Complications of loop ileostomy

Diverting ileostomy is a risk factor for renal impairment during CAPOX therapy

PURPOSE

Temporary ileostomy is sometimes created after colorectal surgery and may cause renal impairment. However, the impact of ileostomy on renal function during adjuvant chemotherapy for colorectal cancer (CRC) remains unknown. The aim of the present study was to examine the effects of ileostomy on renal function during adjuvant chemotherapy.

METHODS

We examined 184 patients who received adjuvant CAPOX therapy (capecitabine and oxaliplatin) for CRC with or without ileostomy between January 2011 and December 2020 at the University of Tokyo Hospital. Clinicopathological factors, including renal function, were retrospectively reviewed in association with temporary ileostomy. Factors associated with reductions in the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) during CAPOX therapy were analyzed.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients (10%) underwent temporary ileostomy. The maximum decrease in eGFR during CAPOX therapy was significantly higher in patients with than in those without ileostomy (- 16.1 vs. - 5.6 mL/min/1.73m², p = 0.003). A multivariate analysis identified ileostomy as one of factors independently associated with reductions in eGFR during CAPOX therapy (p = 0.003). The cumulative number of readmission due to dehydration was also higher in patients with ileostomy (33% vs. 1%, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Ileostomy significantly reduced eGFR during adjuvant CAPOX therapy. Therefore, renal function needs to be monitored during CAPOX therapy, particularly in patients with ileostomy.

Frequency and Complications of Ileostomy

Introduction

Ileostomies are life-saving procedures used for temporary fecal diversion in complicated cases of ileal perforation. However, an ileostomy is associated with several complications. The goal of this study was to determine the frequency and complications of ileostomy in the Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, Pakistan.

Methodology

We conducted a longitudinal observational study from July 2019 to July 2020. All patients older than age 12 receiving an ileostomy were included. Patient examinations were conducted on the first postoperative day and were assessed for hemorrhage and necrosis. Examinations were conducted on the seventh postoperative day to assess stoma retraction, stenosis, prolapse, and high-output fistula. Patients were monitored via follow-up in the outpatient clinic every 15 days to record any complications for three months until the reversal was performed. All data were analyzed using IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 25.0. (Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.).

Result

A total of 84 patients who received ileostomies were included in the study. Most patients were male (n=62; 73.8%), and 22 were female (26.19%). Of the 84 patients in our study, 34 (40.48%) had tuberculous intestine, 23 (27.38%) had typhoid ileal perforation, 23 (27.38%) were trauma patients, and four patients (4.7%) had gangrenous appendicular perforation. 23 patients (27.3%) were discharged with no complications, and 61 patients (72.69%) developed complications. The most common complication was skin excoriation (19.4%), followed by wound infection (13%), nonfunctioning stoma (11.9%), prolapse and stenosis (6%), retraction (4.7%), high-output fistula (3.5%), parastomal hernia and necrosis (2.3% each), and hemorrhage (1.1%).

Conclusion

Ileostomy is a common and lifesaving surgical diverting procedure. It is still common in our clinic due to late presentation by patients who need the procedure. Complications are common but manageable. Therefore, it is essential to recognize these complications and manage them early to reduce the morbidity of the patients.

Loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective comparison of three techniques

BACKGROUND

Loop ileostomy (LI) formation is a common practice for patients undergoing low anterior resection or restorative ileo-anal pouch surgery. Ileostomy closure can be performed using a stapled or hand-sewn technique, with or without resection. If hand-sewn, the closure can be one or two layers. Randomized controlled trials have not demonstrated one technique to be superior, and meta-analyses are limited by the heterogeneity of published studies. Our primary aim is to compare stapled ileostomy closure with single- and two-layer hand-sewn closures.

METHODS

This retrospective, single-centre cohort study included patients undergoing LI closure between January 1999 and April 2016. Patient demographics, anastomotic technique, operative time and patient outcomes were collected.

RESULTS

Our analysis included 244 patients (median age 67 years, 43.4% female). There were no significant differences in mean operative times (71.5, 73.1 and 88.5 min, for stapled, single- and two-layer hand-sewn closures, respectively, adjusted overall P = 0.262), or morbidity (21.5% versus 20.4% versus 17.6%, adjusted overall P = 0.934) between stapled or hand-sewn anastomoses, and no mortality. Once adjusting for age, sex, American College of Anaesthesiology grade, and consultant surgeon, the length of stay was different (overall P = 0.034), being similar between stapled and single-layer closures (4.2 versus 5.5 days, P = 0.105), but significantly different between stapled and two-layer closures (4.2 versus 8.3 days, P = 0.026).

CONCLUSION

Stapled and single-layered hand-sewn closures are similar in length of procedure, length of stay and complication rates. A two-layer, hand-sewn technique is associated with a significant increase in stay compared to a stapled ileostomy closure.

Evidence-based adoption of purse-string skin closure for stoma wounds

BACKGROUND

Opinion is divided on the optimal technique of skin closure after stoma reversal as most conventional techniques compromise either on speed/neatness of wound apposition or on the incidence of surgical site infection (SSI). Evidence suggests that purse-string skin closure (PSSC) may achieve both objectives. This study aims to compare conventional primary closure (PC) with PSSC to determine the efficacious technique for stoma wound closure.

METHODS

Patients undergoing stoma reversal between April 2015 and September 2017 were prospectively studied. Patients were divided into two groups based on the technique of skin closure (PC or PSSC). The following parameters were assessed: SSI, hospital stay, additional outpatient visit, wound healing time and patient satisfaction based on a standardised questionnaire.

RESULTS

Forty one patients underwent stoma reversal (20 PSSC vs 21 PC). Wound infection, need for wound care, length of hospital stay, healing time and scar size were significantly less, whereas average patient wound satisfaction scores were significantly more in the PSSC group.

CONCLUSION

Purse-string skin closure (PSSC) proves efficacious and hence merits adoption as the technique of choice for closure of stoma wounds.

Evaluation of Cholestyramine 15% Ointment in Relieving Pruritus and Burning After Ileostomy: A Rrandomized, Double-Blind Placebo-Controlled Clinical Trial

Purpose/Aims: Skin irritation is a common ileostomy problem that causes burning and pruritus among patients due to the leakage of intestinal discharge around the stoma. This clinical trial was performed to evaluate the efficacy of topical cholestyramine (15%) on the reduction of the levels of burning and pruritus after an ileostomy. Material and methods: The patients were randomly divided into two groups of treatment and control (n = 15). The intervention group was subjected to one fingertip of cholestyramine, whereas the other group received the placebo ointment (approximately 0.5 g) on the skin immediately after the surgery and twice a day for 2 months. The primary outcome measure was the severity of burning and pruritus measured by a visual analog scale at different times after an ileostomy. Results: Out of 34 patients, four cases were excluded due to the inappropriate completion of the questionnaire (n = 2) and unwillingness to attend the follow-up visits (n = 2). Therefore, 30 patients were included in the study. The levels of burning among patients in the cholestyramine were lower in weeks 3, 4, and 8 compared to the placebo group. Moreover, lower levels of pruritus were observed among patients in the treatment group in weeks 4 and 8 after an ileostomy. No side effects were reported among the patients. Conclusions: Topical cholestyramine was found to be effective in the management of burning and pruritus resulting from an ileostomy among the population under study.

An unusual cause for small bowel obstruction as a complication of an ileostomy formation

Ileostomy formation is a fundamental component in the surgical management of many gastrointestinal diseases and like all intra-abdominal surgeries, small bowel obstruction is a recognized complication. In this paper we discuss a case of a 44-year-old female who previously had a loop ileostomy for slow bowel transit in the presence of spinal bifida. She presented for subsequent total colectomy because of ongoing pain due to chronic colonic dilation. At surgery, the stoma was not revised and the efferent loop was divided at the peritoneal level of the anterior abdominal wall. Six days postoperatively, the patient developed a small bowel obstruction as a result of the remnant efferent loop within the anterior abdominal wall, forming a cystic mass compressing the ileostomy, requiring surgical intervention. As far as we are aware, this is the first case of small bowel obstruction described due to this unusual etiology.

Outcome and Cost Analysis of Hand-Sewn and Stapled Anastomoses in the Reversal of Loop Ileostomy

Diverting loop ileostomies are common procedures for protecting high-risk anastomoses. There is little consensus on the most ideal technique both in terms of cost efficiency and outcome. Data for this study were collected from 101 patients who underwent loop ileostomy reversal between 2009 and 2014 at Morristown Medical Center. Of the 101 patients included in the review, 57 received a hand-sewn anastomosis (HS-A) and 44 received a stapled anastomosis (S-A). Average total hospital charges for stapled anastomoses were significantly greater than that for hand-sewn anastomoses, as were total operating room supply costs. When the total cost of the operation itself was considered, S-A cases were still found to be significantly greater than HS-A cases. Hospital room charges, total lab charges, pathology charges, and EKG/ECG charges were all greater for S-A cases than HS-A cases. Overall costs were greater for S-As than hand-sewn anastomoses and because of a lack of difference in procedure length, stapler supply costs were not offset. Complication rates and length of stay were also similar between the techniques. We found S-A cases to be more costly and have a greater cost/hour than HS-A cases.

Prospective analysis of indications and early complications of emergency temporary loop ileostomies for perforation peritonitis

Background

To determine the indications, nature, and rate of early complications of temporary loop ileostomy created in emergency for benign diseases, their management, and to find out the associated risk factors.

Methods

A total of 630 patients undergoing temporary loop ileostomy for benign diseases were studied prospectively over a period of 6 years. Stoma-related early complications occurring within 6-8 weeks were analyzed. Only emergency cases were included in this study. Descriptive statistics were used to summarize the data and statistical significance was evaluated by applying the Pearson’s chi-square test.

Results

Typhoid perforation (n=402) was the most commonpathology, followed by tuberculosis (n=106); trauma (n=81); and intestinal obstruction with gangrenous bowel (n=41). 299 patients had no stoma-related complications. Skin excoriation was the most commonstoma-related complication. Age more than 50 years; shock at presentation; delay in presentation; delay in surgery; presence of comorbidities; and surgery done out of working hours, were associated with increased complications.

Conclusion

Temporary loop ileostomy for perforation peritonitis due to benign systemic diseases like typhoid fever and tuberculosis confers a very high morbidity.

Morbidity of loop ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Temporary loop ileostomy is a routine procedure to reduce the morbidity of restorative proctocolectomy. However, morbidity of ileostomy closure could reduce the benefit of this concept. The objective of this systematic review was to assess the risks of ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy for ulcerative colitis or familial adenomatous polyposis.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Publications in English or German language reporting morbidity of ileostomy closure after restorative proctocolectomy were identified by Medline search. Two hundred thirty-two publications were screened, 143 were assessed in full-text, and finally 26 studies (reporting 2146 ileostomy closures) fulfilled the eligibility criteria. Weighted means for overall morbidity and mortality of ileostomy closure, rate of redo operations, anastomotic dehiscence, bowel obstruction, wound infection, and late complications were calculated.

RESULTS

Overall morbidity of ileostomy closure was 16.5 %, there was no mortality. Redo operations for complications were necessary in 3.0 %. Anastomotic dehiscence occurred in 2.0 %. Postoperative bowel obstruction developed in 7.6 %, with 2.9 % of patients requiring laparotomy for this complication. Wound infection rate was 4.0 %. Hernia or bowel obstruction as late complications developed in 1.9 and 9.4 %, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The considerable morbidity of ileostomy reversal reduces the overall benefit of temporary fecal diversion. However, ileostomy creation is still recommended, as it effectively reduces the risk of pouch-related septic complications.

Pursestring closure of the stoma site leads to fewer wound infections: results from a multicenter randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND

Surgical site infection after stoma reversal is common. The optimal skin closure technique after stoma reversal has been widely debated in the literature.

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that pursestring near-complete closure of the stoma site would lead to fewer surgical site infections compared with conventional primary closure.

DESIGN

This study was a parallel prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial.

SETTINGS

This study was conducted at 2 university medical centers.

PATIENTS

Patients (N = 122) presenting for elective colostomy or ileostomy reversal were selected.

INTERVENTIONS

Pursestring versus conventional primary closure of stoma sites were compared.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Stoma site surgical site infection within 30 days of surgery, overall surgical site infection, delayed healing (open wound for >30 days), time to wound epithelialization, and patient satisfaction were the primary outcomes measured.

RESULTS

The pursestring group had a significantly lower stoma site infection rate (2% vs 15%, p = 0.01). There was no difference in delayed healing or patient satisfaction between groups. Time to epithelialization was measured in only 51 patients but was significantly longer in the pursestring group (34.6 ± 20 days vs 24.1 ± 17 days, p = 0.02).

LIMITATIONS

This study was limited by the variability in procedures and surgeons, the limited follow-up after 30 days, and the inability to perform blinding.

CONCLUSION

Pursestring closure after stoma reversal has a lower risk of stoma site surgical site infection than conventional primary closure, although wounds may take longer to heal with the use of this approach.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT01713452 (www.clinicaltrials.gov).

A temporary loop ileostomy affects renal function

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate renal morbidity after a temporary loop ileostomy and to identify possible preoperative risk factors.

METHOD

Consecutive patients at four hospitals serving 1,520,000 inhabitants who received a temporary loop ileostomy and underwent subsequent closure were identified and retrospectively studied from 1 January 2007 until 28 February 2010. Serum creatinine levels were obtained 1 week before index surgery and 1 week before closure of the loop ileostomy. Estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was calculated using the CKD-EPI formula.

RESULTS

Three hundred eight patients with median age of 64 were identified. The indication for the loop ileostomy was colorectal cancer (226), inflammatory bowel disease (41), diverticulosis (8), and other conditions (33). Median time until closure was 161 days (3-873). There was a decrease in eGFR at time of closure (89 vs. 83; p < 0.0001), and the number of patients with renal impairment (eGFR <60) increased (7.5 vs. 21 %, p < 0.0001). Preoperative risk factors for eGFR <60 at closure were age and hypertension.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that a loop ileostomy is associated with a reduced renal function for most patients, especially for older and hypertensive patients. This should be considered before constructing a loop ileostomy, and perhaps another stoma should be chosen if possible in patients at risk. Evaluation of medications before discharge and early and frequent postoperative follow-up could also reduce the risk of a reduced renal function.

Meta-analysis of handsewn versus stapled reversal of loop ileostomy

BACKGROUND

The morbidity associated with closure of loop ileostomy (LI) may be attributed to the various surgical techniques employed for the closure. The purpose of this review was to review the hand-sutured (HS) versus the stapled anastomosis (SA) techniques, used in the reversal of LI.

METHODS

The MEDLINE, PubMed, CINHAL, Cochrane library and Web of Knowledge databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and case-control trials (CCTs), evaluating HS and SA in reversal of LI. Data extraction with risk of bias assessment was followed by subgroup and pooled data meta-analysis where applicable per outcome.

RESULTS

Four RCTs (HS: 321, SA: 328) and 10 CCTs (HS: 2808, SA: 1044) were identified, with a total of 4508 patients. Regardless of subgroup analysis, no difference was seen between the two techniques with regard to anastomotic leaks (P = 0.24, odds ratio (OR): 1.37, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.81-2.29) or re-operation. The stapled group showed a significantly lower rate of conservatively managed small bowel obstruction (SBO)/ ileus at 30 days (P < 0.001, OR: 2.27, 95% CI: 1.59-2.96) (P < 0.001) and SBO during combined short- and long-term follow-up (P < 0.001). The SA also showed significant shorter operative time (P = 0.02; WMD 11.52 min), time to first bowel opening (P < 0.001; WMD 0.52 days) and length of hospital stay (P = 0.03; WMD 0.70 days).

CONCLUSION

The stapled technique offers an advantage in terms of lower post-operative subacute SBO rates, a faster operative technique and shorter hospitalization times. These perceived benefits make it potentially superior to HS for the reversal of LI.

Stapled vs hand suture closure of loop ileostomy: a meta-analysis

AIM

Loop ileostomies are widely used in colorectal surgery to reduce the consequences of distal anastomotic failure. The optimal surgical technique for their closure has yet not been defined. A meta-analysis was performed to compare the outcome after stapled or hand sutured ileostomy closure.

METHOD

An electronic literature search of EMBASE, PubMed and the Cochrane Library was undertaken to identify studies reporting stapled and hand sutured ileostomy closure. End-points included postoperative small bowel obstruction (SBO), anastomotic leakage, wound infection, overall postoperative complications, operation time, hospital stay and surgery-related cost.

RESULTS

Fourteen studies including 5084 patients were identified. Meta-analysis showed that stapled closure was associated with a lower rate of SBO overall (OR = 0.56, P < 0.00001) and early (within 30 days of closure) SBO (OR = 0.51, P < 0.00001). This difference persisted for direct ileostomy closure (OR = 0.62, P = 0.02) or closure with bowel resection and hand sewn anastomosis (OR = 0.44, P < 0.00001). Stapled closure required a shorter inpatient stay (mean difference -1.22, P < 0.0001) and operating time (mean difference -11.21, P = 0.01). No significant difference was noted between the two techniques in terms of anastomotic leakage, wound infection, overall complications or cost.

CONCLUSION

Stapled side-to-side anastomosis is associated with fewer complications, especially SBO, than hand sewn ileostomy closure by direct suture or resection and anastomosis. It is quicker to perform and associated with fewer postoperative bowel obstructions.

Comparison between Tube Ileostomy and Loop Ileostomy as a Diversion Procedure

Aim. Loop ileostomy has high complication rates and causes much patient inconvenience. This study was performed to compare the outcome of tube versus loop ileostomy in management of ileal perforations. Patients and Methods. From July 2008 to July 2011, all patients with ileal perforation on laparotomy where a defunctioning proximal protective loop ileostomy was considered advisable were chosen for study. Patients were randomly assigned to undergo either tube ileostomy or classical loop ileostomy as the diversion procedure. Tube ileostomy was constructed in the fashion of feeding jejunostomy, with postoperative saline irrigation. Results. A total of 60 diversion procedures were performed over the period with 30 for each of tube and loop ileostomy. Typhoid and tuberculosis formed the most common etiology for ileal perforation. The complication rate of tube ileostomy was 33%. Main complications related to tube ileostomy were peritubal leak, tube blockage. In patients with loop, overall complications in 53% majority were peristomal skin irritation and wound infection following ileostomy closure. Two patients developed obstruction following ileostomy closure which needed reoperation. Conclusions. Tube ileostomy is effective and feasible as a diversion procedure and has reduced morbidity. It can be used as an alternative to loop ileostomy.

Feasibility of laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy without diverting stoma

AIM

Restorative proctocolectomy performed before the advent of laparoscopy had evolved to frequently omit a diverting stoma. Our aim was to assess the impact of a diverting stoma on postoperative outcomes following laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy.

METHOD

Data on all patients undergoing a laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy at our institution were prospectively collated in a database.

RESULTS

Between November 2004 and February 2010, 71 patients (38 females) underwent laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy. Indications included familial adenomatous polyposis (n=34), ulcerative colitis (n=35), indeterminate colitis (n=1) and Lynch syndrome (n=1). Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy was performed as a one-stage procedure in 49 patients, and after a sub-total colectomy in 22. Seven patients in each group underwent the formation of a diverting stoma. Nine patients required conversion to open surgery. Sixteen patients experienced at least one postoperative complication. The postoperative morbidity was 29% (n=4/14) and 21% (n=12/21) in patients with and without a stoma (p=0.8), and the rate of fistula was 21% and 5%, respectively (p=0.08). Seven percent of patients with a stoma and 16% without stoma had an intra-abdominal collection (p=0.7). Nine patients required reoperation. The reoperation rate was not influenced by the presence or absence of a diverting stoma.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic restorative proctocolectomy can be performed safely without a diverting stoma in selected patients.

Postoperative complications after closure of a diverting ileostoma--differences according to closure technique

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to compare three methods for closure of a diverting ileostoma according to development of postoperative small-bowel obstruction (SBO) and anastomotic leakage (AL).

METHODS

Complications arising within 30 days after closure of a defunctioning loop ileostomy in 351 patients during the period 1999-2006 were studied retrospectively by evaluation of case records. The techniques employed were: hand-sewn anastomosis without bowel resection, hand-sewn anastomosis with bowel resection and stapled anastomosis.

RESULTS

Of the 351 patients, 149 had a hand-sewn anastomosis without bowel resection (HS), 70 had a hand-sewn anastomosis with bowel resection (HSR) and 132 patients had a stapled anastomosis (S). The total number of SBOs was 44 patients (12.5%). In the two hand-sewn groups, 15.5% (34 patients) suffered postoperative SBO compared to 7.6% (10 patients) in the stapled group (p = 0.029). No difference in AL could be found between the groups, where the overall frequency was 2.8% (10 patients). Median hospital stay was 6 days in the HS group, 5 days in the HSR group and 4 days in the S group (p = 0.001).

CONCLUSION

In the present study, stapled anastomosis was associated with a lower frequency of postoperative SBO and a shorter hospital stay compared to sutured anastomosis (either with or without a short small-bowel resection) after closure of a diverting ileostoma.

Renal impairment caused by temporary loop ileostomy

PURPOSE

Creation of a temporary loop ileostomy is a standard surgical procedure. This study was undertaken to determine whether dehydration associated with the ileostomy causes renal impairment.

METHODS

The prospective data from 107 consecutive patients undergoing temporary loop ileostomy between 2004 and 2009 was evaluated. GFR was calculated at the time of hospital discharge after constructing the ileostomy and at the time of deciding to close the ileostomy.

RESULTS

The average GFR at the time of discharge after constructing the ileostomy was a median of 92.50 (60.75-223.88); at the time of deciding to close the ileostomy, it was 75.25 (4-135.13) ml/min/1.73 m(2) (p < 0.001). In 20 patients renal function decreased, with a GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m(2) during the ileostomy period; in six of these 20 patients, the decrease was severe (GFR <30 ml/min/1.73 m(2)). Underlying diseases, reasons for constructing ileostomies, sex, and time interval to closure did not affect renal function. Patients in whom GFR was decreased at the time of deciding to close the ileostomy presented with significantly more closure-related surgical complications.

CONCLUSIONS

Renal impairment is a well-known potential complication of loop ileostomy. To avoid this complication, close control and backup support is recommended in these patients.

Revisiting stapled and handsewn loop ileostomy closures: a large retrospective series

OBJECTIVE

To compare the surgical outcomes of stapled and handsewn closures in loop ileostomies.

METHODS

The data of 225 patients requiring loop ileostomies from 2002 to 2007 were retrospectively evaluated. The patients underwent partial small-bowel resections and either handsewn or stapled anastomoses for the ileostomy closures. They were followed up postoperatively with routine surgical examinations.

RESULTS

The study group consisted of 124 men and 101 women with a mean age of 49.12 years. The ileostomy closure was performed with handsewn in 129 patients and with stapled in 96 patients. The mean time to the first postoperative flatus was 2.426 days in the handsewn group and 2.052 days in the stapled group (p <0.05). The mean time to the first postoperative defecation was 3.202 days in the handsewn group and 2.667 days in the stapled group (p <0.05). The mean duration of patient hospital stay was 8.581 days for the handsewn group and 6.063 days for the stapled group (p <0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Patients who underwent ileostomy closure with stapled recovered faster in the postoperative period and required shorter hospital stays than those whose closures were performed with handsewn. In our opinion, stapled should be considered the gold standard for loop ileostomy closures.

Feasibility and outcome of proximal catheter ileostomy - a pilot study

BACKGROUND/AIM

Loop ileostomy has high complication rates and causes much patient inconvenience. This study was carried out to evaluate the feasibility and outcome of a proximal catheter ileostomy in place of loop ileostomy in patients treated by intestinal repair and/or resection-anastomosis.

DESIGN

Prospective study.

SETTING

J. N. Medical College Hospital, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, India.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From November 2006 to November 2009, in all patients treated surgically by primary repair and/or resection-anastomosis of small and/or large bowel, we constructed a catheter ileostomy when a defunctioning proximal protective loop ileostomy was considered advisable. Catheter ileostomy was constructed in the fashion of catheter jejunostomy, with postoperative saline irrigation.

RESULTS

Catheter ileostomy was performed in 20 patients in the 3-year period. The mean age of the subjects was 28.6 years and the male: female ratio was 1.86:1. Four patients died of septicemia and multiple organ failure unrelated to catheter ileostomy in the immediate postoperative period. Catheter ileostomy started functioning within 48 hours of the operation, and twice-daily irrigation was found sufficient in 81.25% of the surviving patients. Only one patient developed peritubal leak with mild skin excoriation that cleared within 5 days. Another patient with Koch's abdomen underwent conversion to loop colostomy on re-exploration for postoperative adhesive obstruction. There was no instance of intestinal leak. Ileostomy wounds closed spontaneously within 7-14 days of catheter removal, and none required formal closure. Hospital stay ranged from 12-35 days (mean: 23 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Catheter ileostomy is effective in protecting intestinal anastomosis/repair; there is minimal morbidity and no catheter-related leak/mortality, and we recommend the procedure.

Closure of Loop Ileostomies: Is Early Discharge Safe and Achievable?

A prospective audit of the complications associated with reversal of a loop ileostomy was carried out between March 2000 and March 2005. The complication rate, length of inpatient hospitalisation and re-admission rate were assessed in 100 patients, in a single clinical practice. The median (interquartile range) length of time between the primary procedure and closure was 133 days (120 – 270) days. Median length of inpatient stay was two days (one - three) days. The overall complication rate was 18 %. One patient had a post-operative leak leading to local abscess formation. This was drained surgically after initial failure with radiological drainage. A second patient had a late leak, three weeks after closure, leading to fistula formation. This patient required surgical resection of the anastomosis after failure of conservative management. Twelve patients were re-admitted with small bowel obstruction (12%), of whom 11 were managed conservatively, while one underwent further surgery. There was one post- operative death as a result of acute cardiac failure secondary to undiagnosed hypertensive cardiomyopathy.

Thus early discharge following closure of a loop ileostomy, can be achieved with an acceptably low serious complication rate.

Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis. Systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The controversy regarding whether loop ileostomy or loop transverse colostomy is a better method for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis motivated this review.

METHODS

Five randomized trials were included, with 334 patients: 168 in the loop ileostomy group and 166 in the loop transverse colostomy group. The outcomes analyzed were: 1. Mortality; 2. Wound infection; 3. Time of stoma formation; 4. Time of stoma closure; 5. Time interval between stoma formation and closure; 6. Stoma prolapse; 7. Stoma retraction; 8. Parastomal hernia; 9. Parastomal fistula; 10. Stenosis; 11. Necrosis; 12. Skin irritation; 13. Ileus; 14. Bowel leakage; 15. Reoperation; 16. Patient adaptation; 17. Length of hospital stay; 18. Colorectal anastomotic dehiscence; 19. Incisional hernia; 20. Postoperative bowel obstruction.

RESULTS

Stoma prolapse was statistically significant (p = 0.00001), but with statistical heterogeneity; the sensitive analysis was applied, excluding the trials that included emergency surgery, and this showed: p = 0.02, with I2 = 0% for the heterogeneity test.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcomes reported were not statistically or clinically significant except for stoma prolapse. Better evidence for making the choice between loop ileostomy or loop colostomy requires large-scale randomized controlled trials.

The morbidity surrounding reversal of defunctioning ileostomies: a systematic review of 48 studies including 6,107 cases

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Loop ileostomies are used currently in surgical practice to reduce the consequences of distal anastomotic failure following colorectal resection. It is often assumed that reversal of a loop ileostomy is a simple and safe procedure. However, many studies have demonstrated high morbidity rates following loop ileostomy closure. The aims of this systematic review were to examine all the existing evidence in the literature on morbidity and mortality following closure of loop ileostomy.

METHOD

A literature search of Ovid, Embase, the Cochrane database, Google Scholar and Medline using Pubmed as the search engine was used to identify studies reporting on the morbidity of loop ileostomy closure (latest at June 15th 2008), was performed. Outcomes of interest included demographics, the details regarding the original indication for operation, operative and hospital-related outcomes, post-operative bowel-related complications, and other surgical and medical complications.

RESULTS

Forty-eight studies from 18 countries satisfied the inclusion criteria. Outcomes of a total of 6,107 patients were analysed. Overall morbidity following closure of loop ileostomy was found to be 17.3% with a mortality rate of 0.4%. 3.7% of patients required a laparotomy at the time of ileostomy closure. The most common post-operative complications included small bowel obstruction (7.2%) and wound sepsis (5.0%).

CONCLUSION

The consequences of anastomotic leakage following colorectal resection are severe. However, the consequences of stoma reversal are often underestimated. Surgeons should adopt a selective strategy regarding the use of defunctioning ileostomy, and counsel patients further prior to the original surgery. In this way, patients at low risk may be spared the morbidity of stoma reversal.

Complications of loop ileostomy closure: a retrospective cohort analysis of 123 patients

BACKGROUND

Loop ileostomies are often formed in order to defunction distal anastomoses. The aim of this study was to review the complications following closure of loop ileostomies.

METHODS

This is a retrospective case note analysis of all loop ileostomy closures performed in the Northumbria Healthcare NHS Trust (population over 500,000) over a 5-year period between 2001 and 2005.

RESULTS

A total of 123 case records were reviewed. Complications occurred in 41 patients (33.3%), with 9 patients (7.3%) requiring further intervention. There were 4 (3.3%) postoperative deaths. Complications were more common in patients with increased comorbidity (p = 0.0007) and postoperative death was more frequent among the elderly (p = 0.0006). Postoperative death was more common in those patients who had their stomas created during surgery (elective or emergency) for diverticular disease (3 patients, p = 0.006). Patients with diverticular disease had significantly higher comorbidity and peritoneal contamination at the time of primary surgery. Ileostomy reversal after anterior resection for cancer was associated with a lower complication rate than the rest of the cohort (26%, p = 0.0003) but there was no significant difference in mortality. Neither the grade of the surgeon, the case volume, or the anastomotic technique affected postoperative morbidity. Reoperation was more common in patients whose closure procedure took less time (p = 0.002) and in those who had a shorter wait from creation to reversal of the stoma (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Reversal of loop ileostomy may be associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Increasing the delay from creation to closure may result in fewer complications.There is an increased risk in older patients with more comorbidity, particularly when the primary procedure is for diverticular disease with significant peritoneal contamination.

Comparison of stapled versus handsewn loop ileostomy closure: a meta-analysis

The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of small bowel obstruction, anastomotic complications, and wound infections between stapled and handsewn closures of loop ileostomies. A literature search in Embase, PubMed, and Cochrane Database for Clinical Trials using search terms "closure," "loop ileostomy," and "stapled" was performed. All abstracts were reviewed to identify relevant articles, and their references were hand searched for additional studies. Six articles were identified for inclusion. Three independent reviewers extracted the following data: rates of small bowel obstruction, anastomotic complications, wound infection; length of hospital stay; and operative time. Data analysis was performed using Stata statistical software. Comparing stapled versus hand-sewn closures, there were no statistically significant differences in bowel obstruction (relative risk [RR] 0.69, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44 to 1.09), wound infection (RR 0.91, 95% CI 0.53 to 1.97), or anastomotic complication rates (RR 1.01, 95% CI 0.99 to 1.03). Two studies showed shorter operative times favoring stapled anastomoses. No difference was seen in length of stay. Current literature suggests no statistically significant differences between stapled and hand-sewn loop ileostomy closures, but there may be a trend favoring stapled closures with regard to lower small bowel obstruction rates and shorter operative time.

Early stomal complications

The creation of intestinal stomas for diversion of enteric contents is an important component of the surgical management of several gastroenterologic disease processes. Despite the frequency with which these procedures are performed, complications of stoma creation remain common, despite extensive measures aimed at reducing them. Early postoperative complications (those seen less than one month postoperatively) can lead to significant cost, both financially and psychologically, and incur significant morbidity. Commonly seen early postoperative stomal complications include improper stoma site selection, vascular compromise, retraction, peristomal skin irritation, peristomal infection/abscess/fistula, acute parastomal herniation and bowel obstruction, and pure technical errors. The author reviews these early complications associated with stoma creation, discusses means of preventing them, and outlines the management strategy for such complications when they do occur.

Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

Since 1977, restorative proctocolectomy with ileoanal anastomosis (IAA) has evolved into the surgical treatment of choice for most patients with intractable ulcerative colitis. Construction of an ileal pouch reservoir is now standard, usually in the form of J pouch (IPAA). The aim of this report is to review selection criteria for, and functional outcomes, follow-up and management of complications of IPAA after 30 years of widespread clinical application.

METHODS AND RESULTS

Literature published in English on the clinical indications, surgical technique, morbidity, complications and outcome following IAA and IPAA was sourced by electronic search, performed independently by two reviewers who selected potentially relevant papers based on title and abstract. Additional articles were identified by cross-referencing from papers retrieved in the initial search.

CONCLUSION

The functional results of IPAA are good. Pouchitis, irritable pouch syndrome and cuffitis are specific long-term complications but rarely result in failure. Pouch salvage is possible in selected patients with poor functional outcomes. One-stage operations are increasingly performed.

Ileostomy or colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis

BACKGROUND

The use of loop ileostomy or loop transverse colostomy represents an important issue in colorectal surgery. Despite a slight preference for a loop ileostomy as a temporary stoma, the best form for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis still remains controversial.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the evidence in the use of loop ileostomy compared with loop transverse colostomy for temporary decompression of colorectal anastomosis, comparing the safety and effectiveness.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We identified randomised controlled trials from MEDLINE, EMBASE, Lilacs, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials. Further, by hand-searching relevant medical journals and proceedings from major gastroenterological congresses. We did not limit the seaches regarding date and language.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We assessed all randomised clinical trials, that met the objectives and reported major outcomes: 1. Mortality; 2. Wound infection; 3. Time of formation of stoma; 4. Time of closure of stoma; 5. Time interval between formation and closure of stoma; 6. Stoma prolapse; 7. Stoma retraction; 8. Parastomal hernia; 9. Parastomal fistula; 10. Stenosis; 11. Necrosis; 12. Skin irritation; 13. Ileus; 14. Bowel leakage; 15. Reoperation; 16. Patient adaptation; 17. Length of hospital stay; 18. Colorectal anastomotic dehiscence; 19. Incisional hernia; 20. Postoperative bowel obstruction.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Details of the randomisation, blinding, whether an intention-to-treat analysis was done, and the number of patients lost to follow-up was recorded. For data analysis the relative risk and risk difference were used with corresponding 95% confidence interval; fixed effect was used for all outcomes unless incisional hernia (random effect model). Statistical heterogeneity in the results of the meta-analysis was assessed by inspection of graphical presentation (funnel plot) and by calculating a test of heterogeneity.

MAIN RESULTS

Five trials were included with 334 patients: 168 to loop ileostomy group and 166 to loop transverse colostomy group. The continuous outcomes could not be measured because of the lack of the data. The outcomes stoma prolapse had statistical significant difference: p=0.00001, but with statistical heterogeneity, p=0,001. When the sensitive analysis was applied excluding the trials that included emergencies surgeries, the result had a discreet difference: p = 0.02 and Test for heterogeneity: chi-square = 0.78, df = 2, p = 0.68, I(2)=0%.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

The best available evidence for decompression of colorectal anastomosis, either use of loop ileostomy or loop colostomy, could not be clarified from this review. So far, the results in terms of occurrence of postoperative stoma prolapse support the choice of loop ileostomy as a technique for fecal diversion for colorectal anastomosis, but large scale RCT's is needed to verify this.

Difficulties Experienced by the Ostomate After Hospital Discharge

PURPOSE

This descriptive study used a mailed survey to identify difficulties related to the stoma that ostomates experience after discharge from the hospital, who they sought help from, and if the advice was perceived as helpful.

SUBJECTS AND SETTING

Ostomates who are 18 years or older and have undergone a urinary or fecal diversion at a North Carolina hospital between January 1, 2003 and June 30, 2005, were asked to respond to a survey about the difficulties related to their ostomy.

INSTRUMENT

The survey gathered demographic and anthropometric data, information regarding stomal complications, self-evaluation of emotional state, and contact with clinicians and support groups.

RESULTS

Of the 140 surveys mailed, 43 were returned, demonstrating a return rate of 31%. Thirty-four returned surveys were useable for statistical analysis. The top 5 difficulties experienced by the respondents were peristomal skin irritation (76%), pouch leakage (62%), odor (59%), reduction in previously enjoyed activities (54%), and depression/anxiety (53%). Twenty percent of the ostomates who experienced difficulties after surgery did not seek help. Ostomates primarily sought help from nurses when they experienced problems related to the stoma and its maintenance. For mental health, sleep, and sexual problems, a medical doctor was the practitioner of choice. Ostomates were satisfied with most of the help they received from an ostomy nurse; satisfaction was lower for home health nurses and surgeon or primary care physician practices. Average wear time for a stoma pouch was 4 days.

CONCLUSION

The majority of the ostomates experienced difficulty with pouch leakage, skin irritation, odor, depression or anxiety, and uneven pouching surfaces. Ostomates desire assistance with these problems and will benefit from long-term follow-up by an ostomy nurse.

Santulli enterostomy revisited: indications in adults

BACKGROUND

Surgical patients frequently need some type of intestinal stomas for a wide spectrum of disorders. Maintaining effective and enough decompression of gastrointestinal tract, securing distal bowel segments and anastomosis are the primary goals of ostomy formation as well as providing a minimum complication rate of closure or "take-down".

METHOD

In this report, we present five adult patients who were operated for some kind of intestinal disease and required enterostomy. We preferred Santulli type of enterostomy which was formerly used by pediatric surgeons. In this technique, the proximal afferent bowel is fashioned into a stoma and anastomosed side-to-end with double layer sutures into the distal efferent bowel.

RESULT

One of the five patients died of systemic problems, other four did well in terms of surgical outcome of the stoma.

CONCLUSION

We concluded that; although indications are limited, Santulli enterostomy can be performed in adult patients as effective as pediatric age group, particularly for its advantages in early restoration of intestinal continuity and diminished risk for post-closure complications.

Clinical utility of a de-functioning loop ileostomy

BACKGROUND

The de-functioning loop ileostomy was introduced as a technique to create a manageable stoma that would divert the faecal stream from a more distal anastomosis in order to reduce the consequences of any anastomotic leakage. The value of de-functioning stomas is currently being challenged. The purpose of the present study was to review the clinical utility of performing a de-functioning loop ileostomy in patients undergoing colorectal surgery.

METHODS

A review was undertaken of a prospective colorectal database maintained at Fremantle Hospital. All end-points were defined prior to the collection of data. The study reviewed the indications and type of surgery performed. The main end-points included (i) the prevalence and management of anastomotic leaks at the primary surgery; (ii) unplanned readmissions prior to stoma closure; and (iii) the mortality, reoperation rate, and morbidity associated with closure of the stoma.

RESULTS

The study involved 233 patients of mean age 58 years (range 15-89 years) and a male:female ratio of 1.1:1. The majority of patients were undergoing elective surgery (82%) for colorectal neoplasia (71%). The commonest surgical procedure was an ultra-low anterior resection (62%). At the initial surgery, 16 patients (7.0%) developed anastomotic leaks, but only two (0.9%) required reoperation. Eleven patients (4.8%) required 12 unplanned readmissions prior to stoma closure. At closure (n = 230), there were no postoperative deaths, one patient developed an ileal anastomotic leak that was managed with antibiotics, and five patients (2.2%) required reoperation within 30 days of surgery.

CONCLUSION

De-functioning loop ileostomy was found to be associated with a relatively low morbidity and no mortality.

Short-term outcome of loop ileostomy closure under local anesthesia: results of a feasibility study

BACKGROUND

Loop ileostomy is an established technique for temporary deviation of bowel contents to avoid clinical anastomotic leakage, fistulas, or use of an inflamed colon. Anesthetic risks and postoperative complications of the closure operation result in a significant proportion of ileostomies that are never closed, factors that should be borne in mind when fashioning temporary stomas. We investigated loop ileostomy closure under local anesthesia as a way to avoid these problems.

METHODS

As a feasibility study, 15 successive patients underwent closure of a loop ileostomy under local anesthesia. The patients' experience of the procedure, postoperative pain, analgesia requirements, and oral intake were prospectively evaluated.

RESULTS

Procedures could be comfortably completed under safe doses of local anesthesia. Use of standard nasogastric tubes was avoided and immediately postoperatively patients were able to resume a full oral diet. Discharge was on the second postoperative day (median). Complications were paralytic ileus for two days (1 patient), anastomotic leakage (1 patient), and superficial wound infection (1 patient).

CONCLUSION

Reversal of loop ileostomy can be performed safely and comfortably under local anesthesia. Postoperative results compare favorably with those of routine procedures.

Small bowel obstruction following low anterior resection: the impact of diversion ileostomy

BACKGROUND

The incidence of small bowel obstruction following rectal cancer surgery has not been well documented in the era of sphincter-preserving surgery. This report aimed to study the incidence, aetiologies and outcomes of small bowel obstruction in patients after low anterior resection for rectal cancer. The factors that might affect the incidences of small bowel obstruction were analysed.

METHODS

Consecutive patients who had undergone low anterior resection for rectal cancer from August 1993 to March 1999 were studied. Patients with unplanned admissions, with the diagnosis of small bowel obstruction, were reviewed. The aetiologies and outcome of small bowel obstruction were documented.

RESULTS

Two hundred and fourteen patients were included, with a median follow-up time of 39 months; 22 patients presented with 30 episodes of small bowel obstruction, and operations were necessary in nine patients (40.9%). Malignant obstruction occurred in two patients (10.3%). Obstruction within 6 weeks of surgery (including closure of stoma) occurred in 13 patients (6.1%). Early obstruction occurred at a higher incidence in those patients who had had an ileostomy than in those who did not (9.1% vs 2.9%, P=0.048).

CONCLUSION

Small bowel obstruction following rectal cancer surgery occurred in 10.3% of patients. The majority of the obstruction was benign in nature. The presence of diversion ileostomy was associated with an increased incidence of early obstruction, and the use of loop ileostomy for proximal diversion should be further assessed.

Safety of the temporary loop ileostomy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the complications of the temporary loop ileostomy. METHOD: A retrospective study of 222 consecutive patients with low anterior resection, ileal pouch-anal anastomosis or continent ileostomy and a diverting loop ileostomy routinely fashioned during the primary operation. The loop ileostomy was closed in 213 patients (96%) during the minimum follow-up period of 15 months. RESULTS: Four patients (2%) required preterm closure of the ostomy due to stomal retraction (n = 3) or bowel obstruction (n = 1). Four patients were readmitted due to transient bowel obstruction that resolved without surgery. After closure of the loop ileostomy a total of 27 patients (13%) had complications. In 7 patients emergency re-operation was done due to small bowel obstruction (n = 5) or intra-abdominal abscess (n = 2). Elective re-operation was done in 5 patients for hernia at the site of the previous stoma. Despite the use of a loop ileostomy there was 1 postoperative death after the initial operation in consequence of anastomotic leakage. There was 1 death in consequence of closure of the loop ileostomy after 3 weeks due to intra-abdominal sepsis and heart failure. CONCLUSION: In this series closure of the ostomy wasassociated with one death (0.5%) and overall ostomy-related morbidity included the need to re-operate in 6%.

Randomized clinical trial comparing loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy for faecal diversion following total mesorectal excision

BACKGROUND

The aim of this study was to compare loop ileostomy and loop transverse colostomy as the preferred mode of faecal diversion following low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer.

METHODS

Patients who required proximal diversion after low anterior resection with total mesorectal excision were randomized to have either a loop ileostomy or a loop transverse colostomy. Postoperative morbidity, stoma-related problems and morbidity following closure were compared.

RESULTS

From April 1999 to November 2000, 42 patients had a loop ileostomy and 38 had a loop transverse colostomy constructed following low anterior resection. Postoperative intestinal obstruction and prolonged ileus occurred more commonly in patients with an ileostomy (P = 0.037). There was no difference in time to resumption of diet, length of hospital stay following stoma closure and incidence of stoma-related complications after discharge from hospital. A total of seven patients had intestinal obstruction from the time of stoma creation to stoma closure (six following ileostomy and one following colostomy; P = 0.01).

CONCLUSION

Intestinal obstruction and ileus are more common after loop ileostomy than loop colostomy. Loop transverse colostomy should be recommended as the preferred method of proximal faecal diversion.

Ileal pouch anal anastomosis without ileal diversion

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate continued experience with a one-stage stapled ileoanal pouch procedure without temporary ileostomy diversion.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Most centers perform colectomy, proctectomy, and ileal pouch anal anastomoses (IPAA) with a protective ileostomy. Following a previous report, the authors performed 126 additional stapled IPAA procedures for ulcerative colitis and familial adenomatous polyposis, of which all but 2 were without an ileostomy. Outcomes in these patients question the need for temporary ileal diversion, with its complications and need for subsequent surgical closure.

METHODS

Two hundred one patients underwent a stapled IPAA since May 1989, 192 as a one-stage procedure without ileostomy, and 1 with a concurrent Whipple procedure for duodenal adenocarcinoma. Patient charts were reviewed or patients were contacted by phone to evaluate their clinical status at least 1 year after their surgery.

RESULTS

Among the patients who underwent the one-stage procedure, 178 had ulcerative colitis (38 fulminant), 5 had Crohn's disease (diagnosed after IPAA), 1 had indeterminate colitis, and 8 had familial adenomatous polyposis. The mean age was 38 +/- 7 (range 7--70) years; there were 98 male patients and 94 female patients. The average amount of diseased tissue between the dentate line and the anastomosis was 0.9 +/- 0.1 cm, with 35% of the anastomoses at the dentate line. With 89% follow-up at 1 year or more (mean 5.1 +/- 2.4 years) after surgery, the average 24-hour stool frequency was 7.1 +/- 3.3, of which 0.9 +/- 1.4 were at night. Daytime stool control was 95% and night-time control was 90%. Only 2.3% needed to wear a perineal pad. Average length of hospital stay was 10 +/- 0.3 days, with 1.5 +/- 0.5 days readmission for complications. Abscesses or enteric leaks occurred in 23 patients; IPAA function was excellent in 19 of these patients (2 have permanent ileostomies). In patients taking steroids, there was no significant difference in leak rate with duration of use (29 +/- 8 with vs. 22 +/- 2 months without leak) or dose (32 +/- 13 mg with vs. 35 +/- 3 mg without leak). Two (1%) patients died (myocardial infarction, mesenteric infarction).

CONCLUSIONS

The triple-stapled IPAA without temporary ileal diversion has a relatively low complication rate and a low rate of small bowel obstruction, provides excellent fecal control, permits an early return to a functional life, and can be performed in morbidly obese and older patients.

Quality of life with a temporary stoma: ileostomy vs. colostomy

PURPOSE

The hypothesis is that the impact of a temporary stoma on a patient's daily life is determined by complications and related stoma care problems.

METHOD

A prospective clinical trial was performed, studying complications and social well-being of 37 patients with loop ileostomy and 39 patients with a loop colostomy (randomly assigned comparison). Patients were categorized according to degree of social restriction. The association between the degree of social restriction and the presence of stoma care problems and complications was assessed. Follow-up was scheduled every three months until the stoma was closed (94 percent).

RESULTS

There is no relation between stoma type (ileostomy or colostomy) and degree of social restriction (chi-squared test, P = 0.42). The more stoma care problems or complications seen, the higher the degree of social restriction: significantly more stoma care problems were seen in the completely isolated group of patients when compared with the patients who were less socially restricted (Spearman correlation coefficient 1 = 0.35, P = 0.003). Especially stoma leakage, peristomal skin irritation, dietary prescriptions, retraction, and prolapse of the stoma have significant impact on the patient's daily life.

CONCLUSION

Stoma surgery has a great influence on a patient's daily life. There is a clear relation between the number of stoma care problems and the degree of social restriction. Follow-up of stoma patients under close surveillance of stoma care nurse to minimize stoma care problems and a careful surgical technique are advocated for good stoma care.