Definitive radiotherapy following prostatectomy: results and complications

Dual-timing PSA as a biomarker for patients with salvage intensity modulated radiation therapy for biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy

We investigated the outcomes and the associated clinical-pathological factors in patients with prostate cancer (PCa) undergoing salvage intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for post-radical-prostatectomy (RP) biochemical failure. We report clinical outcomes of post-RP salvage IMRT, and describe chronic toxicity in these patients.Fifty patients with PCa underwent post-RP salvage IMRT. The median dose of IMRT was 70 Gy to the prostatic and seminal vesicle bed. Clinical-pathological and toxicity information were collected. The prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), disease-free survival (DFS), and biochemical-failure-free survival (BFFS) were calculated. Prognostic factors were analyzed for their association with disease control.The median follow-up time was 74 months. The 5-year PCSS, DFS, and BFFS after salvage IMRT were 95%, 88%, and 60%, respectively. Two patients (4%) experienced late gastrointestinal toxicity ≥ grade 3, and 5 patients (10%) had late genitourinary toxicity ≥ grade 3. On multivariate analysis, post-RP prostate-specific antigen (PSA) nadir ≤0.1 ng/ml (P=0.018) and PSA ≤0.5 ng/ml at salvage IMRT (P=0.016) were independent factors predicting better BFFS. Patients with both post-RP PSA nadir ≤0.1 ng/ml and PSA ≤0.5 ng/ml at salvage IMRT had a 5-year BFFS of 83% as compared with 43% in other patients (P=0.001).In conclusion, with hormonal therapy in most PCa patients, the addition of salvage IMRT for post-RP biochemical failure can achieve a good outcome with low toxicity. Patients with a post-RP PSA nadir ≤0.1 ng/ml and PSA ≤0.5 ng/ml at salvage IMRT could benefit the most from salvage IMRT.

Management of the complications of radical prostatectomy

Over the past several years, the morbidity associated with radical prostatectomy has improved due to advances in surgical technique, better understanding of male pelvic anatomy, and improved perioperative care. Despite these advances, patients are still at risk for several complications both intraoperatively and in the postoperative course. These risks include significant blood loss, rectal injury, ureteral injury, thromboembolic events, urinary incontinence, impotence, and a perioperative death rate of less than 1%. These risks should be reviewed and discussed before treating the patient with prostate cancer.

Salvage conformal radiotherapy for biochemical recurrent prostate cancer after radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVE

Assess the results of salvage conformal radiotherapy in patients with biochemical failure after radical prostatectomy and identify prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence and toxicity of the treatment.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From June 1998 to November 2001, 35 patients were submitted to conformal radiotherapy for PSA > or = 0.2 ng/mL in progression after radical prostatectomy and were retrospectively analyzed. The mean dose of radiation in prostatic bed was of 77.4 Gy (68-81). Variables related to the treatment and to tumor were assessed to identify prognostic factors for biochemical recurrence after salvage radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was of 55 months (17-83). The actuarial survival rates free of biochemical recurrence and free of metastasis at a distance of 5 years were 79.7% e 84.7%, respectively. The actuarial global survival rate in 5 years was 96.1%. The actuarial survival rate free of biochemical recurrence in 5 years was 83.3% with PSA pre-radiotherapy < or = 1, 100% when > 1 and < or = 2, and 57.1% when > 2 (p = 0.023). Dose > 70 Gy in 30% of the bladder volume implied in more acute urinary toxicity (p = 0.035). The mean time for the development of late urinary toxicity was 21 months (12-51). Dose > 55 Gy in 50%bladder volume implied in more late urinary toxicity (p = 0.018). A patient presented late rectal toxicity of 2nd grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Conformal radiotherapy showed to be effective for the control of biochemical recurrence after radical prostatectomy. Patients with pre-therapy PSA < or = 2 ng/mL have more biochemical control.

Postoperative radiotherapy after prostatectomy--a review

PURPOSE

The management of prostate adenocarcinomas using postoperative irradiation is a controversial question. The purpose of this study was to review the literature on the subject.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 417 articles dealing with postoperative radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy in English literature (1990-2002) were reviewed in aspects of effect on survival, time of irradiation, risk factors, dose and technique and side effects.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

No randomised studies have been performed and therefore no definitive conclusive data can be made concerning the efficiency of the concept. However, postoperative radiotherapy appears to increase local control preferably in pT3/4 prostatic carcinomas with seminal vesicles involvement and/or positive margins and/or high Gleason score and high postoperative PSA level. It has not been shown to improve survival. Severe side effects are reported in a low frequency. However, postoperative irradiation can cause severe side effects and postoperative adjuvant/salvage treatments should be delivered earliest 3-6 months after surgery and the total dose delivered to the prostate bed should be 65-70 Gy. Postoperative radiotherapy induces improved local control in patients with positive surgical margins and in patients with a local relapse, preferably if the tumour is small (i.e. PSA <1-2 ng/mL).

Significant correlation between rectal DVH and late bleeding in patients treated after radical prostatectomy with conformal or conventional radiotherapy (66.6-70.2 Gy)

PURPOSE

Investigating the correlation between dosimetric/clinical parameters and late rectal bleeding in patients treated with adjuvant or salvage radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data of 154 consecutive patients, including three-dimensional treatment planning and dose-volume histograms (DVHs) of the rectum (including filling), were retrospectively analyzed. Twenty-six of 154 patients presenting a (full) rectal volume >100 cc were excluded from the analysis. All patients considered for the analysis (n = 128) were treated at a nominal dose equal to 66.6-70.2 Gy (ICRU dose 68-72.5 Gy; median 70 Gy) with conformal (n = 76) or conventional (n = 52) four-field technique (1.8 Gy/fr). Clinical parameters such as diabetes mellitus, acute rectal bleeding, hypertension, age, and hormonal therapy were considered. Late rectal bleeding was scored using a modified Radiation Therapy Oncology Group scale, and patients experiencing >or=Grade 2 were considered bleeders. Median follow-up was 36 months (range 12-72). Mean and median rectal dose were considered, together with rectal volume and the % fraction of rectum receiving more than 50, 55, 60, and 65 Gy (V50, V55, V60, V65, respectively). Median and quartile values of all parameters were taken as cutoff for statistical analysis. Univariate (log-rank) and multivariate (Cox hazard model) analyses were performed.

RESULTS

Fourteen of 128 patients experienced >or=Grade 2 late bleeding (3-year actuarial incidence 10.5%). A significant correlation between a number of cutoff values and late rectal bleeding was found. In particular, a mean dose >or=54 Gy, V50 >or=63%, V55 >or=57%, and V60 >or=50% was highly predictive of late bleeding (p <or= 0.01). A rectal volume <60 cc and type of treatment (conventional vs. conformal) were also significantly predictive of late bleeding (p = 0.05). Concerning clinical variables, acute bleeding (p < 0.001) was significantly related to late bleeding, and a trend was found for hypertension (p = 0.11). After patients were grouped into those with V50 >or=63% and those with V50 <63% (DVH grouping), data were fitted with a Cox regression hazard model using DVH grouping, rectal volume, and the main clinical parameters as independent variables. Results of the analysis showed that DVH grouping (relative risk 3.3; p = 0.04) and acute bleeding (relative risk 7.1; p = 0.001) are independently predictive of late bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

DVHs of the rectum are significantly correlated with late bleeding for patients irradiated at 66.6-70.2 Gy after radical prostatectomy.

Predictors of biochemical outcome with salvage conformal radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

To identify predictors of biochemical outcome following radiotherapy in patients with a rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred fifteen patients with a rising PSA after radical prostatectomy received salvage three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) alone or with neoadjuvant androgen deprivation. Tumor-related and treatment-related factors were evaluated to identify predictors of subsequent PSA failure.

RESULTS

The median follow-up time after 3D-CRT was 42 months. The 4-year actuarial PSA relapse-free survival, distant metastasis-free survival, and overall survival rates were 46%, 83%, and 95%, respectively. Multivariate analysis, which was limited to 70 patients receiving radiation without androgen deprivation therapy, showed that negative/close margins (P =.03), absence of extracapsular extension (P <.01), and presence of seminal vesicle invasion (P <.01) were independent predictors of PSA relapse after radiotherapy. Neoadjuvant androgen deprivation did not improve the 4-year PSA relapse-free survival in patients with positive margins, extracapsular extension, and no seminal vesicle invasion (P =.24). However, neoadjuvant androgen deprivation did improve PSA relapse-free survival when one or more of these variables were absent (P =.03).

CONCLUSIONS

Salvage 3D-CRT can provide biochemical control in selected patients with a rising PSA after radical prostatectomy. Among patients with positive margins and no poor prognostic features, 77% achieved PSA control after salvage 3D-CRT. Salvage neoadjuvant androgen deprivation therapy may improve short-term biochemical control, but it requires further study.

Positive resection margin and/or pathologic T3 adenocarcinoma of prostate with undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen after radical prostatectomy: to irradiate or not?

PURPOSE

To evaluate the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for positive resection margin and/or pathologic T3 (pT3) adenocarcinoma of the prostate with undetectable postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively analyzed 125 patients with a positive resection margin and/or pT3 adenocarcinoma of the prostate who had undetectable postoperative serum PSA levels after radical prostatectomy. Seventy-three patients received postoperative adjuvant RT and 52 did not. Follow-up ranged from 1.5 to 12.0 years (median 4.2 for the irradiated group and 4.9 for the nonirradiated group). PSA outcome was available for all patients. Freedom from failure was defined as the maintenance of a serum PSA level of < or =0.2 ng/mL, as well as the absence of clinical local recurrence and distant metastasis.

RESULTS

No difference was found in the 5-year actuarial overall survival between the irradiated and nonirradiated group (94% vs. 95%). However, patients receiving adjuvant RT had a statistically superior 5-year actuarial relapse-free rate, including freedom from PSA failure, compared with those treated with surgery alone (88% vs. 65%, p = 0.0013). In the irradiated group, 8 patients had relapse with PSA failure alone. None had local or distant recurrence. In the nonirradiated group, 15, 1, and 2 had PSA failure, local recurrence, and distant metastasis, respectively. On Cox regression analysis, pre-radical prostatectomy PSA level and adjuvant RT were statistically significant predictive factors for relapse, and Gleason score, extracapsular invasion, and resection margin status were not. There was a suggestion that seminal vesicle invasion was associated with an increased risk of relapse. The morbidity of postoperative adjuvant RT was acceptable, with only 2 patients developing Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 3 genitourinary complications. Adjuvant RT had a minimal adverse effect on urinary continence and did not cause serious gastrointestinal toxicity.

CONCLUSION

Postoperative adjuvant RT was associated with a lower risk of relapse, including freedom from PSA failure, compared with observation alone for pT3 and/or margin-positive disease with undetectable postoperative PSA levels. This was accomplished with a minimal risk of serious RT morbidity.

The role of radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy

The results of radiotherapy (RT) as used at the Mayo Clinic are reviewed and compared with the available literature. An attempt is made to summarize the risks and benefits of RT in these settings. Additionally, avenues of future potential investigation are explored.

Multimodality salvage for patients with persistently elevated postprostatectomy PSA

A persistently elevated postprostatectomy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a therapeutic dilemma for which optimal management is undefined. We evaluated the salvage efficacy of whole-pelvis radiation with hormonal blockade in a subset of patients with persistently elevated postprostatectomy PSA. Within 180 days after surgery, 14 men with elevated postprostatectomy PSA (0.9-18 ng/ml; mean 4.8) and negative metastatic work-up began whole-pelvis radiation (4500 cGy / 25 fractions), which was directly followed by prostate-bed boost (2000 cGy / 10 fractions). Concomitant with radiation, 6 months of LHRH agonist was prescribed. No patients have been lost to follow-up. Chronic morbidity from radiation and hormone treatment was not noted and all 10 patients whose salvage was initiated when PSA was <5.0 ng/ml remain with undetectable PSA at follow-up (36-56 months; median 44 months). Of the four patients with PSA levels >5.0 ng/ml at salvage initiation, none remain with undetectable follow-up PSA. Postprostatectomy salvage initiated at PSA levels < or =5.0 ng/ml with the combination of whole-pelvis external-beam radiation and hormone blockade offers excellent diminishment of PSA for prolonged follow-up periods. Patients with postprostatectomy PSA of >5 ng/ml likely require salvage regimens with greater emphasis on systemic treatment. Int. J. Cancer (Radiat. Oncol. Invest.) 90, 331-335 (2000).

Preliminary results of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy as salvage treatment for a rising prostate-specific antigen level postprostatectomy

The purpose of this study is to determine the effectiveness of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy delivered to the fossa of the prostate and seminal vesicles as salvage treatment for a prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level that becomes undetectable and subsequently begins to rise postprostatectomy. Between August 1994 and December 1997, 14 patients with prostate cancer whose PSA became undetectable after a radical prostatectomy subsequently developed a rising PSA, had no evidence of metastatic disease, and were treated with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy at the University of California, Davis Cancer Center. Gleason scores ranged from 4 to 9 (29% of the patients had a Gleason score > or =8). The seminal vesicles were involved in three (21%) cases and the surgical margins were involved in seven (50%) cases. PSA values ranged from 0.3 to 6.7 (median: 0.7) ng/ml at the start of radiotherapy. Daily 1.8-2.0-Gy fractions were administered to total doses at isocenter ranging from 60.6 to 74.2 (median: 64.9) Gy. None of the patients received hormonal therapy. Follow-up ranged from 13 to 36 (median: 22) months. For patients with a preradiotherapy Hybritech PSA < or = 1.0 ng/ml, the Kaplan-Meier estimate of the 2-year biochemical disease-free survival rate is 67%, whereas for patients with a preradiotherapy PSA more than 1.0 ng/ml, the 2-year biochemical disease-free survival rate is 20% (p = 0.17). Because of the small number of patients, the difference is not statistically significant. A positive microscopic margin had no impact on the results obtained with salvage radiotherapy. Only one of four patients with a poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma remains free of disease. Acute toxicity was mild and did not require medication (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade I): four (29%) patients experienced genitourinary morbidity and three (21%) patients experienced gastrointestinal morbidity. With regard to late toxicity, one (7%) patient developed a urethral stricture requiring dilatation (Radiation Therapy Oncology Group grade III). All five patients who were potent at the start of radiotherapy remain potent. Medicare's median reimbursement for salvage three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy in this study ($7,512 in 1999 U.S. dollars) is equivalent to its reimbursement for a 17-month course of goserelin hormonal therapy. Patients with prostate cancer who develop an undetectable followed by a rising PSA postprostatectomy should be referred for salvage treatment with radiotherapy when their PSA is still less than or equal to 1.0 ng/ml. Salvage three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is well tolerated and is less expensive than more than 17 months of goserelin.

Radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy: treatment outcomes and failure patterns

OBJECTIVES

To define the optimal role for radiotherapy (RT) after radical prostatectomy (RP) and to characterize specific patterns of PSA failure in this setting.

METHODS

The records of 105 patients who underwent RT after RP (69 received therapeutic RT because of an elevated prostate-specific antigen [PSA] level, 36 received immediate adjuvant RT) were reviewed. The median follow-up was 35 months after RT and 57 months after RP. Radiation success was defined as achievement and maintenance of a PSA less than 0.2 ng/mL. Preoperative, pathologic, and postoperative characteristics were examined for their ability to predict success after RT. Patterns of PSA recurrence after RT were also examined by determining the PSA nadir, PSA velocity, and timing of androgen-deprivation therapy.

RESULTS

Of 105 patients, 47 experienced biochemical failure. Actuarial 3 and 5-year progression-free survival estimates for all patients were 55% and 43%, respectively. Significant favorable predictors of response to RT by multivariate analysis were preoperative PSA less than 20 ng/mL and the use of adjuvant RT. However, patients who received therapeutic RT with a pre-RT PSA less than 1.0 ng/mL demonstrated progression-free outcome equivalent to those who received adjuvant RT. Two distinct patterns of PSA failure were observed on the basis of PSA nadir after RT. Patients whose PSA failed to reach a nadir less than 0.2 ng/mL after RT had progression with a high PSA velocity (1.5 ng/mL/yr). Patients whose PSA reached a nadir less than 0.2 ng/mL but who subsequently had treatment failure progressed later with a lower PSA velocity (0.36 ng/ml/yr).

CONCLUSIONS

RT is effective in select patients after RP. Given the low PSA velocity consistent with persistent local disease in nearly 50% of patients in whom RT failed, more effective local therapy is needed after RP in high-risk patients.

Effect of combined transient androgen deprivation and irradiation following radical prostatectomy for prostatic cancer

PURPOSE

To evaluate whether transient androgen deprivation improves outcome in patients irradiated after radical prostatectomy for locally advanced disease, persistent or rising postoperative prostate specific antigen (PSA), or local recurrence.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Records of 105 consecutive patients who were treated with pelvic irradiation after radical retropubic prostatectomy between August 1985 and December 1995 were reviewed. Seventy-four patients received radiation alone (mean follow up: 4.6 years), and 31 received transient androgen blockade with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (4) androgen receptor blocker (1) or both (24) beginning 2 months prior to irradiation (mean follow-up 3.0 years) for a mean duration of 6 months. Two of these patients were excluded from further analysis because they received hormonal therapy for more than 1 year. Patients received a prostatic fossa dose of 60-70 Gy at 2 Gy per fraction; 48 patients also received pelvic nodal irradiation to a median dose of 50 Gy. Survival, freedom from clinical relapse (FFCR), and freedom from biochemical relapse (FFBR) were evaluated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Biochemical relapse was defined as two consecutive PSA measurements exceeding 0.07 ng/ml.

RESULTS

At 5 years after irradiation, actuarial survival for all patients was 92%, FFCR was 77%, and FFBR was 34%. FFBR was significantly better among patients who received transient androgen blockade before and during radiotherapy than among those treated with radiation alone (56 vs. 27% at 5 years, p = 0.004). FFCR was also superior for the combined treatment group (100 vs. 70% at 5 years, p = 0.014). Potential clinical prognostic factors before irradiation did not differ significantly between treatment groups, including tumor stage, summed Gleason histologic score, lymph node status, indication for treatment, and PSA levels before surgery or subsequent treatment. Multivariate analysis revealed that transient androgen deprivation was the only significant predictor for biochemical failure.

CONCLUSION

This retrospective study of irradiation after radical prostatectomy suggests that transient androgen blockade and irradiation may improve freedom from early biochemical and clinically evident relapse compared to radiotherapy alone, although more prolonged follow-up will be needed to assess durability of impact upon clinical recurrence and survival rates.

[Localized prostatic adenocarcinoma: role of pelvic radiotherapy following radical prostatectomy]

Radical prostatectomy after pelvic lymphadenectomy is an effective treatment for patients with T1-2 pN0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate. However, pathologic analysis of resected tissue reveals that in 20 to 40% of clinical stage B lesions, the tumour has extended locally beyond the prostate. This infra-clinical disease may be the origin of local relapse. Radiation oncologists are often asked to deliver post-operative irradiation. There is sufficient evidence in the literature that postoperative radiation therapy can improve local control rate for patients with pT3 pN0 adenocarcinoma of the prostate; however, the effect of this radiotherapy on survival in this category of patients remains unclear. It is the reason why randomised clinical trials have been implemented for investigating the role of pelvic external irradiation with respect to the effects on local control, acute and late morbidity, overall survival and cancer-related survival, and for better defining the selective indications of radiotherapy, regarding pathological data.

Radiation therapy after prostatectomy: now or later?

Patients with pathological stage T3 or T4 prostate cancers who have undetectable prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) have a substantial risk of recurrence. The first sign of recurrence is a rising PSA level, which precedes clinical evidence of failure by months to years. Adjuvant radiation therapy can significantly reduce the risk of failure in these patients. Patients with rising PSA levels after RRP can be salvaged with radiation therapy. Larger series report that between 30% and 54% of carefully staged patients can be salvaged with radiation therapy alone. It is possible that more patients may be salvaged in the future with the use of combined radiation therapy and hormonal therapy. Although one cannot be certain which approach-adjuvant or salvage radiation therapy- is better, studies are being performed that will help clarify this clinical dilemma.

Tolerance and early outcome results of postprostatectomy three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

PURPOSE

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) has been associated with a reduction in acute and late toxicity among patients treated for localized prostatic cancer. The purpose of this study is to assess the acute and late toxicity of 3D-CRT delivered to patients in the postprostatectomy setting and to analyze which factors predict for durable biochemical control in this group of patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1988 and 1994, 42 patients were treated after prostatectomy with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. The median time from prostatectomy to radiotherapy was 11 months. Indications for treatment included a rising serum PSA level in 28 patients (65%) and positive surgical margins without a rising PSA level in 14 (35%). Twenty-five patients (60%) had pathologic stage T3 disease, and 32 (74%) had tumor at or close to the surgical margins. The median dose was 64.8 Gy, and the median follow-up time was 2 years.

RESULTS

3D-CRT in the postprostatectomy setting was well tolerated. Three patients (7%) experienced Grade II acute genitourinary toxicity and nine patients (21%) experienced Grade II acute gastrointestinal toxicity during treatment. No patient experienced Grade III or higher acute morbidity. The 2-year actuarial risk for Grade II late genitourinary and gastrointestinal late complications were 5 and 9%, respectively. In patients with existing incontinence, the incidence of worsening stress incontinence 6 months after treatment was 17%, which resolved within 12 months to its preradiotherapy level in four of six cases (66%). The overall 2-year postirradiation PSA relapse-free survival rate was 53%. The 2-year PSA relapse-free survival was 66% for patients with undetectable PSA levels in the immediate postoperative period compared to 26% for those with detectable levels of PSA after surgery (p < 0.006). Furthermore, for patients with preradiotherapy PSA levels of < or = 1.0 ng/ml, the 2-year PSA relapse-free survival was 74% compared to 17% of those with preradiotherapy PSA levels of > 1.0 ng/ml (p < 0.002). The resection margin status, presence of seminal vesicle involvement, Gleason score, and the preprostatectomy PSA level did not impact on PSA relapse-free survival. A Cox proportional hazards regression analysis demonstrated that a preradiotherapy PSA value of > 1 ng/ml (p < 0.002) was the most important covariate predicting for a rising PSA after radiotherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

After prostatectomy, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is associated with minimal treatment-related morbidity. Patients with postprostatectomy, preradiotherapy PSA levels < or = 1.0 ng/ml, and those patients who had undetectable PSA levels in the immediate postoperative period are more likely to benefit from local adjuvant therapy.

Combined modality staging of prostate carcinoma and its utility in predicting pathologic stage and postoperative prostate specific antigen failure

OBJECTIVES

This study was performed to predict the factors that can optimize preoperative staging for clinically localized prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

Logistic and Cox regression multivariable analyses were performed on 480 surgically-managed prostate cancer patients to evaluate the ability of clinical stage, prostate specific antigen (PSA), biopsy Gleason sum, percent positive biopsies, and endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging (erMRI) results to predict for pathologic established extracapsular extension (ECE), seminal vesicle invasion (SVI), and time to postoperative PSA failure.

RESULTS

The characteristics of clinically organ-confined prostate cancer patients at high risk (> 67%) for postoperative PSA failure within 3 years include: (A) PSA > 20 ng/mL; (B) Biopsy Gleason sum > or = 8; or (C) erMRI positive for extraprostatic disease and intermediate risk disease. For patients at intermediate risk (ie, either a PSA < 4 and biopsy Gleason sum of 7; PSA > 4 to 10 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason sum 5 to 7; or a PSA > 10 to 20 ng/mL and biopsy Gleason sum 2 to 7), despite 100% positive biopsies, 50% of patients had pathologic organ-confined disease. However, in the subset of intermediate-risk patients with a positive erMRI for either ECE or SVI and at least 50% positive biopsies, all had extraprostatic disease and failed biochemically by 47 months postoperatively. Intermediate-risk patients with < 50% positive biopsies had pathologic organ-confined disease in at least 77% of the cases.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined modality staging using the PSA, biopsy Gleason sum, percent positive biopsies, and endorectal coil MRI findings in select patients can predict pathologic stage and postoperative PSA failure. Therefore, this combined modality staging may optimize patient selection for phase 3 trials examining the role of neoadjuvant androgen ablative therapy for patients with clinically localized disease.

Irradiation for locally recurrent carcinoma of the prostate following radical prostatectomy

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcome of patients treated with irradiation (RT) for isolated, clinically apparent local tumor recurrence following prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate (CaP).

METHODS

Between May 1979 and July 1992, 35 patients received external-beam RT as sole salvage therapy for post-prostatectomy locally recurrent CaP. Patient outcome was evaluated through retrospective medical record review with respect to clinical and prostate-specific antigen-based (that is, biochemical) control rates, as well as disease-free (clinical and biochemical) and overall survival estimates. Chronic RT-induced morbidity was also examined, and pre-RT disease characteristics were evaluated for their association with disease outcome.

RESULTS

With median follow-up of 5.2 years (range 1.7 to 12.1) in survivors (30 patients), 19 patients (54%) had clinical (local, 1 patient [3%]; metastatic, 7 patients [20%]) or biochemical only (11 patients [31%]) relapse. The 8-year clinical relapse-free and any relapse-free (clinical or biochemical) rates were 80% and 56%, respectively, whereas the overall survival estimate was 97%. A chronic complication(s) of treatment was noted in 15 patients (43%) but spontaneously resolved in all but 6 (17%); persistent complications were mild and associated with rectal (grade 1 to 2, 14%) and lymphatic (3%) systems. The interval between prostatectomy and local tumor recurrence, the pre-RT prostate-specific antigen serum level, the pathologic stage, and tumor differentiation may be associated with disease outcome.

CONCLUSIONS

External-beam RT resulted in excellent local tumor control without serious long-term morbidity in most patients. Although this study could not define an optimal management strategy (for example, symptomatic measures only, RT, or hormonal therapy), these results provided outcome measures, in relationship to pre-RT tumor-related factors, that may be valuable for clinical decision-making.

[Adjuvant radiotherapy after radical prostatectomy. Apropos of a series of 73 patients in Lyons (France)]

PURPOSE

Descriptive analysis of adjuvant radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From 1986 to 1993, 73 patients (median age, 64.5 years; Gleason score > or = 7 : 36 pts; T1:22; T2:40; T3:11) were included into the study. On the operative specimen, the cancer grades were pT2:5 (involvement of the apex), pT3:67, pT4:1, pN1-2:8. Radiation therapy was performed after a mean resting period of 112 days. The target volume was the prostatic area. The technique used was a four-field box with an 18 MV-X photon beam. The dose was 50 Gy/20 fractions/5 weeks. No hormonal treatment was administered, except for 5 patients for a short duration.

RESULTS

The median follow up was 46 months. One anastomotic local failure was salvaged by trans-urethral resection, three distant metastatic failures. Out of 72 patients with a PSA < 3 ng/mL at the end of radiotherapy, 13 showed an isolated elevation. The 5-year overall survival rate was 93%. The event-free survival was 72% after 5 years. Pathological differentiation and Gleason score were significantly correlated with the survival. There was no complication related to radiotherapy.

CONCLUSION

Elective adjuvant radiation therapy for pT3 prostate adenocarcinoma after radical prostatectomy provides a good local control with minimal morbidity.

Serum prostate-specific antigen elevation in the post-radical prostatectomy patient

The management of postprostatectomy serum prostate-specific antigen elevation is hampered by the inability to determine the location of the recurrence accurately and the lack of data demonstrating a survival advantage from any of the available therapies. Treatment must be individualized for each patient.

Delayed/salvage radiation therapy in patients with elevated prostate specific antigen levels after radical prostatectomy. A long term follow-up

BACKGROUND

In this article the authors report an analysis and long term results of delayed/salvage radiation therapy administered to asymptomatic patients who had an elevated prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, many months to many years after radical prostatectomy.

METHODS

During 1987 to 1990, 40 asymptomatic patients were found to have an elevated PSA level 9 to 96 months after radical prostatectomy. The patients underwent transrectal needle aspiration biopsy of the urethrovesicle junction anastomosis (uvj); 28 patients had a positive biopsy and 12 patients had a negative biopsy. Delayed/salvage radiation therapy was administered to the pelvis (45 Gray [Gy]) and prostate bed (59.5 Gy), including the uvj.

RESULTS

Twenty-four of 37 patients (65%) were free of clinical disease. In 10 patients (27%), the radiation therapy resulted in a durable decrease in the elevated PSA level below a detectable level for a minimum 5-year follow-up. Five patients were alive with clinical disease. Eight died of disease. Three patients were lost to follow-up.

CONCLUSIONS

This experience shows that delayed/salvage radiation therapy to the pelvis (45 Gy) and prostate bed (59.5 Gy), even many years after radical prostatectomy for pathologic stage pB, pC, and pD1 carcinoma of the prostate, was well tolerated and provided freedom from clinical disease in 24 of 37 patients (65%), and a decrease in elevated PSA level in 10 patients (27%). Delayed/salvage radiation therapy appears to be beneficial for patients who had undergone radical prostatectomy only and then developed rising PSA levels during the follow-up period.

What is the optimal patient selection for combined androgen ablative and radiation therapy? The role of combined modality staging

The 5-year results of neoadjuvant androgen suppression and external beam radiation therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer show a benefit in local, distant, and biochemical control when compared with external beam radiation therapy alone. Further follow-up will ascertain if these findings translate into a survival benefit. Combined modality staging is a methodology in which all of the pretreatment clinical factors that are found to have independent prognostic significance on multivariable analysis for predicting a given outcome (for example, pathologic stage) are used to determine the initial management. This method of staging is able to provide an optimized assessment of the pathologic extent of local disease prior to management, and therefore it is better able to define those patients in whom local-only therapy is likely to be curative. Knowing more reliably the pathologic extent of disease prior to therapy also provides a rationale for patient selection in clinical trials that are currently testing the impact on overall survival of combining androgen suppression and external beam radiation therapy for early stage (T1b-T2b) prostate cancer.

An analysis of the time course of postoperative prostate-specific antigen failure in patients with positive surgical margins: implications on the use of adjuvant therapy

OBJECTIVES

The role of adjuvant therapy in the postprostatectomy setting for positive margin patients is an unresolved issue. The purpose of this study is to provide the rationale for patient selection in Phase III trials that test the impact of adjuvant therapy on survival in positive margin prostate cancer patients.

METHODS

Early (12 months or less) and delayed (more than 12 months) postoperative prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure have been correlated with distant and local failure, respectively, as the site of first failure. In this study, a Cox regression multivariate analysis was used to determine the significant independent clinical and pathologic predictors of early and delayed postoperative PSA failure in 143 margin-positive prostate cancer patients.

RESULTS

Margin-positive patients with positive pelvic lymph nodes, seminal vesicle invasion, or prostatectomy Gleason sum 8 or higher were excluded. For the remaining patients, a prostatectomy Gleason sum of 7, preoperative PSA more than 20 ng/mL, and an endorectal coil magnetic resonance imaging (erMRI) scan showing extensive disease were significant independent predictors of early postoperative PSA failure. Conversely, a prostatectomy Gleason sum of 6 or less, preoperative PSA 20 ng/mL or less, and an erMRI showing limited disease predicted delayed PSA failure.

CONCLUSIONS

Preliminary data suggest that the pattern of first failure can be predicted by the time course of rise in the postoperative PSA. The preliminary results of this study suggest that patient selection for clinical trials examining the efficacy of postoperative adjuvant therapy in the positive margin patient may be determined on the basis of the clinical and pathologic characteristics that predict early versus delayed postoperative PSA failure.

Evaluation of serum prostate-specific antigen levels after postoperative radiation therapy for pathologic stage T3, N0 prostate cancer

OBJECTIVE

To analyze freedom from progression of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels in patients who have received radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy for pathologic stage T3, N0 prostate cancer.

DESIGN

We assessed the freedom from PSA progression after postoperative radiation therapy and its relationship to several potential prognostic factors during a median follow- up of 43 months.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Thirty Mayo patients received postoperative radiation therapy for pathologic stage T3, N0 prostate cancer between January 1988 and April 1993. Radiation therapy was initiated within 6 months after prostatectomy. Radiation doses ranged from 60 to 67 Gy.

RESULTS

"Freedom from PSA failure" was defined as the actuarial risk of maintaining a serum PSA level at 0.3 ng/mL or less. The freedom from failure rate was 66% at 3 and 4 years. Prognostic factors significantly associated with an improved freedom from failure were a pre-radiation PSA level of 1.0 ng/mL or less and no seminal vesicle involvement. A trend toward an improved freedom from failure was noted in patients with low-grade (1 and 2) tumors in comparison with high-grade (3 and 4) tumors. Treatment-related morbidity was minimal.

CONCLUSION

Radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy for pathologic stage T3, N0 prostate cancer seems to provide an improved freedom from PSA failure in comparison with that noted in other series of similar patients treated with radical prostatectomy only.

Predicting the need for adjuvant systemic therapy in patients receiving postprostatectomy irradiation

OBJECTIVES

This study was initiated to determine if clinical, pathologic, or biochemical variables available in patients receiving postprostatectomy irradiation could be predictive of treatment outcomes, including the need for subsequent systemic therapy.

METHODS

Between January 1992 and January 1995, 50 patients received external beam irradiation for a nonzero or rising postprostatectomy prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level. The median PSA values preoperatively and preradiation were 24 and 2.7 ng/mL, respectively. At the time of treatment, no patient had evidence of disseminated disease. The patients received a combination of axial and noncoplanar irradiation to an average total dose of 65 Gy at 1.8 Gy fractions. Univariate analysis and multivariate logistic regression were performed to identify factors predictive of outcome.

RESULTS

Treatment was well tolerated with no grade 3 or higher gastrointestinal or genitourinary complications. A decline in the serum PSA during irradiation occurred in 82% of the patients. During radiation, 13 patients (26%) had a complete response (PSA less than 0.05 ng/mL), 56% had a partial response, and 18% had a rise in their PSA level. With a median follow-up of 16 months, 50% of all patients have an undetectable level of PSA. Twenty-six percent of patients have had evidence of biochemical progression. Seventeen percent of responding patients and 67% of nonresponders have evidence of progression (P= 0.002). On univariate analysis, other significant prognostic factors included clinical stage (P < 0.01), the preradiation PSA level (P < 0.05), and N stage (P < 0.01). On stepwise multivariate logistic analysis, a predictive model was generated from which treatment outcome could be predicted with 80% accuracy (percent correct classification) and an 85% sensitivity.

CONCLUSIONS

The outcome of patients with an elevated postprostatectomy PSA level who receive irradiation can be accurately predicted using a combination of clinical stage, preradiation PSA value, Gleason score, and the response to treatment. In this way, patients who do not require additional treatment (that is, hormonal) will avoid the unnecessary cost and toxicity.

The result of radical retropubic prostatectomy and adjuvant therapy for pathologic stage C prostate cancer

PURPOSE

The results of therapy in 288 men with pathologic Stage C prostate cancer who underwent radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) were analyzed to determine the effects of adjuvant therapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty-seven of the 288 patients received preoperative neoadjuvant hormonal therapy (leuprolide acetate). Postoperatively, 60 patients received adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) to the prostate bed. Follow-up ranged from 3 to 83 months (median = 32 months). Freedom from failure (FFF) was defined as maintaining a serum PSA level of < or = 0.3 ng/ml.

RESULTS

The FFF was 61% at 3 years and 45% at 5 years for the entire group. The FFF following RRP plus RT was 75% at 3 years and 57% at 5 years as compared to 56% at 3 years and 40% at 5 years for RRP without RT (p=0.049). The FFF following RRP plus neoadjuvant hormonal therapy was 58% at 3 years and 40% at 5 years as compared to 60% at 3 years and 45% at 5 years following RRP without hormonal therapy (p=0.3). In patients without seminal vesicle (SV) invasion, the FFF was 81% at 3 years and 5 years for RRP plus RT as compared to 61% at 3 years and 50% at 5 years for RRP without RT (p=0.01). In patients with SV invasion, the FFF was 61% at 3 years and 36% at 5 years for RRP plus RT as compared to 44% at 3 years and 23% at 5 years for RRP without RT (p=0.23). The projected local control rate was 83% at 5 years for those with RRP alone as compared to 100% for RRP plus RT (p=0.02). Survival at 5 years was projected to be 92% and was not significantly altered by the administration of adjuvant therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

Postoperative RT was associated with significantly improved local control and FFF rates, especially in patients with tumors which did not involve the seminal vesicles.

Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathologic stage T3/4 adenocarcinoma of the prostate: ten-year update

PURPOSE

To determine the role of adjuvant postoperative radiotherapy (RT) following radical prostatectomy (RP) in a group of patients with pathologic Stage T3/4 adenocarcinoma of the prostate followed for a median of 10 years after treatment.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1970 and 1983, 159 patients underwent RP for newly diagnosed adenocarcinoma of the prostate and were found to have pathologic Stage T3/4. Forty-six received adjuvant RT and 113 did not. Radiotherapy usually consisted of 45-50 Gy to the whole pelvis followed by a boost to the prostate bed of 10-15 Gy, to a total dose of 55-65 Gy. Patients were analyzed with respect to survival, disease-free survival, local control, and freedom from distant metastases. A rising prostate-specific antigen in the absence of other evidence of relapse was scored as a separate category of recurrence.

RESULTS

Both groups of patients have been followed for a median of 10 years. The actuarial survival at 10 and 15 years was 62% and 62% for the RT group compared to 52% and 37%, respectively, for the RP group (p = 0.18). The disease-free survival for the Rt group was 55% and 48% at 10 and 15 years, respectively, compared to 37% and 33% for the RP group (p = 0.16). Similarly, there was no difference in the rate of distant metastases between the two groups. In contrast, the local relapse rate was significantly reduced by the addition of postoperative radiotherapy. The actuarial local control rate at 10 and 15 years was 92% and 82%, respectively, for the RT group vs 60% and 53% for the RP group (p = 0.002).

CONCLUSIONS

While postoperative pelvic RT significantly improves local control compared to RP alone for pathologic Stage T3/4 prostate cancer, it has no impact on distant metastases and consequently does not improve survival. These data are consistent with the conclusion that many patients with pathologic Stage T3/4 prostate cancer have occult metastases at presentation and will not be cured by local therapies alone. The optimal treatment for this patient population remains to be established.

External beam radiotherapy of localized prostatic adenocarcinoma. Evaluation of conformal therapy, field number and target margins

The purpose of the present study was to identify factors of importance in the planning of external beam radiotherapy of prostatic adenocarcinoma. Seven patients with urogenital cancers were planned for external radiotherapy of the prostate. Four different techniques were used, viz. a 4-field box technique and four-, five- or six-field conformal therapy set-ups combined with three different margins (1-3 cm). The evaluations were based on the doses delivered to the rectum and the urinary bladder. A normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) was calculated for each plan using Lyman's dose volume reduction method. The most important factors that resulted in a decrease of the dose delivered to the rectum and the bladder were the use of conformal therapy and smaller margins. Conformal therapy seemed more important for the dose distribution in the urinary bladder. Five- and six-field set-ups were not significantly better than those with four fields. NTCP calculations were in accordance with the evaluation of the dose volume histograms. To conclude, four-field conformal therapy utilizing reduced margins improves the dose distribution to the rectum and the urinary bladder in the radiotherapy of prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Primary radiation therapy in the treatment of localized prostatic cancer

Prostatic carcinoma is one of the leading causes of male cancer deaths. However, the routine diagnostic and therapeutic strategies have not yet been established. Although the outcome of surgical and radiotherapeutical approaches has frequently been reported to be comparable, the profile of side effects is different. This could offer the basis for selecting the treatment of choice in individual cases. During the last decade the radiotherapeutical technique has markedly improved, in part due to the achievements in the field of computer assisted tomography planning and conformal technique; the outcome of side-effects has decreased with concurrent increase in the rate of local control. The prescribing, recording and reporting of irradiation have also recently developed, as well as the staging of the disease. Therefore we consider it timely to review progress in this subject and to emphasize the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of localized prostatic cancer.

A multivariable analysis of clinical factors predicting for pathological features associated with local failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

A multivariate analysis is used to determine the predictive value of pretreatment clinical indicators on pathologic features associated with local failure after radical prostatectomy in patients with prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective review of the pathologic findings of 235 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated between 1990 and 1993 with a radical retropubic prostatectomy was performed. The preoperative clinical data including the serum prostate specific antigen, clinical stage, Gleason sum, and endorectal magnetic resonance scan findings are used to identify patients prior to definitive treatment who would be at high risk for having pathologic features associated with local failure at radical prostatectomy. Outcome prediction curves are constructed from a logistic regression multivariate analysis displaying the probability of pathologic involvement of the seminal vesicle, extracapsular disease, or positive surgical margins as a function of the preoperative prostate specific antigen and Gleason sum for the cases when the endorectal magnetic resonance scan is positive, negative, or not included in the multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

Factors identified on multivariate analysis as significant predictors of seminal vesicle invasion include endorectal magnetic resonance scan findings (p < 0.0001), and preoperative prostate specific antigen (p = 0.017). Endorectal magnetic resonance scan findings (p = 0.0016), preoperative prostate specific antigen (p = 0.0002), and Gleason sum (p < 0.0001) were significant predictors of extracapsular extension and preoperative prostate specific antigen (p < 0.0001) and Gleason sum (p = 0.03) were significant predictors of disease extending to the margins of resection. Clinical stage was not a significant predictor (p > 0.05) of pathologic features associated with local failure on multivariate analysis. As a single modality, endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging was accurate 93%, 69%, and 72% of the time for predicting seminal vesicle invasion, transcapsular disease, and final pathologic stage, respectively. Failure to recognize microscopic penetration of the capsule found at the time of pathologic evaluation in a prostate gland with a grossly intact capsule accounts for the majority (70%) of the staging inaccuracies.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of the endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance scan findings in conjunction with both the serum prostate specific antigen and Gleason sum improves the clinical accuracy of predicting those patients at high risk for clinically unsuspected extraprostatic disease. In particular, for the subgroup of patients with moderately elevated prostate specific antigen (> 10-20 ng/mL) and intermediate grade clinically organ confined prostate cancer [Gleason sum: 5-7] where the specificity of these tests to predict for occult extraprostatic disease is suboptimal, the additional information obtained from the endorectal coil magnetic resonance scan allows the physician to definitively subgroup these patients into low and high risk for seminal vesicle invasion or transcapsular disease.

Adjuvant irradiation after prostatectomy for carcinoma of the prostate with positive surgical margins

BACKGROUND

Patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate treated with prostatectomy who have tumor at the margins of the surgical specimen or tumor involvement of the seminal vesicles have a high risk of local recurrence and metastatic disease. It is unclear whether postoperative irradiation improves their outcome.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis of patients treated with prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma of the prostate who had surgical margins or seminal vesicles involved by tumor. Thirty-four patients received adjuvant postoperative irradiation (Group 1), and 43 patients did not receive irradiation (Group 2).

RESULTS

The tumor control rates in the prostatic bed for patients who had radical prostatectomy were 100% and 84% in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (P = 0.017). Actuarial 10-year disease-free survival from the date of prostatectomy was 46% and 55% for Groups 1 and 2, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Adjuvant irradiation after prostatectomy in patients with positive surgical margins or seminal vesical invasion increases prostatic bed local tumor control but does not affect survival. Postoperative irradiation is associated with acceptable morbidity.

Localized carcinoma of the prostate (stages T1B, T1C, T2, and T3). Review of management with external beam radiation therapy

BACKGROUND

Optimal treatment for patients with localized carcinoma of the prostate is controversial. Radiation therapy is an established modality in the management of these patients, and several reports indicate the results are comparable to those achieved with radical prostatectomy. Recently effectiveness of therapy for carcinoma of the prostate is being evaluated in light of post-treatment prostate-specific antigen (PSA) determinations.

METHODS

A review was performed of multiple publications and data from selected institutions with large experience in the management of carcinoma of the prostate. Survival and clinical incidence of local recurrence and distant metastases were analyzed as well as preliminary data on postirradiation PSA levels. Factors that affect the outcome of therapy and relevant clinical trials are discussed.

RESULTS

Reported differences in the age of patients treated with radical prostatectomy (59-63 years), irradiation (63-69 years), or observation (69-75.5 years) were identified. The effect of surgical staging on outcome of irradiation was significant. In multiple series of patients clinically and radiographically staged, the 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) with external irradiation was 95-100% for clinical stage T1a, 80-90% for Stage T1b,c, and 50-70% for clinical Stage T3. A correlation has been identified between the initial PSA levels and the probability from freedom of chemical failure (PSA elevation) after definitive irradiation. In five series comprising 814 patients with Stage T1c and T2 tumors, the DFS (end point chemical failure) was 95%, with initial PSA of less than 4 ng/ml, 83-92% with 4.1-10 ng/ml, 35-85% with 10.1-20 ng/ml, and 10-63% with PSA higher than 20 ng/ml. In the various series, follow-up ranged from a median of 1.5 years to a minimum of 4 years. In two series of 225 and 201 patients receiving doses of 7500-8000 cGy, less morbidity has been observed with three-dimensional treatment planning conformal radiation therapy than with conventional irradiation. New directions for future clinical trials are discussed, including dose escalation studies; use of high linear energy transfer to improve locoregional tumor control; and combination of irradiation and androgen suppression to enhance local tumor control, decrease distant metastasis, and improve survival. Preliminary results of a randomized study recently reported by RTOG strongly suggest that the use of goserelin acetate and flutamide decreases the incidence of clinical local recurrence (12.4% in 225 patients) compared with a control group treated with irradiation alone (25.2% in 230 patients) and enhances disease-free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Although modern approaches to the management of patients with localized carcinoma of the prostate with irradiation are effective, investigators must continue to critically assess policies of treatment, develop appropriately designed prospective clinical trials, and define the optimal management of patients with localized carcinoma of the prostate.

Residual disease after radical surgery or radiation therapy for prostate cancer. Clinical significance and therapeutic implications

Radical treatment for prostate cancer aims at complete eradication of tumor. This review of published data makes clear that the goal is less frequently achieved than commonly presumed. Following radical prostatectomy extracapsular disease, carrying a significant risk of local recurrence, is found from 12-68% of the time depending on the clinical tumor stage. Local regrowth is associated with a poorer prognosis. A substantial proportion of patients whose prostate glands are rebiopsied more than 18 months after radiation therapy also have residual tumor. This again predicts for clinical relapse. The likelihood of a positive rebiopsy is dependent on original tumor size and current prostate specific antigen (PSA) levels. Strategies for managing residual disease are critically discussed.

Irradiation in relapsing carcinoma of the prostate

BACKGROUND

Radiation therapy plays a major role in the management of patients with either locally recurrent or metastatic carcinoma of the prostate.

RESULTS

In 23 patients with isolated postprostatectomy local recurrences treated with doses of 60-65 Gy, 17 (74%) had tumor control, and 45% survived relapse-free for 5 years after treatment of the recurrence. Pelvic irradiation has been used to treat patients with elevated prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after radical prostatectomy. This was tried, and 17 of 24 patients (70%) showed a significant decrease in PSA levels after irradiation, in five without subsequent elevation. Two of the seven patients with elevated PSA levels later had distant metastases. Local irradiation has been reported to yield excellent relief of symptoms in 100% of patients with hematuria, 80% with urinary outflow obstruction, and 50-70% with ureteral obstruction or pelvic pain secondary to locally advanced prostatic carcinoma. Reirradiation, particularly with brachytherapy (in preliminary studies combined with hyperthermia) has been used in the management of postirradiation prostatic recurrences with satisfactory tumor regression in approximately 75% of patients. The Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) reported on the palliative effects of external irradiation on patients with bony metastasis. Approximately 54% of such patients had complete relief, and 29% had partial relief of bone pain. However, the retreatment rate of the bony metastasis was lower in the patients receiving higher doses. In a RTOG protocol in which all patients received local irradiation for osseous metastases, 77 were randomized to receive elective hemibody irradiation and 69, local treatment only. The frequency of additional treatment at 1 year was lower in the hemibody irradiation group (54% versus 78%). Occasionally, brain, mediastinal, or liver metastasis can be treated with irradiation. Radioactive phosphorus-32 or strontium-89 has been administered for disseminated bony metastasis with improvement of bone pain in approximately 70-80% of treated patients.

CONCLUSION

The role of irradiation in the treatment of spinal cord compression is discussed. Significant improvement of neurologic function has been reported in 36-60% of the patients, depending on severity of deficit and promptness in instituting emergency treatment.

Postoperative radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy for prostate carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The role and benefit of adjuvant radiation therapy after radical prostatectomy is unclear. This role was evaluated in 58 patients who, after undergoing radical prostatectomy for prostate carcinoma, had local extension of disease beyond the prostate or positive surgical margins. Thirty-nine patients treated surgically alone were compared with 19 patients who received adjuvant postoperative radiation therapy. All patients were followed for at least 5 years, and 50 patients had 10-year follow-ups.

RESULTS

At 10 years, the actuarial local failure rate was 31% for patients treated with prostatectomy alone versus 6% for the group receiving postoperative radiation therapy (P less than 0.05). The actuarial survival and metastasis-free survival were similar for both groups. When patients with involved lymph nodes were excluded from analysis, the addition of radiation therapy resulted in improved recurrence-free survival (91% versus 46% at 10 years, P = 0.04) and in a trend toward improved metastasis-free survival (91% versus 55%, P = 0.08). Complications occurred in similar frequencies in both groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In patients with local disease extension or positive surgical margins after radical prostatectomy, adjuvant radiation therapy improved local control and was administered with acceptable side effects.

Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the prostate. A clinicopathologic study of 12 patients

Sarcomatoid carcinoma of the prostate is a rare tumor that can be difficult to distinguish from a true sarcoma. The authors report 12 patients in whom the typical light microscopic appearance of prostatic adenocarcinoma was accompanied by the appearance of spindled or pleomorphic sarcomatoid areas within the same specimen or in subsequent accessions. Immunostaining or electron microscopic study demonstrated epithelial differentiation within the sarcomatoid area(s) in 6 of the 11 patients in whom special studies were performed. All nine patients for whom follow-up data were available died of disease within 3 to 48 months (median time until death, 12.0 months) after the appearance of the sarcomatoid carcinoma, and the clinical course in each instance was characterized by aggressive local recurrence. Our experience confirms that sarcomatoid carcinoma of the prostate is an aggressive variant of prostatic adenocarcinoma.

Temporary iridium-192 implant in the management of carcinoma of the prostate

The controversy about the treatment of carcinoma of the prostate has increased in the last decade, with most urologists favoring radical prostatectomy rather than primary irradiation. Several reports of persistent tumors in 50% to 90% of patients after external irradiation and permanent iodine-125 implantation of the prostate have been disturbing. From July 1977 to December 1985, 200 patients with adenocarcinoma of the prostate were treated by combining bilateral pelvic lymphadenectomy and temporary interstitial iridium-192 implantation of the prostate, followed by external irradiation. Seventy-four (36%) patients underwent biopsies of the prostate 4 months to 2 years after completion of the irradiation. Only 12 (16%) patients had persistent tumors. Complications were minimized subsequently by dose modifications.

Serum prostate-specific antigen after post-prostatectomy radiotherapy

External beam radiotherapy was administered to 39 patients after radical prostatectomy for adenocarcinoma. Thirty-seven of 39 patients had detectable levels of serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) prior to irradiation as evidence of residual carcinoma (biochemical evidence of disease). Two patients also had palpable recurrences. Pathologic analysis of the surgical specimens suggested that positive surgical margins, seminal vesicle or lymph node involvement, or high Gleason pattern scores are associated with measurable PSA after surgery. Follow-up ranged from two to seventy-four months (mean 26.8 months). To date, local control has been achieved in all but 1 patient (including 2 patients with palpable tumor prior to radiotherapy). Two distinct risk groups for the development of distant metastases based on the trend of the PSA in relation to the duration of follow-up after radiotherapy are defined. In the high-risk group (those patients with a rising PSA), in 9 of the 18 bone metastases have developed, while none of the 17 low-risk patients have metastatic disease.