Contraceptive use and attitudes in reunified Germany

Male or female sterilization - the decision making process: Counselling and regret

OBJECTIVE(S)

To analyze the decision-making process of both male and female sterilization in order to improve counselling and prevent regret after sterilization in the future.

STUDY DESIGN

An online questionnaire regarding sterilization (counselling, sources of information and regret) was promoted on Facebook, Twitter and LinkedIn. A total of 1107 men and women who had undergone or considered sterilization in the Netherlands filled in the questionnaire.

RESULTS

A total of 88.9 % of the sterilized group and 67.4 % in the considered group responded that they felt well informed when they considered sterilization. However, less than half of the participants in both groups knew about all different sterilization methods. In both groups participants reported they consulted their partner the most when they considered sterilization. After sterilization 7.7 % reported having regret. Regret was reported more often when participants were sterilized ≤ 30 years. Most important reasons for regret reported by males were complications, pain, a new wish to conceive and divorce/remarriage. Most important reasons for regret reported by females were pain, complications, a new wish to conceive and menstrual symptoms. A total of 21.1 % in the sterilized and 38.0 % in the considered group responded they would have liked to use a decision aid when they considered sterilization.

CONCLUSIONS

Findings of this study provide insight in the decision-making process regarding sterilization. There is a lack of knowledge of different methods of sterilization and 7.7% regrets their sterilization afterwards. Furthermore, the results show an importance of developing a decision aid for couples considering sterilization.

The French pill scare and the reshaping of social inequalities in access to medical contraceptives

While the consequences of various "pill scares" have been relatively well-documented in the public health literature revealing a drop in pill use and a rise in unplanned pregnancies and abortion rates, researchers rarely considered that these controversies would affect women contraceptive practices differently according to their social background. Indeed, social differentiations in reaction to "pill scares" could contribute to reinforce the social gradient in the use of contraceptive methods and choice of visiting the health professionals who prescribe them. These could contribute to an increase in health inequalities on access to contraceptive methods. Using data from three state nationally representative cross-sectional surveys conducted in France in 2010, 2013 and 2016, we studied the changes in women's contraceptive uses around the French "pill scare" that occurred in 2012-2013. We focused on the changes in the use of all contraceptives available under medical prescription (called medical contraceptives) on one hand, and on each specific method (pill, IUD, implant, patch or vaginal ring, and female sterilization) on the other hand according to the women's social background. We saw a social gradient in contraceptives changes. The decline in the use of contraceptive methods available under medical prescription was particularly marked for women from lower and higher classes in which we observe a decrease in pill use between 2010 and 2013, whereas it was observed only between 2013 and 2016 among middle class women. Moreover, while some women from upper class shifted from pill to IUD between 2010 and 2013, this was not the case for their less privileged counterparts. As a consequence, it seems that the French "pill scare" led to the reshaping of social inequalities in access to medical contraceptives.

Power and the gendered division of contraceptive use in Western European couples

Recent research has approached contraceptive use, or "fertility work", as another household task that is primarily managed by women. Building on the theoretical frameworks of relative resource theory and gender perspectives, this study investigates the association between partners' power (measured as their relative education, division of housework and decision-making) and the choice of male versus female, or no contraception. Data from the Generations and Gender Survey for four Western European countries (Austria, Belgium, France and Germany; 2005-2010) are used to examine the hypotheses with multinomial logistic diagonal reference models. The results show that man's and woman's educational level are equally important predictors for a couple's contraceptive method choice. Furthermore, the findings suggest that households in which the man performs more housework or the woman has more say in decisions are more likely to rely on male methods or female sterilization, rather than on the more commonly used female reversible methods.

Ready, Willing, and Able: Contraceptive Use Patterns Across Europe

An "East-West" divide in contraceptive use patterns has been identified across Europe, with Western European countries characterized by the widespread use of modern contraception, and Central and Eastern European countries characterized by a high prevalence of withdrawal, the rhythm method, or abortion. Building on the Ready-Willing-Able framework, this study aims to gain more insight into the micro- and macro-level socioeconomic, cultural, and technological determinants underlying contraceptive use. Data from the Generations and Gender Survey (2004-2011) covering four Western and seven Central and Eastern European countries are used, and multinomial multilevel analyses are performed. Results reveal that individuals who intend to delay parenthood are more likely to use any contraceptive method, whereas holding more traditional values and having a lower socioeconomic status are associated with a higher likelihood of using no or only traditional methods. Regional reproductive rights and gender equality interact in complex ways with these associations. At minimum, our results underline the complexity of the processes underlying the persistent difference in contraceptive use across Europe.

The perplexing links between contraceptive sterilization and (dis)advantage in ten low-fertility countries

This study investigated the association between contraceptive sterilization and socio-economic status (measured by educational attainment) in ten countries, using data from the 2006-10 National Survey of Family Growth and the 2004-10 Generations and Gender Surveys. The findings confirm that a long-standing association between socio-economic status and sterilization persists in the contemporary United States: female sterilization is associated with economic disadvantage, whereas male sterilization is associated with economic advantage. The latter association is found to be unique to the United States, but female sterilization is associated with disadvantage in most of the other countries studied. While basic demographic background factors such as early childbearing and parity can explain the observed associations in most of the countries, a strong gendered association between sterilization and socio-economic status remains in the United States and Belgium even after adjusting for these factors.

Do women and providers value the same features of contraceptive products? Results of a best-worst stated preference experiment

OBJECTIVES

To determine how women and physicians rate individual characteristics of contraceptives.

METHODS

Discrete choice experiments are used in health economics to elicit preferences for healthcare products. A choice experiment uses hypothetical scenarios to determine which individual factors influence choice. Women and general practitioners (GPs) were shown individual characteristics of contraceptives, not always matching existing methods, and chose the best and worst features.

RESULTS

Two hundred women, mean age 36, 71% using contraception, were presented with descriptions of 16 possible methods and asked to indicate their preference for individual characteristics. One hundred and sixty-two GPs, mostly women, also completed 16 descriptions. Longer duration of action was most favoured by both, followed by lighter periods with less pain or amenorrhoea. The least attractive features for women were heavier and more painful periods, high cost, irregular periods, low efficacy (10% failure) and weight gain of 3 kg. GPs ranked a 10% pregnancy rate as least attractive followed by heavy painful periods and a 5% failure rate.

CONCLUSION

Women and GPs differed in their ranking of contraceptive characteristics. Long duration of use, high efficacy, minimal or no bleeding without pain, were preferred by both. Very undesirable were heavy periods especially with pain, and low efficacy.

Contraceptive use and behavior in the 21st century: a comprehensive study across five European countries

OBJECTIVE

The choice of currently available contraceptive methods has increased considerably in recent years, offering women of reproductive age a variety of different methods dependent on their needs and lifestyle. In order to determine the pattern of use of current methods in contraception, a survey was conducted in a large population of women drawn from five European countries (France, Germany, Italy, Spain and the United Kingdom).

METHOD

More than 12,000 randomly selected women, aged 15-49 years, were interviewed using a standardized questionnaire which addressed the use of current methods of contraception. The responses were analyzed for the total study population, and, where appropriate, by country and age.

RESULTS

An oral contraceptive (OC) was confirmed as the most widely used method of contraception for women in the European study population, with an estimated 22 million users in the five countries. Women using an OC reported very high levels of satisfaction (>90%). Male and female sterilization were the main methods of contraception in women aged 40 years and older. One-half of the women had undergone their sterilization before the age of 35 years. More than 50% of the women who had undergone sterilization had not been adequately informed and counselled about alternative reversible contraceptive options. No method of contraception was being used currently by 23% of the European study population, and unreliable methods of contraception (including cap/diaphragm, chemical, and natural and withdrawal methods) were being used by a further 6% of the population. Although valid reasons (e.g. not in a sexual relationship, wish to become pregnant) were given by many women who were not using contraception, there still remains a large number of women who need counselling regarding the importance of using reliable contraceptive methods. The number of women aged 15-49 years in the five European countries who are considered at risk of an unwanted pregnancy is estimated to be 4.7 million (6.5%).

CONCLUSIONS

Differences in the use pattern of contraceptive methods were demonstrated that emphasize the social and cultural differences between the countries. The findings in the current study can be used as a baseline from which to monitor trends in contraceptive use and behavior in subsequent studies.

Use of contraceptive methods in Spain: results of a national survey☆

We conducted a personal interview of 2136 Spanish women aged 15 to 49 years with the aim of determining the contraceptive attitudes of this population. A stratified random sampling was performed to select the women who were to be interviewed, and this sampling design ensured adequate representation of the sample in Spain. At the time of the survey, only 1296 of the 2136 women used some type of contraceptive method (60.6%); the most commonly used method was the condom. The major reason given by the 840 women not using contraceptive methods was the absence of sexual intercourse. Nearly 25% of the Spanish women aged 15-49 years reported that they have no sexual relations.

Women's satisfaction with birth control: a population survey of physical and psychological effects of oral contraceptives, intrauterine devices, condoms, natural family planning, and sterilization among 1466 women

User satisfaction and the physical and psychological effects of five commonly used contraceptive methods were investigated in a population survey among 1466 West German women. The focus was on effects attributed by current and past users to these methods, rather than objectively assessed effects, to shed further light on personal experiences that are highly relevant to the user but often remain unknown to prescribers and unreported in the medical literature. Within the overall sample, 1303 women were surveyed concerning their current or past use of oral contraceptives (OC), 996 regarding condoms, 342 with respect to intrauterine devices (IUD), 428 in regard to natural family planning (NFP), and 139 in relation to sterilization (respondents completed questions about each method used). It emerged that satisfaction was greatest with sterilization (92% of users), followed by OC (68% of ever users), IUD (59%), NFP (43%), and condoms (30%). Almost one in three NFP users had experienced an unwanted pregnancy during use of this method, as compared with one in 20 OC and condom users. The majority of users reported no mood changes during use of the methods studied. The percentages reporting negative mood changes (various items were scored) were up to 16% among OC users, 23% among condom users, and 30% among NFP users. The latter observations suggested that subjective side effects of a contraceptive agent on mood generally reflected, at least in part, the user's sense of confidence in the method concerned (notably, with regard to efficacy and safety). Oral contraceptives, IUD, and sterilization had a broadly positive impact on sex life, whereas that of condoms was often negative. Whereas OC users often reported less heavy and painful menstruation (in up to 56% of cases), IUD were associated with heavier, prolonged, and more painful menstruation (in up to 65% of cases), as also was sterilization, although to a lesser extent (in up to 32% of cases). Overall, the study findings indicated that OC and sterilization had less negative impact on physical and psychological functioning than the other methods studied, in contrast to what the general public often believes.

Contraceptive methods: knowledge sources rated by women and men

People today live amid a welter of information regarding contraception, and health care professionals have been the most prominent sources to which people turn. This study evaluates the relative importance of various information sources and ascertains the position of the physicians among them. Random samples (393 women and 395 men) were drawn from the Finnish population. Response rates were 56% for women and 45% for men. The respondents were asked to estimate the amount of knowledge they had obtained from various sources on a visual analog scale. The three most important sources for women were literature, physicians, and women's journals. For men, literature and the spouse/partner were the most prominent. The youngest age groups--women and men alike--had received more information from the school nurse and the teacher than older groups. Physicians have a central role as information sources. They should be aware of other information sources in the community and should adapt their own work accordingly.

Contraceptive health risks--women's perceptions

The aim was to study women's concerns about health risks associated with contraceptives, in particular oral contraceptives and intrauterine devices (IUDs), and to investigate what factors are related to these concerns. A questionnaire was sent to a random sample of 3000 women aged 18-44 years in Finland in 1994. After two reminders, the response rate was 74% (n = 2189). Logistical models were used to examine factors that were related to concerns over oral contraceptives and IUDs. Half (n = 1096) of the respondents had at some time been concerned about the risks of contraceptives. Most concerns (71%) were related to oral contraceptives. Cardiovascular effects, cancer, infertility, mood changes and weight gain were the most commonly specified risks related to oral contraceptives, and infections, effects on menstruation and ectopic pregnancy were most mentioned regarding IUDs. Concerns about oral contraceptives were related to higher education [odds ratio (OR) 1.75; 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.38-2.21], past experience with the method (OR 1.81; 95% CI 1.45-2.26) and to a good knowledge about contraception and fertility (OR 1.68; 95% CI 1.29-2.19). Concern over IUD risks were most strongly related to past use of the method (OR 3.11; 95% CI 2.24-4.32) and higher age (35-44 years old, OR 2.99; 95% CI 1.52-5.87). Unlike women concerned about the risks of oral contraceptives, women with concerns about IUDs had had abortions more often than other women (OR 1.79; 95% CI 1.28-2.48). Women with concerns about oral contraceptives or IUDs used condoms or sterilization as their current contraceptive method significantly more often than other women. Results showed that concern about the risks of contraceptives is strongly related to women's past contraceptive experiences and influences their current use of contraceptives. More attention should be paid to information provided by health care professionals, especially that regarding risk probabilities.

A scenario study of oral contraceptive use in Japan. Toward fewer unintended pregnancies

A scenario study was conducted to assess the extent to which the unintended pregnancy rate in Japan, where oral contraceptives (OC) have not been legalized for family planning purposes and couples rely mainly on condoms, might change if more women were to use OC. Because current rates of unintended pregnancy and abortion in Japan are not known, data provided by the 1994 Japanese National Survey on Family Planning were used to construct scenarios for national contraceptive use. Annual failure rates of contraceptive methods and nonuse were applied to the contraceptive use scenarios, to obtain estimates of the annual number of contraceptive failure-related pregnancies. Subsequently, contraceptive practice situations assuming higher OC use rates were defined, and the associated change in the number of contraceptive failure-related pregnancies was estimated for each situation. It emerged that OC use rates of 15% decreased the expected number of unintended pregnancies by 13%-17%, whereas use rates of 25% resulted in decreases of 22%-29% and use rates of 50% in decreases of 45%-58%. The findings were reasonably robust to variation in the assumptions that were made. In conclusion, each theoretical percentage increase in the OC use rate in Japan was found to lead to a roughly equivalent percentage decrease in the number of unintended pregnancies.

A longitudinal study of birth control and pregnancy outcome among women in a Swedish population

The prevalence of contraception and pregnancy outcome in the same women, at 19, 24, and 29 years of age, was assessed in a longitudinal cohort study using a postal questionnaire technique. A one-in-four random sample of all women born in 1962 and resident in the city of Göteborg in 1981, was obtained from the population register (n = 656). Respondents from 1981 were re-assessed in 1986 and 1991. Four hundred thirty women (66%) answered the questionnaire on all three occasions and are included in the analysis. Contraceptive usage was as follows (at 19, 24, and 29 years of age, respectively): oral contraception (OC) 47%/51%/22%; intrauterine device 3%/11%/19%; barrier methods 12%/12%/20%; depot gestagen 0/0.2%/0.4%; no contraception 39%/26%/25%. OCs had been taken at some time by 93%. Reasons give for cessation of OC were: contraception not required 10%/21%/20%; fear of OC 28%/32%/35%; menstrual disorder 17%/13%/14%; weight increase 20%/16%/15%; mental side effects 14%/ 21%/20%; desire to become pregnant 7%/33%/52%. Pregnancy outcome was as follows: Ever pregnant 17%/42%/ 71%; children 5% had 1-2 children/27% had 1-3 children/ 59% had 1-5 children; 12%/25%/30% > or = 1 legal abortion; 3%/8%/15% > or = 1 miscarriage; and > or = 1 ectopic pregnancy 0.2%/1.2%/2.1%. On all three survey occasions, more than 97% of the legal abortions were performed < or = 12 weeks gestation. The complication rate following legal abortion was 7%. The proportion of live births to the total number of pregnancies was 25%, 45%, and 61%. The relationship between method of contraception, history of pregnancy, legal abortion, and smoking habits was analyzed in detail. Despite the availability of effective contraception, the ratio of legal abortions to live births was high. Fear of side effects was the commonest reason for discontinuing OC.

A comparison of contraceptive habits and pregnancy outcome at 19 years of age in two cohorts of Swedish women born 1962 and 1972

The prevalence of contraception and pregnancy outcome in two representative samples of 19-year-old women resident in the city of Göteborg, born in 1962 (n = 596) and 1972 (n = 641), respectively, was assessed and compared using a postal questionnaire technique. The prevalence of different contraceptive techniques was as follows (62/72): Oral contraception (OC) alone 44%/35%, (p < 0.001); OC + condom 1%/12%, p < 0.001; intrauterine device 4%/1%, p < 0.001; condom only 11%/14%; depot gestagen 0%/0.3%; no contraception 40%/38%. The median duration of OC use was 15 and 14 months, respectively. Fear of OCs was the commonest reason given for cessation of OC in the 62 cohort and that contraception was no longer required in the 72 cohort. The proportion of women who gave the latter explanation for cessation of OC had increased (p < 0.001) from 10% in 1981 to 57% in 1991, indicating that young women in Sweden now tend not to continue with OCs when a relationship ends. Although the prevalence of cigarette smoking was reduced (p < 0.05 in the 72 cohort compared to the 62 cohort), there was still an over-representation of smokers in both cohorts among contraceptive users (p < 0.001) and in women who had been pregnant (p < 0.001) or undergone an abortion (p < 0.001). Pregnancies were reported by 11% of the women from the 62 cohort and by 13% from the 72 cohort. A greater proportion (p < 0.001) of pregnancies terminated in legal abortion in the 72 cohort (61%) compared to the 62 cohort (50%). The medical complication rate following legal abortion was lower (p < 0.05) in the 72 cohort compared to the 62 cohort.