Cholinergic agonist and antagonist interactions on motor nerve endings of the rat--evidence for the involvement of presynaptic receptors in the regulation of acetylcholine release

Role of presynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors in the regulation of gastrointestinal motility

Presynaptic nicotinic acetylcholine receptors (nAChRs) located on cholinergic terminals facilitate the release of acetylcholine (ACh), thereby constituting a fail-safe mechanism at strategic locations, such as the neuromuscular junction, where reliable transmission is vital. Accumulating data indicate that myenteric neurons in the enteric nervous system possess not only somatodendritic nAChRs, which mediate cholinergic transmission between neurons, but also presynaptic nAChRs. Functional evidence shows that these receptors mediate a positive feedback with respect to ACh release from myenteric motoneurons, and might therefore play an important role in the regulation of gastrointestinal motility. These presynaptic nAChRs were found to be more sensitive to nicotinic ligands than somatodendritic nAChRs and could therefore be primary targets of exogenous compounds, such as nicotine. This interaction might provide a neurochemical basis for the effect of smoking on gastrointestinal motility. Another important human pharmacological implication is based on our recent observation that monoamine uptake inhibitor-type antidepressant drugs are able to inhibit presynaptic nAChRs in the enteric nervous system. The disruption of the nAChR-mediated positive feedback modulation by antidepressants might explain the frequent occurrence of constipation, a common side effect, attributed to these drugs. Clarification of the role of presynaptic nAChRs in feedback mechanisms in the enteric nervous system might be instrumental in the development of new drugs affecting gastrointestinal motility.

Stereoselective increase in cholinergic transmission by R-(+)-hyoscyamine

R-(+)-hyoscyamine, the dextro enantiomer of atropine, has been shown to amplify cholinergic transmission. R-(+)-hyoscyamine, unlike S-(-)-hyoscyamine, was able to increase acetylcholine release both in vitro and in vivo at a range of concentrations (10(-14) to 10(-12) M) and doses (5 microg/kg i.p.) which were inadequate for blocking muscarinic receptors. The increase over control values in ACh release was 15.9 +/- 2.1% in in vitro experiments performed in rat phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm preparations (n = 6), and 63.3 + 16.3% in cortical microdialysis performed in free-moving rats (n = 5). The maximum ACh release was reached 60 min after R-(+)-hyoscyamine administration in in vivo experiments. At the same doses and concentrations, R-(+)-hyoscyamine was also able to elicit: antinociception of a cholinergic type (55.6-112.7% depending on the test used); complete prevention of scopolamine- and dicyclomine-induced amnesia; potentiation of muscular contractions electrically evoked in isolated guinea-pig ileum (16.7 +/- 3.6%) and in rat phrenic nerve-hemidiaphragm (19.9 +/- 3.2%) preparations. Antinociception was performed using the hot-plate and acetic acid abdominal constriction tests in mice, and the paw pressure test in rats, while prevention of induced amnesia was evaluated in mice using the passive-avoidance test. The respective affinities (pA2) for R-(+)- and S-(-)-hyoscyamine vs M1 (rabbit vas deferens), M2 (rat atrium) and M3 (rat ileum) receptor subtypes were as follows: 7.05 +/- 0.05/9.33 +/- 0.03 for M1; 7.25 +/- 0.04/8.95 +/- 0.01 for M2; 6.88 +/- 0.05/9.04 +/- 0.03 for M3. The respective pKi values for R-(+)- and S-(-)-hyoscyamine vs the five human muscarinic receptor subtypes expressed in Chinese hamster oocytes (CHO-K1) were as follows: 8.21 +/- 0.07/9.48 +/- 0.18 for m1; 7.89 +/- 0.06/9.45 +/- 0.31 for m2; 8.06 +/- 0.18/9.30 +/- 0.19 for m3; 8.35 +/- 0.11/9.55 +/- 0.13 for m4; 8.17 +/- 0.08/9.24 +/- 0.30 for m5.

Neuromuscular facilitation induced by muscarinic antagonists in the rat isolated diaphragm

1. Atropine (EC50 = 87 microM), pirenzepine (447 microM), and AF-DX 116 (95.5 microM), but not 4-DAMP (at concentrations of up to 110 microM), produced neuromuscular facilitation and antagonized the oxotremorine-induced neuromuscular blockade in the rat isolated diaphragm. 2. Atropine, pirenzepine, and AF-DX 116 did not change the responses of curarized diaphragms to direct stimulation, or the twitch tension produced by retrograde injection of acetylcholine. 3. These results indicate that neuromuscular facilitation induced by muscarinic antagonists may depend on drug interaction with the M2 subtype of muscarinic autoreceptors to increase acetylcholine output in the neuromuscular junction.

Muscarinic modulation of neurotransmission: the effects of some agonists and antagonists

1. Functional studies were performed to evaluate the effects of some muscarinic agents at the neuromuscular junction of the mouse. 2. The presynaptic control of acetylcholine release and the postsynaptic activation of the nicotinic receptor have been analyzed by means of extracellular recording. The amplitude of spontaneous and of evoked acetylcholine release, the frequency of spontaneous acetylcholine release and the time course of the quantal release have been measured by means of an EPC7 patch clamp amplifier. 3. This electrophysiological method revealed multiple dose-related effects of some agonists and antagonists on the above parameters. Concentration-response curves related to the parameters underlying the function of this cholinergic synapse were obtained and the apparent EC50 values calculated. 4. Many of the interactions of the agonists and antagonists could inhibit neuromuscular transmission. The rank order potencies related to the inhibition of the evoked signals were carbachol > oxotremorine > d,l-muscarine for the agonists and methoctramine > 4-DAMP > l-hyoscyamine > AFDX-116 > ipratropium > pirenzepine for the antagonists. 5. These findings suggest a more complicated pattern related to the muscarinic action at the mouse neuromuscular junction with the involvement of some post-synaptic located sites.

Effects of atropine, pirenzepine, imipramine and phenothiazines on the mammalian neuromuscular junction

1. Trifluoperazine (EC50 = 11.5 nM), chlorpromazine (13.8 microM), imipramine (15 microM), atropine (75.8 microM), and pirenzepine (316.2 microM), all produced neuromuscular facilitation and antagonized the blockade produced by oxotremorine (20 and 30 microM) in the rat isolated diaphragm. 2. These antagonists did not change the responses of curarized diaphragms to direct stimulation, or the twitch tension produced by retrograde injection of acetylcholine. 3. Trifluoperazine (2.5 ng, intra-arterially) reduced the tetanic fade produced by further intra-arterial injection of d-tubocurarine (10 micrograms/kg) in the in situ cat tibial muscle. 4. These results indicate that these antagonists may interact with muscarinic autoreceptors to increase acetylcholine output in the neuromuscular junction.

Computerized estimation of spontaneous and evoked acetylcholine release at the neuromuscular junction

A new and automated on-line analysis of the parameters related to the neuromuscular activity is shown. The procedure used to obtain in real time the statistical evaluation of the recorded electrical signals is presented and discussed. The hardware is composed of a PDP-11/73 microcomputer equipped with an analog input/output board. The software is written principally in FORTRAN 77 and also uses MACRO/ASSEMBLY language.