Avian retrovirus integration protein: structure-functional analysis of viable mutants

Molecular and genetic determinants of rous sarcoma virus integrase for concerted DNA integration

Site-directed mutagenesis of recombinant Rous sarcoma virus (RSV) integrase (IN) allowed us to gain insights into the protein-protein and protein-DNA interactions involved in reconstituted IN-viral DNA complexes capable of efficient concerted DNA integration (termed full-site). At 4 nM IN, wild-type (wt) RSV IN incorporates approximately 30% of the input donor into full-site integration products after 10 min of incubation at 37 degrees C, which is equivalent to isolated retrovirus preintegration complexes for full-site integration activity. DNase I protection analysis demonstrated that wt IN was able to protect the viral DNA ends, mapping approximately 20 bp from the end. We had previously mapped the replication capabilities of several RSV IN mutants (A48P and P115S) which appeared to affect viral DNA integration in vivo. Surprisingly, recombinant RSV A48P IN retained wt IN properties even though the virus carrying this mutation had significantly reduced integrated viral DNA in comparison to wt viral DNA in virus-infected cells. Recombinant RSV P115S IN also displayed all of the properties of wt RSV IN. Upon heating of dimeric P115S IN in solution at 57 degrees C, it became apparent that the mutation in the catalytic core of RSV IN exhibited the same thermolabile properties for 3' OH processing and strand transfer (half-site and full-site integration) activities consistent with the observed temperature-sensitive defect for integration in vivo. The average half-life for inactivation of the three activities were similar, ranging from 1.6 to 1.9 min independent of the IN concentrations in the assay mixtures. Wt IN was stable under the same heat treatment. DNase I protection analysis of several conservative and nonconservative substitutions at W233 (a highly conserved residue of the retrovirus C-terminal domain) suggests that this region is involved in protein-DNA interactions at the viral DNA attachment site. Our data suggest that the use of recombinant RSV IN to investigate efficient full-site integration in vitro with reference to integration in vivo is promising.

Characterization of a stable eukaryotic cell line expressing the Rous sarcoma virus integrase

The Rous sarcoma virus integration protein (IN) is required for efficient integration of viral DNA into the host genome. IN was expressed in mouse C127 cells using a bovine papillomavirus vector. This system utilizes the mouse metallothionein promoter and the SV40 late polyadenylation signal for efficient expression of IN. A stable cell line derived from a single hygromycin-resistant colony was characterized. The expression of IN increased significantly upon Zn2+ induction of the metallothionein promoter, but did not respond to "superinduction" protocols. Full-length nonphosphorylated IN was the major product of expression. A minor product resulting from initiation of translation at an internal Met codon was also produced. The expressed IN did not exhibit the polypeptide heterogeneity at its COOH-terminus nor phosphorylation as is seen when IN is immunoprecipitated from virions. Using subcellular fractionation and indirect immunofluorescence, IN was primarily localized to nuclei and in some cells appeared to concentrate at discrete loci within the nuclei.

Rearrangements in unintegrated retroviral DNA are complex and are the result of multiple genetic determinants

We used a replication-competent retrovirus shuttle vector based on a DNA clone of the Schmidt-Ruppin A strain of Rous sarcoma virus to characterize rearrangements in circular viral DNA. In this system, circular molecules of viral DNA present after acute infection of cultured cells were cloned as plasmids directly into bacteria. The use of a replication-competent shuttle vector permitted convenient isolation of a large number of viral DNA clones; in this study, over 1,000 clones were analyzed. The circular DNA molecules could be placed into a limited number of categories. Approximately one-third of the rescued molecules had deletions in which one boundary was very near the edge of a long terminal repeat (LTR) unit. Subtle differences in the patterns of deletions in circular DNAs with one versus two copies of the LTR sequence were observed, and differences between deletions emanating from the right and left boundaries of the LTR were seen. A virus with a missense mutation in the region of the pol gene responsible for integration and exhibiting a temperature sensitivity phenotype for replication had a marked decrease in the number of rescued molecules with LTR-associated deletions when infection was performed at the nonpermissive temperature. This result suggests that determinants in the pol gene, possibly in the integration protein, play a role in the generation of LTR-associated deletions. Sequences in a second region of the genome, probably within the viral gag gene, were also found to affect the types of circular viral DNA molecules present after infection. Sequences in this region from different strains of avian sarcoma-leukosis viruses influenced the fraction of circular molecules with LTR-associated deletions, as well as the relative proportion of circular molecules with either one or two copies of the LTR. Thus, the profile of rearrangements in unintegrated viral DNA is complex and dependent upon the nature of sequences in the gag and pol regions.

Functional similarities between retroviruses and the IS3 family of bacterial insertion sequences?

Members of the IS3 family of insertion sequences are found in a wide range of bacteria. At least 10 members of this family carry two major open reading frames: a small upstream frame (0 phase), and a longer downstream frame in the -1 phase. The downstream frame shows significant similarity at the amino acid level. A highly conserved region of this frame also exhibits notable similarity with a region of the integrase (endonuclease) domain of retroviruses. Although the overall transposition mechanism of the insertion sequence and retroviral elements is certainly different, the two groups may share additional common features, including a -1 frameshift resulting in the production of a fusion protein.