Papillary peritoneal carcinomatosis after prophylactic oophorectomy

Surgically Induced Menopause-A Practical Review of Literature

Menopause can occur spontaneously (natural menopause) or it can be surgically induced by oophorectomy. The symptoms and complications related to menopause differ from one patient to another. We aimed to review the similarities and differences between natural and surgically induced menopause by analyzing the available data in literature regarding surgically induced menopause and the current guidelines and recommendations, the advantages of bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy in low and high risk patients, the effects of surgically induced menopause and to analyze the factors involved in decision making.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis after risk-reducing surgery in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers

BACKGROUND

Risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy (RRSO) is recommended for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers because of their increased risk of ovarian carcinoma. Despite RRSO, metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis occasionally is diagnosed.

METHODS

The literature was searched for BRCA1/2 mutation carriers with peritoneal carcinomatosis after risk-reducing surgery. The authors were asked for additional data. Clinical and histopathological data were descriptively analyzed. Cases were compared with a single-institution control cohort.

RESULTS

Of 36 cases, 86.1% concerned BRCA1 mutation carriers. The median age of the patients was 52 years (range, 30-71 years) at the time of risk-reducing surgery and 60 years (range, 37-75 years) at the time of diagnosis of peritoneal carcinomatosis. The median interval between the 2 events was 54.5 months (range, 11-292 months). Peritoneal carcinomatosis was mostly high-grade serous carcinoma. Histopathological details of the RRSO specimens were retrieved in 8 cases; 5 (62.5%) were found to have serous tubal intraepithelial carcinoma and 1 had epithelial atypia. Cases were older (P = .025) at the time of risk-reducing surgery and harbored more serous tubal intraepithelial carcinomas (P<.001) compared with women from the control cohort.

CONCLUSIONS

Metachronous peritoneal carcinomatosis after risk-reducing surgery occurs predominantly in BRCA1 mutation carriers, usually within 5 years. Data have suggested that surgery at a younger age lowers the rates of peritoneal carcinomatosis. These data can be used in the gynecologic counseling of BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. RRSO should include complete salpingectomy. Detailed histopathological examination of specimens removed during RRSO is essential. Cancer 2018;124:952-9. © 2018 American Cancer Society.

A surveillance conundrum: a case of 4 distinct primary malignancies in a BRCA-1 mutation carrier

Women with HBOC syndrome present a unique challenge to the oncology community, as will many genetic cancer syndromes yet to be discovered as genetic testing increases in availability. Issues of management and, most importantly, implication are yet to be elucidated. After a diagnosis of epithelial ovarian carcinoma lifelong follow-up is recommended. Given the high recurrence rate and dismal long term prognosis of advanced epithelial ovarian carcinoma this recommendation is more often than not moot. There are no clear guidelines or recommendations for surveillance designed for women with disease free survival greater than five years. This case presents a unique scenario of a woman with predictable disease that remains unpreventable.

[Retained ovarian remnant carcinoma: a case report]

Ovarian remnant syndrome is defined as residual ovarian tissue non intentionally left in place by the surgeon during a bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy. Patients present various symptoms usually including chronic pelvic pain, pelvic mass, bowel obstruction, hydronephrosis due to ureteral compression. We report a case of adenocarcinoma arising in such an ovarian remnant revealed by vaginal bleeding 5 years after total abdominal hysterectomy and bilateral oophorectomy for uterine fibroids. It was regarded as stage IIIc according to the FIGO classification because of common iliac lymph node involvement while there was no ascitis, no peritoneal nor omental implant but a unilateral hydronephrosis induced by extrinsec ureteral obstruction. Complete cytoreductive surgery was achieved including partial bladder and lower ureteral resection with colpectomy, omentectomy, pelvic and para-aortic lymphadenectomy. Paclitaxel-Platinum combination chemotherapy was given for nine cycles.

Intraperitoneal serous adenocarcinoma: a critical appraisal of three hypotheses on its cause

OBJECTIVE

Serous ovarian, Fallopian tube, and peritoneal adenocarcinomas are remarkably similar, both in their morphology, as well as in their clinical behavior. Despite extensive clinical and fundamental research, controversy still exists on the origin of serous female adnexal tumors. Difficulties in identification of site of origin at late stage the of disease at detection, when ovary, Fallopian tube, and the abdominal cavity are usually all involved, in addition to their macroscopic and microscopic resemblance, are major causes of this debate. In 3 hypotheses, 3 possible tissues of origin are proposed: the ovarian surface epithelium, the Fallopian tube epithelium, and the secondary Mullerian system.

STUDY DESIGN

We searched for all peer-reviewed articles and reviews that examined "serous ovarian carcinoma," "Fallopian tube carcinoma," "Mullerian system," "ovarian surface epithelium," "tubal epithelium," and "peritoneal." We included only articles that could give information on the origin of serous carcinomas. Additional articles were added by examining references of overview articles in relevant fields.

RESULTS

Discussed are the experimental data underlying these hypotheses.

CONCLUSION

An attempt is made to integrate the 3 hypotheses into a comprehensive model of serous intraperitoneal adenocarcinogenesis. It can be concluded that the Fallopian tubes play a major role in the development of female serous cancer.

Reducing breast cancer incidence in familial breast cancer: overlooking the present panorama

Familial breast cancer, whether associated or not with particular other breast cancer features (male, early onset, bilateral breast cancer), determines a wide and variable risk of developing breast cancer in the 'unpatients' (unaffected individuals) of these families, particularly in those harboring a genetic predisposition. The antiestrogen tamoxifen has been proposed in different trials to prevent breast cancer in women at risk. The NSABP-P1 study demonstrated that tamoxifen drastically reduced (by approximately 50%) the incidence of breast cancer in women at risk selected according to the Gail score. The preventive effect was particularly consistent in postmenopausal women and in those showing familial breast cancer (three or more affected patients). BRCA1/BRCA2 (BRCA1/2) gene analysis in women accrued in the NSABP-P1 trial who developed breast cancer showed that tamoxifen chemoprevention reduced breast cancer incidence in BRCA2 carriers. Different chemoprevention trials are ongoing to compare different selective estrogen receptor modulators and aromatase inhibitors with tamoxifen. The Italian Consortium of Hereditary Breast Ovarian Cancer recently developed the Aromasin Prevention Study, a multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled phase III study evaluating the effect of the aromatase inhibitor exemestane for chemoprevention in postmenopausal women carriers of BRCA1/2 genetic predisposition. Women who are postmenopausal unaffected carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations will be selected by participating institutions and randomly assigned to receive either oral exemestane or oral placebo every day for 3 years in order to reduce the incidence of breast cancer. Genetic counseling and the detection of predisposing BRCA1/2 mutations are mandatory before accrual into the study. Signed informed consents for the performing of BRCA1 and BRCA2 genetic analysis and for enrollment into the study are required. Eligible women will be followed thereafter in order to evaluate the efficacy of exemestane in reducing the incidental rate of breast cancer in unaffected postmenopausal carriers of BRCA1/2 mutations.

Efficacy of risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy in women with BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutations

Recognizing the emerging role of genetics in clinical care, in 1996 the American Society of Clinical Oncology established a Task Force on Cancer Genetics Education to develop educational opportunities and resources for its members. These efforts, and recent advances in the understanding of genetic predisposition to breast and ovarian cancers, have resulted in growing numbers of women participating in genetic testing protocols. The first prospective clinical trial involving women with known BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutations was recently published. In a prospective study involving 170 BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutation carriers and a mean follow-up of 2 years, the estimated 5-year cancer-free estimates were 96% for the 98 women choosing prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy and 69% for the 72 women choosing intensive surveillance (p=0.006). Three cases of stage I ovarian cancers were diagnosed at the time of prophylactic surgery. These results are consistent with published literature and data from the Prevention and Observation of Surgical Endpoints (PROSE) study group, which reported a 96% reduction in ovarian cancer risk and a 53% reduction in breast cancer risk among BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 mutation carriers who had prophylactic bilateral oophorectomy compared to matched controls. Thus prophylactic bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy can be regarded as an effective risk-reducing procedure that permits early diagnosis of ovarian cancer at the time of surgery and significantly reduces the risk of breast and ovarian cancer in women with germ-line mutations in the BRCA-1 and BRCA-2 genes.

Prophylactic oophorectomy in Ontario

OBJECTIVE

To determine the indications, patterns of practice, and complication rates for prophylactic oophorectomy in Ontario.

METHODS

From hospital discharge abstracts, 82 hospitals were identified where at least one patient had a prophylactic oophorectomy since 1992. Ethics approval for the chart review was obtained from 41 hospitals (50%), was denied at 10 (12%) and is pending at 31 facilities. Using the International Classification of Disease diagnostic code for family history of ovarian cancer (V16.4) and prophylactic oophorectomy (V50.42), the medical records departments were asked to retrieve the charts. One abstractor reviewed the charts using a standard form to collect demographic information, indications for surgery, details of surgery and complications.

RESULTS

From 1992-1998, 263 women underwent PO in 41 hospitals. A BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutation was recorded in 16 cases. Thirty-six patients had a past history of breast cancer. In 127 women, a family history was the sole reason for surgery; the remaining 136 women had a coexisting gynecologic complaint. Laparotomy was used exclusively in 155 cases, laparoscopy in 79 and vaginal access in 12 cases. Seventeen women required conversion to laparotomy during the operation. The mean length of hospital stay was 3.7 days (0-14 days). Thirty-six women (14%) had complications.

CONCLUSION

We have described the indications for surgery, trends in surgical practice and surgical complications for women receiving prophylactic oophorectomy in Ontario. Prior to prophylactic oophorectomy, the indications and benefits should be clear to both patient and physician. Optimally, all women should receive genetic counseling to help define risk for ovarian and breast cancer, medical and surgical options, impact of oophorectomy on cancer risk, risk of surgical complications, and the consequences and management of surgical menopause.

Peritoneal carcinoma in women with genetic susceptibility: implications for Jewish populations

Women from families with multiple cases of breast and ovarian cancer, specifically those who carry cancer-associated mutations of BRCA1 or BRCA2 are at increased life-time risk for peritoneal carcinoma, even after previous surgery to remove the ovaries, fallopian tubes and uterus. Hereditary breast-ovarian cancer (HBOC) syndrome and the associated BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are particularly prevalent in women of Jewish lineage, and specific BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations have been linked with peritoneal carcinoma and HBOC syndrome in Jewish populations, especially those of Ashkenazi descent. This review presents the currently available data and looks forward toward further and better understanding of peritoneal carcinoma in women with inherited susceptibility. Over 90% of peritoneal cancer in patients from HBOC syndrome kindreds and associated with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are serous carcinomas, which is equivalent with the proportion of ovarian cancers that are serous carcinomas in similar patients. The best indications are that while many peritoneal carcinomas in genetically susceptible women may arise directly from malignant transformation of the peritoneum, others might represent metastases from primary ovarian or fallopian tube carcinomas. Although the incidence of borderline ovarian tumors may not be increased in HBOC syndrome kindreds and those who carry cancer-associated BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, these individuals could be susceptible to malignant transformation of borderline lesions of the ovaries and peritoneum. Moreover, recent reports raise the question of possibly increased risk in Jewish carriers of germline BRCA1 mutations for uterine papillary serous carcinoma, which could be the source of metastasis to the peritoneum in some cases. The penetrance of cancer-associated BRCA1 mutations for ovarian cancer is estimated to be 11%-54%, and for BRCA2 mutations the penetrance for ovarian cancer is 11%-23%. So far, available screening methods appear to be insufficient for early detection of many ovarian cancers. Prophylactic oophorectomy has been found to reduce the risk for ovarian cancer in women from HBOC kindreds and those who carry cancer-associated BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations, leaving a residual risk for peritoneal carcinomatosis of well less than 5%. Therefore, surgical removal of the ovaries, fallopian tubes and uterus, after child-bearing has been completed and by early in the fifth decade of life, are appropriate prophylactic procedures in women whose genetic susceptibility puts them at increased risk for cancers of mullerian tract origin, including ovarian and fallopian tube carcinomas and possibly serous carcinoma of the uterus. Hysterectomy, as well as salpingo-oophorectomy, removes the gynecologic organs targeted for malignant transformation in genetically susceptible women and simplifies decisions regarding hormone replacement therapy and chemical prophylaxis and treatment of breast cancer. Unless a transabdominal operative approach is otherwise indicated, laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal techniques are well suited for intra-abdominal exploration, cytology, biopsies and prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy and hysterectomy in women with hereditary susceptibility to gynecologic cancer.

The Role of Estrogens in BRCA1/2 Mutation Carriers

Persons undergoing genetic testing for an inherited predisposition to cancer often raise questions about recommendations for follow-up care. Missing from current guidelines is consideration of the role of estrogens for BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carriers. Potential implications of hormones for risk of cancer and effectiveness of risk-reduction strategies need to be considered in the design of comprehensive guidelines for high-risk women. Patients who are mutation carriers may ask questions about the use of oral contraceptives, hormone replacement, and utility of current screening modalities. Controversy exists, even when considering these issues for the general population, but become more imperative when considering young, unaffected women who carry an inherited genetic mutation making decisions that may have long-term health consequences. Many patients have considered estrogen ablation via prophylactic surgeries as risk-reduction interventions. This article reviews data regarding these issues, makes recommendations based on available information, and offers future perspectives for those identified at high risk for cancer because of genetic predisposition. Although questions remain regarding the potential implications of hormones for risk of cancer and effectiveness of risk-reduction strategies, all information should be considered when educating and caring for such patients.

Prophylactic surgery and other strategies for reducing the risk of familial ovarian cancer

The goal of a cancer prevention program is to improve the mortality rates of patients. No risk-reduction strategy is proven to reduce mortality rates of women at increased risk for ovarian cancer. Methods of ovarian cancer surveillance are unproven in high-risk women. According to some studies, the use of oral contraceptives in high-risk women reduces ovarian cancer risk. Prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy is the most effective method of cancer risk reduction in women at high risk for ovarian cancer. However, women who undergo prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy remain at risk for primary peritoneal cancer. A minority of women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations are diagnosed with occult cancer at the time of surgical prophylaxis. Surgical prophylaxis should include complete removal of the fallopian tubes and ovaries, procurement of peritoneal cytology, and thorough evaluation of the tubes and ovaries by an expert pathologist. Beginning at age 30 years, women with BRCA1 and BRCA2 germline mutations should have an annual or semiannual screening, consisting of serum CA-125 measurement and transvaginal ultrasound, until the completion of childbearing. After the completion of childbearing and by age 40 years, women should undergo prophylactic salpingo-oophorectomy.

Frequency of BRCA mutations in primary peritoneal carcinoma in Israeli Jewish women

OBJECTIVE

The aim of the present study was to compare demographic and clinical characteristics of primary peritoneal carcinoma (PPC) to ovarian carcinoma (OvC) with regard to BRCA mutation frequencies.

METHODS

Incident cases of histologically confirmed cancer of the ovary or peritoneum diagnosed in Israeli Jewish women between March 1, 1994, and June 30, 1999, were identified within the framework of an ongoing nationwide epidemiological study of these neoplasms in Israel. The present study comprises 609 (81.5% of 747) Jewish women with epithelial stage III-IV OvC and 68 (77.3% of 88) Jewish women with PPC who were genetically tested for the BRCA mutations. Data from each patient were collected by the aid of a prestructured questionnaire and medical records. Blood samples or tumor tissue was tested for the 185delAG and 5382insC mutations in BRCA1 and the 6174delT mutations in BRCA2.

RESULTS

A carrier rate of 28% of any BRCA 1/2 mutation was observed among the PPC group and of 30% among the invasive stage III-IV OvC. No differences were found between PPC and OvC neither in the overall distribution of BRCA1/2 mutation carrier rates nor according to type of mutation, age, ethnic origin, and histologic subtype. Among women with a positive family history, a higher rate of mutation carriers was observed in the PPC group compared to the OvC group (72.7 vs 43.8%, respectively, P = 0.07).

CONCLUSIONS

The similar frequency distribution of BRCA1/2 mutations in PPC and OvC observed in the present study indicates that these mutations may predispose to PPC as well and that this neoplasm is part of the hereditary breast-ovarian cancer syndrome.

Hereditary cancers in obstetrics and gynecology

The lack of information regarding the effectiveness of screening strategies, chemoprevention, or surgical prophylaxis, and the uncertainty regarding penetrance and risk modification has led many experts to recommend that genetic testing for BRCA1, BRCA2, and other cancer susceptibility genes be performed only in a research setting. Patients, however, are likely to increasingly request access to genetic testing and deserve up-to-date counseling about recent advancements in our knowledge. The primary care physician should concentrate on identifying women likely to be at high-risk for cancer for further referral, allowing the cancer genetics specialist to track down medical records, clarify the pedigree, discuss genetic testing, and provide access to the appropriate cancer specialist to discuss risk reduction.

Familial ovarian cancer and early ovarian cancer: biologic, pathologic, and clinical features

Women with ovarian cancer have poor overall survival rates, largely because the disease is so often diagnosed at an advanced, less curable stage. Because women with early ovarian cancer experience good survival rates, there is great interest in the study and detection of early disease. Familial ovarian cancer has been relevant to the study of early ovarian cancer in two different ways. First, women from ovarian cancer families often undergo prophylactic oophorectomy to prevent development of this disease. These ovaries have been studied for pathologic or molecular features that might represent early preinvasive disease. Second, screening tests to detect presymptomatic ovarian cancer have selectively targeted this population because of the increased positive predictive value of these tests in this population. A review of the clinical, pathologic, epidemiologic, and molecular biologic aspects of familial ovarian cancer provides a background to facilitate understanding these issues.

Prophylactic surgery in women with a hereditary predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer

PURPOSE

To review the published literature on the efficacy and adverse effects of prophylactic mastectomy (PM) and prophylactic oophorectomy (PO) in women with a hereditary predisposition to breast and ovarian cancer and to provide management recommendations for these women.

METHODS

Using the terms "prophylactic," "preventive," "bilateral," "mastectomy," "oophorectomy," and "ovariectomy," a MEDLINE search of the English-language literature for articles related to PM and PO was performed. The bibliographies of these articles were reviewed to identify additional relevant references.

RESULTS

There have been no prospective trials of PM or PO for the reduction of breast cancer or ovarian cancer incidence or mortality. Most of the available retrospective studies are composed of women who had surgery for a variety of indications and in whom genetic risk was not well characterized. However, some reports in women at increased risk of breast or ovarian cancer have shown that PM and PO can reduce cancer incidence.

CONCLUSION

Interest in and use of PM and PO are high among physicians and high-risk women. PM and PO seem to be associated with considerable reduction in the risk of breast and ovarian cancer, albeit incomplete. The surgical morbidity of PM and PO is low, but the complications of premature menopause may be significant, and few studies address quality-of-life issues in women who have opted for PM and PO. Management recommendations for high-risk individuals are presented on the basis of the available evidence.

Grade 1 peritoneal serous carcinomas: a report of 14 cases and comparison with 7 peritoneal serous psammocarcinomas and 19 peritoneal serous borderline tumors

Low-grade peritoneal serous carcinomas have been the subject of limited study, and their distinction from peritoneal serous psammocarcinomas and serous borderline tumors is not always easy. The clinicopathologic features of 14 low-grade serous carcinomas, 7 psammocarcinomas, and 19 serous borderline tumors of peritoneal origin were compared. Average ages were 58 years (low-grade serous carcinomas), 48 years (borderline tumors), and 40 years (psammocarcinomas). Typical clinical presentations were abdominal pain, abdominal mass, or both, with the tumors incidental in 37% (borderline tumors), 43% (psammocarcinomas), and 36% (low-grade serous carcinoma). Operative and gross findings varied from nodules to adhesions to a dominant mass. Treatment was surgical debulking in most cases, with biopsy alone for eight borderline tumors. Seven patients with low-grade serous carcinoma were alive when last seen, but follow-up duration is short (average, 1.2 years): five were without disease, one had recurrent disease and one persistent disease. One patient with serous carcinoma died of disease at 3.5 years, and two patients died of other causes. Three patients with psammocarcinoma were alive without disease (average 3.3 years). Fourteen patients with borderline tumors were alive (average 3 years): 10 were without disease, 2 had persistent disease, and serous carcinoma developed in 2. The low-grade serous carcinomas resembled the invasive implants of ovarian serous borderline tumors. lacked high-grade nuclear atypia, showed tissue, lymphovascular space invasion, or both and had appreciable solid epithelial proliferation. Some serous carcinomas showed abundant psammomatous calcification suggesting psammocarcinoma but had too much epithelial proliferation for that diagnosis. The psammocarcinomas showed at least 75% psammoma bodies, no more than moderate cytological atypia, tissue or lymphovascular space invasion, or both, and rare epithelial proliferation less than 15 cells across. Adequate sampling was necessary to identify invasion, with highest yields of invasive foci in omental samples; individual foci in some cases of carcinoma resembled borderline tumor. The serous borderline tumors resembled the noninvasive implants of ovarian serous borderline tumors, lacked invasion, and did not show nuclear atypia of the degree seen in grade 2 or grade 3 serous carcinoma. Low-grade serous carcinoma, psammocarcinoma, and serous borderline tumors of peritoneal origin share some clinicopathologic features and may be underrecognized at surgery and gross examination. Because of overlapping microscopic patterns, adequate sampling is mandatory to identify small foci of invasion that exclude a borderline tumor and identify significant cellularity that excludes a psammocarcinoma. Conservative therapy is merited for younger women with borderline tumors. Maximum debulking is recommended for bulky symptomatic borderline tumors, low-grade serous carcinoma, and psammocarcinoma. Although short-term outcomes for the carcinomas appear favorable, follow-up is too limited to determine long-term outcomes.

Ovarian carcinoma. A review of the significance of familial risk factors and the role of prophylactic oophorectomy in cancer prevention

Women with a family history of ovarian cancer are at increased risk of ovarian cancer. Prophylactic oophorectomy (PO) remains the only effective method of ovarian cancer prevention. This study reviewed current data on the significance of family history and how prophylactic oophorectomy should be used in different risk groups. Approximately 7% of ovarian cancer patients have a positive family history of whom 3-9% may eventually manifest certain hereditary cancer syndromes. Women in direct genetic lineage of family cancer syndromes have up to a 50% lifetime risk of ovarian cancer. Because of the high risk, PO is indicated for women with familial cancer syndromes after childbearing or between the ages of 35-40 at the latest. The majority of women with a positive family history of ovarian cancer do not have one of the recognized syndromes. Women with one or two affected relatives have an increased lifetime risk of ovarian cancer from a baseline of 1.6 to 5-7%. This risk is not high enough to warrant PO for a large number of women. After being properly informed, the patient still chooses surgical prevention, she then receives PO. For women without a family history of ovarian cancer, the role of PO remains controversial. Assuming an annual incidence of 22,000 new cases of ovarian cancer, it is estimated that at least 1000 may be prevented if PO is diligently practiced during hysterectomy. Despite ovarian and breast cancer prevention, PO would lead to shorter life expectancy if estrogen therapy compliance were less than perfect. Thus, the decision on PO as a concurrent procedure should depend on the individual patient and her ability to comply with lifelong estrogen therapy.