Assessing diagnostic criteria for active infective endocarditis

Changing microbiological profile and antimicrobial susceptibility of the isolates obtained from patients with infective endocarditis - The time to relook into the therapeutic guidelines

The microbiological profile, associated risk factors and demographic characteristics of patients with IE has changed in the recent times. In the present study, the antibiotic susceptibility profile of 66 isolates (40 from IDU and 26 from non IDU) recovered over a period of three years from the patients with definitive diagnosis of IE along with their absolute minimum inhibitory concentrations (MIC-μg/ml) was determined as per CLSI, 2017 guidelines. Staphylococcus aureus was found to be the predominant pathogen associated with IE out of which 90.2% isolates were MRSA, although none of the isolates were found resistant to vancomycin, teicoplanin, daptomycin and linezolid. Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates were 100% susceptible to carbapenams, however variable resistance was observed against other antimicrobials. All Enterococci were found to be 100% susceptible to linezolid and daptomycin, whereas vancomycin resistant enterococci phenotype was observed in 25% of the Enterococcal isolates. A noticeable difference in the antimicrobial susceptibility profile and their MICs were observed in the present study, as compared to published literature across the globe and within the country. However, no statistically significant difference (λ ² test, p > 0.01)in the AST pattern of isolates from IDU vs. Non IDU was observed. After reviewing the local antibiogram it seems that we need to have our own regional guidelines, which may partially replace the currently prevailing AHA/ESC guidelines.

Infective Endocarditis in Adults: Diagnosis, Antimicrobial Therapy, and Management of Complications: A Scientific Statement for Healthcare Professionals From the American Heart Association

BACKGROUND

Infective endocarditis is a potentially lethal disease that has undergone major changes in both host and pathogen. The epidemiology of infective endocarditis has become more complex with today's myriad healthcare-associated factors that predispose to infection. Moreover, changes in pathogen prevalence, in particular a more common staphylococcal origin, have affected outcomes, which have not improved despite medical and surgical advances.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This statement updates the 2005 iteration, both of which were developed by the American Heart Association under the auspices of the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease of the Young. It includes an evidence-based system for diagnostic and treatment recommendations used by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association for treatment recommendations.

CONCLUSIONS

Infective endocarditis is a complex disease, and patients with this disease generally require management by a team of physicians and allied health providers with a variety of areas of expertise. The recommendations provided in this document are intended to assist in the management of this uncommon but potentially deadly infection. The clinical variability and complexity in infective endocarditis, however, dictate that these recommendations be used to support and not supplant decisions in individual patient management.

Treatment strategies for infective endocarditis

IMPORTANCE OF THE FIELD

Despite significant advances in medical, surgical, and critical care interventions, infective endocarditis (IE) remains a disease associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. Estimates from the American Heart Association place the incidence of IE in the US at 10,000 - 15,000 new cases each year. This may be due to the changing epidemiology of IE, including increasing antimicrobial resistance, increasing heart surgeries, prosthetic valve implantation, and widespread use of intravenous drugs. Furthermore, a new form of the disease, healthcare-associated IE, which is associated with new therapeutic modalities such as intravenous catheters, hyperalimentation lines, pacemakers, and dialysis shunts, has emerged.

AREAS COVERED IN THIS REVIEW

We present the latest therapeutic and preventive strategies for IE caused by a variety of bacterial and fungal pathogens. The general methods employed included an extensive literature search, confined to the last 10 years, using key words such as 'infective endocarditis', 'culture-negative endocarditis', 'treatment guidelines for IE', and 'prophylaxis for IE'.

WHAT THE READER WILL GAIN

Comprehensive information regarding the changing epidemiology of IE is provided. The latest guidelines with respect to therapy and prophylaxis of IE are reviewed.

TAKE HOME MESSAGE

Successful management of IE depends on maintaining a high index of suspicion for the disease and, when IE is diagnosed, close cooperation of medical and surgical disciplines is required. Further research is needed to better understand and provide optimal therapy for complex situations such as multidrug-resistant and polymicrobial IE.

Relative value of clinical and transesophageal echocardiographic variables for risk stratification in patients with infective endocarditis

BACKGROUND

Infective endocarditis remains a life-threatening disease, and its optimal management is of paramount importance. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is useful for the diagnosis of endocarditis-induced lesions, but the prognostic significance of the method remains controversial.

HYPOTHESIS

The purpose of this study was to relate clinical and TEE characteristics to the occurrence of mortality and/or systemic embolization in a consecutive series of 45 patients with a diagnosis of infective endocarditis.

METHODS

All patients underwent at least one monoplane TEE. Clinical data, episodes of embolization, and echocardiographic characteristics were prospectively recorded. Stepwise logistic discriminant analysis was performed to identify the independent variables that best predicted three binary outcomes: systemic embolization, death, and systemic embolization and/or death.

RESULTS

Twelve of the 45 patients (27%) died from the endocarditis. Significant univariate predictors of death were the presence of paravalvular abscess (p = 0.025), number of vegetations (p = 0.021), Staphylococcus aureus isolated in blood cultures (p = 0.002), medical treatment alone (p < 0.002), and systemic embolism (p < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, systemic embolism (chi 2 = 29.3; p < 0.01), echocardiographic evidence of paravalvular abscess (chi 2 = 5.6; p = 0.018), Staphylococcus aureus endocarditis (chi 2 = 5.5; p = 0.016), and medical treatment alone (chi 2 = 5.11; p = 0.024) emerged as optimal predictors of death. Systemic embolization occurred in 12 patients. Independent variables predicting systemic embolization were a total length of vegetations > 14 mm (p = 0.01), greater age (p = 0.02), and medical treatment alone (p = 0.03). When two or more vegetations were observed, the total length is the sum of the individual sizes. Independent risk factors for the development of systemic emboli and/or death as a combined end point were total length of vegetations on TEE (chi 2 = 6.4; p = 0.003) and medical treatment alone (chi 2 = 4.1; p = 0.047).

CONCLUSIONS

High-risk patients may be identified by the combination of clinical variables and TEE characteristics.

Infective endocarditis: diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of complications: a statement for healthcare professionals from the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease in the Young, and the Councils on Clinical Cardiology, Stroke, and Cardiovascular Surgery and Anesthesia, American Heart Association: endorsed by the Infectious Diseases Society of America

BACKGROUND

Despite advances in medical, surgical, and critical care interventions, infective endocarditis remains a disease that is associated with considerable morbidity and mortality. The continuing evolution of antimicrobial resistance among common pathogens that cause infective endocarditis creates additional therapeutic issues for physicians to manage in this potentially life-threatening illness.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This work represents the third iteration of an infective endocarditis "treatment" document developed by the American Heart Association under the auspices of the Committee on Rheumatic Fever, Endocarditis, and Kawasaki Disease, Council on Cardiovascular Disease of the Young. It updates recommendations for diagnosis, treatment, and management of complications of infective endocarditis. A multidisciplinary committee of experts drafted this document to assist physicians in the evolving care of patients with infective endocarditis in the new millennium. This extensive document is accompanied by an executive summary that covers the key points of the diagnosis, antimicrobial therapy, and management of infective endocarditis. For the first time, an evidence-based scoring system that is used by the American College of Cardiology and the American Heart Association was applied to treatment recommendations. Tables also have been included that provide input on the use of echocardiography during diagnosis and treatment of infective endocarditis, evaluation and treatment of culture-negative endocarditis, and short-term and long-term management of patients during and after completion of antimicrobial treatment. To assist physicians who care for children, pediatric dosing was added to each treatment regimen.

CONCLUSIONS

The recommendations outlined in this update should assist physicians in all aspects of patient care in the diagnosis, medical and surgical treatment, and follow-up of infective endocarditis, as well as management of associated complications. Clinical variability and complexity in infective endocarditis, however, dictate that these guidelines be used to support and not supplant physician-directed decisions in individual patient management.

Value and limitations of the von Reyn, Duke, and modified Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis in children

OBJECTIVE

To compare the sensitivity of 3 different criteria-von Reyn, Duke, and modified Duke-in diagnosing infective endocarditis (IE) in children.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective case study in a tertiary pediatric hospital.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Between 1985 and 2001, 41 episodes of IE were documented in 40 children (median: 7 years old; range: 1 week to 18 years). The diagnosis was based on echocardiographic and microbiologic or pathologic findings. The initial echocardiogram suggested IE in 95% of the cases. Main findings were vegetations in 36, perivalvular abscess in 4, and/or new valvular leaks in 6 cases. In 31 (76%) of the 41 episodes, the causative organisms were identified directly by specimen bacteriology or blood cultures (BCs) or indirectly by polymerase chain reaction or serology. Sensitivities of the von Reyn, Duke, and modified Duke criteria in diagnosing IE were 63%, 81%, and 88%, respectively. In 10 cases (22%), the diagnosis of IE was "rejected" by the von Reyn criteria but was "definite or possible" by the Duke and modified Duke criteria. In 3 cases, the diagnosis of IE was "possible" by the Duke but "definite" by the modified Duke criteria: 2 of the 3 cases had 1 major and >or=3 minor symptoms, and 1 had Q fever. Five episodes (12%) were classified as "possible" IE by the modified Duke criteria: although major findings were present on echocardiography, no organism was identified on repeat BCs. Positive BC was the only criterion that differentiated "definite" from "possible" IE.

CONCLUSIONS

The modified Duke classification was more sensitive in diagnosing IE in children than the von Reyn and Duke criteria. Still, 12% failed to be classified as "definite" IE by the modified Duke criteria. This illustrates the importance of positive BCs as a major IE criterion while significant echocardiographic findings are less considered by the presently used criteria.

Risk factors for infective endocarditis: oral hygiene and nondental exposures

BACKGROUND

The risks of infective endocarditis (IE) associated with various conditions and procedures are poorly defined.

METHODS AND RESULTS

This was a population-based case-control study conducted in 54 Philadelphia, Pa-area hospitals from 1988 to 1990. Community-acquired IE cases unassociated with intravenous drug use were compared with matched community residents. Subjects were interviewed for risk factors. Diagnoses were confirmed by expert review of medical record abstracts with risk factor data removed. Cases were more likely than controls to suffer from prior severe kidney disease (adjusted OR [95% CI]=16.9 [1.5 to 193], P:=0.02) and diabetes mellitus (adjusted OR [95% CI]=2.7 [1.4 to 5.2], P:=0.004). Cases infected with skin flora had received intravenous fluids more often (adjusted OR [95% CI]=6.7 [1.1 to 41], P:=0.04) and had more often had a previous skin infection (adjusted OR [95% CI]=3.5 [0.7 to 17], P:=0.11). No association was seen with pulmonary, gastrointestinal, cardiac, or genitourinary procedures or with surgery. Edentulous patients had a lower risk of IE from dental flora than patients who had teeth but did not floss. Daily flossing was associated with a borderline decreased IE risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Within the limits of the available sample size, the data showed that IE patients differ from people without IE with regard to certain important risk factors but not regarding recent procedures.

Individual value of each of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis

OBJECTIVES: To assess the value of each of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE). METHODS: Detailed review was done of charts of all cases discharged with the diagnosis of IE, and classification as 'definite', 'possible' and 'rejected' cases was made according to the Duke criteria. The diagnostic impact of each criterion was assessed by reclassifying each 'definite' case after subtraction of each individual criterion and by reclassifying each 'possible' and 'rejected' case after addition of each individual criterion. RESULTS: From 1983 to 1993, 179 cases were identified in the databases of two hospitals. When the Duke criteria were applied, 124 (6967%) were classed as 'definite', 43 (2466%) as 'possible' and 12 (763%) as 'rejected' cases. Of the 67 pathologically proven cases, 52 (78610%) were 'definite' cases when the criteria were applied before pathology. If the major microbiological criterion is subtracted, 53% (69%) of the 'definite' cases become 'possible' or 'rejected'. When the echocardiographic criterion is subtracted, 34% (68%) of the 'definite' cases become possible or rejected. Among minor criteria, fever and predisposition, contributing to the classification of respectively 31% (68%) and 27% (68%) of the 'definite' cases, were the most powerful. On the other hand, the minor microbiological criterion and immunologic phenomena were responsible for the classification of only 2% (62%) and 6% (64%) respectively, of the 'definite' cases. CONCLUSIONS: Depending on the criterion examined, 47-98% of the 'definite' cases of IE would remain 'definite' if this particular criterion were absent. The major microbiological criterion had the highest relative importance. In this retrospective study, in which only 32 (18%) patients had a transesophageal echocardiogram, the echocardiogram contributed to 15% (66%) of the 'definite' cases according to the major criterion and to 19% (66%) according to the minor criterion. This study illustrates that the degree of certainty of the diagnosis of IE often depends on the presence/absence of only one criterion.

Value and limitations of the Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis

OBJECTIVES

The purpose of this study was to assess the value and limitations of Duke criteria for the diagnosis of infective endocarditis (IE).

BACKGROUND

Duke criteria have been shown to be more sensitive in diagnosing IE than the von Reyn criteria, but the diagnosis of IE remains difficult in some patients.

METHODS

Both classifications were applied in 93 consecutive patients with pathologically proven IE. Blood cultures, and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography were performed in all patients.

RESULTS

Sensitivities for the diagnosis of IE were 56% and 76% for von Reyn and Duke criteria, respectively. Fifty-two patients were correctly classified as "probable IE" by von Reyn and "definite IE" by Duke criteria (group 1). However, discrepancies were observed in 41 patients. Eleven patients (group 2) were misclassified as "rejected" by von Reyn, but were "definite IE" by Duke criteria; this difference could be explained by negative blood cultures and positive echocardiogram in all patients. In eight patients (group 3), the diagnosis of IE was "possible" by von Reyn but "definite" by Duke criteria. This difference was essentially explained by the failure of the von Reyn classification to consider echocardiographic abnormalities as major criteria. Twenty-two patients (group 4) were misclassified as possible IE using Duke criteria, being false negative of this classification. Echocardiographic major criteria were present in 19 patients, but blood cultures were negative in 21 patients. The cause of negative blood cultures was prior antibiotic therapy in 11 patients and Q-fever endocarditis diagnosed by positive serology in three cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Twenty-four percent of patients with proved IE remain misclassified as "possible IE" despite the use of Duke criteria, especially in cases of culture-negative and Q-fever IE. Increasing the diagnostic value of echographic criteria in patients with prior antibiotic therapy and typical echocardiographic findings and considering the serologic diagnosis of Q fever as a major criterion would further improve the clinical diagnosis of IE.

[Tricuspid valve endocarditis. Demonstration of a rare disease exemplified with 3 case reports]

BACKGROUND

Endocarditis of the tricuspid valve is a rare form of valvular endocarditis and occurs mainly in patients with special risk factors.

CASE REPORTS

The three case reports demonstrate 3 young patients (age 30 to 37 years, 2 female and 1 male) with a typical history of those risk factors. The two women were intravenous drug addicts and one of them had suffered already an episode of tricuspid valve endocarditis several years ago. The man developed his infection after implantation of a pacemaker. In all of the three patients the endocarditis was due to infection with staphylococci twice staphylococcus epidermidis and once staphylococcus aureus. In two of the three patients the endocarditis could not be cured by intravenous antibiotics alone and these patients had to undergo cardiac valvular surgery. All patients left the hospital after several weeks without signs of infection.

CONCLUSION

In clinical praxis the introduction of a special endocarditis service, a small team which has to be consulted in every suspected case of endocarditis, seems to be beneficial as well as the use of the Duke criteria for diagnosis in those cases.

Infective endocarditis in congenital heart disease

The average life expectancy of patients with congenital heart disease has dramatically improved over the past four decades because of advances in medical and surgical therapy, with patients with complex lesions surviving to adolescence and adulthood. Tetralogy of Fallot, transposition of the great arteries, ventricular septal defects, patent ductus, and bicuspid aortic valves in particular are susceptible to infective endocarditis. Most operated patients are left with some form of residua or sequelae, many of which predispose to infective endocarditis. Surgical palliation, such as systemic-to-pulmonary shunts, and reparative surgery, often requiring prosthetic valve or conduit replacement, are major predisposing conditions. Accordingly, recognition, prevention, and treatment strategies for infective endocarditis assume increasing importance in adolescents and adults with congenital heart disease, operated or not.

Negative predictive value of the Duke criteria for infective endocarditis

With use of new Duke criteria, 405 episodes of suspected endocarditis were previously classified as "definite," "possible," or "rejected" endocarditis. To determine the negative predictive value of the Duke clinical criteria for the classification of suspected endocarditis, chart review and follow-up were performed for the 52 episodes in which the diagnosis of endocarditis was rejected. Three of 52 episodes were reclassified to possible endocarditis; 49 episodes in 48 patients met the criteria for rejected endocarditis. Of these 49 episodes, 31 (63%) had a firm alternate diagnosis other than endocarditis, 17 (35%) had resolution of the clinical syndrome leading to the suspicion of endocarditis with < or = 4 days of antibiotics, and 1 patient had no evidence of endocarditis at surgery. Echocardiograms recorded in 3 patients with rejected endocarditis had evidence of oscillating valvular masses, and blood cultures were positive in 13 episodes; none of these patients had evidence of endocarditis at follow-up. Follow-up or outcome information was available in all 49 episodes. Excluding the 5 in-hospital deaths, mean duration (+/- SD) of follow-up was 39.9 +/- 28.8 months (range 0.5 to 108.0); in living patients, mean time to final follow-up was 56.2 +/- 25.2 months (range 25.0 to 108.0). One patient had possible infective endocarditis at autopsy. No patient in our series whose diagnosis of endocarditis had been rejected had proven endocarditis. Therefore, the negative predictive value of the Duke clinical criteria for endocarditis is at least 92%.

Incidence of infective endocarditis in the Delaware Valley, 1988-1990

This population-based study aimed to determine the incidence of native, prosthetic, and bioprosthetic valve nosocomial infective endocarditis (IE), and IE associated with the use of injected drugs. Patients with IE during 27 months over the years 1988 to 1990, and residing in any of 6 counties in the Philadelphia metropolitan area were identified. An expert panel reviewed all patients to verify the diagnosis. Incidence rates were estimated after adjustment for failure to recruit and underreporting. Of 853 potential patients, 670 (79%) met the inclusion criteria. The overall incidence rate of IE was 11.6 cases/100,000 person-years (95% confidence interval [CI] 10.8 to 12.4). The rates for specific types of IE were: 4.45 (95% CI 3.97 to 4.94) for community-acquired native valve, 0.94 (95% CI 0.72 to 1.12) for prosthetic valve, 0.94 (95% CI 0.71 to 1.16) for nosocomial, and 5.34 (95% CI 4.80 to 5.87) for IE associated with use of injected drugs. Previous population studies found overall incidence rates of 1.7 to 4 cases/100,000 person-years, similar to our rate for community-acquired native valve IE. Type-specific rates have not been previously reported. The higher overall rate in this study is partly related to the high prevalence of injection drug use in our area.