A multicenter double-blind study comparing lovastatin and gemfibrozil in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia

Efficacy of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme a reductase inhibitors in the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolemia: a meta-analysis of clinical trials

Recent studies have documented the long-term impact of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG-CoA) reductase inhibitors on mortality and morbidity related to coronary heart disease, establishing the link between lowering cholesterol levels and reducing cardiac events. Our study was a comparative literature review and meta-analysis of the efficacy of four HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors-fluvastatin, lovastatin, pravastatin, and simvastatin-used in the treatment of patients with hypercholesterolemia. The data sources for our meta-analysis of the efficacy of these cholesterol-lowering agents were 52 randomized, double-masked clinical trials with at least 25 patients per treatment arm. The results showed all four agents to be effective in reducing blood cholesterol levels. We computed summary efficacy estimates for all published dose strengths for the four agents. Fluvastatin 20 mg/d reduced low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels by 21.0% and total cholesterol (total-C) levels by 16.4%; fluvastatin 40 mg/d reduced these levels by 23.1% and 17.7%, respectively. Lovastatin 20 mg/d reduced LDL-C levels by 24.9% and total-C levels by 17.7%; lovastatin 80 mg/d reduced these levels by 39.8% and 29.2%, respectively. Pravastatin 10 mg/d reduced LDL-C levels by 19.3% and total-C levels by 14.0%; pravastatin 80 mg/d reduced these levels by 37.7% and 28.7%, respectively. Simvastatin 2.5 mg/d reduced LDL-C levels by 22.9% and total-C levels by 15.7%; simvastatin 40 mg/d reduced these levels by 40.7% and 29.7%, respectively. The results of our meta-analysis can be used in conjunction with treatment objectives and comparative cost-effectiveness data for these agents to decide appropriate therapeutic alternatives for individual patients.

Comparison of the efficacy of simvastatin and standard fibrate therapy in the treatment of primary hypercholesterolemia and combined hyperlipidemia

Five multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies were conducted in France to compare the efficacy and safety of once-daily simvastatin treatment (10-40 mg/day) with conventional therapy with gemfibrozil 900 mg/day, ciprofibrate 100 mg/day, bezafibrate 400 mg/day, and fenofibrate 300 or 400 mg/day in a total of 800 patients with hypercholesterolemia. Simvastatin was associated with statistically significantly greater (p < or = 0.01) mean percent reductions in plasma low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol compared with each of the five fibrate regimens, even when administered at its recommended starting dose of 10 mg/day. Furthermore, approximately 90% of patients treated once daily with simvastatin experienced an at least 20% decrease in plasma LDL cholesterol compared with only 36 to 68% of patients treated with the individual fibrate agents (p < or = 0.05). The effectiveness of simvastatin in reducing LDL cholesterol did not differ as a function of the baseline plasma concentrations of total cholesterol or triglycerides. In contrast, the effectiveness of fibrate therapy in lowering plasma LDL cholesterol levels was significantly diminished (p < or = 0.05) among patients with triglyceride concentrations > 1.7 mmol/l. Plasma high-density lipoprotein (HDL) cholesterol levels were increased by approximately 10% after treatment with simvastatin or the fibrates. Although fibrate therapy was more effective overall in lowering plasma triglyceride levels, the effectiveness of simvastatin in reducing plasma triglyceride levels was generally 2- to 4-fold greater in patients with hypercholesterolemia associated with triglyceride levels > or = 2.3 mmol/l than in those with hypercholesterolemia associated with triglyceride levels < 2.3 mmol/l. The results of these studies confirm the superiority of simvastatin to standard fibrate therapy in reducing plasma levels of total and LDL cholesterol. They further indicate that once-daily treatment with simvastatin is effective in patients with isolated hypercholesterolemia or hypercholesterolemia associated with elevated triglyceride levels.

Effects of lovastatin on ApoA- and ApoB-containing lipoproteins. Families in a subpopulation of patients participating in the Monitored Atherosclerosis Regression Study (MARS)

To establish whether lovastatin, an inhibitor of 3-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl coenzyme A (HMG CoA) reductase, exhibits a specific effect on apolipoprotein (apo) A- and apoB-containing lipoproteins, 63 subjects, a subset of the 270 Monitored Atherosclerosis Regression Study (MARS) patients with hypercholesterolemia (190 to 295 mg/dL) and documented coronary artery disease, were randomized into either lovastatin 40 mg twice daily or matching placebo tablets twice daily. Both groups consumed a diet containing 27% calories as fat (polyunsaturated fat/saturated fat ratio, 2.85) and a daily cholesterol intake of less than 250 mg. The plasma lipid and apolipoprotein profiles were determined at the time of randomization and after 2 years of treatment, and the levels of apoA- and apoB-containing lipoprotein families were measured after 2 years of treatment. After this treatment period, the drug group was characterized in comparison with the placebo group by significantly reduced levels of total cholesterol (33%), triglycerides (30%), very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (36%), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (43%), apoB (36%), apoC-III (18%), and apoE (17%) and slightly but insignificantly increased levels of high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (6%) and apoA-I (1%). The 2-year levels of lipoprotein containing apoA-I but no apoA-II (LpA-I) and lipoprotein containing both apoA-I and apoA-II (LpA-I/A-II) particles separated by immunoaffinity chromatography on an anti-apoA-II immunosorber did not differ between the two treatment groups. However, the apoB-containing lipoprotein (Lp) families defined by apolipoprotein composition and separated by immunoaffinity chromatography on anti-apoA-II and anti-apoC-III immunosorbers were affected in a selective manner.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Comparison of lipid-lowering effects of low-dose fluvastatin and conventional-dose gemfibrozil in patients with primary hypercholesterolemia

A total of 123 patients with primary hypercholesterolemia were randomized on a 2:1 ratio to receive either fluvastatin at 20 mg once daily at night (n = 82) or gemfibrozil at 600 mg twice daily (n = 41) in a double-blind, double-dummy comparison of the effects on plasma lipid parameters and tolerability over 8 weeks. All patients had either low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) concentrations > or = 160 mg/dL (4.1 mmol/L) in association with definite coronary artery disease (CAD) or > or = 2 risk factors, or LDL-C > or = 190 mg/dL (4.9 mmol/L) with no CAD and < 2 risk factors. All had triglyceride (TG) levels < or = 350 mg/dL (4.0 mmol/L). After 8 weeks of treatment, fluvastatin produced significant reductions from baseline of 17.4% (p < 0.001) in LDL-C, 13.2% (p < 0.001) in total cholesterol (TC), 13.8% (p < 0.001) in very low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (VLDL-C), and 6.4% (NS) in TG. High-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) was increased by 5.6% (p < 0.001), and the ratio of LDL-C:HDL-C (Friedewald) was decreased by 21.2% (p < 0.001). Gemfibrozil reduced LDL-C by 15.8%, TC by 13.4%, VLDL-C by 32.2%, LDL-C:HDL-C by 24.8%, and TG by 34.2%, and increased HDL-C by 13.9% (all changes were statistically significant, p < 0.001) compared with baseline. Gemfibrozil produced significantly greater changes in VLDL-C (p < 0.01), HDL-C (p < 0.001), and TG (p < 0.001), but not in LDL-C: HDL-C, compared with fluvastatin. Both drugs significantly reduced apolipoprotein (apo) B and lipoparticles (Lp) E:B, and increased apo A-I but had divergent effects on LpA-I (increased with fluvastatin and reduced with gemfibrozil; p < 0.05). At the end of the study, 43.8% of fluvastatin patients and 45% of gemfibrozil patients achieved a reduction of > 20% in LDL-C levels. Normalization of LDL-C levels was achieved (according to European Atherosclerosis Society guidelines) by 13.4% of fluvastatin- and 14.6% of gemfibrozil-treated patients. Both drugs were well tolerated; adverse events occurred in 36.6% of fluvastatin recipients compared with 58.5% of patients taking gemfibrozil. No clinically notable elevations of aspartate or alanine aminotransferases, alkaline phosphatase, or creatine phosphokinase occurred. No patient developed new or worsening lens opacities associated with a reduction in optically corrected visual acuity. The most commonly reported adverse events were headache and gastrointestinal upset. There were no serious drug-related adverse events.