Effects of kainic acid on the glutamate receptors of the crayfish muscle

Single-channel currents underlying glycinergic inhibitory postsynaptic responses in spinal neurons

Single-channel properties of glycine receptors have been characterized so far only in cultured neurons. To characterize the glycine receptor channels in situ, we applied the patch-clamp technique to spinal neurons in slice preparations. Glycine-gated, single-channel currents were recorded in outside-out patches excised from spinal neurons. In the falling phase of glycinergic inhibitory synaptic currents, single-channel currents were resolved as discrete steps. In both cases, the glycine-gated channels showed similar multiple conductance levels. These results suggest that the receptor channel properties are indistinguishable in the synaptic and extrasynaptic sites. We conclude that multiple conductance states of a receptor channel are the native feature of the glycine receptor in situ.

Fast and slow depolarizing potentials induced by short pulses of kainic acid in hippocampal neurons

Responses of hippocampal neurons to short pulses of alpha-kainic acid (KA) were studied intracellularly in thin brain slices of the guinea pig. A KA pulse induced a slow depolarizing potential either with or without a preceding much faster depolarization. Large fast responses were induced only at the center of glutamate-sensitive spots, where short pulses of L-glutamate (Glu) induced large depolarizations in the impaled neuron. The fast responses resembled Glu-induced depolarizations in time-course, in sensitivity to movement of the tips of amino acid-pipettes, in sensitivity to Glu-antagonists and in reversal potential. The slow response was much more resistant to movement of the amino acid-pipettes and to Glu-antagonists. Mn2+ was without effect on the fast as well as the slow responses. Glu-induced depolarizations super-imposed on the slow response were simply depressed. These results indicate that two different types of receptors are activated by administration of KA, and suggest that the slow response results from a direct action of KA and the fast response is produced as a consequence of either the direct action of KA on the Glu receptors or a calcium-independent release of Glu by KA.

Effects of kainic acid in rat brain synaptosomes: the involvement of calcium

The effects of kainic acid were investigated in preparations of rat brain synaptosomes. It was found that kainic acid inhibited competitively the uptake of D-[3H]aspartate, with a Ki of approximately 0.3 mM. Kainic acid also caused release of two excitatory amino acid neurotransmitters, aspartate and glutamate, in a time- and concentration-dependent manner, but had no effect on the content of gamma-aminobutyric acid. Concomitant with the release of aspartate and glutamate, depolarization of the synaptosomal membrane and an increase in intracellular calcium were observed, with no measurable change in the concentration of internal sodium ions. The increase in intrasynaptosomal calcium and decrease in transmembrane electrical potential were prevented by the addition of glutamate, whereas the kainate-induced release of radioactive aspartate was substantially inhibited by lowering the concentration of calcium in the external medium. It is postulated that kainic acid reacts with a class of glutamate receptors located in a subpopulation of synaptosomes, presumably derived from the glutamatergic and aspartatergic neuronal pathways, which possesses high-affinity uptake system(s) for glutamate and/or aspartate. Activation of these receptors causes opening of calcium channels, influx of calcium into the synaptosomes, and depolarization of the synaptosomal plasma membrane with consequent release of amino acid neurotransmitters.

gamma-D-glutamylglycine as an antagonist of kainic acid on leech Retzius neurones

Intracellular recordings were made from Retzius cells from the segmental ganglia of the leech, Hirudo medicinalis, gamma-D-Glutamylglycine, (50 microM), reversibly and preferentially antagonised the excitatory action of kainate, having no effect on actions of quisqualate or carbachol but at this concentration the antagonism was of short duration, reversing prior to washing off the gamma-D-glutamylglycine. However, higher concentrations of gamma-D-glutamylglycine (250-500 microM) reversibly antagonised both quisqualate and carbachol-induced excitatory responses, indicating a lack of specificity. The value of gamma-D-glutamylglycine in determining the possible site of action of kainate on leech Retzius cells is discussed.

Glutamate-induced cellular injury in isolated chick embryo retina: Müller cell localization of initial effects

The neurotoxic and gliotoxic effects of glutamate and several glutamate analogues were studied in isolated chick embryo retinas. To facilitate examination of initial pathological events, a short-term incubation system was developed and used for light microscopic and autoradiographic investigation. Low-dose, short-term glutamate treatment of 12-day retinas resulted in a glial-specific lesion in the Müller cells, characterized by extensive cellular edema; at higher concentrations and/or longer treatment times, neurotoxic as well as gliotoxic effects were seen. The early glial damage was identical in appearance to that seen after incubation with DL-alpha-aminoadipate and other reported gliotoxins. No evidence of a similar glial-specific action was seen after administration of kainic acid, although extensive neuronal degeneration did result. Incubation of retinas with tritiated glutamate (3H-glu) revealed a selective uptake of the label by Müller cells. Autoradiographic grains were localized over Müller foot processes at the inner limiting membrane, and by 30 minutes labeled the entire glial system. Prior treatment with neurotoxic levels of glutamate did not alter the autoradiographic localization to glial cells. Possible glial-neuronal interactions and their effect on cytotoxic patterns are discussed.

Glutamate inhibitors in the crayfish neuromuscular junction

1. The effects of chlorisondamine and TI-233 on the crayfish neuromuscular junction were investigated in order to compare the action of glutamate with that of the excitatory transmitter. 2. The glutamate-induced synaptic current was inhibited by both of these two drugs. Excitatory junctional potentials were significantly reduced by chlorisondamine, whereas they were increased by TI-233. 3. It is suggested that chlorisondamine and TI-233 are powerful non-competitive antagonists for glutamate. 4. A quantum analysis of extracellular EJPs demonstrated that chlorisondamine did not possess presynaptic action in the crayfish neuromuscular junction. Chlorisondamine shortened the decay phase of extracellular EJPs, and the decay was frequently fitted by a double exponential in relatively low concentrations. 5. Semilogarithmic plots of the decay phase of the glutamate current evoked by a short glutamate pulse were nearly linear, but they shifted from linearity to some extent in the presence of chlorisondamine, showing prolongation of the glutamate current tails. 6. When TI-233 was added to the bathing solution at a concentration of 0.1 mM, the quantum content of extracellular EJPs was increased by about two times, but the average unit size was not changed. 7. There was no change in the rise time and the decay phase of the glutamate potential in the presence of TI-233. 8. Pharmacological difference between glutamate responses and EJPs was revealed in the presence of chlorisondamine and TI-233. Unless this difference can be explicated with a reasonable explanation on the glutamate transmitter hypothesis, it is difficult to confirm that glutamic acid is an excitatory transmitter at the crayfish neuromuscular junction.

The role of calcium ion in the L-glutamate-induced depolarization in the frog spinal cord

1. The role of Ca2+ in L-glutamate-induced depolarization was investigated in the isolated frog spinal cord. 2. The size of a depolarization induced by L-glutamate (3 mM) was inversely related to the extracellular Ca2+ concentration, but was reduced in a Ca2+-free medium containing EGTA (0.3 mM). 3. L-Glutamate caused a marked depolarization in both ventral and dorsal roots, even in a NaCl-deficient medium (Ca2+, 2.0 mM). The size of the depolarization was attenuated by a prolonged or repeated application of L-glutamate. Ca2+ can be replaced by Sr2+ or Mg2+. 4. Concanavalin A (1 microM) prevents the development of desensitization to L-glutamate. 5. Present results suggest that Ca2+ plays the role of a charge carrier for L-glutamate-induced depolarization and of a regulator of modulator for L-glutamate-receptor sensitivity. The roles are exaggerated in NaCl-free medium.

Distribution and pharmacological properties of synaptic and extrasynaptic glutamate receptors on crayfish muscle

1. The distribution of glutamate sensitivity was measured in the opener muscle in the walking legs of the crayfish (Cambarus clarkii). L-Glutamate was ionophoretically applied under visual control. 2. Bundles of a few muscle fibres were isolated and viewed with Nomarski optics. Two axons, presumably excitatory and inhibitory, branched widely over the surface of individual muscle fibres, forming numerous clusters of boutons or varicosities. 3. Glutamate sensitivity was measured from the slope of the dose-response curves obtained by ionophoretic application of L-glutamate and expressed as mV/nC. The highest sensitivities were about 100 mV/nC, obtained at the edge of synaptic boutons. The sensitivity declined to less than 5% about 2 micrometer away from the synaptic terminal. The time course of glutamate potentials was approximately the same as that of spontaneous synaptic potentials. 4. Glutamate depolarization started within 300 microsec after ionophoretic release of glutamate. This time lag was shorter than the synaptic delay of the nerve-evoked synaptic potential measured with an extracellular micro-electrode. This indicates that glutamate depolarization results from a direct action on the post-synaptic receptor. 5. Application of L-alpha-kainic acid decreased the amplitude of the glutamate potential produced at the synaptic region, whereas kainate increased the amplitude of the glutamate potential at the extrasynaptic region. It is suggested that the pharmacological properties of the extrasynaptic receptor differ from those of the synaptic receptor. Possible mechanisms for the different actions of kainate are discussed.

Characterization of specific, high-affinity binding sites for L-[3H]glutamic acid in rat brain membranes

L-[3H]Glutamic acid binds reversibly to rat brain membranes with high affinity. Specific binding is linear with tissue concentration and has a pH optimum at neutrality. Saturation isotherms reveal anomolous kinetics of specific binding with an high affinity site with a KD of 11 nM and a lower affinity site with a KD of 80 nM; the Scatchard plots intercept at a common bound/free ratio. Hill plots of the complete saturation isotherms have a slope of 1.0. There are marked regional differences in the distribution of binding sites in rat brain: parietal cortex, frontal cortex, hippocampus greater than striatum greater than thalamus greater than cerebellum, pons-medulla and hypothalamus. Except for a small amount of specific binding in heart, other peripheral tissues do not exhibit specific binding of L-[3H]glutamic acid. Several amino acids with neuroexcitatory effects inhibit the specific binding: L-glutamic acid greater than L-aspartic acid and D,L-homocysteic acid greater than D-glutamic acid and L-cysteine sulfinic acid; related amino acids without neuroexcitatory effects do not inhibit specific binding. Reputed antagonists of glutamate-induced neuronal depolarization block specific binding: alpha-aminoadipic acid greater than 2-amino,4-phosphonobutyric acid greater than glutamate diethylester. Prior kainate lesion of the neurons intrinsic to the striatum results in a 45% decrement in specific binding of L-[3H]glutamic acid whereas cortical ablation, which causes degeneration of a cortical-striatal glutamatergic projection and reduces striatal glutamate synaptosomal uptake, does not affect specific binding. These results are compatible with the interpretation that the binding of [3H]glutamic acid occurs at excitatory receptors on neurons.

Differential effects of diltiazem on glutamate potentials and excitatory junctional potentials at the crayfish neuromuscular junction

1. The effects of diltiazem on glutamate potentials and excitatory junctional potentials (e.j.p.s) were investigated in the crayfish neuromuscular junction. 2. When diltiazem (0.3 mM) was added to the perfusion fluid, the ionophoretic glutamate potential was reduced to about half, whereas the peak amplitude of successive e.j.p.s elicited by a train of pulses of 100/sec increased by about 2 times. 3. It was suggested that diltiazem was a non-competitive inhibitor of L-glutamate. The reduction of the response to applied glutamate was not due to the acceleration of desensitization of the glutamate receptor. The rate of recovery from desensitization was delayzed by diltiazem. 4. The increase in amplitude of e.j.p.s caused by diltiazem was due to the increase in membrane resistance. The quantum content and size of extracellular e.j.p.s were not affected by diltiazem. 5. It was substantiated using the micro-electrode technique that the glutamate sensitive area coincided with the neuromuscular junctional area. 6. The pharmacological difference between glutamate potentials and e.j.p.s revealed in the present study is difficult to explain on the glutamate transmitter hypothesis. One explanation worthy to be considered is that there are two pharmacologically different kinds of receptors sensitive to L-glutamate.

Pharmacological distinction between the excitatory junctional potential and the glutamate potential revealed by concanavalin A at the crayfish neuromuscular junction

The effect of concanavalin A(Con A) on desensitization of the glutamate receptor was investigated in the crayfish opener muscle. The depolarization of the crayfish muscle fiber caused by bath-applied L-glutamate was greatly augmented by Con A. The time course of the appearance of the augmentation was slow. Con A completely prevented the development of desensitization of the glutamate receptor. When L-glutamate was applied iontophoretically with a constant current pulse, a decline of the depolarization was seen during the course of the drug application which was presumably due to desensitization of the glutamate receptor. The glutamate potential was slightly increased by Con A, though the increase was transient. On the other hand, the amplitude of excitatory junctional potentials (EJPs) was not increased but decreased by addition of Con A. In normal saline, the amplitudes of both glutamate potentials and EJPs remarkably decreased because of desensitization of the glutamate receptor, but the decrease in amplitude of the glutamate potential was completely prevented by previous application of Con A. On the other hand, Con A had no influence upon the decrease in amplitude of EJPs. These results show that there is a pharmacological difference between the glutamate potential and EJPs.

Further observations on the interaction between glutamate and aspartate on lobster muscle

1 The ability of bath-applied L-glutamate to enhance subsequent depolarizations produced by bath-applied L-aspartate on lobster muscle was further investigated by means of intracellular recording techniques. 2. Increasing the conditioning glutamate concentration or exposure time produced a greater enhancement of aspartate responses. Enhancement was also dependent on the time interval between glutamate and aspartate doses and was not prevented by overnight storage of preparations in vitro. 3. The dose-depolarization curve for enhanced aspartate responses (measured at a fixed time following a given dose of glutamate) was displaced to the left along the abscissa scale relative to control, with no detectable change in limiting log-log slope. 4. Conditioning doses of kainate or domoate (but not quisqualate, aspartate, or KCl) also enhanced aspartate responses; however, their conditioning effect was little affected by increasing the concentration, exposure time, or time interval before applying aspartate. The rate of onset and decline of the enhanced aspartate response always resembled that of the previous conditioning agonist. 5. D and L-Aspartate were approximately equieffective depolarizing agents whereas D-glutamate was approximately 1/40 as potent as L-glutamate. After a conditioning dose of D or L-glutamate, responses to D or L-aspartate were enhanced. 6. In a Na+-free (Li+) medium, both the glutamate depolarization and the conditioning effect towards aspartate were largely abolished. With kainate however, Na+ was not apparently important either for evoking the kainate response or for producing the conditioning effect. 7. Bath-applied glutamate greatly enhanced and prolonged the time course of the iontophoretic aspartate potential with only a small effect on the glutamate potential; however, these effects were not maintained after washout of glutamate. In contrast, bath-application of aspartate depressed the aspartate potential while enhancing the glutamate potential. Some sites that were insensitive to iontophoretically-applied aspartate became clearly responsive to this agent during a bath-application of glutamate. 8. It is proposed that during conditioning with bath-applied glutamate, kainate or domoate, some agonist is trapped by extrajunctional sites and is subsequently displaced by bath-applied aspartate to produce the long-term enhancement effect.

A study of the interactions between glutamate and aspartate at the lobster neuromuscular junction

The depolarization produced by bath-applied or iontophoretically applied glutamate and aspartate were recorded from lobster muscle fibres by means of intracellular microelectrodes. 2 Bath-applied glutamate or aspartate evoked reversible, membrane depolarizations; however, responses to repeated applications of aspartate decreased progressively in amplitude until a plateau level was attained. Repeated applications of glutamate, kainate, domoate or quisqualate did not produce a similar effect. 3 After a dose of glutamate, responses to bath-applied aspartate were enhanced. Responses to other depolarizing agonists were little affected by previous administration of glutamate. Aspartate dose-depolarization curves were therefore constructed after initial aspartate responses had stabilized. The log-log transforms of the aspartate and glutamate curves had limiting slopes of 0.8 and 2.1 respectively. 4 Iontophoretic application of aspartate to single glutamate-sensitive sites produced small depolarizations with slow time course, compared with the glutamate potentials. When aspartate and glutamate were pulsed simultaneously from a twin-barrelled pipette, the resultant glutamate potential was enhanced. It is suggested that this potentiation was due to summation of agonist concentrations in the receptor region interacting with a second-order dose-response relationship. 5 Bath-applied aspartate increased the amplitude and prolonged the half-decay time of the glutamate potential. This effect was particularly noticeable when the glutamate potential was of slow time course. 6 It is proposed that bath-applied aspartate has an agonist effect whose magnitude is possibly exaggerated by concomitant release of glutamate and/or inhibition by glutamate of aspartate uptake. This agonist action of aspartate is thought to be exerted mainly on extrajunctional areas of the glutamate-sensitive sites.

A comparative study of the effects of glutamate and kainate on the lobster muscle fibre and the frog spinal cord

1 The depolarizing actions of glutamate and its conformationally restricted analogue kainate were investigated on the lobster muscle fibre and the frog spinal cord using intracellular and extracellular recordings, respectively. 2 Bath-applied kainate was less potent than glutamate on the lobster fibre but more potent on the frog cord. From the log-log transformation of dose-response curves it was proposed that more than one glutamate molecule was necessary to activate both the lobster and the frog receptor sites. In the frog, at least three kainate molecules were thought to be required for receptor activation. 3 The ionic dependence of glutamate and kainate responses appeared different for the two tissues. 4 Some possible explanations of the differential tissue sensitivity to kainate are discussed.