Sequential assembly of newly synthesized histones on replicating SV40 DNA

Nucleosome assembly and disassembly pathways in vitro

Structural fluctuations of nucleosomes modulate the access to internal DNA in eukaryotic cells; clearly characterisation of this fundamental process is crucial to understanding gene regulation. Here we apply PhAST (Photochemical Analysis of Structural Transitions) to monitor at a base pair level, structural alterations induced all along the DNA upon histone binding or release. By offering the first reliable, detailed comparison of nucleosome assembly and disassembly in vitro, we reveal similarities and differences between the two processes. We identify multiple, sequential intermediate states characterised by specific PhAST signals whose localisation and amplitude reflect asymmetries of DNA/histone interactions with respect to the nucleosome pseudo dyad. These asymmetries involve not only the DNA extremities but also regions close to the pseudo dyad. Localisations of asymmetries develop in a consistent manner during both assembly and disassembly processes; they primarily reflect the DNA sequence effect on the efficiency of DNA-histone binding. More unexpectedly, the amplitude component of PhAST signals not only evolves as a function of intermediate states but does so differently between assembly and disassembly pathways. Our observation of differences between assembly and disassembly opens up new avenues to define the role of the DNA sequence in processes underlying the regulation of gene expression. Overall, we provide new insights into how the intrinsic properties of DNA are integrated into a holistic mechanism that controls chromatin structure.

Antivirals against human polyomaviruses: Leaving no stone unturned

Human polyomaviruses (HPyVs) encompass more than 10 species infecting 30%-90% of the human population without significant illness. Proven HPyV diseases with documented histopathology affect primarily immunocompromised hosts with manifestations in brain, skin and renourinary tract such as polyomavirus-associated nephropathy (PyVAN), polyomavirus-associated haemorrhagic cystitis (PyVHC), polyomavirus-associated urothelial cancer (PyVUC), progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML), Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), Trichodysplasia spinulosa (TS) and pruritic hyperproliferative keratinopathy. Although virus-specific immune control is the eventual goal of therapy and lasting cure, antiviral treatments are urgently needed in order to reduce or prevent HPyV diseases and thereby bridging the time needed to establish virus-specific immunity. However, the small dsDNA genome of only 5 kb of the non-enveloped HPyVs only encodes 5-7 viral proteins. Thus, HPyV replication relies heavily on host cell factors, thereby limiting both, number and type of specific virus-encoded antiviral targets. Lack of cost-effective high-throughput screening systems and relevant small animal models complicates the preclinical development. Current clinical studies are limited by small case numbers, poorly efficacious compounds and absence of proper randomized trial design. Here, we review preclinical and clinical studies that evaluated small molecules with presumed antiviral activity against HPyVs and provide an outlook regarding potential new antiviral strategies.

High-resolution biophysical analysis of the dynamics of nucleosome formation

We describe a biophysical approach that enables changes in the structure of DNA to be followed during nucleosome formation in in vitro reconstitution with either the canonical "Widom" sequence or a judiciously mutated sequence. The rapid non-perturbing photochemical analysis presented here provides 'snapshots' of the DNA configuration at any given moment in time during nucleosome formation under a very broad range of reaction conditions. Changes in DNA photochemical reactivity upon protein binding are interpreted as being mainly induced by alterations in individual base pair roll angles. The results strengthen the importance of the role of an initial (H3/H4)2 histone tetramer-DNA interaction and highlight the modulation of this early event by the DNA sequence. (H3/H4)2 binding precedes and dictates subsequent H2A/H2B-DNA interactions, which are less affected by the DNA sequence, leading to the final octameric nucleosome. Overall, our results provide a novel, exciting way to investigate those biophysical properties of DNA that constitute a crucial component in nucleosome formation and stabilization.

NMR studies of DNA support the role of pre-existing minor groove variations in nucleosome indirect readout

We investigated how the intrinsic sequence-dependent properties probed via the phosphate linkages (BI ↔ BII equilibrium) influence the preferred shape of free DNA, and how this affects the nucleosome formation. First, this exploits NMR solution studies of four B-DNA dodecamers that together cover 39 base pairs of the 5' half of the sequence 601, of special interest for nucleosome formation. The results validate our previous prediction of a systematic, general sequence effect on the intrinsic backbone BII propensities. NMR provides new evidence that the backbone behavior is intimately coupled to the minor groove width. Second, application of the backbone behavior predictions to the full sequence 601 and other relevant sequences demonstrates that alternation of intrinsic low and high BII propensities, coupled to intrinsic narrow and wide minor grooves, largely coincides with the sinusoidal variations of the DNA minor groove width observed in crystallographic structures of the nucleosome. This correspondence is much poorer with low affinity sequences. Overall, the results indicate that nucleosome formation involves an indirect readout process implicating pre-existing DNA minor groove conformations. It also illustrates how the prediction of the intrinsic structural DNA behavior offers a powerful framework to gain explanatory insight on how proteins read DNA.

Assembling chromatin: the long and winding road

It has been over 35 years since the acceptance of the "chromatin subunit" hypothesis, and the recognition that nucleosomes are the fundamental repeating units of chromatin fibers. Major subjects of inquiry in the intervening years have included the steps involved in chromatin assembly, and the chaperones that escort histones to DNA. The following commentary offers an historical perspective on inquiries into the processes by which nucleosomes are assembled on replicating and nonreplicating chromatin. This article is part of a Special Issue entitled: Histone chaperones and Chromatin assembly.

Identification of a rapidly formed nonnucleosomal histone-DNA intermediate that is converted into chromatin by ACF

Chromatin assembly involves the combined action of histone chaperones and ATP-dependent motor proteins. Here, we investigate the mechanism of nucleosome assembly with a purified chromatin assembly system containing the histone chaperone NAP1 and the ATP-dependent motor protein ACF. These studies revealed the rapid formation of a stable nonnucleosomal histone-DNA intermediate that is converted into canonical nucleosomes by ACF. The histone-DNA intermediate does not supercoil DNA like a canonical nucleosome, but has a nucleosome-like appearance by atomic force microscopy. This intermediate contains all four core histones, lacks NAP1, and is formed by the initial deposition of histones H3-H4. Conversion of the intermediate into histone H1-containing chromatin results in increased resistance to micrococcal nuclease digestion. These findings suggest that the histone-DNA intermediate corresponds to nascent nucleosome-like structures, such as those observed at DNA replication forks. Related complexes might be formed during other chromatin-directed processes such as transcription, DNA repair, and histone exchange.

Small DNA tumour viruses and their contributions to our understanding of transcription control

The study of small DNA tumour viruses like SV40 and polyoma was one of the major entry points for the study of eukaryotes. It opened fields like gene structure, transcription or replication control, chromatin structure and cell transformation. This review outlines the breakthroughs that occurred at the end of the 1970s and during the 1980s in our understanding of gene structure and the basic processes involved in control of gene expression starting with DNA tumour viruses and reaching their cellular hosts. These developments were made possible by concomitant advances in the isolation of restriction enzymes, developing DNA sequencing protocols, DNA cloning, DNA transfections, in vitro transcription systems and isolation of sequence specific DNA binding protein among others. The conceptual and methodological advances that resulted from the studies of small DNA tumour viruses opened the era for the study of host genomes far more complex, culminating with the establishment of the sequence and a functional map of the human genome.

In vivo study of the nucleosome assembly functions of ASF1 histone chaperones in human cells

Histone chaperones have been implicated in nucleosome assembly and disassembly as well as histone modification. ASF1 is a highly conserved histone H3/H4 chaperone that synergizes in vitro with two other histone chaperones, chromatin assembly factor 1 (CAF-1) and histone repression A factor (HIRA), in DNA synthesis-coupled and DNA synthesis-independent nucleosome assembly. Here, we identify mutants of histones H3.1 and H3.3 that are unable to interact with human ASF1A and ASF1B isoforms but that are still competent to bind CAF-1 and HIRA, respectively. We show that these mutant histones are inefficiently deposited into chromatin in vivo. Furthermore, we found that both ASF1A and ASF1B participate in the DNA synthesis-independent deposition of H3.3 in HeLa cells, thus highlighting an unexpected role for ASF1B in this pathway. This pathway does not require interaction of ASF1 with HIRA. We provide the first direct determination that ASF1A and ASF1B play a role in the efficiency of nucleosome assembly in vivo in human cells.

On the Mechanism of Nucleosome Assembly by Histone Chaperone NAP1

The process of mononucleosome assembly mediated by histone chaperone NAP1 was investigated using DNA fragments 146 and 207 bp in length containing the Lytechinus variegatus 5 S rDNA nucleosome positioning sequence. A quantitative description was derived using gel electrophoresis and fluorescent anisotropy data. First, NAP1-bound H3.H4 was released forming a DNA-histone tetramer complex with a time constant of k(1) = (2.5 +/- 0.7) . 10(4) m(-1) s(-1). The tetrasome was converted quickly (k(2) = (4.1 +/- 3.5) . 10(5) m(-1) s(-1)), by the addition of a single H2A.H2B dimer, into a "hexasome," i.e. a nucleosome lacking one H2A.H2B dimer. From this intermediate a nucleosome was formed by the addition of a second H2A.H2B dimer with an average rate constant k(3) = (6.6 +/- 1.4) . 10(3) m(-1) s(-1). For the back-reaction, significant differences were observed between the 146- and 207-bp DNA upon substitution of the canonical H2A histone with H2A.Z. The distinct nucleosome/hexasome ratios were reflected in the corresponding equilibrium dissociation constants and revealed some differences in nucleosome stability. In a fourth reaction, NAP1 mediated the binding of linker histone H1 to the nucleosome, completing the chromatosome structure with k(4) = (7.7 +/- 3.7) . 10(3) m(-1) s(-1). The activity of the chromatin remodeling complex ACF did not increase the kinetics of the mononucleosome assembly process.

Inheritance of chromatin states

The packaging of regulatory DNA within the eukaryotic chromosome has considerable potential not only for modulating the transcriptional activity of genes, but also for propagating states that are permissive or restrictive for transcription. Sequence-specific transcription factors, histones and their modifications, chromodomain proteins and enzymes that modify histones, DNA methylation and proteins that recognize methylated DNA could all play independent or interrelated roles in regulating gene activity. They all also have the potential of propagating their interactions with nascent DNA following replication. However, observations on the phenomenon of X chromosome inactivation suggest that the formation and stability of specific histone-DNA interactions through replication may be central to the inheritance of chromatin states, and that other molecular mechanisms have supporting roles. The future offers the exciting prospect of reconstructing the propagation of stable active or repressed chromatin states in vitro, and consequently understanding the events occurring at the replication fork in molecular detail.

Comparison of replicative and non-replicative chromatin assembly pathways in HeLa cell extracts

It has been reported that chromatin assembly in mammalian cell extracts depends exclusively or preferentially on ongoing DNA replication (Stillman, B. (1986) Cell 45, 555-565). More recently, this view has been challenged demonstrating that, in the same extracts, chromatin can also be formed efficiently in the absence of DNA replication (Gruss et al. (1990) EMBO J. 9, 2911-2922). The experiments, described in this communication, were performed to resolve this apparent contradiction. We found that there are at least two distinct in vitro pathways for chromatin assembly in HeLa cell extracts. The replicative pathway requires a nuclear protein, most likely identical with the chromatin assembly factor, described by Stillman (1986, Cell 45, 555-565), and the free soluble histones present in the cytosol of S phase cells. In contrast, a non-replicative pathway was identified that depends on isolated nuclear histones. As one component of the non-replicative assembly pathway we identified a cytosolic factor that was purified to apparent homogeneity and shown to be an acidic 50 kDa polypeptide. The isolated cytosolic 50 kDa protein efficiently promoted nucleosome assembly as demonstrated by one- and two-dimensional gel electrophoresis of in vitro packaged plasmid DNA.

Mode of deposition of the histone subtypes during replication

By using various approaches, we have observed in cycling mouse erythroleukemia cells a characteristic sequential deposition of newly synthesized histones. Control experiments confirmed that this deposition is replicative and is not associated with a process of histone replacement. Interestingly, each of the newly synthesized variants of histones H3, H2B, and H2A was found to deposit simultaneously. This observation indicates that the mechanisms governing the nucleosome assembly do not discriminate among the variants and thus supports the idea that they have equal biological significance. In contrast, a different mode of deposition was found for the regular subtypes H1A and H1B, suggesting a structural and functional difference between these two histones.

Mechanism of chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes

We have analyzed the chromatin assembly reaction catalyzed by the Xenopus oocyte extract (S-150). A 50 S complex is formed upon mixing the 17 S pUC DNA and the S-150. Mature histones are not detected in this complex, which contains relaxed DNA and protein, and generates subnucleosomal 7 S particles upon digestion with micrococcal nuclease. The relaxed nucleoprotein is gradually supercoiled into nucleosomal chromatin in the S-150, via a pathway that requires ATP and is blocked by novobiocin, and this process is accompanied by the appearance of mature histones H3 and H4. Isolated complexes also supercoil in vitro, which implies the complex is a kit that contains histone precursors, as well as topoisomerases and other enzymes required for assembly. We discuss the biological implications of these findings.

Fractionation of newly replicated nucleosomes by density labeling and rate zonal centrifugation for the analysis of the deposition sites of newly synthesized nucleosomal core histones

We have found that partial resolution of newly replicated nucleosomes can be achieved by rate zonal centrifugation through sucrose density gradients preformed in heavy water. Nucleosome samples were obtained from MH-134SC cells density labeled with 5-iododeoxyuridine in the presence of suitable isotopic precursors. The method is simple and can be performed under conditions that do not destabilize the nucleosome structure. This gave us an exciting opportunity to study the deposition sites of newly synthesized histones. Nucleosomes were obtained from cells pulse-labeled simultaneously with 5-iododeoxyuridine and [3H]lysine for the rate zonal analysis. Proteins in the resulting fractions were resolved by sodium dodecyl sulfate/polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, and visualized by silver staining and fluorography. The distribution of newly synthesized H2A and H2B coincided closely with that of bulk nucleosomes. The distribution of newly synthesized H3 and H4 was shifted to the bottom sides of the bulk nucleosome peaks, but not so far as to the putative peaks of newly replicated (dense) nucleosomes. This means that newly synthesized histones are deposited on DNA in disproportionate amounts and that their sites of deposition are not restricted to newly replicated DNA.

Exchange of histones H1, H2A, and H2B in vivo

We have asked whether histones synthesized in the absence of DNA synthesis can exchange into nucleosomal structures. DNA synthesis was inhibited by incubating hepatoma tissue culture cells in medium containing 5.0 mM hydroxyurea for 40 min. During the final 20 min, the cells were pulsed with [3H]lysine to radiolabel the histones (all five histones are substantially labeled under these conditions). By two electrophoretic techniques, we demonstrate that histones H1, H2A, and H2B synthesized in the presence of hydroxyurea do not merely associate with the surface of the chromatin but instead exchange with preexisting histones so that for the latter two histones there is incorporation into nucleosome structures. On the other hand, H3 and H4 synthesized during this same time period appear to be only weakly bound, if at all, to chromatin. These two histones have been isolated from postnuclear washes and purified. Some possible implications of in vivo exchange are discussed.

Primary organization of nucleosomal core particles is invariable in repressed and active nuclei from animal, plant and yeast cells

A refined map for the linear arrangement of histones along DNA in nucleosomal core particles has been determined by DNA-protein crosslinking. On one strand of 145-bp core DNA, histones are aligned in the following order: (5') H2B25,35-H455,65-H375,85,95/H488-H2B105,11 5-H2A118-H3135,145/H2A145 (3') (the subscripts give approximate distance in nucleotides of the main histone contacts from the 5'-end). Hence, the histone tetramer (H3,H4)2 and two dimers (H2A-H2B) are arranged on double-stranded core DNA in a symmetrical and rather autonomous way: H2A/H3-(H2A-H2B)-(H3,H4)2-(H2B-H2A)-H3/H2A. The primary organization was found to be very similar in core particles isolated from repressed nuclei of sea urchin sperm and chicken erythrocytes, from active in replication and transcription nuclei of Drosophila embryos and yeast and from somatic cells of lily. These data show that (i) the core structure is highly conserved in evolution and (ii) the overall inactivation of chromatin does not affect the arrangement of histones along DNA and thus does not seem to be regulated on this level of the core structure.

Interactions between core histones and chromatin at physiological ionic strength

Addition of core histones to chromatin or chromatin core particles at physiological ionic strength results in soluble nucleohistone complexes when polyglutamic acid is included in the sample. The interaction between nucleosomes and added core histones is strong enough to inhibit nucleosome formation on a closed circular DNA in the same solution. Complexes consisting of core particles and core histones run as discrete nucleoprotein particles on polyacrylamide gels. Consistent with the electrophoretic properties of these particles, protein cross-linking with dimethyl suberimidate indicates that added core histones are bound as excess octamers. Histones in the excess octamers do not exchange with nucleosomal core histones at an ionic strength of 0.1 M and can be selectively removed from core particles by incubating the complexes in a solution containing sufficient DNA. Under conditions where added histones are confined to the surface of chromatin, the excess histones are mobile and can migrate onto a contiguous extension of naked DNA and form nucleosomes.

Histone crosslinking patterns indicate dynamic binding of histone H1 in chromatin

Crosslinking of histone H1 molecules to each other and to the core histones with bifunctional reagents in mouse liver nuclei and chromatin was compared with that under the conditions of random 'contacts' between these molecules. The patterns of crosslinking of the H1 subfractions (H1A, H1B, and H10) to each other in nuclei, chromatin and in solution at different ionic strengths due to random collisions were essentially the same. Moreover, the contacts between the H1 molecules were qualitatively the same in nuclei, chromatin and in solution also at the level of the chymotryptic halves of the H1 molecules. The contacts between the H1 molecules and the core histones in nuclei were similar to those obtained in chromatin at 70 mM NaCl, when H1 molecules readily migrate, and at 0.6 M NaCl, when H1 molecules are dissociated from chromatin. We conclude that spatial arrangement of H1 subfractions and mutual orientation of H1 molecules in isolated nuclei are random-like at least in terms of cross-linking. The static and dynamic models of histone H1 binding to chromatin compatible with the known data are considered. Although unequivocal verification of the models is not possible at present, the dynamic models do correspond better to recent data on the location of the histone H1 in nuclei and chromatin.

Chromatin assembly in Xenopus oocytes: in vitro studies

We describe and characterize a complex reaction that catalyzes DNA supercoiling and chromatin assembly in vitro. A Xenopus oocyte extract supplemented with ATP and Mg++ converts DNA circles into minichromosomes that display a native, 200 bp periodicity. When supercoiled DNA is added to this extract it undergoes a time-dependent series of topological changes, which precisely mimic those found when the DNA is microinjected into oocytes. As judged by the conformation of the subsequently deproteinized DNA, the supercoiled DNA is first relaxed, in a reaction that takes 4 min, and then it is resupercoiled in a slower process that takes 4 hr. The relaxation is partially inhibited by EDTA, to an extent that suggests that that it is catalyzed by a type I DNA topoisomerase. The resupercoiling , on the other hand, requires ATP and Mg++, is completely inhibited by EDTA, and is inhibited by novobiocin in a manner that suggests it is catalyzed by a type II DNA topoisomerase. These findings, and the ones reported in the preceding paper ( Ryoji and Worcel , 1984), lead us to propose that chromatin assembly is an active, ATP-driven process.

In vitro exchange of nucleosomal histones H2a and H2b

We have asked whether exogenous, radiolabeled histones can exchange with nucleosomal histones in an in vitro system. Using two different electrophoretic techniques, we were able to separate the histones contained in nucleosomes from those histones which were simply bound to the surface of the chromatin. Fluorography was used to determine which of the exogenous histones exchange with the nucleosomal histones. We observed substantial exchange of histones H1, H2a, and H2b when the chromatin and exogenous histones were incubated under approximately physiological conditions. We have also observed a small amount of exchange of H2a and H2b, as well as a substantial exchange of H1, from one chromatin fragment to another. Other conditions affecting the exchange of histones H2a and H2b are also reported.

Chromatin replication, reconstitution and assembly

Many previously held concepts about the replication of chromatin have recently been revised, or seriously challenged. For instance, within the last two years, evidence has accumulated to indicate that newly synthesized DNA is not the sole site of deposition of newly synthesized histones, and that histones are not only made, but are assembled into chromatin in the absence of DNA synthesis. Furthermore, segregation of parental histones to daughter DNA duplexes may be bidirectional, rather than the previously accepted unidirectional mechanism. The storage of histones prior to assembly apparently involves histone pairs rather than octamers, and similarly, histones associate with DNA in (apparent) pairs, rather than as pre-assembled octameric units. It is currently questioned whether or not nucleoplasmin is involved in either histone storage or nucleosome assembly. The onset of histone synthesis has recently been found to occur in late G1 rather than in S, and thus is independent of DNA synthesis; however, the cessation of histone synthesis is linked to that of DNA. Thus, there emerges from this newly accumulated data the conclusion that chromatin biosynthesis is not as straightforward as was believed just a few years ago. As we review the evidence on each of these subjects, we attempt to point out directions for future experimentation.

Organization of the newly replicated chromatin in the vicinity of the replication fork

Ehrlich ascites tumour cells were pulse-labelled with [3H]thymidine for 1 min or were treated with cycloheximide and labelled with [3H]thymidine for 45 min. The kinetics of digestion with micrococcal nuclease of both pulse-labelled and cycloheximide chromatins showed that they exhibited increased susceptibility towards the enzyme. At the same time their release from the nucleus was retarded and this was interpreted to mean that, unlike the bulk of chromatin, they were tightly bound to a fixed nuclear structure. When subjected to an equilibrium metrizamide-triethanolamine density gradient centrifugation both pulse-labelled and cycloheximide chromatins banded at higher density than control chromatin, which was an indication of their higher protein to DNA ratio. After a mild trypsinization, eliminating H1 and the nonhistone proteins, the pulse-labelled chromatin sedimented to the same density as control chromatin, and the cycloheximide chromatin sedimented to a density which was intermediate between those of control chromatin and free DNA. This result showed that the newly replicated chromatin had the same, and the cycloheximide chromatin half the amount of core histones present in control chromatin.

Effects of pH on low-salt transition of chromatin core particles

The low-salt transition of chicken erythrocyte core particles containing uniform 145 base pair DNA was studied as a function of pH and of salt concentration. Intrinsic tyrosine fluorescence was used to follow the changes. Potassium salts of the anions C1-, H2PO4-, and SO4(2-) were indistinguishable in their ability to affect the transition. Divalent cations (Mg2+, Mn2+, Ca2+) were effective at 36-fold lower total concentration than monovalent cations (Li+, Na+, K+, Tris+), but no significant differences were observed within the two classes of cations. These results indicate that cation binding to the core particle is involved in the transition. At pH 9 the transition was broadened and shifted to higher monovalent cation concentration as compared to that at pH 6. At both pHs the fluorescence changes could be resolved into two steps by numerical least-squares analysis. On the basis of what is known about histone--histone interactions, a two-step mechanism is suggested, involving changes in the interactions between dimers of histones 2a and 2b with a tetramer of histones 3 and 4. The pH-induced changes appear to be correlated with a structural transition, which was detected as a function of pH at near physiological ionic strength (0.1 M). This structural change was accompanied by a small decrease in the tyrosine fluorescence anisotropy. An apparent pKa value near 7 is indicated, suggesting that the structural changes involved may be of physiological significance.

Nucleosomes containing histones H1 or H5 are closely interspersed in chromatin

The distribution of histones H1 and H5 along chromatin fibers has been examined in the nucleated hen erythrocyte. Nucleosome oligomers, produced by micrococcal nuclease digestion of nuclei, were sequentially reacted with affinity-chromatography purified rabbit anti-H5 and sheep anti-rabbit antibodies. Quantitation of the relative amounts of H1 and H5 in the precipitated and supernatant fractions as a function of the oligomer number was consistent with a close interspersion of both types of histones, probably a random one. This conclusion was supported by the immunoprecipitation of longer chromatin fibers. This pattern of distribution appears to apply both to bulk chromatin and to chromatin inactivated during the maturation of the erythrocyte.

In vivo assembly of newly synthesized histones

Following a labeling period of 2 min, HeLa histones continue to accumulate in chromatin for 10 min, indicating the presence of a histone pool. During the accumulation period, H2A and H2B enter chromatin immediately, while entry of H3 and H4 is more prolonged. Association of newly synthesized core histones with chromatin does not necessarily indicate assembly. When 2-min [3H]lysine-labeled chromatin is exposed to 0.45 M NaCl, nearly half of the newly synthesized histones are dissociated, while mature core histones are stable. H2A and 70% of H2B are salt stable and remain with newly synthesized polynucleosomes. About 30% of H2B, 50% of H4, and all of H3 are salt labile; thus, both the new nucleosomal core histones and salt-labile new core histones are nonstoichiometric. Pulse-labeled core histones are more trypsin-sensitive than mature histones. When the salt-labile, newly synthesized histones are removed, the remaining proteins have the same trypsin sensitivity as bulk core protein. Examination of the tryptic peptides indicated that the increased trypsin sensitivity was due to complete destruction of the loosely associated core histones which undergo a lag prior to assembly. The altered order of appearance of two peptides in stripped, newly assembled nucleosomes indicates that the conformation in these particles is different from that in mature chromatin.

Terminal stages of SV40 DNA replication proceed via multiply intertwined catenated dimers

We have identified a new class of SV40 replicative intermediates which consists of a least 20 discrete DNA species. All members of this class are catenated dimers, two circular molecules of SV40 duplex DNA linked topologically by one or more intertwining events. Most of these molecules are linked by several intertwining events, and the range of linkage states observed runs from L = 1 to L = 10. A catenated dimer with a given linkage state is assigned to one of three distinct families (A, B or C) depending on the open or covalently closed nature of its two circular components: in form A catenated dimers, both circles are nicked or gapped; in form B, one of the circles is supercoiled; and in form C, both circles are supercoiled. Members of all three of these families are found in SV40 chromatin pulse-labeled with 3H-thymidine, and together they comprise 10-20% of the total replicative form SV40 DNA, appearing as a discrete series of electrophoretically resolved bands superimposed upon a continuous smear of growing cairns structures. The distribution of linkage states varies between the families, A being the most intertwined and C the least intertwined. Upon a chase with cold thymidine, label is lost rapidly from all these catenated DNA species. We suggest that the sequence A leads to B leads to C leads to mature monomeric supercoiled SV40 DNA represents the final stages of SV40 replication, and that a special enzyme activity exists in vivo to uncatenate the SV40 daughter chromosomes.