Concomitant boost radiotherapy schedules in the treatment of carcinoma of the oropharynx and nasopharynx

A Comparison of the Toxicities in Patients With Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancers Treated With Concomitant Boost Radiotherapy Versus Conventional Chemoradiation

PURPOSE

To compare the objective and patient-reported toxicities of concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT) and concurrent chemoradiation (CRT) in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers.

METHODS AND MATERIAL

In this prospective study, 46 patients with histologically proven stage III-IVA head and neck cancer were randomly assigned to receive either concurrent chemoradiation to a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks with concurrent cisplatin (40 mg/m2 IV weekly; control arm) or accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost radiotherapy (study arm) to a dose of 67.5 Gy in 40 fractions in five weeks. Acute toxicity was evaluated using RTOG toxicity criteria. The assessment was done weekly after initiation of treatment, at the first follow-up (six weeks), and at three months. The four main patient-reported symptoms of pain, hoarseness of voice, dryness of mouth, and loss of taste were also compared between the two groups to assess patient quality of life during treatment.

RESULTS

The mean treatment duration was 37 days in the CBRT arm and 49 days in the CRT arm. Treatment-related interruptions were less in the study group,17.3% in the study, and 27.2% in the control with insignificant P-value. Grade III laryngeal toxicity was significantly higher in the study group (P=0.029). Other acute grade I-III toxicities (pharyngeal, skin, mucositis, and salivary) were comparable in both CRT and CBRT arms. Grade IV toxicities were seen only in the CBRT arm but were resolved at the first follow-up. Haematological toxicities and renal toxicities were significantly higher in the CRT arm, with significant P-values of 0.0004 and 0.018, respectively.

CONCLUSION

In patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer, concomitant boost radiotherapy is well tolerated with acceptable local toxicity and minimal systemic toxicity as compared to conventional chemoradiation. It is a feasible option for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer not fit for concurrent chemoradiation.

Escalating a Biological Dose of Radiation in the Target Volume Applying Stereotactic Radiosurgery in Patients with Head and Neck Region Tumours

Background: The treatment of head and neck tumours is a complicated process usually involving surgery, radiation therapy, and systemic treatment. Despite the multidisciplinary approach, treatment outcomes are still unsatisfactory, especially considering malignant tumours such as squamous cell carcinoma or sarcoma, where the frequency of recurrence has reached 50% of cases. The implementation of modern and precise methods of radiotherapy, such as a radiosurgery boost, may allow for the escalation of the biologically effective dose in the gross tumour volume and improve the results of treatment. Methods: The administration of a stereotactic radiotherapy boost can be done in two ways: an upfront boost followed by conventional radio(chemo)therapy or a direct boost after conventional radio(chemo)therapy. The boost dose depends on the primary or nodal tumour volume and localization regarding the organs at risk. It falls within the range of 10–18 Gy. Discussion: The collection of detailed data on the response of the disease to the radiosurgery boost combined with conventional radiotherapy as well as an assessment of early and late toxicities will contribute crucial information to the prospective modification of fractionated radiotherapy. In the case of beneficial findings, the stereotactic radiosurgery boost in the course of radio(chemo)therapy in patients with head and neck tumours will be able to replace traditional techniques of radiation, and radical schemes of treatment will be possible for future development.

Retropharyngeal Internal Carotid Artery Management in TORS Using Microvascular Reconstruction

OBJECTIVES

Guidelines for transoral robotic surgery (TORS) have generally regarded patients with retropharyngeal carotid arteries as contraindicated for surgery due to a theoretical risk of intraoperative vascular injury and/or perioperative cerebrovascular accident. We aimed to demonstrate that careful TORS-assisted resection and free flap coverage could not only avoid intraoperative injury and provide a physical barrier for vessel coverage but also achieve adequate margin control.

STUDY DESIGN

Retrospective cohort analysis.

METHODS

Retrospective review of patients with oropharyngeal malignancies and radiologically confirmed retropharyngeal carotid arteries who underwent TORS, concurrent neck dissection, and free flap reconstruction between 2015 and 2019.

RESULTS

Twenty patients were included, 19 (95.0%) with tonsillar tumors and one (5.0%) with a tongue base tumor with significant tonsillar extension. Eighteen patients (90.0%) received a radial artery forearm flap, one (5.0%) an ulnar artery forearm flap, and one (5.0%) an anteromedial thigh flap. All 20 (100%) flaps were inset through combined transcervical and transoral approaches without mandibulotomy. There were no perioperative mortalities, carotid injuries, oropharyngeal bleeds, cervical hematomas, or cerebrovascular accidents. One patient (5.0%) had a free flap failure requiring explant. All patients underwent decannulation and resumed a full oral diet. The mean length of hospitalization was 6.8 (standard deviation 1.2) days. One (5.0%) patient had a positive margin.

CONCLUSION

In this analysis, 20 patients with oropharyngeal malignancy and retropharyngeal carotid arteries underwent TORS, neck dissection, and microvascular reconstruction without serious complication (perioperative mortality, vascular injury, or neurologic sequalae) with an acceptable negative margin rate. These results may lead to a reconsideration of a commonly held contraindication to TORS.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

3 Laryngoscope, 131:E821-E827, 2021.

Altered Fractionation Schedules in Radiotherapy of Head and Neck Cancer. A Review

The authors review the main contributions of international literature to show the current status in clinical trials on unconventional fractionations of the dose in radiotherapy of head and neck cancers. Several clinical (but only a few randomized) trials have been conducted over the last 15 years using hyperfractionated (HF), accelerated (AF) or mixed (HF-AF) schedules. HF schedules have obtained promising results in terms of local control in comparison with conventional fractionation (CF) of the dose. Improvement in survival was also obtained by the random trials of Pinto and Sanchiz, whereas in EORTC trial no. 22791, the improvement in survival rate was only marginal. A significant increase in local control and, less frequently, in survival has been claimed in several studies using HF-AF. Such data still need to be confirmed by a random study, since EORTC trial 22811 showed superimposable results in comparison with CF. Selection of the most suitable cases for altered fractionation schemes is also being studied in ongoing trials of the EORTC (22851) and RTOG (90-03). As regards acute reactions during and after altered fractionation, they are more severe than after CF. Only pure HF with a dose intensity approximately comparable to CF seems to produce similar acute reactions. Several factors have been found to influence the severity of acute mucosal reactions: interfraction interval, overall treatment time, total dose, and field size. As regards late damage, genuine HF schemes seem to cause roughly equivalent late damage in comparison to CF, whereas high-dose intensity schedules have a higher rate of complications. Interfraction interval, overall treatment time, total dose, fraction size and field size can influence the risk of late sequelae. Before altered fractionations can be considered standard therapy, more data are needed, which should be provided by multicentric randomized trials, some of which are already in progress.

Efficacy and toxicity profiles of two chemoradiotherapies for stage II laryngeal cancer - a comparison between late course accelerated hyperfractionation (LCAHF) and conventional fractionation (CF)

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the treatment results of late course accelerated hyperfractionation (LCAHF) compared with conventional fractionation (CF) for stage II laryngeal cancer.

METHODS

Fifty-nine consecutive patients treated for stage II laryngeal cancer were retrospectively reviewed. Thirty-two patients underwent LCAHF, twice-daily fractions during the latter half with a total dose of 69 Gy. Twenty-seven patients received CF of 70 Gy.

RESULTS

The local control rates (LCRs), overall survival (OS), and disease-specific survival (DSS) at 5 years were 80.6%, 74.0%, and 90.4%, respectively, after LCAHF and 64.7%, 68.2%, and 90.5%, respectively, after CF. There were no significant differences in LCR, OS, and DSS (p = .11, 0.68, and 0.69, respectively). In a small number of patients with supraglottic cancer, LCAHF was associated with a significantly higher LCR at 5 years compared with CF (100% vs. 41.7%; p = .02).

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first report that compared the results of LCAHF and CF for stage II laryngeal cancer. We could not find significant differences in LCR, DSS, and OS rates between LCAHF and CF groups. Although in a small number of patients with supraglottic cancer, LCAHF may improve the LCR compared with CF.

Accelerated Radiation Therapy Using Weekend Boost with Concurrent Cisplatin in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Cancers: An Indian Institutional Experience

PURPOSE

The purpose of the study was to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of an accelerated radiotherapy schedule using weekend boost in terms of tumor response, compliance, and acute toxicities for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, and to report long-term clinical outcomes.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Twenty-six patients with stages III-IV head and neck squamous cell carcinoma receiving radical chemoradiotherapy were accrued prospectively into the study. External beam radiation therapy to a total dose of 66-70 Gy in 33-35 fractions, 1.8-2.0 Gy per fraction along with concurrent weekly cisplatin was planned. Radiation regimen included delivery of six fractions per week, with boost field delivered as the sixth fraction on the weekend. The compliance, tumor response, and toxicities were recorded. Survival curves were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method.

RESULTS

Twenty-one of 26 patients (81%) completed treatment as planned and five patients died during the course of treatment. Sixteen patients (62%) completed treatment in less than 44 days and, at the end of 3 months' follow-up, 18 patients (69%) showed complete response and two patients (8%) showed partial response. The 2- and 5-year actuarial disease-free survival were 90% and 65%, respectively, and 2- and 5-year actuarial overall survival were 60% and 38%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Accelerated fractionation using weekend boost, along with concurrent weekly concurrent cisplatin, is an effective and promising approach with favorable impact on initial tumor response, comparable results, and acceptable toxicities.

Radiation therapy (with or without neck surgery) for phenotypic human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer

BACKGROUND

Favorable outcomes for human papillomavirus-associated oropharyngeal cancer have led to interest in identifying a subgroup of patients with the lowest risk of disease recurrence after therapy. De-intensification of therapy for this group may result in survival outcomes that are similar to those associated with current therapy but with less toxicity. To advance this effort, this study analyzed the outcomes of oropharyngeal cancer patients treated with or without systemic therapy.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients with oropharyngeal cancer treated between 1985 and 2012. The criteria for inclusion were ≤10 pack-years of cigarette smoking and stage III/IVA cancer limited to T1-3, N1-N2b, and T3N0 disease. A survival analysis was performed with the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS).

RESULTS

The cohort included 857 patients. Systemic therapy was given to 439 patients (51%). The median survival was 80 months. The 2-year PFS rate was 91%. When the analysis was limited to 324 patients irradiated without systemic therapy, the 2- and 5-year PFS rates were 90% and 85%, respectively. Furthermore, for these 324 patients, the 5-year PFS rates for T1, T2, and T3 disease were 90%, 83%, and 70%, respectively. The 5-year PFS rate for patients treated with systemic therapy for T3 disease was 77% (P = .07).

CONCLUSIONS

According to the low-risk definition currently established in cooperative trials, the patients had a 2-year PFS rate approximating 90%. When patients who were treated with radiation alone were evaluated, no compromise was observed in this high rate of PFS, which is higher than the 2-year PFS thresholds used in current cooperative trials. Cancer 2016;122:1702-7. © 2016 American Cancer Society.

Randomized phase III trial to test accelerated versus standard fractionation in combination with concurrent cisplatin for head and neck carcinomas in the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0129 trial: long-term report of efficacy and toxicity

PURPOSE

We tested the efficacy and toxicity of cisplatin plus accelerated fractionation with a concomitant boost (AFX-C) versus standard fractionation (SFX) in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma (LA-HNC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had stage III to IV carcinoma of the oral cavity, oropharynx, hypopharynx, or larynx. Radiation therapy schedules were 70 Gy in 35 fractions over 7 weeks (SFX) or 72 Gy in 42 fractions over 6 weeks (AFX-C). Cisplatin doses were 100 mg/m(2) once every 3 weeks for two (AFX-C) or three (SFX) cycles. Toxicities were scored by using National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria 2.0 and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer criteria. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates were estimated by using the Kaplan-Meier method and were compared by using the one-sided log-rank test. Locoregional failure (LRF) and distant metastasis (DM) rates were estimated by using the cumulative incidence method and Gray's test.

RESULTS

In all, 721 of 743 patients were analyzable (361, SFX; 360, AFX-C). At a median follow-up of 7.9 years (range, 0.3 to 10.1 years) for 355 surviving patients, no differences were observed in OS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.79 to 1.18; P = .37; 8-year survival, 48% v 48%), PFS (HR, 1.02; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.24; P = .52; 8-year estimate, 42% v 41%), LRF (HR, 1.08; 95% CI, 0.84 to 1.38; P = .78; 8-year estimate, 37% v 39%), or DM (HR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.56 to 1.24; P = .16; 8-year estimate, 15% v 13%). For oropharyngeal cancer, p16-positive patients had better OS than p16-negative patients (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.21 to 0.42; P < .001; 8-year survival, 70.9% v 30.2%). There were no statistically significant differences in the grade 3 to 5 acute or late toxicities between the two arms and p-16 status.

CONCLUSION

When combined with cisplatin, AFX-C neither improved outcome nor increased late toxicity in patients with LA-HNC. Long-term high survival rates in p16-positive patients with oropharyngeal cancer support the ongoing efforts to explore deintensification.

Impact of radiotherapy boost on pathological complete response in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to quantify the pathological complete response (pCR) rate after preoperative (chemo)radiation with doses of ⩾60Gy in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer. Complete response is relevant since this could select a proportion of patients for which organ-preserving strategies might be possible. Furthermore, we investigated correlations between EQD2 dose and pCR-rate, toxicity or resectability, and additionally between pCR-rate and chemotherapy, boost-approach or surgical-interval.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane libraries were searched with the terms 'radiotherapy', 'boost' and 'rectal cancer' and synonym terms. Studies delivering a preoperative dose of ⩾60 Gy were eligible for inclusion. Original English full texts that allowed intention-to-treat pCR-rate calculation were included. Study variables, including pCR, acute grade ⩾3 toxicity and resectability-rate, were extracted by two authors independently. Eligibility for meta-analysis was assessed by critical appraisal. Heterogeneity and pooled estimates were calculated for all three outcomes. Pearson correlation coefficients were calculated between the variables mentioned earlier.

RESULTS

The search identified 3377 original articles, of which 18 met our inclusion criteria (1106 patients). Fourteen studies were included for meta-analysis (487 patients treated with ⩾60 Gy). pCR-rate ranged between 0.0% and 44.4%. Toxicity ranged between 1.3% and 43.8% and resectability-rate between 34.0% and 100%. Pooled pCR-rate was 20.4% (95% CI 16.8-24.5%), with low heterogeneity (I2 0.0%, 95% CI 0.00-84.0%). Pooled acute grade ⩾3 toxicity was 10.3% (95% CI 5.4-18.6%) and pooled resectability-rate was 89.5% (95% CI 78.2-95.3%).

CONCLUSION

Dose escalation above 60 Gy for locally advanced rectal cancer results in high pCR-rates and acceptable early toxicity. This observation needs to be further investigated within larger randomized controlled phase 3 trials in the future.

[Intensity-modulated radiation therapy and stereotactic body radiation therapy for head and neck tumors: evidence-based medicine]

Over the last decade, there have been many technical advances in radiation therapy, such as the spread of intensity-modulated conformal radiotherapy, and the rise of stereotactic body radiation therapy. By allowing better dose-to-target conformation and thus better organs at risk-sparing, these techniques seem very promising, particularly in the field of head and neck tumors. The present work aims at analyzing the level of evidence and recommendation supporting the use of high-technology radiotherapy in head and neck neoplasms, by reviewing the available literature.

Final results of local-regional control and late toxicity of RTOG 9003: a randomized trial of altered fractionation radiation for locally advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE

To test whether altered radiation fractionation schemes (hyperfractionation [HFX], accelerated fractionation, continuous [AFX-C], and accelerated fractionation with split [AFX-S]) improved local-regional control (LRC) rates for patients with squamous cell cancers (SCC) of the head and neck when compared with standard fractionation (SFX) of 70 Gy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients with stage III or IV (or stage II base of tongue) SCC (n=1076) were randomized to 4 treatment arms: (1) SFX, 70 Gy/35 daily fractions/7 weeks; (2) HFX, 81.6 Gy/68 twice-daily fractions/7 weeks; (3) AFX-S, 67.2 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks with a 2-week rest after 38.4 Gy; and (4) AFX-C, 72 Gy/42 fractions/6 weeks. The 3 experimental arms were to be compared with SFX.

RESULTS

With patients censored for LRC at 5 years, only the comparison of HFX with SFX was significantly different: HFX, hazard ratio (HR) 0.79 (95% confidence interval 0.62-1.00), P=.05; AFX-C, 0.82 (95% confidence interval 0.65-1.05), P=.11. With patients censored at 5 years, HFX improved overall survival (HR 0.81, P=.05). Prevalence of any grade 3, 4, or 5 toxicity at 5 years; any feeding tube use after 180 days; or feeding tube use at 1 year did not differ significantly when the experimental arms were compared with SFX. When 7-week treatments were compared with 6-week treatments, accelerated fractionation appeared to increase grade 3, 4 or 5 toxicity at 5 years (P=.06). When the worst toxicity per patient was considered by treatment only, the AFX-C arm seemed to trend worse than the SFX arm when grade 0-2 was compared with grade 3-5 toxicity (P=.09).

CONCLUSIONS

At 5 years, only HFX improved LRC and overall survival for patients with locally advanced SCC without increasing late toxicity.

Final results of a phase II single-institutional trial with hyperfractionated radiation therapy (HFX) and four-weekly continuous cisplatin in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma

BACKGROUND

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of hyperfractionated radiation therapy and continuous infusion of cisplatin on weeks 1 and 5 in locally advanced head and neck carcinoma.

METHODS

There were 53 patients: 3 (5.7 %) T2 patients, 31 T3 patients (58.4 %), and 19 T4 patients (35.8 %). Forty-one patients (77.4 %) were N-positive. According to the AJCC, 40 (75.4 %) patients had stage IV and the rest stage III. Treatment consisted of hyperfractionated radiation therapy, 120 cGy bid to a dose of 76.8-81.6 Gy, and cisplatin 20 mg/m(2)/day administered by continuous infusion over 120 h during days 1-5 and 21-25 of radiation therapy.

RESULTS

Tumor response and toxicity There were 40 (75.5 %) complete responses, 6 partial responses (11.3 %), and 5 (9.4 %) non-responses or progression. Two patients were non-evaluable for response due to toxic death. All patients had some acute toxicity grade, the most frequent being mucositis (grade 3-4 in 33 patients) and epithelitis (grade 3-4 in 30 patients). Regarding late toxicity, only 2/24 long-term survivors had tracheostomy, and none of them needed enteral nutrition. Survival and local control With a median follow-up of 66 months, the 5-year overall survival rate for all the series was 49.1 % (95 % CI 58.9-39.3 %) with a median survival duration of 32.83 months. Five-year local control was 68.4 % (95 % CI 81.3-55.5 %).

CONCLUSIONS

Hyperfractionated radiation therapy and continuous infusion of cisplatin during weeks 1 and 5 are an active treatment in patients with LAHNC. Nevertheless, new strategies are necessary to increase the local control rates and reduce the incidence of distant metastasis and second tumors.

[IMRT and head and neck tumors: does differential fractionation have a role?]

For head and neck cancer, intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) provides benefits in terms of coverage of the target tumour volume and reduction of the dose to organs at risk. Altered fractionation called SMART (simultaneous modulated accelerated radiation therapy) or SIB (simultaneous integrated boost), equivalent to the "concomitant boost" of conventional techniques, provides additional theoretical gain in the therapeutic index and simplifies the practical implementation of the treatment. The impact on tumour control and acute and late toxicities is encouraging but needs to be confirmed by prospective clinical studies with sufficient follow-up. A lot of different protocols have been tested without really bringing out a "gold standard". However, the current results tend to suggest a SIB/SMART-IMRT moderately accelerated without combined chemotherapy for limited stages (I and II), and SIB-IMRT slightly accelerated with induction and/or concomitant chemotherapy for more advanced stages (III and IV).

Comparison of concomitant boost radiotherapy against concurrent chemoradiation in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancers: a phase III randomised trial

PURPOSE

To test the toxicity and efficacy of concomitant boost radiotherapy alone against concurrent chemoradiation (conventional fractionation) in locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer in our patient population.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In this open-label, randomised trial, 216 patients with histologically proven Stage III-IVA oropharyngeal cancer were randomly assigned between June 2006 and December 2010 to receive either chemoradiation (CRT) to a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks with concurrent cisplatin (100 mg/m(2) on days 1, 22 and 43) or accelerated radiotherapy with concomitant boost (CBRT) to a dose of 67.5 Gy in 40 fractions over 5 weeks. The compliance, toxicity and quality of life were investigated. Disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) curves were estimated with the Kaplan-Meier method and compared using log rank test.

RESULTS

The compliance to radiotherapy was superior in concomitant boost with lesser treatment interruptions (p=0.004). Expected acute toxicities were significantly higher in CRT, except for grade 3/4 mucositis which was seen more in CBRT arm (39% and 55% in CRT and CBRT, respectively; p=0.02). Late toxicities like Grade 3 xerostomia were significantly high in CRT arm than CBRT arm (33% versus 18%; p<0.0001). The quality of life was significantly poor in CRT arm at all follow up visits (p<0.0001). The rates of 2 year disease-free survival were similar with 56% in the chemoradiotherapy group and 61% in CBRT group (p=0.2; HR-0.81, 95%CI-0.53-1.2). Subgroup analysis revealed that patients with nodal size >2 cm had significantly better DFS with CRT (p=0.05; HR-1.59, 95%CI-0.93-2.7).

CONCLUSION

In selected patients of locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer, concomitant boost offers a better compliance, toxicity profile and quality of life with similar disease control, than chemoradiation.

Altered-fractionated radiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

To revisit the biologic rationale, the clinical methodology, the outcome and perspectives of altered fractionation in head and neck oncology.

RECENT FINDINGS

Various prospective trials and meta-analyses clearly underline the major benefit patients with locally advanced disease draw from hyperfractionation and the need for an adequate selection of time-dose factors to optimize therapeutic index for accelerated regimens. In addition, the advent of high-precision techniques such as intensity-modulated radiation therapy is bound to favor the development of more intensive regimens of irradiation in the management of locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinomas.

SUMMARY

Altered fractionation, both as stand-alone strategy or as part of approaches combining radiation to systemic treatments, is offering a lot of opportunities to the radiation oncologist. Its role is likely to gain ground in all high-risk patients not amenable to systemic treatments, or for whom the high toxicity of chemotherapy is not justified, in case, for instance, of intermediate-risk disease.

Effect of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on the risk of mucositis during intensity-modulated radiation therapy for oropharyngeal cancer

PURPOSE

To define the roles of radiotherapy and chemotherapy on the risk of Grade 3+ mucositis during intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for oropharyngeal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

164 consecutive patients treated with IMRT at two institutions in nonoverlapping treatment eras were selected. All patients were treated with a dose painting approach, three dose levels, and comprehensive bilateral neck treatment under the supervision of the same radiation oncologist. Ninety-three patients received concomitant chemotherapy (cCHT) and 14 received induction chemotherapy (iCHT). Individual information of the dose received by the oral mucosa (OM) was extracted as absolute cumulative dose-volume histogram (DVH), corrected for the elapsed treatment days and reported as weekly (w) DVH. Patients were seen weekly during treatment, and peak acute toxicity equal to or greater than confluent mucositis at any point during the course of IMRT was considered the endpoint.

RESULTS

Overall, 129 patients (78.7%) reached the endpoint. The regions that best discriminated between patients with/without Grade 3+ mucositis were found at 10.1 Gy/w (V10.1) and 21 cc (D21), along the x-axis and y-axis of the OM-wDVH, respectively. On multivariate analysis, D21 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.016, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.009-1.023, p < 0.001) and cCHT (OR = 4.118, 95% CI, 1.659-10.217, p = 0.002) were the only independent predictors. However, V10.1 and D21 were highly correlated (rho = 0.954, p < 0.001) and mutually interchangeable. cCHT would correspond to 88.4 cGy/w to at least 21 cc of OM.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy and chemotherapy act independently in determining acute mucosal toxicity; cCHT increases the risk of mucosal Grade 3 toxicity ≈4 times over radiation therapy alone, and it is equivalent to an extra ≈6.2 Gy to 21 cc of OM over a 7-week course.

Swallowing, nutrition and patient-rated functional outcomes at 6 months following two non-surgical treatments for T1-T3 oropharyngeal cancer

PURPOSE

Altered fractionation radiotherapy with concomitant boost (AFRT-CB) may be considered an alternative treatment for patients not appropriate for chemoradiation (CRT). As functional outcomes following AFRT-CB have been minimally reported, this exploratory paper describes the outcomes of patients managed with AFRT-CB or CRT at 6 months post-treatment.

METHODS

Using a cross-sectional analysis design, functional outcomes of 14 AFRT-CB and 17 CRT patients with T1-T3 oropharyngeal cancers were explored at 6 months post-treatment. Clinical and instrumental swallow assessments, weight and nutritional status, and the functional impact of treatment were examined.

RESULTS

Inferior outcomes were observed for the CRT patients on the RBHOMS (p = 0.03) which was reflected in diet and fluid restrictions with 18% of the CRT group requiring modified fluids and diets. Although a trend (p = 0.07) was noted for increased lingual deficits and aspiration risk for fluids in the CRT group, no other significant differences were observed. Both groups experienced an average of 10 kg weight loss and reported reduced general and swallowing-related function.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data suggest functional outcomes following AFRT-CB and CRT were largely comparable at 6 months post-treatment. Treatment intensification in any form may contribute to impaired function which requires multidimensional intervention. Larger cohort investigations with systematic methodology are needed to further examine these initial findings.

Larynx preservation with primary non-surgical treatment for loco-regionally advanced larynx cancer

INTRODUCTION

The objective of this paper was to review the results of primary non-surgical treatment with the aim of larynx preservation for loco-regionally advanced larynx cancer (LALC).

METHODS

All patients with LALC presenting between January 2002 and December 2006 who were selected for primary non-surgical treatment were included in this study.

RESULTS

There were 60 patients, 48% with stage III and 52% with stage IV disease. The median follow-up of living patients was 41 months. Larynx preservation with local disease control was achieved in 83% and 77% of patients at 3 and 5 years, respectively. Failure-free survival at 3 and 5 years was 66% and 59%, respectively, and overall survival was 67% and 45%, respectively. All patients with larynx preservation had a functional voice. Two patients became feeding tube dependant. Thirty-nine percent of all deaths were unrelated to LALC.

CONCLUSIONS

Primary non-surgical treatment achieves high rates of larynx preservation with a low rate of severe complications but overall survival remains disappointing.

IsoBED: a tool for automatic calculation of biologically equivalent fractionation schedules in radiotherapy using IMRT with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) technique

Background

An advantage of the Intensity Modulated Radiotherapy (IMRT) technique is the feasibility to deliver different therapeutic dose levels to PTVs in a single treatment session using the Simultaneous Integrated Boost (SIB) technique. The paper aims to describe an automated tool to calculate the dose to be delivered with the SIB-IMRT technique in different anatomical regions that have the same Biological Equivalent Dose (BED), i.e. IsoBED, compared to the standard fractionation.

Methods

Based on the Linear Quadratic Model (LQM), we developed software that allows treatment schedules, biologically equivalent to standard fractionations, to be calculated. The main radiobiological parameters from literature are included in a database inside the software, which can be updated according to the clinical experience of each Institute. In particular, the BED to each target volume will be computed based on the alpha/beta ratio, total dose and the dose per fraction (generally 2 Gy for a standard fractionation). Then, after selecting the reference target, i.e. the PTV that controls the fractionation, a new total dose and dose per fraction providing the same isoBED will be calculated for each target volume.

Results

The IsoBED Software developed allows: 1) the calculation of new IsoBED treatment schedules derived from standard prescriptions and based on LQM, 2) the conversion of the dose-volume histograms (DVHs) for each Target and OAR to a nominal standard dose at 2Gy per fraction in order to be shown together with the DV-constraints from literature, based on the LQM and radiobiological parameters, and 3) the calculation of Tumor Control Probability (TCP) and Normal Tissue Complication Probability (NTCP) curve versus the prescribed dose to the reference target.

A prospective investigation of swallowing, nutrition, and patient-rated functional impact following altered fractionation radiotherapy with concomitant boost for oropharyngeal cancer

Altered fractionation radiotherapy for head and neck cancer has been associated with improved locoregional control, overall survival, and heightened toxicity compared with conventional treatment. Swallowing, nutrition, and patient-perceived function for altered fractionation radiotherapy with concomitant boost (AFRT-CB) for T1-T3 oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) have not been previously reported. Fourteen consecutive patients treated with AFRT-CB for oropharyngeal SCC were recruited from November 2006 to August 2009 in a tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia. Swallowing, nutrition, and patient-perceived functional impact assessments were conducted pretreatment, at 4-6 weeks post-treatment, and at 6 months post-treatment. Deterioration from pretreatment to 4-6 weeks post-treatment in swallowing, nutrition, and functional impact was evident, likely due to the heightened toxicity associated with AFRT-CB. There was significant improvement at 6 months post-treatment in functional swallowing, nutritional status, patient-perceived swallowing, and overall function, consistent with recovery from acute toxicity. However, weight and patient perception of physical function and side effects remained significantly worse than pretreatment scores. The ongoing deficits related to weight and patient-perceived outcomes at 6 months revealed that this treatment has a long-term impact on function possibly related to the chronic effects of AFRT-CB.

Are cancer stem cells radioresistant?

Based on findings that cancer cell clonogens exhibit stem cell features, it has been suggested that cancer stem-like cells are relatively radioresistant owing to different intrinsic and extrinsic factors, including quiescence, activated radiation response mechanisms (e.g., enhanced DNA repair, upregulated cell cycle control mechanisms and increased free-radical scavengers) and a surrounding microenvironment that enhances cell survival mechanisms (e.g., hypoxia and interaction with stromal elements). However, these radiosensitivity features are probably dynamic in nature and come into play at different times during the course of chemo/radiotherapy. Therefore, different molecularly targeted radiosensitization strategies may be needed at different stages of therapy. This article describes potential sensitization approaches based on the dynamics and changing properties of cancer stem-like cells during therapy.

Pretreatment prognostic factors of survival in patients with locally advanced nonmetastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiation therapy with or without concurrent chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

Identification of pretreatment prognostic factors influencing overall survival (OS) in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck is an important issue in head and neck oncology.

METHODS

A total of 289 patients were treated with standard fraction or hyperfractionated radiation therapy with or without concurrent low-dose daily chemotherapy.

RESULTS

Gender (P = 0.43) and age (P = 0.26) did not influence OS whereas Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) (P < 0.0001), T stage (P < 0.0001), and N stage (P < 0.0001) did. Stage grouping was another factor that influenced OS (P < 0.001). Patients with larynx and nasopharynx fared better than those with other primaries (P = 0.0153). Finally, treatment significantly influenced OS. Multivariate analysis showed that KPS, T and N stage, and treatment were independent prognosticators of OS.

CONCLUSIONS

KPS, T and N stage, and treatment are independent prognosticators of OS in patients with locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck treated with radiation therapy with or without concurrent low-dose daily chemotherapy.

Induction chemotherapy and cetuximab for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results from a phase II prospective trial

PURPOSE To determine the potential efficacy of combining cetuximab with chemotherapy in patients with advanced nodal disease, we conducted a phase II trial with induction chemotherapy (ICT) consisting of six weekly cycles of paclitaxel 135 mg/m(2) and carboplatin (area under the curve = 2) with cetuximab 400 mg/m(2) in week 1 and then 250 mg/m(2) (PCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Forty-seven previously untreated patients (41 with oropharynx primaries; 33 men, 14 women; median age, 53 years; performance status of 0 or 1) with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck (SCCHN; T1-4, N2b/c/3) were treated and evaluated for clinical and radiographic response. After ICT, patients underwent risk-based local therapy, which consisted of either radiation, concomitant chemoradiotherapy, or surgery, based on tumor stage and site at diagnosis. Results After induction PCC, nine patients (19%) achieved a complete response, and 36 patients (77%) achieved a partial response. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicity was skin rash (45%), followed by neutropenia (21%) without fever. At a median follow-up time of 33 months, locoregional or systemic disease progression was observed in six patients. The 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) rates were 87% (95% CI, 78% to 97%) and 91% (95% CI, 84% to 99%), respectively. Human papillomavirus (HPV) 16, found in 12 (46%) of 26 biopsies, was associated with improved PFS (P = .012) and OS (P = .046). CONCLUSION ICT with weekly PCC followed by risk-based local therapy seems to be feasible, effective, and well tolerated. PFS is promising, and this sequential treatment strategy should be further investigated. Patients with HPV-positive tumors have an excellent prognosis.

Cancer stem cells and tumor response to therapy: current problems and future prospects

The presence of a subpopulation of cells within tumors, so-called cancer stemlike cells, that is uniquely capable of reestablishing the tumor during and after definitive radio(chemo)therapy and must be effectively controlled for a long-term cure is being increasingly appreciated. The existence and physiology of a rare cancer cell population, termed cancer cell clonogens, with similar properties has been extensively described in the radiobiology literature for several decades based on studies using tumor cells transplanted into syngeneic or immunodeficient animals. The earlier studies have identified important features that govern tumor establishment; tumor growth and homeostasis; and therapeutic resistance, including clonogen number, tumor type, vascular status, hypoxia, repopulation dynamics during treatment, and immunologic and microenvironmental status. These discoveries led to therapeutic strategies, some of which have shown efficacy and have become current standard clinical practice (eg, concomitant boost and concurrent radio chemotherapy). Although the identity of cancer stemlike cells and cancer cell clonogens has not been definitively shown, recent characterization of molecular signaling pathways controlling stem cells and their microenvironmental niche combined with the earlier findings on clonogen physiology may now lead to the development of molecularly targeted strategies to overcome therapeutic resistance of this rare subpopulation of tumor cells. Along these lines, we describe 3 unique treatment settings (ie, before, during, and after definitive radio[chemo]therapy) in which molecularly targeted approaches might specifically counteract cancer stemlike cell resistance mechanisms and enhance the curative efficiency of radio(chemo)therapy.

Radiobiological basis and clinical results of the simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) in intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for head and neck cancer: A review

The simultaneous integrated boost (SIB)-IMRT technique allows the simultaneous delivery of different dose levels to different target volumes within a single treatment fraction. The most significant aspect associated with SIB-IMRT is related to the fractionation strategy, concerning two time-dose parameters: (1) the shortening of the overall treatment time (OTT); (2) the increase of fraction size (FS) to the boost volume. The SIB-IMRT technique represents, therefore, a new way to investigate the accelerated fractionation in definitive treatment of head and neck (H&N) cancers. The aims of this paper are the following: (1) to briefly review the influence of OTT and FS on H&N tumors and on acutely and late responding normal tissues; (2) to review the results of clinical studies of accelerated radiotherapy not employing IMRT in H&N cancer; (3) to review the clinical experiences of the SIB-IMRT technique and to compare the different SIB regimes in terms of radiobiological efficacy.

Concomitant boost radiotherapy compared with conventional radiotherapy in squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck--a phase III trial from a single institution in India

AIMS

To test the efficacy of an accelerated fractionation schedule (concomitant boost) against standard conventional fractionation in squamous cell carcinomas of the head and neck region in our patient population.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients were randomised to receive either conventional radiotherapy with 2 Gy/fraction/day, to a dose of 66 Gy in 33 fractions over 6.5 weeks or accelerated radiotherapy in the form of concomitant boost to a dose of 67.5 Gy/40 fractions over 5 weeks (phase 1: 45 Gy/25 fractions/5 weeks and phase 2: 22.5 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks as a second daily fraction after a 6h gap). The primary and secondary end points were disease-free survival and locoregional control respectively.

RESULTS

The compliance was 97.2% and 96.5% in the concomitant boost and conventional arms, respectively. Patients treated with concomitant boost had a better 2-year disease-free survival (71.7% vs 52.17%, P=0.0007) and locoregional control rates (73.6% vs 54.5%, P=0.0006) than with conventional fractionation. On exploratory subgroup analysis, the oropharynx (P<0.001), T4 lesions (P=0.017), N+ disease (P<0.001) and stage IV disease (P<0.001) were statistically significant prognostic variables in favour of the concomitant boost arm. Grade 3 mucositis was seen in 35% of patients in the concomitant boost arm, whereas in the conventional arm only 19% of patients had grade 3 mucositis (P=0.01). The median radiotherapy duration in the concomitant boost arm was 36 days (range 36-53 days), whereas in the conventional arm it was 46 days (range 46-64 days). The mean gap in radiation treatment in the concomitant boost arm was 1.68 days (range 0-14 days), whereas the mean gap in the conventional arm was 1.58 days (range 0-14 days).

CONCLUSIONS

Concomitant boost is a therapeutically superior and logistically feasible accelerated radiotherapy regimen in advanced head and neck cancers, especially in the setting of a developing country.

A heterogeneous dose distribution in simultaneous integrated boost: the role of the clonogenic cell density on the tumor control probability

IMRT with inverse planning allows simultaneous integrated boost strategies that exploit the heterogeneous dose distribution within the planning target volumes (PTVs). In this scenario, the location of cold spots within the target becomes a crucial issue and has to be related to the distribution of the clonogenic cell density (CCD). The main aim of this work is to provide the means to calculate the optimal prescription dose in a relative inhomogeneous dose distribution. To achieve this, the prescription dose has to be assigned to obtain the same tumor control probability (TCP) as the ideal homogeneous distribution, taking into account different CCDs in different PTVs (i.e. visible and subclinical regions). An adapted formulation of the linear-quadratic model, within the F-factor formalism, has been derived to preserve a chosen TCP value for the whole target volume. The F-factor has been investigated to show its potential applications in clinical practice.

concomitant chemoradiotherapy with mitomycin C and cisplatin in advanced unresectable carcinoma of the head and neck: phase I-II clinical study

PURPOSE

To evaluate the toxicity and efficacy of concomitant chemoradiotherapy with mitomycin C and cisplatin in the treatment of advanced unresectable squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Treatment consisted of conventional radiotherapy (70 Gy in 35 fractions), mitomycin C 15 mg/m(2) IV, applied after the delivery of 10 Gy, and cisplatin at an initial dose of 10 mg/m(2)/d IV, applied during the last 10 fractions of irradiation ("chemoboost"). The cisplatin dose was escalated with respect to the toxic side effects by 2 mg/m(2)/d up to the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) or at the most 14 mg/m(2)/d (Phase I study), which was tested in the subsequent Phase II study.

RESULTS

All 36 patients had Stage T4 and/or N3 disease, and the majority had oropharyngeal (50%) or hypopharyngeal (39%) primary tumors. Six patients were treated at each of the three cisplatin dose levels tested (Phase I study). Dose-limiting toxicity was not reached even at 14 mg/m(2)/d of cisplatin, which was determined as the MTD and tested in an additional 18 patients (Phase II study). After a median follow-up time of 48 months, 4-year locoregional control, failure-free, and overall survival rates were 30%, 14%, and 20%, respectively. In 24 patients treated at the cisplatin dose level of 14 mg/m(2)/d, the corresponding rates were 40%, 20%, and 22%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Concomitant chemoradiotherapy with mitomycin C and cisplatin "chemoboost" at 14 mg/m(2)/d is feasible, with encouraging survival results if the extremely poor disease profile of the treated patients is considered.

Risk, outcomes, and costs of radiation-induced oral mucositis among patients with head-and-neck malignancies

PURPOSE

To study the risk, outcomes, and costs of radiation-induced oral mucositis (OM) among patients receiving radiotherapy (RT) to head and neck primary cancers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A retrospective cohort consisting of 204 consecutive head-and-neck cancer patients who received RT with or without chemotherapy during 2002 was formed; their records were reviewed for clinical and resource use information. Patients who had received prior therapy, had second primary cancers, or received palliative radiation therapy were excluded. The risk of OM was analyzed by multiple variable logistic regression. The cost of care was computed from the provider's perspective in 2006 U.S. dollars and compared among patients with and without OM.

RESULTS

Oral mucositis occurred in 91% of patients; in 66% it was severe (Grade 3-4). Oral mucositis was more common among patients with oral cavity or oropharynx primaries (odds ratio [OR], 44.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 5.2 to >100; p < 0.001), those who received chemotherapy (OR = 7.8; 95% CI, 1.5-41.6; p = 0.02), and those who were treated with altered fractionation schedules (OR = 6.3; 95% CI, 1.1-35.1; p = 0.03). Patients with OM were significantly more likely to have severe pain (54% vs. 6%; p < 0.001) and a weight loss of > or =5% (60% vs. 17%; p < 0.001). Oral mucositis was associated with an incremental cost of $1700-$6000, depending on the grade.

CONCLUSIONS

Head-and-neck RT causes OM in virtually all patients. Oral mucositis is associated with severe pain, significant weight loss, increased resource use, and excess cost. Preventive strategies are needed.

Disease-control rates following intensity-modulated radiation therapy for small primary oropharyngeal carcinoma

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this study was to assess the ability of intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) to achieve favorable disease-control rates while minimizing parotid gland doses in patients treated for small primary tumors of the oropharynx.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We retrospectively identified all patients who received IMRT as treatment for a small (<4 cm) primary tumor of the oropharynx between October 2000 and June 2002. Tumor characteristics, IMRT parameters, and patient outcomes were assessed.

RESULTS

Fifty-one patients met the criteria for our study. All patients had treatment to gross disease with margin (CTV1), and all but 1 had treatment to the bilateral necks. The most common treatment schedule (39 patients) was a once-daily fractionation of prescribed doses of 63-66 Gy to the CTV1 and 54 Gy to subclinical sites, delivered in 30 fractions. Twenty-one patients (40%) had gastrostomy tubes placed during therapy; in 4 patients, the tube remained in place for more than 6 months after completion of IMRT. The median follow-up was 45 months. The 2-year actuarial locoregional control, recurrence-free, and overall survival rates were 94%, 88%, and 94%, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

These preliminary data suggest that treatment with IMRT results in favorable locoregional control of small primary oropharynx tumors. IMRT did not appear to have a more favorable acute toxicity profile in this group with respect to the use of a feeding tube; however, the mean dose of radiation delivered to the parotid gland by IMRT was decreased, because 95% of patients had a mean dose of <30 Gy to at least one gland.

Recent Advances in Radiation Therapy for Head and Neck Cancer

The treatment of locally advanced or recurrent head and neck cancers has improved from single modality interventions of surgery and radiation therapy alone to include combined modality therapy with surgery, chemotherapy and radiation. Combined therapy has led to improved local control and disease-free survival. New developments in radiation oncology such as altered fractionation, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, intensity-modulated radiotherapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, charged-particle radiotherapy, neutron-beam radiotherapy, and brachytherapy have helped to improve this outlook even further. These recent advances allow for a higher dose to be delivered to the tumor while minimizing the dose delivered to the surrounding normal tissue. This article provides an update of the new developments in radiotherapy in the management of head and neck cancers.

Is there a “mucosa-sparing” benefit of IMRT for head-and-neck cancer?

PURPOSE

To investigate whether intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) allows more mucosal sparing than standard three-field technique (3FT) radiotherapy for early oropharyngeal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Whole-field IMRT plans were generated for 5 patients with early-stage oropharyngeal cancer according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group 0022 (66 Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks) guidelines with and without a dose objective on the portion of mucosa not overlapping any PTV. 3FT plans were also generated for the same 5 patients with two fractionation schedules: conventional fractionation (CF) to 70 Gy/35 fractions/7 weeks and concomitant boost (CB) to 72 Gy/40 fractions/6 weeks. Cumulative dose volume histograms (DVHs) of the overall mucosal volume (as per in-house definition) from all trials were compared after transformation into the linear quadratic equivalent dose at 2 Gy per fraction with a time factor correction.

RESULTS

Compared with IMRT without dose objective on the mucosa, a 30-Gy maximum dose objective on the mucosa allows approximately 20% and approximately 12% mean absolute reduction in the percentage of mucosa volume exposed to a dose equivalent to 30 Gy (p < 0.01) and 70 Gy (p < 0.01) at 2 Gy in 3 and 7 weeks, respectively, without detrimental effect on the coverage of other regions of interest. Without mucosal dose objective, IMRT is associated with a larger amount of mucosa exposed to clinically relevant doses compared with both concomitant boost and conventional fractionation; however, if a dose objective is placed, the reverse is true, with up to approximately 30% reduction in the volume of the mucosa in the high-dose region compared with both concomitant boost and conventional fractionation (p < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy can be potentially provide more mucosal sparing than traditional approaches.

Concurrent end-phase boost high-dose radiation therapy for non-small-cell lung cancer with or without cisplatin chemotherapy

The aim of this study was to audit the results of a high-dose, combined-modality prospective protocol for non-small-cell lung cancer in terms of survival, disease-specific survival and toxicity. One hundred and twenty-one patients with non-small-cell lung cancer were treated with a concurrent, end-phase, boost, high-dose radiotherapy protocol with 65 Gy in 35 fractions for more than 5 weeks. Sixty-six patients received radiotherapy alone (group 1), 29 received concurrent chemoradiation (group 2) and 26 received neoadjuvant and concurrent chemotherapy (group 3). Thirty-four patients had stage I disease, six had stage II and 81 had stage III. Overall median survival was 23 months: 75% at 1 year and 23% at 5 years. Median survivals for patients with stage I and stages II and III disease were 43 and 19 months, respectively. For stages II and III patients by groups 1-3, median survivals were 18, 25 and 18 months, respectively, and 2-year survivals were 36, 52 and 38%, respectively. Toxicity was acceptable. Overall, 9% had symptomatic pneumonitis and 7% had grades 3 and 4 oesophagitis. For those who had the mediastinum included in the volume, grade > or = 3 oesophagitis occurred in 0, 11 and 22% (n = 110, P = 0.001), respectively, for treatment groups 1-3. Overall treatment-related mortality was 3%, consisting of two septic deaths, one pneumonitis and possibly one late cardiac event, all occurring in patients who had chemotherapy (7% of 55 patients). Treatment-related mortality declined over the study period. Accelerated radiotherapy was well tolerated, with only moderate increased acute toxicity when combined with concurrent platinum chemotherapy. Toxicity was enhanced by induction chemotherapy. Overall survival outcomes were excellent for this condition. Continued use of this radiotherapy schedule is recommended as the platform for assessment of other chemotherapy schedules.

Concurrent weekly docetaxel and concomitant boost radiation therapy in the treatment of locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck

PURPOSE

In a Phase I/II trial, we investigated concurrent weekly docetaxel and concomitant boost radiation in patients with locally advanced squamous cell cancer of the head and neck (SCCHN) after induction chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients presented with American Joint Committee on Cancer Stage III/IV and were treated initially with induction chemotherapy using cisplatinum/5-fluorouracil (PF), carboplatinum-5-FU, or docetaxel-PF. Patients then received docetaxel four times weekly with concomitant boost (CB) radiation (1.8 Gy once-daily X20, 1.8/1.5 Gy twice a day). Fifteen patients each received 20 mg/M2 and 25 mg/M2.

RESULTS

Thirty-one patients were enrolled and 30 were evaluable for response and toxicity. Median follow-up was 42 months (range, 27-63 months). Primary sites were: oropharynx 19, oral cavity 2, larynx/hypopharynx 5, and unknown primary 4. Eighty-seven percent of patients had N2/N3 disease; 60% had T3/T4 disease. Twenty percent of patients had a complete response (CR) to induction chemotherapy. After chemoradiotherapy, 21 of 30 patients had a CR, 2 had progressive disease, and 7 had partial response (PR). Nineteen of 26 patients presenting with neck disease had neck dissections, and 7 of 19 were positive. Ninety-three percent of all patients were rendered disease-free after all planned therapy. Treatment failed in 8 patients, and 7 have died of disease. An additional patient died with no evidence of disease. Twenty-one patients (70%) are currently alive with no evidence of disease. No acute dose-limiting toxicity was observed at either dose level.

CONCLUSIONS

This intensive treatment regimen of concurrent docetaxel/concomitant boost radiation and surgery after induction chemotherapy in poor prognosis patients yields good local regional control and survival. Docetaxel/CB chemoradiotherapy represents an aggressive alternative regimen to platinum-based chemoradiotherapy or surgery in patients who have a poor response to induction chemotherapy.

Radiotherapy for head and neck cancer: latest developments and future perspectives

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Despite recent advances in multimodality management the prognosis of patients with stage III-IV squamous cell head and neck cancer remains disappointing. The objective of this review is to identify how, within the main axes of the current translational and clinical research and in an attempt to improve treatment outcome, a number of institutions and cooperative groups have embarked on systematic investigations of novel strategies for radiotherapy delivery and for combining radiation with systemic treatments.

RECENT FINDINGS

Four domains of translational and clinical researches can be identified in head and neck radio-oncology: altered fractionation, concurrent delivery of chemotherapy and radiotherapy, combination of targeted therapies with radiation, and high-conformality radiotherapy.

SUMMARY

Here we provide a critical appraisal of recent strategies allowing an increase in dose intensity for treatments based on radiotherapy and drug-radiation interactions, and revisit the potential opportunities they offer as well as the possible caveats they may present in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancers.

Late chemo-intensification with cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil as an adjunct to radiotherapy: A pragmatic approach for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

The aim of this study was to define the feasibility of a late chemo-intensification treatment regimen with conventionally fractionated radiotherapy (70 Gy/7 weeks). Seventy four patients with Stage III and IV biopsy proven squamous cell carcinoma of oropharynx, hypopharynx and larynx were treated with this regimen. Chemotherapy consisted of continuous infusion of 5-FU at 350 mg/m(2)/day and cisplatin as 1h infusion at 10 mg/m(2)/day on days 1-5 of week 6 and 7 of radiotherapy. Grade III mucositis was present in 48 (64.9%) patients. After surgical salvage 59 (79.7%) patients had overall complete response. Locoregional control rate at 3 year was 80.8%. Three year locoregional relapse free survival (LRFS), overall survival (OS) and disease free survival (DFS) was 63.1%, 66.7% and 44.4%, respectively. The late chemo-intensification regimen was feasible in terms of response rate, toxicity and survival functions.

Concurrent cetuximab, cisplatin, and concomitant boost radiotherapy for locoregionally advanced, squamous cell head and neck cancer: a pilot phase II study of a new combined-modality paradigm

PURPOSE

Cetuximab is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets the epidermal growth factor receptor. Cetuximab has activity in squamous cell carcinoma and enhances both chemotherapy and radiotherapy. We conducted a pilot phase II study of a new combined-modality paradigm of targeted therapy (cetuximab) with chemoradiotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had stage III or IV, M0, squamous cell head and neck cancer. Treatment included concomitant boost radiotherapy (1.8 Gy/d weeks 1 to 6; boost: 1.6 Gy 4 to 6 hours later weeks 5 to 6; 70 Gy total to gross disease), cisplatin (100 mg/m2 intravenously weeks 1 and 4), and cetuximab (400 mg/m2 intravenously week 1, followed by 250 mg/m2 weeks 2 to 10).

RESULTS

Twenty-two patients were enrolled (median age, 57 years; range, 41 to 72 years; median Karnofsky status, 90%; range, 70% to 90%; oropharynx primary tumor, 59% of patients; T4, 36%; N2/3, 77%; stage IV disease, 86%). One patient did not receive study treatment because of an ineligible diagnosis. The severity of expected, acute toxicities was typical of concurrent cisplatin and radiotherapy alone. Grade 3 or 4 cetuximab-related toxicities included acne-like rash (10%) and hypersensitivity (5%). However, the study was closed for significant adverse events, including two deaths (one pneumonia and one unknown cause), one myocardial infarction, one bacteremia, and one atrial fibrillation. With a median follow-up of 52 months, the 3-year overall survival rate is 76%, the 3-year progression-free survival rate is 56%, and the 3-year locoregional control rate is 71%.

CONCLUSION

This regimen is not currently recommended outside of the clinical trial setting. Further investigation of its safety profile is needed. However, preliminary efficacy is encouraging, and further development of this targeted combined-modality paradigm is warranted.

Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) for nasopharynx cancer: Update of the Memorial Sloan-Kettering experience

PURPOSE

We previously demonstrated that intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) significantly improves radiation dose distribution over three-dimensional planning for nasopharynx cancer and reported positive early clinical results. We now evaluate whether IMRT has resulted in improved outcomes for a larger cohort of patients with longer follow-up.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Since 1998, all 74 patients with newly diagnosed, nonmetastatic nasopharynx cancer were treated with IMRT using accelerated fractionation to 70 Gy; 59 received a hyperfractionated concomitant boost, and more recently 15 received once-daily treatment with dose painting. With the exception of Stage I disease (n = 5) and patient preference (n = 1), 69 patients received concurrent and adjuvant platinum-based chemotherapy similar to that in the Intergroup 0099 trial.

RESULTS

PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS

median age 45; 32% Asian; 72% male; 65% World Health Organization III; 6% Stage I, 16% Stage II, 30% Stage III, 47% Stage IV. Median follow-up is 35 months. The 3-year actuarial rate of local control is 91%, and regional control is 93%; freedom from distant metastases, progression-free survival, and overall survival at 3 years are 78%, 67%, and 83%, respectively. There was 100% local control for Stage T1/T2 disease, compared to 83% for T3/T4 disease (p = 0.01). Six patients failed at the primary site, with median time to local tumor progression 16 months; 5 were exclusively within the 70 Gy volume, and 1 was both within and outside the target volume. There is a trend for improved local control with IMRT when compared to local control of 79% for 35 patients treated before 1998 with three-dimensional planning and chemotherapy (p = 0.11). Six months posttherapy, 21%, 13%, 15%, and 0% of patients with follow-up audiograms (n = 24 patients) had Grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 sensorineural hearing loss, respectively. For patients with >1 year follow-up (n = 59), rates of long-term xerostomia were as follows: 26% none, 42% Grade 1, 32% Grade 2, and zero Grade 3.

CONCLUSIONS

The pattern of primary site failure within the target volume suggests locally advanced T stage disease may require a higher biologic dose to gross tumor. Rates of severe (Grade 3-4) ototoxicity and xerostomia are low with IMRT as a result of normal-tissue protection. Distant metastases are now the dominant form of failure, emphasizing the need for improved systemic therapy.

Preliminary results of radiation dose escalation for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To study the safety and efficacy of dose escalation in tumor for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From September 2000 to June 2004, 50 patients with T3-T4 NPC were treated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT). Fourteen patients had Stage III and 36 patients had Stage IVA-IVB disease. The prescribed dose was 76 Gy to gross tumor volume (GTV), 70 Gy to planning target volume (PTV), and 72 Gy to enlarged neck nodes (GTVn). All doses were given in 35 fractions over 7 weeks. Thirty-four patients also had concurrent cisplatin and induction or adjuvant PF (cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil).

RESULTS

The average mean dose achieved in GTV, GTVn, and PTV were 79.5 Gy, 75.3 Gy, and 74.6 Gy, respectively. The median follow-up was 25 months, with 4 recurrences: 2 locoregional and 2 distant failures. All patients with recurrence had IMRT alone without chemotherapy. The 2-year locoregional control rate, distant metastases-free and disease-free survivals were 95.7%, 94.2%, and 93.1%, respectively. One treatment-related death caused by adjuvant chemotherapy occurred. The 2-year overall survival was 92.1%.

CONCLUSIONS

Dose escalation to 76 Gy in tumor is feasible with T3-T4 NPC and can be combined with chemotherapy. Initial results showed good local control and survival.

Concomitant boost radiotherapy with concurrent weekly cisplatin in advanced head and neck cancers: a phase II trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To determine the safety and efficacy of concomitant boost radiotherapy (CBRT) with concurrent cisplatin chemotherapy (CT) in advanced head and neck cancers.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between February 2000 and June 2001, 95 previously untreated patients of advanced head and neck cancers were treated with CBRT and concurrent cisplatin CT. CBRT consisted of: phase I--44 Gy/22fx/4.5 weeks, phase IIa--16 Gy/8fx/1.5 weeks and phase IIb--10 Gy/8fx (delivered as a second daily fraction after a gap of 6h along with phase IIa). CT (cisplatin 35 mg/m(2)) was administered weekly usually preceding CBRT by an hour.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 39 months (range 8-50 months). CBRT compliance (70 Gy in 40-44 days) was seen in 66% (63/95). Six cycles of CT was delivered in 73% (69/95). Acute grade III/IV mucosal toxicity was seen in 79% and resulted, on average, in a total weight loss of 7.9 kg from a mean pretreatment weight of 51 kg. Nasogastric tube placements were required in 26% (25/95) for an average duration of 19.3 days. Grade III leucopenia was seen in 2%. Mortality during and within 30 days of treatment was seen in 14% (13/95). Crude incidence of late subcutaneous fibrosis (grade III) was 21% (12/57) and a case of mandibular necrosis and thyroid cartilage necrosis each were seen. Initial loco regional disease clearance was seen in 59% (56/95) and the Kaplan-Meier estimates of 3-year loco-regional control rate and overall survival were 25% (median 7 months, 95% C.I. 3-11) and 27% (median 12 months, 95% C.I. 8-16), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

On present evidence, in the settings of a developing country, CBRT with concurrent cisplatin cannot be recommended as primary therapy in advanced head and neck cancers without formal comparison with other treatment modalities.

New Radiation Therapy Techniques for the Treatment of Head and Neck Cancer

This article reviews the most recent technology used in the treatment of head and neck cancer. It discusses brachytherapy, new ways to mix radionuclides for enhanced radiobiologic effects, and different fractionation schemes that have grown in clinical importance. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy has become a mainstay in head and neck cancer treatment, and the authors discuss several popular and emerging approaches. Patient immobilization and imaging are also discussed.

Accelerated versus conventional fractionated postoperative radiotherapy for advanced head and neck cancer: results of a multicenter Phase III study

PURPOSE

To determine whether, in the postoperative setting, accelerated fractionation (AF) radiotherapy (RT) yields a superior locoregional control rate compared with conventional fractionation (CF) RT in locally advanced squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity, oropharynx, larynx, or hypopharynx.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients from four institutions with one or more high-risk features (pT4, positive resection margins, pN >1, perineural/lymphovascular invasion, extracapsular extension, subglottic extension) after surgery were randomly assigned to either RT with one daily session of 2 Gy up to 60 Gy in 6 weeks or AF. Accelerated fractionation consisted of a "biphasic concomitant boost" schedule, with the boost delivered during the first and last weeks of treatment, to deliver 64 Gy in 5 weeks. Informed consent was obtained. The primary endpoint of the study was locoregional control. Analysis was on an intention-to-treat basis.

RESULTS

From March 1994 to August 2000, 226 patients were randomized. At a median follow-up of 30.6 months (range, 0-110 months), 2-year locoregional control estimates were 80% +/- 4% for CF and 78% +/- 5% for AF (p = 0.52), and 2-year overall survival estimates were 67% +/- 5% for CF and 64% +/- 5% for AF (p = 0.84). The lack of difference in outcome between the two treatment arms was confirmed by multivariate analysis. However, interaction analysis with median values as cut-offs showed a trend for improved locoregional control for those patients who had a delay in starting RT and who were treated with AF compared with those with a similar delay but who were treated with CF (hazard ratio = 0.5, 95% confidence interval 0.2-1.1). Fifty percent of patients treated with AF developed confluent mucositis, compared with only 27% of those treated with CF (p = 0.006). However, mucositis duration was not different between arms. Although preliminary, actuarial Grade 3+ late toxicity estimates at 2 years were 18% +/- 4% and 27% +/- 6% for CF and AF, respectively (p = 0.10).

CONCLUSION

Accelerated fractionation does not seem to be worthwhile for squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck after resection; however, AF might be an option for patients who delay starting RT.

Concomitant boost radiation and concurrent cisplatin for advanced head and neck carcinomas. Preliminary results of a phase II, single-institutional trial

INTRODUCTION

This study aims to asses the effectiveness and toxicity of boost radiotherapy concomitant and concurrent cisplatin for patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer (LAHNC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

There were 30 patients included in a prospective, phase II single-institution trial and of whom, 29 were at AJCC stage IV and 1 at stage III. Treatment consisted of radiotherapy acceleration fractionation with concomitant boost, 72 Gy, and 2 cycles of concomitant cisplatin (20 mg/m2/day continuous infusion; days 1-5 and 29-33). Amifostine, (i.v. 200 mg/m2) was administered to 26 prior to the first fraction of radiotherapy. Endpoints of the study were quality-of-life (QL), overall survival, and local control of disease.

RESULTS

Complete response (CR) was achieved in 23 patients (77%), 2 patients had partial response (PR) (7%), 4 had no response (13%), and 1 was not evaluated for response. The 2-year overall survival and loco-regional control were 60% and 56%, respectively. Main toxicity was grade 3 or 4 mucositis in 93% of the patients. QL scores (questionnaire QLQC30; version 3.0) and the HN cancer module QLQ-HN35) showed a worsening in areas related to the treatment e.g. dry mouth, problems stretching the mouth, and sticky saliva.

CONCLUSIONS

this combination modality is active, but toxic, in the treatment for LAHNC. Concomitant boost radiotherapy is probably, not the best radiotherapy schema for combining with chemotherapy in LAHNC.

Tirapazamine, Cisplatin, and Radiation versus Fluorouracil, Cisplatin, and Radiation in patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer: a randomized phase II trial of the Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group (TROG 98.02)

PURPOSE

To select one of two chemoradiotherapy regimens for locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) of the head and neck as the experimental arm for the next Trans-Tasman Radiation Oncology Group phase III trial.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-two previously untreated patients with stage III/IV SCC of the head and neck were randomized to receive definitive radiotherapy (70 Gy in 7 weeks) concurrently with either cisplatin (75 mg/m(2)) plus tirapazamine (290 mg/m(2)/d) on day 2 of weeks 1, 4, and 7, and tirapazamine alone (160 mg/m(2)/d) on days 1, 3, and 5 of weeks 2 and 3 (TPZ/CIS), or cisplatin (50 mg/m(2)) on day 1 and infusional fluorouracil (360 mg/m(2)/d) on days 1 through 5 of weeks 6 and 7 (chemoboost).

RESULTS

Three-year failure-free survival rates were 55% with TPZ/CIS (95% CI, 39% to 70%) and 44% with chemoboost (95% CI, 30% to 60%; log-rank P = .16). Three-year locoregional failure-free rates were 84% in the TPZ/CIS arm (95% CI, 71% to 92%) and 66% in the chemoboost arm (95% CI, 51% to 79%; P = .069). More febrile neutropenia and grade 3 or 4 late mucous membrane toxicity were observed with TPZ/CIS, while acute skin radiation reaction was more severe and prolonged with chemoboost. Compliance with protocol treatment was satisfactory on both arms.

CONCLUSION

Both regimens are feasible and are associated with significant but acceptable toxicity profiles in the cooperative group setting. Based on the promising efficacy seen in this trial, TPZ/CIS is being evaluated in a large phase III trial.