Hexamethylmelamine in ovarian cancer after failure of cisplatin-based multiple-agent chemotherapy

Resource utilization for ovarian cancer patients at the end of life: How much is too much?

OBJECTIVE

End-of-life (EOL) medical care consumes 10-12% of national health care expenditures and 27% of Medicare dollars annually. Studies suggest that hospice services decrease EOL expenditures by 25-40%. The goal of this study was to compare the total cost of hospital-based resources utilized in ovarian cancer patients during their last 60 days of life for those enrolled in hospice versus those not on hospice.

METHODS

Study eligibility included patients who expired from ovarian cancer from 1999 to 2003. Medical records were reviewed for demographic data as well as treatment, response and recurrence rates, histologic type, grade and stage. Billing records were analyzed for costs of inpatient and outpatients visits, including radiologic, laboratory and pharmacy charges. Total cost of hospital resources was compared between patients managed on hospice for >10 days (hospice group) versus <10 days (non-hospice group) using the following methods: Mann-Whitney U, Kruskal-Wallis and Student's t tests. Overall survival was compared using Kaplan-Meier statistics.

RESULTS

Of the 84 patients analyzed, 67 (79.8%) were in the non-hospice group and 17 (20.2%) were in the hospice group. Demographic, histologic and staging characteristics as well as platinum sensitivity were similar between the two groups before the last 60 days of life. Mean number of chemotherapy cycles before the study period was also similar (20.4 and 21.0, respectively). However, during the study period, the mean total cost per patient in the non-hospice group was dollar 59,319 versus dollar 15,164 in the hospice group (P = 0.0001). A significant difference in cost was noted for mean inpatient days (dollar 6584 vs. dollar 1629, P = 0.0007), radiology (dollar 6063 vs. dollar 2343, P = 0.003), laboratory (dollar 12,281 vs. dollar 2026, P = 0.0004) and pharmacy charges (dollar 13,650 vs. dollar 4465, P = 0.0017) as well as for treating physician per patient (dollar 112,707 vs. dollar 34,677, P = 0.04). Overall survival for the two groups was the same.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings demonstrate that there is a significant cost difference with no appreciable improvement in survival between ovarian cancer patients treated aggressively versus those enrolled in hospice at the EOL. These data suggest that earlier hospice enrollment is beneficial. Furthermore, cost variations between physicians and patients imply that education may be an important variable.

Long term follow-up of patients with recurrent ovarian cancer after Ad p53 gene replacement with SCH 58500

OBJECTIVE

We have previously reported the safety, efficient gene transfer, and favorable CA125 responses of individuals with recurrent ovarian cancer treated by p53 gene replacement with the adenoviral vector SCH 58500. The purpose of the present investigation was to evaluate the long-term follow-up of these heavily pretreated patients subsequent to SCH 58500 dosing.

METHODS

Patients (n=36) were treated with either single-dose SCH 58500 in the phase I study or with multiple doses (MD) of SCH 58500 over multiple cycles in combination of platinum-based chemotherapy in the phase I/II portion of the study. Five patients were initially treated in the single-dose group and re-enrolled in the MD group. The MD group was evaluated both without the re-enrolled patients as MD1 (n=19), and as MD2 (n=24), which included them. Patients who were only treated on the single-dose arm were designated as SD (n=12). Most patients received additional chemotherapy at the discretion of their physicians on completion of the trial. The current analysis is a retrospective sequential cohort survival analysis.

RESULTS

The first patient was treated in March 1997 and the last patient completed SCH 58500 in September 1998. There was no difference in age at diagnosis, Karnofsky performance status, interval between diagnosis to SCH 58500, prior cycles or regimen of chemotherapy, platinum-free interval, percent platinum refractory patients, pretreatment CA125, or largest tumor volume between groups. Both MD groups had a slightly longer chemotherapy-free interval before SCH 58500 than the SD group. Median survival of individuals who received MD SCH 58500 with chemotherapy was 12-13.0 months, compared to only 5 months for those treated with SD SCH 58500. There are 10 long-term survivors more than 20 months after MD treatment for recurrent disease compared to only 2 long-term survivors after SD SCH 58500.

CONCLUSION

The 12- to 13.0-month median survival in a heavily pretreated population with recurrent ovarian cancer compares favorably to the 16-month median survival for individuals treated with paclitaxel at the time of initial recurrence of this disease and is more than double the 5-month survival seen with palliative radiotherapy or paclitaxel failure. These data suggest that further study of SCH58500 is clearly indicated.

Does palliative chemotherapy palliate? Evaluation of expectations, outcomes, and costs in women receiving chemotherapy for advanced ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

The value of palliative chemotherapy in women with refractory and recurrent ovarian cancer is difficult to quantify, and little is known about patient expectations from these treatments. We evaluated in the current prospective study patient expectations, palliative outcomes of chemotherapy, and the inherent resource utilization in patients undergoing second- or third-line chemotherapy for recurrent or refractory advanced ovarian cancer.

METHODS

The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality-of-Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ C30) and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Ovarian (FACT-O) questionnaires were used to assess palliative benefit and an in-house questionnaire was used to gauge patient expectations. The minimal clinically important difference (MCID) was calculated by asking women to make a global rating of change and correlating this to the EORTC QLQ C30. Resource use was recorded and costs were calculated.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients were accrued. Objective response was documented on seven of 27. The median survival was 11 months. Sixty-five percent of women expected that chemotherapy would make them live longer and 42% that it would cure them. After two cycles, quality-of-life (QL) improvement was seen particularly in global function (11 of 21) and emotional function (13 of 21) with EORTC QLQ C-30. Improvement was sustained for a median of 2 and 3 months, respectively, in these categories. The MCID was calculated to be 0.39 on a seven-point scale for physical function and 0.13 for global function. The mean total cost per patient for the study period was Can $12,500.

CONCLUSION

Patient expectations from these treatments are often unrealistic. Although objective responses are low, active palliation with chemotherapy is associated with substantive improvement in patients' emotional function and global QL, with overall costs that seem relatively modest.

Salvage therapy for ovarian cancer

The majority of patients with ovarian cancer will relapse after initial chemotherapy and will be candidates for salvage treatment. Currently, five agents show clear activity in patients with platinum- and paclitaxel-resistant disease: topotecan, oral etoposide, liposomal doxorubicin, gemcitabine, and, possibly, docetaxel. In addition, other agents have activity in platinum-resistant patients: vinorelbine, tamoxifen, ifosfamide, altretamine, 5-fluorouracil with leucovorin, and, possibly, irinotecan. Furthermore, selected patients may benefit from other therapeutic approaches such as surgery or radiation therapy.

Altretamine (hexamethylmelamine) in platinum-resistant and platinum-refractory ovarian cancer: a Gynecologic Oncology Group phase II trial

OBJECTIVES

In an effort to critically examine the antitumor activity of altretamine (hexamethylmelamine) as salvage therapy of platinum-refractory ovarian cancer, the Gynecologic Oncology Group initiated a Phase II trial of the agent administered in this clinical setting.

METHODS

Altretamine was administered at a dose of 260 mg/m2 orally for 14 days in a 28-day course. Treatment was continued until disease progression or unacceptable side effects prevented further therapy. A total of 36 patients (median age: 56.5) were treated on this trial, of whom 33 were evaluable for toxicity and 30 for response. All patients had previously received either cisplatin or carboplatin and paclitaxel.

RESULTS

The major side effect was emesis (grade 3-4, 7/33, 21%). The objective response rate was 10% (one complete response, two partial responses).

CONCLUSION

We conclude that altretamine has limited activity in platinum-refractory ovarian cancer.

Cost-utility analysis of paclitaxel in combination with cisplatin for patients with advanced ovarian cancer

The standard treatment for patients with advanced ovarian cancer (AOC) has been cyclophosphamide and cisplatin (CP). Recently, the results of a large randomized comparative trial demonstrated that the combination of paclitaxel and cisplatin (TP) provided a progression-free survival benefit of 5 months. In this study, a cost-utility analysis was performed from a Canadian health care system perspective to estimate the incremental cost-effectiveness of the TP combination. Twelve AOC patients who received treatment with TP were matched for age and disease stage on a 1-to-2 basis with a CP control. Total hospital resource consumption was then collected for all patients. Treatment preferences were estimated from a cohort of 20 patients and 40 healthy female volunteers using the time trade-off technique. The outcomes were then generated through a decision-analytic model. First-line treatment costs with TP were approximately fourfold greater on a per-cycle basis than the CP alternative (Can$1911 vs Can$459). When progression-free survival benefit and patient treatment preferences were incorporated into the analysis, the results of the decision model revealed an incremental cost between Can$12,000 and Can$24,000 per quality-adjusted progression-free year with the TP protocol. Even though the TP combination has a considerably higher drug acquisition cost, the results of the current analysis suggest that this new chemotherapy regimen does provide patients with substantial quality-adjusted progression-free survival benefit at a reasonable cost to the Canadian health care system.

Hexamethylmelamine as a single second-line agent in ovarian cancer: follow-up report and review of the literature

From December 1982 to December 1986, 52 patients with recurrent ovarian cancer were treated with single-agent HMM. Chemotherapy was given for a period of 1 year unless progression of disease or toxicity was noted. Survival was determined from the time of diagnosis to the date of death or September 30, 1992. The regimen was well tolerated with only one case of severe gastrointestinal toxicity. Nine patients were found to be clinically free of disease following completion of HMM treatment; they had initially responded to cisplatin-based therapy (i.e., potentially cisplatin-sensitive) and subsequently recurred. Four were found to have gross disease at the time of reassessment laparotomy. Three of these 9 patients are alive 81-92 months since diagnosis, having maintained disease-free intervals of up to 6 years. The median survival for the 9 patients without evidence of disease at the end of therapy was 75 months versus 9 months for the nonresponders. No patient who had progressive disease on first-line cisplatin-based combination chemotherapy (i.e., primary cisplatin-resistant) responded to second-line single-agent oral hexamethylmelamine. With a follow-up close to 10 years, our data show that hexamethylmelamine, with reasonable toxicity, can provide an extended, disease-free interval to a selected group of patients.

In vivo antitumor activity of hexamethylmelamine against human breast, stomach and colon carcinoma xenografts

We have evaluated the antitumor activity of Altretamine (hexamethylmelamine, HMM) on human carcinoma xenografts serially transplanted in nude mice. Five human breast carcinoma xenografts, MX-1, T-61, MCF-7, R-27 and Br-10, were inoculated subcutaneously into female nude mice. Two human stomach carcinoma xenografts, SC-1-NU and St-4, and three human colon carcinoma xenografts, Co-3, Co-4 and Co-6, were inoculated subcutaneously into male nude mice. One pellet of 17 beta-estradiol (0.1 mg/mouse) was inoculated subcutaneously in the mice transplanted with MCF-7 when the tumors were inoculated. HMM was administered per os daily for 4 weeks. MX-1 and T-61 tumors regressed completely after treatment with HMM at a dose of 75 mg/kg (the maximum tolerated dose: MTD) for MX-1 and 25 mg/kg for T-61. Br-10 was sensitive, whereas MCF-7 and R-27 were resistant to HMM at its MTD. HMM exerted the most potent antitumor effect against T-61. Against MX-1, it exerted an antitumor effect equivalent to that of cisplatin or cyclophosphamide. In addition, this agent was effective against all stomach and colon carcinoma xenografts, in particular St-4 (T/C% = 10.7: the mean tumor weight of treated group/the mean tumor weight of control group) and Co-3 (T/C% = 31.5%) which are insensitive to presently available agents. HMM seems worthy of further clinical investigation as a candidate agent to treat breast, stomach, colon and other carcinomas.

Altretamine. A review of its pharmacodynamic and pharmacokinetic properties, and therapeutic potential in cancer chemotherapy

Altretamine (hexamethylmelamine) is a cytotoxic antineoplastic agent which appears to require metabolic activation. Metabolic intermediates may act as alkylating agents; however, altretamine is not directly cross-resistant with classical alkylating agents. Objective response rates to orally administered altretamine as salvage therapy in patients with advanced ovarian cancer were 0 to 33%, with disease stabilisation in a further 8 to 78% of patients. Response rates appear to be higher in patients who have responded to previous alkylating agent or cisplatin-based therapy. There is some evidence that addition of altretamine to platinum-based combination regimens used for induction therapy of advanced ovarian cancer may improve long term survival, particularly in patients with limited residual disease. Although altretamine displays some activity in small cell lung cancer, it is unlikely to have any clinical role in the management of non-ovarian cancer. Altretamine appears to be relatively well tolerated, with gastrointestinal, neurological and haematological toxicities being the main dose-limiting adverse effects. However, assessment of accurate incidence rates for these effects is complicated by the use of altretamine with cisplatin. On the basis of the emerging body of clinical evidence, altretamine appears to have a limited role in the treatment of persistent or recurrent advanced ovarian cancer, primarily in patients who are potentially platinum sensitive yet intolerant of platinum analogues. Additionally, altretamine may be added to platinum-based regimens for induction therapy of advanced ovarian cancer. At the doses currently recommended, altretamine offers a reasonably well tolerated regimen that can be administered orally and is suitable for use on an outpatient basis.

Recurrent ovarian cancer. Effective radiotherapeutic palliation after chemotherapy failure

BACKGROUND

Recurrent ovarian cancer after frontline chemotherapy is incurable; however, palliation of focal lesions often is needed to alleviate symptoms. Because published response rates to palliative irradiation (RT) among patients failing cisplatin-based chemotherapy are scarce, the authors attempted to define the palliative role of radiotherapy for symptomatic, localized ovarian cancer recurrences. Factors predicting a response to RT also were sought.

METHODS

Between 1987 and 1993, 33 patients with ovarian cancer were irradiated at 47 sites with palliative intent after failing cisplatin-based chemotherapy regimens. Sites irradiated included the pelvis (n = 33), abdomen (n = 5), chest (n = 4), brain (n = 3), and other (n = 2). Median RT dose was 35 Gy (range: 7.5-45 Gy). The median fraction size was 2.5 Gy (range, 1-5 Gy). To determine dose effectiveness, the biologic effective dose (BED) was calculated according to the following formula: BED = total dose (1 + fractional dose/alpha/beta) using an alpha/beta value of 10. The median BED10 was 44 (range, 9-72).

RESULTS

For the entire group, complete palliative response was 51% and overall palliative response was 79%. The median duration of palliation was 4 months, which reflected palliation until death in 90% of cases. The overall response rates by symptoms were: pulmonary symptom relief in 75%, vaginal bleeding control in 90%, rectal bleeding control in 85%, pain relief in 83%, and neurologic symptoms controlled in 50%. The likelihood of obtaining complete symptomatic response was significantly increased among those with high Karnofsky performance status (KPS > or = 70 vs. KPS < 70; 69% vs. 36%, P < 0.03) and among those who received a higher biologically effective dose of irradiation (BED10 > or = 44 vs. BED10 < 44; 68% vs 35%, P < 0.03). Complete palliative response rates were not influenced by histologic differentiation, the number of previously administered cisplatin regimens, or patient age. Treatment-related acute morbidities included diarrhea in 5 of 38 (13%) patients treated through abdominal or pelvic fields, and esophagitis in 2 of 5 treated through thoracic portals. Only one severe late morbidity (small bowel obstruction) was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Durable palliation of patients with ovarian cancer that recurs after cisplatin-based chemotherapy can be achieved with local radiotherapy, especially among patients with high performance status. Biologically effective doses of at least 44 Gy10 (e.g., 3500 cGy/14 fractions = BED10 of 44) should be sought to maximize the probability of complete response. Such dose-fractionation schedules can be delivered expeditiously with acceptable tolerance. These results are comparable to the published experience of second-line chemotherapy in the treatment of focally symptomatic ovarian cancer recurrences.

Second-line chemotherapy for recurrent carcinoma of the ovary

Despite relatively high response rates to chemotherapy for ovarian carcinoma, most patients eventually will have progressive disease that will require additional therapy. Most efforts to study such second-line or "salvage" chemotherapy have been single-arm trials of small numbers of patients, which report widely variable response rates, relatively short response durations, and short survival times. Only recently have certain critical patient characteristics been recognized as important in determining appropriate therapy as follows: (1) the extent and volume of disease at recurrence and (2) the type and duration of response to prior chemotherapy. Patients with small-volume disease confined to the peritoneal cavity have a far better chance of achieving a response to second-line chemotherapy with subsequent prolonged survival than do those with bulky disease or disease outside the abdomen. Perhaps even more critical is the distinction between those patients whose neoplasm is still "clinically sensitive" to the platinum-containing compounds (initial response to platinum-based therapy and relapse more than 6 months after cessation of treatment) and those with "clinically resistant" disease (progression during or within 6 months of front-line platinum-based therapy). Those considered clinically sensitive to platinum-based therapy should be retreated with a platinum-containing regimen at the time of recurrence. Those with evidence for resistance should receive alternative treatment with one or more drugs capable of inducing responses in such patients. These drugs currently include: taxol, ifosfamide, and hexamethylmelamine.

Hexamethylmelamine as second-line therapy in platin-resistant ovarian cancer

A total of 61 patients with recurrent or persistent clinically measurable platin-resistant epithelial ovarian carcinoma were treated with 260 mg/m2 oral hexamethylmelamine daily for 14 days, repeated at 4-week intervals. Platin resistance was defined as progression or stable disease during cis- or carboplatin treatment (used alone or in combination with other drugs), or relapse within 6 months after the end of that therapy. Fifty patients were evaluable for response and 57 for toxicity. The objective response rate was 14% (3 complete and 4 partial responses). The response rate was higher in patients with relapse within 6 months than in patients with progression or stable disease on platin-based therapy. This observation underscores the importance of defining response and time to progression after first-line chemotherapy. The median duration of response was 8 months and the median survival in responding patients was 9+ months versus 5 months for patients with progression on hexamethylmelamine. Nausea and vomiting requiring antiemetic treatment occurred in 8 (14%) patients and reversible peripheral neuropathy in 3 patients. Two patients developed agitation, insomnia, and depression during hexamethylmelamine therapy. In conclusion, the 14% objective response rate and the occurrence of complete responses with oral hexamethylmelamine treatment in a group of ovarian cancer patients with true platin resistance are noteworthy.

Phase II trial of intravenous hexamethylmelamine in patients with advanced ovarian cancer

A Phase II trial of an intravenous preparation of Hexamethylmelamine was performed in ovarian cancer. Patients who had received prior Platinum based chemotherapy and had measurable disease were eligible. Among 15 evaluable patients, there were no objective responses. Two patients did show clinical and laboratory evidence of improvement. Toxicity was predominantly nausea and vomiting with minimal other toxicity. This intravenous form of Hexamethylmelamine has not shown meaningful activity in ovarian cancer patients who have failed prior platinum treatment.

Hexamethylmelamine chemotherapy for persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer

The purpose of this study was to determine the activity and toxicity of hexamethylmelamine chemotherapy in patients with persistent or recurrent epithelial ovarian cancer. Forty-nine women received hexamethylmelamine 100 to 150 mg/day for 14 days, repeated at 4-week intervals. All patients had previously received at least one chemotherapy regimen, and 46 (94%) had received cisplatin. Among 25 patients with clinically measurable disease there were three complete and two partial responses, for an objective response rate of 20%. The mean progression-free interval for responders was 38.6 months versus 9.6 months for nonresponders or patients with nonmeasurable disease (p less than 0.001). Thirteen patients are alive, eight with no clinical evidence for disease. Only four patients discontinued therapy because of toxic reactions. Hexamethylmelamine appears to be a well-tolerated drug with activity against ovarian cancer previously treated with cisplatin.

The role of hexamethylmelamine in the management of ovarian cancer

Hexamethylmelamine has been recognized as having useful single-agent activity for the treatment of ovarian cancer for the past 25 years, with some patients surviving disease-free for periods in excess of 12 years. Data from recently analysed and mature trials demonstrate that the addition of hexamethylmelamine to first-line combination chemotherapy results in significant improvements in survival compared to what is achieved with regimens of cisplatin and cyclophosphamide with or without doxorubicin.

Analysis of prognostic factors and survival in patients with ovarian cancer treated with second-line hexamethylmelamine (altretamine)

Hexamethylmelamine (altretamine, HMM) 260 mg/m2/day p.o. for 14 days followed by a 14-day drug-free interval was administered to 52 outpatients with advanced ovarian cancer who had previously been treated with chemotherapy. Prior to HMM, 92% (48/52) of these patients had received cisplatin and cyclophosphamide with or without doxorubicin. Two more patients received other cisplatin-based regimens. At the completion of HMM therapy, 15% (8/52) displayed no evidence of disease (NED). Of these eight patients, five are still alive 32 to 82 months after altretamine therapy (median follow-up of 46 months). At 41 months, one patient died of intercurrent illness with no clinical evidence of recurrence; the other two patients died of their disease at 21 and 31 months following HMM therapy. The median survival of the total group was 11 months: nine months for patients who did not respond to altretamine and 46+ months for patients with NED after altretamine (p less than 0.05). Intermittent oral administration of single-agent altretamine was well tolerated: eight patients reported moderate gastrointestinal symptoms, and only one patient reported severe gastrointestinal symptoms. Moderate neurologic toxicity was reported by five patients. No WBC fell below 2000 mm3 and platelet counts fell below 100,000 mm3 in only three patients; no patient experienced severe hematologic toxicity. In this series of patients, the overall response (15%) was comparable to or better than those reported for more toxic chemotherapeutic regimens. On the basis of these data and those reported by other investigators, HMM warrants consideration as a reasonable option in the management of recurrent or persistent ovarian cancer.

Altretamine

Altretamine is a National Cancer Institute-designated group C antineoplastic agent used in the treatment of advanced ovarian cancer. Altretamine is a highly lipid-soluble drug available only for oral administration as a capsule. The drug is activated through metabolic oxidation to intermediate methylol derivatives and formaldehyde. It is unclear which metabolite is the major species responsible for cytotoxicity or the primary mechanism of cytotoxicity. As a single agent in the treatment of ovarian cancer, altretamine demonstrates a response rate similar to other active agents in this disease (21-39 percent). The major utility of altretamine is in combination with other agents such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, fluorouracil, melphalan, and cisplatin. However, few randomized trials have evaluated the contribution of altretamine in these multiagent combinations. Dose-limiting toxicities include gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, anorexia), hematologic, and neurotoxic (peripheral neurotoxicity). The therapeutic role of altretamine is limited because of a toxicity profile similar to that of cisplatin, one of the more active agents in ovarian cancer. Its use should be reserved for patients who are not candidates for more standard platinum-based regimens.

Hexamethylmelamine as a single second-line agent in ovarian cancer

Fifty-two patients with advanced ovarian cancer were treated with single-agent hexamethylmelamine (HMM), 260 mg/m2 po per day for 14 days followed by 14 days off drug. All patients had been previously treated with chemotherapy. Of these patients, 92% (48/52) received cisplatin and cyclophosphamide +/- doxorubicin prior to hexamethylmelamine. Two additional patients received other cisplatin-based regimens. Fifteen percent (8/52) were found to have no evidence of disease (NED) at the completion of treatment with HMM. Five of these patients are alive at 12 to 65 months (median follow-up of 32 months); one patient died at 41 months of an intercurrent illness with no clinical evidence of recurrence; two patients died of recurrent tumor at 21 and 31 months. The median survival of the series of 52 patients is 11 months: 9 months for patients who did not respond versus 41 months for patients with NED post-HMM (P less than 0.05). The regimen was well tolerated: moderate gastrointestinal toxicity was reported by 8 patients; only one patient reported severe gastrointestinal toxicity. Moderate neurologic toxicity (primarily sensory) was reported by 5 patients, 3 patients experienced white counts less than 2000 or platelet counts less than 100,000, and no patient sustained severe hematologic toxicity. This moderate-dose intermittent regimen was associated with moderate toxicity and was well accepted by patients. The overall response is comparable to or higher than that reported for more toxic chemotherapy regimes. Based on these data and those recently reported by other authors, hexamethylmelamine should be considered in the treatment of recurrent ovarian cancer.

High-dose melphalan and autologous bone marrow support for treatment of ovarian carcinoma with positive second-look operation

Patients with epithelial ovarian carcinoma (OVCA) and positive second-look operation (SLO) have a poor short-term prognosis. Treatment after SLO is still controversial and pilot studies are justified in an attempt to improve survival of these patients. As OVCA is known to be a chemosensitive tumor, it seems logical to treat these patients with high-dose chemotherapy with the support of an autologous bone marrow transplantation. Fourteen patients underwent primary surgery with tumor debulking followed by cis-platinum-based chemotherapy. SLO was performed in each patient and was microscopically positive in five and macroscopically positive with secondary debulking in nine. All patients were treated after SLO with high-dose melphalan (HDM), 140 mg/m2, and autologous bone marrow support. HDM was well tolerated, with a median time to granulocyte recovery of 21 days. There was no death due to treatment toxicity. The mean follow-up after SLO is 43 months. Five patients (35.7%) are disease free at 30 to 60 months after SLO with no further treatment and, thus, a good quality of life. Four patients are alive with recurrent disease. Five patients died of OVCA; actuarial 3-year survival is 64%. This therapeutic procedure is well tolerated and seems to provide long-term survival for patients with no complete response after first-line chemotherapy. Therefore, it might also be applied to patients at high risk of recurrence after a negative SLO.

Phase II evaluation of peroral carmofur, cyclophosphamide, and hexamethylmelamine as a second-line therapy in advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma

A prospective phase II study was performed to evaluate the effect and tolerability of a peroral combination chemotherapy consisting of hexamethylmelamine, cyclophosphamide, and carmofur in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer previously heavily treated by cisplatin-based chemotherapy but no longer responding to it. Of the 27 patients 1 showed a clinical complete remission lasting 15+ months and 4 a partial remission of 6+ to 21 months. A further 7 patients had an unchanged situation of 4 to 13+ months. The median survival of the nonresponders was 3 months. The side effects were tolerable, mostly nausea and vomiting. Only 4 of 27 patients suffered from severe vomiting causing discontinuation of the therapy. The peroral ambulatory chemotherapy prolonged markedly the overall survival of about one-half of the patients with ovarian cancer who previously failed to respond to cisplatin-based chemotherapy.