Role of 5-HT1A receptors in the ability of mixed 5-HT1A receptor agonist/dopamine D2 receptor antagonists to inhibit methylphenidate-induced behaviors in rats

Evaluation of the potential of antipsychotic agents to induce catalepsy in rats: assessment of a new, commercially available, semi-automated instrument

Haloperidol induced catalepsy was determined using the classic bar test and a new MED Associates Catalepsy Test Chamber instrument. The dose that produced an adverse effect in 50% of rats (AED50) for haloperidol was calculated using the instrument data as 0.29 mg/kg. Hand scoring of the video recordings gave AED50 values of 0.30 and 0.31 mg/kg, both well within the 95% CL of the instrument data. Clozapine was also evaluated and catalepsy was not detected up to 40 mg/kg. No significant difference was found between the instrument and hand scoring data. The instrument was useful for testing haloperidol and clozapine, relieving much of the tedium and variability experienced without its use. It was especially valuable at measuring shorter time periods, where the researcher cannot react as quickly. Finally, olanzapine was also evaluated. However, clenched forepaws and hind paws prevented the use of the instrument alone at higher doses. A backup stopwatch was used for the bar test in these cases. Some of the advantages and limitations are discussed. Results are also compared to the crossed-legs position (CLP) test for all three antipsychotics. While haloperidol gave similar results at all concentrations tested, clozapine deviated significantly at the highest dose (40 mg/kg) displaying catalepsy in the CLP test but not in the bar test. Olanzapine displayed catalepsy in rats significantly different from vehicle at 40 mg/kg in both the bar and CLP tests. However, the CLP test may be more suited to compounds with gripping problems which prevent the consistent grasping of the bar. Overall, the instrument was found to be a useful aid in conducting the bar test for catalepsy. The CLP test was found to complement the bar test under certain conditions and could provide additional data that might be missed by the bar test for compounds producing grasping problems.

Evaluation of the behavioral and pharmacokinetic profile of SYA013, a homopiperazine analog of haloperidol in rats

SYA013, a homopiperazine analog of haloperidol, was further evaluated for antipsychotic potential using additional animal models. Previously, SYA013 was tested in mice with an antipsychotic screening model in which it inhibited apomorphine induced climbing behavior, indicating antagonism of the dopaminergic system and the potential for use in the treatment of schizophrenia. In this study, SYA013 was shown to inhibit both d-amphetamine-induced locomotor activity in rats and conditioned avoidance response (CAR) in rats in a dose dependent manner and in the case of CAR, without producing any escape failure responses (EFRs), two tests predictive of antipsychotic action. The selective 5HT(1A) antagonist WAY100,635 was used to determine if binding of SYA013 to the 5HT(1A) receptor contributed to suppression of CAR. The results indicated that 0.63mg/kg WAY100,635 did not have a significant effect on the inhibition of CAR by SYA013. Pharmacokinetic parameters in brain and plasma were determined for SYA013. A log brain/plasma concentration ratio at a t(max) of 1.48 suggests that SYA013 readily crosses the blood brain barrier (BBB). The hypothesis that binding of SYA013 to the 5HT(1A) receptor contributed to the lack of significant catalepsy was investigated using the 5HT(1A) antagonist WAY100,635. The results of acute and semi-chronic tests suggest that binding to the 5HT(1A) receptor alone did not significantly account for the lack of catalepsy. Lack of catalepsy was preserved after the semi-chronic challenge with SYA013. These tests further indicate that SYA013 has a pharmacological profile with the potential for use in the treatment of neuropsychiatric diseases. In addition, the 5HT(1A) receptor does not appear to play a significant role in the pharmacological profile of SYA013.

Comparative pharmacology of antipsychotics possessing combined dopamine D2 and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor properties

RATIONALE

There is increasing interest in antipsychotics intended to manage positive symptoms via D(2) receptor blockade and improve negative symptoms and cognitive deficits via 5-HT(1A) activation. Such a strategy reduces side-effects such as the extrapyramidal syndrome (EPS), weight gain, and autonomic disturbance liability.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to review pharmacological literature on compounds interacting at both 5-HT(1A) and D(2) receptors (as well as at other receptors), including aripiprazole, perospirone, ziprasidone, bifeprunox, lurasidone and cariprazine, PF-217830, adoprazine, SSR181507, and F15063.

METHODS

We examine data on in vitro binding and agonism and in vivo tests related to (1) positive symptoms (e.g., psychostimulant-induced hyperactivity or prepulse inhibition deficit), (2) negative symptoms (e.g., phencyclidine-induced social interaction deficits and cortical dopamine release), and (3) cognitive deficits (e.g., phencyclidine or scopolamine-induced memory deficits). EPS liability is assessed by measuring catalepsy and neuroendocrine impact by determining plasma prolactin, glucose, and corticosterone levels.

RESULTS

Compounds possessing "balanced" 5-HT(1A) receptor agonism and D(2) antagonism (or weak partial agonism) and, in some cases, combined with other beneficial properties, such as 5-HT(2A) receptor antagonism, are efficacious in a broad range of rodent pharmacological models yet have a lower propensity to elicit EPS or metabolic dysfunction.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent compounds exhibiting combined 5-HT(1A)/D(2) properties may be effective in treating a broader range of symptoms of schizophrenia and be better tolerated than existing antipsychotics. Nevertheless, further investigations are necessary to evaluate recent compounds, notably in view of their differing levels of 5-HT(1A) affinity and efficacy, which can markedly influence activity and side-effect profiles.

The sigma-1 antagonist BMY-14802 inhibits L-DOPA-induced abnormal involuntary movements by a WAY-100635-sensitive mechanism

RATIONALE

Levodopa (L-DOPA), the gold standard treatment for Parkinson's disease (PD), eventually causes L-DOPA-induced dyskinesia (LID) in up to 80% of patients. In the 6-hydroxydopamine (6-OHDA) rat model of PD, L-DOPA induces a similar phenomenon, which has been termed abnormal involuntary movement (AIM). We previously demonstrated that BMY-14802 suppresses AIM expression in this model.

OBJECTIVES

Although BMY-14802 is widely used as a sigma-1 antagonist, it is also an agonist at serotonin (5-HT) 1A and adrenergic alpha-1 receptors. The current study was conducted to determine which of these mechanisms underlies BMY-14802's AIM-suppressing effect. This characterization included testing the 5-HT1A agonist buspirone and multiple sigma agents. When these studies implicated a 5-HT1A mechanism, we subsequently undertook a pharmacological reversal study, evaluating whether the 5-HT1A antagonist WAY-100635 counteracted BMY-14802's AIM-suppressing effects.

RESULTS

Buspirone dose-dependently suppressed AIM, supporting past findings. However, no AIM-suppressing effects were produced by drugs with effects at sigma receptors, including BD-1047, finasteride, SM-21, DTG, trans-dehydroandrosterone (DHEA), carbetapentane, and opipramol. Finally, we show for the first time that the AIM-suppressing effect of BMY-14802 was dose-dependently prevented by WAY-100635 but not by the alpha-1 antagonist prazosin.

CONCLUSIONS

BMY-14802 exerts its AIM-suppressing effects via a 5-HT1A agonist mechanism, similar to buspirone. Other 5-HT1A agonists have failed clinical trials, possibly due to submicromolar affinity at other receptors, including D2, which may exacerbate PD symptoms. BMY-14802 is a promising candidate for clinical trials due to its extremely low affinity for the D2 receptor and lack of extrapyramidal effects during prior clinical trials for schizophrenia.

Nicotinic receptors differentially modulate the induction and expression of behavioral sensitization to methylphenidate in rats

RATIONALE

Nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) regulate sensitization to stimulant drugs such as d-amphetamine and cocaine.

OBJECTIVES

The current study determined if nAChRs modulate the induction and/or expression of behavioral sensitization to high methylphenidate doses.

METHODS

In experiment 1, rats received saline or mecamylamine (3 mg/kg, sc), followed by saline or methylphenidate (5.6 or 10 mg/kg, sc) during 10 daily sessions; the effect of methylphenidate (1-17 mg/kg, sc) alone was determined 14 days later. In experiment 2, rats received saline or dihydro-beta-erythroidine (DHbetaE; 3 mg/kg, sc), followed by saline or 5.6 mg/kg of methylphenidate. In experiment 3, rats received saline or methylphenidate (5.6 or 10 mg/kg, sc) alone for 10 days; the effect of acute mecamylamine (3 mg/kg, sc) on the response to methylphenidate (1-17 mg/kg, sc) was determined 14 days later. Locomotor activity, sniffing, rearing, grooming, and stereotypy ratings were dependent measures.

RESULTS

Methylphenidate produced dose-dependent increases in locomotor activity, sniffing, and stereotypy on day 1 and these effects were enhanced on day 10, indicative of sensitization. Mecamylamine attenuated methylphenidate-induced stereotypy only on day 1, but reduced locomotor activity, sniffing, rearing, and stereotypy on day 10 and during the methylphenidate challenge phase; similar results were obtained with DHbetaE. However, acute mecamylamine did not alter the effects of the methylphenidate challenge following the induction of sensitization to methylphenidate alone.

CONCLUSIONS

Although nAChRs do not appear to regulate the expression of methylphenidate-induced behavioral sensitization, inhibition of high-affinity beta2 subunit nAChRs attenuates the induction of behavioral sensitization to high doses of methylphenidate.

Pharmacological profiles in rats of novel antipsychotics with combined dopamine D2/serotonin 5-HT1A activity: comparison with typical and atypical conventional antipsychotics

Combining antagonist/partial agonist activity at dopamine D2 and agonist activity at serotonin 5-HT1A receptors is one of the approaches that has recently been chosen to develop new generation antipsychotics, including bifeprunox, SSR181507 and SLV313. There have been, however, few comparative data on their pharmacological profiles. Here, we have directly compared a wide array of these novel dopamine D2/5-HT1A and conventional antipsychotics in rat models predictive of antipsychotic activity. Potency of antipsychotics to antagonize conditioned avoidance, methylphenidate-induced behaviour and D-amphetamine-induced hyperlocomotion correlated with their affinity at dopamine D2 receptors. Potency against ketamine-induced hyperlocomotion was independent of affinity at dopamine D2 or 5-HT1A receptors. Propensity to induce catalepsy, predictive of occurrence of extrapyramidal side effects, was inversely related to affinity at 5-HT1A receptors. As a result, preferential D2/5-HT1A antipsychotics displayed a large separation between doses producing 'antipsychotic-like' vs. cataleptogenic actions. These data support the contention that 5-HT1A receptor activation greatly reduces or prevents the cataleptogenic potential of novel antipsychotics. They also emphasize that interactions at 5-HT1A and D2 receptors, and the nature of effects (antagonism or partial agonism) at the latter has a profound influence on pharmacological activities, and is likely to affect therapeutic profiles.

Towards a New Generation of Potential Antipsychotic Agents Combining D2 and 5-HT1A Receptor Activities

We report the discovery and the synthesis of novel, potential antipsychotic compounds combining potent dopamine D2 receptor antagonist and serotonin 5-HT1A receptor agonist properties in the same molecule. We describe the structure-activity relationship that lead us to the promising derivative: N-[(2,2-dimethyl-2,3-dihydro-benzofuran-7-yloxy)ethyl]-3-(cyclopent-1-enyl)-benzylamine 16. The latter has high affinity for D2 and 5-HT1A receptors, whereas it possesses only a weak affinity for 5-HT2A sites. In cellular models of signal transduction, 16 behaves as a silent antagonist at rD2 receptors while activating h5-HT1A receptors with an efficacy at least equivalent to that of the prototypical 5-HT1A agonist (+/-)-8-OH-DPAT. These dual actions confer a unique pharmacological profile to the product. In a behavioral model predictive of positive symptoms, 16 has an activity comparable to that of the typical antipsychotic haloperidol, while it is devoid of cataleptogenic effects. Although it produces behaviors characteristic of 5-HT1A receptor activation in rats, these occur at doses 100 times higher than those with (+/-)-8-OH-DPAT. We believe that the relative balance of D2 and 5-HT1A actions in 16 is appropriate, possibly optimal, to ensure superior efficacy and tolerability over existing antipychotic drugs.

A comprehensive in vitro screening of d-, l-, and dl-threo-methylphenidate: an exploratory study

dl-Methylphenidate (MPH) has been widely used to treat attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) for the last half century. It had been exclusively available in the racemic form, i.e., a 50:50 mixture of d- and l-isomers. However, a single enantiomer formulation, d-MPH (dexmethylphenidate), became available for general clinical use in 2002. For this reason, the intrinsic pharmacological differences in the effects of d- and l-MPH have recently come under intense investigation. The primary therapeutic effects of MPH are generally recognized to reside in the d-isomer. The present investigation provides quantitative values for a broad range of receptor-level interactions of the individual MPH isomers to better characterize the distinction between dl-MPH versus d-MPH versus l-MPH as it relates to binding affinity at sites associated with relevant central nervous system (CNS) pharmacology, as well as peripheral physiology. Overall, there were few differences in binding affinities between d-MPH and the racemate whereas there were more apparent differences between d-MPH and l-MPH. d-MPH exhibited prominent affinity at the norepinephrine transporter (NET) site, even exceeding such affinity at the dopamine transporter (DAT). These results further demonstrate that affinity for catecholaminergic sites largely resides in the d-MPH isomer. Although binding affinity was not demonstrable at the serotonin (5-HT) transporter site (SERT), novel findings of the study included affinity for the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2B receptor sites for both d- and l-MPH, with d-MPH exerting by far the most predominant effects at these sites. Thus, the emerging data of favorable therapeutic effects of ADHD treatment with d-MPH (and dl-MPH) may be underpinned by affinity and potential pharmacologic effects at NET and DAT sites, as well as sites relevant to serotonergic neurotransmission that may modulate mood, cognition, and motor behavior. However, the present exploratory studies reflect receptor binding affinities only. The specific pharmacological activities (i.e., agonism vs. antagonism) of these compounds await further exploration.

Antipsychotic-like vs cataleptogenic actions in mice of novel antipsychotics having D2 antagonist and 5-HT1A agonist properties

A new generation of proven or potential antipsychotics, including aripiprazole, bifeprunox, SSR181507 and SLV313, exhibit agonist actions at serotonin 5-HT1A receptors, but little comparative data are available on their pharmacological profiles. Here, we compared in mice the in vivo antipsychotic-like vs cataleptogenic activities of these compounds with those of drugs that exhibit little interaction at 5-HT1A receptors, such as haloperidol, olanzapine and risperidone. All the drugs dose-dependently reduced apomorphine-induced climbing or sniffing and, with the exception of ziprasidone, produced complete suppression of these responses. In the bar catalepsy test, when administered alone, haloperidol, olanzapine and risperidone produced marked catalepsy, whereas, at doses up to 40 mg/kg, aripiprazole, SLV313, SSR181507, and sarizotan produced little or no catalepsy. The latter compounds, therefore, displayed a large separation between doses with 'antipsychotic-like' and those with cataleptogenic actions. When 5-HT1A receptors were blocked by pretreatment with WAY100635 (2.5 mg/kg, s.c.), cataleptogenic properties of SSR181507 and sarizotan were unmasked, and the catalepsy induced by bifeprunox was enhanced. In the case of aripiprazole and SLV313, although WAY100635 produced upward shifts in their dose-response, the magnitude of catalepsy appeared to reach an asymptotic plateau, suggesting that other mechanisms may be involved in their low cataleptogenic liability. The present data confirm that 5-HT1A receptor activation reduces or even completely prevents the cataleptogenic potential of novel antipsychotic agents. Further, they indicate that the balance of affinity and/or efficacy between D2 and 5-HT1A receptors profoundly influences their pharmacological activities, and will likely impact their therapeutic profiles.

Comparison of hippocampal G protein activation by 5-HT(1A) receptor agonists and the atypical antipsychotics clozapine and S16924

This study employed [(35)S]guanosine 5'- O-(3-thiotriphosphate) ([(35)S]GTPgammaS) binding to compare the actions of antipsychotic agents known to stimulate cloned, human 5-HT(1A) receptors with those of reference agonists at postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors. In rat hippocampal membranes, the following order of efficacy was observed (maximum efficacy, E(max), values relative to 5-HT=100): (+)8-OH-DPAT (85), flesinoxan (62), eltoprazine (60), S14506 (59), S16924 (48), buspirone (41), S15535 (22), clozapine (22), ziprasidone (21), pindolol (7), p-MPPI (0), WAY100,635 (0), spiperone (0). Despite differences in species and tissue source, the efficacy and potency (pEC(50)) of agonists (with the exception of clozapine) correlated well with those determined previously at human 5-HT(1A) receptors expressed in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. In contrast, clozapine was more potent at hippocampal membranes. The selective antagonists p-MPPI and WAY100,635 abolished stimulation of binding by (+)8-OH-DPAT, clozapine and S16924 (p-MPPI), indicating that these actions were mediated specifically by 5-HT(1A) receptors. Clozapine and S16924 also attenuated 5-HT- and (+)8-OH-DPAT-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding, consistent with partial agonist properties. In [(35)S]GTPgammaS autoradiographic studies, 5-HT-induced stimulation, mediated through 5-HT(1A) receptors, was more potent in the septum (pEC(50) approximately 6.5) than in the dentate gyrus of the hippocampus (pEC(50) approximately 5) suggesting potential differences in coupling efficiency or G protein expression. Though clozapine (30 and 100 microM) did not enhance [(35)S]GTPgammaS labelling in any structure, S16924 (10 micro M) modestly increased [(35)S]GTPgammaS labelling in the dentate gyrus. On the other hand, both these antipsychotic agents attenuated 5-HT (10 microM)-stimulated [(35)S]GTPgammaS binding in the dentate gyrus and septum. In conclusion, clozapine, S16924 and ziprasidone act as partial agonists for G protein activation at postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors in the hippocampus. These data support a role of postsynaptic 5-HT(1A) receptors in the functional profiles of certain antipsychotic agents.

Differential effects of 5-HT agonists and antagonists on the repeated acquisition and performance of response sequences in monkeys

As a means of characterizing the role of 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors in learning, 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) agonists and antagonists with selective affinities for each receptor subtype (i.e. 8-hydroxy-dipropylaminotetralin (8-OH-DPAT), (-)-4-(dipropylamino)-1,3,4,5-tetrahydrobenz-(c,d,)indole-6-carboxamide (LY228729), (+/-)-1-(4-iodo-2,5-dimeth-oxyphenyl)-2-aminopropane hydrochloride (DOI), 4-iodo-N-[2- [4-(methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl] ethyl]-N-2-pyridinyl-benzamide hydrochloride (p-MPPI), N-[2- [4- (2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl] ethyl] -N-2-pyridinyl-cyclohexanecarboxamide maleate (WAY-100635), 1-(2-methoxyphenyl)-4-[4-(2-phthalimido)butyllpiperazine hydrobromide (NAN-190) and ritanserin) were administered to monkeys responding under a multiple schedule of repeated acquisition and performance. In addition, a selective 5-HT1A receptor agonist (8-OH-DPAT) was administered in combination with a 5-HT2A receptor antagonist (ritanserin) to examine any potential interactions between the two 5-HT receptor subtypes. When administered alone, 8-OH-DPAT (0.1-3.2mg/kg), LY228729 (0.32-3.2 mg/kg) and DOI (0.018-3.2 mg/kg) dose-dependently decreased overall response rate in both schedule components, and generally increased the percentage of errors in the acquisition components at doses lower than those that increased the percentage of errors in the performance components. At the doses of each drug tested (i.e. 0.1 or 0.32 mg/kg), both p-MPPI and WAY-100635 antagonized the disruptive effects of 8-OH-DPAT, by shifting the dose-effect curves for overall response rate and the percentage of errors to the right. In contrast, ritanserin (0.32 or 1mg/kg) had little or no effect on the disruptions produced by 8-OH-DPAT, but it effectively antagonized the rate-decreasing and error-increasing effects produced by the 5-HT2A agonist DOI. Administration of the 5-HT1A antagonists WAY-100635 and NAN-190 alone produced dose-dependent rate-decreasing effects, but the effects on accuracy of responding in the acquisition components differed from those of the 5-HT1A agonists (8-OH-DPAT and LY228729), in that they did not produce an increase in the percentage of errors. Together, these results suggest that 5-HT is capable of disrupting learning in monkeys through actions at both the 5-HT1A and 5-HT2A receptors, and that 5-HT2A receptor antagonism does not unilaterally modify the effects produced by 5-HTA1A receptor activation.

Repeated treatment with 8-OH-DPAT induces tolerance to its ability to produce the 5-HT1A behavioural syndrome, but not to its ability to attenuate haloperidol-induced catalepsy

When administered acutely, 5-hydroxytryptamine1A (5-HT1A) agonists attenuate the cataleptic side effects of antipsychotics. We investigated whether tolerance occurs to these effects after repeated administration of the 5-HT1A agonist 8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT). For comparison, we also assessed the ability of 8-OH-DPAT to produce elements of the 5-HT1A behavioural syndrome (i.e. forepaw treading, flat body posture and lower lip retraction), some of which readily demonstrate tolerance. Catalepsy was measured in rats using both the cross-legged position test and the bar test. Repeated treatment with 8-OH-DPAT (0.63-2.5 mg/kg subcutaneously), once daily for 4 days, did not significantly alter the ability of acute treatment with 8-OH-DPAT (0.01-2.5 mg/kg) to inhibit catalepsy induced by haloperidol (2.5 mg/kg) in either test. In contrast, the ability of 8-OH-DPAT to produce the 5-HT1A behavioural syndrome was significantly attenuated by the repeated treatment. The present data, showing an absence of tolerance to the anti-cataleptic effects of a 5-HT1A agonist, indicate that mixed dopamine antagonist/5-HT1A agonist compounds may continue to have a low propensity to induce extrapyramidal side effects during chronic treatment.

The cataleptogenic effects of the neuroleptic nemonapride are attenuated by its 5-HT1A receptor agonist properties

The effects of the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl)-cycloh exanecarboxamide (WAY 100635) on catalepsy induced by the dopamine D2-like receptor antagonist/5-HT1A receptor agonist nemonapride were examined and compared to its effects on catalepsy induced by neuroleptics that have low affinity for 5-HT1A receptors. Nemonapride induced catalepsy in both cross-legged position and bar tests at low, but not at high doses. Pretreatment with WAY 100635 (0.63 mg/kg) reinstated catalepsy at higher doses of nemonapride, indicating that the 5-HT1A receptor agonist properties of nemonapride are responsible for its inability to produce catalepsy at high doses. Additionally, WAY 100635 enhanced significantly the effects of low doses of nemonapride, and of the dopamine D2-like receptor antagonists raclopride and haloperidol. The present data indicate that the 5-HT1A receptor agonist properties of nemonapride attenuate its ability to induce catalepsy at higher doses, and suggest further that tonic 5-HT1A receptor activation may modulate neuroleptic-induced catalepsy.

5-HT1A receptor agonist properties of the antipsychotic, nemonapride: comparison with bromerguride and clozapine

5-HT1A receptor agonists are thought to enhance the antipsychotic-like effects of dopamine D2 receptor antagonists while reducing their potential to produce extrapyramidal side effects. Thus, 5-HT1A receptor agonist properties of mixed 5-HT1A receptor agonists/D2 receptor antagonists might be of clinical importance. The antipsychotics, clozapine and nemonapride, and the putative antipsychotic, bromerguride, have intermediate to high affinity for 5-HT1A receptors. The present study examined the 5-HT1A receptor agonist activity of nemonapride and bromerguride, in comparison with clozapine, which has partial 5-HT1A receptor agonist properties in vitro. Here, 5-HT1A receptor activation was examined in vitro, by measuring forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation in HeLa cells expressing human 5-HT1A receptors, and in vivo, by using microdialysis to measure the extracellular concentration of hippocampal 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) in rats. Nemonapride markedly decreased both forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation and the extracellular concentration of 5-HT; both effects were antagonized by the 5-HT1A receptor antagonist, N-[2-[4-(2-methoxyphenyl)-1-piperazinyl]ethyl]-N-(2-pyridinyl) cyclohexanecarboxamide (WAY100635). In contrast, clozapine only partially decreased forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation and extracellular 5-HT, and only its effects on cAMP accumulation were attenuated by WAY100635. Bromerguride decreased neither forskolin-stimulated cAMP accumulation nor extracellular 5-HT; instead, it antagonized the decrease of cAMP accumulation produced by 5-HT and the decrease of extracellular 5-HT produced by the 5-HT1A agonist (+/-)-8-hydroxy-2-(di-n-propylamino)tetralin (8-OH-DPAT). The selective D2 receptor antagonist, raclopride, affected neither forskolin-stimulated cAMP in vitro nor extracellular 5-HT in vivo. Thus, in contrast with clozapine and bromerguride, only the novel antipsychotic, nemonapride, exhibited marked 5-HT1A receptor agonist properties both in vitro and in vivo; conceivably, these properties may play a role in its preclinical and clinical effects.