Treatment of stage I testis seminoma by radiotherapy: long-term results--a 30-year experience

Long-Term Results in Patients Affected by Testicular Seminoma Treated with Radiotherapy: Risk of Second Malignancies

Aims

To report clinical results in patients with testicular seminoma treated with postoperative radiotherapy with regard to survival, acute and late toxicity, and risk of second malignancy.

Materials and methods

176 stage I-II testicular seminoma patients treated with radiotherapy from 1964 to 1994 at the Radiotherapy Division of Pisa University, using 60Co or Linac, were analyzed retrospectively. The follow-up ranged from 0.13 to 32.37 years, with a median of 12.1 years. The observed numbers of second malignancies were compared with those expected, taking into account age, sex, and incidence rates from the Tuscany Tumor Registry.

Results

Overall and specific survival at 10-15 years were 89-82% and 93-92%, respectively. Multivariate analysis revealed a significantly better survival in patients younger than 50 years and in those treated with Linac. Severe late sequelae occurred in 8% of the patients. Sixteen second malignancies were observed (14 solid tumors and 2 leukemias); median latency was 13 years (range, 3-27) and the observed/expected ratio 1.4 ( P not significant). Solid cancers were localized in the bladder (2), kidney (2), skin (2), stomach (1), prostate (1), lung (1), larynx (1), uvea (1) and contralateral testicle (1); 1 patient presented an intestinal carcinoid and 1 a metastasis from an unknown primary. The risk of a second malignancy was higher in the patient group receiving less than 4000 cGy (observed/expected, 2.8; P = 0.015).

Conclusions

The study confirmed the high cure rate in stage III seminomas after postoperative radiotherapy. Incidence of a second malignancy was higher than expected, but the difference was not statistically significant.

Stage I Seminoma of the Testis: Long Term Results and Toxicity with Adjuvant Radiotherapy

Aims and background

Pure testicular seminoma has historically been treated with post-orchidectomy radiation therapy with excellent results. Recently, several aspects of the treatment of stage I seminoma have been questioned. We assessed long-term results and toxicity of patients with pure testicular seminoma treated at the Department of Radiation Oncology of S. Chiara Hospital, Trento.

Methods

From 1953 to 1987, 102 patients with stage I pure testicular seminoma were given megavoltage irradiation with curative intent. All patients had a minimum follow-up of 3 years (maximum 37 years, median 13 years). They received a mean para-aortic/pelvic dose of 33.07 Gy (range 23.70-45.20 Gy) with different doses and fields reflecting the change in techniques over a long period of time.

Results

The cause-specific actuarial survival at 30 years was 99% and crude survival 67%. One patient had an out-field relapse (inguinal) after a few months and was cured with radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Another patient relapsed with widespared metastases and died after 1 year of progressive disease. Early toxycity was mild and the treatment was well tolerated. Late side effects were reported in 8/102 patients.

Conclusion

In our series adjuvant radiation therapy resulted in cure rates corresponding to those reported in the literature. The 30-year actuarial survival of 99% was extremely good and the toxicity of the treatment was mild. Post-orchidectomy radiation to the para-aortic and ipsilateral pelvic nodes is a safe and effective method of preventing recurrences and is currently to be considered the treatment of choice in stage I testicular seminoma.

Management of Low-Stage Testicular Seminoma

Management of testicular seminoma has benefited from numerous advances in imaging, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy over the last 50 years leading to nearly 100% disease-specific survival for low-stage seminoma. This article examines the evaluation and management of low-stage testicular seminoma, which includes clinical stage I and IIA disease. Excellent outcomes for stage I seminoma are achieved with active surveillance, adjuvant radiotherapy, and adjuvant single-agent carboplatin. Current areas of research focus on optimizing surveillance regimens and minimizing the morbidity and long-term complications of adjuvant treatment. Radiotherapy continues to be the primary treatment option for patients with clinical stage IIa disease.

Adjuvant radiotherapy for synchronous bilateral testicular seminoma: a case report and a review of the pertinent literature

Few cases of synchronous bilateral stage I seminomas have been reported in the world literature. We present a case of bilateral synchronous testicular seminoma, the current literature on the management of stage I seminoma, and the implications for radiotherapy. A forty-year-old man presented with synchronous bilateral classical seminomas, both stage IA. After undergoing bilateral inguinal orchiectomy, he received adjuvant external beam radiotherapy, with a standard paraaortic field. After 18 months of followup, he remains well, without evidence of recurrence. Bilateral germ cell tumors (BGCTs) are reported consistently at a low rate. Bilateral radical inguinal orchiectomy is standard of care, yet some groups have proposed an organ preservation approach. Of the reported cases of bilateral stage I synchronous GCT, with concordant seminoma histology, most of them were treated with bilateral orchiectomy and adjuvant radiotherapy. Although morbidity associated with radiotherapy directed at the abdomen is not negligible, adjuvant paraaortic radiotherapy remains safe and well-tolerated treatment regime. Bilateral synchronous stage I seminoma of the testes is rare. Organ preservation remains investigational. Chemotherapy is probably a reasonable option. We propose that patients with bilateral stage I synchronous GCT, with concordant seminoma histology, should be managed with bilateral orchiectomy, followed by paraaortic radiotherapy.

[Stage 1 testicular seminoma]

Testicular cancer is rare, representing only 1 % of malignant tumors, but the most common cancer in young men, 15 to 35 years. Adjuvant radiotherapy after orchidectomy in testicular seminoma stage I, reduces risk of relapse. It aims to eradicate micro-metastatic disease in lymph drainage territories. In the case of adjuvant radiotherapy, the relapse-free survival of 96 % with an overall survival of 98 % at 5 years. The irradiation volume is made up of lymph nodes paraaortic which it is possible to add the ipsilateral renal hilum to the testicular lesion. The current recommended dose is 20 Gy in 10 fractions and 2 weeks, usually delivered by two antero-posterior beams. The acute toxicities, mainly represented by nausea and diarrhea are usually quickly resolved to the end of irradiation. Regarding toxicities long-term, preservation of semen should be considered after surgery because of fear of infertility post-treatment. The risk of second cancer associated with exposure to ionizing radiation, albeit small, is especially important to consider these patients to significant life expectancy. Nevertheless, developments in radiotherapy techniques and lower doses and irradiated volumes can probably reduce this risk further.

Management options for stage I seminoma

Stage I seminoma is the most common clinical scenario among patients with testicular cancer. Following orchiectomy, various treatment alternatives (adjuvant radiotherapy, surveillance, chemotherapy) can be offered that yield similar efficacy results and definitive cure is the rule. However, there is no consensus on the optimal management choice and considerable debate has been raised in recent years. The pros and the cons associated with each therapy, as well as their long-term outcomes are discussed in this review. Overall burden of treatment needed, therapy-related morbidity, economic costs, quality of life issues and patient preferences should all be considered. Refinement in the knowledge of predictive factors for relapse and mounting experience with both surveillance and adjuvant chemotherapy have led to consideration of risk-adapted treatment strategies as an alternative to standard radiotherapy. Although this model needs to be improved and validated, active close surveillance for low-risk patients and adjuvant therapy for those uncompliant or at higher risk of relapse seem to be acceptable options for patients with stage I seminoma.

[Stage I seminoma and radiotherapy: to bury it or not?]

Postorchidectomy management of stage I testis seminoma has evolved for many years. Three treatment options should be discussed after surgery. Surveillance tends toward taking a more significant place to avoid overtreatment, adjuvant chemotherapy with carboplatin has demonstrated its efficiency, and for some, preventive radiotherapy, the historical reference treatment, is losing momentum. Whatever the chosen orientation, long-term prognosis is excellent with overall survival closed to 100%. In this context, this review underlines the advantages and the drawbacks of the three attitudes but also the unknowns relative to each. Indeed, their knowledge is crucial for informing clearly and with an objective way. Without gold-standard, but with three therapeutic options available, informing our patients is the key so they make an informed choice in dialogue with the oncologist.

Management of Low-Stage Testicular Seminoma

Testicular seminoma represents a modern model of a multidisciplinary approach to a curable neoplasm. Surgeons, radiation oncologists, and medical oncologists play an important role in disease detection, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up. This article focuses on the management of men who have early-stage seminoma, which represents stage I and IIa (minimal retroperitoneal spread). In stage I disease, the major controversies continue to revolve around surveillance versus adjuvant treatment and more recently adjuvant radiotherapy or carboplatin-based chemotherapy. Focus on long-term complications, such as cardiovascular disease, gastrointestinal disease, and secondary cancers, has led to the concept of increased surveillance with therapy for those who relapse. Radiation therapy remains the mainstay of therapy for patients who have stage IIa disease.

Controversies in the Management of Clinical Stage I Testis Cancer

During the last two decades, definitive primary treatments and surveillance with definitive treatment deferred until relapse have demonstrated 98% to 99% cure rates in patients with stage I testis cancer, and these options have obtained firm positions in standard management. The development of optimal management strategies in various countries were at least partly guided by available surgical expertise in retroperitoneal lymph node dissection in the United States, and easy access to reference hospitals in densely populated countries in Western Europe that facilitated close surveillance programs; hence, treatment preferences differ on the two sides of the Atlantic. The success of both approaches is highly dependent on the skills of the practitioner, particularly of surgery and of scrutinized surveillance. As a result, local expertise and familiarity with a chosen modality has strengthened over the years, and investigators have been reluctant to embark on randomized trials designed to compare one modality with another. Such expertise with one particular technique, with the other approach being less familiar territory, has created controversy, because both physicians and patients seek evidence-based data coming from randomized clinical trials on which to make management decisions. Moreover, the reduced risk of relapse resulting from the use of radiotherapy or carboplatin in stage I seminoma and of cisplatin-based chemotherapy in stage I nonseminoma must be balanced against the potential long-term adverse effects in this population of patients with a normal life expectancy. The purpose of this review is to present the currently available data and discuss the merits and the disadvantages of the various approaches, yielding to the possible conclusion that all options appear to be equal in terms of efficacy, but that modality-associated adverse effects differ.

Pelvic recurrence in stage I seminoma: A new phenomenon that questions modern protocols for radiotherapy and follow-up

OBJECTIVE

To highlight the increased risk for pelvic relapse in patients with stage 1 seminoma treated with adjuvant radiotherapy limited to para-aortic template alone.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Over a four-year period, three patients presented with early pelvic recurrence after radical orchidectomy and adjuvant irradiation for stage 1 seminoma. In each case, radiotherapy had been limited to the para-aortic region with omission of the ipsilateral hemi pelvis.

RESULTS

Pelvic recurrences occurred on the ipsilateral tumor side. Durable complete remission was achieved in each case; however, treatment was complex and there was associated morbidity.

CONCLUSION

This significant incidence of pelvic recurrence questions the validity of modern radiotherapy protocol which excludes the ipsilateral pelvis from the radiation field.

Randomized Trial of 30 Versus 20 Gy in the Adjuvant Treatment of Stage I Testicular Seminoma: A Report on Medical Research Council Trial TE18, European Organisation for the Research and Treatment of Cancer Trial 30942 (ISRCTN18525328)

Purpose

To assess the possibility of reducing radiotherapy doses without compromising efficacy in the management of patients with stage I seminoma.

Patients and Methods

Patients were randomly assigned 20 Gy/10 fractions over 2 weeks or 30 Gy/15 fractions during 3 weeks after orchidectomy. They completed a symptom diary card during treatment and quality-of-life forms pre- and post-treatment. The trial was powered to exclude absolute differences in 2-year relapse rates of 3% to 4% (α = .05 [one sided]; 90% power).

Results

From 1995 to 1998, 625 patients were randomly assigned to treatment. Four weeks after starting radiotherapy, significantly more patients receiving 30 Gy reported moderate or severe lethargy (20% v 5%) and an inability to carry out their normal work (46% v 28%). However, by 12 weeks, levels in both groups were similar. With a median follow-up of 61 months, 10 and 11 relapses, respectively, have been reported in the 30- and 20-Gy groups (hazard ratio, 1.11; 90% CI, 0.54 to 2.28). The absolute difference in 2-year relapse rates is 0.7%; the lower 90% confidence limit is 2.9%. Only one patient has died from seminoma (allocated to the 20-Gy treatment group).

Conclusion

Treatment with 20 Gy in 10 fractions is unlikely to produce relapse rates more than 3% higher than for standard 30 Gy radiation therapy, and data on an additional 469 patients randomly assigned in a subsequent trial support and strengthen these results. Reductions in morbidity enable patients to return to work more rapidly. Prolonged follow-up is required before any inference can be made about any impact of allocated treatment on new primary cancer diagnoses.

[Radiotherapy in stage I testicular seminoma: retrospective study and review of literature]

INTRODUCTION

Seminoma accounts for about 40% of germ cell tumours of the testicle. In this retrospective analysis, we review literature concerning management of stage I seminoma.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Between March 1987 and April 2001, 65 patients with stage I pure testicular seminoma received adjuvant radiotherapy with a 25 MV linear accelerator.

RESULTS

Median age was 33 years. Testicular tumour has been found on the right testis in 39 patients and on the left one in 24 patients. Patients have been treated using an anterior-posterior parallel pair and have received 20-25 Gy in 10-14 fractions. The target volume consisted of paraaortic, and paraaortic + homolateral iliac lymph nodes in 17 and 46 patients, respectively. Acute toxicity was mainly digestive, 38% of patients presenting nausea and vomiting. Median follow-up time was 37 months. All patients are alive in complete remission.

DISCUSSION

Because of good radio-sensitivity of seminoma, radiotherapy is regarded as standard adjuvant treatment (5 years relapse rate: 3-5%). Acute toxicity is dominated by moderate gastro-intestinal side effects. Secondary neoplasia represents one of the worst possible long-term complications of therapy. Waiting for ongoing randomised trials, the modern literature for seminoma reflects a trend toward lower radiation doses (20-25 Gy) and smaller treatment volumes (paraaortic field). Adjuvant chemotherapy with two courses of carboplatin, might be equivalent to radiotherapy but must be investigated in randomised trials. A surveillance policy is one of the other management options less recommended.

Mortality after cure of testicular seminoma

PURPOSE

To determine the incidence of potentially treatment-related mortality in long-term survivors of testicular seminoma treated by orchiectomy and radiation therapy (XRT).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

From all 477 men with stage I or II testicular seminoma treated at The University of Texas M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) with post-orchiectomy megavoltage XRT between 1951 and 1999, 453 never sustained relapse of their disease. Long-term survival for these 453 men was evaluated with the person-years method to determine the standardized mortality ratio (SMR). SMRs were calculated for all causes of death, cardiac deaths, and cancer deaths using standard US data for males.

RESULTS

After a median follow-up of 13.3 years, the 10-, 20-, 30-, and 40-year actuarial survival rates were 93%, 79%, 59%, and 26%, respectively. The all-cause SMR over the entire observation interval was 1.59 (99% CI, 1.21 to 2.04). The SMR was not excessive for the first 15 years of follow-up: SMR, 1.30 (95% CI, 0.93 to 1.77); but beyond 15 years the SMR was 1.85 (99% CI, 1.30 to 2.55). The overall cardiac-specific SMR was 1.61 (95% CI, 1.21 to 2.24). The cardiac SMR was significantly elevated only beyond 15 years (P <.01). The overall cancer-specific SMR was 1.91 (99% CI, 1.14 to 2.98). The cancer SMR was also significant only after 15 years of follow-up (P <.01). An increased mortality was evident in patients treated with and without mediastinal XRT.

CONCLUSION

Long-term survivors of seminoma treated with post-orchiectomy XRT are at significant excess risk of death as a result of cardiac disease or second cancer. Management strategies that minimize these risks but maintain the excellent hitherto observed cure rates need to be actively pursued.

Late recurrence in 1263 men with testicular germ cell tumors. Multivariate analysis of risk factors and implications for management

BACKGROUND

Testicular germ cell tumors are highly curable. However, 10-30% of patients have recurrence after initial treatment. The time-course of recurrence has implications for the duration of follow-up. This study was undertaken to assess the risk and time-course of recurrence and to identify patients at higher risk of late recurrence.

METHODS

The records of 1263 patients with primary testicular germ cell tumors presenting to the Royal Marsden Hospital between December 1979 and December 1993 were reviewed. In all, 255 episodes of recurrence were documented (including 44 patients with multiple recurrences) and used to calculate recurrence-free survivals.

RESULTS

Fifty-three patients (15 seminomas; 38 nonseminomatous germ cell tumors [NSGCT]) had recurrence more than 2 years after initial presentation. A multivariate analysis of risk of recurrence after 2 years identified positive markers at presentation and the presence of differentiated teratomas in postchemotherapy surgical specimens as significant predictors. Very late recurrence (> 5 years) occurred mainly in patients with metastatic NSGCT (12 of 14 patients) with a 1% annual risk of recurrence between 5 and 10 years. Very late recurrence was also seen in one case of metastatic seminoma and one case of Stage I NSGCT managed by surveillance. Most late recurrences (n = 9) were detected at routine annual follow-up visits but five had recurrences with symptoms leading to an unscheduled clinic visit.

CONCLUSION

Late recurrences are rare in patients with testicular germ cell tumors and follow-up to detect recurrence may not be needed after 5 years, except in those presenting with metastatic NSGCTs.

Treatment outcome, body image, and sexual functioning after orchiectomy and radiotherapy for Stage I-II testicular seminoma

PURPOSE

Orchiectomy followed by infradiaphragmatic irradiation is the standard treatment for Stage I-II testicular seminoma in The Netherlands. Because body image and sexual functioning can be affected by treatment, a retrospective study was carried out to assess treatment outcome, body image, and changes in sexuality after orchiectomy and radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The medical charts of 166 patients with Stage I-II testicular seminoma were reviewed. A questionnaire on body image and current sexual functioning regarding the frequency and quality of erections, sexual activity, significance of sex, and changes in sexuality was sent to 157 patients (at a mean of 51 months after treatment).

RESULTS

Seventy-eight percent (n = 123, mean age 42 years) completed the questionnaire. During irradiation, almost half of patients experienced nausea and 19% nausea and vomiting. Only 3 patients had disease relapse. After treatment, about 20% reported less interest and pleasure in sex and less sexual activity. Interest in sex, erectile difficulties, and satisfaction with sexual life did not differ from age-matched healthy controls. At the time of the survey, 17% of patients had erectile difficulties, a figure that was significantly higher than before treatment, but which correlated also with age. Twenty percent expressed concerns about fertility, and 52% found their body had changed after treatment. Cancer treatment had negatively influenced sexual life in 32% of the patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Orchiectomy with radiotherapy is an effective and well-tolerated treatment for Stage I-II testicular seminoma. Treatment-induced changes in body image and concerns about fertility were detected, but the sexual problems encountered did not seem to differ from those of healthy controls, although baseline data are lacking.

Radiotherapy for early stages testicular seminoma: patterns of care study in Germany

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate compliance of radiotherapeutic departments with 1997 German consensus guidelines for staging and treatment of testicular cancer patients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A questionnaire was mailed to all departments of radiotherapy in Germany as identified by the data-base of the German Society for Radiation Oncology (DEGRO). The questionnaire was analysed with particular respect to institutional characteristics, frequency of seminoma patients treated per year, treatment techniques, and institutional compliance with consensus guidelines.

RESULTS

Fifty-six institutions (39%) returned the questionnaire, 46% of which fully complied with consensus guidelines concerning staging requirements. A minimum workup with computed tomography (CT) of abdomen and pelvis, X-ray or CT of the chest and tumour markers was mandatory in 87.5% of the departments. Compliance with the recommended treatment schedule was high in stage I with less than 5% major violations of recommended dose prescription or target volume definition. In stage IIA/B, however, 22.6 and 10.2% of the departments showed major deviations from either standardised treatment target volumes or total doses of irradiation, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Compliance with consensus recommendations in German departments for radiotherapy is satisfactory in many institutions. However, major deviations from treatment guidelines were observed in stage II disease indicating the need for continuous improvement in the quality of testicular cancer patient management.

Patterns of relapse following radiotherapy for stage I seminoma of the testis: implications for follow-up

A retrospective review was undertaken of 409 consecutive patients treated with adjuvant radiotherapy for Stage I seminoma between 1988 and 1997. A total of 339 men were treated to a volume encompassing the para-aortic nodes and 70 were treated with extended field radiotherapy. The patients were followed up within oncology clinics adhering to a standard protocol of clinical examination, chest radiography and measurement of serum marker levels. No routine computed tomographic (CT) scans were carried out. At a median follow-up of 57 months, 13 patients have relapsed, giving a recurrence-free rate of 97.2% at 3 years and 96.8% at 5 years. Of these, eight (62%) were detected at routine appointments and five (38%) requested early appointments. Chest radiography (2/5) and serum marker levels (3/5) identified disease in asymptomatic patients. Eight patients (62%) had raised markers at relapse, including two with normal serum markers at original presentation. The median size of pelvic node recurrences in the para-aortic-treated group was 7.3 cm (2.8-13 cm). Four patients have developed second testicular primaries: three were detected at routine appointments and one patient had requested an early appointment. We conclude that regular follow-up with serum marker estimations and chest radiography is sufficient to detect recurrence at an early stage and that our policy of no routine CT scanning has been shown to give acceptable results.

Radiotherapy for stage II testicular seminoma

PURPOSE

To compare the outcome of patients with Stage II seminoma treated with prophylactic mediastinal irradiation, without any supradiaphragmatic irradiation, and with prophylactic left supraclavicular irradiation (PLSCI).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1960 and 1999, 73 men with Stage II seminoma received postorchiectomy radiotherapy. Before 1984, 36 received prophylactic mediastinal irradiation (Series I); between 1984 and 1992, 17 received no supradiaphragmatic irradiation (Series II); and after 1992, 20 received PLSCI (Series III). The outcomes in these series were compared.

RESULTS

The abdominal tumor sizes were as follows: Series I, <or=2 cm, n = 4; >2 and <or=5 cm, n = 12; >5 and <or=10 cm, n = 16; Series II, <or=2 cm, n = 1; >2 and <or=5 cm, n = 12; >5 and <or=10 cm, n = 4; and Series III, <or=2 cm, n = 1; >2 and <or=5 cm, n = 14; >5 and <or=10 cm, n = 5 (p = 0.75). The median duration of follow-up was 14.4, 9.3, and 4.5 years for Series I, II, and III, respectively. The 6-year freedom from relapse was 94%, 71%, and 95% for Series I, II, and III, respectively. The differences between Series I and II (p = 0.014) and between II and III (p = 0.042) were significant. Three patients in Series II had a relapse in their left supraclavicular fossa-a failure pattern abrogated by PLSCI.

CONCLUSIONS

PLSCI significantly diminishes the likelihood of relapse for Stage IIA, IIB, and IIC seminoma (mass <or=10 cm).

The location of contralateral breast cancers after radiation therapy

Radiation therapy following conservative surgery results in scattered radiation to the contralateral breast, with higher doses to the medial breast and lower doses laterally. The purpose of the current study is to determine whether the location of contralateral breast cancers developing following breast conserving surgery and radiation is indicative of radiation-induced malignancies. The charts of 1,755 patients treated with conservative surgery and radiation therapy between 1970 and 1998 were reviewed. Fifty-nine patients who developed a contralateral malignancy following conservative surgery and radiation therapy and who had complete information and documentation of the location of the second lesion served as the primary focus of the current study. The location of the contralateral malignancy was compared with the location of the primary tumors of the overall patient population. The location of breast cancers developing in the contralateral breast following breast conserving therapy and radiation was not consistent with radiation-induced malignancies. Specifically, there was not a preponderance of medially located tumors in patients developing contralateral breast cancers following radiation. There was a slight excess of central lesions that cannot be explained by higher doses of radiation. The location of breast cancers in the contralateral breast following conservative surgery and radiation is not indicative of radiation-induced lesions. These data should be reassuring to women considering breast conserving surgery and radiation.

Surveillance for stage I testicular seminoma. a review

There is good evidence that patients with stage I seminoma can be managed equally well after orchidectomy with surveillance and adjuvant retroperitoneal radiation therapy. There is considerable reluctance amongst many physicians to accept surveillance as a management option in stage I seminoma and this is largely based on the excellent results achieved with adjuvant retroperiteonal radiation for many years. However, patients with stage I seminoma have a long life span and it is possible that the long-term sequelae of radiation treatment could have a negative impact on quality of life and longevity. It is of utmost importance to continue the study of the long-term effects of all current treatment approaches, in particular the risk of induction of second malignancies. However, the psychosocial impact on patients of surveillance and other management strategies must also be assessed. Stage I testicular seminoma is highly curable with currently available management approaches and the current challenge for clinicians is to maintain these excellent results while minimizing toxicity and individualising treatment to the specific social, economic and emotional circumstances of each patient. Surveillance should be one of the management options offered to patients with stage I seminoma.

Quality of life after radiotherapy for early-stage testicular seminoma

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Standard therapy in early-stage testicular seminoma (TS) includes inguinal orchiectomy followed by irradiation (XRT) of the pelvic and para-aortic nodes. Since this treatment is highly effective in controlling the disease and leads to many long survivors, the quality of life (QL) may be impaired by treatment-induced side-effects. The aim of this study was to provide a QL evaluation of patients treated with XRT after orchiectomy for TS.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We used a validated self-completed questionnaire based on a series of 44 items covering all QL fields. The items were grouped into six subscales with standardized scores. The questionnaire was mailed to a consecutive series of 143 patients treated between 1961 and 1995 for TS with no evidence of disease after primary treatment.

RESULTS

Ninety-eight questionnaires (68.5%) were returned and are assessable. The median age of the patients was 48 years (range, 26-85 years) at the time of completing the questionnaire, with a median follow-up after completion of treatment of 123 months (range, 15-432 months). The physical and autonomy subscale standardized scores were > or =1 in 83 and 95% of the cases, respectively. Psychological problems were reported by a small percentage of patients, ranging from 13, who reported a depressive condition, to 16%, who declared feeling tense. Of the patients, 86 and 89% have regularly met relatives and friends. The urinary score was above the central point in 99% of the patients. Only 6% of the patients perceived their body image as worsened by treatment. The patients who were more informed about the disease and therapy had a better physical and psychological adjustment.

CONCLUSIONS

The QL in our patients resulted as satisfactory, with a maintained body image and few side-effects. The information given to the patients about their disease and its treatment influenced the post-treatment QL adjustment.

The effect of radiotherapy treatment changes on sites of relapse in stage I testicular seminoma

AIM

To evaluate relapse patterns in stage I testicular seminoma related to changes in radiotherapy practice.

METHOD

Four hundred and six patients with stage I testicular seminoma were treated with adjuvant radiotherapy following orchidectomy: 338 patients received para-aortic radiotherapy only and 68 patients with added risk factors had radiotherapy extended to include the pelvis. Computed tomograms of relapsed patients were reviewed and sites of relapse were documented with correlation to the radiotherapy field.

RESULTS

Thirteen relapses were identified; 10 occurring in the para-aortic radiotherapy group (3.0% relapse rate) and three in the extended radiotherapy field group (4.4% relapse rate). Sites of relapse were; five pelvis, three mediastinum, one lung, one scapula, one scrotum, while one patient had multiple relapse sites including the pelvis and one had a tumour marker relapse with no site identified. All the pelvic relapses occurred in the para-aortic radiotherapy group.

CONCLUSION

Pelvic relapse only occurred when radiotherapy had been confined to the para-aortic region. Since para-aortic radiotherapy achieves equivalent outcome to wider field radiotherapy with reduced toxicity, it is likely to become standard practice in stage I seminoma and pelvic relapses will therefore increase in frequency. It is therefore important to include pelvic imaging when relapse is suspected.

Recurrence of germ cell tumor after orchiectomy

OBJECTIVES

To assess the characteristics of patients with recurrent disease by a retrospective analysis.

METHODS

Between 1982 and 1998, 488 patients were treated in Nijmegen for testicular cancer. All patients underwent orchiectomy and adjuvant treatment when indicated. Patients were routinely followed up.

RESULTS

In 36 patients (7.4%), disease recurrence was found during follow-up; 12 had contralateral disease and 24 systemic recurrence. Contralateral testicular cancer occurred a median of 63.8 months (range 43.2 to 165.2) after orchiectomy and systemic recurrence at a median of 6.1 months (range 1.5 to 94.4). Contralateral testicular cancer was more frequent in patients with pure seminoma (odds ratio 4.3, 95% confidence interval 1.4 to 13.1); 8 of 9 patients with contralateral cancer received adjuvant radiotherapy. The best predictor of systemic recurrence after nonseminoma germ cell tumor was the presence of teratoma and embryonal cell components in the primary tumor. In the entire population, 19 patients (3.9%) died of the disease. None of the patients with contralateral testicular recurrence or systemic recurrence after Stage I seminoma died of the disease. One of 10 patients died of recurrent Stage I nonseminoma germ cell tumor. The chance of dying of recurrence after metastatic nonseminoma germ cell tumor was 36%.

CONCLUSIONS

Recurrence after an initially complete response is rare in testicular cancer. Contralateral testicular cancer is associated with the presence of seminoma components in the primary tumor and occurs almost 10 times later than systemic recurrence. The prognosis after contralateral testicular cancer and after recurrence in Stage I seminoma is good.

Second malignancies after treatment of early-stage breast cancer: lumpectomy and radiation therapy versus mastectomy

PURPOSE

To determine the risk of second malignancies after lumpectomy and radiation therapy (LRT), and to compare it with that in a similar cohort of early-stage breast cancer patients undergoing mastectomy without radiation (MAST).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between January 1970 and December 1990, 1,029 breast cancer patients at our institution underwent LRT. A cohort of 1,387 breast cancer patients who underwent surgical treatment by mastectomy (MAST), and who did not receive postoperative radiation during the same time period, served as a comparison group. Second malignancies were categorized as contralateral breast versus nonbreast. In the cohort of patients undergoing LRT, a detailed analysis was carried out with respect to age, disease stage, smoking history, radiation therapy technique, dose, the use of chemotherapy or hormone therapy, and other clinical and/or pathologic characteristics.

RESULTS

As of March 1999, the median follow-up was 14.6 years for the LRT group and 16 years for the MAST group. The 15-year risk of any second malignancy was nearly identical for both cohorts (17.5% v 19%, respectively). The second breast malignancy rate at 15 years was 10% for both the MAST and LRT groups. The 15-year risk of a second nonbreast malignancy was 11% for the LRT and 10% for the MAST group. In the subset of patients 45 years of age or younger at the time of treatment, the second breast and nonbreast malignancy rates at 15 years were 10% and 5% for patients undergoing LRT versus 7% and 4% for patients undergoing mastectomy (P, not statistically significant). In the detailed analysis of LRT patients, second lung malignancies were associated with a history of tobacco use. There were fewer contralateral breast tumors in patients undergoing adjuvant hormone therapy, although this did not reach statistical significance. The adjuvant use of chemotherapy did not significantly affect the risk of second malignancies.

CONCLUSION

There seems to be no increased risk of second malignancies in patients undergoing LRT using modern techniques, compared with MAST. Continued monitoring of these patient cohorts will be required in order to document that these findings are maintained with even longer follow-up periods. With nearly 15 years median follow-up periods, however, these data should be reassuring to women who are considering LRT as a treatment option.

Optimal planning target volume for stage I testicular seminoma: A Medical Research Council randomized trial. Medical Research Council Testicular Tumor Working Group

PURPOSE

To compare relapse rates and toxicity associated with para-aortic (PA) strip or PA and ipsilateral iliac lymph node irradiation (dogleg [DL] field) (30 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks) for stage I testicular seminoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between July 1989 and May 1993, 478 men with testicular seminoma stage I (T1 to T3; no ipsilateral inguinoscrotal operation before orchiectomy) were randomized (PA, 236 patients; DL, 242 patients).

RESULTS

Median follow-up time is 4.5 years. Eighteen relapses, nine in each treatment group, have occurred 4 to 35 months after radiotherapy; among these, four were pelvic relapses, all occurring after PA radiotherapy. However, the 95% confidence interval (CI) for the difference in pelvic relapse rates excludes differences of more than 4%. The 3-year relapse-free survival was 96% (95% CI, 94% to 99%) after PA radiotherapy and 96.6% (95% CI, 94% to 99%) after DL (difference, 0.6%; 95% confidence limits, -3.4%, +4.6%). One patient (PA field) has died from seminoma. Survival at 3 years was 99.3% for PA and 100% for DL radiotherapy. Acute toxicity (nausea, vomiting, leukopenia) was less frequent and less pronounced in patients in the PA arm. Within the first 18 months of follow-up, the sperm counts were significantly higher after PA than after DL irradiation.

CONCLUSION

In patients with testicular seminoma stage I (T1 to T3) and with undisturbed lymphatic drainage, adjuvant radiotherapy confined to the PA lymph nodes is associated with reduced hematologic, gastrointestinal, and gonadal toxicity, but with a higher risk of pelvic recurrence, compared with DL radiotherapy. The recurrence rate is low with either treatment. PA radiotherapy is recommended as standard treatment in these patients.

Postoperative radiotherapy for Stage I/II seminoma: results for 212 patients

PURPOSE

A retrospective review of patients with Stage I and II seminoma treated at a regional cancer center was performed to assess the long term efficacy and toxicity associated with post operative radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1950 and 1995, 212 patients seen at the London Regional Cancer Centre received adjuvant radiotherapy following orchiectomy for Stage I (169) and II (43) seminoma. Median follow-up for the group was 7.5 years.

RESULTS

Progression free, cause specific, and overall survival were 95%, 98%, and 95% at 5 years, and 94%, 98%, and 94% at 10 years respectively. An increased risk of failure was noted among patients with bulky Stage II disease. No other prognostic factors for relapse were identified. Late toxicity was uncommon with only 12/212 (6%) developing any late GI toxicity potentially attributable to radiotherapy. The incidence of second malignancies (excluding second testicular tumors) was 6/212 (actuarial:1%, 1%, 6% at 5,10,15 years respectively). There was a trend toward increased acute complications for patients treated with larger volumes of radiation. No prognostic factors associated with increased risk of late toxicity or second malignancy were identified, likely a consequence of the small number of these events.

CONCLUSION

Survival and toxicity were comparable to that reported in the literature. Post-operative radiotherapy remains a safe and efficacious adjuvant treatment for Stage I and early Stage II seminoma.

The management of stage I testis cancer

For clinical stage I seminoma, conventional management consists of adjuvant RT after orchiectomy. Only 5% of patients relapse. The majority can be salvaged by chemotherapy. The overall survival of 98% is excellent. Seminoma is radiosensitive. A lower dose of RT is required than for NSGCT. Standard therapy presently is 30 Gy in 3 weeks, as suggested by the MRC study. RT is generally well tolerated. There have been recent concerns about second malignancies after 10 to 15 years. Surveillance studies have shown that 18% of patients relapse, the majority in para-aortic lymph nodes. About 15% require salvage RT and 5% salvage chemotherapy. Second relapses are seen in patients treated with RT at first relapse, and occur outside of the radiation field. The main advantage of surveillance is that 80% of patients can be spared slightly toxic overtreatment. The main disadvantage is the need for long-term follow-up, which is expensive and stressful to the patient. Good patient compliance, mandatory to an observation policy, is often difficult on a long-term basis. Seminoma is clearly responsive to chemotherapy. Adjuvant carboplatin in clinical stage I has only been evaluated in two studies. Because reliable prognostic factors have not been established, a high-risk group cannot be identified, and chemotherapy must be given to all patients. Whether or not one cycle of chemotherapy is sufficient requires further confirmation, particularly in view of the results with carboplatin as compared with cisplatin in patients with advanced NSGCT. Results of the randomized MRC trial comparing RT with carboplatin are of interest.

Surveillance for stage I testicular seminoma. Is it a good option?

Postorchidectomy treatment options in patients with stage I seminoma include surveillance (reserving treatment for patients who relapse), adjuvant radiation therapy (RT), and adjuvant chemotherapy. Adjuvant retroperitoneal RT remains the treatment of choice in most centers; however, the success of surveillance in stage I nonseminomatous germ cell testis tumors, the establishment of curative chemotherapy for advanced disease, and the improvements in CT have led to re-examination of the standard treatment approach. The available data from the surveillance and adjuvant RT series suggest that almost 100% of patients with stage I testicular seminoma are cured, whichever approach is chosen. This article presents an overview of the available information on all treatment options, the pros and cons of each approach, and indications for where surveillance fits into the armamentarium of clinicians dealing with this disease.

Testicular cancer

The following article provides a comprehensive review of male germ cell tumors; the pathology and the clinical manifestations of the tumors are discussed, as are the modern concepts of clinical staging. Patients with bulky stage II and stage III non-seminomatous germ cell tumors are treated with chemotherapy. The new international classification system has provided a very useful way to categorize these patients by prognosis. Patients with good- or intermediate-risk tumors may be treated with 3 courses of cisplatin, etoposide, and bleomycin (BEP) or 4 courses of etoposide and cisplatin (EP), and more than 90% of these patients will survive. Randomized trials have shown that, if only 3 courses of chemotherapy are to be given, the substitution of carboplatin for cisplatin and the omission of bleomycin are deleterious to outcome. Patients who still have a significant residual mass and normal markers after treatment should undergo a surgical resection of the residual tumor. Patients who are classified by the international classification system as having poor-risk tumors have about a 50% likelihood of survival, and many of these patients will require surgical resection of a residual tumor after chemotherapy. No randomized trial has proved a regimen to be superior to that of 4 courses of BEP. Currently, an ongoing trial is evaluating the effect of the early use of high-dose therapy in combination with hematopoietic rescue in patients with these types of tumors. Patients with small-volume stage II tumors are generally treated with retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). About 25% of the patients selected for this procedure will actually have pathologically negative nodes. Those with positive nodes may elect to receive adjuvant chemotherapy (2 courses of BEP), which will almost always prevent relapse. An alternate approach for patients willing to comply with monthly follow-up is surveillance, with chemotherapy deferred until relapse is noted. About 50% of these patients will be cured with surgery (as many as 75% have microscopic disease only). With careful follow-up, those destined to relapse can be treated promptly and at a time when they have small-volume tumors and an excellent prognosis if they go on to receive chemotherapy. Patients with clinical stage I nonseminomatous germ cell tumors may also undergo RPLND, although an acceptable alternative for these patients is surveillance. The advantages and the disadvantages of each approach are discussed. The overall risk of recurrence is about 30%, but there have been patient groups defined that may vary in risk from 10% to 15% up to 50% or more. Patients with advanced seminoma are treated with chemotherapy. When this procedure is used, outcomes are favorable and all patients are either in good- or intermediate-risk groups, according to the international classification system. Patients with small-volume stage II tumors are treated with radiotherapy. Radiation is also generally used for the treatment of clinical stage I patients, although surveillance is growing in prominence as a means to treat these patients. Late effects of treatment are also discussed in this article. Ejaculatory function can be preserved in most patients who have early stage tumors and who undergo RPLND and in some patients who undergo surgery after chemotherapy. The most troubling effect of chemotherapy is the development of etoposide-induced leukemia, a unique--and fortunately rare--clinical entity.

Cost-effectiveness of posttreatment surveillance after radiation therapy for early stage seminoma

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the cost-effectiveness of posttreatment surveillance after radiation therapy for early stage seminoma.

METHODS

From 1988-1995, 47 patients with Stage I, and 11 patients with Stage II seminoma (based on the Royal Marsden staging system) received paraaortic and pelvic lymph node radiation after radical orchiectomy. Patient records were reviewed and patients surveyed to determine the tests ordered for posttreatment surveillance.

RESULTS

With a median follow-up of 55 months, there were 2 recurrences among the 58 patients. Eight-year actuarial disease free survival was 93%, with 100% overall survival. Information concerning follow-up screening was available for 56 patients. The follow-up tests ordered included 842 physical examinations, 815 chest X-rays, 839 serum markers, 250 computerized tomography scans, and 112 abdominal plain films. The total cost of these examinations according to 1996 private sector charges and 1996 Medicare reimbursement rates, respectively, was $602,673.01 (average $10,762.02 per patient) and $282,746.52 (average $5049.05 per patient). The two patients who experienced recurrence were diagnosed independently of their posttreatment screening program. One patient recurred 7.5 months after his original diagnosis with an isolated spinal cord compression. The second patient had a mediastinum recurrence > 6 years after treatment. At last follow-up, both patients were disease free after salvage treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

Patients with early stage seminoma treated with orchiectomy and radiation have excellent disease free survival rates. The cost of the surveillance program studied does not appear to be justifiable.

Seminoma arising in corrected and uncorrected inguinal cryptorchidism: treatment and prognosis in 66 patients

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to analyze prognosis and treatment results for seminoma arising in corrected and uncorrected inguinal cryptorchidism (SCIC and SUIC).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We reviewed 66 patients with inguinal seminomas between June 1958 and December 1991 at the Cancer Hospital and Institute of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences. Of these patients, 23 had prior orchiopexy and 43 presented with an inguinal form of cryptorchidism. At presentation, 17 of 66 (26%) patients had nodal metastases. This nodal involvement was 30% (7 of 23) for SCIC and 23% (10 of 43) for SUIC, respectively. These numbers are comparable with those in a series of patients treated for scrotal seminoma at our institution (26% vs. 20%). However, 3 of 23 (13%) patients who had prior orchiopexy presented with inguinal nodal metastasis as compared with 0 of 43 patients with SUIC or 4 of 237 patients with scrotal seminoma (p < .05). There were 49 stage I, 5 stage IIA, 8 stage IIB, 3 stage III, and 1 stage IV patients. All patients underwent radical orchiectomy and received further radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or both. Patients with stage I and stage II disease were treated primarily with radiotherapy, whereas patients with stage III and IV disease were treated with chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The overall and disease-free survival at 5 and 10 years was 94% and 92%, 89% and 87%, respectively. The overall 5- and 10-year survival by stage was 100% and 100% for stage I, and 77% and 68% for stage II, respectively (p < .05). There was no significant difference in survival between SUIC and SCIC (93% vs. 96% at 5 years). Four patients developed relapse. Two of these four patients experienced relapse at the inguinal area, due to a marginal miss. Three of four patients with relapse were successfully salvaged, and one died of disease.

CONCLUSION

Our results indicate that prognosis for inguinal seminoma is excellent and similar to that of scrotal seminoma. Postorchiectomy radiotherapy can be considered as the standard treatment for stage I and IIA inguinal seminoma. We recommend routinely including the para-aortic and ipsilateral pelvic nodes.

Clinical characteristics, prognosis, and treatment of pelvic cryptorchid seminoma

PURPOSE

To analyze the clinical characteristics, prognosis, and treatment outcome of pelvic cryptorchid seminoma (PCS), and to determine whether whole abdominal-pelvic irradiation for Stage I disease is necessary.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From 1958 to 1991, 60 patients with PCS were treated at the Cancer Hospital of Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing. They presented with a lower abdominal mass and showed a predominance for the right side. A high proportion of patients with PCS [26 of 60 (43%)] had metastatic disease, compared to 20% of those with scrotal seminoma, and there was a tendency toward a higher frequency of pelvic nodal metastases. There were 34 Stage I, 6 Stage IIA, 11 Stage IIB, 5 Stage III, and 4 Stage IV patients. Of these 60 patients, 56 underwent laparotomy with or without cryptorchiectomy (37 radical orchiectomy, 7 partial orchiectomy, and 12 biopsy of the primary or cervical node), and 4 cervical node biopsy only. All patients were further treated with radiotherapy, chemotherapy, or a combination of both. Patients with Stage I and II disease received radiotherapy, whereas patients with Stage III and IV were treated with chemotherapy.

RESULTS

The overall and disease-free survivals at 5 and 10 years were 92% and 87%, and 88% and 84%, respectively. The 5- and 10-year survivals were 100% for Stage I, 94% and 87% for Stage II, and 56% and 42% for Stage III/IV, respectively (p < 0.05). Volume of irradiation, i.e., whole abdominal-pelvic radiotherapy (10 patients), versus hockey-stick encompassing paraaortic, ipsilateral iliac nodes and the primary tumor or tumor bed (17) did not influence outcome in Stage I patients. Five patients relapsed within 2-12 years after treatment, and four of these patients were successfully salvaged. Four patients developed a second malignant tumor and died.

CONCLUSION

Stage I and II PCS can be adequately controlled by radiotherapy regardless of the surgical procedure. Whole abdominal-pelvic irradiation for Stage I and IIA disease is not required, and fields can be limited to the paraaortic, ipsilateral iliac nodes and primary tumor or tumor bed. We recommend platinum-based chemotherapy for Stage IIB-IV PCS.

External beam abdominal radiotherapy in patients with seminoma stage I: field type, testicular dose, and spermatogenesis

PURPOSE

To establish a predictive model for the estimation of the gonadal dose during adjuvant para-aortic (PA) or dog leg (DL: PA plus ipsilateral iliac) field radiotherapy in patients with testicular seminoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The surface gonadal dose was measured in patients with seminoma Stage I receiving PA or DL radiotherapy. Sperm cell analysis was performed before and 1 year after irradiation. PA and DL radiotherapy were simulated in the Alderson phantom while we measured the dose to the surface and middle of an artificial testicle, varying its position within realistic anatomical constraints. The symphysis-to-testicle distance (STD), field length, and thickness of the patient were experimental variables. The developed mathematical model was validated in subsequent patients.

RESULTS

The mean gonadal dose in patients was 0.09 and 0.32 Gy after PA and DL irradiation, respectively (p < 0.001). DL radiotherapy, but not PA irradiation led to significant reduction of the sperm count 1 year after irradiation. The gonadal dose-reducing effect of PA irradiation was confirmed in the Alderson phantom. A significant correlation was found between the STD and the gonadal dose during DL irradiation. A mathematical model was established for calculation of the gonadal dose and confirmed by measurements in patients.

CONCLUSIONS

During radiotherapy of seminoma, the gonadal dose decreases with increasing STD. It is possible to predict the individual gonadal dose based on delivered midplane dose and STD.

Adjuvant radiation therapy for low stage testicular seminoma: Diagnosis and therapy in evolution

We performed a retrospective study to evaluate the clinical outcome of patients with early stage testicular seminoma who received adjuvant radiation therapy after orchiectomy over the past 15 years. During the 15 year period, 61 patients were treated with adjuvant radiation therapy for stages I, IIA, and IIB testicular seminoma. Patients received from 2,000 to 4,000 cGy delivered by a Cobalt machine and later by a linear accelerator. Our standard treatment protocol was modified in 13 patients: 7 secondary to abnormal lymphangiography (LAG) parameters and 6 due to abnormal computed tomography findings. We analyzed each patient's outcome for survival, recurrence, and complications. We then compared outcomes, looking for differing trends based on evolving evaluation or treatment techniques. The average follow-up is 75 months, with an overall survival rate of 93%. The cause specific survival is 100%. Four patients died from intercurrent diseases; at time of autopsy, one of these patients was noted to have a small focus of seminoma in a lateral inguinal node. He died from widely disseminated Hodgkin's disease. Three patients, including the aforementioned one, had recurrent disease outside of the radiation field, yielding a recurrence rate of 5%. No significant long term treatment complications were reported, although 24% of patients had one or more complications from LAG. Regardless the various changes in patient evaluation and radiation treatment techniques over the past 15 years, adjuvant radiation therapy remains effective in patients with early stage testicular seminoma.

Low-dose radiotherapy for stage I seminoma: early results

One hundred and one patients with stage I seminoma were irradiated with total doses of 30, 25.5 and 20 Gy to gradually reduced target volumes (paraaortic, pelvic, and inguinal regions to paraaortic only). Low doses and small target volumes resulted in excellent survival and freedom of recurrence but in more frequent nausea.

Radiotherapy for stages I and II testicular seminoma: results and morbidity in 238 patients

We have undertaken a retrospective analysis of 238 patients with Stages I and II seminoma of the testis treated with radiotherapy in Edinburgh between 1974 and 1989. There were five deaths from seminoma. Cause-specific survival for the whole group at 2 and 5 years was 99.2% and 98.1%, respectively. Cause-specific survival at 2 and 5 years by stage (Royal Marsden staging classification) was: Stage I, 99.5% and 98.7% and Stage II, 98.1% and 96.1%. Fourteen (5.9%) patients relapsed (one after treatment for his second testicular seminoma). Eight were given successful salvage treatment, five died of seminoma and one died of intercurrent disease. 13 (5.5%) patients developed World Health Organisation (WHO) grade 3 gastrointestinal or haematological toxicity and two developed grade 4 gastrointestinal toxicity as a result of abdominal radiotherapy. 22 patients (9.2%) developed problems ascribed to late morbidity of abdominal radiotherapy including 18 with peptic ulcer disease. Contralateral testicular tumours occurred in seven (2.9%) patients and five (2.1%) patients developed malignancies at other sites.