Vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis (TBE): influence of simultaneous application of TBE immunoglobulin on seroconversion and rate of adverse events

The expanding role of therapeutic antibodies

Therapeutic antibodies have been used since the end of nineteenth century, but their use is progressively increased and recently, with the availability of monoclonal antibodies, they are successfully employed in a large disease spectrum, which transversally covers different fields of medicine. Hyperimmune polyclonal immune globulin has been used against infectious diseases, in a period in which anti-microbial drugs were not yet available, and it still maintains a relevant place in prophylaxis/therapy. Although immune globulin should be considered life-saving as replacement therapy in humoral immunodeficiencies, its place in the immune-modulating treatment is not usually first-choice, but it should be considered as support to standard approved treatments. Despite therapeutic monoclonal antibodies have been lastly introduced in therapy, their extreme potentiality is reflected by the large number of approved molecules, addressed toward different immunological targets and able to heavily influence the prognosis and quality of life of a wide range of different diseases.

Tick-borne encephalitis virus-neutralizing antibodies in different immunoglobulin preparations

Patients with primary immunodeficiency (PIDs) depend on the presence of a variety of antibody specificities in intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG). Using the tick-borne encephalitis virus (TBEV), geographic variability in IVIG antibody content was shown. Care should therefore be exercised when treating PIDs in a given geography, as only locally sourced plasma contains the antibody specificities against the circulating pathogens in the given locality.

Vaccines for preventing tick-borne encephalitis

BACKGROUND

Tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) is a disease of the central nervous system caused by a tick-borne viral infection. TBE can lead to severe neurological syndromes such as meningitis, meningoencephalitis, and meningoencephalomyelitis, which can result in death. There is no treatment, and prevention with the vaccine is the only intervention currently available.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate vaccines for preventing TBE in terms of effectiveness and adverse effects.

SEARCH STRATEGY

In June 2008, we searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group Specialized Register, CENTRAL (The Cochrane Library 2008, Issue 2), MEDLINE, EMBASE, LILACS, and mRCT. We also checked reference lists of articles.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomized and quasi-randomized controlled trials comparing TBE vaccines against placebo, control vaccines, no intervention, or a different dose or schedule of the intervention vaccine.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two authors applied the inclusion criteria, extracted data, and assessed each trial's risk of bias. We could not combine the included trials in a meta-analysis because of differences in comparisons and outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Eleven trials (corresponding to 10 papers) involving 8184 participants (6586 adults and 1598 children) were included. Different versions of three types of TBE vaccines were tested (IPVE, FSME-IMMUN, and Encepur); out of which only three (Encepur children, Encepur Adults, and FSME-IMMUN "new") are currently licensed. No trials reported on cases of clinical TBE, but all reported on antibody titre (seroconversion). All the vaccines gave seroconversion rates of over 87%. Systemic and local adverse effects were common; none were severe or life threatening.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

Tick-borne encephalitis vaccines appear to be highly immunogenic, but the relationship between seroconversion and clinical protection has not been established. Although adverse effects were commonly reported, none were serious or life threatening.

Cost-benefit analysis of vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis among French troops

BACKGROUND

French troops are exposed to tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) during their tours of duty in the Balkans. This disease, potentially serious because of its lethality and morbidity, has an effective vaccination. The epidemiological characteristics of TBE in the Balkans are not well known.

OBJECTIVE

In order to provide the French Department of Defence with arguments on the utility of vaccinating troops on missions in this area of Europe, we conducted a cost-benefit study.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Through a decision analysis, we estimated the net benefit of a three-injection vaccination programme for all French military personnel in the Balkans versus no vaccination during a period from 2004 to 2014. We used a review of the literature to estimate the parameters necessary for the present study: the disease's morbidity and death incidence rate; the disease's sequelae; and the adverse effects of the vaccination. The initial hypothesis of the seroconversion rate of TBE in the Balkans was 834 per 100,000 person-years. Human life was valued in Euro (year 2004 values) by calculating the amounts paid by the French Department of Defence to military personnel in case of disabling sequelae and to their heirs in case of death.

MAIN RESULTS

The net benefit was negative: -5.68 million Euro. The vaccination programme's cost was 10.05 million Euro. 121 cases of TBE could be prevented by this vaccination; however, the sensitivity analysis showed that the results are closely related to the incidence of the disease.

CONCLUSION

Very high incidence rates of TBE were initially hypothesised compared with what has actually been reported. As a result, the vaccination programme against TBE for French military personnel should not be implemented unless the objective of the armed forces is to prevent all cases of TBE and they are willing to assume the cost of doing so.

Passive immunity in prevention and treatment of infectious diseases

Antibodies have been used for over a century in the prevention and treatment of infectious disease. They are used most commonly for the prevention of measles, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, tetanus, varicella, rabies, and vaccinia. Although their use in the treatment of bacterial infection has largely been supplanted by antibiotics, antibodies remain a critical component of the treatment of diptheria, tetanus, and botulism. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin can be used to treat certain viral infections in immunocompromised patients (e.g., cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19, and enterovirus infections). Antibodies may also be of value in toxic shock syndrome, Ebola virus, and refractory staphylococcal infections. Palivizumab, the first monoclonal antibody licensed (in 1998) for an infectious disease, can prevent respiratory syncytial virus infection in high-risk infants. The development and use of additional monoclonal antibodies to key epitopes of microbial pathogens may further define protective humoral responses and lead to new approaches for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases.

Passive immunity in prevention and treatment of infectious diseases

Antibodies have been used for over a century in the prevention and treatment of infectious disease. They are used most commonly for the prevention of measles, hepatitis A, hepatitis B, tetanus, varicella, rabies, and vaccinia. Although their use in the treatment of bacterial infection has largely been supplanted by antibiotics, antibodies remain a critical component of the treatment of diptheria, tetanus, and botulism. High-dose intravenous immunoglobulin can be used to treat certain viral infections in immunocompromised patients (e.g., cytomegalovirus, parvovirus B19, and enterovirus infections). Antibodies may also be of value in toxic shock syndrome, Ebola virus, and refractory staphylococcal infections. Palivizumab, the first monoclonal antibody licensed (in 1998) for an infectious disease, can prevent respiratory syncytial virus infection in high-risk infants. The development and use of additional monoclonal antibodies to key epitopes of microbial pathogens may further define protective humoral responses and lead to new approaches for the prevention and treatment of infectious diseases.

Vaccines for preventing tick-borne encephalitis

BACKGROUND

Tick-borne encephalitis is a disease of the central nervous system caused by a virus. Other than the vaccine, there is no treatment for the disease.

OBJECTIVES

The objective of this review was to assess the effects of vaccines to prevent tick-borne encephalitis.

SEARCH STRATEGY

We searched the Cochrane Infectious Diseases Group trials register, the Cochrane Vaccine Fields Trials Register, the Cochrane Controlled Trials Register, Medline, Embase and reference lists of articles. We also handsearched the journal Vaccine.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised and quasi-randomised trials comparing tick-borne encephalitis vaccines against placebo, control vaccines or comparisons of different doses or schedules of tick-borne encephalitis vaccines.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two reviewers independently applied inclusion criteria. A panel of six assessors examined trial quality.

MAIN RESULTS

Five trials were included. They could not be combined for meta-analysis because of differences in comparisons and outcomes. Four types of tick-borne encephalitis vaccines were used. All the vaccines gave seroconversion rates of over 87%. There were frequent reports of systemic and local adverse effects.

REVIEWER'S CONCLUSIONS

Tick-borne encephalitis vaccines appear to be highly immunogenic, but the relationship between seroconversion and clinical protection has not been established. Although adverse effects were commonly reported, none were severe or life threatening.

Vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis under therapeutic immunosuppression. Reduced efficacy in heart transplant recipients

Patients after organ transplantation are at an increased risk of microbial infections and might benefit from active vaccination. Due to therapeutic immunosuppression the efficacy of immunizations is, however, reduced and difficult to predict. Efficacy of vaccination against tick-borne encephalitis (TBE) using an abbreviated immunization schedule was compared in 31 heart transplant recipients (age: 54.5 +/- 11.5 years, mean time after transplantation: 53.5 +/- 23.7 months) under cyclosporine-based immunosuppression and 29 controls. TBE vaccination was well tolerated by the transplant recipients; spectrum and frequency of adverse events were similar to controls. In the transplant patients, seroconversion rate (35% versus 100%; p < 0.001) and the geometric mean of post-vaccinal antibody titres (0.98 (SF: 2.3) U/ml versus 5.46 (2.2) U/ml; p < 0.001) were markedly reduced in comparison to the control group. No clinical or demographic predictors of vaccination success could be established in the transplant patients. Due to the limited efficacy, TBE vaccination cannot be recommended as a routine procedure in heart transplant recipients at risk of TBE virus infection. TBE vaccination may be performed safely in selected cases, but repeated titre controls to confirm vaccination success would be required.