Estrogen-progestogen once-a-month injectable contraceptives and serum prolactin

Medroxyprogesterone Acetate in Gender-Affirming Therapy for Transwomen: Results From a Retrospective Study

CONTEXT

Medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) is a widely used progestin in feminizing hormone therapy. However, the side effects and hormonal changes elicited by this drug have never been investigated in the transgender population.

OBJECTIVE

We evaluated the incidence of self-reported effects among transwomen using MPA and this drug's impact on hormonal and metabolic parameters.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS

We retrospectively collected data from 290 follow-up visits (FUVs) of transwomen treated at Rhode Island Hospital from January 2011 to July 2018 (mean duration of therapy 3.4 ± 1.7 years). FUVs followed regimens of estradiol (E) and spironolactone, with MPA (n = 102) or without MPA (n = 188).

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

We assessed the incidence of self-reported effects after MPA treatment. We also compared blood levels of E, testosterone, and various laboratory parameters between MPA and non-MPA groups.

RESULTS

Mean weighted E level was 211 ± 57 pg/mL after MPA treatment and 210 ± 31 pg/mL otherwise; this difference was nonsignificant [t(274) = 0.143, P = 0.886]. Mean weighted testosterone level was 79 ± 18 ng/dL after MPA treatment and 215 ± 29 ng/dL otherwise; testosterone levels were significantly lower in the MPA group [t(122) = 32.4, P < 0.001]. There were minimal changes in other laboratory parameters. Of 39 patients receiving MPA, 26 reported improved breast development and 11 reported decreased facial hair. Five patients experienced mood swings on MPA.

CONCLUSIONS

In our cohort of transwomen, we found minimal side effects, unchanged E levels, and a decline in testosterone associated with MPA, outcomes consistent with feminization. Prospective studies are needed to confirm our findings.

Comparison of two regimens of a monthly injectable contraceptive containing dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide and estradiol enanthate

INTRODUCTION

This study compared two regimens of a monthly injectable contraceptive containing dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide 150 mg and estradiol enanthate 10 mg (Perlutan) over 12 cycles of use.

METHODS

Three hundred sixty-five adolescents were randomized into two groups. The patients in Group 1 received an initial injection of Perlutan on the 1st-5th day of their menstrual cycle and subsequent injections every 30 +/- 3 days, whereas those in Group 2 followed the traditional schedule of administration in which the first injection is administered between Days 7 and 10 of their menstrual cycle and subsequent injections 7-10 days after Day 1 of withdrawal bleeding. This schedule may result in an irregularity in the timing of injections.

RESULTS

No significant difference was found between the two groups regarding tolerability or pregnancy (two in Group 1 and three in Group 2).

CONCLUSION

Monthly administration limits the annual number of injections to a maximum of 12, thus frequently reducing the total annual dose while maintaining efficacy and tolerability similar to those obtained with the traditional regimen.

Injectable contraception. New and existing options

DMPA and MPA/E2C contraception offer women safe, effective, convenient, and reversible birth control choices. The use of DMPA, a 3-month injectable, is characteristically associated with amenorrhea. Lactating women and women in whom contraceptive doses of estrogen are contraindicated can use this progestin-only birth control method. Return of fertility can be delayed in women discontinuing DMPA to become pregnant. In some cases, the use of DMPA also confers important noncontraceptive and therapeutic benefits. A monthly estrogen/progestin injectable contraceptive, MPA/E2C should appeal to women who are concerned about daily pill taking, who prefer regular cycles to amenorrhea, and who find monthly injections acceptable and accessible. As is true for oral contraceptives, MPA/E2C represents an appropriate choice for women who prefer a rapidly reversible contraceptive. Currently, the proposed contraindications for MPA/E2C parallel those for combined oral contraceptives. As MPA/E2C contraception becomes available for American women, clinicians will learn how to best include this new method among the array of contraceptive choices. By individualizing contraceptive selection, counseling, and management approaches based on the relevant behavioral and medical considerations reviewed herein, clinicians can maximize their patients' success with injectable contraceptives. The more innovative that clinicians, family planning agencies, and insurers are in facilitating access to care (including reinjections), the more women will be able to avail themselves of safe, effective, and reversible methods of contraception. In addition to the physician's office or health clinic, other sites at which women might receive contraceptive injections include employee health clinics, college health clinics, or perhaps the pharmacy where the prescription is filled. Self-administration may become an appropriate option for some users of injectable contraception.

Dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide 150 mg + estradiol enantate 10 mg as monthly injectable contraceptives

A survey among users and health personnel participating in the Salvadorian Social Security Institute (ISSS) Family Planning Program revealed interest in including a monthly preparation for injection as a contraceptive method offered by this Institution. The formulation containing dihydroxyprogesterone acetophenide (DHPA) 150 mg + estradiol enantate (E2EN) 10 mg was chosen for conducting an open and prospective study of efficacy and tolerability. Between January 1992 and March 1994, 7054 women were treated with this product for a total of 60010 months. A sample composed of 4505 women treated at this Institution confirmed that average users are young, have one or two children, do not show a particular geographical distribution and choose the monthly injection instead of oral contraceptives as the first contraceptive method or for the puerperium. The study formulation showed a high efficacy (Pearl Index: 0.018) and tolerability (general withdrawal rate throughout the study: 27.09%). The most frequent adverse events included bleeding disorders, headache and mastalgia; their incidence decreased spontaneously from the sixth month (3.9%), reaching 0% after two years. Treatment was discontinued due to adverse events in 3.47% of women. No significant bodyweight or systolic and diastolic blood pressure alterations were observed. Based on these results, the monthly injectable contraceptive was included in the basic product list at ISSS.

Antagonism of oestrogen-induced prolactin release by medroxyprogesterone acetate

Previous studies conducted at our clinic suggested that the administration of hormone replacement therapy (HRT) in postmenopausal women could result in the inhibition of oestrogen-induced prolactin (PRL) release. The aim of this study was to determine how the pituitary function is affected by the sequential addition of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA) to oestrogen replacement therapy. Twenty-one postmenopausal women receiving no other medication were treated with a standard dose (0.625 mg/day) of conjugated equine oestrogens (CEE) for a period of 24 days, plus 5 mg/day MPA added sequentially during the last 12 days of the oestrogen therapy. Blood samples were collected before treatment, during oestrogen and oestrogen-progestogen administration and after cessation of treatment. Follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), 17 beta-oestradiol (E2) and PRL levels were studied. During treatment gonadotrophin concentrations decreased significantly, while after cessation of HRT the levels of FSH and LH increased. These gonadotrophin fluctuations indicated a sharp rise in E2 levels during therapy and a significant decrease during the treatment-free period. PRL levels were found to be higher during CEE therapy, but they fell when patients received CEE in combination with MPA. These observations suggest that the role of progestogens in a variety of experimental and clinically relevant situations needs to be investigated not only as regards their direct action but also their modulation of the effect of oestrogen.

Animal toxicity studies performed for risk assessment of the once-a-month injectable contraceptive Mesigyna

Results from toxicity studies performed for risk assessment of the combined injectable hormonal preparation Mesigyna are reviewed. Both components of Mesigyna, i.e., estradiol valerate (E2Val) and norethisterone enanthate (NET-EN), have been thoroughly investigated as individual compounds and some limited toxicity data have been obtained for the combination. Most findings which were gathered in these studies from different animal species occurred in the gonads, accessory genital and endocrine organs and can be related to the known species-specific pharmacological activity of a typical estrogen or progestin, respectively. No additional or unexpected information which might indicate a possible estrogen/progestin interaction was gained from the administration of the combined preparation to animals. Based on the results from toxicity testing, there were no objections to the long-term therapeutic use of Mesigyna for hormonal contraception. The predictive value of the effects (including the tumorigenicity) observed in the common laboratory animals with regard to human safety is critically discussed, taking the vast amount of previous experience with hormonal contraceptives into consideration. The conclusion is drawn that there is no animal model for safety assessment of sex steroids that adequately represents the human situation. Quantitative extrapolations from animal toxicity findings to humans, therefore, are not possible. Especially, the value of long-term studies and of toxicity studies on estrogen/progestin combinations is put into question. Like endocrine pharmacology studies, the toxicity studies with these steroid hormones are useful for the characterization of the possible endocrine pharmacological profile only.

Pharmacodynamic effects of once-a-month combined injectable contraceptives

The pharmacology and clinical assessment of existing first generation once-a-month combined injectable contraceptives, mainly Deladroxate and Chinese Injectable No. 1, are reviewed. Although these two types of monthly injectables have been used in some million women in China and Latin America, Deladroxate needs indepth re-evaluation of its long-term toxicity and possible accumulation. For injectable No. 1, its disadvantage of being administered on an erratic schedule will cause significant confusion in family planning practice. When used in a strict once-a-month schedule, it is not sufficiently effective for contraception. In order to attain predictable menstrual cycle control as well as high efficacy with a 30-day injection schedule, two improved once-a-month injectable formulations, Cyclofem and Mesigyna, were developed. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic study on estrogenic components suggested that estradiol valerate and cypionate were suitable estrogen esters to give elevated plasma estrogen levels for 7 to 11 days. After a single injection of Cyclofem and Mesigyna, both formulations showed equal contraceptive effect with inhibition of follicle maturation for some 30 days and ovulation, corpus luteum formation for some 60 days. Multicentre studies on the optimization of dosages of progestogens and estrogens in once-a-month injectables confirmed that the full doses of Cyclofem (DMPA 25 mg/estradiol cypionate 5 mg) and Mesigyna (NET-EN 50 mg/estradiol valerate 5 mg) are suitable for large scale clinical trials. Pharmacodynamics and progestogen/estrogen ratio study indicated the importance of not only the absolute amounts of the progestogen and estrogen but also of their ratio. Reduction of estrogen dose resulted in breakthrough ovulation with both Cyclofem and Mesigyna. Also, it is important to note that the second part of the injection cycle is dominated by the progestogen component of both monthly formulations. A longitudinal study indicated that there is no accumulation of norethisterone after 12 months of treatment with NET-EN 50 mg and estradiol valerate 5 mg.

Effects of oophorectomy and hormone replacement therapy on pituitary-gonadal function

The purpose of this study was to determine how oophorectomy and different hormone replacement therapy (HRT) regimens using low doses of medroxyprogesterone acetate (MPA, 2.5 mg/day) influence the pituitary-gonadal axis function. Ninety (90) women, who had had regular menses prior to surgery, completed a 1-year follow-up period. Patients were assigned to 5 groups. The first (n = 16) received 0.625 mg/day conjugated equine oestrogens (CEE) cyclically, the second (n = 20) 50 micrograms day transdermal oestradiol (E2) cyclically and the third (n = 15) 0.625 mg/day CEE continuously. These 3 groups also received 2.5 mg MPA sequentially for the last 12 days of HRT administration. The fourth group (n = 20) received 0.625 mg/day CEE and 2.5 mg/day of MPA continuously, while the fifth (n = 19) constituted a control group. After oophorectomy all patients showed increases in follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels, and decreases in those of E2, oestrone (E1), prolactin (PRL), sex-hormone-binding globulin (SHBG), androstenedione (delta A4) and testosterone (T). No changes were detected in dehydroepiandrosterone sulphate (DHEA-S) levels. After HRT, decreases in FSH, LH and PRL levels and increases in those of E2, E1 and SHBG were observed, but no changes were seen in T, delta A4 or DHEA-S plasma levels. As the differences that were found cannot be attributed to the presence of ovaries, it is reasonable to assume that they were perhaps due to the treatment. All these changes, with the exception of a decrease in PRL levels, are therefore to be expected after HRT.

Hormone replacement therapy and changes on pituitary function

The aim of this study is to know how the pituitary function is affected by several delivery systems of estrogen replacement therapy. 116 menopausal women (54 natural and 62 surgical) were placed into three groups that received replacement therapy and in one control group. We determined prolactine (PRL), gonadotropins and 17 beta-estradiol (E2). We found a decrease in gonadotropin levels in treated patients with a natural menopause, and an increase in gonadotropin levels in the groups treated with conjugated estrogens in surgical menopausal women. 17 beta-E2 was found to be increased in all treated groups, mainly in the continuous therapy group (P less than 0.05). PRL was found to be decreased in patients treated with conjugated estrogens (oophorectomized and not oophorectomized) (P less than 0.05). Although these differences can not be attributed to the presence of the ovaries, we think that they may be the result of the treatment.

Long-acting hormonal contraceptives for women

Following the development and widespread use of oral hormonal contraceptives, it became evident that alternative long-acting delivery systems would be required to improve contraceptive practice in some cultural settings where injectable or subdermal routes of administration are preferred. Nowadays, long-acting contraceptives constitute an important option in family planning services in many parts of the world. Indeed, two long-acting injectable contraceptives containing just a synthetic progestogen (depot-medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) and norethisterone enantate (NET-EN)) have been in clinical practice for more than 20 years. The World Health Organization's (WHO) Special Programme of Research in Human Reproduction, in collaboration with the U.S. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) and universities primarily in developing countries undertook a synthesis programme aimed at producing an improved injectable preparation by developing new derivatives of known steroids. One such compound (levonorgestrel 17-butanoate) is now at the stage of Phase II clinical testing. In addition, the Special Programme has developed and improved once-a-month injectable formulations and assessed their safety and efficacy in different countries worldwide. After large scale clinical testing, at least two progestogen-estrogen combinations have reached the point of introductory trials.