Capabilities of supine exercise electrocardiography versus exercise radionuclide angiography in predicting coronary events

Value of stress myocardial perfusion single photon emission computed tomography in patients with normal resting electrocardiograms: an evaluation of incremental prognostic value and cost-effectiveness

BACKGROUND

The incremental value and cost-effectiveness of stress single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT) is of unclear added value over clinical and exercise treadmill testing data in patients with normal resting ECGs, a patient subset known to be at relatively lower risk.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We identified 3058 consecutive patients who underwent exercise dual isotope SPECT, who on follow-up (mean, 1.6+/-0.5 years; 3.6% lost to follow-up) were found to have 70 hard events (2.3% hard-event rate). Survival analysis used a Cox proportional hazards model, and cost-effectiveness was determined by the cost per hard event identified by strategies with versus without the use of SPECT. In this cohort, a normal study was associated with an exceedingly low hard-event rate (0.4% per year) that increased significantly as a function of the SPECT result. After adjusting for pre-SPECT information, exercise stress SPECT yielded incremental value for the prediction of hard events (chi2 52 to 85, P<0.001) and significantly stratified patients. In patients with intermediate to high likelihood of coronary artery disease after exercise treadmill testing, a cost-effectiveness ratio of $25 134 per hard event identified and a cost of $5417 per reclassification of patient risk were found. Subset analyses revealed similar prognostic, and cost results were present in men, women, and patients with and without prior histories of coronary artery disease.

CONCLUSIONS

Stress SPECT yields incremental prognostic value and enhanced risk stratification in patients with normal resting ECGs in a cost-effective manner. These findings are opposite those of previous studies examining anatomic end points in this same population and thus, if confirmed, have significant implications for patient management.

Cardiovascular stress testing: a description of the various types of stress tests and indications for their use

OBJECTIVE

To describe the various types of stress tests and to provide guidelines for selecting a specific test for an individual patient.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Myocardial perfusion imaging, radionuclide angiography, stress echocardiography, and cardiopulmonary exercise testing are described. The advantages and limitations of these techniques are reviewed and compared with those of standard treadmill exercise testing. The agents used for pharmacologic stress testing are discussed.

RESULTS

Standard treadmill exercise testing is widely available and is less expensive than the imaging techniques. It is most accurate in patients with normal findings on a resting electrocardiogram who are not taking digoxin. In these patients, standard exercise electrocardiography is almost as accurate as the exercise imaging modalities for identifying those with left main or three-vessel coronary artery disease. Advantages of the stress imaging modalities in comparison with standard exercise electrocardiography include greater accuracy when the resting electrocardiogram shows abnormal findings, higher sensitivity, ability to localize and characterize the extent of myocardial ischemia, and direct measurement of other variables such as left ventricular function. These techniques must be performed carefully in experienced laboratories in order to provide accurate information. Published data are scant that directly compare one technique with another in the same set of patients. The nuclear cardiology techniques have been well validated for detecting left main and three-vessel coronary artery disease and for assessing prognosis. Myocardial perfusion imaging has been well validated for detecting ischemia in patients with abnormal left ventricular function at rest. In comparison with the nuclear cardiology techniques, stress echocardiography is less expensive and provides more ancillary information but has not been as well validated for assessment of severe coronary artery disease or prognosis. Cardiopulmonary exercise testing can be useful in selecting patients for cardiac transplantation and in assessing exertional dyspnea in selected patients. The most common application of pharmacologic stress testing is preoperative risk assessment of patients undergoing noncardiac operations. Pharmacologic stress testing should usually be reversed for patients who are unable to exercise adequately.

CONCLUSION

Most patients with normal findings on a resting electrocardiogram who are not taking digoxin should undergo standard treadmill exercise testing for diagnostic and prognostic purposes. Most patients with abnormal findings on a resting electrocardiogram should undergo one of the stress imaging techniques. Selecting a specific stress imaging techniques. should depend primarily on local expertise with the various techniques and secondarily on the strengths and limitations of the techniques as they relate to the individual patient.

Risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction by exercise radionuclide angiography and exercise electrocardiography

BACKGROUND

The results of multicenter trials indicate that patients with left ventricular dysfunction and either three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease have improved prognosis when treated surgically.

OBJECTIVE

As part of a larger evaluation and follow-up study of coronary artery disease, the objective of this investigation was to determine whether exercise radionuclide angiography can be used, in patients with mild symptoms of coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction at rest, to identify patients with three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Eighty-four consecutive patients were studied with angiographically defined coronary artery disease in whom left ventricular ejection fraction at rest ranged from 20% to 40%. Patients underwent exercise electrocardiography, rest and exercise radionuclide angiography, and 24-hour electrocardiographic monitoring. There were 22 patients with one-vessel, 31 with two-vessel, 27 with three-vessel, and four with left main coronary artery disease. All but four patients had a documented history of myocardial infarction. By univariate analysis, the following parameters were related to the anatomic severity of coronary artery disease: magnitude of ST segment depression with exercise (p < 0.001), magnitude of change in ejection fraction with exercise (p < 0.005), and occurrence of angina during exercise (p < 0.005). However, because of the extensive overlap among anatomic subgroups, no single factor had both a satisfactory sensitivity and a satisfactory specificity in identifying patients with three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease. Multivariate stepwise regression analysis also failed to predict three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease satisfactorily (sensitivity 73% and specificity 73%; positive predictive accuracy 59% and negative predictive accuracy 83%). Nonetheless, this multivariate analysis provided important prognostic information. During medical therapy (mean follow-up 56 months), the patients with a high likelihood of three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease had a greater risk of death or reinfarction than had patients with a low likelihood (p < 0.05). These functional data were better than coronary anatomy alone in providing risk stratification. Four of six patients with two-vessel disease who died were classified incorrectly by the multivariate analysis in the high-likelihood group for three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease, but classified correctly as being at high risk; whereas none of the patients with three-vessel disease who were misclassified in the low-likelihood group died during medical therapy.

CONCLUSION

Although exercise radionuclide angiography in patients with minimal symptoms of coronary artery disease and left ventricular dysfunction is not precise in predicting three-vessel or left main coronary artery disease, it provides important functional information regarding subsequent prognosis during medical therapy.

Role of nuclear cardiology for determining management of patients with stable coronary artery disease

Both radionuclide angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging provide important insights that determine the management of patients with stable coronary artery disease. Both nuclear cardiology procedures have clearly demonstrated use in the noninvasvie identification of severe (left main or three-vessel) coronary artery disease and the noninvasive assessment of prognosis and thereby determine which patients should be sent to coronary angiography. Both radionuclide angiography and myocardial perfusion imaging provide prognostic information that is independent of resting left ventricular function and coronary anatomy and thereby influence the decision regarding which patients should be sent to coronary revascularization. This review considers the evidence supporting the uses of these nuclear cardiology procedures and provides suggestions regarding their cost-effective application.

Prognostic assessment in coronary artery disease: role of radionuclide angiography

Left ventricular function is one of the most important determinants, if not the most important determinant, of outcome in patients with coronary artery disease. The ability of radionuclide angiography to assess resting and exercise ejection fraction accurately and reproducibly has been shown to be a critical determinant of survival in large-scale studies of survivors of myocardial infarction, as well as patients with chronic stable angina. In addition, several centers have demonstrated that the exercise ejection fraction is an extremely valuable (and perhaps the most valuable) noninvasive parameter in predicting survival among patients with coronary artery disease. The prognostic insights gained from the exercise ejection fraction add incremental predictive information to the coronary anatomic information obtained from coronary arteriography, especially in patients with multivessel disease and those with left ventricular dysfunction at rest.

Diagnostic and prognostic value of dipyridamole echocardiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Comparison with exercise electrocardiography

BACKGROUND

Before any new diagnostic test is accepted in clinical practice, such a test should be compared with established diagnostic tools in an appropriately large series of patients encompassing the complete spectrum of challenges to which the test is exposed. The aim of the present study was to assess the relative diagnostic and prognostic accuracies of high-dose dipyridamole echocardiography (two-dimensional echocardiographic monitoring during dipyridamole infusion up to 0.84 mg/kg over 10 hours) versus maximal symptom-limited bicycle exercise ECG test in patients with angina.

METHODS AND RESULTS

We studied 429 consecutive in-hospital patients who met the following inclusion criteria: history of chest pain, off antianginal therapy for at least 2 days (1 week for beta-blockers), no previous myocardial infarction and/or obvious regional left ventricular dyssynergy of contraction (akinesis or dyskinesis) at baseline, and acceptable acoustic window under resting conditions. All patients underwent dipyridamole echocardiography and exercise ECG--on different days and in random order--within 1 week of coronary angiography (which was performed independent of test results) and were followed up for 37.8 +/- 14 months (range, 1 to 73 months). Criteria of positivity were for dipyridamole echocardiography, a transient regional dyssynergy absent in the baseline examination; for exercise ECG, an ST-segment shift of > or = 0.1 mV from baseline; and for coronary angiography, a luminal reduction of > or = 75% in at least one major coronary vessel (50% for left main). There were 183 patients without and 246 with coronary artery disease; 132 had one-, 70 had two-, and 44 had three- and/or left main vessel disease. The specificity was higher for dipyridamole echocardiography than for exercise ECG (90% versus 51%, P < .001). The overall sensitivity of dipyridamole echocardiography was similar to that of exercise ECG (75% versus 74%, P = NS), with no significant differences in the subset with one- (67% versus 69%, P = NS), two- (79% versus 77%, P = NS), or three- (93% versus 86%, P = NS) vessel disease. During the follow-up, there were 20 deaths, 13 nonfatal myocardial infarctions, and 126 revascularization procedures. In the univariate analysis, dipyridamole resulted in higher chi 2 values than did exercise stress testing. A Cox forward stepwise survival analysis identified the dipyridamole time as the most powerful prognostic predictor of death (chi 2 = 19.4, P < .0001) of all invasive and noninvasive parameters. The dipyridamole time also provided independent and additional prognostic information when it was adjusted for age, diabetes, resting ECG, and exercise stress test according to a modified, interactive stepwise procedure. This is true when death only, death and myocardial infarction, and death, myocardial infarction, and revascularization procedures were considered end points.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with no previous myocardial infarction and good resting left ventricular function, compared with exercise ECG, dipyridamole echocardiography has a similar sensitivity and a higher specificity for the noninvasive detection of angiographically assessed coronary artery disease. Dipyridamole echocardiography also provides information in addition to that provided by exercise ECG for predicting death, infarction, and all events when the presence as well as the timing, severity, and extension of dipyridamole-induced wall motion abnormalities are considered.

Radionuclide angiography for risk stratification of patients with coronary artery disease

Radionuclide angiography has become an accepted diagnostic method that is relied upon for its rapid, accurate and quantitative capabilities to characterize LV function. This method will continue to be used extensively in the future for the evaluation of patients with CAD. In addition to its common use to measure LV function at rest, the application of radionuclide angiography to assess LV function during exercise has proven prognostic potential that can be used in the clinical decision-making process in patients with known or suspected CAD.