Phase II trial of misonidazole (MISO) and cyclophosphamide (CYC) in metastatic renal cell carcinoma

The Therapeutic Landscape of Renal Cell Carcinoma: From the Dark Age to the Golden Age

Oncologic treatments for renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have undergone a major revolution in the past 2 decades, moving away from the pre-2004 Dark Age during which interleukin 2 and interferon-α were the only therapeutic options and induced treatment responses in only 5% to 10% of patients with metastatic disease. The development of anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitors against vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 and inhibitors of mammalian target of rapamycin complex 1 in 2005 introduced the Modern Age with better overall and progression-free survival and a greater number of patients (30%-40%) responding to and (∼80%) benefiting from these targeted therapeutic agents. The coming of age of the immuno-oncology era with the use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have ushered us into the Golden Age of metastatic RCC care, in which combined administrations of two ICIs (anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1 and anti-cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 or one tyrosine kinase inhibitor plus one ICI (anti-programmed cell death protein 1/programmed death-ligand 1) have recast the treatment landscape of clear cell RCC, the most common RCC subtype, with an approximately 60% response rate and an approximately 90% disease control rate that further improves metastatic RCC survival. Exciting clinical trials are in the pipeline investigating complementary/synergistic molecular mechanisms, based on studies investigating the biology, pathology, and genomics of renal carcinoma and the respective treatment outcome. This will enable us to enter the Diamond Age of precision medicine in which a specific treatment can be tailored to the specific biological and pathologic circumstance of an individual kidney tumor to offer more effective yet less toxic therapy.

The Pan-Omics Landscape of Renal Cell Carcinoma and Its Implication on Future Clinical Practice

Renal cell carcinoma has traditionally been classified based on histological features. Contemporary studies have identified genomic, transcriptomic, epigenomic, and metabolomic signatures that correspond to or even transcend histological subtypes. Much remains to be learned about improving the algorithm of pan-omics integration for precision oncology, which will not only advance our understanding of RCC pathobiology and treatment response but also result in novel therapeutic opportunities. Accordingly, this review focuses on recent RCC multi-omics literature. Encouragingly, a few reports on omics integration into routinely employed prognostic risk models have shown early promise that could lay the foundation for future development of precision kidney cancer therapies. Hence, this article serves as a primer on what we have learned and how we might better realize the clinical potential of the burgeoning pan-omics data.

A phase II trial of continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide and celecoxib in patients with renal cell carcinoma

PURPOSE

The lack of effective systemic therapies for patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma (RCC) has stimulated interest in evaluating novel treatment strategies for this disease.

METHODS

This was a two-institution, two-stage, phase II trial of continuous low-dose oral cyclophosphamide (50 mg daily) in combination with celecoxib (400 mg twice daily) in patients with progressive, locally advanced or metastatic RCC. The primary endpoint was disease control rate (DCR) defined as the number of patients with complete (CR) or partial response (PR) or prolonged (> or =6 months) stable disease (SD). Secondary endpoints included time to progression and toxicity.

RESULTS

Between May 2001 and January 2003, 36 patients were enrolled onto the trial of which 32 were evaluable for response. One patient had a PR and three others had SD for longer than 6 months (DCR 12.5%, 95% CI 3.5-29.0%). The median progression free survival was 3.5 months (95% CI, 1.9-4.1 months) and the median overall survival was 14.5 months (95% CI, 8.4-20.8 months). One patient experienced grade five gastrointestinal bleeding. Otherwise, the treatment was well tolerated.

CONCLUSIONS

Although generally well tolerated, continuous therapy with low-dose cyclophosphamide and celecoxib had limited activity in RCC.

Circumvention of multidrug resistance in genitourinary tumors

Chemotherapy is the principal strategy to systemically challenge metastasized cancers of genitourinary origin. Unfortunately, the efficacy of chemotherapy is often hampered by multidrug resistance, the resistance to a variety of structurally and functionally distinct cytotoxic agents. Multidrug resistance can be either intrinsic or acquired, and can be caused by several mechanisms. The so-called classical multidrug resistance, mediated by the MDR1 gene product P-glycoprotein, has been held mainly responsible for inferring the multidrug resistance phenotype on urologic malignancies. However, several other multidrug resistance pathways have been identified. Multidrug resistance can be caused by the membrane-bound multidrug-resistance-associated protein, the detoxifying glutathione metabolism, the antiapoptotic protein BCL2, and changes in levels or activity of the topoisomerase enzymes. Strategies to overcome multidrug resistance of genitourinary tumors have arisen from the better understanding of the biologic and molecular mechanisms of multidrug resistance, and have been studied in experimental and clinical settings. However, attempts to modulate multidrug resistance in clinical renal cell, bladder, prostate, and testicular cancer have not been very rewarding so far, despite the optimism that had arisen from experimental data. Nevertheless, application of novel therapies to reverse multidrug resistance and to increase efficacy of chemotherapy for urologic cancers should be further pursued, within the setting of controlled clinical trials, to improve on current strategies.

Trimetrexate in advanced renal cell carcinoma. An ECOG phase II trial

Thirty-four chemotherapy-naive, ambulatory patients with advanced renal cell cancer were treated with the non-classical antifol trimetrexate at the intravenous dose of 12 mg/m2 daily x 5 every three weeks (8 mg/m2 qd x 5 for greater than 30% bone marrow previously irradiated). One patient experienced a partial response lasting 24 weeks for a response rate of 3% (exact 95% CI, 0.1 to 15.3%). Toxicity was manageable and primarily myelosuppression, gastrointestinal, and mucosal. Trimetrexate has little activity in advanced renal cell carcinoma at this dose and schedule.

Modification of alkylating agent induced cell kill by 2-nitroimidazoles in unclamped and clamped SC 9L tumors

Enhanced cell kill has been observed when experimental tumors were treated with alkylating agents in combination with 2-nitroimidazoles (2-NI). In this study, modification of the cell kill induced by cyclophosphamide (CY) and an analog, ifosfamide (IFO), by two radiation sensitizers, misonidazole (MISO) and etanidazole (SR-2508), was measured. Three important parameters were determined: (a) the necessity for hypoxic reduction of the 2-NI to achieve an increase in tumor cell kill, (b) the optimal timing for administration of the alkylating agents and the 2-NI, and (c) the degree of enhancement of the CY- and IFO-induced cell kill. The subcutaneous (sc) 9L tumor model in male Fisher 344 rats was used in these experiments, and the endpoint measured was clonogenic cell survival 18-20 hr after treatment. Under hypoxic conditions, MISO potentiated both CY- and IFO-induced cell kill with a sensitizer enhancement ratio of approximately 1.3 and 1.5, respectively, at the 10(-3) survival level. This enhancement was seen when CY was administered simultaneously or 1.5 hr prior to MISO administration. A similar enhancement of CY-induced cell kill was measured under hypoxic conditions when SR-2508 was used. Enhanced IFO-induced cell kill was measured under hypoxic conditions only when the IFO was given 1 hr before MISO administration. No enhancement of the IFO-induced cell kill was observed when SR-2508 was used instead of MISO. Increased normal tissue damage (i.e., hemorrhagic cystitis) was observed when the MISO was administered along with CY or IFO. Four conclusions can be drawn from these data. Metabolism of the 2-NI by hypoxic cells is necessary for potentiation of CY- or IFO-induced cell kill. Only MISO can potentiate the cell kill induced by IFO. The timing of administration of the alkylating agents and the 2-NI is a critical determinant of the extent of the cell kill obtained. Cell kill induced by IFO appears to be enhanced by MISO to a greater extent than the cell kill induced by CY.

Rationale for immunotherapy of renal cell carcinoma

Metastasis to distant organs is the principal cause of death from renal cell carcinoma (RCC). No commonly accepted therapy is available for disseminated RCC at present. Immunotherapy is a mode of therapy that either interferes with the immune system or makes use of drugs that have been derived from soluble mediators of the immune system. Several lines of evidence suggest that combinations of genetically engineered cytokines (e.g. interleukin-2 and interferon alpha) may be particularly active in the treatment of advanced RCC. There are two major rationales for considering immunotherapy for RCC: (1) there is currently no other therapy available, and (2) there is hardly any innovative approach besides immunotherapy. Still, immunotherapy is far from being a standard therapy for disseminated RCC.

The in vivo response of a C3H mammary carcinoma to treatment with misonidazole, cyclophosphamide and radiation

The potential chemosensitizing effect of the nitroaromatic radiosensitizer misonidazole (MISO) on the alkylating agent cyclophosphamide (CTX), and the interactions of these agents with radiation, have been investigated in a C3H mammary carcinoma in CDF1 mice. MISO at 1,000 mg/kg caused a small increase in tumour growth time (TGT; time to reach 3 times treatment volume) from 3.6 days to 4.5 days. CTX (100 mg/kg) increased the TGT to 15.7 days. The combined treatment of MISO and CTX given with intervals of either 15 min or 4 h increased the TGT to 23.3 and 23.8 days respectively. The radiation enhancement ratio (ER) was found to be 2.13 and 1.10 for MISO administered before or after x-rays respectively. The corresponding ERs for CTX were 1.16 and 1.22. The two drugs given in combination resulted in significant radiation ERs of 2.68 (both drugs given within 30 min before x-rays), 3.00 (MISO 30 min before and CTX 3 1/2 h after x-rays) and 1.40 (both drugs given after x-rays). In contrast to what has previously been reported, and in contrast to the tumour regrowth delay data, the results of the tumour control experiments were found to reflect no more than an additive action of the two drugs when used together with radiation in vivo.

Misonidazole chemosensitization of EMT6 spheroids to melphalan

Nitroaromatic radiosensitizers are effective chemosensitizers in vitro and in vivo. We have used EMT6 tumour cells grown as multicellular spheroids to try and further understand the role that hypoxia plays in this process. Our results show that the cell killing produced in whole spheroids following a 1-h exposure to melphalan (L-PAM) was enhanced by a 3-h pre-exposure to 5 mM misonidazole (MISO), an enhancement ratio of 1.3-1.7 being obtained. Sequentially disaggregating spheroids we also found that both L-PAM toxicity and MISO chemosensitization were relatively constant as a function of depth within the spheroid. The binding of 14C-MISO to spheroid cells, measured by scintillation counting of disaggregated cells and by autoradiography analysis of sectioned spheroids, demonstrated that binding increased with depth. However, cells in the outer layers of the spheroid bound more 14C-MISO than expected with fully aerobic cells, while in the innermost viable cells the binding was less than that measured in cells which were fully radiobiologically hypoxic. This suggests that the majority of viable spheroid cells were at oxygen tensions intermediate between those found in either fully aerobic or radiobiologically hypoxic cells, yet their levels of oxygenation were sufficiently low for MISO chemosensitization to occur.

A randomized study of CCNU with and without benznidazole in the treatment of recurrent grades 3 and 4 astrocytoma. Report to the Medical Research Council by the Brain Tumor Working Party

In a randomized, double-blind study, 44 patients with recurrent high grade malignant glioma were allocated to chemotherapy of CCNU, with or without benznidazole (BENZO). Of 42 eligible patients, 23 received CCNU alone, and 19 CCNU received BENZO. Only 8 patients received the full 6 courses of treatment. The mean number of courses given was 2.8 for placebo and 3.4 for benznidazole patients. Progressive disease caused termination of treatment early for the majority of patients. There was no evidence of increased toxicity-leucopenia, anemia or thrombocytopenia-in the BENZO group, and only one patient in each treatment group had chemotherapy terminated because of toxicity. The BENZO group did not demonstrate any survival advantage: median survival time was 25 weeks in the BENZO group and 30 weeks in the placebo group. The confidence interval for the treatment difference is wide but excludes a BENZO-related addition of more than 7 months to the median survival time.