Intracavitary brachytherapy combined with external-beam irradiation for squamous cell carcinoma of the thoracic esophagus

The role of brachytherapy in treatment of stage I esophageal cancer: A systematic review

PURPOSE

Despite advancements in the early detection of esophageal cancer, optimal radiotherapy methods for treatment of early disease have not yet been determined. Moreover, the benefit of intraluminal brachytherapy on local control or survival remains controversial. We performed a systematic review to establish the role of brachytherapy as boost therapy in stage I esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, and to evaluate associated survival outcomes.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A systematic search of three bibliographic databases from January 1950 to January 2019 was conducted. All studies investigating brachytherapy for curative intent were included and palliative treatment was excluded. Primary outcomes included overall survival and disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary outcomes included loco-regional control (LRC) and toxicity grades and/or complications. Two reviewers independently abstracted data and evaluated study quality using grading of recommendations assessment, development, and evaluation, pooled results were presented through risk ratios.

RESULTS

A total of 12 retrospective studies met inclusion criteria. The overall quality of evidence yielded a Grade 1C rating (strong recommendation, low quality evidence). Of 525 included patients, 325 patients received both external beam radiation (EBRT), and brachytherapy, 132 underwent EBRT only, and 68 received brachytherapy with and/or without chemoradiation. For patient group treated with EBRT and brachytherapy, 5-year mortality, DFS and LRC were: 43% (27-59%), 63% (49-76%) and 72% (63-80%) respectively. Rates of complications reported included 82.1% Grade 1 esophagitis for a combined external beam radiation and brachytherapy cohort, 12.3% ulcerations, and 3.3% fistulae.

CONCLUSIONS

Brachytherapy as a combined modality is encouraging, given its relative safety and effectiveness. Further prospective analysis using higher quality evidence is warranted to evaluate oncologic outcomes and survival advantage.

Endoluminal High-Dose-Rate Brachytherapy with a Palliative aim in Esophageal Cancer: Preliminary Results at the Institut Gustave Roussy

Ten patients with advanced esophageal carcinoma were treated with endoluminal high-dose-rate brachytherapy at the Institut Gustave Roussy. Eight of them had recurrences after external beam radiotherapy. They were treated with a high-dose rate iridium-192 source. Five patients received 6 sessions of 4 Gy, 4 patients 3 sessions of 4 Gy, and 1 patient received 3 sessions of 8 Gy. The interval time between each session was 1 week. Seventy percent of patients improved their dysphagia, with 80% endoscopic tumor response. The Karnofsky index was improved in most of the patients. The mean survival was 4 months, and dysphagiafree survival was 2.5 months. Two patients had treatment toxicity but only a transitory WHO G1 esophagitis. Endoesophageal high-dose-rate curietherapy seems an effective technique in palliative treatments. We found low toxicity and an excellent tolerance to treatment in previously irradiated patients. The efficacy of the treatment is highly dependent on a precise tumor volume evaluation.

External beam radiation and high-dose-rate brachytherapy for elderly patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively observe and analyze the long-term treatment outcomes of 96 elderly patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJAC) who were treated with californium-252 (²⁵²Cf) neutron brachytherapy (NBT) in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) with or without chemotherapy.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

From January 2002 to November 2012, 96 patients with GEJAC underwent treatment. The total radiation dose to the reference point via NBT was 8-25 Gy-eq in 2 to 5 fractions, with 1 fraction per week. The total dose via EBRT was 40-54 Gy, which was delivered over a period of 4 to 5.5 weeks with normal fraction.

RESULTS

The median survival time for the 96 patients was 15.3 months, and the 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year rates of overall survival (OS) were 62.5%, 33.7%, 20.1%, and 7.9%, respectively. The 1-, 2-, 3-, and 5-year rates for local-regional control (LRC) were 78.7%, 57.9%, 41.8%, and 26.4%, respectively. The patients' age was an independent factor that was significantly associated with OS (p = 0.006) and LRC (p = 0.0005), according to univariate analysis. The 3-year OS (LRC) was 31.9% (62.9%) for patients aged 70-74 years and 16.1% (19.5%) for patients aged ≥ 75 years. From the time of treatment completion to the development of local-regional recurrence or death, 5 (5.2%) patients experienced fistula and 7 (7.3%) experienced massive bleeding.

CONCLUSIONS

The clinical data indicated that NBT in combination with EBRT produced favorable local control and long-term survival rates for elderly patients with GEJAC, and that the side effects were tolerable. The patient's age could be used to select the appropriate treatment in an elderly patient.

Safety and outcome of external beam radiation and neutron brachytherapy in elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer

Purpose

The aim of this study was to retrospectively observe and analyze the long-term treatment outcomes of 191 elderly patients with esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC) who were treated with californium-252 (²⁵²Cf) neutron brachytherapy (NBT) in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT).

Material and methods

From January 2002 to November 2012, 191 patients with ESCC underwent NBT in combination with EBRT. The total radiation dose to the reference point via NBT was 8-25 Gy-eq in two to five fractions with one fraction per week. The total dose via EBRT was 50-60 Gy, which was delivered over a period of 5 to 6 weeks with normal fractionation.

Results

The median survival time for the 191 patients was 23.6 months, and the 5-year rates for overall survival (OS) and local-regional control (LRC) were 28.7% and 54.2%, respectively. The patients’ age was a factor that was significantly associated with OS (p = 0.010), according to univariate analysis. The 5-year OS (LRC) was 37.3% (58.6%) for patients aged 70-74 years and 14.5% (47.9%) for patients aged > 74 years (p = 0.010 and p = 0.038). In multivariate analysis, age and clinical N stage were associated with OS and LRC (p = 0.011 [0.041] and p = 0.005 [0.005]). From the time of treatment completion to the development of local-regional recurrence or death, 5 (2.6%) patients experienced fistula and 15 (7.9%) experienced massive bleeding. The incidence of severe late complications was related to older age (p = 0.027), higher NBT dose/fraction (20-25 Gy/5 fractions), and higher total dose (> 66 Gy).

Conclusions

The clinical data indicated that NBT in combination with EBRT produced favorable local control and long-term survival rates for elderly patients with ESCC, and that the side effects were tolerable. Patient’s age, clinical stage N status, and radiation dose could be used to select the appropriate treatment for elderly patients.

A retrospective study of external beam radiation, neutron brachytherapy, and concurrent chemotherapy for patients with localized advanced carcinoma of the esophagus

Purpose

The aim of this study was to retrospectively observe and analyze the long-term treatment outcomes of a total of 140 esophageal cancer patients who were treated with californium-252 (²⁵²Cf) neutron brachytherapy (NBT) in combination with external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) and concurrent chemotherapy (CCT).

Methods and materials

From January 2002 to November 2012, 140 patients with esophageal cancer underwent NBT in combination with EBRT and CCT. The distribution of the patient numbers over the various cancer stages of IIA, IIB, and III were 43, 7, and 90, respectively. The total radiation dose to the reference point via NBT was 8–25 Gy-eq in two to five fractions with one fraction per week. The total dose via EBRT was 50–60 Gy, which was delivered over a period of five to six weeks with normal fractionation. Fifty-four and 86 patients received tegafur suppositories (TS) and continuous infusion of fluorouracil (5-Fu) with cisplatin (CDDP), respectively.

Results

The median follow-up time was 42 months. The minimum follow-up was three months, and the maximum was 106 months. The overall median survival including death from all causes was 29.5 months. The five-year overall survival rate (OS) and local control (LC) were 33.4% and 55.9%, respectively. The chemotherapy regimen was a factor that was significantly associated with OS (p = 0.025) according to univariate analysis. The five-year OSs were 27.4% and 44.3% for the PF and TS chemotherapy regimens, respectively. Regarding acute toxicity, no incidences of fistula or massive bleeding were observed during this treatment period. The incidence of severe, late complications was related to the PF chemotherapy regimen (p = 0.080).

Conclusions

The clinical data indicated that NBT in combination with EBRT and CRT produced favorable local control and long-term survival rates for patients with esophageal cancer and that the side effects were tolerable. A reasonable CRT regimen can decrease the rate of severe, late complications.

The safety and usefulness of neutron brachytherapy and external beam radiation in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma with or without chemotherapy

Purpose

To assess the safety and usefulness of neutron brachytherapy (NBT) as an adjuvant in the treatment of patients with gastroesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEJAC) with external beam radiation (EBRT), with or without chemotherapy.

Methods and Materials

In total, 197 patients with localized, advanced GEJAC received EBRT and NBT with or without chemotherapy. Radiotherapy consisted of external irradiation to a total dose of 40–54 Gy (median 50 Gy) and brachytherapy to 8–25 Gy (median 20 Gy) in two to five fractions. In total, 88 patients received chemotherapy that consisted of two cycles of a regimen with CDDP and 5FU from days l-4. The cycles were administered on days 1 and 29. MMC was given alone in bolus injection on day 1 each week. The cycles were administered on days 1, 8, 15 and 22.

Results

The duration of follow-up ranged from six to 106 months (median 30.4 months). The median survival time for the 197 patients was 13.3 months, and the one, two, three- and five-year rates for overall survival were 57.1%, 35.1%, 23.0% and 9.2%, respectively. For acute toxicity, no incidences of fistula and massive bleeding were observed during this treatment period. In total, 159 (80.7%) patients developed Grade 2 hematologic toxicity and 146 (74.1%) patients developed Grade ≥ 2 esophagitis. The median times of incidence of fistula and bleeding were 9.5 (3–27.3) months and 12.7 (5–43.4) months, respectively. The incidence of severe, late complications was related to higher NBT dose/f (20–25 Gy/5 F) and higher total dose(≥70 Gy). In total, 75.2% of the patients resumed normal swallowing and 2.0% had some residual dysphagia (non-malignant) requiring intermittent dilatation.

Conclusion

A combination of EBRT and NBT with the balloon type applicator was feasible and well tolerated. Better local-regional control and overall survival cannot achieved by a higher dose, and in contrast, a higher dose caused more severe esophageal injury.

Effectiveness of Two High-dose-rate Intraluminal Brachytherapy Schedules for Symptom Palliation in Carcinoma Esophagus: A Tertiary Care Center Experience

Aim:

The aim was to analyze different radiation schedules with high-dose-rate (HDR) brachytherapy in patients with unresectable carcinoma esophagus in terms of dysphagia-free survival (DyFS), local control (LC), disease-free survival (DFS), and complications.

Materials and Methods:

Eighty-six patients were studied under three different radiation schedules: Schedule A – radiation 35 Gy/15# followed by HDR brachytherapy 6 Gy each in two sessions; schedule B – chemoradiation 35 Gy/15# with weekly injection cisplatin 30 mg/m² infusion and 5-fluorouracil 325 mg/m² bolus followed by HDR brachytherapy 6 Gy each in two sessions; and schedule C – same chemoradiation dose followed by HDR brachytherapy three sessions of 4.68 Gy each. The median follow-up was 12.1 months.

Results:

Treatment compliance was good. There were no significant differences in the incidence of acute toxicities across the three schedules. No grade III toxicities were noted. At 1 month, 27 patients had dysphagia improvement, which was not different across the three schedules. At 6 months, schedule C showed a trend toward better symptom control of dysphagia (dysphagia free=55%). The 2-year DyFS reached 49.5% in schedule C. Two-year LC rates were approximating 89% in both chemoradiation schedules versus 67.6% in schedule A. The 2-year DFS was also high in chemoradiation schedules. Major complications like ulceration and tracheoesophageal fistulas were more often seen with schedule B with a higher dose per fraction of the brachytherapy schedule.

Conclusion:

In unresectable carcinoma esophagus, radiation-only schedules are associated with lower LC and DFS rates. Concurrent chemoradiation followed by a brachytherapy boost is feasible in suitable patients with a good Karnofsky performance score and are associated with higher DyFS, LC, and DFS with acceptable toxicities. Still there is a need for the standardization of HDR brachytherapy schedules with chemoradiation protocols.

Comparison of efficacy and safety of low-dose-rate vs. high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy boost in patients with superficial esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy and the incidence of complications of high-dose-rate (HDR) and low-dose-rate (LDR) intraluminal brachytherapy (IBT) boost after external beam radiation therapy in patients with superficial esophageal cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Fifty-four consecutive patients with Stage I thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma who were treated with definitive radiotherapy using IBT between 1991 and 2007 were studied retrospectively. LDR-IBT and HDR-IBT were performed for 19 and 35 patients, respectively. After external beam radiation therapy of 56-60 Gy with a conventional fractionation, LDR-IBT (5 Gy × 2) or HDR-IBT (3 Gy × 3) was given within 2 weeks. The median follow-up was 47 months (7-151 months).

RESULTS

Overall, the 5-year overall survival, cause-specific survival (CSS), and locoregional control (LRC) rates were 61%, 86%, and 79%, respectively. The 5-year overall survival, CCS, and LRC rates did not differ significantly between the LDR-IBT and HDR-IBT groups (68% vs. 58% (p=0.50), 83% vs. 85% (p=0.63), and 84% vs. 75% (p=0.42), respectively). Salvage treatment was given in 8 locally recurrent patients, and 6 patients were rescued. The Grade ≥2 late morbidities of esophagus and heart/lung were observed in 5 patients (4 in the LDR-IBT group and 1 in the HDR-IBT group) and 2 patients (one from each group), respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

In view of the safety profile and effectiveness, our results encourage the continued adoption of HDR-IBT as radiation boost in medically inoperable or elderly superficial esophageal cancer patients undergoing definitive radiotherapy.

External beam radiation therapy followed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy for inoperable superficial esophageal carcinoma

PURPOSE

The aim of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the feasibility, efficacy, and tolerance of external beam radiotherapy followed by high-dose-rate brachytherapy in inoperable patients with superficial esophageal cancer.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From November 1992 to May 1999, 66 patients with superficial esophageal cancer were treated with exclusive radiotherapy. The median age was 60 years (range, 41-85). Fifty-three percent of them were ineligible for surgery owing to synchronous or previously treated head-and-neck cancer. Most of the patients (n = 49) were evaluated with endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS) or computed tomography (CT). The mean doses of external beam radiotherapy and high-dose rate brachytherapy were 57.1 Gy (+/-4.83) and 8.82 Gy (+/-3.98), respectively. The most frequently used regimen was 60 Gy followed by 7 Gy at 5 mm depth in two applications.

RESULTS

Among patients evaluated with EUS or CT, the complete response rate was 98%. The 3-, 5-, and 7-year survival rates were 57.9%, 35.6%, and 26.6%, respectively. Median overall survival was 3.8 years. The 5-year relapse-free survival and cause-specific survival were 54.6% and 76.9%. The 5-year overall, relapse-free, and cause-specific survival of the whole population of 66 patients was 33%, 53%, and 77%, respectively. Local failure occurred in 15 of 66 patients; 6 were treated with brachytherapy. Severe late toxicity (mostly esophageal stenosis) rated according to the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group/European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer scale occurred in 6 of 66 patients (9%).

CONCLUSION

This well tolerated regimen may be a therapeutic alternative for inoperable patients with superficial esophageal cancer. Only a randomized study could be able to check the potential benefit of brachytherapy after external beam radiation in superficial esophageal cancer.

The safety and usefulness of high-dose-rate endoluminal brachytherapy as a boost in the treatment of patients with esophageal cancer with external beam radiation with or without chemotherapy

PURPOSE

This study reports the results of a single-institution experience with high-dose-rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) used as a boost in the treatment of esophageal cancer with external beam radiation therapy (ERT) with or without chemotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Patients without evidence of metastatic disease were identified. HDRBT was given before ERT with a dose of 20 Gy in 5 fractions. Patients with a Karnofsky performance of more than 70 received treatment with 50 Gy in 25 fractions and concurrent 5-fluorouracil and cis-platinum during Weeks 1 and 5, whereas patients with a Karnofsky performance of less than 70 were treated with radiation therapy alone with 35 Gy in 14 fractions.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients received HDRBT treatment with combined ERT and chemotherapy and 17 patients with ERT alone. The incidence of acute bone marrow toxicity was 55% Grade 2 and 15% Grade 3, and 85% of patients had Grade 2 esophagitis. With a median follow-up time of 26 months, the median survival was 21 months; the 2-year local recurrence was 25%, and the 5-year survival rate was 28%.

CONCLUSION

HDRBT is safe and beneficial for local control in the radical treatment of patients with esophageal cancer.

Severe complications after hypofractionated high dose rate intracavitary brachytherapy following external beam irradiation for oesophageal carcinoma

The purpose of this study was to evaluate severe complications that developed after high dose rate (HDR) intracavitary brachytherapy for oesophageal carcinoma. Six consecutive patients with oesophageal carcinoma were treated by external beam irradiation (60 Gy in 30 fractions over 6 weeks) followed by hypofractionated intracavitary HDR brachytherapy (10 Gy in 2 fractions). Two of the six patients were alive and well for more than 2-3 years following therapy, but three of the six patients developed treatment-related oesophageal fistulae and died. HDR intracavitary brachytherapy following external beam irradiation is an effective method for radical treatment of oesophageal carcinoma. However, hypofractionated HDR brachytherapy should be used with care.

Chemoradiation in conservation therapy for esophageal cancer

Irradiation alone can be highly beneficial for patients with advanced or metastatic esophageal cancer, but external beam irradiation alone is now usually reserved for patients only requiring palliation. Higher cure rates are achieved with irradiation delivered with radiosensitizing chemotherapy based on clinical trials performed over the last decade. Chemoradiation programs based on the modest success with infusional 5-FU, cisplatin, and 50 Gy are justified for either palliative or curative treatment as long as the toxicity is acceptable. One challenge is to increase the incidence of pathologic complete response rates without incurring unacceptable acute toxicity, which is the major dose-limiting factor in current trials. Newer methods that may ameliorate acute injury are different dose schedules for chemoradiation and different methods of dose delivery. Infusional administration of chemotherapy and new dose planning and delivery systems for irradiation (conformal irradiation) are currently under study. Organ preservation for larger numbers of patients may be possible if any of these methods hold up to the early indications of success.

External beam radiotherapy and intraluminal brachytherapy in advanced inoperable esophageal cancer: JIPMER experience

From January 1994 to September 1998, all inoperable cases of cancer of the esophagus at Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research (JIPMER), Pondicherry, India were given external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) 36 Gy/18 times by anteroposterior pair. After EBRT, those patients who could be intubated with 16 F Levine's tube either directly or after endoscopic dilatation were given intraluminal brachytherapy (ILBT) 36 Gy in 48 hours at 1 cm. Others were treated by EBRT by posterior oblique fields 24 Gy/12 times. Fifty-eight patients who received EBRT and ILBT formed the study group. Fifty percent had middle one third growth and except for three, all were squamous cell carcinoma (95%). Fifty-nine percent required postradiation endoscopic dilatation. The overall survival rate was 24% at the end of 1 year. In one patient, tracheoesophageal fistula developed 4 months after treatment. Mild-to-moderate acute esophagitis developed in 10% of the patients, and 2% had slight hemoptysis, but these were not significant enough to interrupt treatment. There was no treatment-related mortality. Thirty-four patients (59%) were followed up for 6 months to 5 years (mean, 9.6 months). Three patients had follow-up of more than 3 years with no evidence of disease. EBRT with ILBT, with intermittent esophageal dilatations as required, offers very good palliation in advanced inoperable cancer of the esophagus.

The role of brachytherapy for palliation

The goal of palliative radiation is to alleviate symptoms in a short amount of time and maintain an optimal functional and quality-of-life level while minimizing toxicity and patient inconvenience. Despite advances in multimodality antineoplastic therapies, failure to control the tumor at its primary site frustratingly remains the predominant source of morbidity and mortality in many patients with cancer. Escalation of doses of radiation using external beam irradiation has been shown to improve local tumor control, but limits are imposed by the tolerance of normal surrounding structures. The highly conformal nature of brachytherapy enables the radiation oncologist to accomplish safe escalation of radiation doses to the tumor while minimizing doses to normal surrounding structures. Thus, by enhancing the potential for local control, brachytherapy used alone or as a supplement to external beam radiation therapy retains a significant and important role in achieving the goals of palliation. Proper patient selection, excellent technique, and adherence to implant rules will minimize the risk of complications. The advantages realized with the use of brachytherapy include good patient tolerance, short treatment time, and high rates of sustained palliation. This article reviews various aspects of palliative brachytherapy, including patient selection criteria, implant techniques, treatment planning, dose and fractionation schedules, results, and complications of treatment. Tumors of the head and neck, trachea and bronchi, esophagus, biliary tract, and brain, all in which local failure represents the predominant cause of morbidity and mortality, are highlighted.

Radiation treatment for cervical esophagus: patterns of practice study in Canada, 1996

PURPOSE

To assess the patterns of practice among Canadian radiation oncologists who treat esophageal cancers, using a trans-Canada survey, completed at the end of 1996.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One of 3 case presentations of different stages of cervical esophageal cancer was randomly assigned and sent to participating radiation oncologists by mail. Respondents were asked to fill in questionnaires regarding treatment techniques and to outline target volumes for the boost phase of radiotherapy. Radiation oncologists from 26 of 27 (96%) of all Canadian centers participated.

RESULTS

High-energy X-rays (>/= 10 MV) were employed by 68% of the respondents in part of the treatment course. The majority (83%) of the radiation oncologists used at least two phases of treatment. Very few, 10 of 59 (17%), responses started with multifield treatment. The most frequently used prescription dose was 60 Gy/30 fractions/6 weeks, given with concurrent chemotherapy. Dose prescriptions were to the isocenter in 39 of 48 (81%) or to a particular isodose line in 9 of 48 (19%) of respondents.

CONCLUSION

There was a variety of radiation treatment techniques in this trans-Canada survey. The majority of the patients had combined cisplatin-based chemoradiation. The isocenter was not used consistently as a dose prescription point.

Palliation of advanced esophageal carcinoma by photodynamic therapy and irradiation

BACKGROUND

We wanted to determine the role of photodynamic therapy in a multimodal approach for the treatment of patients with advanced cancer of the esophagus.

METHODS

We reviewed the cases of 119 patients with nonresectable esophageal carcinoma who underwent endoluminal palliation. Twenty-one patients required initial dilation and tumor obliteration with a neodymium: yttrium-aluminum-garnet laser prior to therapy. Forty-four patients received photodynamic therapy followed by brachyradiotherapy, and 75 patients were treated with brachyradiotherapy. In both groups, some patients also received external-beam irradiation.

RESULTS

Photodynamic therapy produced a significant difference in relieving stenosis caused by tumor stenosis (mean, 6.6 mm; p = 0.0000). The dysphagia score improved by one to three levels in all patients, with a significant difference in favor of PDT (p = 0.0003). The mean number of overall treatment sessions was four (range, one to seven). The rate of major complications was 9.2%. Four esophageal perforations occurred, three after intervention and one spontaneously 5 months later. Four esophagorespiratory tract fistulas developed several months after combined PDT and irradiation. The mean overall survival was 7.7 months, and analysis of variance revealed a significant difference in favor of PDT and external-beam irradiation (p = 0.0129 and p = 0.0001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Photodynamic therapy has been shown to be an effective palliative treatment of advanced esophageal cancer. However, proper patient selection is necessary to prevent serious complications.

Prognostic significance of the PC10 index for patients with stage II and III oesophageal cancer treated with radiotherapy

The monoclonal antibody PC10 is used for immunohistochemical staining of the proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA). The percentage of PC10-positive cancer cells is defined as the PC10 index. We evaluated the relationship between the PC10 index in pretreatment endoscopic biopsies and the prognoses of 47 patients with Stage II-III oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma treated with radiotherapy. The patients with a PC10 index > 40% had significantly poorer prognoses than the other patients (p = 0.0007). Proportional hazards model analysis indicated that only the PC10 index was a prognostic factor (p = 0.0009). The patient group of complete responders showed significantly lower PC10 indices compared to patients with a partial response or no change (p = 0.049). The PC10 index can be a good predictive indicator of the prognosis in patients with Stage II-III oesophageal cancer treated with radiotherapy.

High dose rate brachytherapy for superficial cancer of the esophagus

PURPOSE

We analyzed our experience with external radiotherapy, combined modality treatment, or HDR brachytherapy alone to limited esophageal cancers.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1991 to 1996, 25 patients with limited superficial esophagus carcinomas were treated by high dose rate brachytherapy. The mean age was 63 years (43-86 years). Five patients showed superficial local recurrence after external radiotherapy. Eleven patients without invasion of the basal membrane were staged as Tis. Fourteen patients with tumors involving the submucosa without spreading to the muscle were staged as T1. Treatment consisted of HDR brachytherapy alone in 13 patients, external radiotherapy and brachytherapy in 8 cases, and concomitant chemo- and radiotherapy in 4 cases. External beam radiation was administered to a total dose of 50 Gy using 2 Gy daily fractions in 5 weeks. In cases of HDR brachytherapy alone (13 patients), 6 applications were performed once a week.

RESULTS

The mean follow-up is 31 months (range 24-96 months). Twelve patients received 2 applications and 13 patients received 6 applications. Twelve patients experienced a failure (48%), 11/12 located in the esophagus, all of them in the treated volume. One patient presented an isolated distant metastasis. In the patients treated for superficial recurrence, 4/5 were locally controlled (80%) by brachytherapy alone. After brachytherapy alone, 8/13 patients were controlled (61%). The mean disease-free survival is 14 months (1-36 months). Overall survival is 76% at 1 year, 37% at 2 years, and 14% at 3 years. Overall survival for Tis patients is 24% vs. 20% for T1 (p = 0.83). Overall survival for patients treated by HDR brachytherapy alone is 43%. One patient presented with a fistula with local failure after external radiotherapy and brachytherapy. Four stenosis were registered, two were diagnosed on barium swallowing without symptoms, and two required dilatations.

CONCLUSION

High dose rate brachytherapy permits the treating of patients with superficial esophageal cancer with good tolerance. Early tumors, located in the mucosa, might be treated by HDR brachytherapy alone or by a combined modality treatment in which HDR brachytherapy can take place like a boost. This approach may cure localized recurrences.

Multi-institutional randomized trial of external radiotherapy with and without intraluminal brachytherapy for esophageal cancer in Japan. Japanese Society of Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology (JASTRO) Study Group

PURPOSE

With the aim of improving the results of treatment of esophageal cancer, we designed this multi-institutional, randomized trial to establish the optimal irradiation method in radical radiation therapy for esophageal cancer by clinically evaluating external irradiation alone and in combination with intraluminal brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The study population consisted of patients with squamous cell carcinoma who were expected to be successfully treated with radical radiation therapy. The patients who could be given intraluminal brachytherapy at the end of external irradiation of 60 Gy were stratified into 2 groups. Patients assigned to receive external irradiation alone received boost irradiation of 10 Gy/week on a schedule similar to the previous one, and with the same or smaller irradiation field. Intraluminal brachytherapy was performed, as a rule, with the reference dose point set at a depth of 5 mm of the esophageal submucosa, and a total of 10 Gy was irradiated at a daily dose of 5 Gy, on a once-weekly schedule with low-dose-rate or high-dose-rate brachytherapy equipment.

RESULTS

A total of 103 patients were registered, 94 of whom were analyzable, with 8 ineligible, and 1 for whom complete information was unavailable. The overall cumulative survival rate was 20.3% at 5 years. The cause-specific survival rate was 31.8% at 5 years. The cause-specific survival rate at 5 years was 27% in the external irradiation alone group and 38% in intraluminal brachytherapy combined group. There was no significant difference between the 2 groups (p = 0.385). However, in the patients with 5 cm or less tumor length, the cause-specific survival rate was 64% at 5 years in the intraluminal brachytherapy combined group, which showed a significant improvement over 31.5% in the external irradiation alone group (p = 0.025). In the patients with Stage T1 and T2 disease, cause-specific survival rates tended to be better in the intraluminal brachytherapy combined group than in the external irradiation alone group (p = 0.088). In the patients with more than 5 cm tumor length or Stage T3-4 disease, there were no significant differences between the two groups by treatment methods (p = 0.290). The incidence of early and late complications did not differ according to whether intraluminal brachytherapy was used.

CONCLUSION

For the purpose of establishing the usefulness of intraluminal brachytherapy, further prospective randomized studies are necessary to evaluate the efficacy in tumors with short length and those with shallow invasion, or to assess the usefulness of intraluminal brachytherapy, as additional irradiation in large advanced tumors have been shown to have disappeared by diagnostic imaging after chemoradiotherapy with 60 Gy/6w external irradiation.

Comparison between chemoradiation protocol intended for organ preservation and conventional surgery for clinical T1-T2 esophageal carcinoma

PURPOSE

This retrospective study was designed to compare treatment results of the chemoradiation protocol with conventional surgery for thoracic T1-T2 esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty-six patients with esophageal carcinoma, clinically diagnosed as T1 (tumor invading lamina propria or submucosa) or T2 (tumor invading muscularis propria) were treated for 12 consecutive years, from July 1986 to January 1998. The conventional surgery group included 30 patients who underwent esophagectomy with regional lymph node dissection. Twenty-one of them received postoperative radiotherapy. Thirty-six patients were assigned to the chemoradiation protocol, consisting of neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (44 Gy; CDDP: 60 mg/m2, day 1, bolus; 5-FU: 400 mg/m2, day 1-4, continuous), followed by either definitive radiotherapy with high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy (total 70 Gy) for responders or surgery for nonresponders as in the conventional surgery group. Surgical candidates in both groups received intraoperative radiotherapy for abdominal lymphatics since 1991.

RESULTS

In the protocol group, 4 patients underwent radical surgery after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy, and the remaining 32 underwent definitive chemoradiotherapy. Local control rates at 1 and 3 years were 85% and 70% in the T1/protocol group versus 91% and 80% in the T1/surgery group, and 83% and 83% in the T2/protocol group versus 94% and 80% in the T2/surgery group, respectively. There was no statistical significance. Overall 1- and 3-year survival rates were 100% and 83% in the T1/protocol group versus 82% and 72% in the T1/surgery group (p = 0.36), and 100% and 51% in the T2/protocol group, versus 95% and 68% in the T2/surgery group p = 0.61), respectively. There was no treatment-related mortality in either group. The rates of esophageal conservation were 92% in the T1/protocol group and 58% in the T2/protocol group.

CONCLUSION

The chemoradiation protocol can result in comparable survival with conventional surgery for patients with T1-T2 esophageal carcinoma. A randomized trial between definitive chemoradiotherapy and surgery is required.

Optimum fractionation for high-dose-rate endoesophageal brachytherapy following external irradiation of early stage esophageal cancer

PURPOSE

To establish the optimum fractionation for high-dose-rate (HDR) endoesophageal brachytherapy (EBT) for early stage esophageal cancer from retrospective data of patients treated with different HDR schedules following external beam irradiation (EBI).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The study population consisted of 35 consecutive early stage esophageal cancer patients who received EBI to the mediastinum, plus EBT, between May 1992 and November 1995 at the Hiroshima University Medical Center and Hiroshima City Hospital. All patients were treated with EBI, with doses ranging from 50 to 61 Gy. The spinal cord was spared after 44-45 Gy. HDR EBT was performed using a double-balloon applicator in conjunction with an Ir-192 remote afterloading system. One group of 10 patients was given a weekly endoesophageal boost of 4 or 5 Gy at a distance of 5 mm from the applicator surface over a period of 1-2 weeks. Another group of 25 patients was treated with 4 or 5 endoesophageal boosts with a fraction dose of either 2.5 or 2 Gy for 1 week. The linear quadratic (LQ) formula was used to calculate the biologically effective dose (BED) for tumor (Gy10) and esophageal mucosa (Gy3); Gy10 means alpha/beta equals 10 Gy, and Gy3 means alpha/beta equals 3 Gy. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to calculate the local control and late complication rates, while the Cox-Mantel test was used to evaluate statistical significance (p < 0.01).

RESULTS

Nine (26%) of the 35 patients recurred locally and 7 (20%) had late complications (esophageal ulcer grade by RTOG/EORTC criteria > 1). The 5-year overall survival, local control, and late complication rates were 38%, 57%, and 26%, respectively. The probability of local recurrence was not affected by the treatment parameters. Results from the LQ formula significantly correlate with data on late complications. A BED > 134 Gy3 and a fraction number = < 3 were associated with late complications (grade > 1). BED analysis showed that the fractionation dose should be decreased to 2.5 or 2.0 Gy at a distance of 5 mm from the applicator surface, and the number of doses increased to 4 or 5, respectively, to yield a satisfactory BED (< 134 Gy3).

CONCLUSION

A significant reduction in endoesophageal brachytherapy dose per fraction is necessary to reduce late complications. Our current treatment protocol for early-stage esophageal cancer consists of EBI of 60 Gy followed by 4 EBT doses at a fraction dose of 2.5 Gy applied over 1 week.

A non-randomized comparison of two radiotherapy protocols in inoperable squamous cell carcinoma of the oesophagus

We report an audit of two different telebrachytherapy schedules in inoperable carcinoma of the oesophagus. Between October 1990 and December 1996, 108 patients with a Karnofsky performance status > or = 50 were selected from our database on the basis of intention to treat by telebrachytherapy. Teletherapy in the low dose group L (55 patients) consisted of 35 Gy in 15 fractions over 3 weeks, while that in the high dose group H (53 patients) consisted of 50 Gy in 25 fractions over 5 weeks. The choice of teletherapy dose was based on physician preference. The high dose rate intraluminal radiotherapy that followed 2 weeks later was identical in both groups and consisted of two applications of 6 Gy, a week apart. The pretreatment disease characteristics of the patients in both arms were similar. Relief of dysphagia was obtained in 49% of the patients in group L and in 75% of those in group H (chi2: P = 0.004). The median dysphagia-free interval was 0 and 7 months in groups L and H respectively (log-rank: P = 0.06), while the median overall survival was identical at 8 months (log-rank: P = 0.21) for both groups. The probability of survival at 1, 2 and 5 years was 34.8% versus 35.8%, 14.5% versus 13.9% and 0% versus 10% for groups L and H respectively. Morbidity in the form of ulcers, strictures and fistulae were observed in 9%, 7% and 5% of patients in group L compared with 8%, 8% and 13% in groups H respectively. This audit suggests that the protocol used in group H, when compared with group L, results in a greater proportion of patients being rendered dysphagia free, with a statistical trend towards a greater sustainment of dysphagia relief on follow-up.

The role of radiotherapy in the surgical management of gastrointestinal cancer

Surgery is the main mode of treatment in most gastrointestinal malignancies. Radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy is playing an increasing role as an adjunct to improve local control, survival and palliation. The principles of radiotherapy and the rationale for combination therapy are presented. The current role of radiation therapy in the GI tract is discussed by various sites. New and investigational radiotherapy techniques are outlined.

[Radiotherapy in the multimodal treatment of esophageal carcinoma. A review]

BACKGROUND

The curative potential of exclusively applied surgery or radiotherapy on esophageal carcinoma is exhausted. The 5-year survival rate of surgically treated esophageal carcinoma is stagnant at 20 to 30%, that for radiotherapeutically treated esophageal carcinoma at < or = 10%. The unchanged bad prognoses motivate the search for multimodal therapeutical concepts in order to improve the results of basic therapies.

METHOD, RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS

While neither perioperative radiotherapy nor perioperative chemotherapy were able to improve the treatment results significantly, a progress in the field of primary and preoperative radiochemotherapy emerges. On locally restricted tumors the latest findings show that a simultaneous radiochemotherapy with Cisplatin is more effective than radiotherapy alone. 20 to 30% histologically verified complete remissions can be reached through preoperative radiochemotherapy. These results will influence future treatment concepts. Brachytherapy can be taken into consideration in highly palliative situations as exclusive method of treatment or for support of laser treatment or bouginage for removal of stenosis. As the number of clinically controlled studies is not sufficient the importance of the brachytherapy boost for potentially curative intentions is not yet clear. Up to now the intraluminal hyperthermia is a underestimated method for improving the results of radiotherapy. Our overview summarizes all presently published randomized studies and relevant phase I/II-studies.

Treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus with alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy (cisplatin, methotrexate, and peplomycin)

Between 1985 and 1990, 20 patients with stage 2 and 3 esophageal cancer without esophagopulmonary fistulas were treated with alternating radiotherapy and chemotherapy (cisplatin, methotrexate, and peplomycin). Patients given the combined therapy received courses of chemotherapy during weeks 1 and 6 and radiotherapy during weeks 2-5 and 7-9. Chemotherapy consisted of i.v. cisplatin (80 mg/ m2 of body surface area) on day 1, i.v. methotrexate (40 mg/ m2) on day 2, and s.c. peplomycin (10 mg/day) continuously from day 2 to day 5. Radiotherapy was external irradiation with or without intracavitary irradiation. In seven cases, external irradiation alone was administered at 65-70 Gy, and in 13 cases, external irradiation (50-55 Gy) was combined with intracavitary irradiation (14-20 Gy). At the end of treatment, the rate of complete response was 60% with an overall response rate of 95%. Five-year total survival was 25%; cause-specific survival was 36.8%. The most common acute toxicities were bone marrow suppression, hepatic and renal damage, pneumonitis, and esophagitis. There was no life-threatening toxicity.

A phase I/II study of external beam radiation, brachytherapy and concurrent chemotherapy in localized cancer of the esophagus (RTOG 92-07): preliminary toxicity report

PURPOSE

A multi-institutional, prospective study was designed to determine the feasibility and tolerance of external beam irradiation plus concurrent chemotherapy and esophageal brachytherapy (EB) in a potentially curable group of patients with adenocarcinoma or squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Planned treatment was 50 Gy external beam radiation (25 fractions/5 weeks) followed 2 weeks later by EB [either high dose rate (HDR) 5 Gy, weeks 8, 9, and 10, for a total of 15 Gy, or low dose rate (LDR) 20 Gy, week 8]. The protocol was later revised to delete the LDR alternative, owing to poor accrual, and to decrease the HDR dose to 10 Gy (i.e. 5 Gy, weeks 8 and 9). Chemotherapy was given weeks 1, 5, 8, and 11 with cisplatin 75 mg/m2 and 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg2/m per 24 h, 96-h infusion. The study closed in January 1995 after 56 patients had been entered on the HDR arm. Six patients were declared ineligible owing to tumor extension to the gastroesophageal junction (three patients) or involved celiac lymph nodes (three patients). Of the 50 eligible patients, the planned EB dose was 15 and 10 Gy in 40 and 10 patients, respectively. Forty-six (92%) of the eligible patients had squamous histology, and three (6%) adenocarcinoma.

RESULTS

Life-threatening toxicity or treatment-related death occurred in 13 (26%) and 4 (8%) of the 50 eligible patients, respectively. Treatment-related esophageal fistulas occurred in three patients (12% overall, 14% of patients starting EB) at 0.5-6.2 months from the first day of brachytherapy, leading to death in three. The fourth death was secondary to renal toxicity and infection attributed to chemotherapy. No correlation was found between the development of fistula and location of primary tumor, brachytherapy active length or applicator diameter. So far, 5 of the 6 treatment-related fistulas have occurred following 15 Gy EB. The other fistula occurred after only 5 Gy of a planned 15 Gy was delivered.

CONCLUSION

Thirty-five patients (70%) were able to complete external beam, EB, and at least two courses of chemotherapy. Estimated survival rate at 12 months is 48%, with an estimated 11-month median survival rate. Survival following external beam radiation plus concurrent chemotherapy and EB does not appear to be significantly different from survival seen following external beam radiation and chemotherapy only. The development of six fistulas in the 35 patients completing EB is of concern. Based on the high incidence of fistulas, we urge extreme caution in employing EB as a boost following concurrent external beam radiation and chemotherapy.

A single session of intraluminal brachytherapy in palliation of oesophageal cancer

Between September 1987 and September 1993, 88 patients with oesophageal cancer were treated by a single session of intraluminal brachytherapy of 15 Gy prescribed at 1 cm distance from the central axis, using MDR137Cs (n = 51) during the first part of the study and HDR192Ir (n = 37) during the second part of the study. All patients were regarded as inoperable. Improvement of dysphagia, assessed 4-6 weeks after treatment, was noted in 50 of 75 (67%) evaluable patients, whereas swallowing ability was completely restored in 47% of them. Relapse of dysphagia occurred in 28 (37%) patients during follow-up. Additional palliative treatment consisted of endoprosthesis in 14 (19%), a second course of brachytherapy in 13 (17%), one or more dilatations only in 11 (15%) and laser treatment in four (5%) patients. One non-fatal haemorrhage and five fistulae occurred, all in the presence of tumour. Two severe ulcerations without evidence of tumour were noted, both managed by combined curative treatment. The median survival of the group investigated was 5.5 months. An exophytic, non-circular growth pattern was associated with a better response. In a multivariate analysis the presence of distant metastases (p = 0.0028), weight loss (p = 0.0051) and an exophytic growth pattern (p = 0.0199) were associated with a worse survival. The present data indicate that a single session of ILB is appropriate in the palliation of dysphagia in patients with inoperable oesophagal cancer showing bad prognostic signs. Up to now there has been no clear evidence for benefit of addition of ERT.

Diagnosis and treatment of esophageal neoplasms

During the last 10 years, the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal carcinoma have improved considerably. Endoscopy with Lugol staining and endoscopic ultrasonography have been newly introduced and used for early diagnosis and more accurate tumor staging. As a result, the number of patients with tumors at an early stage has increased remarkably (superficial carcinoma, 23%). In the field of treatment, surgical results have improved not only in the short term (30-day mortality rate, 4%) but also in the long term (5-year survival rate, 30%). The field of operation has been extended (3-field lymph node dissection), with lower morbidity and mortality. On the other hand, some techniques for limited treatment such as endoscopic mucosal resection, intraluminal radiotherapy, and laser irradiation have been introduced for the treatment of esophageal carcinoma at an early stage with curative intent. However, there are still many patients with esophageal carcinoma at an advanced stage for whom these treatments fail or are futile. The role of radiotherapy has been made more significant by the introduction of brachytherapy or in combination with other treatment modalities such as surgery, chemotherapy and hyperthermia. Response rates for existing anticancer drugs used as a single agent are 0-38%. Chemotherapy appears to have created significant improvements when used in combined modalities (response rate, 16-76%). However, chemotherapy for patients with esophageal carcinoma still offers an unsatisfactory survival benefit and remains experimental. Studies to evaluate multimodality treatments using chemotherapy, combined with radiotherapy and/or surgery have started. The contribution of molecular biology to the diagnosis and treatment of this disease is a subject for future investigation.

Phase II trial of chemotherapy, external and intraluminal radiation plus surgery for oesophageal cancer

A pilot study was performed to assess the feasibility of combining 5-fluorouracil, recombinant alpha-2b-interferon, external radiation therapy and intraluminal high dose rate brachytherapy with surgery in patients with locally advanced esophageal carcinoma. 5-fluorouracil, 750 mg m-2, was administered via continuous 5-day infusion beginning day 1 and weekly thereafter; interferon, 10 mu subcutaneously, was administered three times per week beginning day 1 and sargramostin, 5 micrograms kg-1, was administered on days without 5-fluorouracil. External radiation began on day one using 1.5 daily fractions to 55.5 Gy. Intraluminal brachytherapy was delivered concomitantly once each week for 5 fractions of 4 Gy. None of the first eight patients went to surgery. The external radiation was changed to 1.5 Gy BID to 45 Gy followed by BID intraluminal radiation to 15 Gy. Of the last four patients, there was one case of radiation myelitis. It was found that successful surgery was not possible and excessive toxicities, including radiation myelitis, occurred with this aggressive regimen.

Esophageal cancer

Esophageal cancer is an important problem in the United States. It results in more deaths (over 10,000 annually) than rectal cancer. Furthermore, the incidence of esophageal adenocarcinoma is increasing at a rate faster than that of nearly any other cancer and the reasons for the increase are not well understood. A variety of tumor-suppressor genes (including p53, APC, DCC and Rb) and proto-oncogenes (including prad1, EGFR, c-erb-2 and TGF alpha) may be involved in the development and progression of esophageal cancer. Clinical prognostic factors include stage, Karnofsky performance status, sex, age, anatomic location of the tumor, and degree of weight loss. A new staging system based on depth of wall penetration and lymph node involvement correlates well with prognosis for patients undergoing esophagectomy. Newer staging procedures including endoscopic ultrasound as well as the use of minimally invasive surgery, such as thoracoscopy and laparoscopy, may allow accurate staging without esophagectomy. Surgical resection provides excellent palliation; however, the chance for cure with esophagectomy alone is only 10% to 20%. Adjuvant treatment with pre- or postesophagectomy radiation may improve local-regional control but does not improve survival. Nor has preoperative chemotherapy been shown to improve survival; however, it remains an active area of investigation. Multimodality therapy, namely, chemotherapy and radiation (chemoradiation), given concurrently prior to surgical resection shows promise, with one study indicating a 5-year survival of 34%. A complete pathologic response to chemoradiation correlates with improved survival. Chemoradiation has been shown to be superior to radiation as primary management of esophageal cancer. There has been no successfully completed randomized trial of surgery versus definitive radiation or chemoradiation. However, chemoradiation represents a reasonable alternative to esophagectomy in the primary management of squamous cell carcinoma of the esophagus and chemoradiation also appears to be effective in the treatment of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagus, offering significant palliation and a chance for long-term survival as well. Randomized studies of preoperative chemoradiation versus surgery or versus chemoradiation alone are needed. The treatment of advanced esophageal cancer must be directed toward palliation of symptoms. Newer endoscopic techniques, including the use of expansile metal stents, laser ablation, intraluminal high-dose rate brachytherapy, BICAP tumor probe, or photodynamic therapy, offer selected patients short-term palliation.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Adjuvant therapies for cancer of the thoracic esophagus

During the past four decades, especially in recent years, various active adjuvant therapies combined with surgery have improved the outcome in cases of cancer of the esophagus. However, no optimum adjuvant therapy has been determined. From 1981 to 1992, 341 patients with regional and distant node metastasis who underwent curative surgery were treated with postoperative radiotherapy (RT), postoperative radiochemotherapy (RC), and postoperative aggressive chemotherapy (AGC) in a controlled study in our department of surgery. Five-year survival rates, including operative deaths and unrelated diseases of the former group, were 0% for RT, 19.9% for surgery alone, 39.8% for RC, and 48.2% for AGC. Such rates for the latter group were 6.8% for AGC, 13.3% for surgery alone, and 33.3% for RC. In addition, results of a group study on the effectiveness of three-field node dissection in 715 cases of thoracic esophageal carcinoma by 10 institutions were analyzed. This analysis showed that there were no differences in the 5-year survival rate of curative surgery in cases with positive nodes among the groups treated with surgery alone (SA), with postoperative radiotherapy (PR), and with postoperative chemotherapy (PC). As to the 91 cases with positive cervical nodes, the 3-year survival rates in cases treated with SA (n = 22), PR (n = 20), and PC (n = 49) were 25.3%, 48.1%, and 53.6%, respectively; a significant improvement of survival in these patients. Summaries of studies of preoperative or postoperative radiotherapy, and both multimodal therapies are introduced.

Esophageal ulceration following high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy for esophageal cancer

Prophylaxis of esophageal ulceration was studied in 78 esophageal carcinoma patients after high-dose-rate intraluminal brachytherapy. Before the standard treatment regimen of radiotherapy was established, 15/17 patients developed ulcers. This decreased to 19/38 with the standard treatment regimen, and to 9/23 when antiulcer therapy was added (p < 0.01).