Effectiveness of once-daily monotherapy with a new nifedipine sustained release calcium antagonist

Time course for blood pressure lowering of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers

BACKGROUND

Calcium channel blockers are a heterogeneous class of drugs, including dihydropyridine and non-dihydropyridine subgroups, commonly used in the treatment of hypertension. A systematic review of the 24-hour time course of the blood pressure-lowering effect has not been published.

OBJECTIVES

To assess how much variation there is in hourly systolic and diastolic blood pressure lowering by dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers over a 24-hour period in people with hypertension aged 18 years or over, with baseline systolic blood pressure of at least 140 mmHg or diastolic blood pressure of at least 90 mmHg, or both.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed electronic searches of the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) (Issue 1, 2014), MEDLINE (1946 to February 2014), EMBASE (1974 to February 2014), and ClinicalTrials.gov (to February 2014). We also screened references of published studies and reviews to identify additional trials.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included all randomized, placebo-controlled trials assessing the hourly effects of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in adults with hypertension with a follow-up of at least three weeks.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors independently selected the included trials, evaluated the risk of bias, and analyzed the data.

MAIN RESULTS

We included 16 randomized controlled trials of dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers in this systematic review, with 2768 randomized participants. Drugs studied included amlodipine, lercanidipine, mandipine, nifedipine, and felodipine (all administered once daily) and nicardipine (administered twice daily). We analyzed and presented data by hour post dose. The blood pressure-lowering effect was stable over time; there were no clinically important differences in blood pressure-lowering effect of calcium channel blockers between each hour for either systolic blood pressure (estimated mean hourly differences ranged between 9.45 mmHg and 13.2 mmHg) or diastolic blood pressure (estimated mean hourly differences ranged between 5.85 mmHg and 8.5 mmHg). However, there was a moderate risk of bias for this finding. Once-daily dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers appeared to lower blood pressure by a relatively constant amount throughout the 24-hour dosing interval.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Six dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers studied in this review lowered blood pressure by a relatively similar amount each hour over the course of 24 hours. The benefits and harms of this pattern of blood pressure lowering are unknown. Further trials are needed with accurate recording of time of drug intake and with reporting of standard deviation of blood pressure at each hour. We did not attempt to assess adverse effects in this review due to the lack of reporting and the short duration of follow-up.

Peripheral edema associated with calcium channel blockers: incidence and withdrawal rate--a meta-analysis of randomized trials

OBJECTIVE

Peripheral edema is considered to be a common and annoying adverse effect of calcium channel blockers (CCBs). It has been thought to occur secondary to arteriolar dilatation causing intracapillary hypertension and fluid extravasation. We aimed to evaluate the incidence and withdrawal rate of peripheral edema with CCBs.

METHODS

A systematic search was made in PubMed, EMBASE and CENTRAL from 1980 to January 2011 for randomized clinical trials reporting peripheral edema with CCBs in patients with hypertension. Trials enrolling at least 100 patients in the CCB arm and lasting at least 4 weeks were included in the analysis. Both the incidence and withdrawal rate due to edema were pooled by weighing each trial by the inverse of the variance. Head-to-head comparison was done to evaluate the risk of edema between newer lipophilic dihydropyridine (DHP) CCBs and older DHPs.

RESULTS

One hundred and six studies with 99 469 participants, mean age 56 ± 6 years, satisfied our inclusion criteria and were included in this analysis. The weighted incidence of peripheral edema was significantly higher in the CCBs group when compared with controls/placebo (10.7 vs. 3.2%, P < 0.0001). Similarly, the withdrawal rate due to edema was higher in patients on CCBs compared with control/placebo (2.1 vs. 0.5%, P < 0.0001). Both the incidence of edema and patient withdrawal rate due to edema increased with the duration of therapy with CCBs reaching 24 and 5%, respectively, after 6 months. The risk of peripheral edema with lipophilic DHPs was 57% lower than with traditional DHPs (relative risk 0.43; 95% confidence interval 0.34-0.53; P < 0.0001). Incidence of peripheral edema in patients on DHPs was 12.3% compared with 3.1% with non-DHPs (P < 0.0001). Edema with high-dose CCBs (defined as more than half the usual maximal dose) was 2.8 times higher than that with low-dose CCBs (16.1 vs. 5.7%, P < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of peripheral edema progressively increased with duration of CCB therapy up to 6 months. Over the long term, more than 5% of patients discontinued CCBs because of this adverse effect. Edema rates were lower with both non-DHPs and lipophilic DHPs.

Chronobiology and chronotherapy of ischemic heart disease

The occurrence of the clinical manifestations of ischemic heart disease (IHD)--myocardial ischemia and angina pectoris, acute myocardial infarction, and sudden cardiac death--is unevenly distributed during the 24 h with greater than expected events during the initial hours of the daily activity span and in the late afternoon or early evening. Such temporal patterns result from circadian rhythms in pathophysiological mechanisms plus cyclic environmental stressors that trigger ischemic events. Both the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of many, though not all, anti-ischemic oral nitrate, calcium channel blocker, and beta-adrenoceptor antagonist medications have been shown to be influenced by the circadian time of their administration. The requirement for preventive and therapeutic interventions varies predictably during the 24 h, and thus therapeutic strategies should also be tailored accordingly to optimize outcomes. During the past decade, two first generation calcium channel blocker chronotherapies have been developed, trialed, and marketed in North America for the improved treatment of IHD. Nonetheless, there has been relatively little investigation of the administration-time (circadian rhythm) dependencies of the PK and PD of conventional anti-ischemic medications, and there has been little progress in the development of new generation IHD chronotherapies. Available epidemiologic, pharmacologic, and clinico-therapeutic evidence demonstrates how the chronobiologic approach to IHD can contribute new insight and opportunities to improve drug design and drug delivery to enhance therapeutic outcomes.

Modified-release nifedipine: a review of the use of modified-release formulations in the treatment of hypertension and angina pectoris

Nifedipine is a dihydropyridine calcium channel antagonist with predominantly vasodilatory activity. Modified-release formulations of nifedipine are effective antihypertensive and antianginal therapies and are generally well tolerated. Among the available formulations, those that produce a gradual increase in plasma nifedipine concentration, which is then sustained over a 24-hour period, are preferred, as they cause a gradual onset of vasodilatation and avoid baroreflex sympathetic activation (for example, nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system [GITS] and a Japanese controlled-release formulation). Modified-release nifedipine had beneficial effects on a number of markers of vascular function, and nifedipine GITS reduced the need for coronary procedures in patients with coronary artery disease. In patients with hypertension, nifedipine GITS and nifedipine retard had beneficial effects on the overall incidence of major cardiovascular events, as did nifedipine retard in patients with concurrent hypertension and coronary artery disease.

Trough-to-peak versus surface ratio in the assessment of antihypertensive agents. APTH Investigators. Ambulatory Blood Pressure and Treatment of Hypertension

This study investigated whether the 'surface ratio', a novel index to characterize long-acting antihypertensive agents, would provide a more reproducible estimate of the duration of the antihypertensive effect than the more commonly used trough-to-peak ratio. In 66 hypertensive patients (diastolic pressure on conventional measurement > 95 mmHg), the ambulatory blood pressure was measured on a placebo at baseline and 2 months later, while the patients took 10 mg lisinopril once a day between 7 p.m. and 11 p.m. Diurnal treatment effect curves were obtained by subtracting the blood pressure at baseline from the corresponding value at 2 months for all time intervals considered in the analysis. In order to calculate the surface ratio, the area under the treatment effect curve was divided by the product of the maximal blood pressure lowering effect and the dosing interval (24 h). Reproducibility of the trough-to-peak and surface ratios was investigated by the Bland and Altman techniques. At 2 months, lisinopril reduced (+/- standard deviation) the 24 h pressure by 13 +/- 16 mmHg systolic and by 8 +/- 8 mmHg diastolic (p < 0.001). According to the usual approach, disregarding inter-individual variability, the trough-to-peak ratio was 0.7 for systolic and diastolic pressure. When in individual patients diurnal treatment effects curves with a 1 h resolution were investigated, the median trough-to-peak ratio was 0.30 for systolic pressure (5th-95th percentile interval [PI]: -0.51, 0.82) and 0.28 for diastolic pressure (PI: -0.37, 0.78); the corresponding values for the surface ratio were 0.33 (PI: 0.03, 0.58) and 0.30 (PI: -0.01, 0.55). In the same manner, the trough-to-peak ratios and surface ratios became larger when the individual blood pressure profiles were progressively smoothed by substituting 1 h averages by 2 h moving averages, 2 h averages, 3 h moving averages or by 3 h averages. The distributions of the trough-to-peak ratios and surface ratios were non-normal in 37 of 40 instances (p < 0.001, Shapiro-Wilk's test). Consistency was higher (p < 0.001) for the surface than for the trough-to-peak ratios. The within-subject reproducibility of the surface ratios tended to be superior to that of the corresponding trough-to-peak ratios. In conclusion, the surface ratio provides an index of the duration of action of antihypertensive agents. Moreover, in the present patients, the surface ratio tended to be characterized by a higher within-subject reproducibility than the trough-to-peak ratio.