Effects of cimetidine on gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity and blood ethanol levels

Practical solutions for including sex as a biological variable (SABV) in preclinical neuropsychopharmacological research

Recently, many funding agencies have released guidelines on the importance of considering sex as a biological variable (SABV) as an experimental factor, aiming to address sex differences and avoid possible sex biases to enhance the reproducibility and translational relevance of preclinical research. In neuroscience and pharmacology, the female sex is often omitted from experimental designs, with researchers generalizing male-driven outcomes to both sexes, risking a biased or limited understanding of disease mechanisms and thus potentially ineffective therapeutics. Herein, we describe key methodological aspects that should be considered when sex is factored into in vitro and in vivo experiments and provide practical knowledge for researchers to incorporate SABV into preclinical research. Both age and sex significantly influence biological and behavioral processes due to critical changes at different timepoints of development for males and females and due to hormonal fluctuations across the rodent lifespan. We show that including both sexes does not require larger sample sizes, and even if sex is included as an independent variable in the study design, a moderate increase in sample size is sufficient. Moreover, the importance of tracking hormone levels in both sexes and the differentiation between sex differences and sex-related strategy in behaviors are explained. Finally, the lack of robust data on how biological sex influences the pharmacokinetic (PK), pharmacodynamic (PD), or toxicological effects of various preclinically administered drugs to animals due to the exclusion of female animals is discussed, and methodological strategies to enhance the rigor and translational relevance of preclinical research are proposed.

Pharmacokinetic and metabolomic studies with a BIO 300 Oral Powder formulation in nonhuman primates

BIO 300, a pharmaceutical formulation of genistein, is being developed as a radiation countermeasure to treat hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS) and the delayed effects of acute radiation exposure (DEARE). Several studies have affirmed its safety and efficacy in alleviating the damaging effects of ionizing radiation. However, dose optimization of any drug has always been an important area of research because unnecessarily high drug doses may result in serious complications. In this study, we assessed the pharmacokinetics (PK) and metabolic profiles of two different doses of a novel solid-dosage formulation of BIO 300 (BIO 300 Oral Powder; 100 mg/kg and 200 mg/kg), when administered orally to nonhuman primates (NHPs). While the T_max values of both doses remained the same, the area under the curve at 48 h (AUC_0-48) was tripled by doubling the dose. Additionally, we monitored serum samples for global metabolomic/lipidomic changes using high resolution mass spectrometry followed by functional pathway analysis prior to and at various time points up to 48 h post drug administration. Interestingly, the metabolomic profiles of sera from NHPs that received the lower dose demonstrated a transient perturbation in numerous metabolites between the 4 and 12 h time points. Eventually, the metabolite abundance reverted to near-normal by 48 h. These study results are consistent with our previous studies focused on the PK and metabolomic analysis for parenteral and oral aqueous nanosuspension formulations of BIO 300. This study affirms that administration of a single dose of up to 200 mg/kg of BIO 300 Oral Powder is safe in NHPs and conferred no metabolomic-mediated safety features.

Sex and Heart Failure Treatment Prescription and Adherence

Heart disease is the leading cause of death in both men and women in developed countries. Heart failure (HF) contributes to significant morbidity and mortality and continues to remain on the rise. While advances in pharmacological therapies have improved its prognosis, there remain a number of unanswered questions regarding the impact of these therapies in women. Current HF guidelines recommend up-titration of neurohormonal blockade, to the same target doses in both men and women but several factors may impair achieving this goal in women: more adverse drug reactions, reduced adherence and even lack of evidence on the optimal drug dose. Systematic under-representation of women in cardiovascular drug trials hinders the identification of sex differences in the efficacy and safety of cardiovascular medications. Women are also under-represented in device therapy trials and are 30% less likely to receive a device in clinical practice. Despite presenting with fewer ventricular arrythmias and having an increased risk of implant complications, women show better response to resynchronization therapy, with lower mortality and HF hospitalizations. Fewer women receive advanced HF therapies. They have a better post-heart transplant survival compared to men, but an increased immunological risk needs to be acknowledged. Technological advances in mechanical circulatory support, with smaller and more hemocompatible devices, will likely increase their implantation in women. This review outlines current evidence regarding sex-related differences in prescription, adherence, adverse events, and prognostic impact of the main management strategies for HF.

[Alcohol and the Bariatric Patient: When One Drink Becomes Two Drinks]

Alcohol and the Bariatric Patient: When One Drink Becomes Two Drinks Abstract. Moderate consumption of alcohol is a risk factor for weight gain and obesity. Alcohol affects all components of the energy balance. Alcohol consumption is - as in the general population - also a widespread phenomenon in obese and bariatric patients. As a function of the bariatric surgery technique, alcohol metabolism is altered: gastric bypass surgery and sleeve gastrectomy lead to a faster absorption of alcohol, higher peak alcohol concentration and a longer alcohol persistence in the circulation. Further reward mechanisms for alcohol are changed, so that alcohol consumption is enhanced and promoted, with an increased risk to develop alcohol dependency. It is time to address these issues in the daily practice and to fill the existing research gaps.

Ethanol oxidation and the inhibition by drugs in human liver, stomach and small intestine: Quantitative assessment with numerical organ modeling of alcohol dehydrogenase isozymes

Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) is the principal enzyme responsible for metabolism of ethanol. Human ADH constitutes a complex isozyme family with striking variations in kinetic function and tissue distribution. Liver and gastrointestinal tract are the major sites for first-pass metabolism (FPM). Their relative contributions to alcohol FPM and degrees of the inhibitions by aspirin and its metabolite salicylate, acetaminophen and cimetidine remain controversial. To address this issue, mathematical organ modeling of ethanol-oxidizing activities in target tissues and that of the ethanol-drug interactions were constructed by linear combination of the corresponding numerical rate equations of tissue constituent ADH isozymes with the documented isozyme protein contents, kinetic parameters for ethanol oxidation and the drug inhibitions of ADH isozymes/allozymes that were determined in 0.1 M sodium phosphate at pH 7.5 and 25 °C containing 0.5 mM NAD(+). The organ simulations reveal that the ADH activities in mucosae of the stomach, duodenum and jejunum with ADH1C*1/*1 genotype are less than 1%, respectively, that of the ADH1B*1/*1-ADH1C*1/*1 liver at 1-200 mM ethanol, indicating that liver is major site of the FPM. The apparent hepatic KM and Vmax for ethanol oxidation are simulated to be 0.093 ± 0.019 mM and 4.0 ± 0.1 mmol/min, respectively. At 95% clearance in liver, the logarithmic average sinusoidal ethanol concentration is determined to be 0.80 mM in accordance with the flow-limited gradient perfusion model. The organ simulations indicate that higher therapeutic acetaminophen (0.5 mM) inhibits 16% of ADH1B*1/*1 hepatic ADH activity at 2-20 mM ethanol and that therapeutic salicylate (1.5 mM) inhibits 30-31% of the ADH1B*2/*2 activity, suggesting potential significant inhibitions of ethanol FPM in these allelotypes. The result provides systematic evaluations and predictions by computer simulation on potential ethanol FPM in target tissues and hepatic ethanol-drug interactions in the context of tissue ADH isozymes.

Drug Interactions with Antiulcer Agents: Considerations in the Treatment of Acid-Peptic Disease

All of the antiulcer agents have been implicated in drug interactions. These agents generally influence the absorption, metabolism, or elimination of other medications. However, these interactions can lead to alterations in pharmacodynamic response. The mechanisms by which antiulcer agents produce drug interactions differ among the agents. It is beyond the scope of this article to review all of the drug interactions that have been reported with antiulcer agents. However, it is the intent to provide the reader with a detailed understanding of the mechanisms by which antiulcer agents may interact with other medications and to provide insight into factors that may influence the potential magnitude or clinical consequences of these interactions. An understanding of antiulcer drug interactions will aid pharmacists in assisting clinicians with drug selection and/or monitoring of drug interactions. Specifically, pharmacists can assist with the identification of potential antiulcer drug interactions and develop strategies designed to minimize adverse consequences of these interactions.

Inhibition of human alcohol and aldehyde dehydrogenases by cimetidine and assessment of its effects on ethanol metabolism

Previous studies have reported that cimetidine, an H2-receptor antagonist used to treat gastric and duodenal ulcers, can inhibit alcohol dehydrogenases (ADHs) and ethanol metabolism. Human alcohol dehydrogenases and aldehyde dehydrogenases (ALDHs), the principal enzymes responsible for metabolism of ethanol, are complex enzyme families that exhibit functional polymorphisms among ethnic groups and distinct tissue distributions. We investigated the inhibition by cimetidine of alcohol oxidation by recombinant human ADH1A, ADH1B1, ADH1B2, ADH1B3, ADH1C1, ADH1C2, ADH2, and ADH4, and aldehyde oxidation by ALDH1A1 and ALDH2 at pH 7.5 and a cytosolic NAD(+) concentration. Cimetidine acted as competitive or noncompetitive inhibitors for the ADH and ALDH isozymes/allozymes with near mM inhibition constants. The metabolic interactions between cimetidine and ethanol/acetaldehyde were assessed by computer simulation using the inhibition equations and the determined kinetic constants. At therapeutic drug levels (0.015 mM) and physiologically relevant concentrations of ethanol (10 mM) and acetaldehyde (10 μM) in target tissues, cimetidine could weakly inhibit (<5%) the activities of ADH1B2 and ADH1B3 in liver, ADH2 in liver and small intestine, ADH4 in stomach, and ALDH1A1 in the three tissues, but not significantly affect ADH1A, ADH1B1, ADH1C1/2, or ALDH2. At higher drug levels, which may accumulate in cells (0.2 mM), the activities of the weakly-inhibited enzymes may be decreased more significantly. The quantitative effects of cimetidine on metabolism of ethanol and other physiological substrates of ADHs need further investigation.

Metabolism of ethanol and associated hepatotoxicity

Over the last three decades, direct hepatotoxic effects of ethanol were established, some of which were linked to redox changes produced by NADH generated via the alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) pathway and shown to affect the metabolism of lipids, carbohydrates, proteins, and purines. It was also determined that ethanol can be oxidized by a microsomal ethanol oxidizing system (MEOS) involving a specific cytochrome P-450; this newly discovered ethanol-inducible cytochrome P-450 (P-450 IIEi) contributes to ethanol metabolism, tolerance, energy wastage (with associated weight loss), and the selective hepatic perivenular toxicity of various xenobiotics. Their activation by P-450IIEi now provides an understanding of the increased susceptibility of the heavy drinker to the toxicity of industrial solvents, anaesthetic agents, commonly prescribed drugs, over-the-counter analgesics, and chemical carcinogens. P-450 induction also explains depletion (and toxicity) of nutritional factors such as vitamin A. As a consequence, treatment with vitamin A and other nutritional factors is beneficial, but must take into account a narrowed therapeutic window in alcoholics who have increased needs for nutrients and also display an enhanced susceptibility to some of their adverse effects. Acetaldehyde (the metabolite produced from ethanol by either ADH or MEOS) impairs hepatic oxygen utilization and forms protein adducts, resulting in antibody production, enzyme inactivation, and decreased DNA repair. It also stimulates collagen production by the vitamin A storing cells (lipocytes) and myofibroblasts, and causes glutathione depletion. Supplementation with S-adenosyl-L-methionine partly corrects the depletion and associated mitochondrial injury, whereas administration of polyunsaturated lecithin opposes the fibrosis. Thus, at the cellular level, the classic dichotomy between the nutritional and toxic effects of ethanol has now been bridged. The understanding of how the ensuing injury eventually results in irreversible scarring or cirrhosis may provide us with improved modalities for treatment and prevention.

Sex differences in pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics

Significant differences that exist between the sexes affect the prevalence, incidence and severity of a broad range of diseases and conditions. Men and women also differ in their response to drug treatment. It is therefore essential to understand these reactions in order to appropriately conduct risk assessment and to design safe and effective treatments. Even from that modest perspective, how and when we use drugs can result in unwanted and unexpected outcomes. This review summarizes the sex-based differences that impact on pharmacokinetics, and includes a general comparison of clinical pharmacology as it applies to men, women and pregnant women. Sex-related or pregnancy-induced changes in drug absorption, distribution, metabolism and elimination, when significant, may guide changes in dosage regimen or therapeutic monitoring to increase its effectiveness or reduce potential toxicity. Given those parameters, and our knowledge of sex differences, we can derive essentially all factors necessary for therapeutic optimization. Since this is a rapidly evolving area, it is essential for the practitioner to review drug prescribing information and recent literature in order to fully understand the impact of these differences on clinical therapeutics.

Lactic acid bacteria prevent alcohol-induced steatohepatitis in rats by acting on the pathways of alcohol metabolism

The objective is to study the possible mechanism by which lactic acid bacteria (LAB) prevent alcohol-induced steatohepatitis in rats. A total of 25 Wistar rats were divided into three groups: a LAB-fed group, an alcohol-treated group and a control group. Both the LAB-fed group and the alcohol-treated group received alcohol (10 g kg(-1) per day) orally for up to 5 days (125 h). Before exposure to alcohol, the LAB-fed group were first treated daily with 1.5 ml/100 g of a mixture comprising 4 x 10(10) ml(-1) of Lactobacillus acidophilus and 2.5 x 10(7) ml(-1) of Bifidobacterium longum, while the control group was treated with normal saline only. Biochemical data, alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) activity and histology of the liver and stomach were evaluated. The ADH activity in the LAB mixture was 3.52 +/- 0.45 mumol mg(-1) protein (10(9) CFU ml(-1)), and was dose-dependent. By 30 min after taking alcohol, serum alcohol concentrations were 514.24 +/- 80.21 microg ml(-1) in the LAB-fed group and 795.15 +/- 203.45 microg ml(-1) in the alcohol-treated group (P < 0.005). Serum alcohol concentrations were reduced by 48% (P < 0.01) in the LAB-fed group, but by only 4% in the alcohol-treated group (P > 0.05) 120 min after oral intake of alcohol. The blood levels of endotoxin, AST and ALT were improved in the LAB-fed group compared to the alcohol-fed group (P < 0.01). All alcohol-treated rats showed moderate to severe steatohepatitis, but the LAB-fed rats showed almost normal histology or very slight lesions only. In conclusion, LAB decreased the alcohol concentration in the blood by increasing the first-pass metabolism in both the stomach and the liver, and effectively protected against alcohol-induced gastric and liver injury. It is interesting to note that the protection was more effective in the liver.

Biodistribution of radiolabeled ethanol in rodents

The biodistribution of [1-(14)C]ethanol in rodents was examined to determine sites of concentration of ethanol or its metabolites that may contribute to its toxicological and pharmacokinetic characteristics. After i.v. administration of [1-(14)C]ethanol in mice, radioactivity showed a widespread distribution among body organs. Determination of the proportion of tissue radioactivity accounted for by volatile [1-(14)C]ethanol versus nonvolatile (14)C metabolites indicated that tissue radioactivity was mostly in the form of the latter, even as early as 5 min after injection, indicating a rapid metabolism of the radiolabeled ethanol to labeled metabolites. In a separate study, radioactivity was imaged using whole-body autoradiography after i.v. administration in rats. High levels of radioactivity were observed in the Harderian gland, preputial gland, and pancreas at 15 and 60 min after injection. High levels of radioactivity were also apparent at the later time point in the intestinal tract, indicating hepatobiliary excretion of radiolabeled metabolites. Moderate levels of radioactivity were present in the liver, lungs, salivary glands, bone marrow, and kidney cortex. In conclusion, after i.v. [(14)C]ethanol administration, radioactivity initially distributes widely among body organs but concentrates in specific tissues at subsequent time points. Especially notable in the current study was the high concentration of radioactivity accumulating in the pancreas. It is thus tempting to speculate that the well documented high incidence of pancreatic disease observed in human chronic alcoholism may be related to a propensity of this organ to accumulate ethanol and/or reactive ethanol metabolites.

Drug interactions with antisecretory agents

Antisecretory agents may affect the absorption, metabolism, and renal excretion of other drugs. Inhibition of gastric acid secretion may decrease the gastrointestinal absorption of drugs such as ketoconazole that dissolve poorly in the absence of adequate acid. With anti-secretory agents, the drug interaction mechanism most likely to result in adverse effects is the inhibition of hepatic oxidative drug metabolism, primarily a problem with cimetidine. Omeprazole also appears to inhibit the hepatic metabolism of some drugs, but available evidence indicates that it interacts with fewer drugs than cimetidine and the magnitude of the inhibition is lower. Cimetidine decreases the renal clearance of procainamide and its active metabolite, N-acetylprocainamide, probably through interference with active renal tubular secretion. In therapeutic doses, other H2-receptor antagonists probably have minimal effects on renal procainamide elimination.

Safety profile of long-term H2-antagonist therapy

The safety profile of low-dose maintenance therapy with H2-antagonists for duodenal ulcer disease suggests that these agents can be given safely for several years and probably much longer. Because information regarding the use of these compounds for more than 10 years in large numbers of patients is lacking, the safety of these drugs should continue to be monitored. The safety profiles of famotidine and nizatidine will require several additional years of postmarking surveillance data to match the depth of our knowledge regarding cimetidine and ranitidine. Compared to a surgical approach to ulcer disease, continuous H2-blocker maintenance therapy is cost-effective and is associated with significantly less morbidity. Patients with a history of bleeding or other ulcer complication should be encouraged to remain on maintenance therapy if they do not undergo surgery. The need for extended maintenance therapy also applied to individuals with frequent symptomatic ulcer relapses, reflux oesophagitis, and a range of less common disorders. Currently, H2-blockers and sucralfate are the only agents approved by the Food and Drug Administration for maintenance therapy of duodenal ulcer disease. Experience with omeprazole is still limited, and its long-term safety profile must await the completion of controlled trials of maintenance therapy. Given the apparent long-term safety of the H2-blockers for maintenance therapy, any new agent must prove to be equally safe in the clinical arena, a task that may be indeed formidable.

Reversing gastric mucosal alterations during ethanol-induced chronic gastritis in rats by oral administration of Opuntia ficus-indica mucilage

AIM: To study the effect of mucilage obtained from cladodes of Opuntia ficus-indica (Cactaceae) on the healing of ethanol-induced gastritis in rats.

METHODS: Chronic gastric mucosa injury was treated with mucilage (5 mg/kg per day) after it was induced by ethanol. Lipid composition, activity of 5’-nucleotidase (a membrane-associated ectoenzyme) and cytosolic activities of lactate and alcohol dehydrogenases in the plasma membrane of gastric mucosa were determined. Histological studies of gastric samples from the experimental groups were included.

RESULTS: Ethanol elicited the histological profile of gastritis characterized by loss of the surface epithelium and infiltration of polymorphonuclear leukocytes. Phosphatidylcholine (PC) decreased and cholesterol content increased in plasma membranes of the gastric mucosa. In addition, cytosolic activity increased while the activity of alcohol dehydrogenases decreased. The administration of mucilage promptly corrected these enzymatic changes. In fact, mucilage readily accelerated restoration of the ethanol-induced histological alterations and the disturbances in plasma membranes of gastric mucosa, showing a univocal anti-inflammatory effect. The activity of 5’-nucleotidase correlated with the changes in lipid composition and the fluidity of gastric mucosal plasma membranes.

CONCLUSION: The beneficial action of mucilage seems correlated with stabilization of plasma membranes of damaged gastric mucosa. Molecular interactions between mucilage monosaccharides and membrane phospholipids, mainly PC and phosphatidylethanolamine (PE), may be the relevant features responsible for changing activities of membrane-attached proteins during the healing process after chronic gastric mucosal damage.

Metabolism of alcohol

Most tissues of the body contain enzymes capable of ethanol oxidation or nonoxidative metabolism, but significant activity occurs only in the liver and, to a lesser extent, in the stomach. Hence, medical consequences are predominant in these organs. In the liver, ethanol oxidation generates an excess of reducing equivalents, primarily as NADH, causing hepatotoxicity. An additional system, containing cytochromes P-450 inducible by chronic alcohol feeding, was demonstrated in liver microsomes and found to be a major cause of hepatotoxicity.

Role of variability in explaining ethanol pharmacokinetics: research and forensic applications

Variability in the rate and extent of absorption, distribution and elimination of ethanol has important ramifications in clinical and legal medicine. The speed of absorption of ethanol from the gut depends on time of day, drinking pattern, dosage form, concentration of ethanol in the beverage, and particularly the fed or fasting state of the individual. During the absorption phase, a concentration gradient exists between the stomach, portal vein and the peripheral venous circulation. First-pass metabolism and bioavailability are difficult to assess because of dose-, time- and flow-dependent kinetics. Ethanol is transported by the bloodstream to all parts of the body. The rate of equilibration is governed by the ratio of blood flow to tissue mass. Arterial and venous concentrations differ as a function of time after drinking. Ethanol has low solubility in lipids and does not bind to plasma proteins, so volume of distribution is closely related to the amount of water in the body, contributing to sex- and age-related differences in disposition. The bulk of ethanol ingested (95-98%) is metabolised and the remainder is excreted in breath, urine and sweat. The rate-limiting step in oxidation is conversion of ethanol into acetaldehyde by cytosolic alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH), which has a low Michaelis-Menten constant (Km) of 0.05-0.1 g/L. Moreover, this enzyme displays polymorphism, which accounts for racial and ethnic variations in pharmacokinetics. When a moderate dose is ingested, zero-order elimination operates for a large part of the blood-concentration time course, since ADH quickly becomes saturated. Another ethanol-metabolising enzyme, cytochrome P450 2E1, has a higher Km (0.5-0.8 g/L) and is also inducible, so that the clearance of ethanol is increased in heavy drinkers. Study design influences variability in blood ethanol pharmacokinetics. Oral or intravenous administration, or fed or fasted state, might require different pharmacokinetic models. Recent work supports the need for multicompartment models to describe the disposition of ethanol instead of the traditional one-compartment model with zero-order elimination. Moreover, appropriate statistical analysis is needed to isolate between- and within-subject components of variation. Samples at low blood ethanol concentrations improve the estimation of parameters and reduce variability. Variability in ethanol pharmacokinetics stems from a combination of both genetic and environmental factors, and also from the nonlinear nature of ethanol disposition, experimental design, subject selection strategy and dose dependency. More work is needed to document variability in ethanol pharmacokinetics in real-world situations.

Alcohol metabolism: role in toxicity and carcinogenesis

This article contains the proceedings of a symposium at the 2002 RSA Meeting in San Francisco, organized and co-chaired by Thomas M. Badger, Paul Shih-Jiun Yin, and Helmut Seitz. The presentations were (1) First-pass metabolism of ethanol: Basic and clinical aspects, by Charles Lieber; (2) Intracellular CYP2E1 transport, oxidative stress, cytokine release, and ALD, by Magnus Ingelman-Sundberg; (3) Pulsatile ethanol metabolism in intragastric infusion models: Potential role in toxic outcomes, by Thomas M. Badger and Martin J.J. Ronis; (4) Free radicals, adducts, and autoantibodies resulting from ethanol metabolism: Role in ethanol-associated toxicity, by Emanuele Albano; and (5) Gastrointestinal metabolism of ethanol and its possible role in carcinogenesis, by Helmut Seitz.

Effect of common over-the-counter medications on blood alcohol levels

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical and legal significance of the potential pharmacokinetic interaction between common over-the-counter (OTC) medications and alcohol that may result in increased blood alcohol levels (BALs).

DATA SOURCES

A MEDLINE search (1966-February 2000) of English-language articles was performed using the terms aspirin, acetaminophen, histamine (H2)-receptor antagonist, ethanol, and blood alcohol level and then supplemented by a bibliographic review of relevant articles.

STUDY SELECTION AND DATA EXTRACTION

Two H2-receptor antagonist studies using methodologies representative of other published trials and a meta-analysis of 24 H2-receptor antagonist trials were chosen for detailed review. All identified studies examining aspirin and acetaminophen were addressed.

DATA SYNTHESIS

More than 30 studies have examined the potential interaction between OTC drugs and blood alcohol. Because this issue has important medical and legal implications for patients, prescribing physicians, and pharmaceutical manufacturers, a critical analysis of the literature addressing this potential interaction is presented.

CONCLUSIONS

Numerous factors arguing against a clinically significant interaction were identified. First, data from the relevant studies cannot be extrapolated to the general population because of the multitude of variables that determine an individual's BAL. Also, a publication bias for small studies (< or = 10 subjects) finding a statistically significant increase in peak BAL was observed. In addition, study results supporting an increase in BAL were often irreproducible when these trials were repeated under similar conditions. Finally, although some studies detected statistically significant increases in peak BAL, these changes were often clinically irrelevant.

Alcohol levels are increased in social drinkers receiving ranitidine

OBJECTIVE

Ranitidine increases blood alcohol concentrations by decreasing the first pass metabolism of ethanol. The effect of ranitidine on alcohol levels has been found to be variable when using large doses of alcohol or conditions in which its first pass metabolism is known to be minimal. Despite a consensus that the drug increases alcohol levels after small doses of ethanol, this effect has been considered inconsequential, because of the low alcohol levels. However, social drinking comprises repetitive consumption of small doses of alcohol and the ranitidine effect could thereby be potentiated.

METHODS

To study this factor, alcohol levels were determined by breath analysis in nine men (social drinkers), after four drinks of 0.15 g/kg ethanol given postprandially every 45 min, before and after ranitidine (150 mg b.i.d. for 7 days).

RESULTS

Their blood alcohol increased with repeated doses, reaching peak values of 24+/-3 mg/dl before ranitidine and 33+/-2 after ranitidine (p = 0.04). In seven of the nine subjects blood alcohol exceeded 25 mg/dl, a level at which impairment of judgment and of finely tuned skills occurs and which exceeds legal limits of driving in some European countries. Moreover, the high levels persisted for a longer time with than without the drug. These effects were associated with a 62% decrease in first pass metabolism.

CONCLUSION

Under conditions mimicking social drinking, ranitidine increases blood alcohol to levels known to impair psychomotor skills needed for driving.

Effects of cimetidine on the pharmacokinetics of proguanil in healthy subjects and in peptic ulcer patients

The pharmacokinetics of orally administered proguanil and its metabolites were determined in six healthy volunteers and in six peptic ulcer patients, before and after a 3-day course of cimetidine (400 mg given two times daily for 2 days and 400 mg on the third day 1 h before proguanil). Cimetidine significantly increased Cmax (P < 0.05), AUCo-alpha (P < 0.005) and elimination half-life t 1/2b of proquanil in plasma of healthy subjects. In ulcer patients, cimetidine significantly increased, AUCo-alpha (P < 0.05), elimination half life (P < 0.005) and Cmax. Cimetidine significantly reduced (P < 0.05) Total body clearance in both healthy subjects and in peptic ulcer patients. The Cmax and AUCo-alpha of the active metabolite cycloguanil was significantly decreased (P < 0.05) in both the healthy subjects and in the peptic ulcer patients. The Cmax of the inactive metabolite, 4-CPB was significantly decreased in healthy subjects and AUCo-alpha significantly decreased in peptic ulcer patients.

Is there an interaction between H2-antagonists and alcohol?

H2-antagonists are commonly prescribed drugs and alcohol use is widespread in the community. Any possible interaction may be important because of the frequent co-administration of both drugs and the potential for unexpected impairment of pyschomotor function, in particular, driving skills. Hepatic ADH is the major site of alcohol metabolism. ADH is also found in the stomach, but it is uncertain whether gastric ADH is able to metabolise a significant amount of alcohol in vivo. Significant first-pass metabolism can be demonstrated at lower doses of alcohol, and if alcohol is given after meals. Varying degrees of extraction of alcohol from the portal circulation probably explains the data regarding first pass metabolism rather than gastric metabolism by gastric ADH. H2-receptor antagonists inhibit gastric ADH activity to a variable extent. If gastric metabolism of alcohol is negligible then this inhibition has no relevance. Given the uncertainty regarding a mechanism of interaction, only carefully conducted studies in controlled environments will answer the question. The large inter-subject variability of alcohol absorption means that any study which seeks to determine the effect of an H2-receptor antagonist on ethanol metabolism must have sufficient numbers. A cross-over design, with each subject acting as his own control, is preferable to avoid ascribing an effect to treatment rather than to chance. The alcohol dosing studies are reviewed and the results summarised according to dose of alcohol given. At a dose of 0.15 g/kg of alcohol, four commonly used H2-antagonists may cause a small increase in blood alcohol concentrations in certain conditions. This absolute increase is very small. The magnitude of effect is far less than the effect of taking a meal before alcohol. At doses of 0.3 g/kg and above the majority of evidence favours no interaction between H2-antagonists and alcohol. There is no interaction at doses that would be expected to impair psychomotor skills (above 25 mg/dl). There remains a question regarding the cumulative effect of repeated small doses of alcohol and further studies are required. The relationship between ethanol absorption and gastric emptying raises the possibility that the effects of H2-receptor antagonists observed at very low doses of alcohol may be due to the acceleration of gastric emptying by these drugs. This is an attractive hypothesis that explains many aspects of the debate, but studies of the effect of H2-antagonists on gastric emptying have been conflicting.

Gastritis in the alcoholic: relationship to gastric alcohol metabolism and Helicobacter pylori

Chronic gastritis is common in the alcoholic. It is characterized by histological inflammation of the gastric mucosa and is associated with variable symptomatology. Its etiology is still the subject of debate. Recently, a new alcohol dehydrogenase isoenzyme, called sigma ADH, absent from the liver but predominant in the upper GI tract, has been fully characterized, its gene cloned, and it appears to play a major role in gastric ethanol metabolism. Indeed, it has now been established, both in vivo in experimental animals and in vitro in cultured human gastric cells, that alcohol is metabolized in the gastric mucosa, resulting in the production of acetaldehyde, a toxic metabolite. In addition, Helicobacter pylori infection is common in the alcoholic, resulting in the breakdown of urea to ammonia, another toxic product. A number of studies carried out over the last 40 years revealed that antibiotic treatment eradicates ammonia production and results in histological and symptomatic improvement in the majority of patients with alcoholic gastritis. Non-invasive tests for the detection of H. pylori are now available which will facilitate the large scale studies needed to confirm whether, in H. pylori -positive patients, antibiotics should become routine treatment for alcoholic gastritis.

Effect of histamine-2 receptor antagonists on blood alcohol levels: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect, if any, of histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) on serum alcohol levels under various conditions including type of H2RA receptor antagonist, alcohol dose, and fed status of the subject.

STUDY DESIGN

Meta-analysis of the published literature.

DATA SOURCES

Studies were identified by MEDLINE (January 1982 through December 1997) using the key words H2 receptor antagonists and alcohol. Other studies were identified by reviewing bibliographies of retrieved articles and by discussion with colleagues.

STUDY SELECTION

Studies were selected if they involved the coadministration of H2RAs and alcohol in healthy, human volunteers. Studies that may have addressed this goal but were performed in another context, for instance the measurement of ulcer healing, were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted on the design, number of participants, participant characteristics, type and dose of H2RA administered, serum alcohol levels (measured as Cmax) along with standard deviations, dose of alcohol received, and fed or fasted status of participants. Alcohol dose was arbitrarily divided into low dose (< or = 0.5 g/kg body weight) versus high dose (> 0.5 g/kg body weight). In addition, studies involving ranitidine and cimetidine were stratified by sample size into small (n < or = 10) versus not small (n > 10).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Twenty-four trials met selection criteria. Small elevations in Cmax were noted when cimetidine (2.71 mg/DL; 95% confidence internal [CI] 1.60, 3.83) or ranitidine (6.95 mg/DL; 95% CI 5.83, 8.08) were coadministered with alcohol. No such differences were noted for famotidine (0.28 mg/DL; 95% CI -1.24, 1.80) or nizatidine (2.33 mg/DL;, 95% CI -0.06, 4.72). The elevation detected with cimetidine and ranitidine was most pronounced in smaller studies (n < 10). Separate analyses investigating the effect of alcohol dose and fed or fasted status of participants revealed no clinically important differences.

CONCLUSIONS

Cimetidine and ranitidine, but not the other H2RAs, can cause small elevations of serum alcohol level when alcohol and drug are administered concurrently. Studies with larger numbers of participants were less likely to demonstrate this effect. Relative to accepted, legal definitions of intoxication, the effect of any H2RA on blood alcohol level is unlikely to be clinically relevant.

Omeprazole, ranitidine, and cimetidine have no effect on peak blood ethanol concentrations, first pass metabolism or area under the time-ethanol curve under 'real-life' drinking conditions

BACKGROUND

Considerable controversy persists over the influence of H2-receptor antagonists on the first pass clearance of ethanol. The majority of previously published studies have studied the effects of the drugs on low-dose ethanol in the fasting state. We elected to study the possible interaction under simulated real-life conditions.

METHODS

Twenty-three volunteers were given 0.6 g/kg body weight ethanol in the form of 4.8% beer following a standardized meal. Blood ethanol levels were measured over the next 3 h. Studies were repeated using ethanol administered as an intravenous infusion while subjects consumed the same volume of de-alcoholized beer. The effects of a minimum of 2 weeks of dosing with cimetidine, ranitidine and omeprazole were examined.

RESULTS

Following food, and with ethanol taken in the form of beer, mean first pass metabolism of ethanol was 58% (range 34-78%). No statistically significant difference was found following drug treatment in either percentage first pass metabolism, peak blood ethanol concentration or area under the time-blood ethanol curve.

CONCLUSION

Under these 'real-life' conditions, the concomitant administration of cimetidine, ranitidine or omeprazole is unlikely to have significant physical, social or forensic implications, since they do not significantly change ethanol elimination.

Gastrointestinal alcohol dehydrogenase

Alcohol dehydrogenase (ADH) consists of a family of isozymes that convert alcohols to their corresponding aldehydes using NAD+ as a cofactor. The metabolism of ethanol by gastrointestinal ADH isozymes results in the production of acetaldehyde, a highly toxic compound that binds to cellular protein and DNA if not further metabolized to acetate by acetaldehyde dehydrogenase isozymes. Acetaldehyde seems to be involved in ethanol-associated cocarcinogenesis. The metabolism of retinol and the generation of retinoic acid is a function of class I and class IV ADH, and its inhibition by alcohol may lead to an alteration of epithelial cell differentiation and cell growth and may also be involved in ethanol-associated gastrointestinal cocarcinogenesis.

Metabolism of ethanol and some associated adverse effects on the liver and the stomach

Current knowledge of alcohol oxidation and its effects on hepatic metabolism and its toxicity are summarized. This includes an evaluation of the relationship of the level of consumption to its interaction with nutrients (especially retinoids, carotenoids, and folate) and the development of various stages of liver disease. Ethanol metabolism in the stomach and its link to pathology and Helicobacter pylori is reviewed. Promising therapeutic approaches evolving from newly gained insight in the pathogenesis of medical complications of alcoholism are outlined. At present, the established approach for the prevention and treatment of alcoholism are outlined. At present, the established approach for the prevention and treatment of alcoholic liver injury is to control alcohol abuse, with the judicial application of selective antioxidant therapy, instituted at early stages, prior to the social or medical disintegration of the patient, and associated with antiinflammatory agents at the acute phase of alcoholic hepatitis. In addition, effective antifibrotic therapy may soon become available.

Gastric ethanol metabolism and gastritis: interactions with other drugs, Helicobacter pylori, and antibiotic therapy (1957-1997)--a review

The stomach provides some protection against the penetration of ethanol into the body by contributing to the metabolism of ethanol. The latter is attenuated by various drugs and, although the magnitude of this effect is still the subject of debate, patients should be warned of the corresponding possible increase in blood alcohol levels. Furthermore, oxidation of ethanol generates acetaldehyde, a toxic metabolite. In addition, chronic alcohol abuse seems to favor colonization by Helicobacter pylori, which produces ammonia that also contributes to the commonly associated chronic gastritis. Because antibiotics were shown over the last 4 decades to effectively eliminate gastric ammonia, they should be considered for the routine treatment of such chronic gastritis in the way they are now being used for ulcer therapy.

Use of measurements of ethanol absorption from stomach and intestine to assess human ethanol metabolism

Controversy exists concerning the site (stomach vs. liver) and magnitude of first-pass metabolism of ethanol. We quantitated gastric and total ethanol absorption rates in five male subjects and utilized these measurements to evaluate first-pass metabolism. Gastric emptying of ethanol (0.15 g/kg) was determined via a gamma camera and gastric absorption from the ratio of gastric ethanol to [14C]polyethylene glycol. Gastric absorption accounted for 30% and 10% of ethanol administered with food and water, respectively. With food, estimated gastric mucosal ethanol concentrations fell from 19 to 5 mM over 2 h. Calculations using these concentrations and kinetic data for gastric alcohol dehydrogenase showed <2% of the dose underwent gastric metabolism. Application of observed ethanol absorption rates to a model of human hepatic ethanol metabolism indicated that only 30% and 4% of the dose underwent first-pass metabolism when administered with food and water, respectively. We conclude that virtually all first-pass ethanol metabolism occurs in the liver and first-pass metabolism accounts for only a small fraction of total clearance.

Pharmacokinetic interactions between alcohol and other drugs

The frequent use of alcohol (ethanol) together with prescription drugs gives any described pharmacokinetic interaction significant clinical implications. The issue is both the effect of alcohol on the pharmacokinetics of various drugs and also the effect of those drugs on the pharmacokinetics of alcohol. This review discusses these pharmacokinetic interactions but also briefly describes some other effects of alcohol that are clinically relevant to drug prescribing. The use of several different study designs may be required before we can confidently state the presence or absence of any alcohol-drug interaction. Short term administration of alcohol in volunteers is the most common study design but studies of social drinking and prolonged moderate alcohol intake can be important in some situations. Community-based studies may illustrate the clinical relevance of any interaction. Alcohol can affect the pharmacokinetics of drugs by altering gastric emptying or liver metabolism (by inducing cytochrome P450 2E1). Drugs may affect the pharmacokinetics of alcohol by altering gastric emptying and inhibiting gastric alcohol dehydrogenase. The role of gastric alcohol dehydrogenase in the first-pass metabolism of alcohol is reviewed in this article and the arguments for and against any potential interaction between alcohol and H2 receptor antagonists are also discussed. The inhibition of the metabolism of acetaldehyde may cause disulfiram-like reactions. Pharmacodynamic interactions between alcohol and prescription drugs are common, particularly the additive sedative effects with benzodiazepines and also with some of the antihistamine drugs; other interactions may occur with tricyclic antidepressants. Alcohol intake may be a contributing factor to the disease state which is being treated and may complicate treatment because of various pathophysiological effects (e.g. impairment of gluconeogenesis and the risk of hypoglycaemia with oral hypoglycaemic agents). The combination of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and alcohol intake increases the risk of gastrointestinal haemorrhage.

The effect of cimetidine on ethanol concentrations in fasting women and men after two different doses of alcohol

BACKGROUND

Serum ethanol concentrations may become higher when alcohol is consumed during treatment with histamine receptor antagonists, especially if ethanol is ingested postprandially. Only a few studies have investigated fasting subjects, and women have only been investigated sporadically.

METHODS

The present study compared serum ethanol concentrations after a 4-h fast followed by a low (0.15 g/kg) and a high (0.45 g/kg) dose of ethanol, on two separate occasions in six women and six men. The study was carried out before and after treatment with 400 mg cimetidine twice daily.

RESULTS

Cimetidine administration did not change the area under the concentration-time curve or the maximal serum ethanol concentration in either women or men, irrespective of ethanol dose. Ethanol elimination rate was unchanged by cimetidine.

CONCLUSION

Cimetidine does not influence the ethanol concentration-time curve when ethanol is ingested on an empty stomach.

Ethanol metabolism, cirrhosis and alcoholism

Alcohol-induced tissue damage results from associated nutritional deficiencies as well as some direct toxic effects, which have now been linked to the metabolism of ethanol. The main pathway involves liver alcohol dehydrogenase which catalyzes the oxidation of ethanol to acetaldehyde, with a shift to a more reduced state, and results in metabolic disturbances, such as hyperlactacidemia, acidosis, hyperglycemia, hyperuricemia and fatty liver. More severe toxic manifestations are produced by an accessory pathway, the microsomal ethanol oxidizing system involving an ethanol-inducible cytochrome P450 (2E1). After chronic ethanol consumption, there is a 4- to 10-fold induction of 2E1, associated not only with increased acetaldehyde generation but also with production of oxygen radicals that promote lipid peroxidation. Most importantly, 2E1 activates many xenobiotics to toxic metabolites. These include solvents commonly used in industry, anaesthetic agents, medications such as isoniazid, over the counter analgesics (acetaminophen), illicit drugs (cocaine), chemical carcinogens, and even vitamin A and its precursor beta-carotene. Furthermore, enhanced microsomal degradation of retinoids (together with increased hepatic mobilization) promotes their depletion and associated pathology. Induction of 2E1 also yields increased acetaldehyde generation, with formation of protein adducts, resulting in antibody production, enzyme inactivation, decreased DNA repair, impaired utilization of oxygen, glutathione depletion, free radical-mediated toxicity, lipid peroxidation, and increased collagen synthesis. New therapies include adenosyl-L-methionine which, in baboons, replenishes glutathione, and attenuates mitochondrial lesions. In addition, polyenylphosphatidylcholine (PPC) fully prevents ethanol-induced septal fibrosis and cirrhosis, opposes ethanol-induced hepatic phospholipid depletion, decreased phosphatidylethanolamine methyltransferase activity and activation of hepatic lipocytes, whereas its dilinoleoyl species increases collagenase activity. Current clinical trials with PPC are targeted on susceptible populations, namely heavy drinkers at precirrhotic stages.

Reversion by histamine H2-receptor antagonists of plasma membrane alterations in ethanol-induced gastritis

Ethanol administration rapidly damages surface epithelial cells of rat stomach, leading to altered cellular plasma membranes. Histamine H2-receptor antagonists (H2RA) have been shown to have preventive properties against ethanol-induced gastric mucosal injury. Therefore, the possible reverting properties of H2RA (cimetidine, ranitidine, and famotidine) were tested in ethanol-induced gastritis. Subchronic ethanol administration elicited a histological profile of gastritis and alterations at the plasma membrane level (diminution of some phospholipids, increased cholesterol, and decreased activity of 5'-nucleotidase). H2RA administration to rats with gastritis promptly corrected the ethanol-induced mucosal damage. In addition, cytosolic enzyme activities (alcohol and lactate dehydrogenases) were also modified by gastritis and treatment with H2RA. In conclusion, our data suggest that H2RA improved restitution of the gastric mucosa contributing to the healing process of the gastric damage. The latter indicates reverting properties of H2RA on gastric damage, as well as their cytoprotective effect already described.

Gastric emptying and first-pass metabolism of ethanol in elderly subjects with and without atrophic gastritis

BACKGROUND

Oral ethanol intake results in lower blood ethanol concentrations than intravenous administration of the same dose of ethanol. This first-pass metabolism is thought to be due to gastric metabolism of ethanol via alcohol dehydrogenase and also to hepatic first-pass metabolism.

METHODS

Since a loss of gastric mucosa may decrease first-pass metabolism of ethanol, this metabolism was studied in 10 elderly subjects (6 women and 4 men) with atrophic gastritis and bacterial overgrowth and in 17 control subjects with normal gastric secretory function. Atrophic gastritis was verified by means of the serum pepsinogen I to pepsinogen II ratio and the hypochlorhydria occurring after pentagastrin stimulation. Bacterial overgrowth was assessed by bacteria. In addition, gastric emptying rates of ethanol solution with technetium-99m sulfur colloid were calculated from scintigraphic images. Furthermore, gastric biopsy specimens were taken from 12 female patients with atrophic gastritis and from 12 controls for determination of alcohol dehydrogenase activity.

RESULTS

Neither gender (female versus male, 28 +/- 5% versus 42 +/- 5%), atrophic gastritis (normal versus atrophic gastritis, 35 +/- 4% versus 32 +/- 6%), nor tetracycline treatment in atrophic gastritis subjects (before versus after, 32 +/- 6% versus 41 +/- 5%) had a statistically significant effect on the first-pass metabolism of ethanol in the elderly. Gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity was significantly lower in atrophic gastritis subjects than in controls (p < 0.01). A significant correlation was found between the first-pass metabolism of ethanol in healthy controls and gastric half-emptying time (p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude from these data that the rate of gastric emptying modulates first-pass metabolism of ethanol in elderly individuals.

Effects of cimetidine on blood ethanol levels after alcohol ingestion and genetic polymorphisms of sigma-alcohol dehydrogenase in Japanese

Administration of cimetidine, an H2-receptor antagonist increases blood alcohol concentrations. This has been attributed to decreased gastric first-pass metabolism of ethanol caused by cimetidine's inhibitory effect on gastric alcohol dehydrogenase (sigma-ADH) activity. Molecular studies on sigma-ADH showed that a point mutation might occur at position 287 (G --> T) of the sigma-ADH gene in Japanese deficient type of sigma-ADH activity. To clarify the relationship between first-pass metabolism of ethanol and polymorphism of sigma-ADH, we analyzed the nucleotide sequence at positions 287 and 294 of sigma-ADH in 11 individuals who were administered ethanol orally before and after treatment with cimetidine. Higher blood ethanol levels after cimetidine administration were found in 4 of 11 cases (group A), whereas high blood ethanol levels were observed in 7 of 11 cases (B group), irrespective of cimetidine administration. Genetic polymorphisms at position 287 and 294 were not observed in all subjects. Even in 59 Japanese men with various alcoholic liver diseases, no polymorphisms at position 287 were observed by restriction-length polymorphisms with Avail digestion after polymerase chain reaction.

Effect of ethanol on nitrite oxidation in the perfused rat liver

The effect of ethanol on nitrite oxidation was investigated in the perfused rat liver. Real-time spectral changes in catalase were obtained using a reflectance scanning spectrophotometer in rat liver perfused with Krebs-Henseleit bicarbonate buffer in a non-recirculating system. The nitrite oxidation rate and nitrate production rate were calculated from the differences in concentrations between the influx and efflux perfusates and from the flow rate/g liver weight. Nitrite infusion caused an increase in absorbance difference delta A (640-660 nm), indicating decomposition of catalase compound I to the free form. Administration of ethanol during the nitrite infusion caused a further increase in delta A (640-660 nm) and significant decreases in both the nitrite oxidation rate and the nitrate production rate. Both the nitrite oxidation rate and nitrate production rate decreased, depending on the concentration of ethanol administered. At 10 mM ethanol, they reached about half the rates before the ethanol infusion. In conclusion, ethanol inhibits nitrite oxidation by catalase in the perfused rat liver at relatively low concentrations that can be realized in blood by daily alcohol consumption.

Interactions between alcohol and other drugs

More than 75% of people age 65 and older use medications. Of the drugs most commonly used by older people, many have potential to interact adversely with alcohol. The absorption, distribution, metabolism, and effects of drugs or alcohol may be affected. The major adverse clinical outcomes of drug-alcohol interactions are altered blood levels of the medication or of alcohol, liver toxicity, gastrointestinal inflammation and bleeding, sedation and delirium, disulfiram-like reactions, and interference with the desired effect of medications. Since alcohol is commonly used by elderly people, educating patients about the potential for these interactions should be a routine part of health care visits.

First-pass metabolism of alcohol. Absence of diurnal variation and its inhibition by cimetidine after evening meal

To determine whether the first-pass metabolism (FPM) of orally consumed alcohol varies with the time of day, 12 healthy male subjects were tested with both oral and intravenous alcohol (0.3 g/kg), in the morning and evening, always 1 hr after the same standard meal. The results revealed no significant differences in FPM (81.6 +/- 11.6 vs 92.8 +/- 10.6 mg/kg) or in any other index of alcohol absorption and metabolism. Eleven subjects were also tested in the evening after treatment with cimetidine, an H2-antagonist that inhibits gastric alcohol dehydrogenase activity in vitro. Compared to baseline, cimetidine (1 g/day for eight days) significantly decreased FPM (from 100.1 +/- 8.0 to 52.6 +/- 11.4 mg/kg, P < 0.01) and increased the systemic bioavailability of alcohol (from 66 +/- 3 to 82 +/- 4%, P < 0.01), as well as peak blood alcohol concentrations (from 4.3 +/- 0.4 to 5.9 +/- 0.5 mM, P < 0.05) and areas under the curve (from 5.1 +/- 0.5 to 7.0 +/- 0.5 mM/hr, P < 0.01). The results indicate the absence of diurnal variation in FPM and suggest that patients given cimetidine should be warned of its possible interaction with alcohol regardless of the time of day.

Inter-individual and intra-individual variability of ethanol concentration-time profiles: comparison of ethanol ingestion before or after an evening meal

1. The magnitude of the variability of ethanol absorption is an important factor for studies that seek to determine the significance of potential interactions between ethanol and drugs. The aim of this study was to determine the extent of inter- and intra-individual variability of ethanol concentration-time profiles in fasted and fed subjects. 2. Twenty-four healthy male subjects were randomized to receive ethanol 0.3 g kg-1 before an evening meal on two study days and ethanol 0.3 g kg-1 after an evening meal on two study days. Plasma ethanol concentrations were measured at intervals from 0-240 min. 3. There were significant differences in the mean area under the ethanol concentration-time curve (AUC), the mean peak ethanol concentration (Cmax), the mean ethanol elimination slope and the time to peak ethanol concentration between the fed and fasted subjects. There were no significant differences between the first and second study days for either fed or fasting subjects for all parameters. 4. There was no statistically significant difference in inter- or intra-subject variance between fed and fasted studies although the coefficients of variation (standard deviation expressed as a percentage of the mean) for the differences between the first and second study day were higher for fed studies. 5. The large inter- and intra-individual variability of alcohol absorption for both fasted and fed subjects must be considered in the design of alcohol-drug interaction studies.

Potential for adverse drug-alcohol interactions among retirement community residents

OBJECTIVES

Medications and alcohol are both used commonly by older people. Thus, the potential for adverse drug-alcohol interactions is very high in this population, but data on actual concurrent use of alcohol and medicines likely to interact with alcohol are lacking. The objectives of this study were to determine the frequency of alcohol and medication use and the potential for specific adverse drug-alcohol interactions in residents of retirement communities.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study using a mailed survey.

SETTING

Three retirement communities in suburban Milwaukee, Wisconsin.

PARTICIPANTS

All 454 independently living residents of the communities were surveyed. Of these, 311 residents (68%) returned completed questionnaires. Mean age of respondents was 83 +/- 6 years, 100% were white, 77% were female.

MEASUREMENTS

The questionnaire included alcohol use questions adapted from the Khavari questionnaire and the CAGE questionnaire to screen for alcohol abuse. Respondents were asked to list all prescription and nonprescription medications.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight percent of the population reported using both alcohol and a high risk medication. Six percent had seven or more drinks per week and took a high risk medication. High risk drugs commonly used by drinkers were antihypertensives in 50%, aspirin in 27%, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs in 20%, medication for congestive heart failure in 18%, antacids or H2 blockers in 16%, sedatives in 11%, narcotics in 5%, and warfarin in 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Concurrent use of alcohol and medications is common in residents of these retirement communities. Many of the drugs taken by regular drinkers have potential for adverse drug-alcohol interactions even at moderate levels of alcohol use. This represents a strong possibility of adverse outcomes and a need for increased awareness on the part of both the public and physicians of the potential for interactions between drugs and alcohol.