Preoperative skin preparation and surgical outcome

The need for hair removal in paediatric brain tumour surgery?

INTRODUCTION

Preoperative hair removal is conventional practice within neurosurgery in an attempt to maintain antisepsis. However, there is a lack of evidence to suggest that it makes a difference with regards to infection. This article aims to relate preoperative hair removal to SSIs for paediatric patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective analysis was conducted from a single paediatric neurosurgical database at the University Hospital of Wales. Patients were grouped according to whether they underwent preoperative hair removal or not. Findings were reviewed in light of the previously published literature.

RESULTS

One hundred eighty two paediatric intracranial tumours were operated on between November 2008 and 2019. A total of twenty-six patients (14%) developed an infection post-operatively, of which meningitis was the most common (77%). Eighty-nine operations were undertaken without preoperative hair removal, of which there were a total of fifteen infections (17%). In the hair removal group, there were a total of eleven infections out of ninety-three operations (12%). Overall, the patients without hair removal had a higher infection rate when compared to those with hair removal (17 and 12% respectively), however, this result was not statistically significant (p-value 0.3989).

CONCLUSION

We did not find evidence that hair removal in paediatric neurosurgery effects postoperative infection risk.

A Porcine Model for the Development and Testing of Preoperative Skin Preparations

Clinical preoperative skin preparations (PSPs) do not eradicate skin flora dwelling in the deepest dermal regions. Survivors constitute a persistent infection risk. In search of solutions, we created a porcine model intended for PSP developmental testing. This model employed microbiological techniques sensitive to the deep-dwelling microbial flora as these microorganisms are frequently overlooked when using institutionally-entrenched testing methodologies. Clinical gold-standard PSPs were assessed. Ten Yorkshire pigs were divided into two groups: prepared with either povidone iodine (PVP-I) or chlorhexidine gluconate (CHG) PSP. Bioburdens were calculated on square, 4 cm by 4 cm, full-thickness skin samples homogenized in neutralizing media. Endogenous bioburden of porcine skin (3.3 log10 CFU/cm2) was consistent with natural flora numbers in dry human skin. On-label PSP scrub kits with PVP-I (n = 39) or CHG (n = 40) failed the 2-3 log10-reduction criteria established for PSPs by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), resulting in a 1.46 log10 and 0.58 log10 reduction, respectively. Porcine dermal microbiota mirrored that of humans, displaying abundant staphylococcal species. Likewise, histological sections showed similarity in hair follicle depths and sebaceous glands (3.2 ± 0.7 mm). These shared characteristics and the considerable fraction of bacteria which survived clinical PSPs make this model useful for developmental work.

A novel device for preoperative skin preparation to reduce the risk of injury and surgical site infection during lower limb surgery

Surgical site infection (SSI) continues to be a feared complication of surgery but especially orthopaedic surgery where a superficial SSI has been estimated to add nine days to the hospital stay and an average of £2500 to the cost. Despite the efficacy of all skin preparation agents being maximal at around 10 minutes no current system, apart from the double prep method attributed to Sir John Charnley, allows adequate control of bacteria. Current techniques of skin preparation require lifting of the limb with an associated risk of injury to theatre operatives. In order to provide for longer duration of contact, potentially better antisepsis and to remove the dangers inherent in lifting the limb we developed a novel system for limb antisepsis prior to surgery. To demonstrate efficacy we performed a single blind randomised controlled trial powered to demonstrate non-inferiority. We demonstrated a significant benefit of the device in terms of bactericidal effect. Whilst only recently entering full production, we would recommend the system as a significant improvement over current techniques of limb antisepsis.

Injections through skin colonized with Staphylococcus aureus biofilm introduce contamination despite standard antimicrobial preparation procedures

While surgical site preparation has been extensively studied, there is little information about resistance of skin microbiota in the biofilm form to antimicrobial decontamination, and there are no quantitative models to study how biofilm might be transferred into sterile tissue/implant materials during injections for joint spine and tendon, aspiration biopsies and dermal fillers (DF). In this work, we develop two in vitro models to simulate the process of skin preparation and DF injection using pig skin and SimSkin (silicone) materials, respectively. Using the pig skin model, we tested three of the most common skin preparation wipes (alcohol, chlorhexidine and povidone iodine) and found that during wiping they reduced the biofilm bacterial burden of S. aureus (CFU cm-2) by three logs with no statistically significant differences between wipes. Using the SimSkin model, we found that transfer of viable bacteria increased with needle diameter for 30G, 25G and 18G needles. Transfer incidence decreased as injection depth was increased from 1 mm to 3 mm. Serial puncture and linear threading injection styles had similar transfer incidence, whereas fanning significantly increased transfer incidence. The results show that contamination of DF during injection is a risk that can be reduced by modifying skin prep and injection practices.

Impact of 4% chlorhexidine whole-body washing on multidrug-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii skin colonisation among patients in a medical intensive care unit

The prevalence of skin colonisation with Acinetobacter baumannii (ACBA) on admission to the medical intensive care unit (MICU) was studied in an institution endemic for ACBA bloodstream infections (BSIs). The impact of 4% chlorhexidine gluconate (4% CG) whole-body washing on the patients' ACBA skin colonisation was also determined. A prospective cohort trial in a MICU during March 2002 to December 2003 was performed, with a comparison between the prevalence and incidence of ACBA-BSIs obtained after intervention and retrospectively. During the intervention period, ACBA skin-screening swabs were taken from all patients on admission and periodically until discharge. Patients underwent whole-body disinfection with 4% CG immediately after obtaining the initial cultures. Disinfection was carried out on a daily basis until discharge, regardless of colonisation status. Of the 320 patients at ward admission, 55 (17%) yielded ACBA. The prevalence of ACBA colonisation among the remaining MICU patients was 5.5% at 24h and 1% at 48h following the disinfection regimen (P=0.002, OR: 2.4). Following a second screen, 80% of colonised patients were decolonised. Prevalence of ACBA-BSIs decreased from 4.6 to 0.6 per 100 patients (P < or = 0.001; OR: 7.6) and incidence decreased from 7.8 to 1.25 (85% reduction). We conclude that daily whole-body disinfection with 4% CG significantly reduced ACBA skin colonisation. This regimen may be considered in addition to well-known infection control measures, particularly in institutions with endemic rates of multidrug-resistant ACBA-BSIs.

Does shaving the incision site increase the infection rate after spinal surgery?

STUDY DESIGN

A prospective randomized clinical study.

OBJECTIVE

To determine whether shaving the incision site before spinal surgery causes postsurgical infection.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Spine surgeons usually shave the skin of the incision site immediately before surgery is performed. However, evidence from some surgical series suggests that presurgical shaving may increase the postsurgical infection rate. To our knowledge, no previously published studies have addressed this issue.

METHODS

A total of 789 patients scheduled to undergo spinal surgery were randomly allocated into 2 groups: those in whom the site of operation was shaved immediately before surgery (shaved group; 371 patients) and the patients in whom presurgical shaving was not performed (unshaved group; 418 patients). The mean duration of anesthesia and the infection rates in both groups were recorded and compared.

RESULTS

The duration of anesthesia did not differ in the 2 groups (P > 0.05). A postoperative infection developed in 4 patients in the shaved group and in 1 patient in the nonshaved group (P < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

The shaving of the incision site immediately before spinal surgery may increase the rate of postoperative infection.

Bandages, dressings, and cranial neurosurgery

OBJECT

Bandages and dressings are commonly applied to incisional scalp wounds to prevent complications, particularly infection, during the early stages of wound healing. Bandaging cranial incisional wounds requires resources, consumes healthcare workers' time, and incurs expense; it is therefore important to examine its efficacy.

METHODS

All cranial operations (excluding shunt placements, procedures on the scalp alone, and bur hole procedures) performed between June 30, 2001 and January 1, 2006, by two neurosurgeons at either of two hospitals, one adult and one pediatric institution, were reviewed. Surgical site infections (SSIs) and other postoperative complications were investigated with respect to the use of bandaging for incisional wounds and other aspects of postoperative wound management. The operations were classified into four categories based on wound type: "clean," "clean-contaminated," "contaminated," and "dirty," according to the criteria of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

CONCLUSIONS

A total of 702 operations were performed in 577 patients; only five patients received any type of surgical bandaging. There were four SSIs (0.57%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.16-1.45). The postoperative infection rate in the 626 clean cases was 0.48% (95% CI 0.10-1.39) and was 2.63% (95% CI 0.07-13.81) in the 38 clean-contaminated cases. The data obtained in this investigation is consistent with the position that bandaging incisional scalp wounds after cranial surgery adds little if any benefit beyond the easier, simpler, and cheaper practice of using antibiotic ointment as a dressing without bandaging.

Craniotomia sem tricotomia: avaliação de 640 casos

A remoção do cabelo para realização de craniotomia utilizada rotineiramente na maioria dos serviços de neurocirurgia para procedimentos cranianos diversos questionada em sua necessidade a partir da avaliação retrospectiva de 640 pacientes submetidos a cirurgias cranianas, em que foi observada uma porcentagem de infecção de ferida cirúrgica de 1,09 %, não superior àquelas com tricotomia revisadas na literatura. Nos 7 casos com infecção, 3 pacientes foram submetidos a derivações liquóricas, 3 pacientes eram vítimas de traumatismo crânio-encefálico e uma paciente substituida a craniotomia para tratamento de tumor cerebral. A técnica para preservação e manuseio do cabelo, suas vantagens e desvantagens são descritas e discutidas.

Hygiene of the skin: when is clean too clean?

Skin hygiene, particularly of the hands, is a primary mechanism for reducing contact and fecal-oral transmission of infectious agents. Widespread use of antimicrobial products has prompted concern about emergence of resistance to antiseptics and damage to the skin barrier associated with frequent washing. This article reviews evidence for the relationship between skin hygiene and infection, the effects of washing on skin integrity, and recommendations for skin care practices.

Skin hygiene and infection prevention: more of the same or different approaches?

The purpose of this article is to review research indicating a link between hand hygiene and nosocomial infections and the effects of hand care practices on skin integrity and to make recommendations for potential changes in clinical practice and for further research regarding hand hygiene practices. Despite some methodological flaws and data gaps, evidence for a causal relationship between hand hygiene and reduced transmission of infections is convincing, but frequent handwashing causes skin damage, with resultant changes in microbial flora, increased skin shedding, and risk of transmission of microorganisms, suggesting that some traditional hand hygiene practices warrant reexamination. Some recommended changes in practice include use of waterless alcohol-based products rather than detergent-based antiseptics, modifications in lengthy surgical scrub protocols, and incorporation of moisturizers into skin care regimens of health care professionals.

The effect of thorough preoperative disinfection on the incidence of postoperative mediastinitis

This study was conducted to evaluate the effectiveness of scrubbing the skin of patients scheduled to undergo elective cardiac surgery with disinfectant solutions in an attempt to reduce the incidence of the potentially fatal postoperative complication of mediastinitis. Since April 1991, we have routinely disinfected the skin of all such patients three times preoperatively. A retrospective comparison of the incidence of mediastinitis before and after April 1991 was carried out. Microbiological examinations of the anterior chest were conducted in ten patients admitted for elective operations, and in four patients admitted for emergency surgery. Specimens were obtained before each scrubbing, before the operation, and just after skin closure. There was a significant decrease in the general incidence of mediastinitis after April 1991 (P < 0.01). Microbiologically, significant decreases in colony counts were also observed after the first (P < 0.05) and second scrubbing (P < 0.05) in the ten patients specifically studied before elective surgery. No colonies grew in the postoperative specimens from any of these patients, but colony formations were observed in two of the four patients who underwent emergency surgery (P = 0.066). Thus, we conclude that our thorough disinfection method effectively achieves adequate, prolonged suppression of the skin flora, which explains the marked decrease in the incidence of mediastinitis in our hospital since its institution.

Drug management in skin surgery

Lidocaine (lignocaine) 1% with epinephrine (adrenaline) 1:200,000 (maximum dose 40mL) is the agent of choice in skin surgery. It can be used at all sites except the fingers, toes and penis, where epinephrine should be avoided. Epinephrine-induced vasoconstriction delays local anaesthetic clearance, thus prolonging its effect and, by reducing peak blood lidocaine concentrations, enables a higher maximum dose to be used. Adding epinephrine, however, introduces the possibility of a drug interaction with tricyclic antidepressants and nonselective beta-blockers. Also, injection pain is greater because of the acidic sodium metabisulphite that has to be added to prevent epinephrine oxidation. Injection pain can be reduced by buffering the solution using sodium bicarbonate. There are no drug interactions that prevent the use of plain lidocaine: injection pain is least with 0.5% solutions. Injection of large volumes of very dilute lidocaine solutions (tumescent anaesthesia) enables higher maximum doses of lidocaine to be tolerated and large areas to be anaesthetised by infiltration. Amethocaine gel is a faster acting and more effective topical anaesthetic compared with eutectic lidocaine-prilocaine cream, but is a topical sensitiser. In high risk patients, prophylactic antibiotics should be given to prevent bacterial endocarditis when operating on infected lesions and on potentially colonised crusted lesions in high-risk patients (i.e. those with prosthetic heart valves). Wound infections following surgery on infected skin lesions can be prevented by the prophylactic use of mupirocin ointment. Aspirin-induced inhibition of platelet adhesion results in bleeding complications in approximately 15% of skin surgery patients receiving aspirin. Patients whose bleeding time is > 8 minutes are particularly at risk, and aspirin should be stopped at least 7 days prior to surgery in these patients. Aspirin can be continued in other patients without serious bleeding complications.

Preoperative hair removal: a case report with implications for nursing

Preoperative hair removal has been a practice since the beginning of this century. Research in the 1970s and 1980s provide support for the contention that the procedure is unnecessary for wound asepsis and may increase the rate of surgical site infections (Seropian & Reynolds, 1971; Hamilton et al., 1977; Cruse & Foord, 1980; Court-Brown, 1981; Alexander et al., 1983; Winfield, 1986; Fairclough et al., 1987). However, some hospitals have continued routine preoperative hair removal long after dissemination of recommendations against it. This begs the question, 'Why is it that so often research findings are not applied in practice'. In Stroud v. General Hospital Corp. and Pollett (1993), a man died of sepsis resulting from cuts he gave himself after he was asked by a nurse, in complete violation of the hospital's preoperative skin preparation protocol, to clip hair from his abdomen. The court held the hospital liable for the nurse's negligent breach of its protocol. The case clearly supports findings in the literature that preoperative hair removal is potentially dangerous. It reinforces the importance of strict adherence to hospital protocols which have been put in place to protect patients' safety.

Hair and neurosurgery

The value of removing hair in preparation for neurosurgery is addressed in detail. One neurosurgeon's series, accrued over 40 consecutive months, of 638 prospectively examined, consecutive cases is the basis of this report. The overall surgical wound infection rate was 1.1%. The infection rate for the 313 cranial cases was 0.3% and 2.8% for the 218 procedures involving cerebrospinal fluid diversion (shunts). These data are discussed in the context of extensive nonneurosurgical and microbiological literature. It is concluded that the removal of hair by shaving does not lower the risk of surgical wound infection and may increase the risk. A technique for preparing skin and hair for neurosurgery and for the management of hair during neurosurgical procedures is discussed.