Unilateral injections of a D2 but not D1 agonist into the frontal cortex of rats produce a contralateral directional bias

Toward an integrative perspective on hippocampal function: from the rapid encoding of experience to adaptive behavior

The mammalian hippocampus has been associated with learning and memory, as well as with many other behavioral processes. In this article, these different perspectives are brought together, and it is pointed out that integration of diverse functional domains may be a key feature enabling the hippocampus to support not only the encoding and retrieval of certain memory representations, but also their translation into adaptive behavior. The hippocampus appears to combine: (i) sensory afferents and synaptic mechanisms underlying certain types of rapid learning; and (ii) links to motivational, emotional, executive, and sensorimotor functions. Recent experiments are highlighted, indicating that the induction of hippocampal synaptic plasticity is required to encode rapidly aspects of experience, such as places, into memory representations; subsequent retrieval of these representations requires transmission through the previously modified hippocampal synapses, but no further plasticity. In contrast, slow incremental place learning may not absolutely require hippocampal contributions. The neocortical sensory inputs, especially visuo-spatial information, necessary for hippocampus-dependent rapid learning, are preferentially associated with the septal to intermediate hippocampus. In contrast, connectivity with the prefrontal cortex and subcortical sites, which link the hippocampus to motivational, emotional, executive, and sensorimotor functions, is primarily associated with the intermediate to temporal hippocampus. A model of functional differentiation and integration along the septo-temporal axis of the hippocampus is proposed, describing key hippocampal contributions to adaptive behavior based on information encoded during a single or a few past experiences.

Activation of dopaminergic neurotransmission in the medial prefrontal cortex by N-methyl-d-aspartate stimulation of the ventral hippocampus in rats

Many behavioral functions-including sensorimotor, attentional, memory, and emotional processes-have been associated with hippocampal processes and with dopamine transmission in the medial prefrontal cortex (mPFC). This suggests a functional interaction between hippocampus and prefrontal dopamine. The anatomical substrate for such an interaction is the intimate interconnection between the ventral hippocampus and the dopamine innervation of the mPFC. The present study yielded direct neurochemical evidence for an interaction between ventral hippocampus and prefrontal dopamine transmission in rats by demonstrating that subconvulsive stimulation of the ventral hippocampus with N-methyl-d-aspartate (NMDA; 0.5 mug/side) activates dopamine transmission in the mPFC. Postmortem measurements revealed that bilateral NMDA stimulation of the ventral hippocampus, resulting in locomotor hyperactivity, increased the homovanillic acid/dopamine ratio, an index of dopamine transmission, in the mPFC; indices of dopamine transmission in any of five additionally examined forebrain regions (amygdala, nucleus accumbens shell/core, lateral prefrontal cortex, caudate putamen) were unaltered. In vivo microdialysis measurements in freely moving rats corroborated the suggested activation of prefrontal dopamine transmission by demonstrating that unilateral NMDA stimulation of the ventral hippocampus increased extracellular dopamine in the ipsilateral mPFC. The suggested influence of the ventral hippocampus on prefrontal dopamine may be an important mechanism for hippocampo-prefrontal interactions in normal behavioral processes. Moreover, it indicates that aberrant hippocampal activity, as found in neuropsychiatric diseases, such as schizophrenia and mood disorders, may contribute to disruption of certain cognitive and emotional functions which are extremely sensitive to imbalanced prefrontal dopamine transmission.

Hippocampal modulation of sensorimotor processes

While the hippocampus makes unique contributions to memory, it has also long been associated with sensorimotor processes, i.e. innate processes involving control of motor responses to sensory stimuli. Moreover, hippocampal dysfunction has been implicated in neuropsychiatric diseases, such as schizophrenia and anxiety disorders, primarily characterized by non-mnemonic deficits in the processing of and responding to sensory information. This review is concerned with the hippocampal modulation of three sensorimotor processes in rats-locomotor activity, prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the startle reflex, and the startle reflex itself-whose alterations are related to human psychosis or anxiety disorders. Its main purpose is to present and discuss the picture emerging from studies examining the effects of pharmacological manipulations of the dorsal and ventral hippocampus by local drug microinfusions. While a role of the hippocampus in regulating locomotor activity, PPI, and startle reactivity has also been suggested based on the effects of hippocampal lesions, the microinfusion studies have revealed additional important details of this role and suggest modifications of notions based on lesion studies. In summary, the microinfusion studies corroborate that hippocampal mechanisms can directly influence locomotor activity, PPI, and startle reactivity, and that aberrant hippocampal function may contribute to neuropsychiatric diseases, in particular psychosis. The relation between different sensorimotor processes and hippocampal neurotransmission, the role of ventral and dorsal hippocampus, and the extrahippocampal mechanisms mediating the hippocampal modulation of different sensorimotor processes can partly be dissociated. Thus, the hippocampal modulation of these sensorimotor processes appears to reflect multiple operations, rather than one unitary operation.

Dopamine receptor blockade in the rat medial prefrontal cortex reduces spontaneous and amphetamine-induced activity and does not affect prepulse inhibition

The functions and interactions of cortical and subcortical dopamine systems are of interest because alterations in these systems have been implicated in neuropsychiatric diseases, such as schizophrenia. It has been proposed that prefrontal dopamine transmission may oppose dopamine transmission in subcortical sites, such as the nucleus accumbens. Accordingly, reduced prefrontal dopamine transmission would be expected to enhance or induce behavioral effects that have been associated with stimulation of accumbal dopamine receptors. In rats, spontaneous and amphetamine-induced activity is supported by dopamine receptor stimulation in the nucleus accumbens, while prepulse inhibition (PPI) of the acoustic startle response, which is used to measure sensorimotor gating and is disrupted in schizophrenia, is reduced by increased accumbal dopamine receptor stimulation. In the present experiments, we found that bilateral infusion of the dopamine D1/D2 receptor antagonist cis-flupenthixol dihydrochloride into the medial prefrontal cortex of Wistar rats (25 microg each side) reduced spontaneous activity and completely blocked induction of hyperactivity by systemic administration of D-amphetamine sulfate (1 mg/kg), while not affecting PPI. These findings do not support an antagonism between prefrontal and accumbal dopamine in the control of behavior. Rather, our data demonstrate that prefrontal dopamine transmission may modulate some behavioral processes in a similar way to accumbal dopamine.

Pharmacology and behavioral pharmacology of the mesocortical dopamine system

The prefrontal cortex (PFC) has long been known to be involved in the mediation of complex behavioral responses. Considerable research efforts are directed towards refining the knowledge about the function of this brain area and the role it plays in cognitive performance and behavioral output. In the first part, this review provides, from a pharmacological perspective, an overview of anatomical, electrophysiological and neurochemical aspects of the function of the PFC, with an emphasis on the mesocortical dopamine system. Anatomy of the mesocortical system, basic physiological and pharmacological properties of neurotransmission within the PFC, and interactions between dopamine and glutamate as well as other transmitters within the mesocorticolimbic circuit are included. The coverage of these data is largely restricted to what is relevant for the second part of the review which focuses on behavioral studies that have examined the role of the PFC in a variety of phenomena, behaviors and paradigms. These include reward and addiction, locomotor activity and sensitization, learning, cognition, and schizophrenia. Although the focus of this review is on the mesocortical dopamine system, given the intricate interactions of dopamine with other transmitter systems within the PFC and the importance of the PFC as a source of glutamate in subcortical areas, these aspects are also covered in some detail where appropriate. Naturally, a topic as complex as this cannot be covered comprehensively in its entirety. Therefore this review is largely limited to data derived from studies using rats, and it is also specifically restricted to data concerning the medial PFC (mPFC). Since in several fields of research the findings concerning the function or role of the mPFC are relatively inconsistent, the question is addressed whether these inconsistencies might, at least in part, be related to the anatomical and functional heterogeneity of this brain area.

Neuropeptide Y: intrastriatal injections produce contralateral circling that is blocked by a dopamine antagonist in rats

The brain is rich in neuropeptide Y (NPY) but its function is poorly understood. Previous studies have shown that intrastriatal injections of NPY stimulate dopamine (DA) release. In the present paper, behavioral studies evaluated the possibility that unilateral intrastriatal injections of NPY would produce contralateral circling that could be blocked by coinjection with a DA antagonist. Four experiments examined circling behavior in rats after unilateral intrastriatal microinjections (0.5 microliter) of: 1) amphetamine alone; 2) amphetamine with the DA antagonist cis-flupenthixol; 3) NPY alone; and 4) NPY with cis-flupenthixol. Each experiment consisted of seven test sessions; the first and seventh were preceded by no injection, the second and sixth by a control injection (saline or cis-flupenthixol with saline) and the third, fourth, and fifth by drug injections. Animals were scored during two 5-min intervals of a 20-min test session that began with the central injection and placement in a circular arena (30 cm diam.). Results indicated that the 25.0- but not the 6.0- or 12.0-micrograms doses of amphetamine and the 0.10- but not the 0.01- or 1.0-microgram doses of NPY produced contralateral circling. This directional bias was antagonized by cis-flupenthixol (20 micrograms in 0.5 microliter) in the case of amphetamine and fully blocked in the case of NPY. Results raise the intriguing possibility that contralateral circling induced by unilateral intrastriatal NPY may be mediated by DA.

N-methyl-D-aspartate unilaterally injected into the dorsal striatum of rats produces contralateral circling: antagonism by 2-amino-7-phosphonoheptanoic acid and cis-flupenthixol

To evaluate the possible contribution of dorsal striatal glutamate receptors to motor behavior, circling responses were observed in rats following unilateral intrastriatal microinjections of the agonist, N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) or the antagonist, 2-amino-7-phosphonoheptanoic acid (APH). The role of dopamine (DA) in NMDA-produced circling also was evaluated. In experiment 1, an NMDA dose of 5.0 micrograms (in 0.5 microliter), but not 0.5 or 0.05 microgram produced significant contraversive circling. In experiment 2, an APH dose of 10.0 micrograms but not 1.0 or 0.1 microgram produced significant ipsiversive circling. In experiment 3, microinjection of the ineffective 0.1 microgram dose of APH or a dose (20 micrograms) of the DA antagonist, cis-flupenthixol, that did not produce circling when administered alone, significantly reduced the circling response produced by the 5.0 micrograms dose of NMDA. As NMDA produced circling in the same direction as that seen following similar unilateral injections of locomotion-stimulating DA agonists, the present results suggest that glutamate, acting via NMDA receptors in the dorsal striatum, may exert an excitatory influence on motor systems. The observation that a DA receptor blocker antagonized the NMDA response further suggests that the observed motor excitatory effect of glutamate at NMDA receptors requires concurrent stimulation of DA receptors in the same region of the striatum.

Behavioral effects of intrastriatal caffeine mediated by adenosinergic modulation of dopamine

Although caffeine is generally classified as a psychomotor stimulant, the neurotransmitter systems mediating its effect on behavior have not yet been established. Mounting evidence suggests possible involvement of adenosinergic and/or dopaminergic (DA) systems. To evaluate these possibilities, four experiments examined circling behavior in rats following unilateral intrastriatal microinjections of: 1) caffeine alone; 2) the adenosine agonist, 2-chloroadenosine (2-CADO) alone; 3) caffeine with 2-CADO pretreatment; and 4) caffeine with pretreatment of the DA receptor antagonist, cis-flupenthixol. Each experiment consisted of seven test sessions; the first and seventh were preceded by no treatment, the second and sixth by control microinjections (saline or cis-flupenthixol) and the third, fourth and fifth by drug microinjections. Results showed that 10.0 and 20.0 but not 1.0 micrograms of caffeine produced a significant contraversive bias in circling behavior, while 2.0 and 5.0 but not 1.0 microgram doses of 2-CADO produced significant ipsiversive circling. Rats pretreated with central 2-CADO or cis-flupenthixol (in doses that did not influence circling bias when administered alone) prior to caffeine (10.0 micrograms) failed to exhibit a contraversive bias. Taken together, the present studies provide compelling support for the suggestion that the motor effects of intrastriatal caffeine are mediated by the antagonism of endogenous adenosine which, in turn, functionally increases DA.