Prognostic significance of pre-S2 antigen and antibody in fulminant hepatitis B. Evidence for heterogeneous serological responses

Sensitivities of four new commercial hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) assays in detection of HBsAg mutant forms

Mutations in hepatitis B virus surface antigen (HBsAg) involving amino acid substitution within the immunodominant "a" determinant may affect the performance of commercial HBsAg assays. The performances of four HBsAg assays that recently received Conformité Européene marking, Advia Centaur HBsAg (Bayer), Monolisa HBsAg Ultra (Bio-Rad), Liaison HBsAg (Dia Sorin), and Vidas HBsAg Ultra (bioMérieux), were compared with that of the routinely used HBsAg assay AxSYM HBsAg V2 (Abbott). Assays were evaluated for (i) analytical sensitivity performance with a national reference HBsAg panel (including 10 samples with calibrated HBsAg concentrations from 0.04 to 2.24 ng/ml) and (ii) the detection of HBsAg mutants by studying a panel of 35 HBsAg mutants (23 collected from patients and 12 recombinant mutants). The limits of detection of these assays were <0.15 ng/ml (from 0.089 to 0.121 ng/ml). The sensitivity performances for mutant virus detection varied, ranging from 37.1% to 91.4%. The lack of detection of these mutants by commercial assays was probably due to the epitope recognition of the anti-HBs assay reagents in the capture phase and in the conjugates. The prevalence and clinical impact of HBsAg mutants are under investigation. However, the manufacturers must be vigilant in the design of the assays in order to reduce the risk of missing a broad range of described S gene mutants.

Gm and Km phenotype frequencies in children with chronic active hepatitis (CAH) B virus infection

Patients with CAH, extrahepatic HBV manifestation and healthy children were studied for presence of Gm 1, 2, 3, 10, 21 factors and Km 1 factor. significantly higher frequency of Gm (1, 2, 3, 10, 21) phenotype was shown in CAH group as compared with the other two groups. Relationship between Km factors and examined groups was not found.

Fulminant hepatic failure

FHF is an uncommon but devastating condition affecting otherwise healthy persons which causes significant morbidity and mortality. The etiologic factor is most commonly viral infection, with drugs and metabolic disorders being relatively less common causes. Hopefully, newer diagnostic techniques such as PCR will increase our understanding of the causes and pathogenesis of this disorder. Medical management at the present time must focus on anticipating, preventing, and rapidly identifying and treating complications that may affect every major organ system. Encouraging research continues on the clinical application of hepatotrophic drugs and artificial liver support systems, both as potentially definitive therapies and as maintenance for patients awaiting transplantation. Consultation with physicians at a transplant center should be sought early in the course of the patient's hospitalization when OLT is being considered. Liver transplantation has dramatically changed the outlook for patients with FHF, with current survival rates in the 55% to 75% range. The continuing challenge for the transplant team is to allocate available donor organs to those patients who would not otherwise survive, but also to provide OLT in a timely fashion to ensure the best chance of post-transplantation recovery. Newer techniques such as heterotopic liver transplantation, reduced-size organ transplantation, and the utilization of living related donors may further improve the survival of these patients.