Discriminative stimulus effects of 8-OH-DPAT in pigeons: antagonism studies with the putative 5-HT1A receptor antagonists BMY 7378 and NAN-190

Differential substitution for the discriminative stimulus effects of 3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine and methylphenidate in rats

Previous studies have demonstrated that methylphenidate, MDMA (3,4-methylenedioxymethamphetamine), and other psychostimulants exert stimulant-like subjective effects in humans. Furthermore, MDMA and methylphenidate substitute for the discriminative stimulus effects of psychostimulants, such as amphetamine and cocaine, in animals, which suggests that MDMA and methylphenidate may produce similar discriminative stimulus effects in rats. However, there is no evidence regarding the similarities between the discriminative stimulus effects of MDMA and methylphenidate. To explore this issue, cross-substitution, substitution, and combination tests were conducted in rats that had been trained to discriminate between MDMA (2.5 mg/kg) or methylphenidate (5.0 mg/kg) and saline. In the cross-substitution tests, MDMA and methylphenidate did not cross-substitute for each other. In the substitution test, methamphetamine substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of methylphenidate, but not for those of MDMA. Furthermore, ephedrine and bupropion, which activate dopaminergic and noradrenergic systems, substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of methylphenidate. On the other hand, serotonin (5-HT) receptor agonists 5-HT1A and 5-HT2 fully substituted for the discriminative stimulus effects of MDMA. These results suggest that activation of the noradrenergic and dopaminergic systems is important for the discriminative stimulus effects of methylphenidate, whereas activation of the serotonergic system is crucial for the discriminative stimulus effects of MDMA. Even though MDMA, like psychostimulants, exerts stimulant-like effects, our findings clearly indicate that the discriminative stimulus effects of MDMA are distinctly different from those of other psychostimulants in rats.

Looking beyond 5-HT(3) receptors: a review of the wider role of serotonin in the pharmacology of nausea and vomiting

The concept that 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT; serotonin) is involved in the emetic reflex was revealed using drugs that interfere with its synthesis, storage, release and metabolism ahead of the discovery of selective tools to modulate specific subtypes of receptors. This review comprehensively examines the fundamental role of serotonin in emesis control and highlights data indicating association of 5-HT1-4 receptors in the emetic reflex, whilst leaving open the possibility that 5-HT5-7 receptors may also be involved. The fact that each receptor subtype may mediate both emetic and anti-emetic effects is discussed in detail for the first time. These discussions are made in light of known species differences in emesis control, which has sometimes affected the perception of the translational value of data in regard to the development of novel anti-emetic for use in man.

Differential effects of serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonists on the discriminative stimulus effects of the 5-HT2A receptor agonist 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane in rats and rhesus monkeys

Although many drugs act by indirectly stimulating multiple receptors (e.g., reuptake inhibitors), relatively little is known about interactions between agonism at different receptors. This study compared the effect of serotonin (5-HT)(1A) receptor agonists with the discriminative stimulus effects of the 5-HT(2A) receptor agonist 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM) in rats and rhesus monkeys. Eight rats discriminated 0.56 mg/kg i.p. DOM and responded under a fixed ratio (FR) 10 schedule of food presentation, whereas three rhesus monkeys discriminated 0.32 mg/kg s.c. DOM and responded under an FR 5 schedule of stimulus shock termination. DOM and the 5-HT(2A) receptor agonists 2,5-dimethoxy-4-n-propylthiophenethylamine (2C-T-7) and dipropyltryptamine (DPT), but not the 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino) tetralin hydrochloride (8-OH-DPAT) and 3-chloro-4-fluorophenyl-(4-fluoro-4-([(5-methyl-6-methylaminopyridin-2-ylmethyl) amino) methyl] piperidin-1-yl) methanone (F13714), occasioned responding on the DOM-associated lever in rats and monkeys. Both 8-OH-DPAT and F13714 attenuated the discriminative stimulus effects of DOM in monkeys but not in rats; these effects of 8-OH-DPAT and F13714 were prevented by the 5-HT(1A) receptor antagonist N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridyl)cyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY 100635). DPT and 2C-T-7 enhanced the discriminative stimulus effects of DOM in rats and monkeys in an additive manner. Taken together, the results suggest that the DOM discriminative stimulus is pharmacologically similar and mediated by 5-HT(2A) receptors in rats and monkeys; however, the ability of 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists to modify the effects of DOM is markedly different between these species. These results indicate possible differences in the neurobiology of 5-HT systems that could be important for studying drugs that have multiple mechanisms of action (e.g., reuptake inhibitors that indirectly stimulate multiple receptors).

Discriminative stimulus effects of 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane in rhesus monkeys

Discriminative stimulus effects of 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-methylphenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOM) and related drugs have been studied extensively in rodents, although the generality of those findings across species is not known. The goals of this study were to see whether monkeys could discriminate DOM and to characterize the DOM discriminative stimulus by studying a variety of drugs, including those with hallucinogenic activity in humans. Four rhesus monkeys discriminated between 0.32 mg/kg s.c. DOM and vehicle after an average of 116 (range = 85-166) sessions while responding under a fixed ratio 5 schedule of stimulus shock termination. Increasing doses of DOM occasioned increased responding on the drug lever with the training dose occasioning DOM-lever responding for up to 2 h. The serotonin (5-HT)(2A/2C) receptor antagonists ritanserin and ketanserin, the 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonist (+)2,3-dimethoxyphenyl-1-[2-(4-piperidine)-methanol] (MDL100907), and its (-)stereoisomer MDL100009 [(-)2,3-dimethoxyphenyl-1-[2-(4-piperidine)-methanol], but not haloperidol, completely blocked the discriminative stimulus effects of DOM. Quipazine as well as several drugs with hallucinogenic activity in humans, including (+)lysergic acid diethylamide, (-)DOM, and 2,5-dimethoxy-4-(n)-propylthiophenethylamine (2C-T-7), occasioned DOM-lever responding. The kappa-opioid receptor agonists U-50488 and salvinorin A (a hallucinogen) did not exert DOM-like effects and neither did ketamine, phencyclidine, amphetamine, methamphetamine, cocaine, morphine, yohimbine, fenfluramine, 8-hydroxy-2-(dipropylamino)tetralin hydrobromide (8-OH-DPAT), or (+/-)-2-(N-phenethyl-N-1'-propyl)amino-5-hydroxytetralin hydrochloride (N-0434). These data confirm in nonhuman primates a prominent role for 5-HT(2A) receptors in the discriminative stimulus effects of some drugs with hallucinogenic activity in humans. The failure of another drug with hallucinogenic activity (salvinorin A) to substitute for DOM indicates that different classes of hallucinogens exert qualitatively different discriminative stimulus effects in nonhumans.

Further evidence that the discriminative stimulus properties of indorenate are mediated by 5-HT 1A/1B/2C receptors

Indorenate (5-methoxytryptamine beta-methylcarboxylate, INDO) is a serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) agonist that has affinity for 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) receptors. Unlike other anxiolytics such as 5-HT receptor agonists, INDO may not share tolerance or dependency with the benzodiazepine anxiolytics. It has been reported that the discriminative stimulus properties of 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) agonists, but not those of 5-HT(3/4) agonists, generalize to INDO. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to obtain further evidence on the differential involvement of 5-HT(1A/1B/2C) receptors in the discriminative stimulus properties of INDO by evaluating its interactions with antagonists of the 5-HT(1A), 5-HT(1B), 5-HT(2C), and 5-HT(3/4) receptor subtypes. Rats were trained to discriminate INDO from saline in a conditioned taste aversion paradigm. For Group D(+)S(-), administration of INDO signalled that saccharin flavour was followed by LiCl, while injection of vehicle signalled safe consumption of saccharin solution. Group D(-)S(+) had the contingencies reversed. After this training, rats had generalization tests where INDO administration was preceded by different doses of the following antagonists: WAY100635 (5-HT(1A)), NAN190 (5-HT(1A)), methiothepin (5-HT(1A/1B/2C)), GR127935 (5-HT(1B/1D)), ketanserin (5-HT(2A/2C)), ritanserin (5-HT(2C/2A)), mesulergine (5-HT(2C/2A)), metergoline (5-HT(2C/2A)), SB206553 (5-HT(2B/2C)), and tropisetron (5-HT(3/4)). In Group D(+)S(-), the order of potency to block the discriminative stimulus properties of INDO was WAY100635>ketanserin>ritanserin>GR127935>mesulergine congruent with SB206553>metergoline>methiothepin>NAN190, while in Group D(-)S(+), the order was WAY100635>GR127935>ketanserin>ritanserin>mesulergine congruent with SB206553>metergoline>methiothepin>NAN190. Tropisetron did not produce any alteration of the discriminative control by INDO. These results suggest that the discriminative signal of INDO is mediated by 5-HT(1A/2C/1B) receptors and that blockade of any of its components produces a degradation of its discriminative effects.

Discriminative stimulus properties of indorenate, a 5-HT1A, 5-HT1B and 5-HT2C agonist: a study in rats

Indorenate (INDO), initially described as an antihypertensive agent, also has some effects on behaviour, with anxiolytic and anorectic actions being reported. The aim of the present experiment was to examine the activity of INDO at the behavioural level at various serotonin (5-hydroxytryptamine, 5-HT) receptor sites by comparing its stimulus properties with those of other 5-HT receptor agonists and by examining its interactions with some 5-HT antagonists. Rats were trained to discriminate between 10.0 mg/kg INDO (administered intraperitoneally (90 min before the start of the session) from saline. A Fixed Ratio 10 (FR10) schedule of reinforcement was in effect in each drug condition. During generalization test sessions, the discrimination index (DI, responses to drug lever/responses to drug + saline lever) was calculated from the responses emitted before the first reinforcer of the session. DI was a function of the dose of INDO employed. Generalization to the discriminative stimulus properties of INDO was observed with the 5-HT1A receptor agonist 8-OH-DPAT (1.0 mg/kg produced 90% generalization) and the 5-HT(1B/2C) receptor agonist 1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl) piperazine (TFMPP) (3.0 mg/kg produced up to 75% generalization). Yohimbine (5.6 mg/kg), buspirone (1.0 mg/kg), 6-chloro-2-(1-piperaziny)pyrazine (1.0 mg/kg) and m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP) (1.0 mg/kg) induced a DI of 70%, 50% and 48% and 55%, respectively. In generalization tests, ritanserin (0.01-1.0 mg/kg) induced saline-like responding. NAN-190 (3.0 mg/kg), a 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, was able to reduce the DI of INDO to 50%. Although the 5-HT(2C/2A) receptor antagonists cinanserin (10.0 mg/kg) and metergoline (0.3 mg/kg) were able to reduce the stimulus properties of INDO to 60% and 30%, respectively, only ritanserin (1.0 mg/kg) reduced the stimulus properties of INDO to 25% with a clear dose-response relationship. The results suggest that INDO acts as an agonist at 5-HT1A receptor sites, but its activity at 5-HT(1B/2C) receptor sites also contributes to its discriminative function.

Discriminative stimulus properties of eltoprazine in the pigeon

Twelve pigeons were successfully (ED50 = 2.4 mg/kg p.o.) trained to discriminate the 5-HT(1A/B) receptor agonist eltoprazine (5.0 mg/kg p.o.) from its vehicle in a fixed-ratio (FR)30 two-key operant drug discrimination procedure. Tests for generalization and antagonism showed that 5-HT1A receptor agonists, such as 8-OH-DPAT (8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin) (66.7%), flesinoxan (72.7%), buspirone (58.3%), and ipsapirone (36.4%) only partially substituted for the eltoprazine cue. Compounds with mixed agonistic action at 5-HT1 receptors, completely (> or = 80%) [(eltoprazine; TFMPP (1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl) piperazine (ED50 = 7.68 mg/kg) and RU 24969 (5-methoxy-3-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl-1H-indole) (ED50 = 15.8 mg/kg)] substituted for eltoprazine; whereas m-CPP (1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazine) did not. The selective 5-HT reuptake inhibitor fluvoxamine partially (44%) substituted for the eltoprazine cue. The 5-HT1A receptor antagonist NAN-190 (1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-[4-(2-phtalimido)butyl]piperazine) fully blocked the eltoprazine cue. Both (+/-)-pindolol and (+/-)-propranolol showed partial antagonism of the eltoprazine cue (66.7 and 50.0%, respectively). (+/-)-Pindolol also showed partial substitution (50%) for the eltoprazine cue, but NAN-190 and (+/-)propranolol did not. It is concluded that the discriminatory stimulus properties of eltoprazine in the pigeon are mediated by 5-HT1A and 5-HT1B receptors.

Differentiation of 5-HT1A receptor ligands by drug discrimination

Pigeons were trained to discriminate 0.64 mg/kg (high dose) of 8-OH-DPAT (8-hydroxy-(2-di-n-propylamino)tetralin) from saline or were retrained to discriminate 0.16 mg/kg (low dose) of 8-OH-DPAT from saline. This resulted in a decrease of the ED50 for recognition of the 8-OH-DPAT cue from 0.14 to 0.04 mg/kg. Partial agonists for the 5-HT1A receptor (e.g., buspirone) were generalized fully in the low dose condition, but only partially in the high dose condition. Full antagonists, such as N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY-100635), antagonized the 8-OH-DPAT cue in both groups without producing generalization in either group. (-)-Pindolol produced full generalization in the low dose group, but antagonized the high dose stimulus cue. The behavioral effects of other compounds with 5-HT1A receptor activities (4-iodo-N-[2-[4-(methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-pyridinyl-benz ami de hydrochloride (p-MPPI): (-)-1-(1H-indol-4-yloxy)-3-(cyclohexylamino)-2-propanol maleate ((-)-LY206130); racemic pindolol and idazoxan) also differed between groups. Comparing results obtained using differing training doses in the drug discrimination paradigm simplifies determination of the full agonist, partial agonist, or antagonist properties of compounds.

The putative 5-HT1A receptor antagonist DU125530 blocks the discriminative stimulus of the 5-HT1A receptor agonist flesinoxan in pigeons

Twelve homing pigeons were trained to discriminate the 5-HT1A receptor agonist flesinoxan (0.25 mg/kg p.o.) from its vehicle in a fixed ratio (FR) 30 two-key operant drug discrimination procedure. Tests for generalization and antagonism showed that compounds with agonistic action at the 5-HT1A receptor, such as 8-OH-DPAT (8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin), buspirone and ipsapirone all substituted for the flesinoxan cue. Compounds with mixed agonistic action at the 5-HT(1A/1B) receptor fully (eltoprazine) or partially (RU24969 (5-methoxy-3-(1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl-1H-indole)) substituted for flesinoxan. TFMPP (1-(3-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine) and mCPP (1-(3-chlorophenyl)piperazine), both acting at the 5-HT(1B/2C) receptor, did not substitute for flesinoxan, neither did the selective 5-HT re-uptake inhibitor fluvoxamine. The results of the antagonism tests showed that the 5-HT1A receptor antagonists NAN-190 (1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-[4-(2-phthalimido)butyl]piperazine), WAY 100635 ((N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl)cyclo-he xane-carboxamide) and the newly developed DU125530 (2-[4-[4-(7-chloro-2,3-dihydro-1,4-benzodioxin-5-yl)-1-piperazinyl ]butyl]-1,2-benzisothiazol-3(2H)-one-1,1-dioxide) fully (more than 80%) blocked the flesinoxan cue without having substantial effects when given alone. WAY100135 (N-tert-butyl-3-(4-(2-methoxyphenyl)piperazine-1-yl)-2-phenylpropanamide ), (+/-)-pindolol and (S)-UH-301 ((S)-5-fluoro-8-hydroxy-2-(dipropylamino)-tetralin) all partially antagonized the flesinoxan cue. However, both WAY100135 as well as (+/-)-pindolol also partially substituted for flesinoxan in generalization tests. NAN190, (S)-UH-301, WAY100635 and DU125530 were without any activity in the generalization test at the doses tested. The putative 5-HT1A receptor antagonist S15535 (4-benzodioxan-5-yl) 1-(indan-2-yl)piperazine) was identified as a full agonist in the present procedure. Taken together these results suggest that the flesinoxan cue in pigeons is mediated by the 5-HT1A receptor and that DU125530 acts as a full antagonist on the 5-HT1A receptor.

Serotonin inhibition of adenylate cyclase in human platelet membranes; relation to 5-HT-1A receptor-mediated activity

Serotonin inhibited both basal and forskolin-stimulated adenylate cyclase activity in human platelet membranes by approx. 30%, with an EC50 of 54 nM. Addition of NaCl to the assay medium reduced the degree of inhibition. 5-carboxamidotryptamine (5-CT) behaved as a full agonist in this system (EC50 of 5.4 nM) and BMY 7378 as a partial agonist (inducing 19% inhibition); the putative 5-HT-1a receptor agonists metergoline, spiroxatrine and MDL 73005 were inactive. The 5-HT-1a receptor antagonists metitepin and NAN-190 behaved as antagonists with Kb or Ki values of 11.2 and 1.17 nM, respectively. Spiperone behaved as a partial antagonist only. Epinephrine and 5-HT produced convergent, non-additive inhibition of both basal and forskolin-stimulated cyclase.

Antiemetic effects of 5-HT1A agonists in the pigeon

Ditolyguanidine (DTG) induced a dose-dependent emetic response in pigeons, with 100% of the birds vomiting after 5.6 mg/kg. Retching and vomiting originally induced by DTG could be conditioned to the test situation. Both the unconditioned and conditioned emetic responses were dose-dependently blocked by 8-hydroxy-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT) and LY228729, agonists at the 5-HT1A subtype of serotonin receptor, but not by the 5-HT3, antagonist tropisetron. Higher doses (0.25-0.5 mg/kg) of tropisetron exhibited intrinsic emetic activity which could also be prevented by 8-OH-DPAT. NAN-190, a putative 5-HT1A partial agonist, produced both an antiemetic response when administered before DTG and also attenuated the antiemetic effects of 8-OH-DPAT. Pentobarbital blocked the conditioned, but not the unconditioned DTG-induced emesis. These results support the possibility that 5-HT1A agonists exhibit antiemetic activity against a broad range of emetic stimuli, including conditioned vomiting which is usually resistant to pharmacological attenuation.

Involvement of 5-HT2C receptors in mediating the discriminative stimulus properties of m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP)

Rats were trained to discriminate the 5-HT receptor agonist m-chlorophenylpiperazine (mCPP; 1 mg/kg) from saline using a two-lever, water-reinforced drug discrimination task. The antidepressant trazodone (1-8 mg/kg), the 5-HT1B/2C receptor agonists 1-(m-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP; 0.25-1 mg/kg) and MK 212 (0.125-1 mg/kg), and the mixed 5-HT1A/B receptor agonist RU 24969 (0.25-2 mg/kg) substituted fully for mCPP. The 5-HT2A/2C receptor agonists 1-(2,5-dimethoxy-4-iodophenyl)-2-aminopropane (DOI; 0.25-1 mg/kg) and d-lysergic acid diethylamide (LSD; 0.02-0.08 mg/kg) and the 5-HT releaser fenfluramine (0.5-2 mg/kg) also mimicked mCPP. Agonists selective for the 5-HT1A or 5-HT3 receptor or the 5-HT reuptake site produced saline-lever responding. The ergoline derivative mesulergine (0.5-4 mg/kg) produced a partial agonist/antagonist profile. The 5-HT1/2 receptor antagonist metergoline (0.125-1 mg/kg) completely blocked the mCPP cue whereas the 5-HT2A/2C receptor antagonists ketanserin and LY 53857 as well as all other 5-HT receptor antagonists failed to block the mCPP cue. The dopamine receptor antagonists SCH 23390 and haloperidol were also ineffective mCPP antagonists. Following pretreatment with the 5-HT synthesis inhibitor p-chlorophenylalanine (pCPA; 100 mg/kg/day) for 3 consecutive days, the discriminability of low doses of mCPP increased, whereas the effects of fenfluramine decreased. The present results suggest that the discriminative stimulus effects of mCPP in rats are mediated primarily by postsynaptic 5-HT2C receptors.

Anxiolytic and antidepressant mechanisms of 5-HT1A drugs in the pigeon: contributions from behavioral studies

The discovery that compounds acting through 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) receptor subtypes can produce anxiolytic and/or antidepressant therapeutic effects in humans has resulted in considerable interest in the role of the 5-HT receptor system in both anxiety and depressive disorders. Because many of the clinically efficacious 5-HT1A anxiolytic drugs are either ineffective or produce inconsistent results in traditional or standard types of preclinical punishment or conflict procedures with rodents and other nonhuman mammals, there is considerable need for alternative behavioral assays sensitive to and selective for these compounds. In contrast to data with nonhuman mammals, 5-HT1A drugs are quite effective in pigeons studied under a punishment procedure. This paper reviews the use of the pigeon conflict procedure as a method for the detection and analysis of potential anxiolytic drugs acting through 5-HT1A receptors. Additionally, recent studies, also with the pigeon, have indicated that, in contrast to the rat, it is possible to establish an antidepressant such as imipramine as a discriminative stimulus, and then to use this procedure to evaluate the neuropharmacological bases for the behavioral and, presumably, therapeutic actions of these drugs. Using the drug discrimination procedure, it has been possible to examine a number of selective compounds that substitute for imipramine, thereby clarifying specific substrates for the antidepressant activity of this and related drugs. The pigeon promises to be a useful species in the pharmacological analyses of novel anxiolytic drugs and provides new approaches to the analysis and understanding of traditional as well as the more recently introduced antidepressant drugs.

Antiemetic effects of flesinoxan in cats: comparisons with 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin

The antiemetic effects of flesinoxan were evaluated following s.c. administration in cats. Flesinoxan produced a dose-dependent suppression of motion sickness and also reduced xylazine-induced emesis at higher doses. Flesinoxan had a short latency to onset and may have a brief duration of action. It was slightly more potent that 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), in contrast to their relative potencies on most other in vivo measures. High doses of both agonists produced defensive behavior as a result of 5-HT1A receptor stimulation. (-)-Propranolol, which previously reduced 8-OH-DPAT suppression of feline motion sickness, failed to reduce the antiemetic effect of flesinoxan. The dose of 3 mg/kg of NAN-190 (1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-[4-(2-phthalimido)butyl]piperazine) produced a slight decrease in motion sickness and added to the suppression of motion sickness by low doses of flesinoxan via an uncertain mechanism. It also reduced the antiemetic effect of higher doses of flesinoxan. In contrast, NAN-190 produced additive antiemetic effects when combined with 8-OH-DPAT and little if any reduction. NAN-190 reduced the defensiveness produced by both flesinoxan and 8-OH-DPAT. Phentolamine and sulpiride reduced neither the antiemetic effect nor the defensive behavior produced by flesinoxan, thus ruling out a role for alpha-adrenoceptors and dopamine D2 receptors. Flesinoxan exerted a broad spectrum antiemetic effect by an action at 5-HT1A receptors as does 8-OH-DPAT, but differed in its response to putative 5-HT1A receptor antagonists.

Anti-conflict effect of 5-HT1A agonists in rats: a new model for evaluating anxiolytic-like activity

A new conflict procedure was developed to study the potential anti-punishment effects of 5-HT( 1A) agonists as compared to diazepam. In this paradigm, the opportunity existed for rats to choose during punished periods between immediate, punished reinforcement and delayed, non-punished reinforcement. The results confirm that, for non-sedative doses (1 mg/kg), diazepam increases the number of punished responses. Furthermore, the present paradigm seems sensitive for the detection of 5-HT(1A) activity. Buspirone, gepirone, ipsapirone, zalospirone and 8-OH-DPAT increased responding for immediate but punished reinforcement. 1-(2-pyrimidinyl)piperazine, the common metabolite of the azapirones, does not participate in their anti-conflict effect. NAN 190, a 5-HT(1A) antagonist, was shown to block the 5-HT(1A) agonists. The findings of the present study suggest that benzodiazepines and 5-HT( 1A) agonists reduce the capacity to tolerate delays in reward. Abnormality in serotonin systems may be associated with poor impulse control.

Neuropharmacology of 5-hydroxytryptamine1B/D receptor ligands

In spite of a lack of compounds acting selectively at the 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT)1B and 5-HT1D receptor subtypes, by cross-relating the available data, this review attempts to tentatively assign behavioural and other in vivo correlates of these receptor subtypes. In addition, a summary of data from microdialysis studies is included to develop an integrated view. Finally, a suggestion is made as to the possible pathophysiological consequences of 5-HT1D receptor dysfunction in man.

Antagonism of the stimulus effects of yohimbine and 8-hydroxydipropylaminotetralin

Stimulus control was established in rats using either 8-hydroxy-2-[di-n-propylamino]tetralin (DPAT) (0.2 mg/kg) or yohimbine (3 mg/kg). Tests were then conducted with purported antagonists at 5-hydroxytryptamine1A (5-HT1A) receptors. Drugs studied were NAN-190, [+/-]-pindolol, and [-]-alprenolol. In addition, each drug was characterized in terms of its affinity for 5-HT1A and alpha 2-adrenoceptors by means of radioligand binding techniques. None of the antagonists tested provided complete blockade of the stimulus effects of either DPAT or yohimbine. However, [+/-]-pindolol produced a statistically significant intermediate degree of antagonism of both DPAT and yohimbine. The affinities of DPAT, yohimbine, and NAN-190 for the 5-HT1A and alpha 2-adrenergic receptors, respectively, were sufficiently high to lead to some ambiguity of interpretation of the behavioral data. However, the results with [+/-]-pindolol, which has high affinity for the 5-HT1A receptor (34 nM) and negligible affinity for the alpha 2-adrenoceptor (24,600 nM), indicate that a significant component of yohimbine-induced stimulus control is mediated by the 5-HT1A receptor.

Neurochemical effects of 5-HT1 receptor ligands in pigeons

Pigeon cerebrospinal fluid was assayed for 5-HT (5-hydroxytryptamine) and catecholamine metabolites after systemic drug injection. The 5-HT1-like receptor agonists 8-hydroxy-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT), 5-methoxy-3(1,2,3,6-tetrahydropyridin-4-yl)1H indole (RU 24969), 1-(m-trifluoromethylphenyl)piperazine (TFMPP), and 1-(3-chlorphenyl)piperazine (mCPP) decreased levels of the 5-HT metabolite 5-hydroxyindoleacetic acid (5-HIAA) without altering other metabolites. 5-HIAA decreases occurred at doses of 8-OH-DPAT and RU 24969 that have anti-conflict effects in pigeons, whereas TFMPP and mCPP decreased 5-HIAA only at behaviorally disruptive doses. The novel compound 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-(4-(2-phthalimido)butyl)piperazine (NAN-190), a putative 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, did not affect 5-HIAA, but attenuated the decreases produced by the agonists. NAN-190 and the alpha 1-adrenoceptor antagonist prazosin increased levels of the norepinephrine metabolite 3-methoxy-4-hydroxyphenylethylene glycol and had additive effects when co-administered. The rank order of potency in inhibiting [3H]8-OH-DPAT binding in pigeon cerebrum was 8-OH-DPAT = RU 24969 > NAN-190 >> mCPP > TFMPP. The results support suggestions that decreased 5-HT neurotransmission underlies the anxiolytic-like effects of 5-HT1A receptor agonists in pigeons.