Mechanism of interaction between neuropeptide Y and angiotensin II in the rabbit femoral artery

The sympathetic nervous system in healthy and hypertensive pregnancies: physiology or pathology?

NEW FINDINGS

What is the topic of this review? Sympathoexcitation in both healthy and hypertensive pregnancies, and concurrent adaptations along the neurovascular cascade. What advances does it highlight? Known and plausible adaptations along the neurovascular cascade which may offset elevated MSNA in normotensive pregnancy while also highlighting knowledge gaps regarding understudied pathways.

ABSTRACT

The progression from conception through to the postpartum period represents an extraordinary period of physiological adaptation in the mother to support the growth and development of the fetus. Healthy, normotensive human pregnancies are associated with striking increases in both plasma volume and sympathetic nerve activity, yet normal or reduced blood pressure; it represents a unique period of apparent healthy sympathetic hyperactivity. However, how this normal blood pressure is achieved in the face of sympathoexcitation, and the mechanisms responsible for this increased activity are unclear. Importantly, sympathetic activation has been implicated in hypertensive pregnancy disorders - the leading causes of maternal-fetal morbidity and mortality in the developed world. An understudied link between pregnancy and the development of maternal hypertension may lie in the sympathetic nervous system regulation of blood pressure. This brief review presents the latest data on sympathoexcitation in both healthy and hypertensive pregnancies, and concurrent adaptations along the neurovascular cascade.

Splanchnic and systemic vasodilation: the experimental models

Experimental models are a sine qua non condition for unraveling the specific components and mechanisms contributing to vascular dysfunction and arterial vasodilation in portal hypertension. Moreover, a careful selection of the type of animal model, vascular bed, and methodology is crucial for any investigation of this issue. In this review, some critical aspects related to experimental models in portal hypertension and the techniques applied are highlighted. In addition, a detailed summary of the mechanisms of arterial vasodilation in portal hypertension is presented. First, humoral and endothelial vasodilators, predominantly nitric oxide but also carbon monoxide and endothelium-derived hyperpolarizing factor, and others are discussed. Second, time course and potential stimuli triggering and/or perpetuating splanchnic vasodilation are delineated. Finally, a brief general overview of vascular smooth muscle signaling sets the stage for a discussion on cotransmission, receptor desensitization, and the observed impairment in vasoconstrictor-induced smooth muscle contraction in the splanchnic and systemic circulation during portal hypertension.

Frequency and pattern dependence of adrenergic and purinergic vasoconstriction in rat skeletal muscle arteries

Sympathetic nerves fire in bursts followed by brief periods of quiescence. Periods of quiescence may be a valuable part of coding for different neurotransmitters. We compared adrenergic- and non-adrenergic-mediated vasoconstriction with repeating burst patterns versus constant frequency stimulation. Seventeen rats were killed, and the femoral arteries dissected out and mounted in organ tissue baths at 37 degrees C and pH 7.4. Field stimulation was applied to artery rings from five rats at constant frequencies of 2-6 Hz for 144 impulses. In 12 rats, artery rings were stimulated with two burst pattern protocols consisting of repeating pairs, triplets, quadruplets or sextuplets performed using either 8 or 30 Hz as the instantaneous frequency for a total of 144 impulses. All protocols were repeated with the P2 purinergic antagonist pyridoxal-phosphate-6-azophenyl-2'4'-disulphonic acid (PPADs; 0.42 m) or the alpha(1)-antagonist prazosin (1.59 microM). Tension was decreased by the addition of the P2 antagonist PPADs (P < 0.05). Prazosin abolished tension at all constant frequencies (P < 0.05). P2 and alpha(1)-antagonism decreased tension with 8 and 30 Hz burst pattern field stimulation. However, the magnitude of decrease in tension with prazosin was less with burst patterns compared to the same average constant frequencies (P < 0.05). It appears that P2X receptors and alpha(1)-receptors in the femoral artery are sensitive to frequency and patterns of electrical stimulation.

alpha(2)-adrenoceptor and NPY receptor-mediated contractions of porcine isolated blood vessels: evidence for involvement of the vascular endothelium

1. Enhanced contractions to the alpha(2)-adrenoceptor agonist UK14304 and neuropeptide Y (NPY) in the porcine ear artery can be uncovered by pharmacological manipulation. The aim of this study was to determine whether similar pharmacological manipulation can uncover enhanced contractions in the porcine splenic artery, and to determine whether the endothelium modulates these responses. 2. UK14304 (0.3 microM) and NPY (0.1 microM) produced small contractions of the porcine splenic artery. After pre-contraction of the tissue with U46619, followed by relaxation with forskolin, the responses to both UK14304 and NPY were enhanced. Enhanced contractions to both UK14304 and NPY were also obtained after relaxation with SNP. These results demonstrate that, as in the porcine ear artery, alpha(2)-adrenoceptors and NPY receptors are able to produce enhanced contractile responses through both adenylyl cyclase-dependent and -independent signal transduction pathways. 3. Removal of the endothelium had no significant effect on responses to UK14304 either alone or in the presence of U46619 and forskolin in the porcine splenic artery. On the other hand, responses to UK14304 after relaxation with SNP were reduced after endothelium-denudation in both the porcine splenic artery and ear artery. Similar results were obtained with NPY in the porcine ear artery. 4. In conclusion, enhanced contractile responses to UK14304 and NPY in the porcine splenic artery can be uncovered using methods similar to those employed in the porcine ear artery. Under certain conditions the responses to both agents are modulated by the endothelium. These data highlight further the similarities in the signal transduction pathways used by both alpha(2)-adrenoceptors and NPY receptors to induce vasoconstriction.

A study of NPY-mediated contractions of the porcine isolated ear artery

Enhanced contractions of the porcine isolated ear artery by the alpha2-adrenoceptor agonist UK14304 are uncovered by pharmacological manipulation. As both neuropeptide Y (NPY) receptors and alpha2-adrenoceptors are negatively-coupled to adenylyl cyclase in this tissue, we determined whether NPY is also able to produce an enhanced contraction in the same tissue, under the same conditions. NPY (0.1 microM) produced a small contraction of porcine isolated ear arteries which was 5.1+/-0.8% of the response to 60 mM KCl (n = 14). An enhanced NPY response was uncovered if the tissue was pre-contracted with 0.1 microM U46619, and relaxed back to baseline with 1-2 microM forskolin before the addition of NPY (49.8+/-5.3%, n = 14). Forskolin (1 microM) stimulated cyclic AMP accumulation in porcine ear artery segments in the presence of 0.1 microM U46619 and 1 mM isobutylmethylxanthine (IBMX), NPY (0.1 microM) inhibited this response by 40%, but had no effect on basal levels of cyclic AMP. An enhanced response to 0.1 microM NPY was also obtained after pre-contraction with 0.1 microM U46619 and relaxation with either SNP (28.9+/-5.7%, n = 14), or dibutyryl cyclic AMP (21.2+/-4.6%, n = 14). This indicates that at least part of the enhanced response to NPY is independent of the agonist's ability to inhibit adenylyl cyclase. In conclusion, an enhanced contraction to NPY in the porcine isolated ear artery can be obtained by prior pharmacological manipulation. The enhanced responses are mediated through adenylyl cyclase-dependent and independent pathways similar to those reported for alpha2-adrenoceptors in this preparation.

Human neuropeptide Y potentiates alpha1-adrenergic blood pressure responses in vivo

Human neuropeptide Y (hNPY) potentiates the postjunctional vasoconstrictor effects of alpha1-adrenoceptor agonists in animals and in human hand veins in vivo. We therefore hypothesized that such an interaction might also occur in the human arterial bed. With the present single-blind cross-over study in 12 healthy volunteers, the effect of subpressor doses of hNPY on the blood pressure response to alpha1-adrenoceptor stimulation was evaluated. Dose-response curves were constructed to intravenously infuse phenylephrine with and without coinfusion with two different doses of hNPY (1.4 and 14.3 pmol . kg-1 . min-1). Blood pressure, heart rate, and forearm blood flow were recorded, and plasma hNPY was determined. During infusion of the higher hNPY dose, which increased hNPY from 24.0 +/- 12.0 to 495.1 +/- 12.6 pmol/l, blood pressure curves were 2.4-fold shifted toward lower phenylephrine dose rates (P < 0.001). Forearm vascular resistance showed a similar trend, whereas the counterregulatory decrease of heart rate was similar in both groups. In contrast, the lower hNPY dose rate producing a fourfold increase in hNPY concentrations did not modify the response to phenylephrine. This in vivo study in humans demonstrates that hNPY induced potentiating effects on alpha1-adrenergic constriction also in the systemic arterial circulation and suggests that circulating hNPY may participate in the control of vascular tone.

Role of endothelium in the endothelin-1-mediated potentiation of the norepinephrine response in the aorta of hypertensive rats

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the role of the endothelium in the functional interaction between endothelin-1 and norepinephrine in the contractile response of aortas from Wistar-Kyoto (WKY) rats and spontaneously hypertensive rats (SHR).

METHODS

Thoracic aorta rings with and without endothelium from SHR and from WKY rats were suspended in an organ bath to record the isometric tension. After an equilibration period of 120 min, the preparations with and without endothelin-1 were subjected to single and cumulative additions of norepinephrine in different experiments. To characterize the mechanisms involved in the interaction between endothelin-1 and norepinephrine, the aortic rings were pretreated with a cyclooxygenase pathway inhibitor (piroxicam, SO29548), an inhibitor of NO synthase [NG-nitro-L-arginine (NLA)], or selective endothelin receptor blockers (BQ-123 or BQ-788). In some experiments we examined the contractile responses to norepinephrine in aortas pretreated either with angiotensin II (AII) or with U46619, an agonist of prostaglandin H2-thromboxane A2 receptors. Finally, we examined the effect of the combination of calcium-entry blockade by administration of nifedipine and treatment with either endothelin-1 or U46619 on the norepinephrine reactivity.

RESULTS

Administration of 3 x 10(-10) mol/l endothelin-1 potentiated the contractile response to norepinephrine in SHR aortas with endothelium, irrespective of whether they had been treated with NLA. No endothelin-1-mediated enhancement of the response to norepinephrine was observed in SHR denuded rings and in untreated and NLA-treated WKY rat aortas. All did not affect the response to norepinephrine in SHR rings with endothelium. The amplification by endothelin-1 of the response to (1-100) x 10(-9) mol/l norepinephrine was abolished by blockade of the cyclooxygenase pathway with piroxicam or SO29548. In WKY rat and SHR denuded aortas, 10(-8) mol/l U46619 potentiated the contractile responses to norepinephrine. Administration of 3 x 10(-6) mol/l BQ-123 abolished the increase in reactivity to norepinephrine evoked by endothelin-1 in intact SHR aorta, whereas 3 x 10(-6) mol/l BQ-788 failed to modify this potentiating effect. Administration of 10(-8) mol/l nifedipine inhibited the potentiation of the norepinephrine-induced contractions evoked both by endothelin-1 in SHR aortic rings with endothelium and by U46619 in SHR denuded rings.

CONCLUSION

Our results show that a low concentration of endothelin-1 induced potentiation of the contractile response to norepinephrine in SHR aortas but not in WKY rat aortas. This response was endothelium-dependent. Furthermore, our study affords functional arguments that both endothelial and smooth muscle pathways are involved in the potentiating interaction. We propose that endothelin-1 stimulates the production of endothelium- and cyclooxygenase-generated vasoconstrictor factors, which in turn may serve directly as priming stimuli at the vascular smooth muscle level, to activate the Ca(2+)-signal pathway and consequently to increase locally the vascular sensitivity to norepinephrine.

Effects of noradrenaline and neuropeptide Y on rat mesenteric microvessel contraction

We have studied the contractile effects of the sympathetic transmitter noradrenaline and its cotransmitter neuropeptide Y (NPY) given alone and in combination on isolated rat mesenteric resistance vessels (200-300 microns diameter). Noradrenaline and NPY each concentration-dependently contracted rat mesenteric microvessels (EC50 approximately equal to 800 nM and 10 nM, respectively), but noradrenaline caused considerably greater maximal effects than NPY (14.3 mN vs. 3.5 mN). A low antagonistic potency of yohimbine indicated that the response to noradrenaline did not involve alpha 2-adrenoceptors, and the subtype-selective antagonists 5-methylurapidil, tamsulosin and chloroethylclonidine indicated mediation via an alpha 1A-adrenoceptor. Shallow Schild regressions for prazosin and 5-methylurapidil indicated that an alpha 1-adrenoceptor subtype with relatively low prazosin affinity might additionally be involved. Studies with the NPY analogues PYY, [Leu31, Pro34] NPY and NPY18-36 demonstrated that NPY acted via a Y1 NPY receptor. In addition to its direct vasoconstricting effects NPY also lowered the noradrenaline EC50 but did not appreciably affect maximal noradrenaline responses indicating possible potentiation. The potentiating NPY response occurred with similar agonist potency as the direct contractile NPY effects and also via a Y1 NPY receptor. The Ca2+ entry blocker nitrendipine (300 nM) reduced direct contractile responses to noradrenaline and NPY but did not affect the potentiation response to NPY.