Charged particle radiotherapy of paraspinal tumors

Protons versus photons for the treatment of chordoma

BACKGROUND

Chordoma is a rare primary bone tumour with a high propensity for local recurrence. Surgical resection is the mainstay of treatment, but complete resection is often morbid due to tumour location. Similarly, the dose of radiotherapy (RT) that surrounding healthy organs can tolerate is frequently below that required to provide effective tumour control. Therefore, clinicians have investigated different radiation delivery techniques, often in combination with surgery, aimed to improve the therapeutic ratio.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effects and toxicity of proton and photon adjuvant radiotherapy (RT) in people with biopsy-confirmed chordoma.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched CENTRAL (2021, Issue 4); MEDLINE Ovid (1946 to April 2021); Embase Ovid (1980 to April 2021) and online registers of clinical trials, and abstracts of scientific meetings up until April 2021.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included adults with pathologically confirmed primary chordoma, who were irradiated with curative intent, with protons or photons in the form of fractionated RT, SRS (stereotactic radiosurgery), SBRT (stereotactic body radiotherapy), or IMRT (intensity modulated radiation therapy). We limited analysis to studies that included outcomes of participants treated with both protons and photons.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcomes were local control, mortality, recurrence, and treatment-related toxicity. We followed current standard Cochrane methodological procedures for data extraction, management, and analysis. We used the ROBINS-I tool to assess risk of bias, and GRADE to assess the certainty of the evidence.

MAIN RESULTS

We included six observational studies with 187 adult participants. We judged all studies to be at high risk of bias. Four studies were included in meta-analysis. We are uncertain if proton compared to photon therapy worsens or has no effect on local control (hazard ratio (HR) 5.34, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66 to 43.43; 2 observational studies, 39 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Median survival time ranged between 45.5 months and 66 months. We are uncertain if proton compared to photon therapy reduces or has no effect on mortality (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.13 to 1.57; 4 observational studies, 65 participants; very low-certainty evidence). Median recurrence-free survival ranged between 3 and 10 years. We are uncertain whether proton compared to photon therapy reduces or has no effect on recurrence (HR 0.34, 95% CI 0.10 to 1.17; 4 observational studies, 94 participants; very low-certainty evidence). One study assessed treatment-related toxicity and reported that four participants on proton therapy developed radiation-induced necrosis in the temporal bone, radiation-induced damage to the brainstem, and chronic mastoiditis; one participant on photon therapy developed hearing loss, worsening of the seventh cranial nerve paresis, and ulcerative keratitis (risk ratio (RR) 1.28, 95% CI 0.17 to 9.86; 1 observational study, 33 participants; very low-certainty evidence). There is no evidence that protons led to reduced toxicity. There is very low-certainty evidence to show an advantage for proton therapy in comparison to photon therapy with respect to local control, mortality, recurrence, and treatment related toxicity.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is a lack of published evidence to confirm a clinical difference in effect with either proton or photon therapy for the treatment of chordoma. As radiation techniques evolve, multi-institutional data should be collected prospectively and published, to help identify persons that would most benefit from the available radiation treatment techniques.

Clinical trials involving carbon-ion radiation therapy and the path forward

To describe the international landscape of clinical trials in carbon-ion radiotherapy (CIRT), the authors reviewed the current status of 63 ongoing clinical trials (median, 47 participants) involving CIRT identified from the US clinicaltrials.gov trial registry and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Platform Registry. The objectives were to evaluate the potential for these trials to define the role of this modality in the treatment of specific cancer types and identify the major challenges and opportunities to advance this technology. A significant body of literature suggested the potential for advantageous dose distributions and, in preclinical biologic studies, the enhanced effectiveness for CIRT compared with photons and protons. In addition, clinical evidence from phase I/II trials, although limited, indicated the potential for CIRT to improve cancer outcomes. However, current high-level phase III randomized clinical trial evidence does not exist. Although there has been an increase in the number of trials investigating CIRT since 2010, and the number of countries and sites offering CIRT is slowly growing, this progress has excluded other countries. Several recommendations are proposed to study this modality to accelerate progress in the field, including: 1) increasing the number of multinational randomized clinical trials, 2) leveraging the existing CIRT facilities to launch larger multinational trials directed at common cancers combined with high-level quality assurance; and 3) developing more compact and less expensive next-generation treatment systems integrated with radiobiologic research and preclinical testing.

Challenges of local recurrence and cure in low grade malignant tumors of the spine

STUDY DESIGN

Systematic review and ambispective multicenter cohort study.

OBJECTIVE

1. To compare the effects of wide/marginal (en bloc) resection with intralesional resection on local recurrence and survival for chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the spine. 2. To determine the influence of radiation therapy in the management of chordomas and chondrosarcomas.

SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA

Chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the spine are prone to local recurrence and death despite being low-grade malignant tumors. No study to date has enough numbers or adequate scientific rigor to determine the influence of resection or radiation therapy on outcome.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed to evaluate the 2 objectives. In addition an ambispective multicenter cohort analysis of chordomas and chondrosarcomas was performed. The GRADE system of analysis integrating the results of the systematic review, the multicenter cohort study and the expert opinion of the Spine Oncology Study Group (SOSG) was used to arrive at treatment recommendations.

RESULTS

A total of 63 articles were included in the systematic reviews. Evidence was low quality. En bloc resection appeared to improve both local recurrence and disease free survival in Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma. Radiation therapy had a positive impact on the management of Chordoma and Chondrosarcoma with predictably low side effects. The cohort analysis showed significantly decreased local recurrence for Chordoma (P < 0.0001) and Chondrosarcoma (P < 0.0001) with en bloc resection, and significantly decreased death for both Chordoma (P = 0.0001) and Chondrosarcoma (P = 0.0015) with en bloc resection.

CONCLUSION

When wide or marginal margins (en bloc) are achieved in surgical resection of chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the spine there is a decrease in local recurrence and mortality. Therefore, en bloc resection should be undertaken for the treatment of chordomas and chondrosarcomas of the spine. Strong Recommendation, Moderate Quality Evidence.Radiation therapy of at least 60 to 65 Gy equivalents is indicated as an adjuvant treatment for chordoma and chondrosarcoma of the spine when there has been incomplete resection or an intralesional margin. Weak Recommendation, Low Quality Evidence.

Radiation techniques in neuro-oncology

Radiation therapy plays a critical role in the management of tumors of the brain. A variety of radiotherapy techniques have been used to treat these tumors. This review describes both classic and more recent and advanced techniques available to manage these tumors. Included is a discussion of standard two- and three-dimensional radiation, as well as intensity-modulated radiotherapy, image-guided radiation therapy, stereotactic radiosurgery, and heavy particles.

STEREOTACTIC RADIOSURGERY FOR THE TREATMENT OF PRIMARY SARCOMAS AND SARCOMA METASTASES OF THE SPINE

OBJECTIVE

Spinal sarcomas pose unique treatment dilemmas because of the difficulty of achieving adequate surgical margins and/or delivering curative radiation doses (65 Gy) in close proximity to the spinal cord. This study used hypofractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) to deliver higher biologically effective doses to treat primary spinal sarcomas and spinal sarcoma metastases.

METHODS

Twenty-four patients with spinal or paraspinal sarcomas entered an Institutional Review Board-approved registry trial to evaluate SRS efficacy. They were assessed at regular intervals for pain control, disease progression, and complications for a minimum of 12 months or until death.

RESULTS

The median treatment dose for the spinal sarcoma lesions was 30 Gy at the 80% isodose in 3 fractions, with some variation based on tumor size, shape, and dose to adjacent critical structures. Seven patients were treated definitively; all had excellent pain relief and are alive with a mean follow-up period of 33 months. Two patients had complete tumor regression, 3 had partial regression, and 2 experienced recurrences and have been re-treated. Seven patients underwent resection and adjuvant SRS. One of 3 patients treated preoperatively had complete tumor regression, and none of the 4 patients treated postoperatively had a local recurrence with a mean follow-up period of 43.5 months. All 10 patients with sarcoma metastases to the spine (16 lesions) died, with a mean survival of 11.1 months from first spinal metastasis treatment. Complete pain relief was achieved in 8 patients, partial relief in 7 patients, and none in 1 patient. No patient developed radiation myelitis.

CONCLUSION

These preliminary results suggest that SRS may have a role in the definitive treatment of patients with primary spinal sarcomas who are deemed unresectable and as adjuvant treatment in those undergoing surgery and for palliation of sarcoma metastases.

Advanced-technology radiation therapy for bone sarcomas

BACKGROUND

Bone sarcomas are rare primary tumors. Radiation therapy (RT) can be useful in securing local control in cases where negative surgical margins cannot be obtained or where tumors are not resected. Recent technical advances in RT offer the opportunity to deliver radiation to these tumors with higher precision, thus allowing higher doses to the tumor target with lower doses to critical normal tissues, which can improve local tumor control and/or reduce treatment-related morbidity.

METHODS

The authors conducted a survey of recent technical developments that have been applied to the RT for bone sarcomas.

RESULTS

RT techniques that show promise include intensity-modulated photon radiation therapy, 3-D conformal proton RT, intensity-modulated proton RT, heavy charged-particle RT, intraoperative RT, and brachytherapy. All of these techniques permit the delivery of higher radiation doses to the target and less dose to normal tissue than had been possible with conventional 3-D conformal radiation techniques. Protons deliver substantially less dose to normal tissues than photons.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from clinical studies using these advanced radiation techniques suggest that they can improve the therapeutic ratio (the ratio of local control efficacy to the risk of complications). This is expected to improve the treatment outcome for these challenging tumors.

Spot Scanning Proton Therapy in the Curative Treatment of Adult Patients With Sarcoma: The Paul Scherrer Institute Experience

PURPOSE

To assess the safety and efficacy of spot scanning proton beam therapy (PT) in the curative treatment of soft-tissue sarcoma (STS) in adults patients.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We identified 13 STS patients treated with PT between July 1998 and May 2005 in our institutional database. Tumor histology varied with the most common histologic subtypes including liposarcoma and peripheral nerve sheet tumor. All tumors were located in vicinity of critical structures, such as the spinal cord, optic apparatus, bowel, kidney, or bowel. Of the patients, 6 and 5 patients received PT either as adjuvant therapy for non-R0 resection or for recurrence, respectively. Two patients received radical PT for unresectable disease. The median prescribed dose was 69.4 CGE (CGE = proton Gy x 1.1)-Gy (range, 50.4-76.0) at 1.8 to 2 CGE-Gy (median, 1.9) per fraction. Pre-PT anthracycline-based chemotherapy was delivered to 3 patients only. No patient has been lost to follow-up (median 48.1 months, range, 19.1-100.7 months).

RESULTS

Of the 13 patients, all but 2 patients were alive. Local recurrence developed in 3 (23%) patients. The administered dose to these patients was < or =60 Gy-CGE. Distant control was achieved in all but 2 patients (lung metastasis), 1 of whom presented with a concomitant local recurrence. The 4-year local control and metastasis-free survival rates were 74.1% and 84.6%, respectively. Late grade > or =2 toxicity was observed in only 2 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Spot scanning PT is an effective and safe treatment for patient with STS in critical locations. The observed toxicity rate was acceptable.

Advanced-technology radiation therapy in the management of bone and soft tissue sarcomas

BACKGROUND

For patients with sarcomas, radiotherapy can be used as neoadjuvant, adjuvant, or primary local therapy, depending on the site and type of sarcoma, the surgical approach, and the efficacy of chemotherapy.

METHODS

The authors review the current status of advanced technology radiation therapy in the management of bone and soft tissue sarcoma.

RESULTS

Advances in radiotherapy have resulted in improved treatment for bone and soft tissue sarcomas. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) uses modifications in the intensity of the photon-beam from a linear accelerator across the irradiated fields to enhance dose conformation in three dimensions. For proton-beam radiation therapy, the nuclei of hydrogen atoms are accelerated in cyclotrons or synchrotrons, extracted, and transported to treatment rooms where the proton beam undergoes a series of modifications that conform the dose in a particular patient to the tumor target. Brachytherapy and intraoperative radiation therapy have generally been used to treat microscopic residual disease in patients with sarcomas. These technologies deliver dose to tumor cells with irradiation of limited volumes of normal tissue. Patients who may benefit from technically advanced radiotherapy include those with skull base and spine/paraspinal sarcomas, Ewing's sarcoma, and retroperitoneal/extremity sarcomas.

CONCLUSIONS

Advances in radiation therapy technology, particularly IMRT, proton-beam or other charged-particle radiation therapy, brachytherapy, and intraoperative radiation therapy, have led to improved treatment for patients with bone and soft tissue sarcomas.

Clinical and research validity of hadrontherapy with ion beams

Clinical results obtained with hadrontherapy have been extremely positive for various tumours, with percentages of local control and survival higher than those ascribed to conventional radiotherapy. Most clinical data obtained with charged particles are related to protontherapy but the implementation of carbon ion therapy has demonstrated to be of great interest in the last decade. These results, accompanied by the new performances in accelerator technology and calculation systems of the delivered doses, have determined over the past years an increased interest for the development of hadrontherapy, with the construction of new centres provided with equipment entirely dedicated to clinical activity (LLUMC, Loma Linda and NPTC, Boston in USA, HIMAC-NIRS, Chiba, PROBEAT, Tsukuba, and Hyogo Beam Medical Centres in Japan). A revision of the clinical indications specifically focused on ion therapy is presented as well as the results obtained in the different centres. With hadrontherapy, it is finally possible to increase the spectrum of treatments allowing preserving the organ and its functionality, with positive impacts from a social and economic point of view.

Late effects from hadron therapy

Successful cancer patient survival and local tumor control from hadron radiotherapy warrant a discussion of potential secondary late effects from the radiation. The study of late-appearing clinical effects from particle beams of protons, carbon, or heavier ions is a relatively new field with few data. However, new clinical information is available from pioneer hadron radiotherapy programs in the USA, Japan, Germany and Switzerland. This paper will review available data on late tissue effects from particle radiation exposures, and discuss its importance to the future of hadron therapy. Potential late radiation effects are associated with irradiated normal tissue volumes at risk that in many cases can be reduced with hadron therapy. However, normal tissues present within hadron treatment volumes can demonstrate enhanced responses compared to conventional modes of therapy. Late endpoints of concern include induction of secondary cancers, cataract, fibrosis, neurodegeneration, vascular damage, and immunological, endocrine and hereditary effects. Low-dose tissue effects at tumor margins need further study, and there is need for more acute molecular studies underlying late effects of hadron therapy.

Significance and implementation of RBE variations in proton beam therapy

Key to radiation therapy is to apply a high tumor-destroying dose while protecting healthy tissue, especially near organs at risk. To optimize treatment for ion therapy not the dose but the dose multiplied by the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) is decisive. Proton therapy has been based on the use of a generic RBE, which is applied to all treatments independent of dose/fraction, position in the spread-out Bragg peak (SOBP), initial beam energy or the particular tissue. Dependencies of the RBE on various physical and biological properties are disregarded. The variability of RBE in clinical situations is believed to be within 10-20%. This is in the same range of effects that receive high attention these days, i.e., patient set-up uncertainties, organ motion effects, and dose calculation accuracy all affecting proton as well as conventional radiation therapy. Elevated RBE values can be expected near the edges of the target, thus probably near critical structures. This is because the edges show lower doses and, depending on the treatment plan, may be identical with the beam's distal edge, where dose is deposited in part by high-LET protons. We assess the rationale for the continued use of a generic RBE and whether the magnitude of RBE variation with treatment parameters is small relative to our abilities to determine RBE's. Two aspects have to be considered. Firstly, the available information from experimental studies and secondly, our ability to calculate RBE values for a given treatment plan based on parameters extracted from such experiments. We analyzed published RBE values for in vitro and in vivo endpoints. The values for cell survival in vitro indicate a substantial spread between the diverse cell lines. The average value at mid SOBP over all dose levels is approximately 1.2 in vitro and approximately 1.1 in vivo. Both in vitro and in vivo data indicate a statistically significant increase in RBE for lower doses per fraction, which is much smaller for in vivo systems. The experimental in vivo data indicate that continued employment of a generic RBE value of 1.1 is reasonable. At present, there seems to be too much uncertainty in the RBE value for any human tissue to propose RBE values specific for tissue, dose/fraction, etc. There is a clear need for prospective assessments of normal tissue reactions in proton irradiated patients and determinations of RBE values for several late responding tissues in animal systems, especially as a function of dose in the range of 1-4 Gy. However, there is a measurable increase in RBE over the terminal few mm of the SOBP, which results in an extension of the bio-effective range of the beam of a few mm. This needs to be considered in treatment planning, particularly for single field plans or for an end of range in or close to a critical structure. To assess our ability to calculate RBE values we studied two approaches, which are both based on the track structure theory of radiation action. RBE calculations are difficult since both the physical input parameters, i.e., LET distributions, and, even more so, the biological input parameters, i.e., local cellular response, have to be known with high accuracy. Track structure theory provides a basis for predicting dose-response curves for particle irradiation. However, designed for heavy ion applications the models show weaknesses in the prediction of proton radiation effects. We conclude that, at present, RBE modeling in treatment planning involves significant uncertainties. To incorporate RBE variations in treatment planning there has to be a reliable biological model to calculate RBE values based on the physical characteristics of the radiation field and based on well-known biological input parameters. In order to do detailed model calculations more experimental data, in particular for in vivo endpoints, are needed

A treatment planning comparison of intensity modulated photon and proton therapy for paraspinal sarcomas

PURPOSE

A comparative treatment planning study has been undertaken between intensity modulated (IM) photon therapy and IM proton therapy (IMPT) in paraspinal sarcomas, so as to assess the potential benefits and limitations of these treatment modalities. In the case of IM proton therapy, plans were compared also for two different sizes of the pencil beam. Finally, a 10% and 20% dose escalation with IM protons was planned, and the consequential organ at risk (OAR) irradiation was evaluated.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Plans for 5 patients were computed for IM photons (7 coplanar fields) and protons (3 coplanar beams), using the KonRad inverse treatment planning system (developed at the German Cancer Research Center). IMPT planning was performed assuming 2 different sizes of the pencil beam: IMPT with a beam of full width at half-maximum of 20 mm, and IMPT with a "mini-beam" (IMPT(M), full width at half-maximum = 12 mm). Prescribed dose was 77.4 Gy or cobalt Gray equivalent (CGE) for protons to the gross tumor volume (GTV). Surface and center spinal cord dose constraint for all techniques was 64 and 53 Gy/CGE, respectively. Tumor and OAR dose-volume histograms were calculated. Results were analyzed using dose-volume histogram parameters, inhomogeneity coefficient, and conformity index.

RESULTS

Gross tumor volume coverage was optimal and equally homogeneous with both IM photon and IM proton plans. Compared to the IM photon plans, the use of IM proton beam therapy leads to a substantial reduction of the OAR total integral dose in the low-level to mid-dose level. Median heart, lung, kidney, stomach, and liver mean dose and dose at the 50% volume level were consistently reduced by a factor of 1.3 to 25. Tumor dose homogeneity in IMPT(M) plans was always better than with IMPT planning (median inhomogeneity coefficient, 0.19 vs. 0.25). IMPT dose escalation (to 92.9 CGE to the GTV) was possible in all patients without exceeding the normal-tissue dose limits.

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that the use of IM photon therapy, when compared to IM protons, can result in similar levels of tumor conformation. IM proton therapy, however, reduces the OAR integral dose substantially, compared to IM photon radiation therapy. As a result, tumor dose escalation was always possible with IM proton planning, within the maximal OAR dose constraints. In IM proton planning, reducing the size of the proton pencil beam (using the "mini-beam") improved the dose homogeneity, but it did not have a significant effect on the dose conformity.

Intraoperative dural irradiation by customized 192iridium and 90yttrium brachytherapy plaques

PURPOSE

After vertebral or paravertebral tumor resection, tumor cells may remain on the dura. Because a tumoricidal dose is difficult to achieve using external beam radiotherapy without exceeding the spinal cord tolerance, we developed intraoperative applicators to deliver additional dose to the dura.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eight patients with vertebral or paravertebral tumor underwent conformal external beam radiotherapy, tumor resection, and intraoperative radiotherapy to the dura involved by tumor. At surgery, vertebra, soft tissue, and epidural tumor were resected. A radioactive applicator plaque was placed on the dura to deliver 7.5-15 Gy, and then removed. Vertebral reconstruction and stabilization was completed. Chemotherapy was administered for large, high-grade sarcomas.

RESULTS

We progressed through three plaque designs, initially (192)Ir, subsequently liquid (90)Y, and finally (90)Y foil in a semicylindrical polycarbonate plaque, in the treatment of 8 patients. The low-energy (90)Y beta-emissions provided a more attractive depth dose profile than that achievable with iridium and gave negligible staff radiation exposure. The (90)Y depth dose measured 29% at 2 mm and 9% at 4 mm from the surface of the foil plaque, with acceptable surface dose homogeneity. The average surface dose rate ranged from 18.7 to 47.6 cGy/min for the iridium plaques and 45.2 to 187.5 cGy/min for the (90)Y plaques. The treatments have been without acute or late neurologic complications. The disease of 6 of 8 patients was locally controlled at median potential follow-up of 24 months.

CONCLUSIONS

The (90)Y foil applicator is technically elegant, easy to use, and superior to the earlier models. It has been incorporated into a protocol for spinal tumor treatment.

Proton beam therapy in the management of central nervous system tumors in childhood: the preliminary experience of the Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to evaluate clinical results and complications of a combination of proton and photon irradiation administered to 17 children with selected central nervous system (CNS) tumors.

PROCEDURE

Between July 1994 and September 2000, 17 children, aged from 5 to 17 years (median: 12 years) with intracranial benign (6 cases) or malignant (11 cases) tumors, were treated with photons (median dose: 40 Gy; 24-54) and protons (median dose: 20 CGE; 9-31) at the Centre de Protonthérapie d'Orsay (CPO).

RESULTS

Mean follow-up was 27 months (3-81). Two patients recurred locally (one marginal and one in situ). Fifteen patients are alive and doing well. Overall, 12, 24, and 36-month local control rate was 92 +/- 8% and, 12, 24, and 36-month overall survival rates were 93 +/- 6%, 83 +/- 11%, and 83 +/- 11%, respectively. Clinical initial symptoms remained stable or subsided in all patients. Early toxicities were in the expected range.

CONCLUSIONS

With a mean 27 months follow-up, protontherapy was well tolerated for doses upto 69 CGE and with an excellent local control rate.

Comparative treatment planning between proton and X-ray therapy in pancreatic cancer

With the utilization of new biologic agents and experimental chemotherapy in the treatment of pancreatic cancer, the issue of local-regional control will become increasingly important. This study was undertaken to determine the feasibility of dose escalation using proton therapy, as compared to conventional 3-dimensional conformal radiation, by minimizing the dose to normal tissues. The photon treatment plans of 4 patients with unresectable pancreatic cancer treated on a biologic therapy trial were utilized. Each patient was treated using a 3- or 4-field photon plan with 45 Gy to the clinical target volume (CTV), followed by a boost of 14.4 Gy to the gross target volume (GTV). Using a Helax treatment planning system, proton plans were generated to encompass the same CTV and GTV to the same prescribed dose. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were generated for the GTV, CTV, spinal cord, liver, and right and left kidneys. Each DVH was compared between the photon and proton plans. Proton plans utilized either a 2- or 3-field technique. Available energies included 130 or 180 MeV. Range modulators and bolus were used as needed to conform to the target volume. With the CTV and GTV receiving the same dose from the proton and photon plans, all individual proton plans were superior to the photon plans in reduction of normal tissue dose. For the 4 patients, the average dose reduction to 50% of the organ at risk was 78% to spinal cord (p = 0.003), 73% to left kidney (p = 0.025), 43% to right kidney (p = 0.059), and 55% to liver (p = 0.061). These comparative treatment plans show proton therapy results in significant reductions of dose to normal tissue compared to conventional photons while treating the same target volumes. This allows for the design of dose-escalation protocols using protons in combination with new biologic therapies and chemotherapy.

Technical advances in radiotherapy of head and neck tumors

Future teletherapy in head and neck sites will include treatment of additional aggressive base-of-skull tumors, acoustic neuromas, and external ear canal tumors. In addition, protocols are being developed to take advantage of the enhanced precision of stereotaxic and conformal teletherapy to deliver concomitant boosts to gross or residual disease after surgery. These field-in-field boosts permit accelerated, hyperfractionated radiotherapy to be delivered to tumor, while maintaing or decreasing dose to surrounding normal tissues. The improved results of aggressive, accelerated fractionation schedules may be realized with acceptable morbidities through the use of more focused irradiation.

Particle beam therapy (hadrontherapy): basis for interest and clinical experience

The particle or hadron beams deployed in radiotherapy (protons, neutrons and helium, carbon, oxygen and neon ions) have physical and radiobiological characteristics which differ from those of conventional radiotherapy beams (photons) and which offer a number of theoretical advantages over conventional radiotherapy. After briefly describing the properties of hadron beams in comparison to photons, this review discusses the indications for hadrontherapy and analyses accumulated experience on the use of this modality to treat mainly neoplastic lesions, as published by the relatively few hadrontherapy centres operating around the world. The analysis indicates that for selected patients and tumours (particularly uveal melanomas and base of skull/spinal chordomas and chondrosarcomas), hadrontherapy produces greater disease-free survival. The advantages of hadrontherapy are most promisingly realised when used in conjunction with modern patient positioning, radiation delivery and focusing techniques (e.g. on-line imaging, three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy) developed to improve the efficacy of photon therapy. Although the construction and running costs of hadrontherapy units are considerably greater than those of conventional facilities, a comprehensive analysis that considers all the costs, particularly those resulting from the failure of less effective conventional radiotherapy, might indicate that hadrontherapy could be cost effective. In conclusion, the growing interest in this form of treatment seems to be fully justified by the results obtained to date, although more efficacy and dosing studies are required.

Chondrosarcoma of the larynx: the role of radiotherapy revisited--a case report and review of the literature

BACKGROUND

Experience in the treatment of laryngeal chondrosarcoma is based on about 250 cases reported to date. The standard therapy is conservative surgery. Radiotherapy has universally been regarded as ineffective in the treatment of this disease.

METHODS

A patient with a laryngeal chondrosarcoma was observed for 11 years after radical radiotherapy. The literature on laryngeal chondrosarcoma was critically reviewed, with emphasis placed on radiotherapy.

RESULTS

The review of the literature revealed that experience with radiotherapy of laryngeal chondrosarcoma has been lacking, with fewer than 10 cases with short follow-up documented up to now. Meanwhile, increasing evidence of the efficacy of radiotherapy in the treatment of skeletal chondrosarcoma has emerged. The authors report the first case of chondrosarcoma of the larynx in which radical radiotherapy resulted in a long term remission of more than 10 years.

CONCLUSIONS

Radiotherapy should be considered when radical surgery is not feasible without severe mutilation. It should also be considered for the treatment of residual disease. Laryngectomy should be restricted to salvage treatment when radiotherapy fails. In this study, radiotherapy appeared to be an effective modality in the treatment of low grade laryngeal chondrosarcoma, and these results contrast with the current widespread disapproval of this treatment.

Comparative treatment planning between proton and X-ray therapy in locally advanced rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Conformal treatment planning with megavoltage X-rays and protons for medically inoperable patients with a large rectal cancer has been studied in an attempt to determine if there are advantages of using protons instead of X-rays.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Three dose plans were made for each of the six patients: one proton plan, including three beams covering the primary tumour and adjacent lymph nodes and three boost beams covering the primary tumour: one X-ray plan, eight beams including a boost with four beams and one mixed plan with four X-ray beams and a boost with three proton beams. A three dimensional treatment-planning systems, TMS, was used. The evaluation of the different plans was made by applying the biological models TCP and NTCP on the dose distributions in terms of dose-volume histograms.

RESULTS

The comparison shows advantages of using protons instead of X-rays for all six patients, but in three of them, the advantage is only marginal. The dose-limiting organ at risk is the small bowel, but the proton plan and the mixed plan also spare the bladder and the femoral heads better. At 5% NTCP in any risk organ, the calculated mean TCP value for the six patients is increased by 14%-units with the proton plan and 8%-units with the mixed plan compared to X-rays only.

CONCLUSIONS

Proton beam therapy has potential advantages when treating medically inoperable patients with a large rectal cancer over conventional X-ray therapy. Since the benefits are comparatively small, although clinically worthwhile, large randomised studies are needed.

Spinal chordomas--results of treatment over a 17-year period

Among a series of 511 spinal tumours treated in the Department of Neurosurgery at the Nordstadt Hospital in Hannover, Germany, between September 1977 and August 1994, 23 operations for spinal chordomas in 9 patients (3 females, 6 males) were performed. After an average period of 7 +/- 12 months (2 weeks to 5 years) patients presented at an average age of 45 +/- 17 years with pain (68%), gait ataxia (14%), motor weakness (9%) or sphincter disturbances (9%). A complete resection was achieved in 11 operations and a subtotal tumour removal in 12 instances. After subtotal removal, 5 tumours were treated postoperatively using local high dose radiotherapy (60-70 Gy). Overall, every chordoma recurred with the passage of time unless en-bloc resection of the tumour had been performed. The recurrence-free interval tended to be longer after radiotherapy. Analysis of postoperative results revealed a significant positive effect of radiotherapy for motor function, pain, Karnofsky score, and survival. In conclusion, en-bloc resection should be performed whenever localization and extension of the tumour allow one to do so. Surgery should be followed by local high dose radiotherapy.

Results of heavy ion radiotherapy

The potential of heavy ion therapy for clinical use in cancer therapy stems from the biological parameters of heavy charged particles and their precise dose localization. Biologically, carbon, neon, and other heavy ion beams (up to about silicon) are clinically useful in overcoming the radioresistance of hypoxic tumors, thus increasing the biological effectiveness relative to low linear energy transfer x-ray or electron beams. Cells irradiated by heavy ions show less variation in cell-cycle-related radiosensitivity and decreased repair of radiation injury. The physical parameters of these heavy charged particles allow precise delivery of high doses to tumors while minimizing irradiation of normal tissues. Clinical use requires a close interaction between radiation oncologists, medical physicists, accelerator physicists, engineers, computer scientists, and radiation biologists.

Treatment planning with heavy ions

The use of heavy charged particles in radiotherapy potentially represents an advance towards better local tumour control and a decrease in morbidity related to radiation injury of healthy tissues surrounding the target volume. This assertion only holds, however, if treatment planning systems give a real representation of the three-dimensional dose distribution, including physical and biological aspects, especially for heavier ions. The influence of linear energy transfer on the biological effects, its variations related to depth, particle, target tissue, position in the Bragg peak, etc. make the possible models for treatment planning extremely complex. A brief review of the problems to be addressed and some solutions is presented from the radiation oncologist's point of view.

Proton radiobiology, radiosurgery and radiotherapy

This review briefly traces the historical developments of proton radiobiology, radiosurgery and radiotherapy for the benefit of young researchers and clinicians entering into this field. In preparing to use protons in radiosurgery and radiotherapy, radiobiological effects of protons were studied extensively by various groups, including the University of California at Berkeley, the University of Uppsala, Massachusetts General Hospital, and the Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory. Considerable work on proton radiobiology was also done because protons are a major component of the radiation environment in space. The biological effects of proton beams were found to be quantitatively and qualitatively similar to conventional radiations used in radiotherapy. The relative biological effectiveness (RBE) of protons suitable for large-field radiotherapy, compared with 60Co gamma-rays, is generally in the range 1.0-1.25, and remains the same with depth of penetration, except for the descending portion of the depth-dose curve. Also, unlike other heavier charged particles and neutrons, the RBE of high-energy protons, which are suitable for large-field radiotherapy, compared with 60Co gamma-rays, is generally found to be independent of the fraction size in in vivo experiments. The oxygen enhancement ratio for high-energy protons is not significantly different from that of X-rays. An RBE = 1.1, compared with 60Co gamma-rays, is generally used in the clinical application of protons; however, the radiobiological data on mouse, rat, rabbit and primate suggest that the gastrointestinal tissues may be relatively more sensitive to protons. About 13,000 patients have been treated with protons at about 15 facilities around the world. Nearly half of these patients were neurosurgical patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery. The pioneering efforts at the Harvard Cyclotron in collaboration with the Massachusetts General Hospital and the Massachusetts Eye and Ear Infirmary were responsible for the development of proton treatment for choroidal melanoma and for the tumours of the skull base and spine. There has been extensive confirmation of these results by other groups, especially the groups at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory and Paul Scherrer Institute. The first medically dedicated proton facility is in operation at Loma Linda University in California. The construction in the USA of another proton treatment facility at Massachusetts General Hospital has been decided upon, and there are plans for many more worldwide.

Locally challenging osteo- and chondrogenic tumors of the axial skeleton: results of combined proton and photon radiation therapy using three-dimensional treatment planning

PURPOSE

Tumors of the axial skeleton are at high risk for local failure. Total surgical resection is rarely possible. Critical normal tissues limit the efficacy of conventional photon therapy. This study reviews our experience of using combined high dose proton and photon radiation therapy following three-dimensional (3D) treatment planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between December 1980 and September 1992, 47 patients were treated at the Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Cyclotron Laboratory for primary or recurrent chordomas and chondrosarcomas (group 1, 20 patients), osteogenic sarcomas (group 2, 15 patients) and giant cell tumors, osteo-or chondroblastomas (group 3, 12 patients). Radiation treatment was given postoperatively in 23 patients, pre- and postoperatively in 17 patients, and 7 patients received radiation therapy as definitive treatment modality following biopsy only. The proton radiation component was delivered using a 160 MeV proton beam and the photon component using megavoltage photons up to 23 MV energy with 1.8-2.0 Cobalt Gray Equivalent (CGE) per fraction, once a day. Total external beam target dose ranged from 55.3 CGE to 82.0 CGE with mean target doses of 73.9 CGE (group 1), 69.8 CGE (group 2), and 61.8 CGE (group 3).

RESULTS

Group 1 (chordoma and chondrosarcoma): Five of 14 patients (36%) with chordoma recurred locally, and 2 out of 5 patients developed distant metastasis, resulting in 1 death from disease. A trend for improved local control was noted for primary vs. recurrent tumors, target doses > 77 CGE and gross total resection. All patients with chondrosarcoma achieved and maintained local control and disease-free status. Five-year actuarial local control and overall survival rates were 53% and 50% for chordomas and 100% and 100% for chondrosarcomas, respectively. Group 2 (osteogenic sarcoma): Three of 15 patients (20%) never achieved local control and died within 6 months of completion of radiation treatment. Only 1 out of 12 patients who were controlled for more than 6 months failed locally, yielding a 5-year local control rate of 59% for 15 patients. Overall, 4 patients (27%) developed distant metastasis (two in patients with uncontrolled primary); 4 patients succumbed to their disease, 3 patients died of intercurrent disease, resulting in overall survival of 44% at 5 years. Group 3 (giant cell tumors, osteo- and chondroblastoma): One of 8 patients with giant cell tumor failed locally, 1 patient distantly, and all patients are alive. Three of 4 patients with osteo- or chondroblastoma are alive and well. One patient suffered local recurrence and died of disease. Local control rate and overall survival for this group of 12 patients was 76% and 87% and local control for patients with giant cell tumors 83% at 5 years. In the majority of cases radiotherapy was well tolerated. However, one patient with a large base of skull tumor developed retinopathy, one patient required enucleation of a previously blind eye, and another patient with sacral tumor developed chronic diarrhea.

CONCLUSION

Combined proton and photon radiation therapy optimized by 3D treatment planning, allows the delivery of higher radiation doses to tumors of the axial skeleton, while respecting normal tissue constraints. High radiation doses can result in improved long-term local control.

A comparison of proton and megavoltage X-ray treatment planning for prostate cancer

Conformal photon and proton therapy plans for prostate cancer have been compared in an attempt to quantify the potential advantages of using protons. Two X-ray plans (3-field, 6-field) and a 2-field proton plan were made and compared for each of 20 T3 prostate patients with the aid of the 3D planning system VOXELPLAN. Dose distributions were analysed in terms of dose-volume histograms (DVH). Tumour control probability (TCP) and normal tissue complication probability (NTCP) were computed using our own and the Lyman-Kutcher-Burman models, respectively. The study shows that on average the proton technique results in the best dose distribution, giving the lowest rectal complication probability, and also that the 3-field X-ray technique is more effective than the 6-field X-ray technique in sparing the rectum. At 5% rectal NTCP, the predicted proton average TCP for the 20 patients is 2% (in absolute terms) greater than that obtained using 3-field X-ray therapy. For 7 of the patients the gain in TCP is more than 3%. For the same rectal NTCP as the 3-field X-ray plan with a 64 Gy mean target dose, the use of protons increases the TCP by 2% on average, but for 5 of the patients the increases are greater than 4%. The result is in general positive towards the use of protons but a few patients do not benefit from it and this indicates the importance of patient selection for maximum clinical benefit.

Prospects for proton-beam radiotherapy

Proton beams are already being employed for radiation therapy in 15 centres worldwide and over a dozen more are planned. Good clinical results have been reported in uveal melanomas and in sarcomas of the skull base. Calculated dose distributions for the treatment of brain, lung, head and neck and pelvic tumours predict an improvement relative to multiple-field or conformal photon radiotherapy. Protons may well provide high-precision radiotherapy that will lead to improved treatment of certain tumours in specific anatomical locations.

Current developments in proton therapy: a review

The use of high-energy protons in radiotherapy was first proposed in 1946. In the last decade there has been a significant growth in the number of centres using protons in the treatment of malignant and non-malignant disease. To date (January 1993) a total of more than 11,500 patients have been treated world-wide. Encouraging clinical results have been reported in the literature. The purpose of this article is to outline the advantages of proton beams and to review current developments in physics and engineering applied to the field of proton therapy with particular emphasis on proton accelerator technology and the development of proton therapy facilities. The production of clinically useful beams is discussed and the relative merits of different treatment systems compared. Reference is also made to the factors affecting the absorbed dose in a patient and to proton radiobiology together with the results of studies of comparisons of treatment planning with protons with that using conventional photon therapy. The dosimetry of proton beams is also reviewed.

Preliminary results in heavy charged particle irradiation of bone sarcoma

Between 1979 and 1989, 17 patients with unfavorable bone sarcoma were treated wholly or in part with heavy charged particle irradiation (helium and/or neon ions) at the University of California Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory. The majority of tumors were located near critical structures such as the spinal cord or brain. Gross tumor was present in all but two patients at the time of irradiation. Six patients were treated for recurrent disease. Histologies included osteosarcoma, Ewing's sarcoma, and recurrent osteoblastoma. Four of the osteosarcomata were believed to have been induced by previous therapeutic irradiation for various tumors. Follow-up time since initiation of radiation ranged from 7 to 118 months (median 40 months). The 5-year Kaplan-Maier local control rate was 48%; the corresponding survival rate was 41%. Over half the patients succumbed to distant metastases despite the majority of patients receiving chemotherapy. In this preliminary study, we have shown that heavy charged particle irradiation can be effectively used for control of bone sarcoma. A Phase II trial is warranted to determine optimal treatment for unresectable or gross residual disease.