Hypotension with midazolam and fentanyl in the newborn

The Use of Midazolam as an Antiseizure Medication in Neonatal Seizures: Single Center Experience and Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Existing therapeutic alternatives for neonatal crises have expanded in recent decades, but no consensus has been reached on protocols based on neonatal seizures. In particular, little is known about the use of midazolam in newborns.

AIM

The aim of our study is to evaluate the response to midazolam, the appearance of side effects, and their impact on therapeutic decisions.

METHODS

This is a STROBE-conformed retrospective observational study of 10 patients with neonatal seizures unresponsive to common antiseizure drugs, admitted to San Marco University Hospital's neonatal intensive care (Catania, Italy) from September 2015 to October 2022. In our database search, 36 newborns were treated with midazolam, but only ten children met the selection criteria for this study.

RESULTS

Response was assessed both clinically and electrographic. Only 4 patients at the end of the treatment showed a complete electroclinical response; they were full-term infants with a postnatal age greater than 7 days. Non-responders and partial responders are all premature (4/10) or full-term neonates who started therapy in the first days of life (< 7th day) (2/10).

CONCLUSION

Neonatal seizures in preterm show a lower response rate to midazolam than seizures in full-term infants, with poorer prognosis. Liver and renal function and central nervous system development are incomplete in premature infants and the first days of life. In this study, we show that midazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine, appears to be most effective in full-term infants and after 7 days of life.

Midazolam: an essential palliative care drug

Midazolam is a commonly used benzodiazepine in palliative care and is considered one of the four essential drugs needed for the promotion of quality care in dying patients. Acting on the benzodiazepine receptor, it promotes the action of gamma-aminobutyric acid. Gamma-aminobutyric acid action promotes sedative, anxiolytic, and anticonvulsant properties. Midazolam has a faster onset and shorter duration of action than other benzodiazepines such as diazepam and lorazepam lending itself to greater flexibility in dosing than other benzodiazepines. The kidneys excrete midazolam and its active metabolite. Metabolism occurs in the liver by the P450 system. This article examines the pharmacology, pharmacodynamics, and clinical uses of midazolam in palliative care.

Efficacy and Safety of Fentanyl in Combination with Midazolam in Children on Mechanical Ventilation

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of fentanyl for sedation therapy in mechanically ventilated children.

METHODS

This was a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of mechanically ventilated patients between 2 months and 18 years of age. Patients were randomly divided into two groups; the control group with midazolam alone, and the combination group with both fentanyl and midazolam. The sedation level was evaluated using the Comfort Behavior Scale (CBS), and the infusion rates were adjusted according to the difference between the measured and the target CBS score.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients were recruited and randomly allocated, with 22 patients in both groups. The time ratio of cumulative hours with a difference in CBS score (measured CBS-target CBS) of ≥ 4 points (i.e., under-sedation) was lower in the combination group (median, 0.06; interquartile range [IQR], 0-0.2) than in the control group (median, 0.15; IQR, 0.04-0.29) (P < 0.001). The time ratio of cumulative hours with a difference in CBS score of ≥ 8 points (serious under-sedation) was also lower in the combination group (P < 0.001). The cumulative amount of midazolam used in the control group (0.11 mg/kg/hr; 0.07-0.14 mg/kg/hr) was greater than in the combination group (0.07 mg/kg/hr; 0.06-0.11 mg/kg/hr) (P < 0.001). Two cases of hypotension in each group were detected but coma and ileus, the major known adverse reactions to fentanyl, did not occur.

CONCLUSION

Fentanyl combined with midazolam is safe and more effective than midazolam alone for sedation therapy in mechanically ventilated children.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02172014.

Practice Guidelines for Moderate Procedural Sedation and Analgesia 2018

Supplemental Digital Content is available in the text.

[A rare complication of generalized tetanus: pulmonary embolism]

Le tétanos est une maladie caractérisée par une paralysie spastique et des spasmes. C’est une pathologie grave. Elle nécessite une prise en charge en milieu de réanimation. La mortalité est essentiellement liée aux complications neurovégétatives et infectieuses. Les complications thromboemboliques sont exceptionnelles au cours de cette maladie. A notre connaissance, l’embolie pulmonaire n’a jamais été rapportée et confirmée au cours du tétanos généralisé. Nous présentons à travers cette observation un cas de tétanos généralisé compliqué d’une embolie pulmonaire fibrino cruorique.

Intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Proper sedation for neonates undergoing uncomfortable procedures may reduce stress and avoid complications. Midazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine that is used increasingly in neonatal intensive care units (NICUs). However, its effectiveness as a sedative in neonates has not been systematically evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

Primary objeciveTo assess the effectiveness of intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation, as evaluated by behavioural and/or physiological measurements of sedation levels, in critically ill neonates in the NICU. Secondary objectivesTo assess effects of intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation on complications including the following.1. Incidence of intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH)/periventricular leukomalacia (PVL).2. Mortality.3. Occurrence of adverse effects associated with the use of midazolam (hypotension, neurological abnormalities).4. Days of ventilation.5. Days of supplemental oxygen.6. Incidence of pneumothorax.7. Length of NICU stay (days).8. Long-term neurodevelopmental outcomes.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We selected for review randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation in infants aged 28 days or younger.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

We abstracted data regarding the primary outcome of level of sedation. We assessed secondary outcomes such as intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leukomalacia, death, length of NICU stay and adverse effects associated with midazolam. When appropriate, we performed meta-analyses using risk ratios (RRs) and risk differences (RDs), and if the RD was statistically significant, we calculated the number needed to treat for an additional beneficial outcome (NNTB) or an additional harmful outcome (NNTH), along with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for categorical variables, and weighted mean differences (WMDs) for continuous variables. We assessed heterogeneity by performing the I-squared (I2) test.

MAIN RESULTS

We included in the review three trials enrolling 148 neonates. We identified no new trials for this update. Using different sedation scales, each study showed a statistically significantly higher sedation level in the midazolam group compared with the placebo group. However, none of the sedation scales used have been validated in preterm infants; therefore, we could not ascertain the effectiveness of midazolam in this population. Duration of NICU stay was significantly longer in the midazolam group than in the placebo group (WMD 5.4 days, 95% CI 0.40 to 10.5; I2 = 0%; two studies, 89 infants). One study (43 infants) reported significantly lower Premature Infant Pain Profile (PIPP) scores during midazolam infusion than during dextrose (placebo) infusion (MD -3.80, 95% CI -5.93 to -1.67). Another study (46 infants) observed a higher incidence of adverse neurological events at 28 days' postnatal age (death, grade III or IV IVH or PVL) in the midazolam group compared with the morphine group (RR 7.64, 95% CI 1.02 to 57.21; RD 0.28, 95% CI 0.07 to 0.49; NNTH 4, 95% CI 2 to 14) (tests for heterogeneity not applicable). We considered these trials to be of moderate quality according to GRADE assessment based on the following outcomes: mortality during hospital stay, length of NICU stay, adequacy of analgesia according to PIPP scores and poor neurological outcomes by 28 days' postnatal age.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Data are insufficient to promote the use of intravenous midazolam infusion as a sedative for neonates undergoing intensive care. This review raises concerns about the safety of midazolam in neonates. Further research on the effectiveness and safety of midazolam in neonates is needed.

Anticonvulsant effectiveness and hemodynamic safety of midazolam in full-term infants treated with hypothermia

BACKGROUND

Midazolam is used as an anticonvulsant in neonatology, including newborns with perinatal asphyxia treated with hypothermia. Hypothermia may affect the safety and effectiveness of midazolam in these patients.

OBJECTIVES

The objective was to evaluate the anticonvulsant effectiveness and hemodynamic safety of midazolam in hypothermic newborns and to provide dosing guidance.

METHODS

Hypothermic newborns with perinatal asphyxia and treated with midazolam were included. Effectiveness was studied using continuous amplitude-integrated electroencephalography. Hemodynamic safety was assessed using pharmacokinetic-pharmacodynamic modeling with plasma samples and blood pressure recordings (mean arterial blood pressure) under hypothermia.

RESULTS

No effect of therapeutic hypothermia on pharmacokinetics could be identified. Add-on seizure control with midazolam was limited (23% seizure control). An inverse relationship between the midazolam plasma concentration and mean arterial blood pressure could be identified. At least one hypotensive episode was experienced in 64%. The concomitant use of inotropes decreased midazolam clearance by 33%.

CONCLUSIONS

Under therapeutic hypothermia, midazolam has limited add-on clinical anticonvulsant effectiveness after phenobarbital administration. Due to occurrence of hypotension requiring inotropic support, midazolam is less suitable as a second-line anticonvulsant drug under hypothermia.

Clinical pharmacology of midazolam in neonates and children: effect of disease-a review

Midazolam is a benzodiazepine with rapid onset of action and short duration of effect. In healthy neonates the half-life (t_1/2) and the clearance (Cl) are 3.3-fold longer and 3.7-fold smaller, respectively, than in adults. The volume of distribution (Vd) is 1.1 L/kg both in neonates and adults. Midazolam is hydroxylated by CYP3A4 and CYP3A5; the activities of these enzymes surge in the liver in the first weeks of life and thus the metabolic rate of midazolam is lower in neonates than in adults. Midazolam acts as a sedative, as an antiepileptic, for those infants who are refractory to standard antiepileptic therapy, and as an anaesthetic. Information of midazolam as an anaesthetic in infants are very little. Midazolam is usually administered intravenously; when minimal sedation is required, intranasal administration of midazolam is employed. Disease affects the pharmacokinetics of midazolam in neonates; multiple organ failure reduces the Cl of midazolam and mechanical ventilation prolongs the t_1/2 of this drug. ECMO therapy increases t_1/2, Cl, and Vd of midazolam several times. The adverse effects of midazolam in neonates are scarce: pain, tenderness, and thrombophlebitis may occur. Respiratory depression and hypotension appear in a limited percentage of infants following intravenous infusion of midazolam. In conclusion, midazolam is a safe and effective drug which is employed as a sedative, as antiepileptic agent, for infants who are refractory to standard antiepileptic therapy, and as an anaesthetic.

Intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

Proper sedation for neonates undergoing uncomfortable procedures may reduce stress and avoid complications. Midazolam is a short-acting benzodiazepine that is increasingly used in neonatal intensive care units (NICU). However, its effectiveness as a sedative in neonates has not been systematically evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether intravenous midazolam infusion is an effective sedative, as evaluated by behavioural or physiological measurements, or both, for critically ill neonates undergoing intensive care and to assess clinically significant short- and long-term adverse effects associated with its use.

SEARCH METHODS

We performed a literature search according to the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group search strategy. Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of intravenous midazolam use in neonates were identified by searching the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL, The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2012), MEDLINE (1985 to 2012), EMBASE (1980 to 2012), CINAHL (1981 to 2012), reference lists of published studies, personal files, and abstracts published in The Pediatric Academic Societies Meeting Abstract Archives from 1990 to 2011.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised controlled trials of intravenous midazolam infusion in infants aged 28 days or less for sedation were selected for review.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data regarding the primary outcome of level of sedation were abstracted. Secondary outcomes such as intraventricular haemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), death, length of NICU stay, and adverse effects associated with midazolam were assessed. When appropriate, meta-analyses were performed using risk ratio (RR), risk difference (RD), along with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for categorical variables and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous variables.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials were included in the review. Using different sedation scales, each study showed a statistically significantly higher sedation level in the midazolam group compared to the placebo group. However, since none of the sedation scales used have been validated in preterm infants, the effectiveness of midazolam in this population could not be ascertained. One study showed a statistically significant higher incidence of adverse neurological events (death, grade III or IV IVH, PVL), and meta-analysis of data from two studies showed a statistically significant longer duration of NICU stay in the midazolam group compared to the placebo group.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There are insufficient data to promote the use of intravenous midazolam infusion as a sedative for neonates undergoing intensive care. This review raises concerns about the safety of midazolam in neonates. Further research on the effectiveness and safety of midazolam in neonates is needed.

Haemodynamics of intravenous paracetamol in neonates

INTRODUCTION

Reports on the haemodynamics of intravenous (iv) paracetamol in adult intensive care were recently published. We therefore wanted to explore the haemodynamics of iv paracetamol in neonates.

METHODS

Retrospective, pooled analysis of heart rate (bpm) and blood pressure (mean, systolic, diastolic) observations collected during iv paracetamol pharmacokinetic studies in neonates. Heart rate and blood pressure were recorded just before and 30, 60, 120, 180, 240, 300 and 360 min after iv paracetamol (paired, ANOVA). Clinical characteristics in hypotensive (mean mmHg < gestational age, weeks) cases were compared with controls (Mann-Whitney U test).

RESULTS

Based on observations in 72 neonates, heart rate decreased from 145 (SD 20) to 138 (21), 141 (20), 137 (20), 137 (22), 140 (20), 139 (20) and 140 (21) bpm (paired p < 0.05, ANOVA p = 0.36). There were no changes in systolic and diastolic pressure, but mean arterial pressure decreased from 46 (7) to 43 (8) mmHg at 60 min (paired p < 0.05, ANOVA p = 0.75). Eight neonates developed hypotension. These patients had lower pre-administration arterial pressure (38 vs 47 mmHg, p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

In a setting of open label administration to alleviate (procedural) pain, haemodynamic effects of iv paracetamol in neonates remained modest. We suggest considering impaired haemodynamics to be a relative contra-indication for iv paracetamol in neonates.

Use of analgesic and sedative drugs in the NICU: integrating clinical trials and laboratory data

Recent advances in neonatal intensive care include and are partly attributable to growing attention for comfort and pain control in the term and preterm infant requiring intensive care.Limitation of painful procedures is certainly possible, but most critically ill infants require unavoidable painful or stressful procedures such as intubation, mechanical ventilation, or catheterization.Many analgesics (opioids and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs)and sedatives (benzodiazepines and other anesthetic agents) are available but their use varies considerably among units. This review summarizes current experimental knowledge on the effects of sedative and analgesic drugs on brain development and reviews clinical evidence that speaks for or against the use of common analgesic and sedative drugs in the NICU but avoids any discussion of anesthesia during surgery. Risk/benefit ratios of intermittent boluses or continuous infusions for the commonly used sedative and analgesic agents are discussed in the light of clinical and experimental studies. The limitations of extrapolating experimental results from animals to humans must be considered while making practical recommendations based on the currently available evidence.

Challenges for drug studies in children: CYP3A phenotyping as example

A paucity of data exists on the disposition and effect of drugs in young children. This information gap can be reduced by elucidating developmental principles of absorption, distribution, metabolism and excretion (ADME) in vivo. Such knowledge might enable the prediction of the disposition of individual drugs in children over the whole pediatric age range. CYP3A, the most abundant human drug metabolizing enzyme, is involved in the metabolism of more than 50% of all marketed drugs. Hence, elucidating the developmental pattern of CYP3A in relation to genetic background, disease and comedications might greatly enhance our knowledge on drug disposition in children. Several methods have been used to determine in vivo CYP3A activity in human adults, while similar studies in children face several ethical, practical and scientific challenges. The aim of this review is to identify these challenges and offer feasible solutions for studying drugs in young children, with an emphasis on CYP3A phenotyping as an example.

Do ventilated neonates require pain management?

Mechanical ventilation is a stressful experience in neonates resulting in changes in neuroendocrine parameters, pain scores, and physiologic responses. Assisted ventilation in neonates is presumed to be associated with chronic repetitive pain, which in turn is associated with adverse long-term sequelae. Reasons to routinely sedate ventilated neonates include improved ventilator synchrony, improved pulmonary function, and decreased neuroendocrine responses, including cortisol, beta-endorphine, and catecholamines. Reasons not to treat include the well-known adverse side effects of pain medication, especially the opiates, including hypotension from morphine, chest wall rigidity from fentanyl, and tolerance, dependence, and withdrawal from both opiates and benzodiazepines. Additionally, adverse effects such as death and IVH are not improved with preemptive treatment. Chronic pain assessment is poorly validated and difficult to assess in this population, and most studies have evaluated only acute pain scores. If patients are treated, opiates are the most common class of drugs, with morphine the most well studied. Fentanyl may be advantageous in hypotensive, younger neonates because it has fewer cardiovascular effects. The benzodiazepines, midazolam and lorazepam, have been used in ventilated neonates, but midazolam has been associated with adverse effects in one small study so concern remains regarding its use. Significant gaps in our knowledge exist, especially in regard to long-term effects of treatment, or lack thereof, and in the assessment of the chronic pain associated with assisted ventilation.

Effects of Midazolam and Morphine on Cerebral Oxygenation and Hemodynamics in Ventilated Premature Infants

BACKGROUND

Midazolam sedation and morphine analgesia are commonly used in ventilated premature infants.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effects of midazolam versus morphine infusion on cerebral oxygenation and hemodynamics in ventilated premature infants.

METHODS

11 patients (GA 26.6-33.0 weeks, BW 780-2,335 g) were sedated with midazolam (loading dose 0.2 mg/kg, maintenance 0.2 mg/kg/h) and 10 patients (GA 26.4-33.3 weeks, BW 842-1,955 g) were sedated with morphine (loading dose 0.05 mg/kg, maintenance 0.01 mg/kg/h). Changes in oxyhemoglobin (Delta cO2Hb) and deoxyhemoglobin (Delta cHHb) were assessed using near infrared spectrophotometry. Changes in cHbD (= Delta cO(2)Hb - Delta cHHb) reflect changes in cerebral blood oxygenation and changes in concentration of total hemoglobin (Delta ctHb = Delta cO2Hb + Delta cHHb) represent changes in cerebral blood volume (DeltaCBV). Changes in cerebral blood flow velocity (DeltaCBFV) were intermittently measured using Doppler ultrasound. Heart rate (HR), mean arterial blood pressure (MABP), arterial oxygen saturation (saO2) and transcutaneous measured pO2 (tcpO2) and pCO2 (tcpCO2) were continuously registered. Statistical analyses were carried out using linear mixed models to account for the longitudinal character study design.

RESULTS

Within 15 min after the loading dose of midazolam, a decrease in saO2, tcpO2 and cHbD was observed in 5/11 infants. In addition, a fall in MABP and CBFV was observed 15 min after midazolam administration. Immediately after morphine infusion a decrease in saO2, tcpO2 and cHbD was observed in 6/10 infants. Furthermore, morphine infusion resulted in a persistent increase in CBV.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of midazolam and morphine in ventilated premature infants causes significant changes in cerebral oxygenation and hemodynamics, which might be harmful.

Pain control: opioid dosing, population kinetics and side-effects

Neonates undergoing invasive procedures, postoperative pain or ventilatory support commonly receive opioids for treating pain and stress. Randomized clinical trials have examined the benefits and adverse effects of morphine or fentanyl for ventilated neonates and other indications. This paper summarizes the current evidence for opioid dosing in newborns, reviews their side-effects and explains the use of population kinetics and non-linear mixed-effects modeling to analyze the data from clinical trials. Opioid use should be reserved for severe pain postoperatively or during intensive care in neonates, using continuous infusions rather than intermittent boluses. The safety and efficacy data from prolonged opioid use, particularly on the long-term outcomes of neonates, is still lacking. The pharmacodynamics and pharmacogenetics of opioid use in infancy needs further investigation, using non-linear mixed-effects models to drive individualized therapy. The current interest in opioid research will reap rich dividends in providing pain relief for neonates and avoiding dangerous side effects.

Analgesia and local anesthesia during invasive procedures in the neonate

BACKGROUND

Preterm and full-term neonates admitted to the neonatal intensive care unit or elsewhere in the hospital are routinely subjected to invasive procedures that can cause acute pain. Despite published data on the complex behavioral, physiologic, and biochemical responses of these neonates and the detrimental short- and long-term clinical outcomes of exposure to repetitive pain, clinical use of pain-control measures in neonates undergoing invasive procedures remains sporadic and suboptimal. As part of the Newborn Drug Development Initiative, the US Food and Drug Administration and the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development invited a group of international experts to form the Neonatal Pain Control Group to review the therapeutic options for pain management associated with the most commonly performed invasive procedures in neonates and to identify research priorities in this area.

OBJECTIVE

The goal of this article was to review and synthesize the published clinical evidence for the management of pain caused by invasive procedures in preterm and full-term neonates.

METHODS

Clinical studies examining various therapies for procedural pain in neonates were identified by searches of MEDLINE (1980-2004), the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 1, 2004), the reference lists of review articles, and personal files. The search terms included specific drug names, infant-newborn, infant-preterm, and pain, using the explode function for each key word. The English-language literature was reviewed, and case reports and small case series were discarded.

RESULTS

The most commonly performed invasive procedures in neonates included heel lancing, venipuncture, IV or arterial cannulation, chest tube placement, tracheal intubation or suctioning, lumbar puncture, circumcision, and SC or IM injection. Various drug classes were examined critically, including opioid analgesics, sedative/hypnotic drugs, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and acetaminophen, injectable and topical local anesthetics, and sucrose. Research considerations related to each drug category were identified, potential obstacles to the systematic study of these drugs were discussed, and current gaps in knowledge were enumerated to define future research needs. Discussions relating to the optimal design for and ethical constraints on the study of neonatal pain will be published separately. Well-designed clinical trials investigating currently available and new therapies for acute pain in neonates will provide the scientific framework for effective pain management in neonates undergoing invasive procedures.

Minimum effective dose of midazolam for sedation of mechanically ventilated neonates

OBJECTIVE

To determine the minimal effective dose (MED) of intravenous midazolam, required for appropriate sedation in 95% of patients, 1 h after drug administration.

METHODS

A double-blind dose-finding study using the continual reassessment method, a Bayesian sequential design. Twenty-three newborn infants hospitalized in intensive care unit participated. Inclusion criteria were: (i) post-natal age <28 days, (ii) gestational age >33 weeks, (iii) intubation and ventilatory support required for respiratory distress syndrome, (iv) need for sedation (i.e. one of the six following criteria: agitation or grimacing or crying facial expression before tracheal suctioning, agitation or grimacing or crying facial expression during tracheal suctioning). Each neonate was allocated to a loading dose, ranging from 75 to 200 microg/kg, and a maintenance dose ranging from 37.5 to 100 microg/kg/h.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint was the level of sedation 1 h after the onset of infusion. The sedation procedure was classified as a success if all the following clinical criteria were met: no agitation, no grimacing and no crying facial expression before as well as during tracheal suctioning. Based on the 23 patients, the final estimated probability of success was 76.9% (95% credibility interval: 56.6-91.4%) for the 200 microg/kg loading dose. no significant adverse effect was observed.

CONCLUSIONS

Continual reassessment is a new approach, suitable for dose-finding study in neonates. this method overcomes some of the ethical, statistical and practical problems associated with this population. Using this method, the MED was estimated to be the 200 mug/kg loading dose of midazolam.

Premedication for tracheal intubation: A prospective survey in 75 neonatal and pediatric intensive care units*

OBJECTIVE

In children, like in adults, tracheal intubation is a painful procedure that may induce hypertension, tachycardia, and other undesirable hemodynamic disorders. Although premature neonates are very sensitive to pain and vulnerable to its long-term effects, the need for sedation before tracheal intubation is still discussed in neonatal units. Our objective was to investigate the practice of premedication before tracheal intubation in neonatal and pediatric units and determine the influence of premedication on intubating conditions.

DESIGN

We performed a 10-day prospective survey in 75 neonatal and pediatric intensive care units among the 98 licensed in France. A questionnaire was completed for each intubation performed in each surveyed unit.

SUBJECTS

A total of 204 patients were studied: 140 neonates, 52 infants, and 12 children.

MAIN RESULTS

Data on 204 tracheal intubations were collected from 223 that were performed during the study period (participation rate, 91.4%). Premedication was used before intubation for 37.1%, 67.3%, and 91.7% of neonates, infants, and children, respectively (p <.0001). In the subgroup of neonates, premedication was particularly rare for the youngest and the smallest infants. Midazolam was the principle hypnotic used in neonates, whereas propofol was mainly used in children. Opioids or muscle relaxants were used in 16.2% and 4.4% of the patients, respectively. A low success rate and a high incidence of hypoxemia and bradycardia were correlated with the inexperience of the operator. Premedication did not significantly influence either the success rate or the undesirable events associated with tracheal intubation.

CONCLUSION

Use of premedication before tracheal intubation is limited in neonates and increases according to the age of the patient. Midazolam does not seem to be an accurate choice to improve intubating conditions in neonates and infants. Because tracheal intubation is a technique that requires a skill only developed by regular practice, operators who have limited experience with intubating children should be supported by senior operators.

Intravenous midazolam infusion for sedation of infants in the neonatal intensive care unit

BACKGROUND

The need for sedation for neonates undergoing uncomfortable procedures in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) has often been overlooked. Proper sedation may reduce stress and avoid complications during procedures such as mechanical ventilation. Midazolam is a short acting benzodiazepine that has been increasingly used in the NICU. However, the effectiveness of intravenous midazolam as a sedative in neonates has not been systematically evaluated.

OBJECTIVES

To determine whether intravenous midazolam infusion is an effective sedative, as evaluated by behavioural and/or physiologic measurements, for critically ill neonates undergoing intensive care, and to assess clinically significant short and long term adverse effects associated with its use.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Literature search according to the Cochrane Neonatal Review Group search strategy. Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of intravenous midazolam use in neonates were identified by searching the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (The Cochrane Library, Issue 3, 2002), MEDLINE (1985-2002), EMBASE (1980-2002), reference lists of published studies, personal files, and abstracts published in Pediatric Research from 1990-2002.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials of intravenous midazolam infusion in infants </= 28 days of age for sedation during mechanical ventilation or radiologic investigations were selected for review. Studies on midazolam use as an anesthetic or an anticonvulsant were excluded. Studies involving neonates and older infants and children were excluded if data for neonates could not be extracted.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Data regarding the primary outcome of level of sedation (as evaluated by behavioural scales or physiologic parameters) were abstracted. Secondary outcomes including intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH), periventricular leukomalacia (PVL), death within 28 days of age, adverse effects associated with midazolam (hemodynamic and neurologic), days of ventilation, days of supplemental oxygen use, pneumothorax, length of NICU stay, and long term neurodevelopmental outcome were assessed. When appropriate, meta-analyses were performed using relative risk (RR), risk difference (RD), along with their 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) for categorical variables and weighted mean difference (WMD) for continuous variables.

MAIN RESULTS

Three trials were eligible for inclusion in the review. Data on level of sedation from the three trials could not be combined for meta-analysis because of differences in tools used to measure sedation levels. Two studies (Jacqz-Aigrain 1994, Arya 2001) showed a statistically significantly higher level of sedation in the midazolam group compared to the placebo group. The third study (Anand 1999) comparing midazolam to morphine and placebo found no statistically significant difference in sedation level among the three groups, but a statistically significantly higher level of sedation was found in the midazolam group compared with the placebo group during the treatment infusion. However, since the sedation scales used in all three studies have not been validated in preterm infants, the effectiveness of midazolam as a sedative in this population could not be ascertained. In the study by Jacqz-Aigrain et al (Jacqz-Aigrain 1994), blood pressure was statistically significantly lower in the midazolam group than in the placebo group on days one and two, although there was no statistically significant difference in the incidence of hypotension requiring albumin or vasoactive drugs between groups. The study by Anand et al (Anand 1999) showed a statistically significant higher incidence of adverse neurologic events (death, grade III-IV IVH, PVL) in the midazolam group compared with the other groups. In addition, meta-analysis of available data from two studies (Jacqz-Aigrain 1994, Anand 1999) showed a statistically significantly longer duration of NICU stay in the midazolam group compared to the placebo group (WMD 5.4 days, 95%CI 0.4, 10.5). Meta-analyses of other secondary outcomes showed no statistically significant differences between the midazolam and placebo groups.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

There are insufficient data to promote the use of intravenous midazolam infusion as a sedative for neonates undergoing intensive care. This review raises concerns about the safety of midazolam in neonates. Further research on the effectiveness and safety of midazolam in neonates is needed.

Safety of benzodiazepines in newborns

BACKGROUND

Benzodiazepines are being used in neonatal intensive care units for sedation and control of seizures. However, anecdotal reports suggest that their use in infants may be associated with serious adverse effects (AEs).

OBJECTIVE

To determine the incidence of AEs from benzodiazepine use in preterm and full-term infants.

METHODS

Retrospective chart review of 63 infants who received benzodiazepines as a sedative or anticonvulsant over a 16-month period.

RESULTS

Mean +/- SD gestational age of the infants was 33.1 +/- 6.2 weeks, and birth weight was 2.3 +/- 1.2 kg. Median (range) postnatal age at commencement of drug administration was 19 (5-54) days. Forty-one infants received lorazepam, 8 received midazolam, and 14 received both. Ten (16%) of the infants had 14 documented adverse events: seizures (n = 6), hypotension (n = 5), and respiratory depression (n = 3). Using a validated adverse drug reaction probability scale, a probable association with benzodiazepine use was demonstrated in 12 of the AEs. Due to the retrospective nature of the data, a score for definite association was not attainable. Anticonvulsant administration was required for 4 of 6 infants and, in all cases of respiratory depression, ventilatory support was initiated or increased. Two cases of significant hypotension were treated with inotropes. There was no statistically significant correlation between AEs and benzodiazepine dose or concomitant use of inotropes or analgesics (morphine), although most infants had underlying medical conditions or received multiple drugs that may have predisposed them to experience AEs.

CONCLUSIONS

Administration of benzodiazepines was frequently associated with AEs in full-term and preterm infants. It is possible that underlying illnesses and concomitant drug use predisposed these effects. Until the benefit-to-risk ratio is determined by further studies, judicious use of benzodiazepines is recommended in this vulnerable population.

[Sedation induced by midazolam in intensive care: pharmacologic and pharmacokinetic aspects]

OBJECTIVE

Review on midazolam in order to optimize drug utilisation and therapeutic monitoring.

DATA SOURCES

Research of English or French articles published until August 2001, using Medline database. The key words were: midazolam, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamic, sedation, drug interaction.

STUDY SELECTION

Original articles, clinical cases and letters to the Editor were selected. Animal studies were excluded.

DATA EXTRACTION

The articles were analysed according to their interest in midazolam clinical practice.

DATA SYNTHESIS

Midazolam is a benzodiazepine widely used in intensive care unit, as a sedative, anxiety-relieving, and amnesic drug. Midazolam could be used in patients with cardiac, or respiratory failure, and in neurosurgery. A great interindividual variability on pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic response was observed. In intensive care patients, elimination half-life is known to be widely increased. Midazolam is metabolised by hepatic microsomes. The major metabolite is the 1-hydroxymidazolam, which is pharmacologically active. A prolonged sedation due to an accumulation of conjugated metabolite was observed in renal failure patients. Enzymatic inductors or inhibitors could influence pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamic effects of midazolam.

CONCLUSION

According to midazolam pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variability, an individual dosage adjustment is essential for long-term sedation. Target controlled sedation could be a mean to limit the variability and to reach quickly the pharmacodynamic effect.

Flumazenil's Reversal of Myoclonic-like Movements Associated with Midazolam in Term Newborns

Sedation is an important aspect of care for critically ill newborns. Proper sedation reduces stress during procedures such as mechanical ventilation. Midazolam, a short-acting benzodiazepine, is widely administered as a sedative in newborn intensive care units but is not without side effects. Three term newborns developed myoclonic-like abnormal movements after receiving midazolam. In one, flumazenil controlled the abnormal movements. Flumazenil is a potent benzodiazepine antagonist that competitively blocks the central effects of benzodiazepines. It can reverse the sedative effects of benzodiazepines occurring after diagnostic or therapeutic procedures or after benzodiazepine overdose. Flumazenil may be considered in cases of abnormal movements associated with midazolam. However, further studies are needed to provide guidelines for the administration of this drug in newborns.

Intranasal midazolam for prolonged convulsive seizures

In order to determine the efficiency of intranasal midazolam in prolonged convulsive episodes, we conducted a prospective study in children with various types of seizures. Nine patients (six boys, three girls; age range 6 months to 9 years) with prolonged convulsions lasting more than 10 min were treated with intranasal midazolam, 0.3 mg/kg. The success rate was 100% with only one case requiring a second dose. Estimated duration of seizures was 12-30 min (mean 18.6) while mean time elapsed until cessation of seizures was 139.6 s (range 60-480). No significant adverse effects were noted except for one patient who had seizures secondary to serious CNS infection and respiratory depression after intranasal midazolam.

Changes in cerebral venous prostanoids during midazolam-induced cerebrovascular hypotension in newborn piglets

OBJECTIVES

We hypothesized that the effects of midazolam are associated with altered prostanoid synthesis in the newborn piglet during continuous infusion. To test this hypothesis, we examined the effect of midazolam on prostanoid production in the carotid artery and sagittal sinus vein before and during midazolam infusion.

DESIGN

Prospective, randomized, controlled, experimental study.

SETTING

Research laboratory at Long Beach Memorial Medical Center.

SUBJECTS

Fourteen newborn piglets (1-3 days old, 1-1.5 kg) randomly assigned to receive either midazolam or vehicle (5% dextrose) infusion for 6 hrs.

INTERVENTIONS

Two groups of animals received either a) a loading dose of 300 microg/kg of midazolam over 15 mins, followed by a continuous intravenous infusion of 100 microg/kg/hr (n = 6), or b) equivalent volume bolus and intravenous infusions of 5% dextrose (control, n = 8).

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Changes in systemic and cerebral venous hemodynamics, blood gases, and prostanoid (prostaglandin E2, 6-ketoprostaglandin F1 alpha, thromboxane B2) production were measured at baseline, postbolus, and at 0.5, 2, 4, and 6 hrs. Systemic and cerebral venous midazolam concentrations were measured at 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, and 6 hrs. Midazolam infusion did not affect systemic hemodynamics or blood gases. In contrast, midazolam infusion significantly reduced sagittal sinus vein blood pressure, PO2, oxygen saturation, and oxygen content. Cerebral fractional oxygen extraction increased and was positively correlated with cerebral fractional midazolam extraction. Concurrently, systemic and sagittal sinus vein plasma prostaglandin E2 concentrations decreased, whereas 6-ketoprostaglandin F1 alpha concentrations increased with midazolam infusion. Thromboxane B2 concentrations increased transiently in the systemic plasma.

CONCLUSIONS

Midazolam infusion preceded by a high bolus dose in newborn piglets alters systemic and sagittal sinus vein prostanoid production. It is also associated with changes in sagittal sinus vein blood pressure and cerebral fractional oxygen extraction. These changes may reflect decreased brain perfusion and metabolism during midazolam infusion.

Prevention and management of pain and stress in the neonate

This statement is intended for health care professionals caring for neonates (preterm to one month of age). The objectives of this statement are to: increase awareness that neonates experience pain; provide a physiological basis for neonatal pain and stress assessment and management by health care professionals; make recommendations for reduced exposure of the neonate to noxious stimuli and to minimize associated adverse outcomes; and recommend effective and safe interventions that relieve pain and stress.

Use of midazolam for refractory status epilepticus in pediatric patients

Status epilepticus is more common among children than young adults. Children might be less likely to die and might be resistant to permanent neurologic damage due to status epilepticus, but significant sequelae also have been demonstrated. Aggressive intervention and rapid termination of seizures contribute significantly to better prognosis and reduced mortality from status epilepticus. Initial treatment of status epilepticus typically consists of either diazepam or lorazepam, immediately followed by phenytoin or phenobarbital. However, approximately 100% to 15% of status epilepticus episodes are refractory to these conventional therapies. Traditionally, refractory status epilepticus is treated with barbiturate coma or general anesthetics, both of which require invasive cardiorespiratory and hemodynamic monitoring and are associated with significant complications. Midazolam is a water-soluble benzodiazepine with a fast onset of action, a short half-life, and inactive metabolites that has been very effective in terminating seizures refractory to diazepam, lorazepam, phenytoin, and phenobarbital in pediatric patients. Midazolam is a valuable treatment option for refractory status epilepticus, especially in pediatric patients.

Sedation with intravenous midazolam in the pediatric intensive care unit

Physical and emotional distress can have important effects on patients in the pediatric intensive care unit (ICU). Intravenous (IV) infusion of benzodiazepines is an important adjunct to assisted ventilation and other potentially distressing ICU procedures. Combined with intermittent or continuous infusion of opioids, the benzodiazepines provide smooth control of anxiety, pain, and agitation. Intravenous midazolam (Versed Roche Laboratories) is distinguished from diazepam (Valium, Roche Products) by its water solubility, short elimination half-life, and generally short duration of action. These pharmacological properties, which are also shared, in part, with the more slowly eliminated drug lorazepam (Ativan, Wyeth-Ayerst), facilitate titration of the rate of infusion against patient response and permit regulation of the depth of sedation. The major adverse effects of long-term benzodiazepine infusion are withdrawal symptoms and, occasionally, delayed awakening. The dosage needed to initiate and maintain sedation must be adjusted to body weight, degree of sedation desired, and concomitant medications, as well as to underlying health and cardiovascular status. Benzodiazepines, such as midazolam and lorazepam, represent important choices among drugs used for sedation in the pediatric ICU.

Haemodynamic responses and population pharmacokinetics of midazolam following administration to ventilated, preterm neonates

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of intravenous midazolam on haemodynamic variables and cerebral blood flow velocity (CBFV) and to determine the pharmacokinetics using a population approach in very low birthweight (VLBW) ventilated infants.

METHODOLOGY

Physiological variables were measured at predetermined times in 10 infants with birthweight < or = 1500 g following a bolus dose of intravenous midazolam (0.1 mg/kg). Heart rate, mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and transcutaneous CO2 (TcPCO2) were recorded and CBFV was assessed by Doppler ultrasound. Midazolam concentrations were also measured and pharmacokinetic parameters determined using a population modelling package.

RESULTS

No change in heart rate occurred during the study period, while the MAP decreased by 3 mmHg 5 min after midazolam administration compared to baseline values. A non-significant fall in TcPCO2 was seen at 20 min. Mean CBFV decreased from the baseline by 12% at 5 min, then returning to predose values. Midazolam concentrations were in the range shown to be effective in sedation of paediatric intensive care infants with the elimination being delayed in comparison to older children.

CONCLUSIONS

As only minor cerebral and haemodynamic effects were found with the use of midazolam in stable ventilated preterm infants, it appears to be a safe, short-term sedative agent.

Use of methohexital for elective intubation in neonates

The effectiveness and safety of a short acting barbiturate, methohexital, was assessed for its use at the time of elective intubation in 18 newborn infants with severe respiratory or cardiac conditions. Evaluation included the speed of action and the degree of relaxation, sedation, and sleep in the first five minutes after administration. All newborn infants were intubated in a fully relaxed and somnolent state. In most infants recovery was completed within five minutes. A slight to moderate oxygen saturation drop was observed during the period of intubation, especially in patients with cyanotic heart disease. The side effects of the drug were twitching and a slight drop in blood pressure. In conclusion, methohexital seems to be a useful drug for short term anaesthesia in neonates, during which, short procedures like elective intubation can be safely performed.

[Use of intravenous midazolam in status epilepticus in children]

BACKGROUND

Status epilepticus is usually treated by benzodiazepines such as diazepam or clonazepam in association with phenytoin and phenobarbital. Midazolam (MDZ) is a recently developed short-elimination half-life benzodiazepine.

CASE REPORTS

Four children, aged 3 days to 4 years, were hospitalized in the pediatric intensive care unit for life-threatening illness and developed status epilepticus. They were given an i.v. bolus dose of 300 to 500 micrograms/kg of MDZ immediately followed by a continuous i.v. infusion at the dose of 100 to 300 micrograms/kg/h. All seizures stopped within 1 hour after the bolus dose administration. No acute adverse events of MDZ were noted. Withdrawal symptoms in one patient were controlled by progressive reduction of MDZ doses. Neurologic sequelae were noted in three children, secondary to their primitive illness.

CONCLUSIONS

High doses of MDZ are effective for treating refractory status epilepticus; optimal dosage and duration of treatment remains to be determined.

The effect of supplemental dietary fat on plasma cholesterol levels in lovastatin-treated hypercholesterolemic patients

STUDY OBJECTIVE

A validation study was conducted first to test assumptions about the effect of saturated and unsaturated dietary fat supplements. The second study was conducted to determine the effect on blood cholesterol levels of saturated and unsaturated fat supplements in patients who followed a low-fat diet and were administered lovastatin.

DESIGN

Randomized, crossover design, with three periods in the first study and four in the second study, each lasting 6 weeks.

SETTING

Cholesterol Research Center.

PATIENTS

The first study evaluated adults with total cholesterol levels between 200 and 280 mg/dl (5.172 and 7.241 mmol/L). The second study included adults with low-density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol levels above 160 mg/dl (4.138 mmol/L).

INTERVENTIONS

Fat supplements with either coconut or canola oil were delivered to patients in oatmeal-raisin cookies.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

In the validation study, patients' mean prerandomization total cholesterol level of 222 mg/dl was reduced to 213 mg/dl with canola oil and increased to 233 mg/dl with coconut oil cookies (p = 0.0038). In the second study the mean prerandomization total cholesterol level of 214 mg/dl was decreased to 199 mg/dl with canola oil and to 208 mg/dl with coconut oil cookies (p = 0.2342). The LDL cholesterol levels changed in a similar fashion in both studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Changes in total and LDL cholesterol levels in the validation study were expected based on established effects of saturated and unsaturated fatty acids, but changes in these levels in lovastatin-cookie study were not expected. They could have occurred because lovastatin reversed the effect of saturated fats and enhanced the effect of unsaturated fats. Alternatively, they may have been due to enhanced bioavailability of lovastatin when administered with a high-fat diet. These findings must be confirmed.

Severe withdrawal syndrome possibly associated with cessation of a midazolam and fentanyl infusion

A 40-month-old child was sedated with a fentanyl and midazolam infusion for 7 days. After the drugs were discontinued he became unresponsive and globally aphasic, and had marked thrombocytosis. He was hospitalized for 4 weeks, during which time his motor and cognitive status slowly improved, and had almost returned to baseline at time of discharge. Severe neurologic abnormalities have been reported with midazolam and fentanyl, administered separately or together, and seem to be a consequence of a withdrawal syndrome. Of interest, this patient had a reactive thrombocytosis at the time of onset of the withdrawal syndrome, and his decreased platelet count coincided with the return to normal cognitive and motor status. Based on this experience and other reports, we believe midazolam-fentanyl combination should be administered with caution.

Placebo-controlled trial of midazolam sedation in mechanically ventilated newborn babies

Although midazolam is used for sedation of mechanically ventilated newborn babies, this treatment has not been evaluated in a randomised trial. We have done a prospective placebo-controlled study of the effects of midazolam on haemodynamic variables and sedation as judged by a five-item behaviour score. 46 newborn babies on mechanical ventilation for respiratory distress syndrome were randomly assigned to receive midazolam (n = 24) or placebo (n = 22) as a continuous infusion. Doses of midazolam were calculated to obtain plasma concentrations between 200 and 1000 ng/mL within 24 h of starting treatment and to maintain these values throughout the study. Haemodynamic and ventilatory variables were noted every hour, as were complications and possible side-effects of treatment. Mean (SD) duration of inclusion was 78.7 (30.9) h. 1 patient in the treatment group and 7 in the placebo group were withdrawn because of inadequate sedation (p < 0.05). Midazolam gave a significantly better sedative effect than placebo, as estimated by the behaviour score (p < 0.05). Heart rate and blood pressure were reduced by treatment but remained within the normal range for gestational age and there was no effect on ventilatory indices. The incidence of complications was similar in the two groups. No midazolam-related side-effects were noted. Continuous infusion of midazolam at doses adapted to gestational age induces effective sedation in newborn babies on mechanical ventilation, with positive effects on haemodynamic variables. The course of the respiratory distress syndrome was not influenced by this treatment. Midazolam was given over only a few days and the limited effects on heart rate and blood pressure that we report should not encourage long-term administration.

Sedation in Neonatal and Pediatric Intensive Care

Despite the widespread use of potent sedative and analgesic agents in adult patients, it is remarkable that systemic analgesia and sedation have not been administered routinely to neonates and children until very recently. Adequate sedation and analgesia have historically been withheld from these patients because of the mistaken beliefs that pain perception was not fully developed and that these patients were much more prone to adverse effects of the most commonly used agents. There is now overwhelming evidence that pain perception and physiologic responses to stress are present in neonates of all gestational ages and a variety of effective sedative/analgesic agents have recently been added to the therapeutic armamentarium. We will outline the classes of agents currently available, briefly describe mechanisms of action and the relevant pharmacokinetic—pharmacodynamic parameters, summarize the short-term and long-term side effects following prolonged administration of these agents, and highlight practical considerations for the most commonly used sedative-analgesic medications.

Pharmacokinetics of midazolam during continuous infusion in critically ill neonates

Midazolam is a water soluble benzodiazepine, with a short elimination half-life in adults and children. An IV bolus (0.2 mg.kg-1) immediately followed by continuous infusion of 0.06 mg.kg-1.h-1 was administered to 15 critically ill neonates at a gestational age of 32.8 weeks, who required sedation for mechanical ventilation. Heart rate and blood pressure were closely monitored. Hypotension occurred in 4 patients after the bolus dose or during the continuous infusion. Three of them had also been given fentanyl. Individual pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated: plasma clearance was 3.9 ml.min-1, elimination half-life was 12.0 h. Because of its short half-life compared to diazepam, midazolam may be used during the neonatal period to achieve rapid, brief sedation. However, it should be administered cautiously to neonates, particularly in premature infants, or if fentanyl is also given.