Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Surgical resection versus liver transplant for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma

BACKGROUND

Hepatocellular carcinoma is a major worldwide health problem, involving more than half a million new patients yearly, with a different incidence in different parts of the world. Hepatocellular carcinoma develops in about 80% of cirrhotic patients, and cirrhosis is considered the strongest predisposing factor for it. Surgical resection and liver transplantation are conventional treatment modalities that can offer long-term survival for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the benefits and harms of surgical resection compared with those of liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) in The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Science Citation Index Expanded (SCI-EXPANDED) at ISI Web of Science (last search February 2013). We also searched the abstracts from annual meetings of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, the American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases (AASLD), and the European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL), provided through The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group until February 2013.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised clinical trials comparing surgical resection and hepatic transplantation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The search strategies were run and two authors individually evaluated whether the retrieved studies fulfilled the inclusion criteria.

MAIN RESULTS

No randomised clinical trials comparing surgical resection and liver transplantation as the major methods of treating hepatocellular carcinoma were found.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are no randomised clinical trials comparing surgical resection and liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma treatment.

Hilar lymph nodes sampling at the time of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: to do or not to do? Meta-analysis to determine the impact of hilar lymph nodes metastases on tumor recurrence and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing liver transplantation

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the impact of tumor-positive hilar lymph nodes (LN) on tumor recurrence and survival in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) undergoing liver transplantation (LT). A computer search of the Medline database was carried out. The outcome of patients with positive hilar LN (study group) was compared with that of patients with negative LN (reference group). Five clinical studies evaluating tumor recurrence after LT for HCC according to hilar LN status were identified. Five further clinical studies evaluated patients' survival in reference to LN metastases. The test of heterogeneity for each comparison revealed no significant differences (exact P=0.4638). A significant correlation between tumor-positive LN and tumor recurrence was shown (exact estimation of common odds ratio by 10.44, 95% confidence interval of 3.431-38.59). Furthermore, data analyses using the Fisher-combination test regarding patient survival in the two groups showed a statistical difference (P<0.0001). The negative prognostic value of hilar LN metastasis for both tumor recurrence and survival was confirmed by this analysis. Given the ever-present diagnostic dilemma associated with enlarged hilar LN, especially in hepatitis C-positive patients, hilar LN sampling during LT for HCC could better define patients at risk.

Liver Transplantation and Incidentally Found Hepatocellular Carcinoma in Liver Explants: Need for a New Definition?

BACKGROUND

"Incidentally" identified hepatocellular carcinoma (iHCC) in liver explants after liver transplantation (LTx) is a frequently reported finding, which is characterized with a good prognosis. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the outcome of patients with these tumors in our series and in literature reports, and to compare their prognosis to that of HCC diagnosed preoperatively.

METHODS

From April 1998 to December 2003, 432 patients underwent deceased-donor LTx at our center for nonmalignant indications. An additional 31 patients with a preoperative known HCC (pkHCC) received deceased-donor grafts. A literature search was performed intending to estimate the incidence of iHCC in liver explants and the outcome after LTx.

RESULTS

iHCC was found in 5 of the 432 patients. All five patients are currently alive without evidence of tumor recurrence after a median follow-up of 43 months. On the other hand, in the group of the 31 patients with pkHCC, 22 of them are at the moment alive in a median follow-up of 28 months. When comparing the two groups, no difference in survival could be found (P=0.1419 in log-rank test). Literature reports of 705 instances with iHCC over the past 20 years showed a statistical "better survival" in only 24 cases.

CONCLUSION

Literature reports showed a remarkable "deviation" of the expected tumor characteristics for the iHCC. Obviously, this is because of a widely characterization of iHCC, including also tumors which are rather undetected HCC during the waiting time to LTx. A more precise definition for the iHCC is needed.

Surgical therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma

There is no worldwide consensus of an algorithm for the radical treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Surgical resection, liver transplantation and, recently, local ablation therapies achieve high curative rates in selected patients. However, recurrence of HCC remains a major problem. This review provides an overview of the current surgical treatment options available for patients with HCC.

Predictors of survival after liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma associated with Hepatitis C

The efficacy of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) is not well defined. This study examines the variables that may determine the outcome of OLT for HCC in HCV patients. From 1990 to 1999, 463 OLTs were performed for HCV cirrhosis. Of these patients, 67 with concurrent HCC were included in the study. Univariate and multivariate analyses considered the following variables: gender, pTNM stage, tumor size, number of nodules, vascular invasion, incidental tumors, adjuvant chemotherapy, preoperative chemoembolization, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) tumor marker, lobar distribution, and histological grade. Overall OLT survival of HCV patients diagnosed with concomitant HCC was significantly lower when compared to patients who underwent OLT for HCV alone at 1, 3, and 5 years (75%, 71%, and 55% versus 84%, 76%, and 75%, respectively; P < 0.01). Overall survival of patients with stage I HCC was significantly better than patients with stage II, III, or IV (P < .05). Eleven of 67 patients developed tumor recurrence. Sites of recurrence included transplanted liver (5), lung (5), and bone (1). Twenty-four of 67 patients (36%) died during the follow-up time. Causes of deaths included recurrent HCC in 8 of 24 patients (12%) and recurrent HCV in 3 of 24 patients (4.5%), whereas 13 (19.5%) patients died from causes that were unrelated to HCV or HCC. Both univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that pTNM status (I versus II, III, and IV; P < .05) was a reliable prognostic indicator for patient survival. Presence of vascular invasion (P = .0001) and advanced pTNM staging (P = .038) increased risk of recurrence. Multivariate analysis showed that pretransplant chemoembolization and adjuvant chemotherapy reduced risk of death after OLT in HCC recipients. In conclusion, this study demonstrates the effectiveness of OLT for patients with HCC in a large cohort of chronic HCV patients. Advanced tumor stage, and particularly vascular invasion, are poor prognostic indicators for tumor recurrence. Early pTNM stage, adjuvant chemotherapy, and preoperative chemoembolization were associated with positive outcomes for patients who underwent OLT for concomitant HCV and HCC.

Advances in the surgical management of liver malignancies

Primary malignancies of the liver include tumors arising from the hepatocytes (hepatocellular carcinoma and the fibrolamellar variant) and the intrahepatic bile ducts (intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma). Hepatocellular carcinoma is the most common primary cancer of the liver and is a leading cause of death from cancer worldwide. Although it is uncommon in the United States, the incidence of hepatocellular carcinoma is rising. Hepatitis, ethanol use, and cirrhosis often dominate the clinical picture and may dictate prognosis. New clinical and pathological staging systems have allowed for the more accurate stratification of patients to more appropriately identify patients for resection, transplantation, and percutaneous ablation therapies. A correlation between liver volume and surgical outcome has recently been demonstrated, with small liver remnant size being associated with increased morbidity. Portal vein embolization has therefore been proposed as one way to induce hypertrophy of the anticipated liver remnant before resection. Initial reports have shown that portal vein embolization decreases the incidence of postoperative complications. More recently, systemic chemotherapy and chemoembolization have been investigated as both primary and neoadjuvant therapy. Chemoimmunotherapy with 5-fluorouracil and interferon may be associated with a superior response rate in the fibrolamellar variant of hepatocellular carcinoma. Two recent randomized studies have also indicated improved survival after hepatic artery embolization in selected patients.

Recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma: percutaneous radiofrequency ablation after hepatectomy

PURPOSE

To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy and safety of percutaneous radiofrequency (RF) ablation for recurrent hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the liver after hepatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty-five patients with 53 recurrent HCC tumors in the liver underwent percutaneous RF ablation with ultrasonographic guidance. All patients had a history of hepatic resection for HCC. The mean diameter of recurrent tumors was 2.1 cm (range, 0.8-4.0 cm). All patients were followed up for at least 10 months after ablation (range, 10-40 months; mean, 23 months). Therapeutic efficacy and complications were evaluated with multiphase helical computed tomography (CT) at regular follow-up visits. Overall and disease-free survival rates were calculated.

RESULTS

At follow-up CT after initial RF ablation, 11 (21%) of 53 ablated HCC tumor sites showed residual tumor or local tumor progression. After additional RF ablation, complete ablation of 46 (87%) of 53 tumors was attained. Also at initial follow-up CT, before either additional RF ablation or other treatment was performed, 21 (47%) of 45 patients were found to have 41 new HCC tumors at other liver sites. Of these, nine tumors in eight patients were treatable with a second application of RF ablation. Overall survival rates at 1, 2, and 3 years were 82%, 72%, and 54%, respectively. No deaths or complications requiring further treatment occurred as a result of RF ablation.

CONCLUSION

Percutaneous RF ablation is an effective and safe method for treating recurrent HCC in the liver after hepatectomy, with a good overall patient survival rate.

Indications and limitations of liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is a common cause of cancer-related death worldwide, yet remains difficult to treat, with dismal overall long-term survival rates. Recent strategies using liver transplantation for carefully selected patients with stage I and II HCC and cirrhosis have shown promising results, with 5-year survival rates comparable to survival rates for transplantation patients without malignancy. Currently, however, limited resources and a severe organ shortage make liver transplantation an option for only a limited number of patients with HCC in the United States. Future studies must document the long-term success of this therapy and improve methods for disease control before and after transplantation.

Current status of liver transplantation for hepatocellular cancer

The incidence of hepatocellular cancer is increasing in the United States and is one of the most common cancers worldwide. Traditionally, the gold standard treatment for hepatocellular cancer has been surgical resection, but most patients were not suitable candidates due to advanced disease. Other treatments include locally ablative techniques (cryosurgery, radiofrequency ablation and various injection therapies), chemotherapeutic options and rarely, radiation therapies. In the 1980s, liver transplant emerged as the treatment of choice for end-stage liver disease and also became an option for patients with hepatocellular cancer. When comparing liver transplant with resection in retrospective studies, liver transplant patients had better survival and reduced recurrence. However, not all patients with hepatocellular cancer will be candidates for liver transplant. Size, stage, and histological grade of tumor all affect prognosis after transplant. Use of chemotherapeutic treatments and locally ablative techniques may be beneficial prior to liver transplant, but larger controlled studies are needed. Liver transplant is the most effective treatment for hepatocellular cancer in the subgroup of smaller tumors, but ultimately we are limited by the number of available donors. Future goals in this area include increasing the donor pool and determining optimal management to allow patients to wait for an appropriate donor.

Living-donor versus cadaveric liver transplantation for non-resectable small hepatocellular carcinoma and compensated cirrhosis: a decision analysis

BACKGROUND

Cadaveric liver transplantation is effective for nonresectable early hepatocellular carcinoma. However, the scarcity of cadaveric organs has prompted some centers to use living donors, which guarantees transplantation, but entails a risk to the donor. In the absence of controlled trials, decision analysis can be used to help explicate the tradeoffs involved when considering living donor versus cadaveric liver transplantation for nonresectable early hepatocellular carcinoma.

METHODS

Using a Markov model, a hypothetical cohort of patients with Child's A cirrhosis and a single 3.5-cm tumor received one of three strategies: 1) no transplant; 2) intent to perform cadaveric liver transplantation; or 3) living donor liver transplantation. Data were obtained from natural history and retrospective studies. All probabilities in the model were varied simultaneously using a Monte Carlo simulation.

RESULTS

Living-donor liver transplantation was the best strategy, improving life expectancy by 4.5 years compared with cadaveric liver transplantation. This strategy remained dominant even when varying severity of cirrhosis, age, tumor doubling time, tumor growth pattern, blood type, regional transplant volume, initial tumor size, and rate of progression of cirrhosis.

CONCLUSIONS

Living-donor liver transplantation should confer a substantial survival advantage for patients with compensated cirrhosis and non-resectable early stage hepatocellular carcinoma.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma

OBJECTIVE

To analyze patient and tumor characteristics that influence patient survival to select patients who would most benefit from liver transplantation.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

The selection of patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) for liver transplantation remains controversial.

METHODS

One hundred twelve patients with nonfibrolamellar HCC who underwent a liver transplant from 1985 to 2000 were reviewed. Survival was calculated using the Kaplan-Meier method, with differences in outcome assessed using the log-rank procedure. Multivariate analysis was then performed using a Cox regression model.

RESULTS

Overall patient survival rates were 78%, 63%, and 57% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Patients infected with the hepatitis B virus had a worse 5-year survival than those who were not (43% vs. 64%), with most deaths being attributed to recurrent hepatitis B. However, patients with hepatitis B virus who underwent more recent transplants using antiviral therapy fared as well as those who were negative for the virus, showing a 5-year survival rate of 77%. Patients with vascular invasion by tumor had a worse 5-year survival than patients without vascular invasion (33% vs. 68%). Vascular invasion, tumor size greater than 5 cm, and poorly differentiated tumor grade were predictors of tumor recurrence by univariate analysis; however, only vascular invasion remained significant on multivariate analysis: the rate of tumor recurrence at 5 years was 65% in patients with vascular invasion and only 4% for patients without vascular invasion.

CONCLUSIONS

For well-selected patients with HCC, liver transplantation in the current era can achieve equivalent results to transplantation for nonmalignant indications. Vascular invasion is an indicator of high risk of tumor recurrence but is difficult to detect before transplantation.

Comparison of surgical outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients with hepatitis B versus hepatitis C: a western experience

BACKGROUND

We reviewed our experience in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and chronic hepatitis to determine if differences exist in preoperative status and postoperative survival between those with hepatitis B virus (HBV) and hepatitis C virus (HCV) infections.

METHODS

We reviewed the records of 240 consecutive patients with HCC who underwent hepatic resection or liver transplantation at Mount Sinai Hospital between February 1990 and February 1998. Patients who tested negative for hepatitis B antigen and hepatitis C antibody (74 patients) as well as those who tested positive for both (2 patients) were excluded. Age as well as preoperative platelet count, prothrombin time (PT), albumin, and total bilirubin were measured in all patients. The presence of encephalopathy or ascites also was noted. Explanted livers and resection specimens were examined for size, number, and differentiation of tumors as well as the presence of vascular invasion and cirrhosis in the surrounding parenchyma.

RESULTS

One hundred twenty-one patients with HCC tested positive for HCV, and 43 tested positive for HBV. A significantly higher proportion of patients with HCV required transplant for the treatment of their HCC when compared to those with HBV. In the resection group, patients with HCV were significantly older that those with HBV. They also had significantly lower mean preoperative platelet counts and albumin levels and higher mean PT and total bilirubin levels. Resected patients with HCV had significantly less-differentiated tumors and a higher incidence of vascular invasion and cirrhosis when compared to those with HBV. There was no statistical difference in the multicentricity and size of tumors between the two groups. The 5-year disease-free survival was significantly higher for HBV patients treated with resection when compared to those with HCV (49% vs. 7%, P = .0480). Patients with HCC and HCV had significantly longer 5-year disease-free survival with transplant when compared to resection (48% vs. 7%, P = .0001). Transplanted patients with HBV and HCC had preoperative status, pathological findings, and survival similar to those of patients with HCV.

CONCLUSIONS

Based on preoperative liver function and tumor location, a much higher proportion of HCC patients with HBV were candidates for resection. Significant differences in preoperative status, tumor characteristics and disease-free survival exist between HCC patients with chronic HBV and HCV infection who have not yet reached end-stage liver disease. Serious consideration should be given to transplanting resectable HCC with concomitant HCV, especially in cases with small tumors.

[Hepatocellular carcinoma. Part 2. Treatment]

Recent improvements on the therapeutical management of hepatocellular carcinoma are revised with special attention to evaluate the role of surgery for the disease. Considering that definitive surgical intervention is not feasible in most cases because of extreme tumor extension, multiplicity of tumor foci, and associated advanced liver cirrhosis at the time of diagnosis, others forms of treatment are listed, such as transcatheterarterial chemoembolization, percutaneous ethanol and acetic acid injections, and chemotherapy only to a small portion of patients with no indication for standard treatments. The emerging role of retinoic acid metabolism blocking agents, was examined and may offer a significant new potential treatment for cancer, inclusive the possibility of combining other anticancer drugs with exogenous retinoids or modulation of endogenous retinoids as a real opportunity to advance our ability to treat or prevent human cancer effectively Octreotide, nitrosamine and other drugs are analyzed and is concluded that improves survival and is a valuable alternative in the treatment of inoperable hepatocellular carcinoma. The potential role of intersticial laser coagulation for patients with irresectable hepatic tumors was investigated, and in terms of experience, it has now been developed sufficiently to study its effect on these patients survival. The homeostatic control of angiogenesis and its influences on the tumor growth and for migration of metastatic cells, was focused in this concise review, given that hepatocytes are the source of much of the precursor pool, regulation of angiogenesis may be regarded as a new liver function with important consequences for tissue repair and cancer. Early hepatocellular carcinoma and its recognition in routine clinical practice contributes to improved patients survival. Recombinant-Interferon-alpha therapy surely prevents, the development of cirrhosis or hepatocellular carcinoma in about one-third of patients, with chronic hepatitis C, with sustained response. Finally, in individuals with life-threatening liver disease, such as those with cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, the liver transplantation, must be considered, besides controversial, however, with increasing experience the results of the procedure in these patients have improved, and may offer a better long-term survival than liver resection.

Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma

Screening for hepatocellular carcinoma has become widely practised in the management of patients with end-stage liver disease. However, the theoretical basis for this practice is largely lacking. Issues such as the selection of the target population and the correct method of confirming positive screening tests have yet to be resolved. Complicating the assessment of screening strategies is the poor literature on comparing different forms of therapy. Nonrandomized, uncontrolled studies that do not account for lead-time bias make it frequently impossible to know whether an applied treatment has really improved survival. Despite these difficulties, screening is reality, and strategies have to be devised to efficiently screen patients, find small tumours and apply effective treatments. Some practical strategies are discussed.

Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma in patients without underlying liver disease: a systematic review

Liver resection is the treatment of choice for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) occurring in the absence of underlying chronic liver disease. Orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT) is reserved for patients with unresectable disease but remains controversial. The aim of this study was to review the published literature on OLT for HCC in patients without coexisting chronic liver disease. A Medline-based search identified 126 patients reported in 16 papers over the last 32 years. One third had fibrolamellar HCC (FL-HCC), and two thirds had non-FL-HCC. Recurrence data were given in 55 patients of whom 27 had tumor recurrence. Seventy-five percent of the recurrences occurred within the first 2 years after OLT, although recurrences were reported up to 72 months after OLT for FL-HCC. The 5-year survival rate was greater in patients who underwent transplantation for FL-HCC than for non-FL-HCC (39.4% and 11.2%, respectively). There was insufficient information available to determine the influence of tumor size, distribution, stage, and vascular invasion on survival, although most patients in whom tumor characteristics were specified had advanced disease. This study indicates that FL-HCC carcinoma is a more favorable indication for OLT than non-FL-HCC in patients without underlying liver disease, although more detailed prognostic information is required to improve patient selection.

Arterial chemoembolization before liver transplantation in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: marked tumor necrosis, but no survival benefit?

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Hepatic artery chemoembolization was introduced in the treatment of patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma waiting for liver transplantation. The rationale for this preoperative treatment was to control tumor growth during the waiting period and to improve long-term survival. This study aimed to investigate whether preoperative chemoembolization not only induces marked tumor necrosis but also has a survival benefit.

METHODS

In this study 21 patients with hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent pretransplant chemoembolization (group I) were compared with 21 historical control patients (group II) without preoperative chemoembolization in a case-control study. The number of pretransplant chemoembolizations in each patient in group I varied between 1 and 5 with a mean of 2.44+/-1.15. In addition, six patients of this group received preoperative systemic chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Overall, there were no differences in survival between the groups with and without pretransplant chemoembolization at 1 year (60.8% vs 61.5%) and at 3 years (48.4% vs 53.9%). In group I, three patients developed unexplained severe pneumonia, leading to death very early after liver transplantation. Marked tumor necrosis (>50%) was found in 14 cases in group I. In 6 out of these 14 patients, total tumor necrosis was observed.

CONCLUSION

Although preoperative chemoembolization or chemotherapy induced marked tumor necrosis, these patients showed no benefit in survival compared to historical controls, and appeared to be at higher risk of developing immediate postoperative infective complications.

Practical considerations in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) represents one of the most common neoplasms worldwide. To date, curative treatment options include liver transplantation or resection. Unfortunately, most patients are detected with nonresectable or -transplantable HCC due to disease extension or comorbid factors, and are therefore candidates only for palliative treatments. Palliative medical treatments, including systemic chemotherapy, immunotherapy or hormonal manipulation, have a borderline activity on HCC and cannot be recommended outside clinical trials. A high response rate has been reported with local therapies such as transcatheter arterial embolisation, intra-arterial chemotherapy or percutaneous alcohol (ethanol) injection, but as there is no clear evidence of a survival advantage for these treatment modalities, further investigations are required. Multidisciplinary treatment, including preoperative cytoreduction or postoperative adjuvant therapy, is currently under investigation, with encouraging survival results. HCC patients should be evaluated within clinical trials, possibly randomised and with homogeneous prognostic factors, in order that we may find the answer to all these important questions.

Results of liver transplantation in children with unresectable liver tumors

Liver cancer is an uncommon indication for liver transplantation in children. Between 1986 and 1995, five children with hepatocellular cancer (HCC), three with hepatoblastoma (HEP), and one with sarcoma were referred to the transplant service. All nine tumors were considered unresectable. Four of the five children with HCC had underlying predisposing conditions (2 hepatitis B, 1 biliary atresia, 1 tyrosinemia). Preoperative evaluation of all patients included careful radiological screening and pretransplantation laparotomy for staging. Two patients with HCC were excluded from further consideration because of intraabdominal spread. Three patients had transplantation (mean age, 6.0 +/- 7.1 years), and all have survived for 1 to 5 years with no evidence of recurrence. Three patients with HEP were assessed (mean age 2.0 +/- 1 years); two had stage 4 disease and one had stage 3. All three received preoperative chemotherapy. The two with stage 4 had thoracotomies as part of their assessment. Two of three patients had a significant decrease in the size of the primary tumor during the waiting period. These two patients and one with stage 4 disease have survived more than 2 years since transplantation, with no recurrence. The third patient had recurrence within 2 months of transplantation. In summary, liver transplantation should be considered for all children who have unresectable hepatic malignancies, given the 83% survival rate and no evidence of tumor recurrence. Stage 4 disease in HEP does not necessarily exclude patients from transplantation. Early referral is encouraged so that tumor spread beyond the liver is minimized.

An analysis of late deaths after liver transplantation

Late deaths (after more than 1 year) after liver transplantation were analyzed in a series of 464 consecutive patients who received liver grafts between 1982 and 1993. Recipients who survived the first posttransplant year (n = 365) had actuarial 5- and 10-year survival rates of 92% and 84%, respectively. Thirty-five patients died between 1.1 and 7.6 years after transplantation (mean, 3.2 +/- 1.9 years). The most common causes of death were related to immunosuppression (40%), namely, chronic rejection, opportunistic infection, and lymphoma. The second most common causes of death were related to the primary disease for which liver transplantation was performed (34.3%), mainly recurrence of hepatobiliary malignancy and hepatitis B. Eight patients (22.9%) died of unrelated and unpredicted causes, most commonly of cardiovascular disease. Although the survival of liver recipients who live beyond the first posttransplant year is excellent, control of rejection and the consequences of chronic immunosuppression are continual threats. Modification of immunosuppression may help in decreasing the mortality of long-term survivors. In addition, better selection of recipients and effective adjuvant therapies (antiviral and antineoplastic) are needed in patients in whom the primary liver disease is notorious for recurrence.

Laparoscopic repair of an incarcerated obturator hernia

Obturator hernia is a rare cause of bowel obstruction. Occurring primarily in elderly women, it has a high incidence of incarceration and a high mortality rate. This report describes the successful laparoscopic reduction and repair of an incarcerated obturator hernia. Using open laparoscopy, an incarcerated obturator hernia was diagnosed intraoperatively. After laparoscopic reduction, a transabdominal preperitoneal repair was completed using polypropylene mesh. The patient recovered uneventfully with no recurrence at 6 months. Laparoscopic techniques have been successfully applied to diagnose, reduce, and repair an incarcerated obturator hernia.

Role of liver transplantation in the treatment of unresectable liver cancer

Resection remains the treatment of choice in liver cancer. In order to avoid liver transplantation in conventionally unresectable tumors ex-situ ("bench" procedure), in-situ and ante-situm resection technique should be preferred whenever feasible. Despite the deficiency of donor organs, a single center experience with 198 patients reveals that liver transplantation continues its role as a therapeutic option for selected patients. At present "favorable" indications for transplantation are International Union against Cancer (UICC) - stage II hepatocellular carcinoma as well as the subtype fibrolamellar carcinoma, uncommon tumors such as epitheloid hemangioendothelioma, hepatoblastoma, and liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors. Due to unsatisfying results, intrahepatic bile duct-, stage III and IV hepatocellular carcinoma, hemangiosarcoma, and liver metastases from nonendocrine primaries should be excluded from liver transplantation alone. For these advanced tumors, especially in cases of extrahepatic involvement, a combination of liver transplantation and multivisceral resection has been proven feasible. However, a significant improvement in patient survival may only be expected only by currently investigated multimodality treatment protocols which will require further randomized studies.

Hepatic resection for hepatocellular carcinoma. An audit of 343 patients

OBJECTIVE

The authors summarize the results of patients who had hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma over a 22-year period.

SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA

Recent reports showed improved perioperative results and long-term prognosis.

METHODS

The perioperative outcome of 343 patients was studied according to three different time periods: before 1987 (n = 149); 1987 to 1991 (n = 128); and 1992 to present (n = 66). Survival analysis was made by stratifying patients into two categories--either before or after 1987. The majority of patients had large tumors (78%), cirrhosis (73%), and a major hepatectomy (73%).

RESULTS

Besides an increased resectability rate (23%), there was a marked reduction of the recent morbidity (32%; p < 0.001), operative (4.5%; NS) and hospital (6%; p < 0.02) mortality rates. The recent surgical approach was identified as a significant contributory factor to the lowered hospital mortality rate. Patients in the latter part of the study had significantly better survival, with a 1-, 3- and 5-year survival rate of 68%, 45%, and 35%, respectively. Early detection and effective treatment of recurrences contributed to the improved prognosis.

CONCLUSIONS

The recent management strategy and technological advances improved the results of surgical treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma.

Management options for primary hepatocellular carcinoma. An overview

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the seventh most common cancer in men and the ninth most common cancer in women with 500,000 to 1,000,000 new cases per year. Several risk factors (sex hormones, alcohol, thorotrast, aflatoxin B1, hepatitis B or C, haemochromatosis, alpha 1-antitrypsin deficiency, tyrosinemia, porphyria cutanea tarda, acute intermittent porphyria, Wilson's disease) associated with the development of HCC have been identified from epidemiological studies. The diagnosis is usually based on a combination of clinical and laboratory findings together with radiographic and histopathologic characteristics. HCC remains difficult to treat with a median survival of 3 to 6 months after the onset of symptoms. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment for HCC. Transcatheter arterial embolization and percutaneous ethanol injection have been used but neither therapy has been evaluated in a prospective randomized study. Combination treatment (e.g. chemotherapy and resection) may be of value but randomized controlled trials with long-term follow-up are still needed. Liver transplantation should be reserved for carefully selected patients.