-99.9%), the specificity is 68.4% (95% CI, 54.8-80.1%), and the positive-predictive value is 48.6% (95% CI, 31.4-66%).

CONCLUSION

Light reflection rheography proved to be an excellent screening tool for emergency patients with the clinical suspicion for an acute proximal leg deep venous thrombosis. A normal light reflection rheography examination was 97.5% accurate as a negative predictor. That is, a normal light reflection rheography excluded the diagnosis of proximal leg deep venous thrombosis when compared with duplex ultrasonography and/or contrast venography when the duplex ultrasonography and/or contrast venography showed no evidence of proximal leg deep venous thrombosis. An abnormal light reflection rheography does not equate to an acute leg deep venous thrombosis as the specificity was only 68.4%. An abnormal light reflection rheography mandates further diagnostic studies such as duplex ultrasonography and/or contrast venography to confirm a diagnosis of proximal leg deep venous thrombosis.

Deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary embolism

All surgical patients are at risk for the development of deep venous thrombosis and subsequent pulmonary embolism or postphlebitic syndrome. The evolution of ultrasonographic imaging has increased the awareness of prevention, diagnosis, and treatment of deep venous thrombosis. Duplex imaging and Doppler color flow imaging have made the diagnosis of deep venous thrombosis relatively simple, painless, inexpensive, and definitive. These procedures have gained acceptance by both patients and physicians. Several risk factors have been identified that increase the chance of the development of deep venous thrombosis. These factors include a history of deep venous thrombosis, presence of a malignant process, increasing age, cigarette smoking, obesity, prolonged bed rest, and general anesthesia. The greater the number of risk factors, the more aggressive prophylaxis should be. Means of prophylaxis have improved, and surgeons now generally agree that some form of prophylaxis is required. Heparin and intermittent compression devices appear to be equally effective in preventing deep venous thrombosis. The addition of venous monitoring in high-risk patients permits immediate identification of the presence of deep venous thrombosis. During the last decade, the treatment of patients with deep venous thrombosis has changed little. Heparin followed by warfarin remains the treatment of choice. A small group of patients receive fibrinolytic therapy for deep venous thrombosis. Although the incidence of postoperative deep venous thrombosis has decreased during the last decade, it remains a significant complication.

Deep venous thrombosis in the surgical intensive care unit

The ICU patient population is at a high risk for the development of deep venous thrombosis leading to a potentially fatal pulmonary embolism. It is vital to appreciate this risk and apply appropriate prophylaxis. Constant vigilance is required, as deep venous thrombosis and pulmonary emboli can develop and progress despite standard prophylactic measures. In unstable patients, more aggressive prophylaxis may be warranted, including the use of inferior vena cava filters. A high index of suspicion and a low threshold for screening and diagnostic testing will allow earlier recognition and treatment of this lifethreatening condition. Treatment decisions are based on clinical suspicion, diagnostic examination results, and the potential complications of difficult treatment modalities.

Multiple pulmonary microemboli complicating pneumonectomy

Pulmonary embolism is widely recognized to complicate abdominal and lower limb orthopedic surgical procedures, but in comparison, it is seldom recognized to hamper the postoperative progress of patients after thoracic operations. We present 4 patients in whom multiple pulmonary emboli developed after pneumonectomy, 2 of whom were treated successfully. We discuss the mostly atypical presentation and the physiological and clinical consequences, and also suggest a mode of management.