Sequential anti-idiotypes define reciprocal idiotopes on the same anti-DNA antibody

Chimaeric monoclonal antibodies encoded by the human VH26 gene from naïve transgenic mice display a wide range of antigen-binding specificities

To elucidate the molecular basis for the ability of antibodies encoded by the human VH26 heavy-chain variable region gene to react with diverse antigens, we have generated 34 hybridomas secreting chimaeric monoclonal antibodies (human mu heavy chain/mouse light chains) from transgenic mice. The transgenic mice carry an immunoglobulin minilocus containing the human VH26 gene, human DH and JH gene segments, and genes encoding the human C mu region. The minilocus in these animals undergoes functional rearrangement resulting in the production of chimaeric antibodies in which human mu heavy chains utilizing the VH26 gene are paired with mouse kappa or lambda light chains. The hybridomas described in this study were generated from naïve animals and were selected solely on the basis of human mu-chain expression. The antibodies described have covalently attached mouse light chains and are multimeric in structure. The binding properties of the antibodies were examined using a panel of both self- and foreign antigens using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assays, agglutination or radio-immunoprecipitation assays and immunofluorescence. Chimaeric immunoglobulins from 21 of the 34 hybridoma clones (61.7%) reacted with one or more antigens, of which 13 (38.2%) reacted with more than two antigens. These studies demonstrate that the VH26 gene, in combination with human DH and JH gene segments, and mouse light-chain genes, is able to encode antibodies with a wide range of ligand-binding specificities. These findings have important implications in the context of the possible origins of autoantibodies encoded by VH26 which may play a role in the pathogenesis of a number of autoimmune conditions.

Expression of public idiotypes in patients with Lyme arthritis

OBJECTIVE

Joints are often affected in Lyme disease and in some instances this may be due to immune autoreactivity. To characterise further the immune response in this disease investigations were carried out to determine the expression of three public idiotypes on serum immunoglobulins in patients with Lyme disease during the development of varying degrees of arthritis.

METHODS

The expression of idiotypes (Ids) 16/6, BEG2, and PR4, first identified on monoclonal antibodies to DNA, was determined by an enzyme linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) in serial blood samples from 12 patients with Lyme disease over a mean period of six years during the development of a variety of arthritic symptoms, and in serum samples from healthy control subjects and control subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus.

RESULTS

Expression of serum IgM or IgG public Ids 16/6 and BEG2 was significantly increased in patients with Lyme disease. IgA Id 16/6 expression, in contrast, was significantly increased only during episodes of arthritis and was also related to its severity. IgM and IgG Id 16/6 expression was related to their respective total immunoglobulin concentration and, in the case of IgM, to the level of IgM antibodies to Borrelia burgdorferi, whereas similar findings were not apparent with IgA antibodies. This may indicate that the IgA response is related to the pathogenesis of arthritis, especially as total IgA and IgA Id 16/6 levels were found to increase over the duration of disease. Sequential analysis of antibodies also showed restriction in the expression of Id 16/6 as it was never found on all immunoglobulin isotypes at the same time, and Id PR4 was never expressed. Ids 16/6 and BEG2 expression, however, may be associated as seven patients expressed these idiotypes simultaneously.

CONCLUSIONS

These data indicate the use of public idiotypes in the immune response against B burgdorferi, which may be restricted in terms of idiotype class and isotype expression, and a possible association between IgA antibodies bearing Id 16/6 with arthritis.

Comparative study of idiotypes on monoclonal antibodies derived from patients with lupus and leprosy and from normal individuals

A collaborative study was performed to compare the expression of a series of idiotypes defined on human anti-DNA and other autoantibodies. Three panels of human monoclonal antibodies were tested: eight derived from patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE); 13 from an individual with lepromatous leprosy; and 38 from normal subjects. The following rabbit anti-idiotype sera were used: one (RId16/6) raised against the lupus-derived monoclonal anti-DNA antibody 16/6, four (RId8E7, RId4G7, RId4D5 and RIdTH9) against leprosy-derived monoclonal antibodies of various specificities, and one (anti-4.6.3) against a normal-derived anti-DNA monoclonal (KIM 4.6). In addition, two other anti-idiotypes were used--one a murine monoclonal (3I), the other a rabbit polyclonal (RIdD)--which had been raised against polyclonal anti-DNA antibodies from lupus serum. Further experiments were performed with immunoabsorbed fractions of RId8E7. Direct-binding and competition assays were used. All of the anti-idiotypes produced different patterns of positivity among the three panels of human monoclonal antibodies, with the exception of RId8E7 and RId4G7, which showed considerable concordance. There was a tendency towards anti-idiotypes being disease- or group-specific: thus anti-4.6.3 failed to bind to any of the lupus or leprosy-derived monoclonals, while RId16/6 and RId8E7 bound most strongly to the lupus- and leprosy-derived antibodies respectively. KIM 4.6 itself was bound only weakly by RId16/6, while 16/6 was not recognized by anti-4.6.3; 16/6 was, however, bound by 3I, while KIM 4.6 was not. 3I bound to several other monoclonals but RIdD, which has been shown to be specific for the anti-DNA fraction of lupus serum, did not bind to any of them. These results indicate that the majority of these anti-idiotype preparations recognize largely separate sets of determinants. The monoclonal antibodies which bind to DNA may be only partly representative of anti-DNA antibodies in the serum of lupus patients.

Idiotypes and autoimmunity

The reports discussed above have increased our knowledge of idiotypes, mainly with respect to additional CRI on autoantibodies and to a relatively new aspect of 'pathogenic idiotypes'. It is obvious that much remains to be discovered about the normal role of idiotypes and how they might be involved in the pathogenesis of autoimmune disorders. The relationship of the idiotypic network to tolerance is a matter of speculation; tolerance implies the ability to distinguish between 'foreign' and self-antigens and it is important to remember that antibody V regions are also self-antigens. Several mechanisms have been proposed to explain immunological tolerance. Originally, it was envisaged that the repertoires of both T and B lymphocytes were in some way purged of potentially self-reactive clones. However, it is now evident that self-reactive lymphocytes do exist but are normally held under control. Finally, it may be that certain self-antigens are simply never exposed to immune surveillance. It seems that the control of self-reactive lymphocytes is central to the question of tolerance. In the absence of autoimmune disease, autoantibodies can be produced, for example, after many infectious diseases or vaccinations. However, this type of perturbation of the immune system is associated with the short-term production of low titres of low-affinity antibodies, generally of the IgM isotype, which are thought to represent germline gene products. Homeostasis is soon re-established, possibly by regulatory T cells interacting with autoreactive B cells through their idiotypic receptors.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)