The safety of inhaled beta-agonist bronchodilators during pregnancy

Systematic Review of Lymphangioleiomyomatosis Outcomes in Pregnancy and a Proposed Management Guideline

OBJECTIVE

 Lymphangioleiomyomatosis (LAM) is a rare, multisystem disease that primarily affects women of reproductive age. Disease progression has been linked to estrogen exposure, and as such many patients are advised to avoid pregnancy. Data are limited regarding the interaction between LAM and pregnancy, and as such we performed a systematic review to summarize available literature reporting outcomes of pregnancies complicated by maternal LAM.

STUDY DESIGN

 This was a systematic review including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, systematic reviews, case reports, clinical practice guidelines, and quality improvement studies with full-text manuscripts or abstracts in the English language with primary data on pregnant or postpartum patients with LAM. The primary outcome was maternal outcomes during pregnancy as well as pregnancy outcomes. Secondary outcomes were neonatal outcomes and long-term maternal outcomes. This search occurred in July 2020 and included MEDLINE, Scopus, clinicaltrials.gov, Embase, and Cochrane Central. Risk of bias was ascertained using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale. Our systematic review was registered with PROSPERO as protocol number CRD 42020191402.

RESULTS

 A total of 175 publications were identified in our initial search; ultimately 31 studies were included. Six (19%) studies were retrospective cohort studies and 25 (81%) studies were case reports. Patients diagnosed during pregnancy had worse pregnancy outcomes compared to those diagnosed with LAM prior to pregnancy. Multiple studies reported a significant risk of pneumothoraces during pregnancy. Other significant risks included preterm delivery, chylothoraces, and pulmonary function deterioration. A proposed strategy for preconception counseling and antenatal management is provided.

CONCLUSION

 Patients diagnosed with LAM during pregnancy generally experience worse outcomes including recurrent pneumothoraces and preterm delivery as compared to patients with a LAM diagnosis prior to pregnancy. Given that there are limited studies available, and that the majority are low-quality evidence and subject to bias, further investigation of the interaction between LAM and pregnancy is warranted to guide patient care and counseling.

KEY POINTS

· Data are limited on the effects of lymphangioleiomyomatosis on pregnancy outcomes.. · We performed a systematic review to summarize pregnancy outcomes complicated by LAM.. · Patients diagnosed with LAM during pregnancy experience worse outcomes..

Pharmacotherapeutic management of asthma in pregnancy and the effect of sex hormones

INTRODUCTION

Asthma is a common medical condition that can frequently affect pregnancy, and thus optimal management of asthma in pregnancy is important for both mother and baby. This article reviews recent developments of asthma pharmacotherapy and provides emerging data on the safety of asthma controller medications and biological therapies in pregnancy. The authors highlight the clinical outcomes of asthma during pregnancy, and summarize emerging new data related to the influence of sex hormones and fetal sex on asthma severity.

AREAS COVERED

This review of asthma pharmacotherapy during pregnancy examines the recent guidelines and reports the most pertinent publications on safety data and asthma management.

EXPERT OPINION

Asthma management during pregnancy follows the same principles as that of non-pregnant asthma. The available data for most asthma medications are reassuring, however there is a lack of adequate safety data available because pregnant women are generally excluded from clinical trials. More clarity is needed in guidelines regarding the management of asthma in pregnancy, and high-quality randomized control trials are required to strengthen the evidence base and inform future guidelines. In particular, safety studies examining biological therapies in pregnant women with severe asthma are needed.

Translating gammadelta (γδ) T cells and their receptors into cancer cell therapies

Clinical responses to checkpoint inhibitors used for cancer immunotherapy seemingly require the presence of αβT cells that recognize tumour neoantigens, and are therefore primarily restricted to tumours with high mutational load. Approaches that could address this limitation by engineering αβT cells, such as chimeric antigen receptor T (CAR T) cells, are being investigated intensively, but these approaches have other issues, such as a scarcity of appropriate targets for CAR T cells in solid tumours. Consequently, there is renewed interest among translational researchers and commercial partners in the therapeutic use of γδT cells and their receptors. Overall, γδT cells display potent cytotoxicity, which usually does not depend on tumour-associated (neo)antigens, towards a large array of haematological and solid tumours, while preserving normal tissues. However, the precise mechanisms of tumour-specific γδT cells, as well as the mechanisms for self-recognition, remain poorly understood. In this Review, we discuss the challenges and opportunities for the clinical implementation of cancer immunotherapies based on γδT cells and their receptors.

Using a Mixture-of-Bivariate-Regressions Model to Explore Heterogeneity of Effects of the Use of Inhaled Corticosteroids on Gestational Age and Birth Weight Among Pregnant Women With Asthma

Asthma is a heterogeneous disease, and responses to asthma medications vary noticeably among patients. A substantively oriented objective of this study was to explore the potentially heterogeneous effects of exposure to maternal inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) on gestational age (GA) at delivery and birth weight (BW) using a cohort of 6,197 pregnancies among women with asthma (Quebec, Canada, 1998-2008). A methodologically oriented objective was to comprehensively describe the application of a Bayesian 2-component mixture-of-bivariate-regressions model to address this issue and estimate the effects of ICS on GA and BW jointly. Based on the proposed model, no association between ICS and GA/BW was found for a large proportion of asthmatic pregnancies. However, a positive association between ICS exposure and GA/BW was revealed in a small subset of pregnancies comprising mainly preterm and low-birth-weight infants. A novel application of this model was also subsequently performed using BW z score instead of BW as the outcome variable. In conclusion, the studied mixture-of-bivariate-regressions model was useful for detecting heterogeneity in the effect of ICS on GA and BW in our population of women with asthma. These analyses pave the way for analogous uses of this model for general assessment of exposure effect heterogeneity for these perinatal outcomes.

On the use of the outcome variable "small for gestational age" when gestational age is a potential mediator: a maternal asthma perspective

BACKGROUND

The variable "small for gestational age," frequently defined as birth weight below the 10th percentile in a gestational age and sex-normalized population, is nowadays generally perceived as a more adequate measure than birth weight or low birth weight (birth weight < 2500 g) to capture fetal growth. However, the use of small for gestational age rather than birth weight or low birth weight as an outcome (dependent) variable may have important impacts on the interpretation of analyses aimed at estimating the causal effect of an exposure of interest on infants. We hypothesized potential differences in both types of effects estimated (direct or total) and in ability to control for confounding bias.

METHODS

We first examined the use of outcome variables birth weight and small for gestational age to get insights on modeling practices within the field of maternal asthma. Using directed acyclic graph simulations where gestational age was a potential mediator, we then compared estimated exposure effects in regression models for birth weight, low birth weight, and small for gestational age. Graphs with and without confounding were considered.

RESULTS

Our simulations showed that the variable small for gestational age captures the direct effect of exposure on birth weight, but not the indirect effect of exposure on birth weight through gestational age. Interestingly, exposure effect estimates from small for gestational age models were found unbiased whenever exposure effect estimates from birth weight models were affected by collider bias due to conditioning on gestational age in the models.

CONCLUSIONS

The sole consideration of the outcome small for gestational age in a study may lead to suboptimal understanding and quantification of the underlying effect of an exposure on birth weight-related measures. Instead, our results suggest that both outcome variables (low) birth weight and small for gestational age should minimally be considered in studies investigating perinatal outcomes.

Long-Acting β2-Agonists and Risk of Hypertensive Disorders of Pregnancy: A Cohort Study

BACKGROUND

Maternal asthma has been found to be associated with an increased risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP), that is, gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, and eclampsia. There is limited data, however, regarding the relationship between the use of long-acting beta-agonists (LABAs) during pregnancy and these outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate whether exposure to a LABA in addition to an inhaled corticosteroid increases the risk of HDP or preeclampsia/eclampsia, as compared with nonexposure to LABAs, in pregnant women with asthma.

METHODS

A cohort of 8,936 pregnancies in women with asthma who delivered between 1998 and 2010 was reconstructed using Quebec (Canada) health administrative databases. Cox proportional hazard regression models, adjusted for potential confounders, were used for statistical analyses. The primary exposure was LABA use (yes/no) measured on the first day of the 20th week of pregnancy. HDP were identified on the basis of recorded diagnoses and on prescriptions of antihypertensive drugs filled on or after the first day of week 20 of gestation.

RESULTS

There were 567 (6.3%) cases of HDP and 256 (2.9%) cases of preeclampsia/eclampsia in the cohort, and the rates of both disorders were similar in women exposed or not exposed to LABAs. LABA use was not associated with increased risks of HDP (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.69-1.33) or preeclampsia/eclampsia (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.89; 95% CI, 0.53-1.50).

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this study provide evidence suggesting the safety of LABAs for the treatment of asthma in pregnancy, in terms of the risks of HDP and preeclampsia/eclampsia.

Asthma in pregnancy: Physiology, diagnosis, and management

Asthma is a common, potentially serious, medical condition that affects an estimated 8% of pregnant patients, with 4% of all pregnant patients experiencing an exacerbation in the past year. Practitioners must be able to diagnose, educate, and treat such patients as they undergo significant physiological and immunologic change. But staying current can be challenging given over 3000 citations for "asthma and pregnancy" in a recent PubMed search, with 750 described as review articles. Patients have even more difficulty navigating information, with 29 million Google search results for this same query and 1.2 million alone for the question whether asthma medications are safe during pregnancy. This review provides brief answers to important management questions followed by supporting background literature.

Beta2-agonists use during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Short and long-acting beta2-agonists (SABA and LABA) have a crucial role in asthma management during pregnancy, as stated in the current guidelines.

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the evidence on beta2-agonists use during pregnancy and adverse perinatal outcomes.

DATA SOURCES AND STUDY SELECTION

Six databases were searched before January 1, 2013 for beta2-agonists use during pregnancy and congenital malformations, small for gestational age, mean and low birth weight, gestational age and preterm delivery. Original English language articles were included with no cut-off date. Quality assessment and post-hoc power calculations were performed.

RESULTS

Twenty-one original studies were identified. Four studies reported a significant increased risk of congenital malformations with SABA, while one study reported a significant decreased risk with high doses of SABA. One study reported a significant increased risk of congenital malformations with LABA and four studies reported a significant increased risk of congenital malformations with beta2-agonists (SABA and/or LABA). One study reported a decrease in birth weight centiles among LABA users.

LIMITATIONS

All studies reporting significant results, except two, used non-asthmatic women as reference group, making it difficult to differentiate between the effect of the disease from the one of the beta2-agonists. Non-significant results should be interpreted with caution due to the low statistical power of several studies.

CONCLUSION

Methodological limitations and lack of power of several studies prevent us to conclude on the perinatal safety of beta2-agonists. Until further evidence is available, physicians should continue prescribing them as recommended in the guidelines whenever needed to attain asthma control.

The risk of maternal and placental complications in pregnant women with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To investigate if maternal asthma is associated with an increased risk of maternal and placental complications in pregnancy.

METHODS

Electronic databases were searched for the following terms: (asthma or wheeze) and (pregnan* or perinat* or obstet*). Cohort studies published between January 1975 and March 2012 were considered for inclusion. Forty publications met the inclusion criteria, reporting at least one maternal or placental complication in pregnant women with and without asthma. Relative risk (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) was calculated.

RESULTS

Maternal asthma was associated with a significantly increased risk of cesarean section (RR = 1.31, 95%CI = [1.22-1.39]), gestational diabetes (RR = 1.39, 95%CI = [1.17-1.66]), hemorrhage (antepartum: RR = 1.25, 95%CI = [1.10-1.42]; postpartum: RR = 1.29, 95%CI = [1.18-1.41]), placenta previa (RR = 1.23, 95%CI = [1.07-1.40]), placental abruption (RR = 1.29, 95%CI = [1.14-1.47]) and premature rupture of membranes (RR = 1.21, 95%CI = 1.07-1.37). Moderate to severe asthma significantly increased the risk of cesarean section (RR = 1.19, 95%CI = [1.09-1.31]) and gestational diabetes (RR = 1.19, 95%CI = [1.06-1.33]) compared to mild asthma. Bronchodilator use was associated with a significantly lowered risk of gestational diabetes (RR = 0.64, 95%CI = [0.57-0.72]).

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women with asthma are at increased risk of maternal and placental complications, and women with moderate/severe asthma may be at particular risk. Further studies are required to elucidate whether adequate control of asthma during pregnancy reduces these risks.

The risk of congenital malformations, perinatal mortality and neonatal hospitalisation among pregnant women with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is conflicting literature on the effect of maternal asthma on congenital malformations and neonatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVES

This review and meta-analysis sought to determine if maternal asthma is associated with an increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched electronic databases for: (asthma or wheeze) and (pregnan* or perinat* or obstet*).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Cohort studies published between 1975 and March 2012 reporting at least one perinatal outcome of interest (congenital malformations, neonatal complications, perinatal mortality).

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

In all, 21 studies met inclusion criteria in pregnant women with and without asthma. Further analysis was conducted on 16 studies where asthmatic women were stratified by exacerbation history, corticosteroid use, bronchodilator use or asthma severity.

MAIN RESULTS

Maternal asthma was associated with a significantly increased risk of congenital malformations (relative risk [RR] 1.11, 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.02-1.21, I(2)  = 59.5%), cleft lip with or without cleft palate (RR 1.30, 95% CI 1.01-1.68, I(2)  = 65.6%), neonatal death (RR 1.49, 95% CI 1.11-2.00, I(2)  = 0%), and neonatal hospitalisation (RR 1.50, 95% CI 1.03-2.20, I(2)  = 64.5%). There was no significant effect of asthma on major malformations (RR 1.31, 95% CI 0.57-3.02, I(2)  = 70.9%) or stillbirth (RR 1.06, 95% CI 0.9-1.25, I(2)  = 35%). Exacerbations and use of bronchodilators and inhaled corticosteroids were not associated with congenital malformation risk.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Despite limitations related to the observational nature of the primary studies, this review demonstrates a small increased risk of neonatal complications among pregnant women with asthma. Further investigations into mechanisms and potential preventive interventions to improve infant outcomes are required.

Management of asthma during pregnancy

Asthma is an inflammatory lung condition that is the most common chronic disease affecting pregnancy. The changes in pulmonary physiology during pregnancy include increased minute ventilation, decreased functional residual capacity, increased mucus production, and airway mucosa hyperemia and edema. Pregnancy is also associated with a physiological suppression of the immune system. Many studies have described the heterogeneous immune system response in women with asthma during pregnancy, which partly explains why asthma has been shown to worsen, improve, or remain stable in equal proportions of women during pregnancy. Asthma may be associated with poor maternal and fetal outcomes. However, better maternal and fetal outcomes are observed with better asthma control. Asthma controller medications are generally thought to be safe during pregnancy, but limited data are available for some of the medicines. Newer medications like omalizumab open avenues for the treatment of asthma, but also pose a challenge, as there is limited experience with their use. Therefore, a multidisciplinary approach, including obstetricians, asthma specialists, and pediatricians should collaborate with the patient to carefully weigh the risks and benefits to determine an optimal management plan for each individual patient. The aim of this review article is to summarize the most recent literature about the immunological changes that occur during pregnancy, physiological and clinical implications of asthma on pregnancy, and asthma management and medication use in pregnant women.

Maternal asthma medication use and the risk of selected birth defects

OBJECTIVES

Approximately 4% to 12% of pregnant women have asthma; few studies have examined the effects of maternal asthma medication use on birth defects. We examined whether maternal asthma medication use during early pregnancy increased the risk of selected birth defects.

METHODS

National Birth Defects Prevention Study data for 2853 infants with 1 or more selected birth defects (diaphragmatic hernia, esophageal atresia, small intestinal atresia, anorectal atresia, neural tube defects, omphalocele, or limb deficiencies) and 6726 unaffected control infants delivered from October 1997 through December 2005 were analyzed. Mothers of cases and controls provided telephone interviews of medication use and additional potential risk factors. Exposure was defined as maternal periconceptional (1 month prior through the third month of pregnancy) asthma medication use (bronchodilator or anti-inflammatory). Associations between maternal periconceptional asthma medication use and individual major birth defects were estimated by using adjusted odds ratios (aOR) and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI).

RESULTS

No statistically significant associations were observed for maternal periconceptional asthma medication use and most defects studied; however, positive associations were observed between maternal asthma medication use and isolated esophageal atresia (bronchodilator use: aOR = 2.39, 95%CI = 1.23, 4.66), isolated anorectal atresia (anti-inflammatory use: aOR = 2.12, 95%CI = 1.09, 4.12), and omphalocele (bronchodilator and anti-inflammatory use: aOR = 4.13, 95%CI = 1.43, 11.95).

CONCLUSIONS

Positive associations were observed for anorectal atresia, esophageal atresia, and omphalocele and maternal periconceptional asthma medication use, but not for other defects studied. It is possible that observed associations may be chance findings or may be a result of maternal asthma severity and related hypoxia rather than medication use.

Beta2-agonists use during pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations

BACKGROUND

Treatment of asthma symptoms during pregnancy is crucial for maternal and fetal health. Short-acting beta2-agonists (SABA) are frequently used as rescue medications and long-acting beta2-agonists (LABA) are used as add-on controller therapy for asthma during pregnancy.

OBJECTIVE

The objective of this study was to investigate the association between exposure to SABA and LABA in the first trimester of pregnancy and the risk of congenital malformations among women with asthma.

METHODS

A cohort of pregnancies from women with asthma was formed through linkage of three administrative databases from Québec, Canada. The primary outcomes were major and any congenital malformations. The primary exposures were exposure to SABA and LABA during the first trimester, while secondary exposure was weekly SABA doses. The associations between congenital malformations (any, major, and specific) and SABA and LABA exposure were assessed with generalized estimating equations models.

RESULTS

From a group of 13,117 pregnancies, we identified 1242 and 762 infants with any (9.5%) and major (5.8%) congenital malformations, respectively. The adjusted odds ratios (95% confidence interval [CI]) for any malformations associated with the use of SABA and LABA were 1.04 (95% CI, 0.92-1.17) and 1.37 (95% CI, 0.92-2.17), respectively. The corresponding figures were 0.93 (95% CI, 0.80-1.08) and 1.31 (95% CI, 0.74-2.31) for major malformations. Significant increased risks of major "cardiac" and major "other and unspecified" congenital malformations were observed with LABA use.

CONCLUSION

Our study supports the evidence of SABA safety during pregnancy, but more research is required to assess whether the increased risk of malformations among LABA users is due to the medication, bias by asthma severity, or chance alone.

A meta-analysis of adverse perinatal outcomes in women with asthma

BACKGROUND

Asthma is a common condition during pregnancy and may be associated with adverse perinatal outcomes.

OBJECTIVE

This meta-analysis sought to establish if maternal asthma is associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcomes, and to determine the size of these effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Electronic databases were searched for the following terms: (asthma or wheeze) and (pregnan* or perinat* or obstet*).

SELECTION CRITERIA

Cohort studies published between 1975 and March 2009 were considered for inclusion. Studies were included if they reported at least one perinatal outcome in pregnant women with and without asthma.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

A total of 103 articles were identified, and of these 40 publications involving 1,637,180 subjects were included. Meta-analysis was conducted with subgroup analyses by study design and active asthma management.

MAIN RESULTS

Maternal asthma was associated with an increased risk of low birthweight (RR 1.46, 95% CI 1.22-1.75), small for gestational age (RR 1.22, 95% CI 1.14-1.31), preterm delivery (RR 1.41, 95% CI 1.22-1.61) and pre-eclampsia (RR 1.54, 95% CI 1.32-1.81). The relative risk of preterm delivery and preterm labour were reduced to non-significant levels by active asthma management (RR 1.07, 95% CI 0.91-1.26 for preterm delivery; RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.73-1.26 for preterm labour).

AUTHOR'S CONCLUSIONS

Pregnant women with asthma are at increased risk of perinatal complications, including pre-eclampsia and outcomes that affect the baby's size and timing of birth. Active asthma management with a view to reducing the exacerbation rate may be clinically useful in reducing the risk of perinatal complications, particularly preterm delivery.

Asthma in pregnancy

Worldwide the prevalence of asthma among pregnant women is on the rise, and pregnancy leads to a worsening of asthma for many women. This article examines the changes in asthma that may occur during pregnancy, with particular reference to asthma exacerbations. Asthma affects not only the mother but the baby as well, with potential complications including low birth weight, preterm delivery, perinatal mortality, and preeclampsia. Barriers to effective asthma management and opportunities for optimized care and treatment are discussed, and a summary of the clinical guidelines for the management of asthma during pregnancy is presented.

[Asthma and pregnancy. Review of the current literature and management according to the GINA 2006-2007 guidelines]

INTRODUCTION

Many pregnant women are asthmatics and maternal asthma is a source of questions and complications concerning both the progress of the pregnancy itself and the impact on the foetus. In this situation good asthma control is essential as the disease can deteriorate with acute exacerbations, possibly precipitated by reduction or even withdrawal of treatment on account of fear of teratogenicity.

BACKGROUND

Even though asthma treatments are not totally harmless during pregnancy, their use has been validated by several studies and guidelines. To help clinicians, we undertake here a review of the complications induced by maternal asthma and its medications, and then suggest management guidelines according to the most recent publications.

CONCLUSIONS

The risks and benefits of asthma treatments should be explained in a real partnership between the patient and her general practitioner and specialists (obstetrician, chest physician or allergist). In order to reduce complications to both mother and child, perfect control of asthma is required and inhaled steroids remain the treatment of choice for partially or uncontrolled asthma in the pregnant woman.

Asthma in pregnancy

Asthma is the most common significant chronic medical condition affecting young adults and it is therefore often encountered in pregnancy. Approximately 3% of women of child-bearing age suffer some degree of asthma and this prevalence is increasing. Some of the apparent increase is due to heightened awareness of the condition, although air pollution and increased childhood exposure to house dust mite may also be contributing.

Effect of maternal asthma and gestational asthma therapy on fetal growth

Asthma is a common chronic condition that might seriously complicate pregnancy and fetal development. This article provides a comprehensive review of the existing literature regarding the effect on fetal growth of maternal asthma and common asthma medications used during pregnancy, including short-and long-acting beta (2)-agonists, inhaled and oral corticosteroids, chromones, leukotriene receptor agonists, and theophylline. Evaluated outcomes of fetal growth include low birth weight, mean birth weight, small for gestational age, birth length and head circumference, and measures of asymmetrical growth retardation. Methodological and practical considerations related to safety of asthma medications in pregnancy and management of gestational asthma are discussed.

A comprehensive analysis of adverse obstetric and pediatric complications in women with asthma

RATIONALE

Previous studies have raised concern that women with asthma have increased risks of adverse obstetric and pediatric complications, but these have generally been underpowered.

OBJECTIVES

To quantify risks of major adverse pregnancy outcomes and obstetric complications in women with and without asthma.

METHODS

We extracted information on 281,019 pregnancies from the Health Improvement Network database between 1988 and 2004. We analyzed the data using logistic regression.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In 37,585 pregnancies of women with asthma compared with 243,434 pregnancies of women without asthma, risks of stillbirth and therapeutic abortion were similar; however, the risk of miscarriage was slightly higher (odds ratio [OR], 1.10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.06-1.13). Risks of most obstetric complications (placental abruption, placental insufficiency, placenta previa, preeclampsia, hypertension, gestational diabetes, thyroid disorders in pregnancy, and assisted delivery) were not higher in pregnancies of women with asthma compared with those without asthma, with the exception of increases in antepartum (OR, 1.20; 95% CI, 1.08-1.34) or postpartum (OR, 1.38; 95% CI, 1.21-1.57) hemorrhage, anemia (OR, 1.06; 95% CI, 1.01-1.12), depression (OR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.36-1.69), and caesarean section (OR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.16). Risks of miscarriage, depression, and caesarean section increased moderately in women with more severe asthma and previous asthma exacerbations.

CONCLUSIONS

We found some increased risks in women with asthma that need to be considered in the future; however, our results indicate that women with asthma have similar reproductive risks compared with women without asthma in the general population for most of the range of outcomes studied.

Use of short-acting beta2-agonists during pregnancy and the risk of pregnancy-induced hypertension

BACKGROUND

The effect of inhaled short-acting beta(2)-agonists (SABAs) on pregnancy outcome, especially hypertensive complications, is not well documented. After the finding of a possible protective association of inhaled SABAs with pregnancy-induced hypertension (PIH) in a previous study, we decided to further investigate their effect on this condition.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to determine the effect of inhaled SABA use during pregnancy on the risk of PIH (gestational hypertension, preeclampsia, or eclampsia) in asthmatic women.

METHODS

Three of Quebec's administrative databases were linked to constitute a cohort of asthmatic women who had at least 1 delivery between 1990 and 2000. A nested case-control study was performed using up to 10 control subjects matched to each case patient for the year of conception and gestational age. Statistical analyses considered 22 confounders.

RESULTS

The cohort was composed of 3505 asthmatic women who had a total of 4593 pregnancies. Three hundred two patients with PIH and 3013 control subjects were identified. Compared with nonuse, inhaled SABA use during pregnancy was significantly associated with a reduced risk of PIH (adjusted rate ratios: >0-3 doses/week, 0.62 (95% CI, 0.44-0.87); > 3-10 doses/week, 0.51 (95% CI, 0.34-0.79); and >10 doses/week, 0.48 (95% CI, 0.30-0.75)).

CONCLUSIONS

To our knowledge, this is the first study reporting that inhaled SABA use during pregnancy is associated with a reduced risk of PIH. Potential explanations include pharmacologic and physiological effects or residual confounding.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

These results increase the evidence about the safety of inhaled SABAs in this population, although they should not undervalue the importance of maintaining good control of asthma symptoms.

Asthma and pregnancy

Asthma complicates 4-8% of pregnancies. Mild and well-controlled moderate asthma can be associated with excellent maternal and perinatal pregnancy outcomes. Severe and poorly controlled asthma may be associated with increased prematurity, need for cesarean delivery, preeclampsia, growth restriction, other perinatal complications, as well as maternal morbidity and mortality. Optimal management of asthma during pregnancy includes objective monitoring of lung function, avoiding or controlling asthma triggers, patient education, and individualized pharmacologic therapy. Those with persistent asthma should be monitored by peak expiratory flow rate, spirometry to measure the forced expiratory volume in 1 second, or both. Step-care therapeutic approach uses the least amount of drug intervention necessary to control a patient's severity of asthma. Inhaled corticosteroids are the preferred treatment for the management of all levels of persistent asthma during pregnancy. It is safer for pregnant women with asthma to be treated with asthma medications than it is for them to have asthma symptoms and exacerbations. The ultimate goal of asthma therapy is maintaining adequate oxygenation of the fetus by prevention of hypoxic episodes in the mother. Asthma exacerbations should be aggressively managed, with a goal of alleviating asthma symptoms and attaining peak expiratory flow rate or forced expiratory volume in 1 second of 70% predicted or more. Pregnancies complicated by moderate or severe asthma may benefit from ultrasound for fetal growth and accurate dating and antenatal assessment of fetal well-being. Asthma medications should be continued during labor, and parturients should be encouraged to breastfeed.

[Treatment strategies in rhinoconjunctivitis and asthma during pregnancy]

BACKGROUND

The incidence of asthma is high, especially in young people, a population group that includes women of reproductive age. We reviewed recent publications on asthma control during pregnancy to avoid undesired effects on both the mother and fetus. The prevalence of rhinoconjunctivitis is also high, although this disease is often under-treated by physicians. The use of beta2-agonists, corticoids (systemic/inhaled/nebulized), epinephrine and specific allergen immunotherapy is discussed.

METHODS

We reviewed recent publications on asthma during pregnancy as well as other articles of interest. Articles providing data on drug therapy, overall strategies and patient education were selected. Sufficient drugs are available for the management of this disease and under-treatment cannot be justified.

CONCLUSIONS

Pregnancy is not a disease, but constitutes a period when special care must be taken with underlying diseases. The aim of asthma treatment during pregnancy is to prevent fetal complications due to the effects of medication and asthma crises by keeping the mother symptom free and preventing possible exacerbations. Almost all authors agree that asthma crises in pregnant women should be treated no differently from those in non-pregnant women. Treatment of rhinoconjunctivitis should not be stopped during pregnancy since a wide variety of FDA category B drugs is available. Specific allergen immunotherapy should not be suspended during pregnancy as it is not contraindicated. However, this therapy should not be initiated during pregnancy.

[Asthma and pregnancy -- efficacy and safety of medication during pregnancy]

Bronchial asthma is one of the most common medical problems in pregnancy, with prevalance around 4-7 %. Asthma clinical course is variable, with worsening of symptoms in one third of the cases. The most critical period occurs between the 24th and 36th week of gestation. Symptoms usually regress completely after delivery during the following three months and they are expected to recur, with the same pattern, in subsequent pregnancies. Asthma control during pregnancy depends on pregnant patient education and safe medication, preferably inhaled, that prevents crises. In chronic asthma, usually prescribed drugs (inhaled corticosteroids: beclometasone and budesonide) are effective and safe to the fetus. There are several drugs to be added to inhaled steroids -- beta agonists bronchodilators: short and long acting -- according to the severity of bronchial constriction and frequency of crises. Treatment of acute asthma should follow recommended guidelines, since uncontrolled asthma increases more the risk of pregnancy complications (low birth weight and premature delivery) than the eventual medication risks to pregnancy.

Acute asthma in pregnancy

Asthma is one of the most common medical conditions that can complicate pregnancy. Although most pregnant women with asthma have controlled disease, some women may experience exacerbation of their disease, necessitating immediate intervention. This article discusses the interrelations between asthma and pregnancy and presents an overview on the management of pregnant women presenting to the hospital with acute severe asthma. Treating physicians must overcome the common belief that pregnant women should not take any medications during pregnancy, and they should keep asthma in pregnant women under control to minimize the risk for maternal and fetal hypoxia.

General strategy for the management of bronchial asthma in pregnancy

Epidemiological studies showed that bronchial asthma is one of the most common diseases which can complicate pregnancy (1-7%). In about 0.05-2% of the cases, asthma occurs as a life-threatening event. In the common medical practice a waiting strategy or, even, the complete refusal for drug therapies are frequently observed. This is justified by the fear of the possible adverse effects of drugs on developing fetus. On the contrary, several studies have demonstrated that severe and uncontrolled asthma may produce serious maternal and fetal complications, such as gestational hypertension and eclampsia, fetal hypoxemia and an increased risk of perinatal death. Therefore, all pregnant women suffering from bronchial asthma should be considered as potentially at high risk of complications and adequately treated. Since asthma is a chronic disease with acute exacerbations, a continuous treatment is mandatory to control symptoms, to prevent acute episodes and to reduce the degree of airway inflammation. The global strategy for asthma management in pregnancy includes five main topics: (1) objective evaluation of maternal/ fetal clinical conditions; (2) avoidance/control of triggering factors; (3) pharmacological treatment; (4) educational support; (5) psychological support. As far as drug therapy is concerned, the International Guidelines and Recommendations suggest that the general strategy does not differ significantly from management outside pregnancy. We herein review and discuss the available data and the criteria for the management of asthma in pregnant patients.

Asthma evaluation and management

Asthma is a chronic inflammatory illness with acute exacerbations, which often is encountered in the ED setting. Knowledge of the presentation and treatment of asthma is crucial for any physician treating patients with this disease. Beta-agonist, anticholinergic, and corticosteroid therapy continue to be the mainstay of emergency therapy despite advances in newer medications. Proper attention to long-term treatment of asthma and aggressive treatment of acute exacerbations should help reduce morbidity and mortality.

Asthma in pregnancy

Although about 1% of pregnant women have asthma, it is often underrecognized and suboptimally treated. The course of asthma during pregnancy varies; it improves, remains stable, or worsens in similar proportions of women. The risk of an asthma exacerbation is high immediately postpartum, but the severity of asthma usually returns to the preconception level after delivery and often follows a similar course during subsequent pregnancies. Changes in beta(2)-adrenoceptor responsiveness and changes in airway inflammation induced by high levels of circulating progesterone have been proposed as possible explanations for the effects of pregnancy on asthma. Good control of asthma is essential for maternal and fetal well-being. Acute asthmatic attacks can result in dangerously low fetal oxygenation. Chronically poor control is associated with pregnancy-induced hypertension, preeclampsia, and uterine hemorrhage, as well as greater rates of cesarian section, preterm delivery, intrauterine growth retardation, low birth weight, and congenital malformation. Women with well-controlled asthma during pregnancy, however, have outcomes as good as those in their nonasthmatic counterparts. Inhaled therapies remain the cornerstone of treatment; most appear to be safe in pregnancy.

Asthma education: creating a partnership

This article advances the theory that the key to creating an effective partnership is teaching asthma patients what to self-treat, how to self-treat, and when to consult a clinician. The five comanaging rules that the health educator is encouraged to emphasize with the adult asthma patient are: know your own unique asthma symptoms and triggers; keep written records; see appropriate specialists; know your medicines and follow your action plan; and accept no treatment you do not understand. Current research shows asthma to be a chronic inflammatory disorder of the airways. In susceptible individuals, this inflammation causes recurrent episodes of wheezing, breathlessness, chest tightness, and cough, particularly at night and in the early morning. The stepwise approach to asthma therapy divides asthma into several levels of severity. However, patients at any level of severity can have mild, moderate, or severe exacerbations. Asthma triggers; how to use a metered dose inhaler (MDI), a dry powder inhaler (DPI), and a peak flow meter; and how to follow an asthma action plan are thoroughly covered. The last section of the article deals at length with the indications for and actions of long-term-control medications, used to achieve and maintain control of persistent asthma, and quick-relief medications, used to treat symptoms and exacerbations.

Risk of congenital malformations associated with treatment of asthma during early pregnancy

Studies assessing the risk of congenital malformations associated with the treatment of asthma during the first trimester of pregnancy are few, have limited power and support continuation of treatment.

Acute asthma among pregnant women presenting to the emergency department

Asthma complicates up to 4% of pregnancies. Our objective was to compare emergency department (ED) visits for acute asthma among pregnant versus nonpregnant women. We performed a prospective cohort study, as part of the Multicenter Asthma Research Collaboration. ED patients who presented with acute asthma underwent a structured interview in the ED, and another by telephone 2 wk later. The study was performed at 36 EDs in 18 states. A total of 51 pregnant women and 500 nonpregnant women, age 18 to 39, were available for analysis. Pregnant women did not differ from nonpregnant women by duration of asthma symptoms (median: 0.75 versus 0.75 d, p = 0.57) or initial peak expiratory flow rate (PEFR) (51% versus 53% of predicted, p = 0.52). Despite this similarity, only 44% of pregnant women were treated with corticosteroids in the ED compared with 66% of nonpregnant women (p = 0.002). Pregnant women were equally likely to be admitted (24% versus 21%, p = 0.61) but less likely to be prescribed corticosteroids if sent home (38% versus 64%, p = 0.002). At 2-wk follow-up, pregnant women were 2.9 times more likely to report an ongoing exacerbation (95% CI, 1.2 to 6.8). Among women presenting to the ED with acute asthma, pregnant asthmatics are less likely to receive appropriate treatment with corticosteroids.

Infant and maternal outcomes in the pregnancies of asthmatic women

We examined the relationship between infant and maternal outcomes and asthma complicating pregnancy, using historical cohort analysis of singleton live deliveries in New Jersey hospitals between 1989 and 1992 (n = 447,963). Subject mother-infant dyads were identified from linked birth certificate and maternal and newborn hospital claims data. Women with an International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, Clinical Modification (ICD-9-CM) diagnosis code (493) for asthma (n = 2,289) were compared with a fourfold larger randomly selected control sample (n = 9,156) from the remaining pool of women. After controlling for the effects of important confounding variables, maternal asthma was associated with the following adverse infant outcomes: preterm infant (odds ratio [OR] = 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.18 to 1.55), low birth weight (OR = 1. 32; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.58), small-for-gestational age (OR = 1.26; 95% CI, 1.10 to 1.45), congenital anomalies (OR = 1.37; 95% CI, 1.12 to 1.68), and increased infant hospital length of stay (OR = 1.44; 95% CI, 1.25 to 1.65). The adverse maternal outcomes associated with maternal asthma were: pre-eclampsia (OR = 2.18; 95% CI, 1.68 to 2. 83), placenta previa (OR = 1.71; 95% CI, 1.05 to 2.79), cesarean delivery (OR = 1.62; 95% CI, 1.46 to 1.80), and increased maternal hospital length of stay (OR = 1.86; 95% CI, 1.60 to 2.15). The results emphasize the need for maternal asthma to be added to the list of conditions that increase the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes.

Pharmacologic therapy of asthma during pregnancy

Asthma is a common, potentially serious medical complication during pregnancy. Optimal clinical and pharmacologic management is necessary to mitigate maternal and fetal complications. Mild asthma may be managed in most cases with inhaled beta 2-mimetics. Anti-inflammatory therapy is recommended for the treatment of moderate and severe asthma. Based on limited human experience, beclomethasone is currently the recommended inhaled corticosteroid during pregnancy. However, other inhaled corticosteroids may have advantages compared to beclomethasone because of reduced systemic absorption, which may adversely affect intrauterine growth. Based upon theoretic considerations, theophylline is now considered a secondary therapy, but data demonstrating the superiority of inhaled corticosteroids versus theophylline during pregnancy are lacking.

Pulmonary pharmacology

This article reviews the basic principles of pharmacodynamics and pharmacokinetics, with a special emphasis on the pharmacologic considerations that must be taken into account when treating the patient with respiratory disease who is also pregnant or nursing the neonate. A description of the four classes of therapeutic agents used for COPD is given with a discussion of the scientific evidence for their safety during pregnancy. The understanding of asthma suggests that bronchodilators relieve the symptoms, while antiinflammatories suppress the disease. Direct administration to the target tissue by inhalation of the bronchodilators (beta-adrenoreceptor agonists and anticholinergics) and immunosuppressors (corticosteroids and cromolyn) leads to low systemic levels of these drugs, which reduces fetal drug exposure. Oral administration of beta-adrenoreceptor agonists, corticosteroids, and theophylline may be necessary to obtain sufficient maternal lung function and ensure adequate oxygenation of the fetus. This must be carefully weighed against the potential fetal and maternal risks involved with increased systemic levels of these drugs. A brief description of classes of drugs used for upper respiratory diseases (antihistamines, alpha-adrenergic agonists, corticosteroids, antitussives, and expectorants) and their safety during pregnancy is also given. There is concern that most alpha-adrenergic agonists increase blood pressure at therapeutic doses needed to relieve nasal congestion. Therefore, for pregnant patients requiring decongestants, opinion favors administration of pseudoephedrine, which has the most favorable therapeutic index, to reduce potential cardiovascular adverse reactions in the fetus. Intranasal administration of the newer corticosteroids, which have limited absorption, is useful for suppression of allergic rhinitis, while minimizing the risk of adverse reactions. The purpose of this article has been to provide pharmacologic/toxicologic information about commonly used respiratory drugs. This will to enable the clinician to make an educated decision regarding the choice of therapy for respiratory disorders to ensure that fetal and maternal outcomes are optimal.

Asthma in the pregnant adolescent: a review

Adolescent pregnancy has increased in the past decade (1-5), often in association with poverty, poor education, and inadequate prenatal care. While it has been suggested that adverse pregnancy outcomes are more common among adolescents in the inner city, recent data show that in a white, middle-class population teenaged mothers are more likely to have adverse pregnancy outcomes (5). Asthma is also becoming more common, with an incidence of at least 6.6% in 15-16 year old girls (6,7). Poverty and living in the inner city are associated with increased morbidity and mortality from asthma (8-11). Adolescents with asthma who become pregnant provide an added challenge to the physician who must consider the impact of the pregnancy on the asthma and vice versa. The physician must understand the effects of both the asthma medication and/or poorly controlled disease on the fetus. The physician must also be able to convey this information to the adolescent in a developmentally appropriate manner to enable the patient to make informed health care decisions (12).

Management of severe exacerbations of asthma

Asthma is a common disease that afflicts as many as 5% of Americans. Severe exacerbations of asthma can be life-threatening if not treated aggressively. Despite publication of therapeutic guidelines developed by experts in this field, the clinical management of severe exacerbations of asthma varies widely among institutions and practitioners. This article briefly reviews the pathophysiology of asthma and outlines a systematic, mechanistic approach to treating patients with severe asthma that integrates many clinical advancements made during the past 5 to 10 years.