S4-alpha mRNA translation repression complex. I. Thermodynamics of formation

Frameshifting RNA pseudoknots: structure and mechanism

Programmed ribosomal frameshifting (PRF) is one of the multiple translational recoding processes that fundamentally alters triplet decoding of the messenger RNA by the elongating ribosome. The ability of the ribosome to change translational reading frames in the −1 direction (−1 PRF) is employed by many positive strand RNA viruses, including economically important plant viruses and many human pathogens, such as retroviruses, e.g., HIV-1, and coronaviruses, e.g., the causative agent of severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS), in order to properly express their genomes. −1 PRF is programmed by a bipartite signal embedded in the mRNA and includes a heptanucleotide “slip site” over which the paused ribosome “backs up” by one nucleotide, and a downstream stimulatory element, either an RNA pseudoknot or a very stable RNA stem–loop. These two elements are separated by six to eight nucleotides, a distance that places the 5′ edge of the downstream stimulatory element in direct contact with the mRNA entry channel of the 30S ribosomal subunit. The precise mechanism by which the downstream RNA stimulates −1 PRF by the translocating ribosome remains unclear. This review summarizes the recent structural and biophysical studies of RNA pseudoknots and places this work in the context of our evolving mechanistic understanding of translation elongation. Support for the hypothesis that the downstream stimulatory element provides a kinetic barrier to the ribosome-mediated unfolding is discussed.

FljA-mediated posttranscriptional control of phase 1 flagellin expression in flagellar phase variation of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhimurium

Flagellar phase variation of Salmonella is a phenomenon where two flagellin genes, fliC (phase 1) and fljB (phase 2), are expressed alternately. This is controlled by the inversion of a DNA segment containing the promoter for the fljB gene. The fljB gene constitutes an operon with the fljA gene, which encodes a negative regulator for fliC expression. Previous biochemical analysis suggested that phase variation might depend on alternative synthesis of phase-specific flagellin mRNA (H. Suzuki and T. Iino, J. Mol. Biol. 81:57-70, 1973). However, recently reported results suggested that FljA-dependent inhibition might be mediated by a posttranscriptional control mechanism (H. R. Bonifield and K. T. Hughes, J. Bacteriol. 185:3567-3574, 2003). In this study, we reexamined the mechanism of FljA-mediated inhibition of fliC expression more carefully. Northern blotting analysis revealed that no fliC mRNA was detected in phase 2 cells. However, only a moderate decrease in beta-galactosidase activity was observed from the fliC-lacZ transcriptional fusion gene in phase 2 cells compared with that in phase 1 cells. In contrast, the expression of the fliC-lacZ translational fusion gene was severely impaired in phase 2 cells. The half-life of fliC mRNA was shown to be much shorter in phase 2 cells than in phase 1 cells. Purified His-tagged FljA protein was shown to bind specifically to fliC mRNA and inhibit the translation from fliC mRNA in vitro. On the basis of these results, we propose that in phase 2 cells, FljA binds to fliC mRNA and inhibits its translation, which in turn facilitates its degradation.

Translational repression mechanisms in prokaryotes

Translational repression results from a complex choreography of macromolecular interactions interfering with the formation of translational initiation complexes. The relationship between the rate and extent of formation of these interactions to form repressed mRNA complexes determines the extent of repression. A novel analysis of repression mechanisms is presented here and it indicates that the reversibility of repressed complex formation influences the steady state balance of the distribution of translationally active and inactive complexes and therefore has an impact on the efficiency of repression. Reviewed here is evidence for three distinct translational repression mechanisms, regulating expression of the transcription factor sigma32, threonine tRNA synthetase and ribosomal proteins on the alpha operon in Escherichia coli. Efficient regulation of expression in these systems makes use of specific mRNA structures in quite different ways.

Translational repression of the Escherichia coli alpha operon mRNA: importance of an mRNA conformational switch and a ternary entrapment complex

Ribosomal protein S4 represses synthesis of the four ribosomal proteins (including itself) in the Escherichia coli alpha operon by binding to a nested pseudoknot structure that spans the ribosome binding site. A model for the repression mechanism previously proposed two unusual features: (i) the mRNA switches between conformations that are "active" or "inactive" in translation, with S4 as an allosteric effector of the inactive form, and (ii) S4 holds the 30 S subunit in an unproductive complex on the mRNA ("entrapment"), in contrast to direct competition between repressor and ribosome binding ("displacement"). These two key points have been experimentally tested. First, it is found that the mRNA pseudoknot exists in an equilibrium between two conformers with different electrophoretic mobilities. S4 selectively binds to one form of the RNA, as predicted for an allosteric effector; binding of ribosomal 30 S subunits is nearly equal in the two forms. Second, we have used S4 labeled at a unique cysteine with either of two fluorophores to characterize its interactions with mRNA and 30 S subunits. Equilibrium experiments detect the formation of a specific ternary complex of S4, mRNA pseudoknot, and 30 S subunits. The existence of this ternary complex is unambiguous evidence for translational repression of the alpha operon by an entrapment mechanism.

The solution structure of ribosomal protein S4 delta41 reveals two subdomains and a positively charged surface that may interact with RNA

S4 is one of the first proteins to bind to 16S RNA during assembly of the prokaryotic ribosome. Residues 43-200 of S4 from Bacillus stearothermophilus (S4 Delta41) bind specifically to both 16S rRNA and to a pseudoknot within the alpha operon mRNA. As a first step toward understanding how S4 recognizes and organizes RNA, we have solved the structure of S4 Delta41 in solution by multidimensional heteronuclear nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy. The fold consists of two globular subdomains, one comprised of four helices and the other comprised of a five-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet and three helices. Although cross-linking studies suggest that residues between helices alpha2 and alpha3 are close to RNA, the concentration of positive charge along the crevice between the two subdomains suggests that this could be an RNA-binding site. In contrast to the L11 RNA-binding domain studied previously, S4 Delta41 shows no fast local motions, suggesting that it has less capacity for refolding to fit RNA. The independently determined crystal structure of S4 Delta41 shows similar features, although there is small rotation of the subdomains compared with the solution structure. The relative orientation of the subdomains in solution will be verified with further study.

The crystal structure of ribosomal protein S4 reveals a two-domain molecule with an extensive RNA-binding surface: one domain shows structural homology to the ETS DNA-binding motif

We report the 1.7 A crystal structure of ribosomal protein S4 from Bacillus stearothermophilus. To facilitate the crystallization, 41 apparently flexible residues at the N-terminus of the protein have been deleted (S4Delta41). S4Delta41 has two domains; domain 1 is completely alpha-helical and domain 2 comprises a five-stranded antiparallel beta-sheet with three alpha-helices packed on one side. Domain 2 is an insertion within domain 1, and it shows significant structural homology to the ETS domain of eukaryotic transcription factors. A phylogenetic analysis of the S4 primary structure shows that the likely RNA interaction surface is predominantly on one side of the protein. The surface is extensive and highly positively charged, and is centered on a distinctive canyon at the domain interface. The latter feature contains two arginines that are totally conserved in all known species of S4 including eukaryotes, and are probably crucial in binding RNA. As has been shown for other ribosomal proteins, mutations within S4 that affect ribosome function appear to disrupt the RNA-binding sites. The structure provides a framework with which to probe the RNA-binding properties of S4 by site-directed mutagenesis.

Effects of Mg2+, K+, and H+ on an equilibrium between alternative conformations of an RNA pseudoknot

A complex pseudoknot structure surrounds the first ribosome initiation site in the Escherichia coli alpha mRNA and mediates its regulation by ribosomal protein S4. A 112 nt RNA fragment containing this pseudoknot exists in two conformations that are resolvable by gel electrophoresis below room temperature. Between 30 degrees C and 45 degrees C the conformers reach thermodynamic equilibrium on a time scale ranging from one hour to one minute, and the interconversion between conformers is linked to H+, K+ and Mg2+ concentrations. Mg2+ favors formation of the "fast" electrophoretic form: a single Mg2+ is bound in the rate-limiting step, followed by cooperative binding of approximately 1.7 additional ions. Binding of the latter ions provides most of the favorable free energy for the reaction. However, the "slow" form binds about the same number of Mg ions, albeit more weakly, so that saturating Mg2+ concentrations drive the equilibrium to only approximatley 70% fast form. A single H+ is taken up in the switch to the "slow" conformer, which has apparent pK approximately 5.9; low pH also stabilizes part of the pseudoknot structure melting at approximately 62 degrees C. Mg2+ and H+ appear to direct alpha mRNA folding by relatively small (10 to 100-fold) differences in their affinities for alternative conformers. K+ has very little effect on the conformational equilibrium, but at high concentrations accelerates interconversion between the conformers. The alpha mRNA conformational switch is similar in its slow kinetics, large activation energy, and Mg2+ dependence of the equilibrium constant to slow steps in the folding of tRNA, group I introns, and RNase P RNA tertiary structures, though it differs from these in the association of a single Mg2+ with the rate-limiting step.

Messenger RNA recognition by fragments of ribosomal protein S4

Ribosomal protein S4 from Escherichia coli binds a large domain of 16 S ribosomal RNA and also a pseudoknot structure in the alpha operon mRNA, where it represses its own synthesis. No similarity between the two RNA binding sites has been detected. To find out whether separate protein regions are responsible for rRNA and mRNA recognition, proteins with N-terminal or C-terminal deletions have been overexpressed and purified. Protein-mRNA interactions were detected by (i) a nitrocellulose filter binding assay, (ii) inhibition of primer extension by reverse transcriptase, and (iii) a gel shift assay. Circular dichroism spectra were taken to determine whether the proteins adopted stable secondary structures. From these studies it is concluded that amino acids 48-104 make specific contacts with the mRNA, although residues 105-177 (out of 205) are required to observe the same toeprint pattern as full-length protein and may stabilize a specific portion of the mRNA structure. These results parallel ribosomal RNA binding properties of similar fragments (Conrad, R. C., and Craven, G. R. (1987) Nucleic Acids Res. 15, 10331-10343, and references therein). It appears that the same protein domain is responsible for both mRNA and rRNA binding activities.

Interaction of polypyrimidine tract binding protein with the encephalomyocarditis virus mRNA internal ribosomal entry site

Translation of encephalomyocarditis virus (EMCV) mRNA occurs in a cap-independent manner, requiring instead a cis-acting element termed the internal ribosomal entry site (IRES). Binding of a 57-kDa ribosome-associated protein (p57) to the EMCV IRES has been found to correlate with cap-independent translation. p57 has recently been reported to be very similar, if not identical, to the polypyrimidine tract binding protein (pPTB), a spliceosome-associated factor possibly involved in U2 snRNP/pre-mRNA complex formation of 3'-splice-site recognition. The interaction between purified pPTB and the EMCV IRES was characterized in this study using nitrocellulose filter binding and UV cross-linking assays. pPTB bound the EMCV IRES with high affinity (Kd = 40 nM at 25 degrees C, pH 5.5, 80 mM ionic strength). pPTB also bound strongly to RNA fragments containing either the 5'-end, 3'-end, or an internal stem-loop of the IRES. The binding properties of 16 RNA variants derived from the IRES revealed however that purified pPTB bound with less specificity than pPTB in a mixture of cytoplasmic HeLa cell polypeptides. The addition of HeLa extract to purified pPTB increased the binding specificity, suggesting that factors within the extract alter the binding specificity of pPTB. The binding of pPTB to the full-length IRES and three IRES-derived fragments was studied in detail. Complex formation was optimal at low pH and was driven entirely by entropy. As many as four ion pairs are formed upon binding, with electrostatic interactions accounting for approximately 35% of the total free energy of complex formation.

Allosteric mechanism for translational repression in the Escherichia coli alpha operon

The ribosomal protein S4 is a translational repressor that binds to a complex mRNA pseudoknot structure containing the ribosome binding site for the first gene of the alpha operon. Either 30S subunits or S4 protein bound to the mRNA causes Moloney murine leukemia virus reverse transcriptase to pause near the 3' terminus of the pseudoknot. There is no competition between subunits and S4 for mRNA binding. The kinetics of forming S4-30S-mRNA complexes are biphasic, and the fraction of mRNA molecules reacting more rapidly decreases as the temperature is increased from 30 degrees C to 40 degrees C. The complex cannot be detected with mRNA mutants that cannot be repressed. We have previously shown similar kinetic behavior for the formation of tRNA(fMet) initiation complexes with tRNA(fMet), 30S subunits, and mRNA, except that the fraction reacting rapidly increases when the temperature is increased over the same 30-40 degrees C range. Thus the two sets of experiments show that there are two forms of 30S-mRNA complexes that differ in their abilities to bind S4 and tRNA(fMet). The results support an allosteric model for translational repression in which S4 traps the mRNA in a conformation able to bind 30S subunits but unable to form an initiation complex with tRNA(fMet).

Mutational analysis of the RNA pseudoknot component of a coronavirus ribosomal frameshifting signal

The genomic RNA of the coronavirus IBV contains an efficient ribosomal frameshift signal at the junction of the overlapping 1a and 1b open reading frames. The signal is comprised of two elements, a heptanucleotide "slip-site" and a downstream tertiary RNA structure in the form of an RNA pseudoknot. We have investigated the structure of the pseudoknot and its contribution to the frameshift process by analysing the frameshifting properties of a series of pseudoknot mutants. Our results show that the pseudoknot structure closely resembles that which can be predicted from current building rules, although base-pair formation at the region where the two pseudoknot stems are thought to stack co-axially is not a pre-requisite for efficient frameshifting. The stems, however, must be in close proximity to generate a functional structure. In general, the removal of a single base-pair contact in either stem is sufficient to reduce or abolish frameshifting. No primary sequence determinants in the stems or loops appear to be involved in the frameshift process; as long as the overall structure is maintained, frameshifting is highly efficient. Thus, small insertions into the pseudoknot loops and a deletion in loop 2 that reduced its length to the predicted functional minimum did not influence frameshifting. However, a large insertion (467 nucleotides) into loop 2 abolished frameshifting. A simple stem-loop structure with a base-paired stem of the same length and nucleotide composition as the stacked stems of the pseudoknot could not functionally replace the pseudoknot, suggesting that some particular conformational feature of the pseudoknot determines its ability to promote frameshifting.

Preferential binding of yeast tRNA ligase to pre-tRNA substrates

Joining of tRNA halves during splicing in extracts of Saccharomyces cerevisiae requires each of the three enzymatic activities associated with the tRNA ligase polypeptide. Joining is most efficient for tRNA as opposed to oligonucleotide substrates and is sensitive to single base changes at a distance from splice sites suggesting considerable specificity. To examine the basis for this specificity, binding of ligase to labeled RNA substrates was measured by native gel electrophoresis. Ligase bound tRNA halves with an association constant 1600-fold greater than that for a nonspecific RNA. Comparison of binding of a series of tRNA processing intermediates revealed that tRNA-structure, particularly in the region around the splice sites, contributes to specific binding. Finally, the ligase was shown to form multiple, discrete complexes with tRNA substrates. The basis for recognition by ligase and its role in a tRNA processing pathway are discussed.

Cloning and analysis of the Bacillus subtilis rpsD gene, encoding ribosomal protein S4

The rpsD gene, encoding ribosomal protein S4, was isolated from Bacillus subtilis by hybridization with oligonucleotide probes derived from the S4 amino-terminal protein sequence. Sequence analysis of the cloned DNA indicated that rpsD is likely to be monocistronic, in contrast to Escherichia coli rpsD, which is located in the alpha operon and is the translational regulator for alpha operon ribosomal protein gene expression in E. coli. The cloned gene was shown to map at position 263 degrees on the B. subtilis chromosome, at the position to which mutations conferring alterations in the electrophoretic mobility of protein S4 were localized. A promoter was identified upstream of the rpsD coding sequence; initiation of transcription at this promoter would result in a transcript containing a leader region 180 bases in length. Immediately downstream of the rpsD coding region were two sequences resembling transcriptional terminators. An open reading frame homologous to tyrosyl-tRNA synthetase (tyrS) genes was identified downstream of rpsD but in the opposite orientation. The leader region of rpsD mRNA is predicted to have extensive secondary structure, resembling a region of B. subtilis 16S rRNA where S4 is likely to bind; similar mRNA features have been found to be important in ribosomal gene regulation in E. coli. These results provide the first steps toward analysis of the regulation of rpsD gene expression in B. subtilis.

Target site of Escherichia coli ribosomal protein S15 on its messenger RNA. Conformation and interaction with the protein

The regulatory site of ribosomal protein S15 has been located in the 5' non-coding region of the messenger, overlapping with the ribosome loading site. The conformation of an in vitro synthesized mRNA fragment, covering the 105 nucleotides upstream from the initiation codon and the four first codons of protein S15, has been monitored using chemical probes and RNase V1. Our results show that the RNA is organized into three domains. Domains I and II, located in the 5' part of the mRNA transcript, are folded into stable stem-loop structures. The 3'-terminal domain (III), which contains the Shine-Dalgarno sequence and the AUG initiation codon, appears to adopt alternative conformations. One of them corresponds to a rather unstable stem-loop structure in which the Shine-Dalgarno sequence is paired. An alternative potential structure involves a "pseudo-knot" interaction between bases of this domain and bases in the loop of domain II. The conformation of several RNA variants has also been investigated. The deletion of the 5'-proximal stem-loop structure (domain I), which has no effect on the regulation, does not perturb the conformation of the two other domains. The deletion of domain II, leading to a loss of regulatory control, prevents the formation of the potential helix involved in the pseudo-knot structure and results in a stabilization of the alternative stem-loop structure in domain III. The replacement of another base in domain III involved in pairing in the two alternative structures mentioned above should induce a destabilization of both structures and results in a loss of the translational control. However, the replacement of another base in domain III, which does not abolish the control, results in the loss of the conformational heterogeneity in this domain and yields a stable conformation corresponding to the pseudo-knot structure. Thus, it appears that any mutation that disrupts or alters the formation of the pseudo-knot impairs the regulatory mechanism. Footprinting experiments show that protein S15 is able to bind to the synthesized fragment and provide evidence that the protein triggers the formation of the pseudo-knot conformation. A mechanism can be postulated in which the regulatory protein stabilizes this particular structure, thus impeding ribosome initiation.

Thermodynamics of protein-RNA recognition in a highly conserved region of the large-subunit ribosomal RNA

Ribosomal protein L11 from Escherichia coli specifically binds to a highly conserved region of 23S ribosomal RNA. The thermodynamics of forming a complex between this protein and several different rRNA fragments have been investigated, by use of a nitrocellulose filter binding assay. A 57-nucleotide region of the RNA (C1052-U1108) contains all the protein recognition features, and an RNA fragment containing this region binds L11 10(3)-10(4)-fold more tightly than tRNA. Binding constants are on the order of 10 microM-1 and are only weakly dependent on K+ concentration (delta log K/delta log [K+] = -1.4) or temperature. Binding requires multivalent cations; Mg2+ is taken up into the complex with an affinity of approximately 3 mM-1. Other multivalent cations tested, Ca2+ and Co(NH3)63+, promote binding nearly as well. The pH dependence of binding is a bell-shaped curve with a maximum near neutral pH, but the entire curve is shifted to higher pH for the smaller of two RNA fragments tested. This result suggests that the smaller fragment favors a conformation stabilizing protonated forms of the RNA recognition site and is potentially relevant to a hypothesis that this rRNA region undergoes an ordered series of conformational changes during the ribosome cycle.

S4-16 S ribosomal RNA complex. Binding constant measurements and specific recognition of a 460-nucleotide region

The region of the Escherichia coli 16 S ribosomal RNA recognized by the ribosomal protein S4 has been defined by assaying a set of 13 16 S rRNA fragments for S4 binding. The fragments were prepared by transcription in vitro, and binding constants were measured in three ways: retention of labeled RNA fragments on nitrocellulose filters by S4; co-sedimentation of labeled S4 with RNA fragments in sucrose gradients; and the distribution of labeled S4 between two RNAs of different sizes in a sucrose gradient. All three methods gave similar relative binding strengths for a variety of 16 S rRNA and non-specific (23 S rRNA) sequences, with the exception of two of the largest 16 S rRNA fragments; these gave smaller association constants in the filter retention assay than in the other methods. We found that specific complexes of S4 with these larger RNAs do not bind well to filters, leaving non-specific complexes to dominate the assay. Specific complexes with RNAs less than or equal to 891 nucleotides were retained efficiently by S4 on filters, and gave reliable binding constants. All 16 S rRNA fragments containing nucleotides 39 to 500 bound S4 with the same affinity as intact 16 S rRNA, while all fragments with endpoints within 39 to 500 bound at least tenfold more weakly. This sequence must be able to fold independently of the rest of the rRNA. Comparison of this minimal 462-nucleotide S4 binding site with S4 footprinting results suggests that S4 binding might alter the conformations of RNA neighboring the 39 to 500 region in the intact 16 S rRNA. Specific S4-rRNA binding is not sensitive to KCl concentration, but a more normal salt dependence is seen in K2SO4 (delta logK/delta log[K+] approximately -3.3). This duplicates the behavior of the specific S4-alpha mRNA translational repression complex, arguing that S4 recognizes both the mRNA and rRNA substrates by the same mechanism. Mg2+ is not required to form the specific rRNA complex, at least under conditions which stabilize RNA structure (0.35 M-KCl, 5 degrees C).

How do proteins recognize specific RNA sites? New clues from autogenously regulated ribosomal proteins

Some ribosomal proteins which bind specifically to ribosomal RNA also act as translational repressors and recognize their encoding messenger RNAs. The messenger- and ribosomal-RNA binding sites for four of these proteins are now well defined, and striking similarities in primary and secondary structure are apparent in most cases. These 'consensus' structures are useful clues to the features proteins use to recognize specific RNAs.

Unusual mRNA pseudoknot structure is recognized by a protein translational repressor

Translation of ribosomal proteins in the alpha operon of E. coli is repressed by one of the encoded proteins, S4; it specifically recognizes an RNA fragment containing the translational initiation site for the first gene in the operon. RNA structure mapping experiments have suggested a pseudoknot structure for the S4 binding site: the loop of a hairpin is base paired to sequences downstream of the hairpin. Here, we systematically test this proposed structure by measuring S4 binding to an extensive set of site-directed mutations that create compensatory base pair changes in potential helices. The pseudoknot folding is confirmed, and two additional, unexpected interactions within the pseudoknot are also detected. The overall structure is an unusual "double pseudoknot" linking a hairpin upstream of the ribosome binding site with sequences 2-10 codons downstream of the initiation codon. Stabilization of this structure by S4 could account for translational repression.

S4-alpha mRNA translation regulation complex. II. Secondary structures of the RNA regulatory site in the presence and absence of S4

The secondary structure of the Escherichia coli alpha mRNA leader sequence has been determined using nucleases specific for single- or double-stranded RNA. Three different length alpha RNA fragments were studied at 0 degrees C and 37 degrees C. A very stable eight base-pair helix forms upstream from the ribosome initiation site, defining a 29 base loop. There is evidence for base-pairing between nucleotides within this loop and for a "pseudo-knot" interaction of some loop bases with nucleotides just 3' to the initiation codon, forming a region of complex structure. A weak helix also pairs sequences near the 5' terminus of the alpha mRNA with bases near the Shine-Dalgarno sequence. Affinity constants for the translational repressor S4 binding different length alpha mRNA fragments indicate that most of the S4 recognition features must be contained within the main helix and hairpin regions. Binding of S4 to the alpha mRNA alters the structure of the 29 base hairpin region, and probably melts the weak pairing between the 5' and 3' termini of the leader. The pseudo-knot structure and the conformational changes associated with it provide a link between the structures of the S4 binding site and the ribosome binding site. The alpha mRNA may therefore play an active role in mediating translational repression.

Regulation of alpha operon gene expression in Escherichia coli. A novel form of translational coupling

The alpha operon of Escherichia coli contains the genes for ribosomal proteins S13, S11, S4, RNA polymerase subunit alpha, and r-protein L17, in this order. Previous studies have shown that translation of all four ribosomal proteins is regulated by S4, and that binding of S4 to the mRNA at the start site for S13 translation is probably responsible for the regulation of translation of S13, S11 and S4. The alpha gene is "unique" in that it is located between the genes for two ribosomal proteins (S4 and L17) and yet appears to be regulated independently of them. In the present studies, we have measured the synthesis rates of all the alpha operon proteins under a variety of physiological conditions. Our results confirm that alpha gene expression is regulated independently of the co-transcribed ribosomal protein genes and is relatively insensitive to translational feedback repression by S4. S1 nuclease analysis of alpha operon mRNA failed to reveal the presence of any unique transcription start or mRNA cleavage that leads to separation of the alpha cistron from preceding ribosomal protein cistrons. Therefore, it appears that differential regulation of alpha synthesis takes place at the level of mRNA translation. We have also carried out a deletion analysis of the alpha operon leader and identified a region of the alpha operon leader mRNA that is required for regulation by S4. Furthermore, deletion of this region results in increased synthesis of L17 together with S13, S11 and S4, whereas alpha synthesis did not increase significantly. Therefore, we conclude that interaction of S4 with this single target site results in translational repression of not only the proximal three cistrons for S13, S11 and S4 but also that of the last cistron, L17, without affecting the intervening alpha cistron.