Improving Dose Volume Histogram (DVH) Based Analysis of Clinical Outcomes Using Modern Statistical Techniques: A Systematic Answer to Multiple Comparisons Concerns

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

DVH constraints are essential in the clinical practice of radiation therapy. Historically, DVH constraints were found through sparse sampling of all possible DVH indices to find one that appeared to be most predictive for clinical toxicity. This approach can lead to inconsistent results among studies and to multiple comparison concerns. We aim to solve both problems by examining a full array of DVH indices using statistical methods that account for strong correlations among DVH indices and incorporate radiobiological knowledge constraints.

MATERIALS/METHODS

We extracted a dense array of V%_D indices from a treatment planning system using ESAPI interface, with V%_D corresponding to the volume fraction irradiated to dose D, or higher. We used Fused Lasso as the base model to compensate for correlations among DVH indices because it applies a penalty on the difference between DVH variables with adjacent dose. The base model was augmented with additional constraints based on radiobiological considerations: the positivity constraint (beta_i > 0) which assumes that any tissue irradiation cannot reduce the risk of toxicity, and monotonicity constraint (beta_i+1 > = beta_i) which assumes that higher dose to a fixed volume fraction cannot be associated with a lower risk of toxicity. We called the hybrid model KC-Lasso (Knowledge Constrained Lasso) and applied it to two clinical examples: grade 2 acute rectal toxicity in conventionally fractionated RT for 79 prostate cancer patients (77.4 Gy + MR based boost to 81-83 Gy) and cardiac toxicity in conventionally fractionated RT for 119 locally advanced Non-small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients (Median prescribed dose 62 Gy). We further examined alternative data driven models to determine the importance of knowledge constraints.

RESULTS

KC-Lasso detected two distinct dose thresholds for grade 2 rectal toxicity, at 35 Gy and 78 Gy. A threshold of 51 Gy was detected for reduced overall survival due to cardiac irradiation in NSCLC patients. An examination of KC-Lasso models at varying step size suggested that a single mid-range index can be used as a treatment planning constraint while full model can be used for confirmatory, final plan evaluation. Alternative models which lack knowledge constraints show patterns of negative and isolated coefficients which are difficult to interpret and are not likely to be generalizable.

CONCLUSION

A more systematic approach to the analysis of correlations between DVH constraints and clinical toxicity can lead to greater consistency of results among different studies, better understanding of true dose thresholds and results which are more generalizable.

Radiotherapy for Metastatic Spinal Cord Compression with Increased Doses: Final Results of the RAMSES-01 Trial

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

To investigate the outcomes of precision-radiotherapy (RT) with 15 × 2.633 Gy (EQD2 = 41.6 Gy for tumor cell kill, α/β = 10 Gy) or 18 × 2.333 Gy (EQD2 = 43.2 Gy) in patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) and favorable survival prognoses (>35 points on a validated survival score). In addition, these patients were compared to a historical control group of patients with favorable prognoses treated with 10 × 3 Gy (EQD2 = 32.5 Gy).

MATERIALS/METHODS

In a multi-center phase 2 study (RAMSES-01), patients with MSCC and favorable survival prognoses receiving 15 × 2.633 Gy or 18 × 2.333 Gy of precision-RT alone (no upfront surgery) were mainly evaluated for local progression-free survival (LPFS), defined as no deterioration of motor function during RT and no in-field recurrence of MSCC following RT, at 12 months (primary endpoint). Secondary endpoints included improvement of motor and sensory functions, post-RT ambulatory status, relief of pain and distress, toxicity, and survival (OS). The maximum relative doses allowed to the spinal cord were 101.5 % of the prescribed dose for 18 × 2.333 Gy and 101.2% for 15 × 2.633 Gy, respectively (both representing an EQD2 of 46.6 Gy for myelopathy, α/β = 2 Gy). In addition, the RAMSES-cohort was compared to a historical control group (N = 266) irradiated with 10 × 3 Gy (propensity score adjusted Cox regression).

RESULTS

In the RAMSES-cohort, 50 (of 62 planned) patients were evaluable for LPFS and included in the analyses. Since OS was worse than expected, a new survival score was developed, which was more precise in predicting OS than a previous tool. As a consequence, the RAMSES-trial, which was based on the previous score, was terminated. In the 50 patients included so far, 12-month rates of LPFS and OS were 97.6% and 69.9%, respectively. Improvement of motor function occurred in 28 patients (56.0%), and 47 patients (94.0%) were ambulatory following RT. Within 3 months following RT, 12 of 21 patients (57.2%) with pre-RT sensory deficits improved, 38 of 45 patients (84.4%) with pre-RT pain experienced at least partial relief, and 39 of 50 patients (78.0%) reported relief of distress. Ten of 50 patients (20.0%) experienced grade 2 toxicities (mainly esophagitis/dysphagia) and another two patients (4.0%) grade 3 toxicities (1 diarrhea, 1 esophagitis). After propensity score adjustment, the RAMSES-cohort showed significantly better LPFS than the control group (hazard ratio = 0.125, 95% confidence interval = 0.016 - 0.962, p = 0.046) and a strong trend regarding improvement of motor function (hazard ratio = 1.943, 95% confidence interval = 0.981 - 3.850, p = 0.057). Post-RT ambulatory rates (p = 0.56) and OS rates (p = 0.62) were not significantly different.

CONCLUSION

Precision-RT with 15 × 2.633 Gy or 18 × 2.333 Gy was sufficiently well tolerated and resulted in significantly better long-term LPFS than 10 × 3 Gy in patients with MSCC and favorable survival prognoses. Thus, the dose-fractionation regimens of the RAMSES-01 trial appear preferable for these patients.

Oncologic Outcomes of Conventionally Fractionated, Hypofractionated, and Stereotactic Body Spot-Scanned Proton Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: The Mayo Clinic Experience

PURPOSE/OBJECTIVE(S)

Spot/pencil beam scanned proton therapy is a relatively new technology with fundamental differences from double scattered or IMRT. We aimed to report the long-term oncologic outcomes of a contemporary prospective series of patients treated with spot-scanned proton therapy (SSPT).

MATERIALS/METHODS

An IRB-approved prospective registry identified patients with prostate cancer treated with proton therapy between January 2016 and December 2018. Descriptive statistics were calculated for all patients. Clinical, demographic, and treatment characteristics were gathered and analyzed. Kaplan-Meier curves were generated to estimate survival and recurrence rates. Outcomes assessed included 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-year local control (LC), biochemical failure (BF), regional and distant failures, and physician-reported adverse events (AEs). Biochemical failure was defined as rise in PSA ≥ 2.0 ng/mL above nadir PSA. Acute and chronic gastrointestinal (GI) and genitourinary (GU) grade 2+ and grade 3+ baseline-adjusted AEs were assigned using CTCAE v5.0. All failures were re-staged with PET C-11 or PSMA.

RESULTS

With a median follow up of 4.4 years (IQR 3.7 - 5), two hundred and eighty-six prostate cancer patients with a median age of 72 (IQR 67.5 - 77) were treated with spot-scanned proton radiation. The median Gleason grade group was 3 (IQR 2 - 4). The median pre-RT PSA was 6.9 ng/mL (IQR 4.3 - 10.5). Median T-stage was T1c. Nearly 64% of all patients were on androgen deprivation therapy at the time of initiating radiation treatment. The median total radiation dose was 79.2 Gy delivered over 44 fractions, 70 Gy over 28 fractions, and 38 Gy over 5 fractions for CF, HF, and SBRT regimens, respectively. The BF rate for all patients was 8.4%. The 5-year LC rates for CF, HF, and SBRT were 100% (95% CI: 100 - 100), 100% (95% CI: 100 - 100), and 97.3% (95% CI: 92.2 - 100), respectively (p = 0.07). Regional recurrences occurred in 12 (4.2%) patients: 8 (5.6%) treated with CF, 2 (2.1%) with HF, and 2 (4.3%) with SBRT (p = 0.62). Distant metastatic failures occurred in 12 patients (4.2%): 5 (3.5%) treated with CF, 7 (7.4%) with HF, and none with SBRT (0%) (p = 0.052). The 5-year OS for patients treated with CF, HF, and SBRT SSPT were 88.2% (95% CI: 81.8 - 95), 86.2% (95% CI: 77.6 - 95.6), and 97.2% (95% CI: 92 - 100), respectively (p = 0.1). Acute and chronic grade 2+ GI baseline-adjusted AEs occurred in 8 (2.8%) and 51 (17.8%) patients, respectively. Acute and chronic grade 3+ GI baseline-adjusted AEs occurred in 3 (1%) and 4 (1.4%) patients, respectively. Acute and chronic grade 2+ GU-related AEs were observed in 72 (25.2%) and 63 (22%) patients, respectively. Acute and chronic grade 3+ GU toxicity was observed in 3 (1%) and 6 (2.1%) patients, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Spot-scanned proton radiation therapy provides high local control rates and excellent oncologic outcomes across different fractionation schedules with low long-term AE rates.

Modeling of Acute Rectal Toxicity to Compare Two Patient Positioning Methods for Prostate Cancer Radiotherapy: Can Toxicity Modeling be Used for Quality Assurance?

Purpose:

Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) allows for significant dose reductions to organs at risk in prostate cancer patients. However, the accurate delivery of IMRT plans can be compromised by patient positioning errors. The purpose of this study was to determine if the modeling of grade ≥ 2 acute rectal toxicity could be used to monitor the quality of IMRT protocols.

Materials and Methods:

79 patients treated with Image and Fiducial Markers Guided IMRT (FMIGRT) and 302 patients treated with trans-abdominal ultrasound guided IMRT (USGRT) was selected for this study. Treatment plans were available for the FMIGRT group, and hand recorded dosimetric indices were available for both groups. We modeled toxicity in the FMIGRT group using the Lyman Kutcher Burman (LKB) and Univariate Logistic Regression (ULR) models, and we modeled toxicity in USGRT group using the ULR model. We performed Receiver Operating Characteristics (ROC) analysis on all of the models and compared the Area under the ROC curve (AUC) for the FMIGRT and the USGRT groups.

Results:

The observed Incidence of grade ≥ 2 rectal toxicity was 20% in FMIGRT patients and 54% in USGRT patients. LKB model parameters in the FMIGRT group were TD₅₀=56.8 Gy, slope m=0.093, and exponent n=0.131. The most predictive indices in the ULR model for the FMIGRT group were D_25% and V_{50 Gy}. AUC for both models in the FMIGRT group was similar (AUC=0.67). The FMIGRT URL model predicted less than a 37% incidence of grade ≥ 2 acute rectal toxicity in the USGRT group. A fit of the ULR model to USGRT data did not yield a predictive model (AUC=0.5).

Conclusion:

Modeling of acute rectal toxicity provided a quantitative measure of the correlation between planning dosimetry and this clinical endpoint. Our study suggests that an unusually weak correlation may indicate a persistent patient positioning error.

Predictors of survival in patients with brain metastases from gastric cancer

This study aims to identify predictors of survival and contribute to treatment personalization in patients with brain metastases from gastric cancer. Twelve patients received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT), four stereotactic radiosurgery and six neurosurgery plus WBRT. Treatment regimen, age, gender, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, tumor site, number of brain metastases, extra-cranial metastases and interval between cancer diagnosis and brain metastases were evaluated for survival. On univariate analyses, more intensive treatment (p=0.003), ECOG-score 0-1 (p<0.001), cardiac location (p=0.025) and single brain metastasis (p=0.023) were associated with better survival. On multivariate analysis, ECOG-score maintained significance (p<0.001). Patients with all three positive factors on univariate analysis had a 12-month survival rate of 100%, patients with three negative factors a 3-month survival rate of 0%. Predictors of survival were identified that can guide physicians selecting personalized treatment approaches for patients with brain metastases from gastric cancer.

Pathways to improving combined modality therapy for stage III nonsmall-cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer deaths, having caused an estimated 1.6 million deaths worldwide in 2012 [Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Dikshit R et al. Cancer incidence and mortality worldwide: sources, methods and major patterns in GLOBOCAN 2012. Int J Cancer 2015; 136: E359-E386].

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Although the majority of patients are not cured with currently available therapies, there have been significant improvements in stage-specific outcomes over time [Videtic G, Vokes E, Turrisi A et al. The survival of patients treated for stage III non-small cell lung cancer in North America has increased during the past 25 years. In The 39th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, ASCO 2003, Chicago, IL. Abstract 2557. p. 291]. This review focuses on past progress and ongoing research in the treatment of locally advanced, inoperable nonsmall-cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

RESULTS

In the past, randomized trials revealed advantages to the use of thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) and then, the addition of induction chemotherapy. This was followed by studies that determined concurrent chemoradiotherapy to be superior to sequential therapy. A recent large phase III trial found that the administration of 74 Gy of conventionally fractionated photon-based TRT provided poorer survival than did the standard 60 Gy. However, further research on other methods of applying radiotherapy (hypofractionation, adaptive TRT, proton therapy, and stereotactic TRT boosting) is proceeding and may improve outcomes. The molecular characterization of tumors has provided more effective and less toxic targeted treatments in the stage IV setting and these agents are currently under investigation for earlier stage disease. Similarly, immune-enhancing therapies have shown promise in stage IV disease and are also being tested in the locally advanced setting.

CONCLUSION

For locally advanced, inoperable NSCLC, standard therapy has evolved from TRT alone to combined modality therapy. We summarize the recent clinical trial experience and outline promising areas of investigation in an era of greater molecular and immunologic understanding of cancer care.

Predicting the presence of extracranial metastases in patients with brain metastases upon first diagnosis of cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study aimed to determine factors allowing the prediction of extracranial metastases in patients presenting with brain metastases at the first diagnosis of cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Data from 659 patients with brain metastases upon first diagnosis of cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The parameters age, gender, Karnofsky performance score (KPS), primary tumor type and number of brain metastases were compared between 359 patients with extracranial metastases and 300 patients without extracranial metastases. Additional analyses were performed for patients with the most unfavorable and those with the most favorable characteristics.

RESULTS

The comparison of patients with versus without extracranial metastases revealed significant differences between the groups in terms of KPS (p < 0.001) and number of brain metastases (p < 0.001). Of the study patients, 113 had both most unfavorable characteristics, i.e. KPS ≤ 50 and ≥ 4 brain metastases. The sensitivity for identifying patients with extracranial metastases was 82 %; specificity was 51 %. A total of 50 patients had KPS ≥ 90 and only one brain metastasis. The sensitivity for identifying patients without extracranial metastases was 86 %; specificity was 58 %.

CONCLUSION

The combination of KPS and the number of brain metastases can help to predict the presence or absence of extracranial metastases.

Androgen receptor expression: prognostic value in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study investigated the prognostic value of androgen receptor (AR) expression of tumor cells in patients treated with surgery and subsequent radio(chemo)therapy for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The impact of AR and 11 additional factors on locoregional control (LRC), metastases-free survival (MFS), and overall survival (OS) was retrospectively studied in 163 patients with nonmetastatic stage III/IV SCCHN. Additional factors included age, gender, ECOG performance status, pre-radiotherapy (pre-RT) hemoglobin levels, tumor site, histologic grade, T category, N category, HPV status, extent of resection, and concurrent chemotherapy.

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis, improved LRC was significantly associated with pre-RT hemoglobin levels≥12 g/dl (risk ratio [RR] 2.22; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.19–4.13; p=0.013), tumor site (RR 1.39; 95% CI 1.14–1.70; p=0.001), lower T category (RR 1.67; 95% CI 1.18–2.44; p=0.003), and lower N category (RR 4.18; 95% CI 1.90–10.55; p<0.001). Improved MFS was associated with AR expression (RR 2.21; 95% CI 1.01–5.41; p=0.048), better ECOG performance status (RR 3.19; 95% CI 1.50–7.14; p=0.003), lower T category (RR 2.24; 95% CI 1.47–3.65; p<0.001), and lower N category (RR 5.33; 95% CI 2.07–16.63; p<0.001). OS was positively associated with AR expression (RR 1.99; 95% CI 1.06–4.00; p=0.032), better ECOG performance status (RR 2.20; 95% CI 1.20–4.09; p=0.010), pre-RT hemoglobin levels≥12 g/dl (RR 2.13; 95% CI 1.19–3.82; p=0.012), lower T category (RR 1.81; 95% CI 1.30–2.62; p<0.001), and lower N category (RR 3.41; 95% CI: 1.65–7.80; p<0.001).

CONCLUSION

Tumor cell expression of AR was an independent prognostic factor for MFS and OS and should be considered in future prospective trials.

Brain metastasis. Prognostic value of the number of involved extracranial organs

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study was performed to evaluate the prognostic role for survival of the number and the type of involved extracranial organs in patients with brain metastasis.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The data of 1146 patients who received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone for brain metastasis have been retrospectively analyzed. In addition to the number of involved extra cranial organs, seven potential prognostic factors were investigated including WBRT regimen, age, gender, Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), primary tumor type, number of brain metastases, and the interval from cancer diagnosis to WBRT. Additionally, subgroup analyses were performed for patients with involvement of one (lung vs. bone vs. liver vs. other metastasis) and two (lung + lymph nodes vs. lung + bone vs. lung + liver vs. liver + bone vs. other combinations) extracranial organs.

RESULTS

The 6-month survival rates for the involvement of 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥4 extracranial organs were 51, 30, 16, 13, and 10%, respectively (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the number of involved extracranial organs maintained significance (risk ratio 1.26; 95% confidence interval 1.18-1.34; p<0.001). According to the multivariate analysis, age (p<0.001), gender (p=0.002), and KPS (p<0.001) were also independent prognostic factors for survival. In the subgroup analyses of patients with involvement of one and two extracranial organs, survival was not significantly different based on the extracranial organ involved.

CONCLUSION

The number of involved extracranial organs proved to be an independent prognostic factor in patients with brain metastasis, regardless of the organs involved. The number of involved extracranial organs should be considered in future trials designed for patients with brain metastasis.

Brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): prognostic importance of the number of involved extracranial organs

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study investigated the potential prognostic value of the number of involved extracranial organs in patients with brain metastasis from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A total of 472 patients who received whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone with 5 × 4 Gy or 10 × 3 Gy for brain metastasis from NSCLC were included in this retrospective study. In addition to the number of involved extracranial organs, 6 further potential prognostic factors were investigated including WBRT regimen, age, gender, Karnofsky Performance Score (KPS), number of brain metastases, and the interval from cancer diagnosis to WBRT. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with metastatic involvement of one (lung vs. bone vs. other metastasis) and two (lung + bone vs. lung+lymph nodes vs. other combinations) extracranial organs.

RESULTS

The survival rates at 6 months of the patients with involvement of 0, 1, 2, 3, and ≥ 4 extracranial organs were 52, 27, 17, 4, and 14%, respectively (p<0.001). On multivariate analysis, the number of involved extracranial organs remained significant (risk ratio 1.32; 95% confidence interval 1.19-1.46; p<0.001). Age <65 years (p=0.004), KPS ≥ 70 (p<0.001), and only 1-3 brain metastases (p=0.022) were also significantly associated with survival in the multivariate analysis. In the separate analyses of patients with involvement of one and two extracranial organs, survival was not significantly different based on the pattern of extracranial organ involvement.

CONCLUSION

The number of involved extracranial organs is an independent prognostic factor of survival in patients with brain metastasis from NSCLC, irrespective of the pattern of extracranial organ involvement.

Impact of the HPV-positivity definition on the prognostic value of HPV status in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study re-evaluated the prognostic value of HPV status for loco-regional control (LRC), metastases-free survival (MFS), and survival (OS) in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN). A modified definition of HPV positivity was used in the current study compared to the authors' previous study.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In the previous study of the same 170 patients, a tumor was defined as HPV-positive if it showed a positive in situ hybridization result in ≥10% of tumor cells and/or positive p16 immunostaining. In the current analysis, tumors were considered HPV-positive only if they showed positive results for both in situ hybridization and p16 immunostaining. In addition to HPV status, the same 11 potential prognostic factors were investigated for treatment outcomes as in the preceding study.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis of the current study, HPV positivity was significantly associated with improved LRC [risk ratio (RR) 9.78; p<0.001], MFS (RR 7.17; p=0.008), and OS (RR 6.61; p<0.001). In the previous study, HPV positivity was associated with LRC (RR 2.34; p=0.014) and OS (RR 2.19; p=0.019), but not with MFS (RR 2.04; p=0.11).

CONCLUSIONS

Applying the new definition of HPV positivity, the impact of HPV status on the prognosis of patients irradiated for locally advanced SCCHN was more prominent than in our previous study and associated with all three investigated endpoints.

Prognostic impact of VEGF and FLT-1 receptor expression in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This study investigated the prognostic value of tumor cell expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and its receptor fms-related tyrosine kinase 1 (FLT-1) in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN) who had been treated with adjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The impact of tumor cell VEGF and FLT-1 expression plus 11 additional factors on loco-regional control (LRC), metastases-free survival (MFS) and overall survival (OS) was retrospectively evaluated in 157 patients. The additional factors were age, gender, performance status, pre-radiotherapy (pre-RT) hemoglobin levels, tumor site, histologic grade, T-category, N-category, human papillomavirus (HPV) status, extent of resection and chemotherapy.

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis, improved LRC was significantly associated with an absence of VEGF expression (risk ratio, RR: 5.02; p = 0.009), lower T-category (RR: 2.00; p < 0.001), lower N-category (RR: 3.75; p < 0.001) and pre-RT hemoglobin levels ≥ 12 g/dl (RR: 2.20; p = 0.029). Improved MFS was significantly associated with an absence of VEGF expression (RR: 7.46; p = 0.002), lower T-category (RR: 1.97; p = 0.002), lower N-category (RR: 3.29; p = 0.005) and a favorable tumor location (RR: 1.34; p = 0.033); HPV positivity showed a trend towards improved MFS (RR: 1.43; p = 0.09). Improved OS was significantly associated with an absence of VEFG expression (RR: 3.22; p = 0.041), pre-RT hemoglobin levels ≥ 12 g/dl (RR: 2.47; p = 0.009), lower T-category (RR: 1.92; p < 0.001) and lower N-category (RR: 3.39; p < 0.001). FLT-1 expression was significantly associated with LRC and OS in the univariate but not in the multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

VEGF expression proved to be an independent negative predictor for LRC, MFS and OS in patients treated for locally advanced SCCHN with adjuvant radiotherapy or radiochemotherapy. FLT-1 expression was not significant in multivariate analyses.

A simple survival score for patients with brain metastases from breast cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Personalized cancer treatment considers the patient's survival prognosis. Therefore, it is important to be able to estimate the patient's survival time, particularly in a palliative situation such as brain metastasis. This study aimed to create and validate a survival score for patients with brain metastasis from breast cancer, which is the second most common primary tumor in these patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data of 230 patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone for brain metastasis from breast cancer were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were assigned to a test (n = 115) or a validation group (n = 115). According to the results of the multivariate analysis of the test group, Karnofsky Performance Score and extracranial metastases were included in the scoring system. The score for each factor was obtained from the 6-month survival rate (in %) divided by 10. Total scores represented the sum of these scores and were 4, 7, 9, or 12 points. Three prognostic groups were formed.

RESULTS

The 6-month survival rates in the test group were 10 % for 4-7 points, 55 % for 9 points, and 78 % for 15 points (p < 0.001). In the validation group the corresponding 6-month survival rates were 11, 54, and 75 %, respectively (p < 0.001). The comparisons between the prognostic groups of the test and the validation group did not show significant differences.

CONCLUSION

This simple survival score appears valid and reproducible. It can be used to estimate the survival time of patients with brain metastasis from breast cancer receiving WBRT alone.

A validated scoring system to identify long-term survivors after radiotherapy for metastatic spinal cord compression

PURPOSE

This study aimed to develop and validate a scoring system to identify long-term survivors after conventional radiotherapy (RT) for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 1,125 patients who had received long-course RT for MSCC were included in this study. Of these patients, 344 survived for over 12 months and 781 died within a year following RT. Based on differences between the distributions of patient characteristics in the two groups, a scoring system was developed. Scores ranged from 0 to 18 points and 15 points was selected as the cutoff for identifying long-term survivors. Data from the 1,125 long-course RT patients (test group) were compared to data from 773 patients receiving short-course RT (validation group).

RESULTS

A score of ≥ 15 points was associated with a 94 % proportion of long-term survivors. The 15-point cutoff resulted in a specificity of 98 % and a positive predictive value of 94 % for identification of long-term surviving patients. The proportions of long-term survivors for each scoring point in the validation group were very similar to those in the test group.

CONCLUSION

This new scoring system enabled identification of long-term survivors after RT for MSCC with very high specificity and positive predictive value. The score proved to be valid and reproducible.

Validation of a survival score for patients treated with whole-brain radiotherapy for brain metastases

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to validate a scoring system published in 2008 to predict the survival of patients receiving whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone for brain metastases.

METHODS

The scoring system included four independent prognostic factors: age, performance status, extracranial metastases, and interval between first diagnosis of cancer and WBRT. The score for each prognostic factor was determined by dividing the 6-month survival rate (in %) by 10. The total score represented the sum of the scores for each prognostic factor. Total scores ranged from 9-18 points, and patients were divided into four groups. In the present study, 350 new patients were evaluated in order to validate the previously developed score.

RESULTS

In the present validation study, the 6-month survival rates were 8 % for patients with a score of 9-10 points (group A), 24 % for those with a score of 11-13 points (group B), 51 % for those with a score of 14-16 points (group C), and 82 % for those with scores of 17-18 points (group D), respectively (p < 0.001). In our previous study published in 2008, the 6-month survival rates were 6 %, 15 %, 43 %, and 76 %, respectively (p < 0.001). The comparisons between each of the four prognostic groups of both series did not reveal a significant difference.

CONCLUSION

In this study, the 6-month survival rates of the four prognostic groups were not significantly different from those of the preceding study. This demonstrates the validity and reproducibility of this score. The score can help select the appropriate treatment for the individual patient and help design prospective trials.

A validated survival score for breast cancer patients with metastatic spinal cord compression

BACKGROUND

To create a validated scoring system predicting survival of breast cancer patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 510 patients, one half were assigned to either the test or the validation group. In the test group, eight pretreatment factors (age, performance status, number of involved vertebrae, ambulatory status, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, interval from cancer diagnosis to radiotherapy of MSCC, time of developing motor deficits) plus the radiation regimen were retrospectively investigated. Factors significantly associated with survival in the multivariate analysis were included in the scoring system. The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 6-month survival rate (%) by ten. The total score was the sum of the scores for each factor.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis of the test group, performance status, ambulatory status, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, interval from cancer diagnosis to radiotherapy of MSCC, and time of developing motor deficits were significant for survival and included in the score. Total scores ranged from 30 to 50 points. In the test group, the 6-month survival rates were 12% for 30-35 points, 41% for 36-40 points, 74% for 41-45 points, and 98% for 46-50 points (p < 0.0001). In the validation group, the 6-month survival rates were 14%, 46%, 77%, and 99%, respectively (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

The survival rates of the validation group were similar to the test group. Therefore, this score was reproducible and can help when selecting the appropriate radiotherapy regimen for each patient taking into account her survival prognosis.

Prophylactic cranial irradiation in small-cell lung cancer: findings from a North Central Cancer Treatment Group Pooled Analysis

BACKGROUND

This pooled analysis evaluated the outcomes of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) in 739 small-cell lung cancer (SCLC patients with stable disease (SD) or better following chemotherapy ± thoracic radiation therapy (TRT) to examine the potential advantage of PCI in a wider spectrum of patients than generally participate in PCI trials.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred eighteen patients with extensive SCLC (ESCLC) and 421 patients with limited SCLC (LSCLC) participated in four phase II or III trials. Four hundred fifty-nine patients received PCI (30 Gy/15 or 25 Gy/10) and 280 did not. Survival and adverse events (AEs) were compared.

RESULTS

PCI patients survived significantly longer than non-PCI patients {hazard ratio [HR] = 0.61 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.52-0.72]; P < 0.0001}. The 1- and 3-year survival rates were 56% and 18% for PCI patients versus 32% and 5% for non-PCI patients. PCI was still significant after adjusting for age, performance status, gender, stage, complete response, and number of metastatic sites (HR = 0.82, P = 0.04). PCI patients had significantly more grade 3+ AEs (64%) compared with non-PCI patients (50%) (P = 0.0004). AEs associated with PCI included alopecia and lethargy. Dose fractionation could be compared only for LSCLC patients and 25 Gy/10 was associated with significantly better survival compared with 30 Gy/15 (HR = 0.67, P = 0.018).

CONCLUSIONS

PCI was associated with a significant survival benefit for both ESCLC and LSCLC patients who had SD or a better response to chemotherapy ± TRT. Dose fractionation appears important. PCI was associated with an increase in overall and specific grade 3+ AE rates.

Impact of zoledronic acid on control of metastatic spinal cord compression

BACKGROUND

Zoledronic acid was demonstrated to reduce the rate of skeletal-related events, a hypernym including various outcomes, in patients with bone metastases. In contrast to other studies, this matched-pair analysis focused solely on the impact of zoledronic acid on metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 98 patients with MSCC receiving radiotherapy plus zoledronic acid were matched 1:2 to 196 patients receiving radiotherapy alone for ten potential prognostic factors. Both groups were compared for local control of MSCC within the irradiated region, overall control of MSCC (local and distant MSCC control), and survival.

RESULTS

The 1-year local control rates were 90% after radiotherapy plus zoledronic acid and 81%, after radiotherapy alone (p = 0.042). The 1-year overall control rates were 87% and 75%, respectively (p = 0.016), and the 1-year survival rates were 60% and 52%, respectively (p = 0.17). Results were significant in the Cox proportional hazards model regarding local control (p = 0.024) and overall control (p = 0.008).

CONCLUSION

According to the results of this study, zoledronic acid was associated with improved control of MSCC in irradiated patients.

A survival score for patients with metastatic spinal cord compression from prostate cancer

BACKGROUND

This study aimed to develop and validate a survival scoring system for patients with metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) from prostate cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Of 436 patients, 218 patients were assigned to the test group and 218 patients to the validation group. Eight potential prognostic factors (age, performance status, number of involved vertebrae, ambulatory status, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, interval from cancer diagnosis to radiotherapy of MSCC, time developing motor deficits) plus the fractionation regimen were retrospectively investigated for associations with survival. Factors significant in the multivariate analysis were included in the survival score. The score for each significant prognostic factor was determined by dividing the 6-month survival rate (%) by 10. The total score represented the sum of the scores for each factor. The prognostic groups of the test group were compared to the validation group.

RESULTS

In the multivariate analysis of the test group, performance status, ambulatory status, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, and interval from cancer diagnosis to radiotherapy were significantly associated with survival. Total scores including these factors were 20, 21, 22, 24, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 35, 37, or 39 points. In the test group, the 6-month survival rates were 6.5% for 20-24 points, 44.6% for 26-33 points, and 95.8% for 35-39 points (p < 0.0001). In the validation group, the 6-month survival rates were 7.4%, 45.4%, and 94.7%, respectively (p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

Because the survival rates of the validation group were almost identical to the test group, this score can be considered valid and reproducible.

Do patients with a limited number of brain metastases need whole-brain radiotherapy in addition to radiosurgery?

BACKGROUND

About 40% of patients with brain metastases have a very limited number of lesions and may be candidates for radiosurgery. Radiosurgery alone is superior to whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone for control of treated and new brain metastases. In patients with a good performance status, radiosurgery also resulted in better survival. However, the question is whether the results of radiosurgery alone can be further improved with additional WBRT.

METHODS

Information for this review was compiled by searching the PubMed and MEDLINE databases. Very important published meeting abstracts were also considered.

RESULTS

Based on both retrospective and prospective studies, the addition of WBRT to radiosurgery improved control of treated and new brain metastases but not survival. However, because a recurrence within the brain has a negative impact on neurocognitive function, it is important to achieve long-term control of brain metastases.

CONCLUSION

The addition of WBRT provides significant benefits. Further randomized studies including adequate assessment of neurocognitive function and a follow-up period of at least 2 years are needed to help customize the treatment for individual patients.

Prognostic factors in a series of 504 breast cancer patients with metastatic spinal cord compression

BACKGROUND

This study was performed to identify new significant prognostic factors in breast cancer patients irradiated for metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The data of 504 patients with breast cancer patients with MSCC were retrospectively analyzed with respect to posttreatment motor function, local control of MSCC, and survival. The investigated potential prognostic factors included age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance score, number of involved vertebrae, other bone metastases, visceral metastases, pretreatment ambulatory status, interval from cancer diagnosis to radiotherapy of MSCC, time developing motor deficits before radiotherapy, and the radiation schedule.

RESULTS

On multivariate analysis, better functional outcome was associated with ambulatory status prior to RT (estimate - 1.29, p < 0.001), no visceral metastases (estimate - 0.52, p = 0.020), and slower development of motor deficits (estimate + 2.47, p < 0.001). Improved local control was significantly associated with no other bone metastases (risk ratio (RR) 4.33, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.36-14.02, p = 0.013) and no visceral metastases (RR 3.02, 95% CI 1.42-6.40, p = 0.005). Improved survival was significantly associated with involvement of only 1-2 vertebrae (RR 1.27, 95% CI 1.01-1.60, p = 0.044), ambulatory status before radiotherapy (RR 1.75, 95% CI 1.23-2.50, p = 0.002), no other bone metastases (RR 1.93, 95% CI 1.18-3.13, p = 0.009), no visceral metastases (RR 7.60, 95% CI 5.39-10.84, p < 0.001), and time developing motor deficits before radiotherapy (RR 1.55, 95% CI 1.30-1.86, p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Several new independent prognostic factors were identified for treatment outcomes. These prognostic factors should be considered in future trials and may be used to develop prognostic scores for breast cancer patients with MSCC.

Do elderly patients benefit from surgery in addition to radiotherapy for treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression?

BACKGROUND

Treatment of elderly cancer patients has gained importance. One question regarding the treatment of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) is whether elderly patients benefit from surgery in addition to radiotherapy? In attempting to answer this question, we performed a matched-pair analysis comparing surgery followed by radiotherapy to radiotherapy alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Data from 42 elderly (age > 65 years) patients receiving surgery plus radiotherapy (S + RT) were matched to 84 patients (1:2) receiving radiotherapy alone (RT). Groups were matched for ten potential prognostic factors and compared regarding motor function, local control, and survival. Additional matched-pair analyses were performed for the subgroups of patients receiving direct decompressive surgery plus stabilization of involved vertebrae (DDSS, n = 81) and receiving laminectomy (LE, n = 45).

RESULTS

Improvement of motor function occurred in 21% after S + RT and 24% after RT (p = 0.39). The 1-year local control rates were 81% and 91% (p = 0.44), while the 1-year survival rates were 46% and 39% (p = 0.71). In the matched-pair analysis of patients receiving DDSS, improvement of motor function occurred in 22% after DDSS + RT and 24% after RT alone (p = 0.92). The 1-year local control rates were 95% and 89% (p = 0.62), and the 1-year survival rates were 54% and 43% (p = 0.30). In the matched-pair analysis of patients receiving LE, improvement of motor function occurred in 20% after LE + RT and 23% after RT alone (p = 0.06). The 1-year local control rates were 50% and 92% (p = 0.33). The 1-year survival rates were 32% and 32% (p = 0.55).

CONCLUSION

Elderly patients with MSCC did not benefit from surgery in addition to radiotherapy regarding functional outcome, local control of MSCC, or survival.

Resection plus whole-brain irradiation versus resection plus whole-brain irradiation plus boost for the treatment of single brain metastasis

BACKGROUND

The optimal treatment for patients with a single brain metastasis is controversial. This study investigated the value of a radiation boost given in addition to neurosurgerical resection and whole-brain irradiation (WBI).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study, outcome data of 105 patients with a single brain metastasis receiving metastatic surgery plus WBI (S + WBI) were compared to 90 patients receiving the same treatment plus a boost to the metastatic site (S + WBI + B). The outcomes that were compared included local control of the resected metastasis (LC) and overall survival (OS). In addition to the treatment regimen, eight potential prognostic factors were evaluated including age, gender, performance status, extent of metastatic resection, primary tumor type, extracerebral metastases, recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) class, and interval from first diagnosis of cancer to metastatic surgery.

RESULTS

The LC rates at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 38%, 20%, and 9%, respectively, after S + WBI, and 67%, 51%, and 33%, respectively, after S + WBI + B (p = 0.002). The OS rates at 1 year, 2 years, and 3 years were 52%, 25%, and 19%, respectively, after S + WBI, and 60%, 40%, and 26%, respectively, after S + WBI + B (p = 0.11). On multivariate analyses, improved LC was significantly associated with OP + WBI + B (p = 0.006) and total resection of the metastasis (p = 0.014). Improved OS was significantly associated with age ≤ 60 years (p = 0.028), Karnofsky Performance Score > 70 (p = 0.015), breast cancer (p = 0.041), RPA class 1 (p = 0.012), and almost with the absence of extracerebral metastases (p = 0.05).

CONCLUSION

A boost in addition to WBI significantly improved LC but not OS following resection of a single brain metastasis.

A phase II study of cetuximab and radiation in elderly and/or poor performance status patients with locally advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (N0422)

BACKGROUND

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a disease of the elderly. Seeking a tolerable but effective regimen, we tested cetuximab + radiation in elderly and/or poor performance status patients with locally advanced NSCLC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Older patients [≥ 65 years with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status of 0, 1, or 2] or younger patients (performance status of 2) received cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) i.v. on day 1 followed by weekly cetuximab 250 mg/m(2) i.v. with concomitant radiation of 6000 cGy in 30 fractions. The primary end point was the percentage who lived 11+ months.

RESULTS

This 57-patient cohort had a median age (range) of 77 years (60-87), and 12 (21%) had a performance status of 2. Forty of 57 (70%) lived 11+ months, thus exceeding the anticipated survival rate of 50%. The median survival was 15.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 13.1-19.3 months], and the median time to cancer progression was 7.2 months (95% CI 5.8-8.6 months). No treatment-related deaths occurred, but 31 patients experienced grade 3+ adverse events, most commonly fatigue, anorexia, dyspnea, rash, and dysphagia, each of which occurred in <10% of patients.

CONCLUSION

This combination merits further study in this group of patients.

Final results of a study comparing short-course and long-course radiotherapy (RT) for local control of metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC)

9522

Background: Many MSCC patients live long enough to develop a recurrence in the irradiated spinal area. This is the first prospective study comparing different RT schedules for local control (LC) of MSCC. Methods: 265 patients treated with RT alone (1/06–12/07) were included in this prospective non-randomized study. The primary goal was to compare short-course (1×8 Gy/5×4 Gy, N=131) and long-course RT (10×3 Gy/15×2.5 Gy/20×2 Gy, N=134) for 1-year LC. Secondary endpoints were motor function and 1-year survival (OS). Dutch patients received short-course, and German patients long-course RT. The analysis of LC (no MSCC recurrence in the irradiated spinal area) included the 224 patients with improvement or no change of motor deficits during RT. The difference in 1-year LC was previously reported to be 14% between short- and long-course RT. For a statistical power of 90 % (significance level 5%), ≥218 patients were required to detect this difference. Univariate analyses (UVA) for LC and OS were performed with Kaplan-Meier-method and log-rank test, multivariate analyses (MVA) with the Cox proportional hazards model. UVA and MVA for motor function were performed with the ordered-logit-model. Eleven additional factors were evaluated. Results: 1-year LC was 61% after short-course RT and 81% after long-course RT (P=0.005). On MVA, improved LC was only associated with long-course RT (P=0.018). Motor function improved in 37% after short- and 39% after long-course RT (P=0.95). Improved motor function was associated with better performance status (P=0.015), favorable tumor (P=0.034), and slower development of motor deficits (P<0.001). 1-year OS was 23% after short- and 30% after long-course RT (P=0.28). On MVA, improved OS was associated with better performance status (P<0.001), no visceral metastases (P<0.001), involvement of 1–3 vertebrae (P=0.040), ambulatory status (P=0.038), and bisphosphonates (P<0.001). Conclusions: Long-course RT was associated with better LC, similar functional outcome, and similar OS compared to short-course RT. Patients with a favorable OS prognosis should receive long-course RT, and those with a poor OS prognosis should receive short-course RT.

[Table: see text]

Scoring systems predictive of survival and local control of patients irradiated for brain metastases

2075

Background: This study was performed to create and validate scoring systems to estimate survival and intracerebral local control at 6 months of patients irradiated for brain metastases. Methods: Data of 1,797 patients irradiated for brain metastases (1,346 whole-brain radiotherapy [WBRT], 131 radiosurgery [RS], 61 WBRT + RS, 259 resection + WBRT) were retrospectively analyzed. Patients were randomly assigned to the test group (N = 1,198) or the validation group (N = 599). In the test group, multivariate analyses (MVA, Cox proportional hazards model) were performed for survival (OS) and local control (LC). Based on the MVA results, two scoring systems were developed, one for OS and another for LC. The scores included the prognostic factors found significant on MVA. Age, performance status, extracranial metastases, interval from tumor diagnosis to RT, and number of brain metastases were significant for OS. Tumor type, performance status, interval from tumor diagnosis to RT, and number of brain metastases were significant for LC. The score for each factor was determined by dividing the 6-month OS or LC rate (%) by 10. The total score represented the sum of the scores for each factor. For OS, total scores ranged from 15–30 points, and patients were divided into three groups (15–19, 20–25, and 26–30 points). For LC, total scores ranged from 14–27 points, and patients were divided into three groups (14–18, 19–23, and 24–27 points). Results: In the test group, the 6-month OS rates were 9 ± 1% for patients with scores of 15–19 points, 41 ± 2% for those with 20–25 points, and 78 ± 2% for those with 26–30 points (p < 0.0001). The corresponding OS rates in the validation group were 7 ± 2%, 39 ± 3%, and 79 ± 3%, respectively (p < 0.0001).In the test group, the 6-month LC rates were 17 ± 3% for patients with 14–18 points, 49 ± 3% for those with 19–23 points, and 77 ± 2% for those with 24–27 points (p < 0.0001). The corresponding LC rates in the validation group were 19 ± 4%, 52 ± 4%, and 77 ± 3%, respectively (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: Patients irradiated for brain metastases can be grouped with these scores to estimate OS and LC. The OS and LC rates of the validation group were almost identical to the test group, which demonstrates the high validity and reproducibility of both scores.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Development of a new micro-injection-system for adenoviral gene delivery (MAGD)

e22167

Background: Safe and effective delivery of viral vectors is important for gene therapy. Local application of such vectors is more efficient than systemic application. However, currently available injection systems are not optimal because placement of the injection needle and the vector application itself are generally not reproducibile. We developed a new injection system providing controlled injection of adenoviral vectors in tumors (xeno-transplants) in nude mice (NMRI nu/nu). Methods: The new MAGD consists of two fixation devices mounted on a 40x40cm plexi-glass plate, four injection units, and one pump unit with 4 infusion-pumps (Bee hive, Bioanalytical, Chesire, UK). Each injection unit is linked to a pump with commercially available plastic tube. Because the injection arms can be moved in x-,y- and z-direction, virus injection can easily performed for irregular tumor volumes. The entire injection volume is equally distributed to the 4 injection pumps allowing precise and steady injection rates between 0.1μl/min and 100μl/min. Success was confirmed with MRI-scans (Magnetom symphony, Siemens, Erlangen, Germany) 10 min after the injection. The efficacy of the MAGD was tested in 4 human squamous cell carcinoma cell lines from oro-/hypopharynx (FaDu, UD- SCC2, UD-SCC6, and UD-SCC7a). Virus transfection was performed with an adenovirus (serotype 5) expressing enhanced green fluorescent protein (eGFP). Transfection rates were quantified with flow cytometry. Successfully transfected cells expressed eGFP resulting in green fluorescence. In-vitro cell lines (concentration: 10 particles per cell, MOI 10) of FaDu, UD-SCC2, UD-SCC6 and UD-SCC7a served as controls. Results: The MAGD was easy to handle. Injection of 100μl (25μl per infusion pump) at an injection rate of 5μl/min took only 5 min. The in-vivo transfection rates achieved with the MAGD were 9±1% for FaDu, 39±2% for UD- SCC, 54±1% for UD-SCC6 and 54±9% for UD-SCC7a, respectively. The in-vitro transfection rates (controls) for these 4 cell lines were 2±1%, 23±4%, 29±4% and 3±2%, respectively. Conclusions: The new MAGD provided controlled injection of adenoviral vectors in tumors in nude mice. It proved to be effective, as it resulted in comparably high transfection rates.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Comparison of progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor response as endpoints for predicting overall survival (OS) in untreated extensive-stage small cell lung cancer (ED-SCLC): Findings based on North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) trials

8085

Background: Historically, tumor response has been the primary endpoint in phase II (P2) trials in ED-SCLC. We investigated the suitability of alternate PFS based endpoints to predict OS as early evidence of efficacy in the P2 setting. Methods: Individual patient (pt) data from 942 pts from 11 previously untreated ED-SCLC P2 and phase III (P3) platinum- or paclitaxel-based treatment trials were pooled. Best response (BR), response confirmed (RC), objective status at 16 weeks (RR16), and PFS rate at 5 and 6 months were considered. Percent agreement (PA) and kappa (k) for PFS5, PFS6, BR, RC, and RR16 with OS at 12 months (OS12) was calculated on a per-pt basis and predictive utility was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic (A- ROC) curve in logistic models. Cox models were used to assess the prognostic impact of the endpoints on subsequent survival, using landmark analysis. Results: The median OS and PFS were 9.6 m and 5.5 m, respectively. PFS5 and PFS6 had the highest PA, k, and A-ROC values, and were predictive of subsequent survival in the landmark analysis (p <0.0001; c-statistics ≥ 0.60). While RR16 and BR were significantly associated with subsequent survival (p<0.0001, c-statistics of 0.61 and 0.57, respectively) the PA, k, and A-ROC values were lower. Conclusions: PFS rate at 5 and 6 months is more predictive of 12-month OS and subsequent survival than tumor response in untreated ED-SCLC. PFS based endpoints should be routinely used as primary endpoints in P2 trials within ED-SCLC.

[Table: see text]

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

p53 Mutations in carcinoma of the esophagus and gastroesophageal junction

BACKGROUND

Recent studies suggested p53 mutations as a prognostic factor. Tumors of the esophagus and gastroesophageal (GE) junction show raising incidence with a general poor prognosis.

METHODS

p53 Mutational spectra in 103 patients (68 squamous cell carcinoma/SCC and 35 adenocarcinoma/AC) were compared to clinical and pathologic data.

RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

p53 Mutations were found in 26 of 68 SSC (38.2%) and in 12 of 35 AC (34.5%). We only found G > T transversions in smokers with SCC. The survival of patients was not affected by p53 mutational status. In our study, the frequency and mutational spectrum of mutant p53 is similar in both histological types without prognostic relevance.

Metastatic malignant melanoma

Metastatic malignant melanoma is an incurable malignancy with extremely poor prognosis. Patients bearing this diagnosis face a median survival time of approximately 9 months with a probability of surviving 5 years after initial presentation at less than 5%. This is contrasted by the curative nature of surgical resection of early melanoma detected in the skin. To date, no systemic therapy has consistently and predictably impacted the overall survival of patients with metastatic melanoma. However, in recent years, a resurgence of innovative diagnostic and therapeutic developments have broadened our understanding of the natural history of melanoma and identified rational therapeutic targets/strategies that seem poised to significantly change the clinical outcomes in these patients. Herein we review the state-of-the-art in metastatic melanoma diagnostics and therapeutics with particular emphasis on multi-disciplinary clinical management.

The value of combined modality therapy in elderly patients with stage III non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)

19503

Background: This study was performed to assess the value of combined modality therapy in elderly patients by comparing the differences in outcome of those who received radiotherapy (RT) alone or RT plus chemotherapy for stage III NSCLC. Methods: North Central Cancer Treatment Group (NCCTG) performed 2 recent phase III trials for stage III NSCLC. The first trial, 90–24–51, included 3 arms: once-daily radiotherapy (QDRT) alone, twice daily RT (BIDRT) alone, and concurrent chemotherapy plus BIDRT. The second trial, 94–24- 52 included 2 arms and compared concurrent chemotherapy with either QDRT or BIDRT. The chemotherapy arms of both trials included etoposide and cisplatin administered concurrently with RT. Only the patients ≥65 years of age (elderly) who participated in these trials were included in this analysis. Results: Of the 166 elderly patients included in this analysis, 37 received RT alone and 129 received concurrent chemotherapy plus RT. The median and 5-year survival rates were 10.5 months and 5.4% for the RT alone group compared to 13.7 months and 14.7% for the RT plus chemotherapy group (log-rank p=0.05). Patients who received RT plus chemotherapy experienced significantly greater severe (grade ≥3) toxicity than those who received RT alone (89.9% versus 32.4%, p < 0.01). Conclusions: Elderly patients who participated in these trials appear to gain a survival advantage from RT and chemotherapy compared to RT alone. As is the case with younger patients, this benefit comes at the cost of additional toxicity.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A front-line window of opportunity phase II study of sorafenib in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A North Central Cancer Treatment Group study

7547

Background: Sorafenib is a multikinase inhibitor with single-agent activity in previously treated NSCLC. In an effort to evaluate its single agent activity in previously untreated NSCLC, the NCCTG undertook a front-line “window of opportunity” study. Materials and Methods: Patients with stage IIIB (pleural effusion) or stage IV NSCLC received sorafenib dosed at 400 mg BID continuously, with a cycle defined as 4 weeks. Patients were evaluated weekly during the first 2 cycles with those who progressed rapidly going on to receive standard chemotherapy. Based on a two-stage Fleming design, if only at most 1 confirmed response was observed in the first 20 patients enrolled to stage I, the regimen would be considered ineffective. If 2 or more responses were observed, the study would proceed to stage 2 and accrue an additional 22 patients. If 5 or more confirmed responses were observed, the regimen would be recommended for further testing. Results: The study did not meet the stage I efficacy criteria (only 1 confirmed partial response in the first 20 patients) and was permanently closed after enrolling 25 evaluable patients [15 females, 10 males; 4 stage IIIB, 21 stage IV; median age 67 (45–85)]. 2 patients are still receiving treatment (14 and 15 months). No grade 3 or higher hematologic adverse events were observed. Thirteen (52%) patients had a grade 3 non-hematologic adverse event with fatigue (20%), diarrhea (8%), and dyspnea (8%) being the most common. There was one grade 4 pulmonary hemorrhage. A total of 3 (12%) PRs; and 7 (28%) SD were observed in the 25 patients 7 (28%) patients were progression- free at 24 weeks. Median survival and median time to progression were 8.8 and 2.9 months respectively. Conclusion: While the pre- specified efficacy endpoints were not met, the objective response rate of 12% and median survival of 8.8 months suggest that single agent sorafenib has activity similar to two-drug combinations. The feasibility and utility of the “window of opportunity” design in estimating the activity of novel compounds was demonstrated. Finally, the single-agent activity of sorafenib argues for combination studies with standard chemotherapy agents.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Age, gender, performance status and stage outperformed stage alone in predicting overall survival (OS) in patients with small cell lung cancer: A pooled analysis of 1,623 patients from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group

7723

Background: It is critical that we understand the impact of patient, tumor, and treatment-related factors on patient prognosis for the proper design and analysis of Small Cell Lung Cancer (SCLC) trials. An analysis of 15 SCLC trials was performed to investigate and improve our understanding of several factors on OS. Methods: Data from 1623 patients (pts) were used. Age, gender, performance status (PS), tumor stage, body mass index (BMI), creatinine levels, hemoglobin levels, white blood cell counts (WBC), platelet counts, and bilirubin levels were tested for prognostic significance for OS both univariately and multivariately using a Cox Proportional Hazards Model. Models were stratified by protocol, and analyses carried out on the complete data available based on the selected covariates. Model discrimination (i.e., ability to discriminate patients with different survival times) was evaluated using the concordance index (COI). Results: Median follow-up was 63.1 months (range: 1.9 to 155.7). 58% and 42% of pts had extensive-stage or limited-stage SCLC, respectively. Patients with extensive-stage disease, PS>0, increased age, and male gender had significantly worse OS both univariately and multivariately. Patients with increased WBC had significantly worse OS univariately, however, WBC was not a significant predictor when adjusted for other factors. None of the other factors were prognostic for OS. Model discrimination improved by 6.3% when age, gender, PS, and stage were included in a model compared to a model with stage alone (COI improved from 0.63 to 0.67). Conclusions: Age, gender, PS and stage did better at predicting OS than stage alone. Further refinement of this model, including the addition of number of metastatic sites at baseline and treatment related factors, is currently underway.

No significant financial relationships to disclose.

[Table: see text]

Radiotherapy is effective for metastatic spinal cord compression in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer

Ovarian cancer patients developing metastatic spinal cord compression (MSCC) are extremely rare and account for only 0.4% of MSCC patients. Only very few case reports are available in the literature. This analysis evaluates seven ovarian cancer patients treated for MSCC with radiotherapy alone. Data of 1,852 MSCC patients irradiated between 1992 and 2005 were retrospectively reviewed. Seven patients were identified with epithelial ovarian cancer. These seven patients were evaluated for functional outcome, ambulatory status, local control of MSCC, and survival. The patients received either short-course radiotherapy (1 × 8 Gy or 5 × 4 Gy, n= 2) or long-course radiotherapy (10 × 3 Gy, 15 × 2.5 Gy, or 20 × 2 Gy, n= 5). Improvement of motor function occurred in three of the seven patients, in three of the five patients after long-course radiotherapy, and none of the two patients after short-course radiotherapy. Two of the five nonambulatory patients regained the ability to walk after radiotherapy. No further deterioration of motor function was seen in another three of the seven patients, in two of the five patients after long-course radiotherapy, and one of the two patients after short-course radiotherapy. Deterioration occurred in one of the seven patients, in none of the five patients after long-course radiotherapy, and one of the two patients after short-course radiotherapy. Patients died after a median interval of 4 months (range 1–7 months) following radiotherapy. A recurrence of MSCC did not occur. Radiotherapy alone is effective in improving or maintaining motor function in MSCC patients with ovarian cancer and should be administered if decompressive surgery is not indicated.

Prognostic Value of Haemoglobin Levels During Concurrent Radio-chemotherapy in the Treatment of Oesophageal Cancer

AIMS

To evaluate the prognostic value of haemoglobin levels during radio-chemotherapy for overall survival, metastases-free survival (MFS) and locoregional control in patients with locally advanced oesophageal cancer.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Age, gender, performance status, tumour location, tumour length, histology, histologic grading, T-stage, N-stage, UICC-stage and weekly haemoglobin levels during concurrent radio-chemotherapy were retrospectively investigated and related to outcome in 108 patients, who received radio-chemotherapy for stage II/III oesophageal cancer. Radio-chemotherapy consisted of 59.4-60 Gy irradiation, two to four courses of cisplatin (75 mg/m2 on day 1) and 5-fluorouracil (1000 mg/m2 on days 1-5). Haemoglobin levels during radio-chemotherapy were compared among the following three groups: patients with over 60% of haemoglobin levels less than 12 g/dl; patients with over 60% of haemoglobin levels at 12-14 g/dl; and patients with over 60% of haemoglobin levels greater than 14 g/dl.

RESULTS

On univariate analysis, haemoglobin levels of 12-14 g/dl and greater than 14 g/dl during concurrent radio-chemotherapy provided better outcomes than haemoglobin levels less than 12 g/dl. The 2-year overall survival rates were 34%, 35% and 16%, respectively (P = 0.002). The 2-year MFS survival rates were 23%, 46% and 21%, respectively (P = 0.06). The 2-year locoregional control rates were 44%, 58% and 19%, respectively (P < 0.001). ECOG performance status (1 better than 2-3) was significantly associated with overall survival (P = 0.013), tumour length (<7 cm better than > or = 7 cm) with overall survival (P = 0.002) and MFS (P = 0.002), N-stage (N0 better than N1) with overall survival (P = 0.004) and MFS (P < 0.001), and UICC-stage (stage II better than III) with overall survival (P = 0.025) and MFS (P = 0.010). On multivariate analysis, haemoglobin levels during radio-chemotherapy maintained significance for overall survival (P = 0.002) and locoregional control (P < 0.001), tumour length for overall survival (P = 0.002) and MFS (P = 0.008), and N-stage for MFS (P = 0.003).

CONCLUSIONS

Haemoglobin during radiotherapy and concurrent radio-chemotherapy is an independent prognostic factor in oesophageal cancer treatment. To improve outcome, it seems important to maintain the haemoglobin at 12-14 g/dl.

A phase II trial of imatinib (ST1571) in patients with c-kit expressing relapsed small-cell lung cancer: a CALGB and NCCTG study

BACKGROUND

The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical activity of imatinib mesylate in patients with recurrent and refractory c-kit-expressing small-cell lung cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients with c-kit-expressing SCLC (> or =1+ by immunohistochemistry) were enrolled in two groups. Arm A included patients with disease progression <3 months and arm B included patients with disease progression > or =3 months after previous treatment. Imatinib was administered at a dose of 400 mg b.i.d. continuously, with a cycle length of 28 days. A single stage Simon design with a planned interim analysis was used to evaluate the 16-week progression free rate in each arm.

RESULTS

A total of 29 evaluable patients were entered into the study (seven in arm A, median age 68; 22 in arm B, median age 64.5). Median number of treatment cycles was one in both arms. Grade 3+ non-hematologic adverse events were seen in 15 (52%) patients, with nausea, vomiting, dyspnea, fatigue, anorexia and dehydration each occurring in at least 10% of patients. Median survival was 3.9 and 5.3 months and median time to progression was 1 and 1.1 months for arms A and B, respectively. Enrollment to arm A was temporarily suspended prior to reaching interim analysis due to striking early disease progression (29%), early deaths (29%) and patient refusal (42%). No objective responses and no confirmed stable disease > or =6 weeks were seen in either arm. Accrual was permanently terminated to both arms as only one patient was progression-free at 16 weeks.

CONCLUSION

Imatinib failed to demonstrate any clinical activity in spite of patient selection for c-kit-expressing SCLC. Our results strengthen the collective evidence that prediction of efficacy of novel therapeutic agents based on target expression, rather than pathway activation (for example, through activating mutations), may not be a valid paradigm for drug development.