Clinical pharmacology and drug safety: lessons from hirudin

Updates on Anticoagulation and Laboratory Tools for Therapy Monitoring of Heparin, Vitamin K Antagonists and Direct Oral Anticoagulants

Anticoagulant drugs have been used to prevent and treat thrombosis. However, they are associated with risk of hemorrhage. Therefore, prior to their clinical use, it is important to assess the risk of bleeding and thrombosis. In case of older anticoagulant drugs like heparin and warfarin, dose adjustment is required owing to narrow therapeutic ranges. The established monitoring methods for heparin and warfarin are activated partial thromboplastin time (APTT)/anti-Xa assay and prothrombin time – international normalized ratio (PT-INR), respectively. Since 2008, new generation anticoagulant drugs, called direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs), have been widely prescribed to prevent and treat several thromboembolic diseases. Although the use of DOACs without routine monitoring and frequent dose adjustment has been shown to be safe and effective, there may be clinical circumstances in specific patients when measurement of the anticoagulant effects of DOACs is required. Recently, anticoagulation therapy has received attention when treating patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this review, we discuss the mechanisms of anticoagulant drugs—heparin, warfarin, and DOACs and describe the methods used for the measurement of their effects. In addition, we discuss the latest findings on thrombosis mechanism in patients with COVID-19 with respect to biological chemistry.

The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of dabigatran etexilate, a new oral direct thrombin inhibitor, in healthy male subjects

AIMS

The novel direct thrombin inhibitor (DTI), dabigatran etexilate (Boehringer Ingelheim Pharma GmbH & Co. KG), shows potential as an oral antithrombotic agent. Two double-blind, randomized trials were undertaken to investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD) and tolerability of orally administered dabigatran etexilate in healthy male subjects.

METHODS

Dabigatran etexilate or placebo was administered orally at single doses of 10-400 mg (n = 40) or at multiple doses of 50-400 mg three times daily for 6 days (n = 40). Plasma and urine samples were collected over time to determine the PK profile of dabigatran. PD activity was assessed by its effects on blood coagulation parameters: activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT), prothrombin time (PT), reported as international normalized ratio (INR), thrombin time (TT), and ecarin clotting time (ECT). All adverse events were recorded.

RESULTS

Dabigatran etexilate was rapidly absorbed with peak plasma concentrations of dabigatran reached within 2 h of administration. This was followed by a rapid distribution/elimination phase and a terminal phase, with associated estimated half-lives of 8-10 h and 14-17 h with single and multiple dose administrations, respectively. Dabigatran exhibited linear PK characteristics with dose-proportional increases observed in maximum plasma concentration and area under the curve. Steady-state conditions were reached within 3 days with multiple dosing. The mean apparent volume of distribution during the terminal phase (V(z)/F) of 1860 l (range 1430-2400 l) and the apparent total clearance after oral administration (CL(tot)/F) of 2031 ml min(-1) (range 1480-2430), were dose independent. Time curves for aPTT, INR, TT and ECT paralleled plasma concentration-time curves with values increasing rapidly and in a dose-dependent manner. At the highest dose of 400 mg administered three times daily, maximum prolongations over baseline of 3.1 (aPTT), 3.5 (INR), 29 (TT) and 9.5-fold (ECT) were observed. Dabigatran underwent conjugation with glucuronic acid to form pharmacologically active conjugates that accounted for approximately 20% of total dabigatran in plasma. Overall, variability in PK parameters was low to moderate, with an average interindividual coefficient of variation (CV) of approximately 30% and variability in PD parameters was low, with CV < 10%. Of the four assays, TT and ECT exhibited the greatest sensitivity and precision within the anticipated therapeutic dose range. Bleeding events were few and were mild-to-moderate in intensity, occurring only in the higher, multiple dose groups.

CONCLUSIONS

These data suggest that dabigatran etexilate is a promising novel oral DTI with predictable PK and PD characteristics and good tolerability. Further investigation of dabigatran etexilate for the treatment and prophylaxis of patients with arterial and venous thromboembolic disorders, acute coronary syndromes and other medical conditions is warranted.

Effects of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran on ex vivo coagulation time in orthopaedic surgery patients: a population model analysis

AIMS

To describe the pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic (PK-PD) characteristics of the direct thrombin inhibitor dabigatran in hip replacement patients by assessing coagulation parameters activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) and ecarin clotting time (ECT), interindividual variability and factors affecting PD responses.

METHODS

BISTRO I patients received oral dabigatran etexilate postsurgery for 6-10 days. Dabigatran plasma concentrations and aPTT/ECT were measured on the day of surgery, on subsequent days and at steady state. PK-PD characteristics of the dabigatran-aPTT/ECT relationships were evaluated using NONMEM V.

RESULTS

The dabigatran concentration-aPTT relationship was described combining a linear and an E(max) model. Mean baseline aPTT was 33.4 s and E(max) (maximum increase in aPTT contributed by the E(max) model) was 26.9 s. The dabigatran concentration needed to attain 50% of maximum effect (EC(50)) was 94.7 ng ml(-1) and the mean slope of the linear concentration-response relationship (SLOP) was 0.0509 s ng(-1) ml(-1). Baseline aPTT and E(max) were highest following surgery and declined with time. The dabigatran concentration-ECT relationship fitted a linear model. Mean baseline ECT was 28 s and decreased with time; 50% of the maximum effect was observed after 2.9 days. SLOP decreased from 0.38 to 0.27 s ng(-1) ml(-1) with a half-life of 1.1 day, indicating greater PD effects on the day of surgery. Interindividual and residual variability was low. Covariates could not explain variability of this model.

CONCLUSIONS

aPTT and ECT prolongation were directly correlated with dabigatran concentrations. Blood coagulation prolongation was most pronounced following surgery. Data suggest that ECT provides a more precise description of the anticoagulant effect than aPTT.

Population modelling of the effect of inogatran, at thrombin inhibitor, on ex vivo coagulation time (APTT) in healthy subjects and patients with coronary artery disease

AIMS

The purpose of this study was to characterize the relationship between the degree of anticoagulation, assessed by APTT, and the plasma concentration of inogatran in healthy subjects and in patients with coronary artery disease.

METHODS

Data from five phase I studies in 78 healthy males and two phase II multicentre studies in 948 patients of both sexes with unstable angina pectoris or non-Q-wave myocardial infarction were evaluated. A total of 3296 pairs of concentration-APTT samples were obtained before, during, and after intravenous infusions of inogatran. Mixed effects modelling was used for population pharmacodynamic analysis of the drug effect and for describing the variability in baseline APTT.

RESULTS

The population mean baseline APTT was 29 s, but large variations between individuals (s.d. 3.6 s) were observed. The variability between studies (1.3 s) and centres (1.8 s) were of less importance, though statistically significant. APTT increased in a nonlinear manner with increasing inogatran concentration and the relationship was well described by a combined linear and Emax model. A significant part of the overall variability could be ascribed to the APTT reagent and equipment used at the different study centres. These method-dependent differences were compensated for by including the lower limit of the normal reference range as a covariate, affecting both baseline and Emax, in the model. For the typical healthy subject and patient, the method-corrected population mean parameters were: APTTbaseline 35 and 31 s, slope 8.0 and 5.8 s x l x micromol(-1), Emax 36 and 34 s, and EC50 0.54 and 0.72 micromol x l(-1), respectively. The model predicted plasma concentration needed to double the APTT from the baseline value was 1.25 and 1.45 micromol x l(-1) in the healthy volunteer and patient, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

The nonlinear relationship between APTT and inogatran concentration in plasma was well described by a combined linear and Emax model. Pooling of data was made possible by incorporating a centre-specific characteristic of the assay method in the model. Patients had lower baseline APTT and appeared to have less pronounced effect of inogatran than young healthy subjects.