Comparison of clinical effects and pharmacokinetics of once-daily Uniphyl and twice-daily Theo-Dur in asthmatic patients

Effect of once daily and twice daily sustained release theophylline formulations on daytime variation of bronchial hyperresponsiveness in asthmatic patients

BACKGROUND

Previous studies evaluating spirometric values and symptoms have shown that once daily theophylline administered in the evening produces greater stabilisation of the airway function in asthmatic patients than the prototype theophylline given twice a day. The aim of this study was to compare the effects on bronchial responsiveness to methacholine of an ultrasustained release theophylline formulation (Diffumal-24, Malesci, Florence, Italy) administered once a day, a sustained release theophylline formulation (Theo-Dur, Recordati, Milan, Italy) administered twice a day, and placebo.

METHODS

The study was performed in 12 adult patients with asthma using a randomised, double blind, three phase, cross-over design. Each phase lasted seven days and was followed or preceded by at least three days of theophylline washout. Diffumal-24 was administered once a day at 20.00 hours whereas Theo-Dur was given twice a day at 08.00 hours and 20.00 hours. In each patient the total daily dose of theophylline was the same during both phases. The dose of the two active preparations was titrated to individual needs before the beginning of the study and then given in divided or once daily doses. At 08.00, 14.00, and 20.00 hours on day 7 of each phase serum theophylline concentrations were measured and spirometric tests (FEV1) and bronchial challenge with methacholine were also performed.

RESULTS

When the administration of Diffumal-24 was compared with that of Theo-Dur, a higher serum theophylline concentration of the former was seen in the morning whereas at 20.00 hours the reverse was true. Compared with placebo, at 08.00 hours Diffumal-24 improved FEV1 whereas Theo-Dur did not (difference between treatments 0.29 1, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.45). At 08.00 hours Diffumal-24 decreased bronchial sensitivity to methacholine, expressed as a natural logarithm of PD20, to a greater extent than Theo-Dur (difference between treatments 0.54 log units, 95% CI 0.016 to 1.08). The morning advantage observed with Diffumal-24 administration was not associated with a deterioration in the state of the airway during the daytime, the protective activity against methacholine during the 12 hours of the monitoring period being constant. Furthermore there was no difference in the mean FEV1 between the two treatments at 14.00 and 20.00 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

In adults with stable bronchial asthma treatment with a single dose of Diffumal-24 administered in the evening improved airflow obstruction and reduced bronchial hyperresponsiveness.

Treatment of nocturnal asthma with pulsed-release albuterol

The treatment of nocturnal asthma remains a challenge. We investigated the use of a pulsed-released albuterol in ten patients with nocturnal symptoms of asthma. In a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover designed study, we tested the use of 8 mg of pulsed-release albuterol sulfate (Proventil Repetabs) vs placebo. The pulsed-release albuterol significantly blunted the overnight drop in FEV1, improved peak flow readings in the morning, and decreased subjective awakenings from sleep. We conclude that pulsed-released albuterol is an effective therapeutic option in patients with nocturnal asthma.

Plasma theophylline concentrations and airway function in asthmatic children receiving standard and modified RTC therapy

The effects of three different dosage schedules for sustained-release theophylline (Theolong) were investigated in children with asthma. With regimen II (unequal doses at 0800 h and 2000 h), the maximum plasma theophylline concentration following the evening dose was significantly higher than that following the morning dose, and also was larger than that following the evening dose with regimen I (equal doses at 0800 and 2000 h). With regimen III (equal doses at 0600 h and 2100 h), the mean theophylline concentration-time curve showed a single large peak at 1100 h, whereas with regimen I, there were two peaks at 2300 and at 1400 h. Knowledge that a change of the dosage schedule can affect the pharmacokinetics of theophylline in this way should aid physicians in its safe and effective use.

Conversion of COPD patients from multiple to single dose theophylline. Serum levels and symptom comparison

The objective of the present study was to determine if patients with COPD who were taking Theo-Dur bid or tid (total dose 400 to 900 mg per day) could be safely switched to Uni-Dur, 800 mg given qd at bedtime. Twenty-eight patients were enrolled in the study, and 23 completed the study. The mean daily dose of theophylline prior to the study was 828 mg, while the mean dose after three weeks of Uni-Dur therapy was 783 mg. The mean serum theophylline level 10.5 +/- 3.6h after the last Theo-Dur dose was 10.5 mg/L. After three weeks of Uni-Dur therapy, the mean theophylline level at 8:00 AM was 14.6 mg/L, while the mean theophylline level at 8:00 PM was 9.9 mg/L. This latter level did not differ significantly from that obtained at the start of the study 10.5 +/- 3.6 h after the last dose of Theo-Dur. After three weeks of Uni-Dur therapy, the peak expiratory flow rate, the FEV1, and the FVC were not significantly changed from those at the initial evaluation. Twenty-one of the 23 patients ended up receiving 800 mg Uni-Dur qd. From this study, we conclude that once daily theophylline dosing with Uni-Dur compared with bid or tid dosing with Theo-Dur produces similar theophylline levels and pulmonary function, and most COPD patients who are taking 400 to 900 mg Theo-Dur daily can be managed with 800 mg Uni-Dur once daily at bedtime.

Predictability and intraindividual variability of serum theophylline concentrations in patients with obstructive lung disease: 12-h versus 24-h dosing

The predictability and intraindividual variability of serum theophylline concentrations (STC) after different dosing schedules were investigated in 24 patients with chronic obstructive lung disease (COLD). Three oral regimens were compared in 3 groups of 8 randomly assigned patients. Group I:Drug A once daily in the evening; Group II: Drug A b.d.; Group III: Drug B b.d. The doses for each patient were estimated by Bayesian forecasting aiming at an STC of 10-15 mg/l. STC and FEV1 were measured on two consecutive days at steady-state. The day-to-day variability of STC was less than 20% in all three groups. The within-day fluctuation in Group I amounted to 259% (median) compared to 57% and 38% in Groups II and III, respectively. Dose adjustment by Bayesian forecasting resulted in a therapeutic STC in most patients with a b.d. regimen, whereas for the once daily dose the prediction was not satisfactory. No difference in lung function was found between the 24-h and 12-h dosing, probably because of the large intersubject variability in FEV1. Therefore, the question whether the differences in STC profile are of clinical importance in COLD can only be investigated in a larger group of patients.

Review of the North American experience with evening administration of Uniphyl tablets, a once-daily theophylline preparation, in the treatment of nocturnal asthma

Increasing awareness of the exaggerated circadian rhythm in bronchomotor tone that causes most asthmatic patients to have increased respiratory symptoms in the early morning has resulted in a search for dosing strategies that will provide maximal bronchodilatory activity at the time of reduced bronchial patency. The purpose of this paper is to review briefly the published data on the North American experience with evening administration of the once-daily theophylline preparation, Uniphyl tablets. An increasing body of data demonstrates that this regimen produces peak concentrations of theophylline in the blood during the early morning hours, the time of maximal benefit for patients with nocturnal asthma. These data also show that once-daily Uniphyl administered in the evening is superior to both a once-daily morning Uniphyl schedule and to a conventional twice-daily sustained-release theophylline preparation in reducing early morning bronchoconstriction and associated symptoms.

How much theophylline is enough?

Theophylline not only is a bronchodilator but also has other effects (inhibition of mediator release, enhancement of mucociliary clearance, enhancement of diaphragmatic contractility) that are potentially beneficial to asthmatic patients. Recent studies suggest that theophylline pharmacodynamics vary among asthmatic patients. However, on average, most of the total bronchodilatory response occurs at serum theophylline concentrations of 0 to 10 mg/liter. Additional (but less) bronchodilatation occurs at serum theophylline levels between 10 and 20 mg/liter. Pharmacodynamic relationships are not well established for other therapeutic effects of theophylline, such as attenuation of pharmacologically induced bronchoconstriction. An important feature of oral controlled-release theophylline therapy is timing of drug administration. Because airway reactivity increases and airway caliber decreases at night, it has been suggested that the greatest benefit is derived from theophylline when peak serum concentration is reached during the night or the early morning.

Comparison of once-daily evening versus morning sustained-release theophylline dosing for nocturnal asthma

Eight diurnally active (approximately 0730-1100 hr) adults (41-61 yr) suffering from nocturnal asthma volunteered for a double-blind, cross-over randomized study of a once-daily dosing (600-900 mg/24 hr) of Armophylline (Rorer s.a., France), a sustained-release theophylline given either at 0800 hr or 2000 hr for 8-day durations. Study variables monitored daily were: (a) self-measured peak expiratory flow (PEF), heart rate, oral temperature and self-rated fatigue checked every 2 hr during the waking span as well as upon spontaneous nocturnal awakenings and (b) duration and subjective characteristics of sleep rated every morning. In addition, serum theophylline concentration (STC) plus the variables in (a) were sampled every 2 hr during the 24 hr of the eighth day of each timed treatment span. Rx at 0800 hr was associated with a nocturnal dip in PEF of 20 +/- 2.8% (X +/- S.E.M.) from the level achieved at the time of the diurnal crest; Rx at 2000 hr moderated the nocturnal fall; it was only 10 +/- 2.1% and within the physiologic limits of non-asthmatic persons. The STC peak height (Cmax) was greater (P less than 0.05) and time-to-peak (Tmax) shorter (P less than 0.005) with Rx at 0800 hr than at 2000 hr. With Rx at 2000 hr an STC plateau of approximately 12 hr resulted. A statistically significant correlation (r = 0.86; P less than 0.01) between PEF and the corresponding-in-time STC was observed with Rx at 2000 hr but not with Rx at 0800 hr. A small, but statistically significant, higher heart rate resulted from 2000 hr dosings in five out of eight subjects relative to the 0800 hr dosing. There were no differences in the sleep characteristics nor in oral temperature between dosing times. Once-daily (600-900 mg) SRT dosing at 2000 hr controlled the nocturnal dip of bronchial patency with no major side-effects in diurnally active adult patients with nocturnal allergic asthma.

Treatment of asthma by a controlled-release theophylline tablet formulation: a review of the North American experience with nocturnal dosing

As many as 80 percent of asthmatics experience nighttime or early-morning episodes, which are difficult to treat and potentially fatal. The greater-than-normal amplitude of circadian airflow variation in many asthmatics contributes heavily to the genesis of the early 'morning dip'. Beta-agonists and corticosteroids are of limited usefulness in nocturnal asthma, and slow-release theophylline drugs, while potentially effective, vary in 24-hr blood profile and hence their influence on nocturnal episodes. Traditional 12-hr 'symmetric' theophylline regimens, instead of meeting increased nocturnal demands, may actually produce lower night- than daytime blood levels. On the other hand, appropriately timed administration of a once-daily theophylline drug might provide maximum blood levels when needed and help stabilize 24-hr airflow. Accumulated data, summarized in this review, demonstrate the chronotherapeutic potential of single-daily evening doses of a controlled-release theophylline preparation (Uniphyl 400-mg tablets) in nocturnal and early morning asthma. Nighttime blood concentrations with this regimen were higher than were those with Theo-Dur tablets, B.I.D., in the same total daily doses, or with once-daily morning Uniphyl administration. In fed and fasted subjects, evening administration of Uniphyl 400-mg tablets was well tolerated and did not lead to 'dose dumping.' Clinically, this treatment demonstrated advantages over B.I.D. theophylline, over single-daily morning regimens, and over prior theophylline therapy. Advantages of the evening regimen included better early-morning airflow (without significant decline later in the day), more effective symptom control, better patient acceptance, fewer night awakenings, and the obvious convenience of once-daily dosing. In addition, lung function showed greater stability, throughout the day, with once-daily evening therapy than with traditional 12 hr dosing. Uniphyl 400-mg tablets may be administered once daily to provide maximum blood levels at the time of peak bronchoconstriction, whether at night or during the day.

Chronobiology and asthma. II. Body-time-dependent differences in the kinetics and effects of bronchodilator medications

Several bronchodilator medications exhibit body-time (i.e., biological rhythm)-dependent changes in their pharmacokinetics and effects. Epinephrine (Adrenalin), metaproterenol (orciprenaline), aminophylline, and ipratropium bromide all have a better effect on the tone of the airways during the night and/or morning, when bronchial patency is low, than during the day, when it is high. The pharmacokinetics of sustained-release theophyllines (SRTs) exhibit administration-time differences. Day-night dosing-time differences in the kinetics of theophylline are especially prominent in children. Generally, in day-active asthmatic children the absorption of SRT is more rapid after a morning than an evening dosing. The administration-time effect on the kinetics of SRTs also is apparent in adult patients, but the magnitude of difference between the day versus evening administrations apparently is more moderate. Initial findings from studies of unequal (morning versus evening) BID dosing schedules--more theophylline or terbutaline before bed-time than arising--reveal a better therapeutic advantage relative to equal BID dosing schedules for those patients with predominantly nocturnal symptoms. Once-daily (OD) SRTs intended for delivery of the entire daily dose at a single time also differ quantitatively in their chronokinetics. Since asthma is mainly a nocturnal disease in many patients, it has been recommended by many that ODSRTs be taken in the evening. If taken in the morning, as is the current practice in the United States, they may not ensure therapeutic theophylline blood levels during the night when most needed. Moreover, not all ODSRTs appear suitable for once-nightly administration because of unacceptable kinetics.

Timing of once-a-day theophylline dose to match peak blood level with diurnal variation in severity of asthma

To test the hypothesis that nighttime and early morning signs and symptoms of air flow obstruction in patients with moderately severe asthma would be better controlled by theophylline given on a once-a-day evening dosing schedule chosen to provide a peak blood level in the early morning than by the traditional twice-a-day dosing schedule designed to maintain levels more constant throughout the 24-hour period, the effects on nocturnal asthma of Uniphyl once a day and Theo-Dur twice a day were studied in 14 patients with moderately severe asthma. Although both regimens were effective, more patients preferred the Uniphyl dosing schedule. Nighttime symptoms were better controlled, without an increase in daytime symptoms or significant side effects. Optimal timing of theophylline dosing is an important consideration in the management of asthma.

Pharmacokinetics and clinical response to single- and multiple-dose sustained-release theophylline compounds in perennial bronchial asthma

Nine adult subjects with perennial bronchial asthma participated in a single-blind, cross-over, placebo-controlled study to evaluate and compare the effectiveness of a 24-hour sustained-release theophylline formulation, Uniphyl, with that of a twice-daily compound, Theo-Dur. The subjects took each drug for two weeks and monitored peak expiratory flow and recorded their symptoms in a diary three times daily. At the end of each experimental period, they were hospitalized for 24 hours for determination of the pharmacokinetics of the compound they were taking and the relationship between fluctuations in theophylline blood levels and changes in pulmonary mechanics. Both drugs were highly effective, and no significant differences between formulations were found in any aspects of the study. The results demonstrate that a single daily dose of Uniphyl is an efficacious form of therapy for controlling perennial asthma in adults.