Effects of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist flumazenil in hepatic encephalopathy in humans

Prospecting for para-endogenous anxiolytics in the human microbiome: Some promising pathways

The gut microbiome is a vast, variable, and largely unexplored component of human biology that sits at the intersection of heritable and environmental factors, and represents a rich source of novel chemistry that is already known to be compatible with the human body. This alone would make it a promising place to search for new therapeutics, but recent work has also identified gut microbiome abnormalities in patients with a number of psychiatric disorders, including anxiety disorders-suggesting that not only treatments, but cures may lie therein. Here, we'll discuss two known "para-endogenous" anxiolytics-γ-hydroxybutyrate and the neurosteroid allopregnanolone-which have recently been discovered to be produced by the microbiome.

Flumazenil versus placebo or no intervention for people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

Hepatic encephalopathy is a common complication of cirrhosis which results in poor brain functioning. The spectrum of changes associated with hepatic encephalopathy ranges from the clinically 'indiscernible' or minimal hepatic encephalopathy to the clinically 'obvious' or overt hepatic encephalopathy. Flumazenil is a synthetic benzodiazepine antagonist with high affinity for the central benzodiazepine recognition site. Flumazenil may benefit people with hepatic encephalopathy through an indirect negative allosteric modulatory effect on gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor function. The previous version of this review, which included 13 randomised clinical trials, found no effect of flumazenil on all-cause mortality, based on an analysis of 10 randomised clinical trials, but found a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy, based on an analysis of eight randomised clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of flumazenil versus placebo or no intervention for people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and LILACS; meeting and conference proceedings; and bibliographies in May 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials regardless of publication status, blinding, or language in the analyses of benefits and harms, and observational studies in the assessment of harms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data independently. We undertook meta-analyses and presented results using risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I2 values as a marker of heterogeneity. We assessed bias control using the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group domains; determined the quality of the evidence using GRADE; evaluated the risk of small-study effects in regression analyses; and conducted trial sequential, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 14 eligible randomised clinical trials with 867 participants, the majority of whom had an acute episode of overt hepatic encephalopathy. In addition, we identified one ongoing randomised clinical trial. We were unable to gather outcome data from two randomised clinical trials with 25 participants. Thus, our analyses include 842 participants from 12 randomised clinical trials comparing flumazenil versus placebo. We classified one randomised clinical trial at low risk of bias in the overall assessment and the remaining randomised clinical trials at high risk of bias. The duration of follow-up ranged from a few minutes to two weeks, but it was less than one day in the majority of the trials.In total, 32/433 (7.4%) participants allocated to flumazenil versus 38/409 (9.3%) participants allocated to placebo died (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.16; 11 randomised clinical trials; low quality evidence). The Trial Sequential Analysis and the one randomised clinical trial assessed as low risk of bias (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.53) found no beneficial or harmful effects of flumazenil on all-cause mortality. The methods used to evaluate hepatic encephalopathy included several different clinical scales, electrophysiological variables, and psychometric tests. Flumazenil was associated with a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy when including all randomised clinical trials (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.80; 824 participants; nine randomised clinical trials; low quality evidence), or just the trial at low risk of bias (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.84; 527 participants). The Trial Sequential Analysis supported a beneficial effect of flumazenil on hepatic encephalopathy. The randomised clinical trials included little information about causes of death and little information on non-fatal serious adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found low quality evidence suggesting a short-term beneficial effect of flumazenil on hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis, but no evidence of an effect on all-cause mortality. Additional evidence from large, high quality randomised clinical trials is needed to evaluate the potential benefits and harms of flumazenil in people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy.

Flumazenil versus placebo or no intervention for people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

Hepatic encephalopathy is a common complication of cirrhosis which results in poor brain functioning. The spectrum of changes associated with hepatic encephalopathy ranges from the clinically 'indiscernible' or minimal hepatic encephalopathy to the clinically 'obvious' or overt hepatic encephalopathy. Flumazenil is a synthetic benzodiazepine antagonist with high affinity for the central benzodiazepine recognition site. Flumazenil may benefit people with hepatic encephalopathy through an indirect negative allosteric modulatory effect on gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor function. The previous version of this review, which included 13 randomised clinical trials, found no effect of flumazenil on all-cause mortality, based on an analysis of 10 randomised clinical trials, but found a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy, based on an analysis of eight randomised clinical trials.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of flumazenil versus placebo or no intervention for people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, Science Citation Index Expanded, and LILACS; meeting and conference proceedings; and bibliographies in May 2017.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included randomised clinical trials regardless of publication status, blinding, or language in the analyses of benefits and harms, and observational studies in the assessment of harms.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors extracted data independently. We undertook meta-analyses and presented results using risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) and I2 values as a marker of heterogeneity. We assessed bias control using the Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group domains; determined the quality of the evidence using GRADE; evaluated the risk of small-study effects in regression analyses; and conducted trial sequential, subgroup, and sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

We identified 14 eligible randomised clinical trials with 867 participants, the majority of whom had an acute episode of overt hepatic encephalopathy. In addition, we identified one ongoing randomised clinical trial. We were unable to gather outcome data from 2 randomised clinical trials with 25 participants. Thus, our analyses include 842 participants from 12 randomised clinical trials comparing flumazenil versus placebo. We classified one randomised clinical trial at low risk of bias in the overall assessment and the remaining randomised clinical trials at high risk of bias. The duration of follow-up ranged from a few minutes to two weeks, but it was less than one day in the majority of the trials.In total, 32/433 (7.4%) participants allocated to flumazenil versus 38/409 (9.3%) participants allocated to placebo died (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.48 to 1.16; 11 randomised clinical trials; low quality evidence). The Trial Sequential Analysis and the one randomised clinical trial assessed as low risk of bias (RR 0.76, 95% CI 0.37 to 1.53) found no beneficial or harmful effects of flumazenil on all-cause mortality. The methods used to evaluate hepatic encephalopathy included several different clinical scales, electrophysiological variables, and psychometric tests. Flumazenil was associated with a beneficial effect on hepatic encephalopathy when including all randomised clinical trials (RR 0.75, 95% CI 0.71 to 0.80; 824 participants; 9 randomised clinical trials; low quality evidence), or just the trial at low risk of bias (RR 0.78, 95% CI 0.72 to 0.84; 527 participants). The Trial Sequential Analysis supported a beneficial effect of flumazenil on hepatic encephalopathy. The randomised clinical trials included little information about causes of death and little information on non-fatal serious adverse events.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

We found low quality evidence suggesting a short-term beneficial effect of flumazenil on hepatic encephalopathy in people with cirrhosis, but no evidence of an effect on all-cause mortality. Additional evidence from large, high quality randomised clinical trials is needed to evaluate the potential benefits and harms of flumazenil in people with cirrhosis and hepatic encephalopathy.

Mechanisms of Action and Persistent Neuroplasticity by Drugs of Abuse

Adaptation of the nervous system to different chemical and physiologic conditions is important for the homeostasis of brain processes and for learning and remembering appropriate responses to challenges. Although processes such as tolerance and dependence to various drugs of abuse have been known for a long time, it was recently discovered that even a single pharmacologically relevant dose of various drugs of abuse induces neuroplasticity in selected neuronal populations, such as the dopamine neurons of the ventral tegmental area, which persist long after the drug has been excreted. Prolonged (self-) administration of drugs induces gene expression, neurochemical, neurophysiological, and structural changes in many brain cell populations. These region-specific changes correlate with addiction, drug intake, and conditioned drugs effects, such as cue- or stress-induced reinstatement of drug seeking. In rodents, adolescent drug exposure often causes significantly more behavioral changes later in adulthood than a corresponding exposure in adults. Clinically the most impairing and devastating effects on the brain are produced by alcohol during fetal development. In adult recreational drug users or in medicated patients, it has been difficult to find persistent functional or behavioral changes, suggesting that heavy exposure to drugs of abuse is needed for neurotoxicity and for persistent emotional and cognitive alterations. This review describes recent advances in this important area of research, which harbors the aim of translating this knowledge to better treatments for addictions and related neuropsychiatric illnesses.

Medication prescribing in liver dysfunction

Patients with mental illness often have co-occurring substance abuse which increases the risk for developing cirrhosis, particularly with common etiologies such as hepatitis and alcoholic liver disease. As such, knowledge of how the disease may impact medication prescribing is important. Unfortunately, there is a paucity of data to guide medication prescribing in these patients. Product labeling information should be used in the clinical decision making process. Additionally, clinicians should consider the etiology of disease, adverse effect profile, and pharmacokinetic parameters including solubility, product formulation, protein binding, hydrophilicity, metabolism, bioavailability, extraction ratios, excretion route, and half-life. Thoughtful consideration should be given when prescribing potentially hepatotoxic medications, and those which may increase bleeding risk in patients with coagulopathy. It is essential to ensure every medication has an appropriate indication and carefully evaluate the need for each medication. Overall, more research is necessary to support clinical decision-making with outcomes based research in patients with chronic liver disease.

Monitoring and managing hepatic disease in anaesthesia

Patients with liver disease have multisystem organ dysfunction that leads to physiological perturbations ranging from hyperbilirubinaemia of no clinical consequence to severe coagulopathy and metabolic disarray. Patient-specific risk factors, clinical scoring systems, and surgical procedures stratify perioperative risk for these patients. The anaesthetic management of patients with hepatic dysfunction involves consideration of impaired drug metabolism, hyperdynamic circulation, perioperative hypoxaemia, bleeding, thrombosis, and hepatic encephalopathy.

GABAergic transmission in hepatic encephalopathy

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE)(1) is a neuropsychiatric disorder caused by chronic or acute liver failure. Nearly thirty years ago a hypothesis was formulated explaining the neuropathology of HE by increased GABAergic tone. Recent progress in the GABAA-receptor (GABAAR) molecular pharmacology and biochemistry as well as the physiology of GABAergic transmission provided better understanding of GABA's role in health and disease. A detailed analysis of neuronal populations and their GABAergic afferents affected in HE is still missing. The slow progress in understanding the pathology of GABAergic transmission in HE is due to the high complexity of brain circuitries controlled by multiple types of GABAergic interneurons and the large variety of GABAAR, which are differently affected by pathological conditions and not yet fully identified. The mechanisms of action of the GABAAR agonist taurine, allosteric positive modulators (inhibitory neurosteroids, anaesthetics, benzodiazepines and histamine) and inhibitors of the GABAAR (excitatory neurosteroids, Ro15-4513) are discussed with respect to HE pathophysiology. Perspectives for GABAergic drugs in the symptomatic treatment of HE are suggested.

Theories of the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy

The earliest hypothesis of the pathogenesis of HE implicated ammonia, although effects of appreciable concentrations of this neurotoxin did not resemble HE. Altered eurotransmission in the brain was suggested by similarities between increased GABA-mediated inhibitory neurotransmission and HE, specifically decreased consciousness and impaired motor function. Evidence of increased GABAergic tone in models of HE has accumulated; potential mechanisms include increased synaptic availability of GABA and accumulation of natural benzodiazepine receptor ligands with agonist properties. Pathophysiological concentrations of ammonia associated with HE, have the potential of enhancing GABAergic tone by mechanisms that involve its interactions with the GABAa receptor complex.

Natural endogenous ligands for benzodiazepine receptors in hepatic encephalopathy

Benzodiazepines of natural origin (NBZDs) have been found in human blood and brains as well as in medicinal plants and foods. In plasma and brain tissue there are i.e. diazepam and nordiazepam equal to commercial drugs but there are also other benzodiazepine-like compounds termed "endozepines", which act as agonists at the benzodiazepine receptors of central type (CBR). A synthetic pathway for the production of NBZDs has not yet been found, but it has been suggested that micro-organisms may synthesize molecules with benzodiazepine-like structures. Hence NBZDs could be of both endogenous and exogenous source and be considered as natural anxyolitic and sedative. Interestingly there are also natural compounds, such as the polypeptide Diazepam Binding Inhibitor (DBI) acting as an "inversive agonist" implicated in fair and panic disorders. It has been suggested that NBZDs may play a role in the pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). Multidirectional studies evaluated NBZDs levels (1) in the blood of normal subjects, of cirrhotic with or without HE and in commercial benzodiazepine consumers; (2) in the blood of cirrhotic treated or not with a non-absorbable antibiotic; (3) in several constituents of our diet. In conclusion, NBZDs increase sometime in cirrhotics with or without HE but they reach concentrations not higher than those found in commercial benzodiazepines consumers. Hence NBZDs must be considered as occasional precipitating factor of HE and benzodiazepine antagonists only symptomatic drugs. The finding that NBZDs may be in part synthesized by intestinal bacterial flora and in part constituent of our diet underlines the importance to feed cirrhotic patients with selected food.

Dose adjustment in patients with liver disease

Unfortunately, there is no endogenous marker for hepatic clearance that can be used as a guide for drug dosing. In order to predict the kinetic behaviour of drugs in cirrhotic patients, agents can be grouped according to their extent of hepatic extraction. For drugs with a high hepatic extraction (low bioavailability in healthy subjects), bioavailability increases and hepatic clearance decreases in cirrhotic patients. If such drugs are administered orally to cirrhotic patients, their initial dose has to be reduced according to hepatic extraction. Furthermore, their maintenance dose has to be adapted irrespective of the route of administration, if possible, according to kinetic studies in cirrhotic patients. For drugs with a low hepatic extraction, bioavailability is not affected by liver disease, but hepatic clearance may be affected. For such drugs, only the maintenance dose has to be reduced, according to the estimated decrease in hepatic drug metabolism. For drugs with an intermediate hepatic extraction, initial oral doses should be chosen in the low range of normal in cirrhotic patients and maintenance doses should be reduced as for high extraction drugs. In cholestatic patients, the clearance of drugs with predominant biliary elimination may be impaired. Guidelines for dose reduction in cholestasis exist for many antineoplastic drugs, but are mostly lacking for other drugs with biliary elimination. Dose adaptation of such drugs in cholestatic patients is, therefore, difficult and has to be performed according to pharmacological effect and/or toxicity. Importantly, the dose of drugs with predominant renal elimination may also have to be adapted in patients with liver disease. Cirrhotic patients often have impaired renal function, despite a normal serum creatinine level. In cirrhotic patients, creatinine clearance should, therefore, be measured or estimated to gain a guideline for the dosing of drugs with predominant renal elimination. Since the creatinine clearance tends to overestimate glomerular filtration in cirrhotic patients, the dose of a given drug may still be too high after adaptation to creatinine clearance. Therefore, the clinical monitoring of pharmacological effects and toxicity of such drugs is important. Besides the mentioned kinetic changes, the dynamics of some drugs is also altered in cirrhotic patients. Examples include opiates, benzodiazepines, NSAIDs and diuretics. Such drugs may exhibit unusual adverse effects that clinicians should be aware of for their safe use. However, it is important to realise that the recommendations for dose adaptation remain general and cannot replace accurate clinical monitoring of patients with liver disease treated with critical drugs.

Endozepines in recurrent stupor

Stupor is a condition from which the subject can be aroused only by vigorous stimuli. Most patients with stupor have a diffuse organic cerebral dysfunction. Rarely stupor is recurrent and no specific causes can be found. Patients with idiopathic recurrent stupor were awakened by i.v. administration of an antagonist (flumazenil) of the benzodiazepine recognition site located in the GABA(A) receptor. Since no exogenous benzodiazepines were detected in plasma and cerebrospinal fluid by high performance liquid chromatography, an excess of endogenous benzodiazepine-like compounds (endozepines) was proposed as the cause of stupor. The existence of endozepines, their widespread distribution in the CNS and their involvement in hepatic encephalopathy are established. However, the origin of these compounds, how biosynthesis occurs and the mechanisms and causes through which they alter brain functions are poorly understood. The fact that a number of synthetic benzodiazepines are difficult to detect using conventional techniques and the discovery that some cases of recurrent stupor were caused by fraudulent administration of lorazepam question whether the concept of endozepine recurrent stupor can be sustained. This review summarizes the state of endozepine physiology and pharmacology and the clinical syndromes attributed to their involvement. A diagnostic work-up to define endozepine-induced recurrent stupor is suggested.

Flumazenil-Induced Improvement of the Central Dopaminergic System in Rats with Acute Hepatic Failure

Several reports have demonstrated the alleviation of hepatic encephalopathy by flumazenil, an antagonist of benzodiazepine receptors. As changes in central monoaminergic activity are involved in the mechanisms for hepatic encephalopathy, the effects of flumazenil on central monoaminergic activity were evaluated in acute hepatic failure produced by ischemia-reperfusion injury in rats. Eighteen male Wistar rats were evenly assigned to three groups: sham-operated group given saline, liver-ischemic group given saline, and liver-ischemic group given flumazenil. Flumazenil (1 mg/kg) or saline (10 mL/kg) was intraperitoneally administered three times, at 1, 6, and 24 hours after 90 minutes of liver ischemia produced by occlusion of the left portal vein. The extracellular concentrations of neurotransmitter amino acids, monoamines, and their metabolites were determined in the striatum using a microdialysis procedure. Another set of 12 rats was subjected to liver ischemia, and the effect of flumazenil on spontaneous motor activity was examined after 24 hours. The extracellular concentration of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylacetic acid, a metabolite of dopamine, decreased to 39% of that in sham-operated animals 24 hours after surgery (P < 0.05), although the dopamine level did not change. The treatment with flumazenil completely abolished the decrease in the metabolite (P < 0.05). Although the glutamate level in the injured animals decreased to 42% of that in sham-operated animals (P < 0.05), no remarkable increase in the glutamate level was observed in animals treated with flumazenil. Spontaneous motor activity decreased 24 hours after surgery in animals subjected to liver ischemia. Flumazenil led to improvement of spontaneous motor activity 5 minutes after administration, but this effect was not observed after 30 minutes. The restoration of the central dopaminergic function may be a contributing factor in the improvement of hepatic encephalopathy.

Benzodiazepine receptor antagonists for hepatic encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

Hepatic encephalopathy may be associated with accumulation of substances that bind to a receptor-complex in the brain resulting in neural inhibition. Benzodiazepine receptor antagonists may have a beneficial effect on patients with hepatic encephalopathy.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the beneficial and harmful effects of benzodiazepine receptor antagonists for patients with hepatic encephalopathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible trials were identified through The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register on The Cochrane Library, MEDLINE and EMBASE (last search: January 2004), reference lists of relevant articles, authors of trials, and pharmaceutical companies.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing any benzodiazepine receptor antagonist versus placebo or no intervention for hepatic encephalopathy.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently included trials and extracted data. Binary outcomes are reported as risk difference (RD) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) based on a random effects model. Statistical heterogeneity was explored by a chi-squared test with significance set at P < 0.1. The inconsistency across trials was assessed by I(2). Potential sources of heterogeneity were explored through subgroup analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirteen randomised trials with 805 patients were included. Eight trials used a crossover design. All trials were double-blind and assessed flumazenil versus placebo. Data on all outcomes could not be extracted from all trials. The included patients had a favourable prognosis (361/390 [93%] survived in the flumazenil group versus 345/376 [92%] in the placebo group). Flumazenil had a significant beneficial effect on improvement of hepatic encephalopathy at the end of treatment (RD 0.28; 95% CI 0.20 to 0.37, eight trials). Flumazenil had no significant effect on recovery (RD 0.13; 95% CI -0.09 to 0.36, two trials) or mortality RD 0.01; 95% CI -0.05 to 0.07, 10 trials). Flumazenil may be associated with adverse events, but trial results were heterogeneous.

REVIEWERS' CONCLUSIONS

Flumazenil had a significant beneficial effect on short-term improvement of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis and a highly favourable prognosis. Flumazenil had no significant effect on recovery or survival. Considering the fluctuating nature of hepatic encephalopathy, future trials should use a parallel design and assess if treatment with flumazenil leads to a sustained improvement or increased recovery and survival. Until this has been demonstrated, flumazenil may be considered for patients with chronic liver disease and hepatic encephalopathy, but cannot be recommended for routine clinical use.

5,7-Dihydroxy-6-methoxyflavone, a benzodiazepine site ligand isolated from Scutellaria baicalensis Georgi, with selective antagonistic properties

As part of an effort to identify naturally occurring GABA(A) receptor benzodiazepine binding site (BDS) ligands from traditional medicinal herbs, we previously reported that flavonoid derivatives isolated from Scutellaria baicalensis (S. baicalensis) Georgi exhibited significant affinities for the BDS. The present study describes the characterization of 5,7-dihydroxy-6-methoxyflavone (oroxylin A), one of the major components of the herbal extract. Oroxylin A inhibited [3H]flunitrazepam binding to rat cerebral cortical membrane with a IC(50) value of 1.09+/-0.07 microM. A GABA ratio of 1.09+/-0.04 suggests that oroxylin A interacts as an antagonist at the recognition site. In neuropharmacological studies, oral administration of oroxylin A (3.75-60 mg kg(-1)) did not result in significant changes in animal models routinely employed for benzodiazepine (BD) evaluation. However, oroxylin A selectively abolished the anxiolytic, myorelaxant and motor incoordination, but not the sedative and anticonvulsant effects elicited by diazepam, a BDS agonist. These results add oroxylin A to the list of CNS active flavonoids, and as the first naturally occurring member endowed with selective antagonistic actions via the BDS.

Flumazenil vs. placebo in hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis: a meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Randomized controlled trials testing flumazenil in hepatic encephalopathy have shown conflicting results.

AIM

To compare flumazenil and placebo in hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis.

METHODS

An overview of randomized controlled trials comparing flumazenil and placebo in hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis was performed. For each end-point, heterogeneity and treatment efficacy were assessed by Peto and Der Simonian methods. As most trials were crossover in nature, a sensitivity analysis was performed including the two treatment periods.

RESULTS

Six double-blind randomized controlled trials, including 641 patients (326 treated with flumazenil and 315 with placebo), were identified. The treatment duration ranged from 5 min to 3 days. Heterogeneity tests between control groups were not significant. The mean percentages of patients with clinical improvement (five trials) were 27% in treated groups and 3% in placebo groups. This difference was significant by both methods (Peto: odds ratio=6.15; 95% confidence interval, 4.0-9.5; P < 0.001; Der Simonian: mean rate difference, 29%; 95% confidence interval, 17-41; P < 0.001). The mean percentages of patients with electroencephalographic improvement were 19% in treated groups and 2% in placebo groups. This difference was significant only with the Peto method (odds ratio=5.8; 95% confidence interval, 3.4-9.7; P < 0.001). The sensitivity analysis showed similar results.

CONCLUSIONS

This meta-analysis shows that flumazenil induces clinical and electroencephalographic improvement of hepatic encephalopathy in patients with cirrhosis.

Benzodiazepine receptor antagonists for acute and chronic hepatic encephalopathy

BACKGROUND

The pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy is unknown. It has been suggested that liver failure leads to the accumulation of substances that bind to a receptor-complex in the brain resulting in neural inhibition which may progress to coma. Several trials have assessed benzodiazepine receptor antagonists for hepatic encephalopathy, but the results are conflicting.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of benzodiazepine receptor antagonists for patients with acute or chronic hepatic encephalopathy.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Eligible trials were identified through The Cochrane Hepato-Biliary Group Controlled Trials Register, The Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, MEDLINE, EMBASE, reference lists of relevant articles, authors of trials, and the pharmaceutical company known to produce benzodiazepine receptor antagonists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised trials comparing any benzodiazepine receptor antagonist versus placebo or no intervention for hepatic encephalopathy were included, regardless of language or publication status.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Trial inclusion and data extraction were made independently by two contributors. Depending on the presence or absence of significant heterogeneity (P<0.1) a random or fixed effect model was used. Potential causes for heterogeneity were explored by sensitivity analyses.

MAIN RESULTS

Twelve randomised trials with 765 patients were included. Eight trials used a crossover design. All trials were double-blind and assessed flumazenil versus placebo. Data on all outcomes could not be extracted from all trials. The included patients had a favourable prognosis (341/370 (92%) survived in the flumazenil group versus 325/356 (91%) in the placebo group). Flumazenil had no significant effect on full recovery (two trials), survival (nine trials), or on the occurrence of adverse events (five trials). However, flumazenil was associated with a significant effect on improvement of hepatic encephalopathy compared to placebo at the end of treatment (103/346 (30%) versus 23/332 (7 %), risk difference 0.23, 95% confidence interval 0.18 to 0.28, five trials).

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Flumazenil had no significant effect on recovery or survival from hepatic encephalopathy. However, flumazenil had a significant effect on short-term improvement of hepatic encephalopathy in some patients with chronic liver disease and a highly favourable prognosis. Considering the fluctuating nature of hepatic encephalopathy, future trials should use a parallel design and assess if treatment with flumazenil leads to a sustained improvement or increased recovery and survival. Until this has been demonstrated, flumazenil may be considered for patients with chronic liver disease and hepatic encephalopathy, but cannot be recommended for routine clinical use.

Pathogenesis of hepatic encephalopathy

Hepatic encephalopathy is considered to be a reversible metabolic encephalopathy, which occurs as a complication of hepatocellular failure and is associated with increased portal-systemic shunting of gut-derived nitrogenous compounds. Its manifestations are most consistent with a global depression of CNS function, which could arise as a consequence of a net increase in inhibitory neurotransmission, due to an imbalance between the functional status of inhibitory (e.g., GABA) and excitatory (e.g., glutamate) neurotransmitter systems. In liver failure, factors that contribute to increased GABAergic tone include increased synaptic levels of GABA and increased brain levels of natural central benzodiazepine (BZ) receptor agonists. Ammonia, present in modestly elevated levels, may also augment GABAergic tone by direct interaction with the GABAA receptor, synergistic interactions with natural central BZ receptor agonists, and stimulation of astrocytic synthesis and release of neurosteroid agonists of the GABAA receptor. Thus, there is a rationale for therapies of HE that lower ammonia levels and incrementally reduce increased GABAergic tone towards the physiologic norm.

Combination treatment of hepatic encephalopathy due to thioacetamide-induced fulminant hepatic failure in the rat with benzodiazepine and opioid receptor antagonists

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Treatment of hepatic encephalopathy with drugs acting on the target organ of this syndrome, the brain, is unsatisfactory. Combination treatment with different neurotransmitter receptor antagonists may be a rational option to optimize treatment.

METHODS

The effects of various doses of the benzodiazepine receptor antagonist Ro 15-3505 and the opioid receptor antagonist naloxone, alone or in combination, were tested on hepatic encephalopathy in rats with thioacetamide-induced hepatic failure in an open-field activity meter. Comparison of single and combination treatment was also done using a neurological test battery. In addition, we compared survival of treatment-responder rats with treatment non-responders.

RESULTS

Naloxone dose dependently increased ambulatory activity and improved neurological score. Ro 15-3505 also improved ambulatory activity and neurological score; however, the improvement was less evident at higher doses. Combination treatment was not superior to single treatment. Survival was increased in treatment-responder rats.

CONCLUSIONS

The failure of combination treatment with Ro 15-3505 and naloxone to further improve hepatic encephalopathy may suggest that the two neurotransmitter systems are interrelated or that hepatic encephalopathy may not be further improved by drugs acting on the brain.

Plasma and CSF benzodiazepine receptor ligand concentrations in cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy: relationship to severity of encephalopathy and to pharmaceutical benzodiazepine intake

Increased plasma and CSF concentrations of substances which bind to brain benzodiazepine receptors have previously been reported in cirrhotic patients with hepatic encephalopathy (HE). However, their relationship to previous intake of pharmaceutical benzodiazepines has not been clearly established. In the present study, plasma levels of benzodiazepine receptor ligands (BZRLs) were measured using a sensitive radioreceptor assay in 12 control subjects with no evidence of hepatic, neurological or psychiatric illness, 11 cirrhotic patients without HE, 24 cirrhotic patients with moderate (grade I-II) HE and in 45 cirrhotic patients with severe (grade II-IV) HE. In addition, CSF concentrations of BZRLs were measured in 8 cirrhotic patients with HE and an equal number of age-matched controls. Recent intake (within 10 days) of pharmaceutical benzodiazepines was assessed by detailed review of medical files, and interviews with the patient, at least one family member as well as the pharmacist. Significantly increased plasma concentrations of BZRLs were observed in cirrhotic patients with severe encephalopathy (p < 0.02) compared to controls and to cirrhotic patients without (or with mild) neurological impairment. Increased plasma BZRLs could be accounted for by prior exposure to benzodiazepine medication in all cases. CSF concentrations of BZRLs in cirrhotic patients were not significantly different from control values. These findings do not support a role for "endogenous" benzodiazepines in the pathogenesis of HE in chronic liver disease but suggest that pharmaceutic benzodiazepines administered to cirrhotic patients as sedatives or as part of endoscopic work-up could have contributed to the neurological impairment in some patients.

Flumazenil for hepatic encephalopathy grade III and IVa in patients with cirrhosis: an Italian multicenter double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over study

The rationale for use of benzodiazepine receptor antagonists is based on the so-called benzodiazepine pathogenetic hypothesis of hepatic encephalopathy (HE). To assess the efficacy of flumazenil, a specific benzodiazepine receptor antagonist, in a large and selected population of cirrhotic patients with severe HE, we conducted a double-blind, placebo-controlled, cross-over trial on 527 cirrhotic patients with HE grade III and IVa admitted to Intensive Care Units over a 5-year period; among them, 265 (132 of grade III and 133 of grade IVa) received flumazenil, whereas 262 (130 of grade III and 132 of grade IVa) received placebo. Treatment was begun within 15 minutes of randomization; the response to treatment was assessed by neurological score and by continuous electroencephalographic (EEG) recordings. Improvement of the neurological score was documented in 17.5% of grade III patients treated with flumazenil and in 14.7% of grade IVa patients, compared, respectively, with 3.8% and 2.7% of the patients of both groups treated with placebo. Improvements in EEG tracings were observed in 27.8% of grade III patients and in 21.5% of grade IVa patients, compared, respectively, with 5% and 3.3% of the patients of both groups treated with placebo. Benzodiazepines were detected in the serum of 10 patients (4 in grade III group and 6 in grade IVa group). Flumazenil is beneficial only in a selected subset of cirrhotic patients with severe HE; the applicability of this treatment to unselected patients with severe HE still remains to be determined.

The influence of alcoholism and cirrhosis on benzodiazepine receptor function

In a previous study we reported that the affinity of the platelet benzodiazepine receptor was greater in alcoholic cirrhotic patients compared with normal controls and that there were detectable ligands for the neuronal benzodiazepine receptor in plasma from both alcoholic and nonalcoholic cirrhotic patients. The aim of the present study was to assess the separate contributions of alcoholism and cirrhosis to the presence of ligands in plasma for the neuronal and peripheral benzodiazepine receptors and to changes in peripheral benzodiazepine receptor binding in platelets. These parameters were measured in 10 alcoholic cirrhotics, 9 nonalcoholic cirrhotics, 7 alcoholics with a normal liver function, and 15 nonalcoholic subjects and normal liver function. Both groups of alcoholics had been abstinent for several months and the nonalcoholic groups had abstained for 24 h before the study. The concentration of ligands for the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor were significantly higher in both cirrhotic groups compared with the other two groups, suggesting that cirrhosis was responsible for this accumulation. Furthermore, the cirrhotic patients with detectable concentrations of these ligands had significantly poorer episodic memory than those without ligands. However, the presence of ligands for the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor did not correlate with the change in receptor affinity, which was increased in the alcoholic cirrhotic group compared with all other groups. Neither cirrhosis nor alcoholism altered the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor number. The cirrhotic patients with detectable ligands for the neuronal benzodiazepine receptor showed psychomotor slowing and executive dysfunction. The results suggest that the ligands for the peripheral benzodiazepine receptor may contribute to some of the cognitive deficits seen in hepatic encephalopathy, but are not responsible for the receptor affinity change seen in the alcoholic cirrhotics. This affinity change is not solely due to the effects of alcohol and could possibly serve as a marker for those at risk for developing alcoholic cirrhosis.

New aspects on etiology, biochemistry, and therapy of portal systemic encephalopathy: a critical survey

There is scientific agreement that portal systemic encephalopathy (PSE) is caused morphologically by portal systemic shunts and biochemically by constituents of the portal venous blood. Ammonium has a key role in the pathogenesis of PSE. Direct correlations with the degree of PSE have been established exclusively with glutamine, i.e. the terminal product of the peripheral detoxification of ammonium. In PSE, ammonium is probably responsible for damage to astrocytic and neuronal cells. Ammonium's toxic effect is due to the intracerebral glutamine synthesis. After several metabolic steps, which will be discussed in detail, brain cell damage is caused directly or indirectly (exitotoxically) by energy deficiency. Hyperammonemia and PSE are each well defined though different forms of disturbance. Therefore, ammonium is not the sole decisive factor in the pathogenesis of PSE. We performed a detailed and critical analysis of all studies on amino acid therapy of PSE, especially those that were randomized and controlled. This analysis revealed a close and direct correlation between qualitative and quantitative dosages of amino acids on one hand, and parallel improvements of amino acid imbalance (essentially associated with PSE) and degree of PSE on the other. A close and direct dose/efficacy correlation must be assumed. Disturbed plasmatic amino acid homeostasis and cerebral monoaminergic neurotransmission are probably important pathogenic factors of PSE. A fundamental cofactor in the efficacy of each adequate amino acid therapy might be a substantial decrease of endogenous ammonium production. Physiologic benzodiazepines may also have an important function in the pathogenesis of PSE: not so, however, the glutamate-ergic and GABA-ergic neurotransmission, which are disturbed principally in PSE. In close correlation to pathogenesis, established and proposed therapies of PSE are critically discussed.

Cortico-spinal pathways and inhibitory mechanisms in hepatic encephalopathy

Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the cerebral cortex was used to study motor system function in 31 cirrhotics (29 post-necrotic and 2 cryptogenic) with and without hepatic encephalopathy (HE). The results were compared with those of 14 healthy subjects matched for age. A significant increase of central motor conduction time, a significant raising of the motor evoked potential (MEP) threshold at rest and a significant reduction of the MEP/muscle action potential (MAP) amplitude ratio were found only in patients with chronic stable (12 patients) and recurrent (9 patients) HE. Vice versa, a significant shortening of the central silent period was observed in all 31 cirrhotic patients. The peripheral silent period was normal in all instances. These results indicate that the damage to the cortico-spinal pathways is related to the progression of cirrhosis to HE, and that cirrhotic patients present a dysfunction of the inhibitory motor mechanisms before HE is clinically manifest.

Cognitive impairments of alcoholic cirrhotic patients: correlation with endogenous benzodiazepine receptor ligands and increased affinity of platelet receptors

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether differences in cognitive function between alcoholic and non-alcoholic cirrhotic patients relate to differences in endogenous ligands for the benzodiazepine receptor and/or benzodiazepine binding.

METHODS

Seventeen grade-I hepatic encephalopathic patients (nine alcoholic, eight non-alcoholic) were compared with 10 matched controls on plasma concentrations of endogenous ligands for the neuronal benzodiazepine receptor, benzodiazepine binding in platelets, and performance on tests of cognitive function.

RESULTS

Both groups of patients were impaired on verbal recall and on reaction time tasks compared with controls; alcoholic patients were also impaired on Reitan's trails test and digit cancellation. Four of the 17 patients had detectable concentrations of endogenous benzodiazepine ligands and they were more impaired than other patients on trails and cancellation tests. The groups did not differ in the density of benzodiazepine platelet receptors, but receptor affinity was higher in alcoholic patients than in controls; furthermore, receptor affinity correlated with the time to complete the cancellation task and with reaction time.

CONCLUSION

Alcoholic cirrhotic patients may have enhanced concentrations of ligands for neuronal and peripheral benzodiazepine receptors and these may contribute to cognitive impairments in these patients.

GABAergic inhibition of the pituitary release of adrenocorticotropin and alpha-melanotropin is impaired in dogs with hepatic encephalopathy

gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) is the principal depressant neurotransmitter system, but its possible role in the regulation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenocortical (HPA) axis has not yet been investigated in the dog. Moreover, GABA is one of the factors underlying the syndrome of hepatic encephalopathy (HE), and in dogs with HE, the regulation of the HPA axis is deranged. We have therefore investigated the role of the GABA system in the regulation of the HPC system in 10 healthy dogs and 10 dogs with HE due to congenital portosystemic shunts. The effect of an intravenous injection of the GABA antagonist bicuculline on the release of adrenocorticotropin (ACTH), alpha-melanotropin (MSH), and cortisol was measured in plasma. In healthy dogs, a dose of 1.0 mg/kg caused a marked release of ACTH, MSH, and cortisol, but doses of 0.001 to 0.5 mg/kg produced an inconsistent or no response. The high release of MSH after bicuculline administration indicated that the effect of GABA was predominantly in the neurointermediate lobe of the pituitary. In order to investigate whether the effect of GABA was exerted in the pituitary or at a suprapituitary level, the effect of incubation with GABA on basal and corticotropin-releasing hormone-induced ACTH release was measured in primary cultures of anterior and neurointermediate lobe cells from healthy dogs, and no response was observed. We conclude that in healthy dogs, GABA inhibits the release of ACTH and MSH from the neurointermediate lobe of the pituitary at a suprapituitary level. In dogs with HE, 1.0 mg/kg of bicuculline caused virtually no stimulation of the secretion of ACTH, MSH, or cortisol, indicating deranged GABAergic neurotransmission in HE. This may be explained by an increased GABA tone that prevents the effect of the antagonist. Such a high GABA tone associated with HE has been documented in several other species. Dogs with HE had significantly increased basal levels of ACTH, MSH, and cortisol in plasma, and their cortisol:creatinine ratios in 24-hr urine samples (63 +/- 14.10(-6)) were higher than those of healthy dogs (9 +/- 2.10(-6)). An increased basal HPA activity in dogs with HE is not in agreement with augmented GABAergic inhibition, but this contradiction may be explained by the predominance of effects of dopaminergic disinhibition that has been reported in such dogs.

Effect of flumazenil on the electroencephalogram of patients with portosystemic encephalopathy. Results of a double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled multicentre trial

The efficacy of the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil has been assessed clinically in a double blind, randomised, placebo-controlled multicentre study in patients with grade I-III portosystemic encephalopathy. In an ancillary study reported here the effect of flumazenil on the electroencephalogram (EEG) was analysed in 32 patients who had EEG grading according to protocol. Following the baseline observation period, patients were randomised to receive (at 1 min interval) 3 sequential bolus injections of flumazenil (0.4, 0.8 and 1 mg) or placebo followed by infusions of flumazenil (1 mg/h) or placebo for 3 h. Patients were monitored for 5 h after infusion. A positive response was defined as 1 point improvement in EEG grade. After independent analysis of the EEG gradings 5 out of 17 (29%) flumazenil treated patients showed an improvement in EEG grading (3 after bolus, 2 during follow-up) compared to 2 out of 15 (13%) placebo treated patients (1 after bolus, 1 during follow-up) (95% confidence interval of difference: -12% to + 50%). Of the 5 EEG responders after flumazenil, 3 also had an improvement in clinical PSE grading (none after bolus, 2 during infusion, 1 during follow-up), compared to neither of the 2 EEG responders after placebo. EEg responders did not differ from non-responders with respect to Child-Pugh score, basal EEG, PSE grade and positivity for benzodiazepines. In conclusion, treatment perspectives for flumazenil in portosystemic encephalopathy appear to be present for only a minority of patients; however, this study yields no support for a major role of benzodiazepine antagonists in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy.

The benzodiazepine antagonist CGS 8216 prevents hyperammonemia-induced somatostatin receptor reduction in the brain

Previous results from our group showed that hyperammonemia decreases the number of somatostatin (SS) receptors and that benzodiazepine receptors might regulate the number of SS receptors in rat brain. These findings together with the supersensitivity of benzodiazepine receptors in the hyperammonemic rat brain suggest that benzodiazepine receptors might mediate the effect of hyperammonemia on SS receptors. To assess this hypothesis we tested whether 2-phenylpyrazolo[3,4-c]-quinolin-3(5H)-one (CGS 8216), a benzodiazepine antagonist, prevented the effect of ammonium acetate on rat brain SS receptors. Administration of ammonium acetate (5 mmol/kg, i.p.) for 7 days did not affect the levels of somatostatin-like immunoreactivity but decreased the number of SS receptors in synaptosomes from the frontoparietal cortex and hippocampus without affecting their apparent affinity. This decrease could be blocked by the concomitant administration of CGS 8216 (10 mg/kg, i.p.). The benzodiazepine antagonist alone had no observable effect on the somatostatinergic system. These results suggested that the effect of hyperammonemia on SS receptors could be mediated, at least in part, through the benzodiazepine receptors.

Differential effects of flumazenil in alcoholic and nonalcoholic cirrhotic patients

Ligands to the benzodiazepine receptor (BZR) accumulate in hepatic encephalopathy; the benzodiazepine antagonist flumazenil can reverse some manifestations of this condition. This study was designed to explore the effects of flumazenil on cognitive function and anxiety levels in cirrhotic patients without hepatic encephalopathy. Twenty such patients--ten alcoholic, ten nonalcoholics--and ten normal volunteers matched for age and sex were randomly allocated to treatment order (flumazenil or placebo first) in a double-blind cross-over trial. Cognitive function was evaluated with a battery of psychological tests shown previously to be sensitive to the impairment induced by liver disease. Cirrhotic patients performed worse than controls on several tests: digit cancellation, digit symbol substitution, key tapping and Reitan's trail B test. Flumazenil did not reverse these cognitive impairments but it did induce anxiety in nonalcoholic cirrhotics. On one index of memory--delayed word recall--alcoholics performed worse than nonalcoholic cirrhotics. Flumazenil reversed this memory impairment in the alcoholic cirrhotic group. These results suggest that alcohol consumption induces changes at the BZR that are different from changes induced solely by liver impairment.

Gut bacteria provide precursors of benzodiazepine receptor ligands in a rat model of hepatic encephalopathy

Benzodiazepine receptor (BZR) ligands are elevated in animals and humans with fulminant hepatic failure (FHF) and contribute to the pathogenesis of the associated hepatic encephalopathy (HE). As gut factors are proposed to play a role in the pathogenesis of HE, we investigated gut flora as a source of BZR ligands. Rats received daily oral neomycin, vancomycin and metronidazole (AB +) or saline (AB -) before and concurrent with the induction of FHF with thioacetamide. BZR ligands were extracted from brain and plasma and quantified using radiometric techniques. Plasma BZR ligand concentrations in AB(+) and AB(-) rats with HE were higher than AB(+) and AB(-) control rats. Brain BZR ligand concentrations increased in AB(+) and AB(-) rats with HE. Stool cultures from antibiotic treated rats with HE indicated the presence of multidrug resistant Acinetobacter lwoffii. Although no significant concentrations of BZR ligands were detected in culture media inoculated with A. lwoffii, administering A. lwoffii to normal rats significantly elevated BZR ligand levels in brain, but not plasma. Thus, antibiotic treatment of rats is associated with the growth of a resistant strain of bacterium which produces an inactive BZR ligand precursor. BZR ligands may be synthesized from these precursors in the brain and efficiently cleared by a normal liver following brain-to-plasma transfer. Impairment of this clearance process in FHF facilitates their accumulation, enabling agonist BZR ligands to contribute to the pathogenesis of HE by further enhancing GABAergic neurotransmission.

Flumazenil in the treatment of hepatic encephalopathy in children with fulminant liver failure

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effect of flumazenil on hepatic encephalopathy complicating fulminant liver failure in children.

DESIGN

Uncontrolled prospective study.

SETTING

Pediatric Intensive Care Unit, tertiary care center.

PATIENTS

9 children with fulminant liver failure and hepatic encephalopathy awaiting emergency liver transplantation.

INTERVENTIONS

Changes in hepatic encephalopathy grade and in electroencephalogram were recorded during the injection of a bolus of flumazenil (0.01 mg/kg/i.v. bolus) followed by a continuous infusion of flumazenil (0.01 mg/kg/h).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Before flumazenil, 7 children had grade 2 and 2 had grade 3 hepatic encephalopathy. Flumazenile injection mediated an arousal effect in 1 child in whom encephalopathy improved from grade 3 to grade 2. This effect lasted 30 min. No clinical response was observed in other children. An improvement of EEG anomalies was observed lasting 3 min in one child. Despite continuous infusion of flumazenil, encephalopathy worsened in all children.

CONCLUSION

The effect of intravenous administration of flumazenil on hepatic encephalopathy in children with fulminant liver failure is inconsistent. Its efficacy is transient. The therapeutic value of flumazenil in children with fulminant liver failure awaiting a liver graft is minimal at this dosage.

The role of flumazenil in the critically ill

Flumazenil is a specific benzodiazepine antagonist. It competitively inhibits the action of benzodiazepines at gamma aminobutyric acid (GABA) receptors in the central nervous system and thus reverses the sedative effects of benzodiazepines. Usually, it is given intravenously as a bolus dose or as an infusion. It has a short duration of action. Flumazenil is extensively metabolized to compounds that have minimal benzodiazepine antagonistic properties. Reversal of sedation can be useful in many conditions that are often encountered in the critically ill. The adverse effects of its use are usually predictable and, with sufficient clinical monitoring, are usually avoidable. These properties make it a useful and safe drug when used appropriately.

Effect of flumazenil on basal and naloxone-stimulated ACTH and cortisol release in humans

1. Endogenous benzodiazepine receptor ligands are thought to influence the human hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis and naloxone, a known stimulator of adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH) release, is thought to act via release of hypothalamic corticotropin-releasing hormone. 2. The aim of the present study was to assess the influence of endogenous benzodiazepine-receptor ligands by administering flumazenil (Ro15-1788), a benzodiazepine antagonist, and measuring ACTH and cortisol release, both basal and during naloxone-stimulation. 3. Nine normal volunteers in a placebo-controlled double-blind design were studied. Flumazenil (0.5 mg, i.v. bolus) was given 2 min before naloxone (125 micrograms/kg bodyweight, i.v. bolus) immunoreactive-adrenocorticotropic hormone (IR-ACTH) and cortisol levels were measured at frequent intervals from 60 min before to 120 min after naloxone injection. 4. Flumazenil had no effect on ACTH and cortisol release when given alone; flumazenil area under the ACTH/time curve (pmol/L.min) = -36.5 +/- 63.5 compared with placebo = -53.5 +/- 31.8, flumazenil area under the cortisol/time curve (nmol/L.min x 10(-3)) = - 2.4 +/- 2.4 compared with placebo -0.56 +/- 1.4. Flumazenil did not change the ACTH and cortisol release achieved with naloxone; naloxone area under the ACTH/time curve (pmol/L.min) = 327.8 +/- 61.7 compared with flumazenil/naloxone = 366.3 +/- 88.1, naloxone area under the cortisol/time curve (nmol/L. min x 10(-3) = 12.2 +/- 3.4 compared with naloxone/flumazenil = 10.5 +/- 2.1. 5. The authors conclude that flumazenil dose not modify basal or stimulated ACTH and cortisol release in healthy humans. This would suggest that endogenous benzodiazepine-like ligands and the benzodiazepine/gamma-aminobutyric acid receptor complex do not tonically influence the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis.

Flumazenil as a diagnostic tool in the differential diagnosis of coma in a critically ill patient

The purpose of this report is to describe the use of flumazenil as a diagnostic aid in the differential diagnosis of coma in a patient with an inadvertent overdose of benzodiazepines. We report a patient with suspected septic encephalopathy whose level of consciousness markedly improved following flumazenil administration. Subsequent analysis revealed the presence of benzodiazepines and their metabolites in the blood and urine although the patient had not received benzodiazepines for over two weeks. The critically ill patient with multiorgan failure may have considerable derangement of benzodiazepine metabolism; therefore, if an obtunded patient's level of consciousness improves following flumazenil administration, benzodiazepine intoxication must be considered.

Hepatic encephalopathy in rats with thioacetamide-induced acute liver failure is not mediated by endogenous benzodiazepines

BACKGROUND

To distinguish whether the improvement of hepatic encephalopathy by benzodiazepine receptor antagonists is mediated by their antagonistic or their inverse agonistic properties, the neurobehavioral effects of a variety of benzodiazepine receptor ligands in rats with thioacetamide-induced acute liver failure were tested.

METHODS

The neural inhibitory effect of the benzodiazepine agonist flunitrazepam and its reversibility by the "pure" antagonist Ro 14-7437 were examined in thioacetamide-treated rats and controls. The effects of Ro 14-7437, of the partial inverse agonist Ro 15-4513, and the inverse agonist DMCM in rats with hepatic encephalopathy grade II/III were tested. Encephalopathic rats were pretreated with Ro 14-7437 or vehicle and then injected with Ro 15-4513.

RESULTS

Thioacetamide-treated rats were more sensitive to flunitrazepam than controls. In both groups, its effect was completely antagonized with Ro 14-7437. Encephalopathy was significantly improved by Ro 15-4513, although Ro 14-7437 and vehicle had no effect. DMCM worsened the condition of encephalopathic rats but had no effect in controls. Pretreatment with Ro 14-7437 abolished the beneficial effects of Ro 15-4513.

CONCLUSIONS

In rats with thioacetamide-induced liver failure, endogenous benzodiazepines do not precipitate hepatic encephalopathy. The amelioration of hepatic encephalopathy is mediated by benzodiazepine receptor ligands with both antagonistic and inverse agonistic properties.

Temporary abolition of seizure activity by flumazenil in a case of valproate-induced non-convulsive status epilepticus

We report on a 33-year-old female suffering from frequent complex-partial seizures who developed a non-convulsive status epilepticus after one week of antiepileptic therapy with valproate (VPA) which had been added to a basic medication with barbexaclone (BBC) in rapidly increasing dosage. The electroencephalogram (EEG) showed continuous rhythmic generalized sharp and slow wave activity with a frontal maximum. Intravenous administration of 3.0 mg of the benzodiazepine (BZ) receptor antagonist flumazenil under monitoring with video-EEG led to an immediate and marked electroclinical improvement, whereas 6.0 mg of the BZ receptor agonist midazolam was followed by a deterioration both clinically and in the EEG. We discuss the concept of VPA-encephalopathy and the possible mechanisms of the action of flumazenil on VPA-induced as well as on other toxic and metabolic encephalopathies. Flumazenil might antagonize increased benzodiazepine receptor activity with agonistic and even convulsive properties in these encephalopathic syndromes. Further investigations are needed concerning the relation of drug-induced or metabolic encephalopathies and central benzodiazepine receptor activity. We recommend a therapeutic trial with flumazenil, if stupor or decreased seizure control develop in patients treated with valproate.