Reversion of radiosensitivity in azacytidine-treated XRS5 cells does not result in full radioprotection by WR-1065

Impact of genomic methylation on radiation sensitivity of colorectal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To investigate the influence of demethylation with 5-aza-cytidine (AZA) on radiation sensitivity and to define the intrinsic radiation sensitivity of methylation deficient colorectal carcinoma cells.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Radiation sensitizing effects of AZA were investigated in four colorectal carcinoma cell lines (HCT116, SW480, L174 T, Co115), defining influence of AZA on proliferation, clonogenic survival, and cell cycling with or without ionizing radiation. The methylation status for cancer or DNA damage response-related genes silenced by promoter methylation was determined. The effect of deletion of the potential target genes (DNMT1, DNMT3b, and double mutants) on radiation sensitivity was analyzed.

RESULTS

AZA showed radiation sensitizing properties at >or=1 micromol/l, a concentration that does not interfere with the cell cycle by itself, in all four tested cell lines with a sensitivity-enhancing ratio (SER) of 1.6 to 2.1 (confidence interval [CI] 0.9-3.3). AZA successfully demethylated promoters of p16 and hMLH1, genes associated with ionizing radiation response. Prolonged exposure to low-dose AZA resulted in sustained radiosensitivity if associated with persistent genomic hypomethylation after recovery from AZA. Compared with maternal HCT116 cells, DNMT3b-defcient deficient cells were more sensitive to radiation with a SER of 2.0 (CI 0.9-2.1; p = 0.03), and DNMT3b/DNMT1-/- double-deficient cells showed a SER of 1.6 (CI 0.5-2.7; p = 0.09).

CONCLUSIONS

AZA-induced genomic hypomethylation results in enhanced radiation sensitivity in colorectal carcinoma. The mediators leading to sensitization remain unknown. Defining the specific factors associated with radiation sensitization after genomic demethylation may open the way to better targeting for the purpose of radiation sensitization.

Amifostine metabolite WR-1065 disrupts homologous recombination in mammalian cells

Repair of DNA damage through homologous recombination (HR) pathways plays a crucial role in maintaining genome stability. However, overstimulation of HR pathways in response to genotoxic stress may abnormally elevate recombination frequencies, leading to increased mutation rates and delayed genomic instability. Radiation-induced genomic instability has been detected after exposure to both low- and high-linear energy transfer (LET) radiations, but the mechanisms responsible for initiating or propagating genomic instability are not known. We have demonstrated that WR-1065, the active metabolite of amifostine, protects against radiation-induced cell killing and delayed genomic instability. We hypothesize that hyperstimulation of HR pathways plays a mechanistic role in radiation-induced genomic instability and that, in part, WR-1065 exerts it radioprotective effect through suppression of the HR pathway. Results of this study demonstrate that WR-1065 treatment selectively protected against radiation-induced cell killing in HR-proficient cell lines compared to an HR-deficient cell line. Further, WR-1065 treatment decreases HR in response to DNA damage using two different mammalian cell systems. This suppression of hyper-recombination is a previously unrecognized mechanism by which WR-1065 effects radioprotection in mammalian cells.

Interaction of amifostine and ionizing radiation on transcriptional patterns of apoptotic genes expressed in human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC)

PURPOSE

Amifostine is a prodrug that requires dephosphorylation by alkaline phosphatase to become activated. This process occurs rapidly within the bloodstream after its i.v. administration to patients undergoing cancer treatment with selected radiation and chemotherapies. Vascular endothelial cells will, therefore, represent a normal cell system that is among the first to experience the radioprotective effects of this agent. Amifostine's active free thiol WR-1065 was investigated to determine its effect on radiation-induced changes in transcriptional patterns and subsequent apoptosis in human microvascular endothelial cells (HMEC) growing in vitro.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Human microvascular endothelial cells were grown to confluency and then exposed to WR-1065 at a concentration of 4 mM for 30 min, radiation doses that ranged from 0 to 6 Gy, and WR-1065 at a concentration of 4 mM for 30 min before exposure to ionizing radiation. Cell survival was assessed by clonogenic assay, cell cycle phase was analyzed by flow cytometry, apoptosis was also assessed by flow cytometry in which Anexin V staining and sub-G1 fraction analysis were applied, and gene expression was analyzed by the Clontech Atlas Human cDNA array to identify synergistic and antagonistic effects as a function of amifostine and radiation exposure conditions with a focus on apoptotic-related factors.

RESULTS

Exposure of HMEC to 4 mM WR-1065 30 min before irradiation resulted in a protection enhancement factor of 2.0; that is, D(O-IRR) of 1.25 Gy and D(O-IRR+WR) of 2.56 Gy. Expression profiling revealed 29 genes that were synergistically activated by the combined action of WR-1065 and ionizing radiation, and an additional 12 genes were synergistically or additively suppressed. In particular, a subset of apoptosis-related genes that included caspases 2, 4, and 9 and different members of the bcl family, along with apoptosis-related receptors, were identified as being significantly affected by the combined treatment of WR-1065 and radiation exposure. In addition, a number of cell cycle-related genes that express cyclins A, G1, G2, and D3 and DNA damage/check point proteins ATM, DNA-PK and RAD23B were also found to be significantly affected. Functional assays of apoptosis were also performed that demonstrated the ability of WR-1065 to protect against radiation-induced apoptosis.

CONCLUSIONS

WR-1065, the active thiol form of amifostine, is an effective radioprotector of HMEC as determined by use of clonogenic and apoptotic assays for cell survival. Expression profiling successfully defined the transcriptional response of HMEC to both WR-1065 and ionizing radiation exposure, either alone or in combination, and demonstrated both synergistic and antagonistic effects on the expression of different cellular genes, along with corresponding functional responses. The radioprotective effects of amifostine are not limited to its well-characterized physiochemical properties, which include free-radical scavenging, auto-oxidation leading to intracellular hypoxia, and chemical repair by hydrogen atom donation, but include its ability to modulate the complex transcriptional regulation of genes that are involved in apoptosis, cell cycle, and DNA repair.

Antimutagenicity of WR-1065 in L5178Y cells exposed to accelerated (56)Fe ions

The ability of the aminothiol WR-1065 [N-(2-mercaptoethyl)-1,3-diaminopropane] to protect L5178Y (LY) cells against the cytotoxic and mutagenic effects of exposure to accelerated (56)Fe ions (1.08 GeV/nucleon) was determined. It was found that while WR-1065 reduced the mutagenicity in both cell lines when it was present during the irradiation, the addition of WR-1065 after the exposure had no effect on the mutagenicity of the radiation in either cell line. No marked protection against the cytotoxic effects of exposure to (56)Fe ions was provided by WR-1065 when added either during or after irradiation in either cell line. We reported previously that WR-1065 protected the LY-S1 and LY-SR1 cell lines against both the cytotoxicity and mutagenicity of X radiation when present during exposure, but that its protection when administered after exposure was limited to the mutagenic effects in the radiation-hypersensitive cell line, LY-S1. The results indicate that the mechanisms involved differ in the protection against cytotoxic compared to mutagenic effects and in the protection against damage caused by accelerated (56)Fe ions compared to X radiation.

Biological factors influencing the RBE of neutrons: implications for their past, present and future use in radiotherapy

The recent resurgence of interest in fast-neutron therapy, particularly for the treatment of prostate cancer, warrants a review of the original radiobiological basis for this modality and the evolution of these concepts that resulted from subsequent experimentation with the fast-neutron beams used for randomized clinical trials. It is clear from current radiobiological knowledge that some of the postulates that formed the mechanistic basis for past clinical trials were incorrect. Such discrepancies, along with the inherent physical disadvantages of neutron beams in terms of collimation and intensity modulation, may partially account for the lack of therapeutic benefit observed in many randomized clinical trials. Moreover, it is equally apparent that indiscriminate prescription of fast-neutron therapy is likely to lead to an adverse clinical outcome in a proportion of patients. Hence any renewed efforts to establish a niche for this modality in clinical radiation oncology will necessitate the development of a triage system that can discriminate those patients who might benefit from fast-neutron therapy from those who might be harmed by it. In the future, fast-neutron therapy might be prescribed based upon the relative status of appropriate molecular parameters that have a differential impact upon radiosensitivity to photons compared to fast neutrons.

Protection of human tumor cells of differing radiosensitivity by WR-1065

We examined the ability of WR-1065, the biologically active aminothiol form of the clinically used drug amifostine (WR-2721, Ethyol), to protect cultures of two human glioblastoma cell lines of greatly differing radiosensitivity from the cytotoxic effects of gamma radiation. M059J cells are extremely radiosensitive compared to M059K cells (which were derived from the same tumor) and are defective in the DNA-dependent protein kinase (DNAPK)-mediated pathway for the repair of DSBs. In spite of their marked phenotypic differences, the two glioblastoma lines were protected equivalently ( approximately 1.8-fold) after a 30-min preirradiation treatment with 4 mM WR-1065. These findings are in agreement with earlier studies that showed no relationship between the ability of another aminothiol, cysteamine, to protect human tumor cells with differing abilities to repair DSBs and/or radiosensitivity. Thus it appears that differences in intrinsic radiosensitivity and ability to repair DSBs are not important general factors in the modulation of the radiosensitivity of human cells by aminothiols. Because of a previous report that the radiosensitive mutant rodent xrs5 cell line (which, like M059J, is defective in the DNAPK-mediated pathway for repairing DSBs) is unusually refractory to the radioprotective effects of WR-1065, we re-examined the ability of WR-1065 to protect these cells. In contrast to the earlier studies, both the wild-type and mutant rodent lines were protected extensively by WR-1065. This discrepancy might be related to some unknown factor, such as differences in chromatin organization among xrs5 subclones that arise during their karyotypic evolution, possibly leading to altered DNA-drug associations.