Are there any differences between bipolar and unipolar melancholia?

Psychotic symptoms in bipolar disorder and their impact on the illness: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Lifetime psychotic symptoms are present in over half of the patients with bipolar disorder (BD) and can have an adverse effect on its course, outcome, and treatment. However, despite a considerable amount of research, the impact of psychotic symptoms on BD remains unclear, and there are very few systematic reviews on the subject.

AIM

To examine the extent of psychotic symptoms in BD and their impact on several aspects of the illness.

METHODS

The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses guidelines were followed. An electronic literature search of six English-language databases and a manual search was undertaken to identify published articles on psychotic symptoms in BD from January 1940 to December 2021. Combinations of the relevant Medical Subject Headings terms were used to search for these studies. Articles were selected after a screening phase, followed by a review of the full texts of the articles. Assessment of the methodological quality of the studies and the risk of bias was conducted using standard tools.

RESULTS

This systematic review included 339 studies of patients with BD. Lifetime psychosis was found in more than a half to two-thirds of the patients, while current psychosis was found in a little less than half of them. Delusions were more common than hallucinations in all phases of BD. About a third of the patients reported first-rank symptoms or mood-incongruent psychotic symptoms, particularly during manic episodes. Psychotic symptoms were more frequent in bipolar type I compared to bipolar type II disorder and in mania or mixed episodes compared to bipolar depression. Although psychotic symptoms were not more severe in BD, the severity of the illness in psychotic BD was consistently greater. Psychosis was usually associated with poor insight and a higher frequency of agitation, anxiety, and hostility but not with psychiatric comorbidity. Psychosis was consistently linked with increased rates and the duration of hospitalizations, switching among patients with depression, and poorer outcomes with mood-incongruent symptoms. In contrast, psychosis was less likely to be accompanied by a rapid-cycling course, longer illness duration, and heightened suicidal risk. There was no significant impact of psychosis on the other parameters of course and outcome.

CONCLUSION

Though psychotic symptoms are very common in BD, they are not always associated with an adverse impact on BD and its course and outcome.

A comparison of symptoms of bipolar and unipolar depression in postpartum women

BACKGROUND

Distinguishing postpartum women with bipolar from unipolar depression remains challenging, particularly in obstetrical and primary care settings. The post-birth period carries the highest lifetime risk for the onset or recurrence of Bipolar Disorder (BD). Characterization of differences between unipolar and bipolar depression symptom presentation and severity is critical to differentiate the two disorders.

METHODS

We performed a secondary analysis of a study of 10,000 women screened by phone with the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale at 4-6 weeks post-birth. Screen-positive mothers completed the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-4 and those diagnosed with BD and unipolar Major Depressive Disorder (UD) were included. Depressive symptoms were assessed with the 29-item Structured Interview Guide for the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (SIGH-ADS).

RESULTS

The sample consisted of 728 women with UD and 272 women with BD. Women with BD had significantly elevated levels of depression severity due to the higher scores on 8 of the 29 SIGH-ADS symptoms. Compared to UD, women with BD had significantly higher rates of comorbid anxiety disorders and were twice as likely to report sexual and/or physical abuse.

LIMITATIONS

Only women who screened positive for depression were included in this analysis. Postpartum women with unstable living situations, who were hospitalized or did not respond to contact attempts did not contribute data.

CONCLUSIONS

Severity of specific symptom constellations may be a useful guide for interviewing postpartum depressed women along with the presence of anxiety disorder comorbidity and physical and/or sexual abuse.

Hypomania in clinical practice

Recent work suggests that a broad clinical spectrum of bipolar disorder is more common than previously thought and that the disorder may affect up to 5% of the population. The correct definition and diagnosis of hypomania is central to the identification of bipolar disorder. In this review we focus on recent diagnostic and clinical advances relating to bipolar disorder, with particular reference to hypomanic states. We also highlight some of the controversies in this field and discuss ways in which clinicians might improve their detection of bipolar disorders.

Does stress play a significant role in bipolar disorder? A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

There is evidence that stressful life events (LE) play a crucial role in the etiology of bipolar affective disorder (BD). However, primary studies, as well as narrative reviews, have provided mixed results. The present meta-analysis combined and analyzed previous data in order to address these inconsistencies.

METHOD

Forty-two studies published in 53 records were identified by systematically searching MEDLINE, PsychINFO, and PSYCHINDEX using the terms "bipolar disorder" OR "manic-depressive" OR "bipolar affective disorder" OR "mania" AND "stress" OR "life event" OR "daily hassles" OR "goal attainment". Then, meta-analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Individuals diagnosed with BD reported more LE before relapse when compared to euthymic phases. They also experienced more LE relative to healthy individuals and to physically ill patients. No significant difference in the number of LE was found when BD was compared to unipolar depression and schizophrenia.

LIMITATIONS

When interpreting the present meta-analytic findings one should keep in mind that most included studies were retrospective and often did not specify relevant information, e.g., if the LE were chronic or acute or if the individuals were diagnosed with BD I or II. We could not entirely rule out a publication bias.

CONCLUSION

The present meta-analyses found that individuals with BD were sensitive to LE, which corroborates recent theoretical models and psychosocial treatment approaches of BD. Childbirth, as a specific LE, affected individuals with BD more than individuals with unipolar depression. Future studies that investigate specific LE are warranted.

The properties and utility of the CORE measure of melancholia

BACKGROUND

The CORE measure was designed to assess a central feature of melancholia - signs of psychomotor disturbance (PMD) - and so provide an alternate non-symptom based measure of melancholia or of its probability. This review evaluates development and application studies undertaken over the last 25 years to consider how well it has met its original objectives.

METHODS

All studies published using the CORE measure as either the only or an adjunctive measure of melancholia were obtained and are considered in this review.

RESULTS

Findings suggest high reliability in quantifying CORE scores can be achieved and that it has construct validity as a measure of PMD. A number of application studies assessing socio-demographic factors, cognitive and motor impairment, dexamethasone suppression and thyrotropin-releasing hormone, response to psychotherapy and to electroconvulsive therapy support its validity as a measure of melancholia, while functional brain imaging studies suggest that the measure identifies regions of decreased connectivity.

LIMITATIONS

Use of the CORE benefits from rater training and for subjects to be assessed at or near nadir of their depressive episode. There have been insufficient studies evaluating genetic factors, and the treatment response of CORE-defined melancholic patients to antidepressant drugs of differing classes.

CONCLUSIONS

The CORE, either as a proxy or direct measure of melancholia, provides a strategy for assigning depressed subjects a diagnosis or melancholic or non-melancholic depression or for estimating the probability of melancholia.

Diagnostic Conversion to Bipolar Disorder in Unipolar Depressed Patients Participating in Trials on Antidepressants

Objective

In unipolar depressed patients participating in trials on antidepressants, we investigated if illness characteristics at baseline could predict conversion to bipolar disorder.

Method

A long-term register-based follow-up study of 290 unipolar depressed patients with a mean age of 50.8 years (SD = 11.9) participating in three randomized trials on antidepressants conducted in the period 1985–1994. The independent effects of explanatory variables were examined by applying Cox regression analyses.

Results

The overall risk of conversion was 20.7%, with a mean follow-up time of 15.2 years per patient. The risk of conversion was associated with an increasing number of previous depressive episodes at baseline, [HR 1.18, 95% CI (1.10–1.26)]. No association with gender, age, age at first depressive episode, duration of baseline episode, subtype of depression or any of the investigated HAM-D subscales included was found.

Limitations

The patients were followed-up through the Danish Psychiatric Central Research Register, which resulted in inherent limitations such as possible misclassification of outcome.

Conclusion

In a sample of middle-aged hospitalized unipolar depressed patients participating in trials on antidepressants, the risk of conversion was associated with the number of previous depressive episodes. Therefore, this study emphasizes that unipolar depressed patients experiencing a relatively high number of recurrences should be followed more closely, or at least be informed about the possible increased risk of conversion.

Differences in symptom expression between unipolar and bipolar spectrum depression: Results from a nationally representative sample using item response theory (IRT)

BACKGROUND

The inclusion of subsyndromal forms of bipolarity in the fifth edition of the DSM has major implications for the way in which we approach the diagnosis of individuals with depressive symptoms. The aim of the present study was to use methods based on item response theory (IRT) to examine whether, when equating for levels of depression severity, there are differences in the likelihood of reporting DSM-IV symptoms of major depressive episode (MDE) between subjects with and without a lifetime history of manic symptoms.

METHODS

We conducted these analyses using a large, nationally representative sample from the USA (n=34,653), the second wave of the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions.

RESULTS

The items sadness, appetite disturbance and psychomotor symptoms were better indicators of depression severity in participants without a lifetime history of manic symptoms, in a clinically meaningful way. DSM-IV symptoms of MDE were substantially less informative in participants with a lifetime history of manic symptoms than in those without such history.

LIMITATIONS

Clinical information on DSM-IV depressive and manic symptoms was based on retrospective self-report

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical presentation of depressive symptoms may substantially differ in individuals with and without a lifetime history of manic symptoms. These findings alert to the possibility of atypical symptomatic presentations among individuals with co-occurring symptoms or disorders and highlight the importance of continued research into specific pathophysiology differentiating unipolar and bipolar depression.

The prevalence of pain in bipolar disorder: a systematic review and large-scale meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To conduct a meta-analysis investigating the prevalence of pain in people with bipolar disorder (BD).

METHOD

A systematic review and random effects meta-analysis searching major electronic databases from inception till 01/2014 in accordance with the PRISMA statement. We included articles reporting quantitative data on the prevalence of pain in people with BD with or without a healthy control group. Two independent authors conducted searches, extracted data, and completed methodological quality assessment.

RESULTS

Twenty two cross-sectional studies were included, representing 12,375,644 individuals (BD n=171,352, n controls=12,204,292). The prevalence of pain in people with BD was 28.9% (95% CI=16.4-43.4%, BD n=171,352). The relative risk (RR) of pain in BD compared to controls was 2.14 (95% CI=1.67-2.75%, n=12,342,577). The prevalence of migraine was 14.2% (95% CI=10.6-18.3%, BD n=127,905), and the RR was 3.30 (95% CI=2.27-4.80%, n=6,732,220).About 23.7% (95% CI=13.1-36.3%, n=106,214) of people with BD experienced chronic pain. Age, percentage of males, methodological quality, and method of BD classification did not explain the observed heterogeneity.

CONCLUSION

People with BD experience significantly increased levels of pain (particularly chronic pain and migraine). The assessment and treatment of pain should form an integral part of the management of BD.

Pathways between neurocognition, social cognition and emotion regulation in bipolar disorder

OBJECTIVE

Converging evidence suggests that in bipolar disorder (BD), social cognition and emotion regulation are affected by the capacity for effective neurocognitive function. Adaptive emotion regulation may also rely on intact social cognition, and it is possible that social cognition acts as a mediator in its relationship with neurocognition. We aimed to address this hypothesis by explicitly examining interrelationships among neurocognition, social cognition and emotion regulation in an out-patient sample meeting criteria for a DSM-IV-TR diagnosis of BD compared with controls.

METHOD

Fifty-one BD patients and 52 healthy controls completed a battery of tests assessing neurocognition, social cognition (emotion perception and theory of mind) and emotion regulation.

RESULTS

Path analysis revealed that in BD, neurocognition was associated with social cognition, but social cognition was not associated with emotion regulation as expected. In contrast, a component of social cognition was found to mediate the relationship between neurocognition and emotion regulation in healthy controls.

CONCLUSION

These findings highlight differences in the pattern of associations between neurocognition, social cognition and emotion regulation across BD patients and controls. In the present data, these results appear to indicate that neurocognitive and social cognitive abilities generally operate in isolation from emotion regulation in BD.

Psychomotor retardation in depression: a systematic review of diagnostic, pathophysiologic, and therapeutic implications

Psychomotor retardation is a central feature of depression which includes motor and cognitive impairments. Effective management may be useful to improve the classification of depressive subtypes and treatment selection, as well as prediction of outcome in patients with depression. The aim of this paper was to review the current status of knowledge regarding psychomotor retardation in depression, in order to clarify its role in the diagnostic management of mood disorders. Retardation modifies all the actions of the individual, including motility, mental activity, and speech. Objective assessments can highlight the diagnostic importance of psychomotor retardation, especially in melancholic and bipolar depression. Psychomotor retardation is also related to depression severity and therapeutic change and could be considered a good criterion for the prediction of therapeutic effect. The neurobiological process underlying the inhibition of activity includes functional deficits in the prefrontal cortex and abnormalities in dopamine neurotransmission. Future investigations of psychomotor retardation should help improve the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying mood disorders and contribute to improving their therapeutic management.

Psychomotor retardation in depression: a systematic review of diagnostic, pathophysiologic, and therapeutic implications

Psychomotor retardation is a central feature of depression which includes motor and cognitive impairments. Effective management may be useful to improve the classification of depressive subtypes and treatment selection, as well as prediction of outcome in patients with depression. The aim of this paper was to review the current status of knowledge regarding psychomotor retardation in depression, in order to clarify its role in the diagnostic management of mood disorders. Retardation modifies all the actions of the individual, including motility, mental activity, and speech. Objective assessments can highlight the diagnostic importance of psychomotor retardation, especially in melancholic and bipolar depression. Psychomotor retardation is also related to depression severity and therapeutic change and could be considered a good criterion for the prediction of therapeutic effect. The neurobiological process underlying the inhibition of activity includes functional deficits in the prefrontal cortex and abnormalities in dopamine neurotransmission. Future investigations of psychomotor retardation should help improve the understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying mood disorders and contribute to improving their therapeutic management.

Activated depression: mixed bipolar disorder or agitated unipolar depression?

The combination of depression and activation presents clinical and diagnostic challenges. It can occur, in either bipolar disorder or major depressive disorder, as increased agitation as a dimension of depression. What is called agitation can consist of expressions of painful inner tension or as disinhibited goal-directed behavior and thought. In bipolar disorder, elements of depression can be combined with those of mania. In this case, the agitation, in addition to increased motor activity and painful inner tension, must include symptoms of mania that are related to goal-directed behavior or manic cognition. These diagnostic considerations are important, as activated depression potentially carries increased behavioral risk, especially for suicidal behavior, and optimal treatments for depressive episodes differ between bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder.

Distinguishing young people with emerging bipolar disorders from those with unipolar depression

BACKGROUND

To facilitate early intervention, there is a need to distinguish unipolar versus bipolar illness trajectories in adolescents and young adults with adult-type mood disorders.

METHODS

Detailed clinical and neuropsychological evaluation of 308 young persons (aged 12 to 30 years) with moderately severe unipolar and bipolar affective disorders.

RESULTS

Almost 30% (90/308) of young people (mean age=19.4±4.4yr) presenting for care with affective disorders met criteria for a bipolar-type syndrome (26% with bipolar I). Subjects with bipolar- and unipolar-type syndromes were of similar age (19.8 vs. 19.2yr) and reported comparable ages of onset (14.5 vs. 14.3yr). Clinically, those subjects with unipolar and bipolar-type disorders reported similar levels of psychological distress, depressive symptoms, current role impairment, neuropsychological dysfunction and alcohol or other substance misuse. Subjects with unipolar disorders reported more social anxiety (p<0.01). Subjects with bipolar disorders were more likely to report a family history of bipolar (21% vs. 11%; [χ(2)=4.0, p<.05]) or psychotic (19% vs. 9%; [χ(2)=5.5, p<.05]), or substance misuse (35% vs. 23%; [χ(2)=3.9, p<.05]), but not depressive (48% vs. 53%; χ(2)=0.3, p=.582]) disorders.

CONCLUSIONS

Young subjects with bipolar disorders were best discriminated by a family history of bipolar, psychotic or substance use disorders. Early in the course of illness, clinical features of depression, or neuropsychological function, do not readily differentiate the two illness trajectories.

Depression in bipolar disorder versus major depressive disorder: results from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions

OBJECTIVES

To compare the clinical features and course of major depressive episodes (MDEs) occurring in subjects with bipolar I disorder (BD-I), bipolar II disorder (BD-II), and major depressive disorder (MDD).

METHODS

Data were drawn from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (2001-2002), a nationally representative face-to-face survey of more than 43000 adults in the USA, including 5695 subjects with lifetime MDD, 935 with BD-I and lifetime MDE, and 494 with BD-II and lifetime MDE. Differences on sociodemographic characteristics and clinical features, course, and treatment patterns of MDE were analyzed.

RESULTS

Most depressive symptoms, family psychiatric history, anxiety disorders, alcohol and drug use disorders, and personality disorders were more frequent-and number of depressive symptoms per MDE was higher-among subjects with BD-I, followed by BD-II, and MDD. BD-I individuals experienced a higher number of lifetime MDEs, had a poorer quality of life, and received significantly more treatment for MDE than BD-II and MDD subjects. Individuals with BD-I and BD-II experienced their first mood episode about ten years earlier than those with MDD (21.2, 20.5, and 30.4 years, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Our results support the existence of a spectrum of severity of MDE, with highest severity for BD-I, followed by BD-II and MDD, suggesting the utility of dimensional assessments in current categorical classifications.

Depression across mood disorders: review and analysis in a clinical sample

OBJECTIVES

In this article we aimed to: (1) review literature concerning the clinical and psychopathologic characteristics of Bipolar (BP) depression; (2) analyze an independent sample of depressed patients to identify any demographic and/or clinical feature that may help in differentiating mood disorder subtypes, with special attention to potential markers of bipolarity.

METHODS

A sample of 291 depressed subjects, including BP -I (n = 104), BP -II (n = 64), and unipolar (UP) subjects with (n = 53) and without (n = 70) BP family history (BPFH), was examined to evidence potential differences in clinical presentation and to validate literature-derived markers of bipolarity. Demographic and clinical variables and, also, single items from the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS), and the Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS) were compared among groups.

RESULTS

UP subjects had an older age at onset of mood symptoms. A higher number of major depressive episodes and a higher incidence of lifetime psychotic features were found in BP subjects. Items expressing depressed mood, depressive anhedonia, pessimistic thoughts, and neurovegetative symptoms of depression scored higher in UP, whereas depersonalization and paranoid symptoms' scores were higher in BP. When compared with UP, BP I had a significantly higher incidence of intradepressive hypomanic symptoms. Bipolar family history was found to be the strongest predictor of bipolarity in depression.

CONCLUSIONS

Overall, our findings confirm most of the classical signs of bipolarity in depression and support the view that some features, such as BPFH, together with some specific symptoms may help in detecting depressed subjects at higher risk for BP disorder.

A predictive model for diagnosing bipolar disorder based on the clinical characteristics of major depressive episodes in Chinese population

BACKGROUND

A correct timely diagnosis of bipolar depression remains a big challenge for clinicians. This study aimed to develop a clinical characteristic based model to predict the diagnosis of bipolar disorder among patients with current major depressive episodes.

METHODS

A prospective study was carried out on 344 patients with current major depressive episodes, with 268 completing 1-year follow-up. Data were collected through structured interviews. Univariate binary logistic regression was conducted to select potential predictive variables among 19 initial variables, and then multivariate binary logistic regression was performed to analyze the combination of risk factors and build a predictive model. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was plotted.

RESULTS

Of 19 initial variables, 13 variables were preliminarily selected, and then forward stepwise exercise produced a final model consisting of 6 variables: age at first onset, maximum duration of depressive episodes, somatalgia, hypersomnia, diurnal variation of mood, irritability. The correct prediction rate of this model was 78% (95%CI: 75%-86%) and the area under the ROC curve was 0.85 (95%CI: 0.80-0.90). The cut-off point for age at first onset was 28.5 years old, while the cut-off point for maximum duration of depressive episode was 7.5 months.

LIMITATIONS

The limitations of this study include small sample size, relatively short follow-up period and lack of treatment information.

CONCLUSION

Our predictive models based on six clinical characteristics of major depressive episodes prove to be robust and can help differentiate bipolar depression from unipolar depression.

Comparison of depressive episodes in bipolar disorder and in major depressive disorder within bipolar disorder pedigrees

BACKGROUND

Although genetic epidemiological studies have confirmed increased rates of major depressive disorder among the relatives of people with bipolar affective disorder, no report has compared the clinical characteristics of depression between these two groups.

AIMS

To compare clinical features of depressive episodes across participants with major depressive disorder and bipolar disorder from within bipolar disorder pedigrees, and assess the utility of a recently proposed probabilistic approach to distinguishing bipolar from unipolar depression. A secondary aim was to identify subgroups within the relatives with major depression potentially indicative of 'genetic' and 'sporadic' subgroups.

METHOD

Patients with bipolar disorder types 1 and 2 (n = 246) and patients with major depressive disorder from bipolar pedigrees (n = 120) were assessed using the Diagnostic Interview for Genetic Studies. Logistic regression was used to identify distinguishing clinical features and assess the utility of the probabilistic approach. Hierarchical cluster analysis was used to identify subgroups within the major depressive disorder sample.

RESULTS

Bipolar depression was characterised by significantly higher rates of psychomotor retardation, difficulty thinking, early morning awakening, morning worsening and psychotic features. Depending on the threshold employed, the probabilistic approach yielded a positive predictive value ranging from 74% to 82%. Two clusters within the major depressive disorder sample were found, one of which demonstrated features characteristic of bipolar depression, suggesting a possible 'genetic' subgroup.

CONCLUSIONS

A number of previously identified clinical differences between unipolar and bipolar depression were confirmed among participants from within bipolar disorder pedigrees. Preliminary validation of the probabilistic approach in differentiating between unipolar and bipolar depression is consistent with dimensional distinctions between the two disorders and offers clinical utility in identifying patients who may warrant further assessment for bipolarity. The major depressive disorder clusters potentially reflect genetic and sporadic subgroups which, if replicated independently, might enable an improved phenotypic definition of underlying bipolarity in genetic analyses.

Polarity at illness onset in bipolar I disorder and clinical course of illness

OBJECTIVES

Studies have suggested that episode polarity at illness onset in bipolar disorder may be predictive of some aspects of lifetime clinical characteristics. We here examine this possibility in a large, well-characterized sample of patients with bipolar I disorder.

METHODS

We assessed polarity at onset in patients with bipolar I disorder (N = 553) recruited as part of our ongoing studies of affective disorders. Lifetime clinical characteristics of illness were compared in patients who had a depressive episode at first illness onset (n = 343) and patients who had a manic episode at first illness onset (n = 210).

RESULTS

Several lifetime clinical features differed between patients according to the polarity of their onset episode of illness. A logistic regression analysis showed that the lifetime clinical features significantly associated with a depressive episode at illness onset in our sample were: an earlier age at illness onset; a predominantly depressive polarity during the lifetime; more frequent and more severe depressive episodes; and less prominent lifetime psychotic features.

CONCLUSIONS

Knowledge of pole of onset may help the clinician in providing prognostic information and management advice to an individual with bipolar disorder.

Diagnostic guidelines for bipolar depression: a probabilistic approach

OBJECTIVES

There are currently no accepted diagnostic criteria for bipolar depression for either research or clinical purposes. This paper aimed to develop recommendations for diagnostic criteria for bipolar I depression.

METHODS

Studies on the clinical characteristics of bipolar and unipolar depression were reviewed. To identify relevant papers, literature searches using PubMed and Medline were undertaken.

RESULTS

There are no pathognomonic characteristics of bipolar I depression compared to unipolar depressive disorder. There are, however, replicated findings of clinical characteristics that are more common in both bipolar I depression and unipolar depressive disorder, respectively, or which are observed in unipolar-depressed patients who 'convert' (i.e., who later develop hypo/manic symptoms) to bipolar disorder over time. The following features are more common in bipolar I depression (or in unipolar 'converters' to bipolar disorder): 'atypical' depressive features such as hypersomnia, hyperphagia, and leaden paralysis; psychomotor retardation; psychotic features, and/or pathological guilt; and lability of mood. Furthermore, bipolar-depressed patients are more likely to have an earlier age of onset of their first depressive episode, to have more prior episodes of depression, to have shorter depressive episodes, and to have a family history of bipolar disorder. The following features are more common in unipolar depressive disorder: initial insomnia/reduced sleep; appetite, and/or weight loss; normal or increased activity levels; somatic complaints; later age of onset of first depressive episode; prolonged episodes; and no family history of bipolar disorder.

CONCLUSIONS

Rather than proposing a categorical diagnostic distinction between bipolar depression and major depressive disorder, we would recommend a 'probabilistic' (or likelihood) approach. While there is no 'point of rarity' between the two presentations, there is, rather, a differential likelihood of experiencing the above symptoms and signs of depression. A table outlining draft proposed operationalized criteria for such an approach is provided. The specific details of such a probabilistic approach need to be further explored. For example, to be useful, any diagnostic innovation should inform treatment choices.

Depression subtypes in bipolar I and II disorders

BACKGROUND

Depression is the predominant mood alteration in bipolar I and II disorders. In this study, the nature of major depressive episodes of bipolar I versus bipolar II patients is specifically assessed, as regards lifetime history of rapid cycling, melancholia, atypical and psychotic symptoms.

METHODS

The patient sample consisted of 184 bipolar I and 80 bipolar II patients, according to the research diagnostic criteria, who entered the bipolar disorders program in our hospital. Subsets of patients are compared according to DSM-IV criteria for rapid cycling, melancholic, atypical and psychotic features.

RESULTS

Bipolar I patients had significantly more psychotic symptoms in their lifetime histories (p < 0.001), whereas bipolar II patients had significantly more atypical symptoms in their lifetime histories (p < 0.003). Although melancholia was more prevalent in the bipolar I and rapid cycling was more prevalent in the bipolar II subgroup, these differences did not reach statistical significance.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the study suggest that marked differences exist in the nature of major depressive episodes between bipolar I and II patients, as they in the long term emerge from the two conditions. To what extent both conditions are related cannot be ascertained in the present study. Clinical differences may have relevant therapeutic implications and separate trials for bipolar I and bipolar II depression are warranted.

Bipolar disorder: how far are we from a rigorous definition and effective management?

Bipolar disorder is a pathological disturbance of mood, characterized by waxing and waning manic, depressive and, sometimes distinctly mixed states. A diagnosis of bipolar disorder can only be made with certainty when the manic syndrome declares itself. Most individuals who are diagnosed with this disorder will experience both poles of the illness recurrently, but depressive episodes are the commonest cause of morbidity and, indeed, of death by suicide. Twin, adoption and epidemiological studies suggest a strongly genetic aetiology. It is a genetically and phenotypically complex disorder. Thus, the genes contributing are likely to be numerous and of small effect. Individuals with bipolar disorder also display deficits on a range of neuropsychological tasks in both the acute and euthymic phases of illness and correlations between number of affective episodes experienced and task performance are commonly reported. Current self-report and observer-rated scales are optimized for unipolar depression and hence limited in their ability to accurately assess bipolar depression. The development of a specific depression rating scale will improve the assessment of bipolar depression in both research and clinical settings. It will improve the development of better treatments and interventions. Guidelines support the use of antidepressants for bipolar depression. With regard to the adverse effects of antidepressants for bipolar depression, double-blind, placebo-controlled data suggest that antidepressant monotherapy or the addition of a tricyclic antidepressant may worsen the course of bipolar disorder. Importantly, adjunctive psychotherapies add significantly (both statistically and clinically) to the efficacy of pharmacological treatment regimens. The successful management of bipolar disorder clearly demands improved recognition of bipolar disorder and effective long-term treatment for bipolar depression as well as mania.

Bipolar II and the bipolar spectrum

In studies made in the last decade, patients consulting doctors because of depression and anxiety have very often turned out to suffer from bipolar type II and similar conditions with alternating depression and hypomania/mania (the bipolar spectrum disorders - BP). Specifically, about every second patient seeking consultation because of depression has been shown to suffer from BP, mainly bipolar type II. BP is often concealed by other psychiatric conditions, e.g. recurrent depression, psychosis, anxiety, addiction, personality disorder, attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder and eating disorder. BP shows strong heredity. Relatives of patients with BP also have a high frequency of the psychiatric conditions just mentioned. Conversion ("switching") from recurrent unipolar depressions (recurrent UP) to BP is common in very long longitudinal studies (over decades). Mood-stabilizing medicines are recommended to a great extent in the treatment of BP, since anti-depressive medicines are often not effective and involve a substantial risk of inducing mood swings. Particularly in the long-term pharmacological treatment of depression in BP anti-depressive medicines may worsen the condition, e.g. inducing a symptom triad of dysphoria, irritability and insomnia: ACID (antidepressant-associated chronic irritable dysphoria).

The nature and treatment of depression in bipolar disorder: A review and implications for future psychological investigation

Bipolar depression is poorly understood and researched, yet it is has a huge impact on functioning in bipolar disorder. This review explores the current status of research regarding the phenomenology, natural history, neuropsychology, psychosocial predictors and cognitive style of bipolar depression. The current status of pharmacotherapy and psychological treatment of bipolar depression is also described. In particular, the manner in which cognitive behaviour therapy for bipolar depression has been adapted from CBT for unipolar depression is critically evaluated. It is concluded that there appears to be a considerable overlap between the features of unipolar and bipolar depression, yet there is also emerging evidence for specific elements. The ability of current psychological theories of bipolar disorder to account for the findings are compared, and as a consequence, a new preliminary integrative model is proposed to direct future hypothesis-led research, which will need to incorporate more suitable populations and utilise more objective methods of assessment.

Distinctions between bipolar and unipolar depression

This is a review of the studies comparing unipolar and bipolar depression, with focus on the course, symptomatology, neurobiology, and psychosocial literatures. These are reviewed with one question in mind: does the evidence support diagnosing bipolar and unipolar depressions as the same disorder or different? The current nomenclature of bipolar and unipolar disorders has resulted in research that compares these disorders as a whole, without considering depression separately from mania within bipolar disorder. Future research should investigate two broad categories of depression and mania as separate disease processes that are highly comorbid.

Practical Clues to Early Recognition of Bipolar Disorder: A Primary Care Approach

Early treatment can favorably impact the course of bipolar disorder, a lifelong illness. Because bipolar disorder can masquerade as various mental and physical illnesses-primarily major depressive disorder-patients with this condition frequently go unrecognized for years. During this recognition lag, such patients may present to their primary care physician on multiple occasions. Accordingly, primary care physicians would benefit from knowing the "clues" to early recognition of the disorder, because early recognition and management can reduce disability, improve social and employment stability, and result in improved functional outcomes. This review describes 3 pathways to the diagnosis of bipolar disorder relevant to the primary care setting: detection of mania or hypomania, differential diagnosis of recurrent depressive episodes, and identification of interepisode disorder and its comorbidities. We summarize these pathways in terms of a practical tool that a primary care physician can use to trigger further evaluation or referral.

Irritable psychomotor elation in depressed inpatients: a factor validation of mixed depression

BACKGROUND

Early authors described hypomanic symptoms as mixed features in depressive episode, but this syndrome has not been sufficiently explored in previous studies.

METHODS

958 consecutive depressed patients were assessed by using a standardized method in terms of 43 psychiatric symptoms at hospitalization.

RESULTS

A principal component analysis, followed by varimax rotation, extracted six interpretable factors: typical vegetative symptoms, depressive retardation/loss of feeling, hypomanic syndrome, anxiety, psychosis, and depressive mood/hopelessness. The extracted factor structure was relatively stable among several patient groups. There was no evidence that the hypomanic factor was exaggerated by antidepressant pretreatments before hospitalization. Bipolar diagnoses were associated with higher scores on depressive retardation and hypomanic symptoms, and a lower score on anxiety.

LIMITATIONS

Psychiatric syndromes and their interrelationships, found in the present study, may be strongly influenced by the rating instrument used. The sample of this study was depressed inpatients. The results should not be generalized for depressed outpatients or epidemiological depressed populations.

CONCLUSIONS

Hypomanic symptoms, as characterized by the flight of ideas, racing thought, increased drive, excessive social contact, irritability, and aggression are a salient syndrome in acutely ill depressed patients, lending support to the factor validity of mixed depression. The symptoms may not be related to pretreatments with antidepressants, or comorbidity of substance abuse, suggesting that they reflect various natural phenomenological manifestations of depressive episodes. Anxiety is unlikely to play a major role in the core phenomenological features of mixed depression. Hypomanic symptoms during a depressive episode were more represented in bipolar disorders, which may serve for further clarifications of latent bipolarity in unipolar depression, and prediction of switch into maniform states under biological depression treatments.

Bipolar depression: phenomenological overview and clinical characteristics

OBJECTIVES

There has been increasing interest in the depressed phase of bipolar disorder (bipolar depression). This paper aims to review the clinical characteristics of bipolar depression, focusing upon its prevalence and phenomenology, related neuropsychological dysfunction, suicidal behaviour, disability and treatment responsiveness.

METHODS

Studies on the prevalence of depression in bipolar disorder, the comparative phenomenology of bipolar and unipolar depression, as well as neuropsychology and brain imaging studies, are reviewed. To identify relevant papers, a literature search using MEDLINE and PubMed was undertaken.

RESULTS

Depression is the predominant mood disturbance in bipolar disorder, and most frequently presents as subsyndromal, minor or dysthymic depression. Compared with major depressive disorder (unipolar depression), bipolar depression is more likely to manifest with psychosis, melancholic symptoms, psychomotor retardation (in bipolar I disorder) and 'atypical' symptoms. The few neuropsychological studies undertaken indicate greater impairment in bipolar depression. Suicide rates are high in bipolar disorder, with suicidal ideation, suicide attempts and completed suicides all occurring predominantly in the depressed phase of this condition. Furthermore, the depressed phase (even subsyndromal) appears to be the major contributant to the disability related to this condition.

CONCLUSIONS

The significance of the depressed phase of bipolar disorder has been markedly underestimated. Bipolar depression accounts for most of the morbidity and mortality due to this illness. Current treatments have significant limitations.

Bipolar spectrum disorder: a pilot study

OBJECTIVE

To assess depressive features of a proposed definition of bipolar spectrum disorder (BSD).

METHODS

Thirty-six patients with bipolar disorder type I or II were compared to 37 patients with unipolar major depressive disorder through patient interview and chart review.

RESULTS

Univariate analysis suggests that 7 of 12 (recurrent major depressive episodes, brief major depressive episodes, atypical depressive symptoms, early age of onset, family history of bipolar disorder, antidepressant tolerance, and antidepressant-induced mania) features of major depressive episodes were more likely to occur in bipolar versus unipolar patients. After adjustment in a multivariable regression model, however, the five most powerful predictors of bipolar disorder were brief major depressive episodes, early age of onset, antidepressant- induced mania, postpartum depression, and atypical depressive symptoms.

CONCLUSIONS

This preliminary study supports the idea that bipolar disorder is characterized by some depressive features less likely to be found in unipolar depression. Further prospective study needs to be conducted comparing BSD with unipolar depression.

Depressive syndrome in major psychoses: a study on 1351 subjects

The aim of this study was to investigate depressive symptomatology across distinct major psychiatric disorders. A total of 1351 subjects affected by major depressive disorder (MDD = 389), bipolar disorder (BP = 511), delusional disorder (DD = 93) and schizophrenia (SKZ = 358) were included in our study. Subjects were assessed using the Operational Criteria for Psychotic Illness checklist (OPCRIT). The most frequently represented depressive symptoms in MDD were Loss of energy/tiredness, Loss of pleasure, Poor concentration, and Sleep disorders. Compared with MDD, BP had higher occurrences of Agitated activity, Excessive sleep, and Increased appetite and/or Weight gain, as well as lower Loss of pleasure. In our sample, 32.3% and 26.8% of DD and SKZ, respectively, had quite consistent depressive symptomatology, with at least four or more depressive symptoms. The most common depressive symptoms were Sleep disorders, Poor concentration and Loss of energy/Tiredness, followed by Psychomotor symptoms in SKZ only. Excessive self-reproach, Suicidal ideation, and Appetite and/or Weight changes were more specific to mood disorders. Finally, compared with SKZ, DD suffered from more depressive symptoms and had more severe depressive symptomatology. A quite consistent level of depressive symptomatology is therefore present in subpopulations of delusional and schizophrenic subjects other than in affective subjects. We identified some symptoms that are common across all major psychoses and symptoms that are more specific to each group.

Melancholic outpatient depression in Bipolar-II vs. unipolar

BACKGROUND

DSM-IV melancholic major depressive episode (MDE) in bipolar II disorder (BP-II) is understudied. Study aim was to compare melancholic MDE in BP-II vs. unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) on diagnostic validators and clinical features.

METHODS

Consecutive 39 BP-II and 34 unipolar MDD outpatients in a private practice were interviewed (off psychopharmacotherapy) with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, as modified by Benazzi and Akiskal [J. Affect. Disord. 73 (2003) 1], when presenting for treatment of MDE. DSM-IV criteria of melancholic features specifier were followed. Variables studied were index age, gender, age at onset of the first MDE, number of MDE recurrences, severity (measured by GAF, index MDE psychotic features, index MDE symptoms lasting more than 2 years, Axis I comorbidity), index MDE and melancholic symptoms, bipolar family history. Diagnostic validators were onset, family history, course of illness, and clinical picture.

RESULTS

BP-II melancholic MDE, vs. MDD melancholic MDE, had significantly lower age at onset and more bipolar family history. Psychomotor agitation was significantly more common in BP-II melancholic MDE, but was present only in 43.5%. Psychomotor retardation was more common in MDD melancholic MDE at a trend level, but was present only in 20.5%.

CONCLUSIONS

Psychomotor agitation was more common in BP-II melancholic MDE vs. unipolar MDD, while previous studies on bipolar I (BP-I) had usually found more retardation. The difference could be related to BP-I and BP-II being at least partly distinct disorders. The relatively low frequency of psychomotor change does not seem to support the view that this is the core feature of melancholia. Differences on diagnostic validators (most importantly family history) further support the distinction of melancholic MDE between BP-II and MDD, and support DSM-IV classification.

Sleep disturbance in unipolar and bipolar depression: relationship to psychiatric family history

Eighty depressed patients (40 bipolar and 40 unipolar) were personally interviewed in order to assess the relationship of disturbed sleep with psychiatric family history. Complaints of unsatisfactory sleep quantity and/or quality were more common among patients with a negative than among those with a positive family history for either any major psychiatric disorder (74.5 vs. 43.3%, p < 0.01) or only a mood disorder (68.4 vs. 43.5%, p < 0.05); this was more pronounced in bipolar patients. Results were confirmed when demographic variables and clinical characteristics of the disease were taken into consideration through the use of multiple logistic regression analysis. It is, thus, suggested that the mechanisms underlying disturbed sleep during a major depressive episode are different to those associated with the familial predisposition for depression.

Clinical and demographic features of mood disorder subtypes

The aim of this study was to investigate demographic, clinical and symptomatologic features of the following mood disorder subtypes: bipolar disorder I (BP-I); bipolar disorder II (BP-II); major depressive disorder, recurrent (MDR); and major depressive episode, single episode (MDSE). A total of 1832 patients with mood disorders (BP-I=863, BP-II=141, MDR=708, and MDSE=120) were included in our study. The patients were assessed using structured diagnostic interviews and the operational criteria for psychotic illness checklist (n=885), the Hamilton depression rating scale (n=167), and the social adjustment scale (n=305). The BP-I patients were younger; had more hospital admissions; presented a more severe form of symptomatology in terms of psychotic symptoms, disorganization, and atypical features; and showed less insight into their disorder than patients in the other groups. Compared with the major depressive subgroups, BP-I patients were more likely to have an earlier age at onset, an earlier first lifetime psychiatric treatment, and a greater number of illness episodes. BP-II patients had a higher suicide risk than both BP-I and MDSE patients. MDSE patients presented less severe symptomatology, lower age at observation, and a higher number of males. The retrospective approach and the selection constraints due to the inclusion criteria are the main limitations of the study. Our data support the view that BP-I disorder is quite different from the remaining mood disorders from a demographic and clinical perspective, with BP-II disorder having an intermediate position to MDR and MDSE, that is, as a less severe disorder. This finding may help in the search for the biological basis of mood disorders.

Co-occurrence of disturbed sleep and appetite loss differentiates between unipolar and bipolar depressive episodes

The aim of this study was to examine whether the co-occurrence of disturbed sleep and appetite loss, two commonly encountered somatic symptoms of depression, can differentiate the clinical expression of depressive episodes between bipolar (BP) and unipolar patients (UP). Forty BP and 40 UP outpatients were interviewed through the Schedules for the Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry (SCAN) and the presence of sleep disturbance and appetite loss during their most severe depressive episode was determined. Other variables studied were patients' gender and age, clinical characteristics related to the course of the disease (age at onset, duration of illness, and number and frequency of depressive and manic episodes), severity of the worst major depressive episode, and presence or absence of certain associated symptoms during that episode (loss of energy, low interest, feelings of guilt and/or self-reproach, impaired concentration, suicidal ideation, and agitation or retardation). Appetite loss was found to be more frequently present in UP (78%) than BP patients (55%, P<.05). No significant difference in the occurrence of sleep disturbance was found between the two groups. Among BP patients, appetite loss was present in 73% of those with sleep disturbance vs. 33% of those without (P<.02), while no such difference in co-occurrence of sleep disturbance and appetite loss was noticed among UP patients (74% vs. 85%, respectively, n.s.); this finding did not seem to be related to differences in severity of depression among UP and BP patients. Furthermore, those BP patients with co-occurrence of the two somatic symptoms complained also of loss of energy and low interest more often than those without (P<.01 and P<.05, respectively). No similar differences were observed among UP patients. The results of the present study suggest that the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying depressive episodes may differ between BP and UP affective disorder, and that those BP patients with simultaneous occurrence of sleep disturbance and appetite loss can be considered to belong to a particular nosologic subgroup with potential therapeutic and prognostic implications.

"Cade's disease" and beyond: misdiagnosis, antidepressant use, and a proposed definition for bipolar spectrum disorder

The diagnosis and treatment of bipolar disorder (BD) has been inconsistent and frequently misunderstood in recent years. To identify the causes of this problem and suggest possible solutions, we undertook a critical review of studies concerning the nosology of BD and the effects of antidepressant agents. Both the underdiagnosis of BD and its frequent misdiagnosis as unipolar major depressive disorder (MDD) appear to be problems in patients with BD. Underdiagnosis results from clinicians' inadequate understanding of manic symptoms, from patients' impaired insight into mania, and especially from failure to involve family members or third parties in the diagnostic process. Some, but by no means all, of the underdiagnosis problem may also result from lack of agreement about the breadth of the bipolar spectrum, beyond classic type I manic-depressive illness (what Ketter has termed "Cade's Disease"). To alleviate confusion about the less classic varieties of bipolar illness, we propose a heuristic definition, "bipolar spectrum disorder." This diagnosis would give greater weight to family history and antidepressant-induced manic symptoms and would apply to non-type I or II bipolar illness, in which depressive symptom, course, and treatment response characteristics are more typical of bipolar than unipolar illness. The role of antidepressants is also controversial. Our review of the evidence leads us to conclude that there should be less emphasis on using antidepressants to treat persons with this illness.

Personality disorders in bipolar and depressive disorders

The association of mood disorders with personality disorders (PDs) is relevant from a clinical, therapeutic and prognostic point of view. To examine this issue, we compared the prevalence of DSM-III-R personality disorders assessed with SCID-II in patients with depressive (n = 117) and bipolar (n = 71) disorders both recovered from a major depressive index episode that needed hospital admission. PDs prevalence and comorbidity with axis I were calculated. Avoidant PD (31.6%) (O.R. = 1.7, C.I. = 1.06-2.9. P < 0.01), borderline PD (30.8%) and obsessive-compulsive PD (30.8%) were the most prevalent axis II diagnoses among patients with depressive disorder. In bipolar disorder group, patients showed more frequently obsessive-compulsive PD (32.4%), followed by borderline PD (29.6%) and avoidant PD (19.7%). Avoidant PD showed a trend toward being significantly more prevalent among depressives (P < 0.07). A different pattern of PDs emerges between depressive and bipolar patients.

Bipolar depression: pharmacotherapy and related therapeutic strategies

The depressed phase of bipolar affective disorder is a significant cause of suffering, disability, and mortality and represents a major challenge to treating clinicians. This article first briefly reviews the phenomenology and clinical correlates of bipolar depression and then focuses on the major pharmacological treatment options. We strongly recommend use of mood stabilizers as the first-line treatment for the type I form of bipolar depression, largely because longer-term preventative therapy with these agents almost certainly will be indicated. Depressive episodes that do not respond to lithium, divalproex, or another mood stabilizer, or episodes that "breakthrough" despite preventive treatment, often warrant treatment with an antidepressant or electroconvulsive therapy. The necessity of mood stabilizers in the type II form of bipolar depression is less certain, aside from the rapid cycling presentation. Both experts and practicing clinicians recommend bupropion and the selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors as coequal initial choices, with venlafaxine and monoamine oxidase inhibitors, such as tranylcypromine, preferred for more resistant cases. The risk of antidepressant-induced hypomania or mania with concomitant mood stabilizer therapy is low, on the order of 5% to 10% during acute phase therapy. Additional therapeutic options and optimal durations of therapy also are discussed.

Bipolar versus unipolar psychotic outpatient depression

BACKGROUND

The relationship between bipolar and unipolar psychotic depression has not been well studied. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare bipolar with unipolar psychotic outpatient depression.

METHODS

Seventy consecutive unipolar (n = 40) and bipolar (n = 30) psychotic depressed outpatients were interviewed with the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV, the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale, the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, and the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.

RESULTS

Of the variables studied (age, duration of illness, severity, recurrences, atypical features, chronicity, gender, comorbidity, hallucinations, delusions), none was significantly different between unipolar and bipolar psychotic patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Bipolar psychotic depression was similar to unipolar psychotic depression on variables reported in the literature to distinguish bipolar from unipolar disorder.

CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS

The findings might suggest, but do not necessarily imply, that psychotic depression might be a distinct clinical entity.

LIMITATIONS

Single interviewer, nonblind cross-sectional assessment, outpatient sample, sample size.

A two-illness model of bipolar disorder

The current approach to mood disorders is that bipolar disorder, comprising both mania and depression, is a discreet illness distinct from unipolar depression. This formulation has profoundly influenced the approach to understanding the biology and etiology of these disorders, as well as the manner in which the various phases of bipolar disorder are treated. Our new model suggests that bipolar disorder comprises two distinct illnesses, mania and depression, and that bipolar depression is no different from unipolar depression. Studies of clinical syndromes, course of illness, family history and genetics, biological factors, and treatment response data directly or indirectly support this new model.

Does sleep EEG data distinguish between UP, BPI or BPII major depressions? An age and gender controlled study

Clinical characteristics and sleep EEG data of 14 unipolar (UPR), 14 bipolar I (BPI) and 14 bipolar II (BPII) patients, matched for age and gender, were investigated during a major depressive episode. We observed a remarkable similarity in the clinical characteristics of the three samples and, concerning sleep EEG data, a trend to a higher percentage of awakening among BPI patients. Pairwise comparisons of the three subgroups showed that only the Newcastle rating scale score reached significant difference between BPI and UPR groups. We observed trends regarding the difference of awakening both between BPI and BPII groups and between BPI and UPR groups, difference of percentage of REM sleep between BPI and BPII groups and difference of Sleep Period Time between BPII and UPR groups. We also observed that the distribution of REM latencies in the BPI subgroup was different from the two others.

Complex segregation analyses of old order Amish families ascertained through bipolar I individuals

Specific genetic hypotheses about the mode of transmission of bipolar affective disorders were examined by performing complex segregation analyses of Old Order Amish families. The analyses were performed on 1) the total set of 42 families including 689 relatives, 2) a subset of 19 families consisting of those kindreds sharing common ancestors within three generations that contained 333 relatives, and 3) a subset of 23 more distantly related families with 356 relatives. When all 42 families were included in the analyses, the specific mode of transmission that could be distinguished was dependent upon the diagnostic scheme used in the analysis. An autosomal dominant mode of inheritance could be rejected when relatives with bipolar I, atypical bipolar, major depressive disorder, and hypomania were included as affected. When analyses included only the subset of families more closely related, an autosomal dominant inheritance model was found to be consistent with transmission of BP I disorder. It was not possible to distinguish between other transmission models with broader diagnostic schemes in this subset of families. Finally, results of analyses on the subset of more distantly related families suggest that there is a significant proportion of Old Order Amish families in which the genetic factors contributing to the expression of bipolar illness are either polygenic or oligogenic.

Sub-typing depression, III. Development of a clinical algorithm for melancholia and comparison with other diagnostic measures

We describe the development of a clinical algorithm to differentiate melancholic from non-melancholic depression, using refined sets of 'endogeneity' symptoms together with clinician-rated CORE scores assessing psychomotor disturbance. Assignment by the empirically developed algorithm is contrasted with assignment by DSM-III-R and with several other melancholia sub-typing indices. Both the numbers of 'melancholics' assigned by the several systems and their capacity to distinguish 'melancholics' on clinical, demographic and a biological index test (the DST) varied across the systems with the algorithm being as 'successful' as several systems that include inter-episode and treatment response variables. Analyses provide information on the criteria set developed for DSM-IV definition of 'melancholia'.

The Prince Henry Hospital Mood Disorders Unit

In 1985 a Mood Disorders Unit (MDU) was established at Prince Henry Hospital in Sydney as a clinical research module, linked with the psychiatric department of the University of New South Wales. There were three general objectives: first, to provide a specialized state-wide clinical service for the assessment and management of those with affective disorders, particularly treatment-resistant depression; secondly, to make a research contribution; and thirdly, to serve as an academic centre for teaching and training of undergraduate and postgraduate students from a variety of disciplines.