Intestinal button implantation for obstipation and fecal impaction in children

The impact of transcutaneous electrical stimulation therapy on appendicostomy operation rates for children with chronic constipation--a single-institution experience

PURPOSE

Appendicostomy for antegrade continence enema is a minimally invasive surgical intervention that has helped many children with chronic constipation. At our institution, since 2006, transcutaneous electrical stimulation (TES) has been trialed to treat slow-transit constipation (STC) in children. This retrospective audit aimed to determine if TES use affected appendicostomy-formation rates and to monitor changes in practice. We hypothesized that appendicostomy rates have decreased for STC but not for other indications.

METHODS

Appendicostomy-formation rate was determined for the 5 years before and after 2006. Children were identified as STC or non-STC from nuclear transit scintigraphy and patient records.

RESULTS

Since 1999, 317 children were diagnosed with STC using nuclear transit scintigraphy with 121 during 2001 to 2005 (24.2/year) and 147 during 2006 to 2010 (29.4/year). Seventy-four children had appendicostomy formation. For 2001 to 2005, appendicostomy-formation rates for STC and non-STC children were similar: 5.4 per year (n = 27) and 4.8 per year (n = 24), respectively. For 2006 to 2010, appendicostomy-formation rates were 1.2 per year (n = 6) for STC and 3.2 per year (n = 16) for non-STC (χ(2), P = .04).

CONCLUSION

Since 2006, appendicostomy-formation rates have significantly reduced in STC but not in non-STC children at our institute, coinciding with the introduction of TES as an alternative treatment for STC. Transcutaneous electrical stimulation has not been tested on non-STC children in this period.

Endoscopically placed caecostomy buttons: a trial ACE procedure

The use of the antegrade continence enema (ACE) is becoming more widespread. Preliminary studies have been promising, but the procedure is not universally successful. A colonoscopic insertion of a caecostomy button is a relatively minor procedure. This allows the ACE to be used for a trial period to assess whether a permanent procedure would be beneficial. If successful, enemas can be continued by the caecostomy, or a formal ACE can be performed. We report a series of five patients who underwent staged endoscopic insertion of a MIC-KEY caecostomy button, and we discuss the technical aspects of the procedure.

Laparoscopic antegrade continence enema using a two-port technique

BACKGROUND

The antegrade continence enema is an effective method of treatment of fecal incontinence. We report our experience of a laparoscopic antegrade continence enema procedure and describe a simple approach to this procedure using a two-port technique.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Over a 3-year period, 12 children with intractable constipation and fecal soiling underwent the antegrade continence enema procedure laparoscopically. All cases had full bowel preparation the day before surgery. This procedure was done through one 5-mm camera port and two 5-mm working ports in 8 cases, and using the camera port and only one additional 5-mm working port in 4 cases. The appendix was used in 5 cases and the cecum in 3 cases with the threeport technique while the appendix was used in all 4 cases with the two-port technique. The appendix or cecum was delivered extracorporeally through the 5-mm port site in the right lower quadrant. The mucocutaneous anastomosis was stented using a gastrostomy button.

RESULTS

Between 2001 and 2004, 12 children (10 male, 2 female) underwent a laparoscopic antegrade continence enema procedure at a median age of 10.5 years (range, 7-14 years). This procedure was easy to perform and no case required conversion to an open procedure. The wash-outs via the MIC-KEY gastrostomy button (MIC-KEY, Kimberly-Clark) were commenced at a median of 3.5 days (range, 1-5 days). Median postoperative hospital stay was 2 days (range, 1-5 days). This procedure was effective in completely resolving fecal incontinence in 9 cases and partially resolving it in 3 cases. There were no episodes of stomal stenosis, leakage, or herniation. However, one case required a revision of antegrade continence enema due to wound breakdown and leakage of irrigation fluid around the stoma. The median follow-up period was 15.5 months (range, 5-32 months).

CONCLUSION

The laparoscopic technique is a simple and effective approach in creating an antegrade continence enema. The use of a gastrostomy button can potentially reduce some of the complications commonly associated with an antegrade continence enema. We describe a procedure that incorporates the advantages of both laparoscopy and a button device, which is simple and easy to perform using just two ports.

The antegrade continence enema successfully treats idiopathic slow-transit constipation

BACKGROUND

Antegrade continence enemas (ACEs) are successful for constipation and/or fecal incontinence caused by anorectal malformations or spina bifida but have been thought to be less successful in the treatment for patients with colonic dysmotility. We studied the long-term efficacy of ACE in a large group of patients with idiopathic slow-transit constipation (STC).

METHODS

We identified 56 children with an appendicostomy for ACE with radiologically proven STC. An independent investigator (SKK) performed confidential telephone interviews.

RESULTS

We assessed 42 of 56 children (31 boys) of mean age 13.1 years (range, 6.9-25). Mean follow-up was at 48 months (range, 3-118). Mean symptom duration before appendicostomy was 7.5 years (range, 1.4-17.4). Indications for appendicostomy were soiling (29/42), inadequate stool evacuation (7/42), and recurrent hospital admissions for nasogastric washouts (6/42). Both quality of life (Templeton quality of life [P < .0001]) and continence (modified Holschneider continence score [P < .0001]) improved with ACE. Soiling frequency decreased in 32 of 42 (11/32 completely continent). Thirty-seven of 42 children had reduced abdominal pain severity (P < .0001) and frequency (P < .0001). Complications included granulation tissue (33/42), stomal infection (18/42), and washout leakage (16/42). Fifteen of 42 children ceased using the appendicostomy (7/15 symptoms resolved). Thirty-five of 42 families felt that their aspirations had been met.

CONCLUSIONS

Antegrade continence enemas were successful in 34 (81%) of 42 children with STC, contradicting views that ACEs are less effective in patients with colonic dysmotility.

Surgical management of chronic unremitting constipation and fecal incontinence associated with megarectum: A preliminary report

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE

Functional constipation with associated fecal incontinence responds poorly to medical management once megarectum has developed. The authors describe resecting the dilated rectum and inserting a cecostomy button for antegrade enemas in this difficult condition.

METHODS

Four children, ages 9 to 15 years, with a history of unremitting constipation and fecal incontinence were referred for evaluation after not responding to medical management. All patients had exhibited normal lumbosacral magnetic resonance images (MRI) and open rectal biopsies; however, all 4 patients had a megarectum on contrast enema. In addition, anorectal manometry was consistent with functional fecal retention. The dilated rectum was resected by anastamosing the nondilated sigmoid colon to the distal rectum, and a standard gastrostomy button was inserted into the cecum for antegrade enemas. Mean follow-up was 35 months (range, 8 to 60 months).

RESULTS

Constipation and incontinence resolved within 6 months in all patients, and all children remained continent without the aid of cathartic agents. There were no postoperative episodes of fecal impaction. The only complication was antibiotic-associated diarrhea in 1 patient. Cecostomy buttons were removed at 1 year postplacement in all 4 patients with continued success. Three patients underwent repeat anorectal manometry; all 3 had normal rectal sensory threshold volumes and anorectal inhibitory reflexes. Barium studies also were obtained in the 3 patients without evidence of recurrent rectal dilation.

CONCLUSIONS

Refractory constipation and incontinence associated with megarectum may be amenable to surgical intervention in selected patients. The authors' limited experience suggests that proctectomy and button cecostomy is an effective treatment option that improves the quality of life in these patients. Furthermore, proctectomy alone may be curative.

Y-appendicoplasty: a technique to minimize stomal complications in antegrade continence enema

PURPOSE

The antegrade continence enema (ACE) is an effective method of treatment of fecal incontinence and constipation. However, the original procedure described is not easy to perform and is associated with a high complication rate, especially stomal stenosis-necrosis (55%). Even with introduction of orthotopic appendicostomy, composite series still report an incidence of 30% with stomal problems. The authors report a virtually complication-free simple modification, the Y-appendicoplasty.

METHODS

The base of the appendix is imbricated into cecum by 2 successive rows of interrupted seromuscular stitches. A small Y-shaped incision is made on the abdominal wall at McBurney's point, and 3 triangular skin flaps are raised. The appendix is brought out of the skin incision. The tip is excised, and 3 vertical cuts are made 120 degrees apart. The 3 appendiceal flaps thus created are interdigitated with the skin flaps using interrupted sutures.

RESULTS

Twelve children underwent Y-appendicoplasty and orthotopic appendicostomy. Mean operating time was 1 hour. None experienced stomal complications that required intervention. Control of fecal continence with ACE ranged from excellent to good.

CONCLUSION

Y-appendicoplasty and orthotopic appendicostomy minimizes complications for ACE and is easy to perform.

The antegrade continence enema procedure: a review of the literature

Since the antegrade continence enema (ACE) was first described in 1990 for fecal incontinence, more than 100 cases have been reported in the literature. This report reviews the indications, operative modifications, outcome, and complications of the procedure.

Laparoscopic appendicostomy for management of fecal incontinence

Fecal incontinence from any cause is a socially unacceptable condition and a major detriment to educational and psychosocial development in young people with certain disabilities. Recently several procedures have been described that allow antegrade colonic enemas in the treatment of this problem. We report here an additional method of establishing this proximal colon access, namely laparoscopic appendicostomy. Although not applicable to all patients, this procedure has been successful in a select group with excellent results, and we recommend its consideration when open surgery is not otherwise required.

Percutaneous cecostomy: a new technique in the management of fecal incontinence

A pilot study on the percutaneous introduction of a cecostomy tube for colonic irrigations in the treatment of children with fecal incontinence is described. The results were good, and the technique is recommended for certain patients.

A prospective randomized study with mineral oil and oral lavage solution for treatment of faecal impaction in children

Faecal impaction with or without encopresis is a very common problem. We performed a randomized, open-label, prospective study to compare the efficacy and acceptability of the treatment of faecal impaction using either mineral oil or pineapple-flavoured isotonic intestinal lavage solution containing polyethylene glycol-3350 (Colyte). Thirty-six patients over 2 years of age were randomized to receive either mineral oil or flavoured lavage solution. The dose of mineral oil was 2 to 8 tablespoons twice a day for two days (17 patients--Group I) and of lavage solution was 20 ml/kg/h for 4 hours on two consecutive days (19 patients--Group II). The patients were assessed for the presence of abdominal faecal masses, presence and consistency of rectal mass, perineal soiling before and two days after either of the randomly assigned treatment. The patients and parents were asked regarding the compliance with treatment, side-effects, number of bowel movements after treatment and willingness to try similar treatment if faecal impaction recurred. Patients in the lavage group had more frequent bowel movements, and showed more effective clearance of abdominal and rectal lumps (P < 0.01) at the time of repeat examination at two days. However, they had some vomiting and were less compliant (P < 0.01) when compared to mineral oil patients. We conclude that balanced lavage solution effectively relieves faecal impaction, however, compliance with its use is poorer than that with mineral oil.