Immobilization improves the reproducibility of patient positioning during six-field conformal radiation therapy for prostate carcinoma

Optimal Bladder Condition in Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Prostate Cancer: The Role of Superior-Inferior Lengths of the Bladder and Dose Constraints

Background Optimal bladder conditions based on dose constraints in prostate cancer radiation therapy (RT) are important. In this study, the superior-inferior (SI) lengths of the bladder were assessed to define the ideal bladder state for RT. Materials and methods In this study, 50 prostate cancer cases treated with three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy between January and December 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Using their CT data, a volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plan was simulated. Bladder dose constraints and dimensions, including SI, right-left (RL), and anterior-posterior (AP) lengths, were assessed. In total, 28 cases met the dose constraints and 22 cases did not meet the dose constraints.  Results Median bladder volumes (BVs) for compliant and non-compliant cases were 163.6 ml and 88.5 ml, respectively (p<0.0001). For compliant plans, median bladder dimensions were RL: 78 mm, AP: 89 mm, and SI: 51 mm. Non-compliant plans showed RL: 72 mm, AP: 84 mm, and SI: 42 mm, with significant differences (SI: p=0.0004, RL: p=0.0065, AP: p=0.037). Established thresholds were SI: 46 mm, RL: 92 mm, AP: 75 mm, and BV: 142.8 ml. SI showed the strongest correlation with BV (coefficient: 0.78). Conclusions This study analyzed the SI lengths of the bladder concerning dose constraints in VMAT for prostate cancer. It was concluded that smooth treatment planning could be achieved with proper consideration of the bladder's SI distance. Further case collection and prospective studies are warranted.

Preliminary Clinical Evaluation of Intrafraction Prostate Displacements for Two Immobilization Systems

Immobilization systems and their corresponding set-up errors influence the clinical target volume to the planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins, which is critical for hypofractionated prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT). This preliminary study evaluates intrafraction prostate displacement for two immobilization systems (A and B). Six consecutive patients having localized prostate cancer and implanted prostate marker seeds were studied. Planar X-ray images were acquired pre- and post-treatment to find the intrafraction prostate displacement. The average absolute displacements (lateral, longitudinal, vertical) were 0.9 ± 0.4 mm, 1.7 ± 0.1 mm, 1.3 ± 0.3 mm (system A), and 0.5 ± 0.2 mm, 0.6 ± 0.1 mm, 0.8 ± 0.3 mm (system B), with average three-dimensional displacements of 2.6 ± 0.2 mm (system A) and 1.3 ± 0.2 mm (system B). The computed CTV-PTV margins (lateral, longitudinal, vertical) were 2.5 mm, 2.5 mm, 3.6 mm and 1.4 mm, 1.6 mm, 2.4 mm for systems A and B, respectively. This suggests that the immobilization system influences intrafraction prostate displacement and, therefore, the margins applied. However, the margins found for both systems are comparable to the margins used for hypofractionated prostate SBRT.

Impact of brachial plexus movement during radical radiotherapy for head and neck cancers: the case for a larger planning organ at risk volume margin

Introduction:

Treatment volumes for radical radiotherapy to head and neck cancers commonly extend into the lower neck, the territory of the brachial plexus (BP). There is a risk of radiation-induced brachial plexopathy, a non-reversible late toxicity experienced by a small number of patients. The BP was anatomically divided into superior and inferior divisions and analysed to establish if segmental inter-fractional BP movement should be considered when planning radiotherapy in this high-dose region.

Methods:

A retrospective single-centre analysis of 15 patients with head and neck cancers treated with radical bilateral neck irradiation was conducted. The extent of BP movement relative to the planning scan was assessed using weekly cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. The BP was contoured on the planning scan and the subsequent six weekly CBCTs; this was used to calculate the Jaccard Conformity Index (JCI) for the left, right, superior and inferior divisions of the BP.

Results:

The mean (±SD) JCI for right and left superior BP was 44·4±15·5%, whereas the mean (±SD) JCI for right and left inferior BP was 38·3±15·5%. There was a statistically significant difference between superior and inferior JCI, p=0·0002, 95% CI (−9·26 to −2·88). Bilateral superior BP JCI was higher, with better conformity than the corresponding inferior divisions.

Conclusions:

Inter-fractional BP movement occurs; the greatest movement is seen at the inferior division. This data suggest the need for re-evaluation of current BP margins and consideration of a larger inferior BP planning at risk volume (PRV) margin.

Comparing Setup Errors Using Portal Imaging in Patients With Gynecologic Cancers by Two Methods of Alignment

AIMS

Alignment tattoos on a lax abdomen contribute to misalignment of patients undergoing abdomino-pelvic radiotherapy (RT). The present study was undertaken to assess setup reproducibility in gynecologic cancer patients positioned identically but aligned for treatment to machine isocenter by two different ways.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A prospective study in 35 women treated with radical RT for gynecologic malignancy was undertaken. A RT planning contrast-enhanced computed tomography scan in the supine position using an foot and ankle positioning device was done, and three reference points tattooed on the reference plane, anteriorly at the mons pubis and one on each side laterally at a fixed table top-to-vertical height of 10 cm, whereas a fourth point was tattooed at the xiphoid in the anterior midline. Patients were aligned using either a field center, that is, conventional method (Arm I, n = 18) or by a new setup isocenter (Arm II, n = 17) defined by a cranial offset of 4 cm to the reference plane for daily treatment. Anterior and right lateral digitally reconstructed radiograph setup fields were created at the treatment isocenters and compared with orthogonal megavoltage portal images (PI) taken during initial 3 days of RT and subsequently twice weekly. Setup deviations-rotations and translations were analysed in mediolateral (ML), craniocaudal, and anteroposterior direction. No online and offline corrections were performed. Population systematic error and random error were calculated and planning target volume margins required were estimated using van Herk's formula.

RESULTS

Arm I had 209 PI while Arm II had 188 PI. Patients in arm II had a lesser systematic error in the ML direction. Patients with large pelvic girth (>95 cm) were susceptible for greater movements during treatment, more so in Arm I, major shifts (>5 mm) with respect to Arm II in the ML direction (37% vs. 22%, P = .001). A larger planning target volume expansion was required in Arm I (1.6 cm) compared with Arm II (0.9 cm). The margin expansion required from clinical target volume in anteroposterior direction was about 0.6 cm and about a cm in the craniocaudal direction in both the arm.

CONCLUSIONS

Alignment of patient with anterior tattoo at the relatively immobile portion of lower abdomen (mons pubis) Arm II (setup) is superior to a more cranial location over the flabby abdomen during radiation treatment.

The relation between patient discomfort and uncompensated forces of a patient support device for breast and regional lymph node radiotherapy

Although many authors stated that a user-centred design approach in medical device development has added values, the most common research approach within healthcare is evidence-based medicine, which tend to focus on functional data rather than patient wellbeing and comfort. End user comfort is well addressed in literature for commercial products such as seats and hand tools but no data was found for medical devices. A commercial patient support device for breast radiotherapy was analysed and a relation was found between discomfort and uncompensated internal body forces. Derived from CT-images, simplified patient free-body diagrams were analysed and pain and comfort evaluated. Subsequently, a new patient position was established and prototypes were developed. Patient comfort- and prototype optimization was done through iterative prototyping. With this approach, we were able to compensate all internal body forces and establish a force neutral patient free-body diagram. This resulted in comfortable patient positioning and favourable medical results.

Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer

Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) has become the standard radiotherapy technology utilized for the treatment of prostate cancer, as it permits the delivery of highly conformal radiation dose distributions. Image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) is an essential companion to IMRT that allows the treatment team to account for daily changes in target anatomy and positioning. In the present review, we will discuss the different sources of geometric uncertainty and review the rationale behind using IGRT in the treatment of prostate cancer. We will then describe commonly employed IGRT techniques and review their benefits and drawbacks. Additionally, we will review the evidence suggesting a potential clinical benefit to utilizing IGRT.

Quality Control by Portal Film Analysis in Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: A Comparison between Two Different Institutions and Treatment Techniques

AIMS AND BACKGROUND

Accuracy and reproducibility of patient setup during radiotherapy for prostate cancer were investigated in two different Institutions (A and B), within their Quality Assurance programs. The purpose of the study was to evaluate and compare setup accuracy and reproducibility in Institutions A and B, which adopt different patient positioning and treatment techniques for prostate irradiation.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A retrospective analysis of portal localization films taken during the treatment course was performed: 30 and 21 patients in Institutes A and B, respectively, entered the study. In Institute A, patients were treated in a prone position, utilizing an individualized immobilization cast (either an alpha cradle or a heat and vacuum-formed cellulose acetate cast) with an open table top and individual abdominal wall compressor to minimize small bowel irradiation; a 5-field conformal technique was used. In Institute B, patients were treated in a supine position without any immobilization device; a 6-field BEV-based technique (conformal only for patients treated with a radical aim) was adopted. A total of 598 portal films (420 from Institute A and 178 from Institute B) were analyzed. The mean number of films per patient was 12 (range, 4-29). Systematic and random setup errors were estimated utilizing the statistical method suggested by Bijhold et al. (1992).

RESULTS

When patients with a mean (systematic) error larger than 5, 8 and 10 mm in craniocaudal, lateral and posterior-anterior directions, respectively, were compared, no statistically significant difference between the two groups was observed. Similarly, when comparing portal films, a significant difference (P <0.01) appeared only in the craniocaudal direction (errors > 5 mm: Institute A = 24%; Institute B = 11%). In both Institutes, the SD of random and systematic error distribution ranged from 1.8 to 4.2 mm, with a small prevalence of systematic errors. Only for craniocaudal shifts in Institute A was the random error larger than the systematic error, and it was significantly worse than in Institute B (1 SD, 4.2 mm in Institute A vs 1.8 mm in Institute B).

CONCLUSIONS

Setup errors observed in Institutes A and B were similar and in accord with data reported in the literature. In Institute B, satisfactory geometrical treatment quality was achieved without patient immobilization. In Institute A, the goal of minimizing small bowel irradiation and prostate motion through the aforementioned technique, which makes patient position less comfortable, did not seem to considerably increase daily setup uncertainty.

Tumor Volume Reduction Assessed by Planning Computed Tomography in Patients with Rectal Cancer during Preoperative Chemoradiation: Impact of Residual Tumor Volume on the Prediction of Pathologic Tumor Regression

Aims and Background

To determine whether the residual tumor volume measured using the Eclipse treatment planning system correlates with pathologic tumor regression grade after preoperative chemoradiotherpy for rectal cancer.

Materials and Methods

The study included 30 patients with rectal cancer who had undergone preoperative chemoradiotherpy followed by surgery from June 2008 to April 2011 at the Korea University Guro Hospital. The tumor volume was measured using the Eclipse treatment planning system in the initial simulation computed tomography and boost planning computed tomography. The correlation between the residual tumor volume in boost planning computed tomography and the pathologic tumor regression grade was analyzed. Tumor regression grade defined in the American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition was used.

Results

The mean and median residual tumor volume was 57.34% ± 20.37% and 52.35% (range, 18.42%-95.79%), respectively. After surgery, pathologic complete response (tumor regression grade 0) occurred in 4 patients (13.33%), moderate response (tumor regression grade 1) in 18 patients (60%), minimal response (tumor regression grade 2) in 4 patients (13.33%), and poor response (tumor regression grade 3) in 4 patients (13.33%). When residual tumor volume was categorized into two groups (<50% and ≥50%), complete or moderate regression (tumor regression grade 0 or 1) was significantly greater for patients with a residual tumor volume <50% (P <0.05). The mean residual tumor volume of tumor regression grade 0 or 1 was 49.07% ± 18.39% and that of tumor regression grade 2 or 3 was 76.31% ± 16.94% (P <0.05).

Conclusions

Residual tumor volume measured using routine boost planning computed tomography during preoperative chemoradiotherpy correlated significantly with pathologic tumor regression grade after surgery.

Comparison of set up accuracy among three common immobilisation systems for intensity modulated radiotherapy of nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients

Introduction

In intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients, an effective immobilisation system is important to minimise set up deviation. This study evaluated the effectiveness of three immobilisation systems by assessing their set up deviations.

Methods

Patients were randomly assigned to one of the three immobilisation systems: (1) supine on head rest and base plate (HB); (2) supine with alpha cradle supporting the head and shoulder (AC); (3) supine with vacuum bag supporting the head and shoulder (VB). CBCT was conducted weekly for each patient on the linear accelerator. Image registration was conducted at the nasopharynx (NP) and cervical regions. The translational displacements (latero‐medial, antero‐posterior and cranio‐caudal), rotational displacements (pitch, yaw and roll) and 3D vectors obtained at the NP and cervical regions were recorded and compared among the three systems.

Results

The mean translational and rotational deviations were within 3 mm and 2°, respectively, and the range of 3D vector was 1.53–3.47 mm. At the NP region, the AC system demonstrated the smallest translational and rotational deviations and 3D vector. The differences were significant except for the latero‐medial, yaw and roll directions. Similarly, at the cervical region, the AC system showed smaller translational and rotational deviations and 3D vector, with only the cranio‐caudal and yaw deviations that did not reach statistical significance.

Conclusions

Set up deviation was greater in the neck than the NP region. The set up accuracy of the AC system was better than the other two systems, and it is recommended for IMRT of NPC patients in our institution.

A comparison of two systems of patient immobilization for prostate radiotherapy

BACKGROUND

Reproducibility of different immobilization systems, which may affect set-up errors, remains uncertain. Immobilization systems and their corresponding set-up errors influence the clinical target volume to planning target volume (CTV-PTV) margins and thus may result in undesirable treatment outcomes. This study compared the reproducibility of patient positioning with Hipfix system and whole body alpha cradle with respect to localized prostate cancer and investigated the existing CTV-PTV margins in the clinical oncology departments of two hospitals.

METHODS

Forty sets of data of patients with localized T1-T3 prostate cancer were randomly selected from two regional hospitals, with 20 patients immobilized by a whole-body alpha cradle system and 20 by a thermoplastic Hipfix system. Seven sets of the anterior-posterior (AP), cranial-caudal (CC) and medial-lateral (ML) deviations were collected from each patient. The reproducibility of patient positioning within the two hospitals was compared using a total vector error (TVE) parameter. In addition, CTV-PTV margins were computed using van Herk's formula. The resulting values were compared to the current CTV-PTV margins in both hospitals.

RESULTS

The TVE values were 5.1 and 2.8 mm for the Hipfix and the whole-body alpha cradle systems respectively. TVE associated with the whole-body alpha cradle system was found to be significantly less than the Hipfix system (p < 0.05). The CC axis in the Hipfix system attained the highest frequency of large (23.6%) and serious (7.9%) set-up errors. The calculated CTV to PTV margin was 8.3, 1.9 and 2.3 mm for the Hipfix system, and 2.1, 3.4 and 1.8 mm for the whole body alpha cradle in CC, ML and AP axes respectively. All but one (CC axis using Hipfix) margin calculated did not exceed the corresponding hospital protocol. The whole body alpha cradle system was found to be significantly better than the Hipfix system in terms of reproducibility (p < 0.05), especially in the CC axis.

CONCLUSIONS

The whole body alpha cradle system was more reproducible than the Hipfix system. In particular, the difference in CC axis contributed most to the results and the current CC margin for the Hipfix system might be considered as inadequate.

Comparison of the effectiveness of different immobilization systems in different body regions using daily megavoltage CT in helical tomotherapy

OBJECTIVE

Effective immobilization is crucial for the accurate delivery of radiotherapy. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of the commonly used immobilization systems for different body regions using megavoltage CT (MVCT).

METHODS

Daily treatment set-up data from 212 patients treated by helical tomotherapy (Accuray, Sunnyvale, CA) in 6 body regions (52 head and neck, 41 chest, 38 abdomen, 36 pelvis, 18 breast and 27 cranium) were obtained. Based on a verification tool using the pre-treatment MVCT, set-up corrections for each patient were recorded. Mean systematic and random errors of lateral, longitudinal, vertical and roll directions and three-dimensional vectors were compared between immobilization systems of each region.

RESULTS

Smaller set-up deviations were observed in the Orfit system (Orfit Industries NV, Wijnegem, Belgium) of the head and neck region, while the performance of immobilization systems for the chest, abdomen and pelvis regions was similar. Larger differences were noted in the breast group, where the prone BodyFIX® system (Medical Intelligence, Medizintechnik GmbH, Schwabmünchen, Germany) was less stable than the supine VacLok® system (CIVCO Medical Solutions, Orange City, IA).

CONCLUSION

Differences were found between the immobilization systems in the head and neck region, in which the Orfit system was relatively more effective, whereas the VacLok and BodyFIX systems performed similarly in the chest, abdomen and pelvis regions. For the breast case, the supine position with VacLok was much more stable than the prone breast technique. The results provided references for the estimation of clinical target volume-planning target volume margins.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This is the first article on comprehensive comparisons performed in immobilization systems for main body regions that provides some practical recommendations.

Interfractional variability in intensity-modulated radiotherapy of prostate cancer with or without thermoplastic pelvic immobilization

PURPOSE

To determine the variability of patient positioning errors associated with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) for prostate cancer and to assess the impact of thermoplastic pelvic immobilization on these errors using kilovoltage (kV) cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From February 2012 to June 2012, the records of 314 IMRT sessions in 19 patients with prostate cancer, performed with or without immobilization at two different facilities in the Korea University Hospital were analyzed. The kV CBCT images were matched to simulation computed tomography (CT) images to determine the simulation-to-treatment variability. The shifts along the x (lateral)-, y (longitudinal)- and z (vertical)-axes were measured, as was the shift in the three dimensional (3D) vector.

RESULTS

The measured systematic errors in the immobilized group during treatment were 0.46 ± 1.75 mm along the x-axis, - 0.35 ± 3.83 mm along the y-axis, 0.20 ± 2.75 mm along the z-axis and 4.05 ± 3.02 mm in the 3D vector. Those of nonimmobilized group were - 1.45 ± 7.50 mm along the x-axis, 1.89 ± 5.07 mm along the y-axis, 0.28 ± 3.81 mm along the z-axis and 8.90 ± 4.79 mm in the 3D vector. The group immobilized with pelvic thermoplastics showed reduced interfractional variability along the x- and y-axes and in the 3D vector compared to the nonimmobilized group (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSION

IMRT with thermoplastic pelvic immobilization in patients with prostate cancer appears to be useful in stabilizing interfractional variability during the planned treatment course.

Comparison of geometric uncertainties between alpha cradle and thermoplastic ray cast immobilisation in abdominopelvic radiotherapy: a prospective study

Context: Setup error significantly affects the accuracy of treatment and outcome in high precision radiotherapy.

Aims: To determine total, systematic, random error and clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margin with alpha cradle (VL) and ray cast (RC) immobilisation in abdominopelvic region.

Methods and material: Setup error was compared by using digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) as reference image with electronic portal image (EPI) taken during the treatment. Statistical analysis used: The total errors in mediolateral (ML), craniocaudal (CC) and anteroposterior (AP) directions were compared by t-test. For systematic and random errors variance ratio test (F-statistics) was used. Margins were calculated using International Commission of Radiation Units (ICRU), Stroom’s and van Herk’s formula.

Results: A total number of 306 portal images were analysed with 144 images in RC group and 162 images in VL group. For VL, in ML, CC, AP directions systematic errors were, in cm, (0.45, 0.29, 0.41), random errors (0.48, 0.32, 0.58), CTV to PTV margins (1.24, 0.80, 1.25), respectively. For RC, systematic errors were (0.25, 0.37, 0.80), random error (0.46, 0.80, 0.33), CTV to PTV margins (0.82, 1.30, 1.08), respectively. The difference of random error in CC and AP directions were statistically significant.

Conclusions: Geometric errors and CTV to PTV margins are different in different directions. For abdomen and pelvis in VL immobilisation, the margin ranged from 8 mm to 12.4 mm and for RC it was 8.2 mm to 13 mm. Therefore, a margin of 10 mm with online correction would be adequate.

A prospective randomised controlled clinical trial to evaluate three immobilisation devices for intra-thoracic radiation therapy

Purpose: To determine the optimal of three immobilisation devices for lung radiotherapy in terms of set-up reproducibility, patient comfort, radiation therapists’ (RTs) satisfaction and cost-effectiveness.

Materials and methods: A total of 30 lung CRT patients were randomised to one of three immobilisation techniques – Arm A, headsponge; Arm B, BreastBoard dedicated immobilisation device; and Arm C, LungBoard dedicated immobilisation device.

Results: Random errors were larger for Arm A versus C in all directions (p < 0.05). Random errors were larger for Arm A versus B for y and z directions (p < 0.05). When the data for the immobilisation devices (Arms B+C) were pooled and compared with Arm A (no dedicated device), the systematic errors were larger in the z direction for A (p < 0.05). Arm C was cheaper and was more comfortable for patients. Therapists preferred this device (Arm C) and treatment times were less (p < 0.05).

Conclusion: This is the first prospective randomised controlled lung immobilisation trial, based on 3-DCRT, that takes into account treatment accuracy, users satisfaction and resource implications. It suggests that the LungBoard immobilisation device is optimal.

A Retrospective Review of the Effect of a Simple Foot Immobilization Device for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer

BACKGROUND

The goal of radical radiation therapy is to eradicate tumor cells by delivering maximum dose to the target volume. This requires accurate daily positioning of the patient to minimize the chances of a geographical miss of the target and minimize dose to surrounding normal tissue. Numerous studies have been conducted to find the best immobilization device to improve reproducibility and setup of patient positioning for men with prostate cancer with inconclusive results.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to evaluate retrospectively, the consistency and reproducibility of prostate patient positioning using a simple foot immobilization device compared with patients treated without any immobilization device.

METHODS

A retrospective chart analysis was completed on 40 patients with histopathologically confirmed adenocarcinoma of the prostate between April 2007 and May 2007. Twenty charts were randomly selected for men treated without any immobilization device and 20 charts were randomly selected for men treated with the foot strap immobilization. Incidence and frequency of isocenter shifts were the primary end points of this study. Direction and magnitude of shifts were secondary end points.

RESULTS

The frequency of isocenter shifts were greater in the patients treated without immobilization (35%) than with patients treated with foot strap immobilization (10%). Required shifts were in either the superoinferior direction or in the right/left direction. No shifts were required in the anteroposterior direction. Magnitude of shifts greater than and equal to 1.0 cm in magnitude was seen only in those treated without immobilization.

CONCLUSION

The foot strap is a simple and inexpensive method of improving daily setup reliability and reducing the need for isocenter shifts.

Setup reproducibility for thoracic and upper gastrointestinal radiation therapy: Influence of immobilization method and on-line cone-beam CT guidance

We report the setup reproducibility of thoracic and upper gastrointestinal (UGI) radiotherapy (RT) patients for 2 immobilization methods evaluated through cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) image guidance, and present planning target volume (PTV) margin calculations made on the basis of these observations. Daily CBCT images from 65 patients immobilized in a chestboard (CB) or evacuated cushion (EC) were registered to the planning CT using automatic bony anatomy registration. The standardized region-of-interest for matching was focused around vertebral bodies adjacent to tumor location. Discrepancies >3 mm between the CBCT and CT datasets were corrected before initiation of RT and verified with a second CBCT to assess residual error (usually taken after 90 s of the initial CBCT). Positional data were analyzed to evaluate the magnitude and frequencies of setup errors before and after correction. The setup distributions were slightly different for the CB (797 scans) and EC (757 scans) methods, and the probability of adjustment at a 3-mm action threshold was not significantly different (p = 0.47). Setup displacements >10 mm in any direction were observed in 10% of CB fractions and 16% of EC fractions (p = 0.0008). Residual error distributions after CBCT guidance were equivalent regardless of immobilization method. Using a published formula, the PTV margins for the CB were L/R, 3.3 mm; S/I, 3.5 mm; and A/P, 4.6 mm), and for EC they were L/R, 3.7 mm; S/I, 3.3 mm; and A/P, 4.6 mm. In the absence of image guidance, the CB slightly outperformed the EC in precision. CBCT allows reduction to a single immobilization system that can be chosen for efficiency, logistics, and cost. Image guidance allows for increased geometric precision and accuracy and supports a corresponding reduction in PTV margin.

Accuracy and reproducibility of conformal radiotherapy using data from a randomised controlled trial of conformal radiotherapy in prostate cancer (MRC RT01, ISRCTN47772397)

Aims

The MRC RT01 trial used conformal radiotherapy to the prostate, a method that reduces the volume of normal tissue treated by 40–50%. Because of the risk of geographical miss, the trial used portal imaging to examine whether treatment delivery was within the required accuracy.

Material and methods

In total, 843 patients were randomly assigned to receive 64 Gy in 32 fractions over 6.5 weeks or 74 Gy in 37 fractions over 7.5 weeks. Field displacements and corrections were recorded for all imaged fractions. Displacement trends and their association with time, disease and treatment set-up characteristics were examined using univariate and multivariate analyses. A Radiographer Trial Implementation Group (RTIG) was set up to inform the quality assurance process and to promote the development of best practice.

Results

Treatment isocentre positioning was within 5 mm in every direction on 6238 (83%) of the 7535 fractions imaged. In total, 532 (81%) of 695 included patients had at least one ≥ 3mm displacement and 415 (63%) had at least one ≥ 5mm displacement. Univariate, multivariate and stepwise models of ≥ 5mm displacements showed an increased likelihood of displacement in weeks 1 and 2 with low melting point alloy (LMPA) blocks compared with multileaf collimators, film verification compared with electronic portal imaging (EPI) and increased number of fractions imaged. Except for LMPA, this was also seen for ≥ 5mm displacements in weeks 3–6.

Conclusions

Accurate conformal treatment was delivered. The use of EPI was associated with increased reported accuracy. The RTIG was a crucial part of the quality assurance process.

Inter- and intrafractional tumor and organ movement in patients with cervical cancer undergoing radiotherapy: a cinematic-MRI point-of-interest study

PURPOSE

Internal tumor and organ movement is important when considering intensity-modulated radiotherapy for patients with cancer of the cervix because of the tight margins and steep dose gradients. In this study, the internal movement of the tumor, cervix, and uterus were examined using serial cinematic magnetic resonance imaging scans and point-of-interest analysis.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Twenty patients with Stage IB-IVA cervical cancer underwent pelvic magnetic resonance imaging before treatment and then weekly during external beam radiotherapy. In each 30-min session, sequential T(2)-sagittal magnetic resonance imaging scans were obtained. The points of interest (cervical os, uterine canal, and uterine fundus) were traced on each image frame, allowing the craniocaudal and anteroposterior displacements to be measured. The mean displacements and trends were analyzed using mixed linear models. Prediction intervals were calculated to determine the internal target margins.

RESULTS

Large interscan motion was found for all three points of interest that was only partially explained by the variations in bladder and rectal filling. The intrascan motion was much smaller. Both inter- and intrascan motion was greatest at the fundus of the uterus, less along the canal, and least at the cervical os. The isotropic internal target margins required to encompass 90% of the interscan motion were 4 cm at the fundus and 1.5 cm at the os. In contrast, smaller margins of 1 cm and 0.45 cm, respectively, were adequate to encompass the intrascan motion alone.

CONCLUSION

Daily soft-tissue imaging with correction for interfractional motion or adaptive replanning will be important if the benefits of intensity-modulated radiotherapy are to be maximized in women with cervical cancer.

Patient positioning error measurement based on dynamic template matching techniques

The decrease of accuracy in patients' repeated positioning in radiotherapy due to body's transformation is considered and a positioning error measurement method using dynamic template matching technique is brought forward in this paper. This method is an improvement of the matching method to correct positioning error based on the CT digitally reconstructed radiograph(DRR), which uses the video reconstructed 3D surface model that can reflect the body's transformation as the matching template instead of DRR. This method can not only improve the positioning accuracy but also eliminate the adverse influence brought by body's transformation.

The efficacy of conventional external beam, three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, particle beam radiation, and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

Technologic advances in radiation treatment planning and delivery have generated popular interest in the different radiation therapy techniques used in treating patients with localized prostate cancer. Throughout the past decade, high-energy (> 4 MV) linear accelerators have largely replaced Cobalt machines in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) delivery. Conventional EBRT has been used to treat prostate cancer successfully since the 1950s. By switching to computed tomography-based planning, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy provides better relative conformality of dose than does conventional EBRT. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has further refined dose conformality by spreading the low-dose region to a larger volume. However, the potential long-term risks of larger volumes of normal tissues receiving low doses of radiation in IMRT are unknown. Particle-beam radiation therapy offers unique dose distributions and characteristics with higher relative biologic effect and linear energy transfer. Transperineal prostate brachytherapy offers the shortest treatment time with equivalent efficacy without significant risk of radiation exposure. The addition of hormonal therapy to radiation therapy has been shown to improve the outcome of radiation therapy.

Image-guided radiotherapy for prostate cancer by CT–linear accelerator combination: Prostate movements and dosimetric considerations

PURPOSE

Multiple studies have indicated that the prostate is not stationary and can move as much as 2 cm. Such prostate movements are problematic for intensity-modulated radiotherapy, with its associated tight margins and dose escalation. Because of these intrinsic daily uncertainties, a relative generous "margin" is necessary to avoid marginal misses. Using the CT-linear accelerator combination in the treatment suite (Primatom, Siemens), we found that the daily intrinsic prostate movements can be easily corrected before each radiotherapy session. Dosimetric calculations were performed to evaluate the amount of discrepancy of dose to the target if no correction was done for prostate movement.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The Primatom consists of a Siemens Somatom CT scanner and a Siemens Primus linear accelerator installed in the same treatment suite and sharing a common table/couch. The patient is scanned by the CT scanner, which is movable on a pair of horizontal rails. During scanning, the couch does not move. The exact location of the prostate, seminal vesicles, and rectum are identified and localized. These positions are then compared with the planned positions. The daily movement of the prostate and rectum were corrected for and a new isocenter derived. The patient was treated immediately using the new isocenter.

RESULTS

Of the 108 patients with primary prostate cancer studied, 540 consecutive daily CT scans were performed during the last part of the cone down treatment. Of the 540 scans, 46% required no isocenter adjustments for the AP-PA direction, 54% required a shift of > or =3 mm, 44% required a shift of >5 mm, and 15% required a shift of >10 mm. In the superoinferior direction, 27% required a shift of >3 mm, 25% required a shift of >5 mm, and 4% required a shift of >10 mm. In the right-left direction, 34% required a shift of >3 mm, 24% required a shift of >5 mm, and 5% required a shift of >10 mm. Dosimetric calculations for a typical case of prostate cancer using intensity-modulated radiotherapy with 5-mm margin coverage from the clinical target volume (prostate gland) was performed. With a posterior shift of 10 mm for the prostate, the dose coverage dropped from 95-107% to 71-100% coverage.

CONCLUSION

We have described a technique that corrects for the daily prostate motion, allowing for extremely precise prostate cancer treatment. This technique has significant implications for dose escalation and for decreasing rectal complications in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Impact of knee support and shape of tabletop on rectum and prostate position

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of different tabletops with or without a knee support on the position of the rectum, prostate, and bulb of the penis; and to evaluate the effect of these patient-positioning devices on treatment planning.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

For 10 male volunteers, five MRI scans were made in four different positions: on a flat tabletop with knee support, on a flat tabletop without knee support, on a rounded tabletop with knee support, and on a rounded tabletop without knee support. The fifth scan was in the same position as the first. With image registration, the position differences of the rectum, prostate, and bulb of the penis were measured at several points in a sagittal plane through the central axis of the prostate. A planning target volume was generated from the delineated prostates with a margin of 10 mm in three dimensions. A three-field treatment plan with a prescribed dose of 78 Gy to the International Commission on Radiation Units and Measurements point was automatically generated from each planning target volume. Dose-volume histograms were calculated for all rectal walls.

RESULTS

The shape of the tabletop did not affect the rectum and prostate position. Addition of a knee support shifted the anterior and posterior rectal walls dorsally. For the anterior rectal wall, the maximum dorsal shift was 9.9 mm (standard error of the mean [SEM] 1.7 mm) at the top of the prostate. For the posterior rectal wall, the maximum dorsal shift was 10.2 mm (SEM 1.5 mm) at the middle of the prostate. Therefore, the rectal filling was pushed caudally when a knee support was added. The knee support caused a rotation of the prostate around the left-right axis at the apex (i.e., a dorsal rotation) by 5.6 degrees (SEM 0.8 degrees ) and shifts in the caudal and dorsal directions of 2.6 mm (SEM 0.4 cm) and 1.4 mm (SEM 0.6 mm), respectively. The position of the bulb of the penis was not influenced by the use of a knee support or rounded tabletop. The volume of the rectal wall receiving the same dose range (e.g., 40-75 Gy) was reduced by 3.5% (SEM 0.9%) when a knee support was added. No significant differences were observed between the first and fifth scan (flat tabletop with knee support) for all measured points, thereby excluding time trends.

CONCLUSIONS

The rectum and prostate were significantly shifted dorsally by the use of a knee support. The rectum shifted more than the prostate, resulting in a dose benefit compared with irradiation without knee support. The shape of the tabletop did not influence the rectum or prostate position.

High conformality radiotherapy in Europe: thirty-one centres participating in the quality assurance programme of the EORTC prostate trial 22991

Today, conformality in radiotherapy is at the centre of many investments in equipment and staffing. To estimate the current situation within the European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) conformal radiotherapy trial for prostate cancer, a technology questionnaire was designed to assess whether participating centres can comply with the required radiotherapy procedures of EORTC trial 22991, where a high dose is prescribed to the prostate. Questions covered various items of computed tomography, data acquisition, treatment planning, delivery and verification. All centres (n=31) replied to the questionnaire. All generate beam's eye views and dose volume histograms. All, but two, centres use digitally reconstructed radiographs to display images. The vast majority of the centres perform at least weekly treatment verification and half have access to individual in vivo dosimetry. The results of the questionnaire indicate that participating centres have access to the equipment and apply the procedures that are essential for conformal prostate radiotherapy. The technology questionnaire is the first step in the extensive quality assurance programme dedicated to this high-tech radiotherapy trial.

Rapid involution and mobility of carcinoma of the cervix

PURPOSE

To quantitatively describe the involution and mobility of carcinoma of the cervix while under treatment with chemoradiotherapy (both with external beam radiation [EBRT] and high-dose-rate [HDR] intracavitary therapy). These data have implications for conformal or intensity modulated radiation therapy boost to the cervix.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Seventeen patients underwent HDR brachytherapy boost to the cervix and were evaluated by repeat clinical examinations. In most cases, 5 weekly HDR brachytherapy insertions were performed after approximately 2 to 3 weeks of the initiation of EBRT. Sequential clinical tumor sizes were recorded in the chart for each patient under treatment. Linear regression analyses were performed to analyze tumor size as a function of total dose of external beam plus brachytherapy and number of elapsed days during the treatment course. In addition, the mobility of the cervix was documented by placement of a uterine sleeve for HDR brachytherapy before the initiation of therapy, and changes in sleeve position were identified on portal films relative to the midline of the pubic symphysis, in three dimensions. The anatomic position of the cervix was also identified at the time of simulation for HDR brachytherapy.

RESULTS

Seventeen patients were identified and selected to receive HDR brachytherapy at our institution. Sixteen of the 17 patients received concurrent chemotherapy. The median dose at which tumor was no longer clinically evident was 61.5 Gy (95% confidence interval [CI]: 50.7-72.3 Gy) by linear regression analysis. This indicates that the median dose to achieve a 50% reduction in tumor size is approximately 30.8 Gy. Similarly, the median number of elapsed days for a complete response was 42 days (95% CI: 34-50 elapsed days). This indicates that it takes 21 days to achieve a 50% clinical complete response for patients undergoing concurrent cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy and HDR brachytherapy. In addition, the mobility of the cervix during EBRT was noted by serial measurements of the location of a metallic ring in the uterine sleeve, as seen on port films. The median and maximum ranges for change in the position of the cervix in the lateral (x), superior/inferior (y), and anterior/posterior (z) planes were 10, 8, and 16 mm and 24, 36, and 23 mm, respectively. Also, 85 brachytherapy procedures were performed, and the positions of the cervix on 170 orthogonal films were evaluated. The median and maximum ranges for the position of the cervix at the time of HDR brachytherapy in the lateral (x), superior/inferior (y), and anterior/posterior (z) planes were 5, 12, and 10 mm and 11, 25, and 32 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Carcinoma of the cervix involutes rapidly with EBRT, concurrent cisplatin-based chemotherapy, and HDR brachytherapy. The time for 50% tumor regression was calculated to be 21 days and occurs after 30.8 Gy. In addition, uterine sleeve placement allowed us to document the median and maximum ranges of cervical mobility during the treatment course of EBRT to be 8-16 mm and 23-36 mm, and at the time of HDR brachytherapy to be 5-12 mm and 11-32 mm, respectively. These data indicate that the cervix gross tumor volume changes rapidly in a systematic fashion during chemoradiotherapy and, together with the mobility of the cervix, urge caution in nonbrachytherapy boost planning.

A randomized trial evaluating rigid immobilization for pelvic irradiation

BACKGROUND

Accuracy and reproducibility of the patient's position is fundamental to the successful delivery of radiation therapy. In recent years, a number of pelvic immobilization techniques have been developed. Few have been evaluated in randomized trials, and many of these studies have produced contradictory and inconclusive results.

PURPOSE

To assess whether the use of rigid immobilization devices improve the accuracy and reproducibility of prostate irradiation to a clinically useful degree.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 100 patients receiving radical irradiation for either prostate or bladder cancer were randomized to be treated with or without the use of rigid immobilization (RI) devices. Of these, 96 patients were suitable for analysis. The control group consisted of the patients being simulated and treated in the prone position with no immobilization devices. Patients randomized to the immobilized arm were simulated and treated prone using a customized Uvex cast of the pelvis as well as ankle- and shoulder-stabilizing devices. Weekly orthogonal port films (PFs) were obtained for each patient. Using previously specified bone landmarks, we measured variations in the isocenter position on each PF compared with the simulation film. The assessors were unaware of the treatment assignment. Patient comfort, skin toxicity, and treatment times were recorded.

RESULTS

The average simulation-to-treatment deviation of the isocenter position was 8.5 mm in the control group and 6.2 mm in the immobilization group (p < 0.001). In the control arm, 30.9% of port films had isocenter deviations >10 mm compared with 10.6% in the immobilized arm (p = 0.001). For the control group, average deviations in the anteroposterior, right-left, and superior-inferior directions were 5.2 mm, 3.2 mm, and 4.3 mm, respectively, compared with 2.9 mm, 2.1 mm, and 3.9 mm for the immobilized group (p = <0.001, p < 0.001, p = 0.55). The RTOG skin reaction was greater with in patients with a cast (28% having Grade 2 toxicity vs. 10% in the control arm), although this was not statistically significant (p = 0.68). Patients in both groups found the treatment position comfortable: 90% in the immobilized group and 87% in the control group scored the treatment position either reasonably or very comfortable. Treatment times were very similar between the two groups: the average treatment time was 15.5 min in the control group vs. 16.1 min in the immobilized group (p = 0.82).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of rigid immobilization improves the accuracy of treatment delivery for the prone position, especially in the anteroposterior direction. Of clinical importance, the number of major deviations >10 mm (that is, that would result in a geographic miss) was reduced from 31% to 11%.

Patient setup error measurement using 3D intensity-based image registration techniques

PURPOSE

Conformal radiotherapy requires accurate patient positioning with reference to the initial three-dimensional (3D) CT image. Patient setup is controlled by comparison with portal images acquired immediately before patient treatment. Several automatic methods have been proposed, generally based on segmentation procedures. However, portal images are of very low contrast, leading to segmentation inaccuracies. In this study, we propose an intensity-based (with no segmentation), fully automatic, 3D method, associating two portal images and a 3D CT scan to estimate patient setup.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Images of an anthropomorphic phantom were used. A CT scan of the pelvic area was first acquired, then the phantom was installed in seven positions. The process is a 3D optimization of a similarity measure in the space of rigid transformations. To avoid time-consuming digitally reconstructed radiograph generation at each iteration, we used two-dimensional transformations and two sets of specific and pregenerated digitally reconstructed radiographs. We also propose a technique for computing intensity-based similarity measures between several couples of images. A correlation coefficient, chi-square, mutual information, and correlation ratio were used.

RESULTS

The best results were obtained with the correlation ratio. The median root mean square error was 2.0 mm for the seven positions tested and was, respectively, 3.6, 4.4, and 5.1 for correlation coefficient, chi-square, and mutual information.

CONCLUSIONS

Full 3D analysis of setup errors is feasible without any segmentation step. It is fast and accurate and could therefore be used before each treatment session. The method presents three main advantages for clinical implementation-it is fully automatic, applicable to all tumor sites, and requires no additional device.

[Target-volume and critical-organ delineation for conformal radiotherapy of prostate cancer: experience of French dose-escalation trials]

The delineation of target volume and organs at risk depends on the organs definition, and on the modalities for the CT-scan acquisition. Inter-observer variability in the delineation may be large, especially when patient's anatomy is unusual. During the two french multicentric studies of conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer, it was made an effort to harmonize the delineation of the target volumes and organs at risk. Two cases were proposed for delineation during two workshops. In the first case, the mean prostate volume was 46.5 mL (extreme: 31.7-61.3), the mean prostate and seminal vesicles volume was 74.7 mL (extreme: 59.6-80.3), the rectal and bladder walls varied respectively in proportion from 1 to 1.45 and from 1 to 1.16; in the second case, the mean prostate volume was 53.1 mL (extreme: 40.8-73.1), the volume of prostate plus seminal vesicles was 65.1 mL (extreme: 53.2-89), the rectal wall varied proportionally from 1 to 1, 24 and the vesical wall varied from 1 to 1.67. For participating centers to the french studies of dose escalation, a quality control of contours was performed to decrease the inter-observer variability. The ways to reduce the discrepancies of volumes delineation, between different observers, are discussed. A better quality of the CT images, use of urethral opacification, and consensual definition of clinical target volumes and organs at risk may contribute to that improvement.

Primary radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer

Prostate cancer in men is similar to breast cancer in women; both cancers rank first, respectively, in incidence and are normally responsive to radiation therapy. In addition, advances in mammography help detect earlier breast cancers, and the development and refinement of prostatic specific antigen (PSA) has resulted in early detection of low-stage localized prostate cancers. This has generated debate over the proper management of localized prostate cancer. While there have not been any controlled, prospective, randomized trials of sufficient power to compare the various local therapies, based on the current available data, the three commonly used local modalities, surgery, and external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy (radioactive seed implant), have similar efficacy controlling the disease up to 10 years in many patients. Technological advances in treatment delivery and planning have improved the treatment of prostate cancer with external-beam radiotherapy using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), ultrasound-guided transperineal implant, or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), as well as proton or neutron beam based therapies.

The use of a leg holder immobilisation device in 3D-conformal radiation therapy of prostate cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of a leg holder immobilisation device on patient positioning accuracy in the treatment of prostate cancer.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty patients of similar age and stage of disease treated with curative external beam radiotherapy for prostate cancer were included prospectively. Ten patients were sequentially allocated to one of the two groups, and treated either with or without a leg holder. Treatment set-up alignment accuracy was assessed with an electronic portal imaging device (EPID).

RESULTS

Set-up accuracy was 0.3, 0.3 and 0.2 cm for patients with a leg holder, and 0.3, 0.4 and 0.2 cm for patients without a leg holder in the cranio-caudal, anterior-posterior and in the lateral positions, respectively. The difference is not significant. The repositioning accuracy of combined (sagittal and lateral) in-plane rotations on the other hand, was significantly improved with a leg holder device (P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

Set-up accuracy can be improved using a leg holder immobilisation device in terms of rotational movement accuracy, thus making on-line corrections more accurate using EPID in the treatment of prostate cancer.

Conformal photon-beam radiotherapy of prostate carcinoma

Three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy is the recommended radiation technique for localized or locally advanced prostate cancer. In the past decades, external beam irradiation procedures have evolved in the context of technical developments of radiation and imaging equipment. The article summarizes these developments and gives a definition of new techniques and their potential advantages over conventional irradiation. It is meant to provide urologists and medical and radiation oncologists with a better comprehension of modern radiation treatment of prostate cancer and its possible improvements in the future.

Positioning errors and prostate motion during conformal prostate radiotherapy using on-line isocentre set-up verification and implanted prostate markers

PURPOSE

To evaluate treatment errors from set-up and inter-fraction prostatic motion with port films and implanted prostate fiducial markers during conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Errors from isocentre positioning and inter-fraction prostate motion were investigated in 13 men treated with escalated dose conformal radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. To limit the effect of inter-fraction prostate motion, patients were planned and treated with an empty rectum and a comfortably full bladder, and were instructed regarding dietary management, fluid intake and laxative use. Field placement was determined and corrected with daily on-line portal imaging. A lateral portal film was taken three times weekly over the course of therapy. From these films, random and systematic placement errors were measured by matching corresponding bony landmarks to the simulator film. Superior-inferior and anterior-posterior prostate motion was measured from the displacement of three gold pins implanted into the prostate before planning. A planning target volume (PTV) was derived to account for the measured prostate motion and field placement errors.

RESULTS

From 272 port films the random and systematic isocentre positioning error was 2.2 mm (range 0.2-7.3 mm) and 1.4 mm (range 0.2-3.3 mm), respectively. Prostate motion was largest at the base compared to the apex. Base: anterior, standard deviation (SD) 2.9 mm; superior, SD 2.1 mm. Apex: anterior, SD 2.1 mm; superior, SD 2.1 mm. The margin of PTV required to give a 99% probability of the gland remaining within the 95% isodose line during the course of therapy is superior 5.8 mm, and inferior 5.6 mm. In the anterior and posterior direction, this margin is 7.2 mm at the base, 6.5 mm at the mid-gland and 6.0 mm at the apex.

CONCLUSIONS

Systematic set-up errors were small using real-time isocentre placement corrections. Patient instruction to help control variation in bladder and rectal distension during therapy may explain the observed small SD for prostate motion in this group of patients. Inter-fraction prostate motion remained the largest source of treatment error, and observed motion was greatest at the gland base. In the absence of real-time pre-treatment imaging of prostate position, sequential portal films of implanted prostatic markers should improve quality assurance by confirming organ position within the treatment field over the course of therapy.

Immobilization devices for intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT)

Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3DCRT) and intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) plans show radiation dose distribution that is highly conformal to the target volume. The successful clinical implementation of these radiotherapy modalities requires precise positioning of the target to avoid a geographical miss. Effective reduction in target positional inaccuracies can be achieved with the proper use of immobilization devices. This paper reviews some of the immobilization devices that have been used and/or have the potential of being used for IMRT. The immobilization devices being reviewed include stereotactic frame, Talon system, thermoplastic molds, Alpha Cradles, and Vac-Lok system. The implementation of these devices at various anatomical sites is discussed.

Treatment planning aids in prostate cancer: friend or foe?

BACKGROUND

Rectal barium is commonly used as a treatment planning aid for prostate cancer to delineate the anterior rectal wall. Previous research at the Ottawa Regional Cancer Centre demonstrated that retrograde urethrography results in a systematic shift of the prostate. We postulated that rectal barium could also cause prostate motion.

PURPOSE

The study was designed to evaluate the effects of rectal barium on prostate position.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Thirty patients with cT1-T3 prostate cancer were evaluated. Three fiducial markers were placed in the prostate. During simulation, baseline posterior-anterior and lateral films were taken. Repeat films were taken after rectal barium opacification. The prostate position (identified by the fiducials) relative to bony landmarks was compared before and after rectal barium. Films were analyzed using PIPsPro software.

RESULTS

The rectal barium procedure resulted in a significant displacement of the prostate in the anterior and superior direction. The mean displacement of the prostate measured on the lateral films was 3.8 mm (SD: 4.4 mm) in the superior direction and 3.0 mm (SD: 3.1) in the anterior direction.

CONCLUSIONS

Rectal barium opacification results in a systematic shift of the prostate. This error could result in a geographic miss of the target; therefore, alternate methods of normal tissue definition should be used.

Effectiveness of couch height-based patient set-up and an off-line correction protocol in prostate cancer radiotherapy

PURPOSE

To investigate set-up improvement caused by applying a couch height-based patient set-up method in combination with a technologist-driven off-line correction protocol in nonimmobilized radiotherapy of prostate patients.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A three-dimensional shrinking action level correction protocol is applied in two consecutive patient cohorts with different set-up methods: the traditional "laser set-up" group (n = 43) and the "couch height set-up" group (n = 112). For all directions, left-right, ventro-dorsal, and cranio-caudal, random and systematic set-up deviations were measured.

RESULTS

The couch height set-up method improves the patient positioning compared to the laser set-up method. Without application of the correction protocol, both systematic and random errors reduced to 2.2-2.4 mm (1 SD) and 1.7-2.2 mm (1 SD), respectively. By using the correction protocol, systematic errors reduced further to 1.3-1.6 mm (1 SD). One-dimensional deviations were within 5 mm for >90% of the measured fractions. The required number of corrections per patient in the off-line correction protocol was reduced significantly during the course of treatment from 1.1 to 0.6 by the couch height set-up method. The treatment time was not prolonged by application of the correction protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

The couch height set-up method improves the set-up significantly, especially in the ventro-dorsal direction. Combination of this set-up method with an off-line correction strategy, executed by technologists, reduces the number of set-up corrections required.

Prostate volumes and organ movement defined by serial computerized tomographic scans during three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy

The aim of this study was to assess changes in prostate volumes and organ movement during a course of external beam irradiation using serial computerized tomographic (CT) scans and three-dimensional treatment planning software. Ten consenting prostate cancer patients underwent repeat CT scans at biweekly intervals during the course of external beam irradiation. The spacing of 5 mm was used because this spacing mimics our clinical treatment approach. Prostate locations were determined by merging CT images using bony anatomy and comparing the differences in the prostate volumes, the edges (anterior, posterior, superior, inferior, and lateral) and centers of the prostate (EoP and CoP, respectively). Compared to the 10 initial treatment planning CT scans, the prostate volume determined by the repeat CT scans tended to be smaller (approximately 14%, P < 0.001). The prostate volumes determined by repeat CT scans tended to be stable with a mean volume of 86% (S.D. = 18%) of the initial CT. When assessed by changes in the EoP, superior movements appeared to be the most common source for concern for adequate coverage of the prostate, while inferior movement was not seen. When assessed by changes in CoP, movement of > or = 3 mm was noted in 47% of the studies in the superior direction, with the average displacement being approximately 2.0 mm. In this study, the prostate volume tended to be smaller 2 weeks after the start of radiotherapy. Moreover, the prostate volumes defined by the serial CT scans were less reproducible than expected. Superior displacement of the prostate is the most common and significant type of displacement, while inferior movement is least frequent when patients are simulated with their rectums empty. Because of the magnitude of daily setup errors, organ movement, and problems with reproducibility in target definition, additional field edge reductions do not appear to be warranted during the delivery of three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy. Efforts should be directed at improving our ability to reduce organ movement and accurately targeting the prostate.

Influence of a vac-fix immobilization device on the accuracy of patient positioning during routine breast radiotherapy

Continued use of basic planning and treatment techniques, in contrast to the improved methods implemented at many other anatomical sites, has emphasized the need for improved breast dosimetry. Any future technique delivering a superior three-dimensional dose distribution will be of maximum benefit if set-up errors are minimized. To determine the influence of vacuum moulded bag (vac-fix) immobilization on routine breast radiotherapy, 17 patients received half their radiotherapy fractions using our standard breast board technique and half using a vac-fix device positioned on the breast board. Treatment accuracy and reproducibility were assessed for each technique using daily electronic portal imaging and were analysed in terms of random and systematic translational and rotational displacements of treatment fields with respect to corresponding simulation images. In addition, patients completed a short questionnaire aimed at determining which technique they preferred. Results showed that random errors for the two techniques did not differ significantly. Approximately 80% of random translations recorded were less than 3 mm and 80% of random rotations were less than 1.5 degrees. Systematic errors showed some improvement with the vac-fix system. In the anteroposterior direction, approximately 80% of systematic errors were less than 4 mm for both techniques, but in the superoinferior direction the 80% point was reduced from 5.0 mm for the standard set-up to 2.7 mm for treatment in vac-fix. For rotational systematic errors, the corresponding value dropped from 1.8 degrees for the standard set-up to 1.1 degrees in vac-fix. Therefore, for many patients, additional use of a vac-fix device improved the transfer of the planned set-up from simulator to treatment unit. Additionally, answers to the questionnaire indicated that patients generally favoured the vac-fix system over use of the breast board alone. In conclusion, however, introduction of vac-fix immobilization for all patients was not thought justified as the improvements demonstrated are not likely to be clinically significant with the present treatment technique.

Portal imaging for evaluation of daily on-line setup errors and off-line organ motion during conformal irradiation of carcinoma of the prostate

PURPOSE

To use portal imaging to measure daily on-line setup error and off-line prostatic motion in patients treated with conformal radiotherapy to determine an optimum planning target volume (PTV) margin incorporating both setup error and organ motion.

RESULTS

A total of 2549 portal images from 33 patients were acquired over the course of the study. Of these patients, 23 were analyzed for setup errors while the remaining 10 were analyzed for prostatic motion. Setup errors were characterized by standard deviations of 1.8 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) direction and 1.4 mm in the superior-inferior (SI) direction. Displacements due to prostatic motion, with standard deviations of 5.8 mm AP and 3.3 mm SI, were found to be more significant than setup errors.

CONCLUSIONS

Taking into account both setup errors and target organ motion, optimum PTV margins to ensure 95% coverage are 10.0 mm AP and 5.9 mm SI. The portal imaging protocol established in this study allows radiation therapists to accept or adjust a treatment setup based upon daily on-line image matching results. The successful localization of radiopaque fiducial markers on a significant number of portal images acquired in the study gives hope that more accurate on-line targeting verification may soon be possible through the visualization of the prostate itself as opposed to the surrounding bony structures of the pelvis.

Set-up verification using portal imaging; review of current clinical practice

In this review of current clinical practice of set-up error verification by means of portal imaging, we firstly define the various types of set-up errors using a consistent nomenclature. The different causes of set-up errors are then summarized. Next, the results of a large number of studies regarding patient set-up verification are presented for treatments of patients with head and neck, prostate, pelvis, lung and breast cancer, as well as for mantle field/total body treatments. This review focuses on the more recent studies in order to assess the criteria for good clinical practice in patient positioning. The reported set-up accuracy varies widely, depending on the treatment site, method of immobilization and institution. The standard deviation (1 SD, mm) of the systematic and random errors for currently applied treatment techniques, separately measured along the three principle axes, ranges from 1.6-4.6 and 1.1-2.5 (head and neck), 1.0-3.8 and 1.2-3.5 (prostate), 1.1-4.7 and 1.1-4.9 (pelvis), 1.8-5.1 and 2.2-5.4 (lung), and 1.0-4.7 and 1.7-14.4 (breast), respectively. Recommendations for procedures to quantify, report and reduce patient set-up errors are given based on the studies described in this review. Using these recommendations, the systematic and random set-up errors that can be achieved in routine clinical practice can be less than 2.0 mm (1 SD) for head and neck, 2.5 mm (1 SD) for prostate, 3.0 mm (1 SD) for general pelvic and 3.5 mm (1 SD) for lung cancer treatment techniques.

A prospective comparison of three systems of patient immobilization for prostate radiotherapy

PURPOSE

The study compared the setup reliability of 3 patient immobilization systems, a rubber leg cushion, the alpha cradle, and the thermoplastic Hipfix device, in 77 patients with cT1-T3, N0, M0 prostate cancer receiving conformal radiotherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Port films were analyzed and compared to simulation films to estimate the setup errors in the three coordinate axes (anterior-posterior, cranial-caudal, medial-lateral). A total vector error was calculated from these shifts.

RESULTS

The Hipfix was found significantly superior to the other two devices in reducing mean setup errors in all axes (p < 0.005). The average field-positioning error with the Hipfix ranged from 1.9 mm to 2.6 mm for all axes, whereas the deviation for the other two systems ranged from 2.7 to 3. 4 mm. Errors greater than 10 mm were virtually eliminated with the Hipfix system. There was a reduction in the mean total vector error in the alpha cradle and Hipfix patient cohorts over time, reflecting improved efficacy as a result of experience.

CONCLUSION

There was a significant difference in the performance of each immobilization device. The Hipfix was consistently more reliable in reducing setup errors than the other devices.

A clinical evaluation of setup errors for a prostate immobilization system

A prostate treatment immobilization system was evaluated with respect to setup errors and efficiency for a specific treatment setup. Prostate patients were treated in the prone position with a rectal catheter using the NOMOS intensity modulated radiotherapy system. Immobilization and setup consisted of a Vac-Loktrade mark bag (MED-TEC, Orange City, IO) fitted within a registration carrier box where patients were aligned to the bag using skin marks along the lower leg. Daily setup errors were analyzed using lateral portal films, registration plates mounted to the carrier box, and the pubic symphasis as a bony reference. Two studies were conducted to evaluate setup technique. In the first study, patient setup required 3-5 minutes for patient positioning and the corresponding superior/inferior errors were found to have a standard deviation of 3.5 mm. In the second study, the technique standards were reduced to allow for faster setup times and, consequently, larger errors; setup times were 1-2 minutes and the mean and standard deviation errors were approximately 2 and 5 mm, respectively.

Respiratory-induced prostate motion: quantification and characterization

PURPOSE

The precise localization of the prostate is critical for dose-escalated conformal radiotherapy. This study identifies and characterizes a potential cause of inaccurate prostatic localization-respiratory-induced movement.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Prostate movement during respiration was measured fluoroscopically using implanted gold fiducial markers. Twenty sequential patients with CT(1)-T(3) N(0) M(0) prostate carcinoma were evaluated prone, immobilized in customized thermoplastic shells. A second 20 patients were evaluated both prone (with and without their thermoplastic shells) and supine (without their shells).

RESULTS

When the patients were immobilized prone in thermoplastic shells, the prostate moved synchronously with respiration. In the study the prostate was displaced a mean distance of 3.3 +/- 1.8 (SD) mm (range, 1-10.2 mm), with 23% (9/40) of the displacements being 4 mm or greater. The respiratory-associated prostate movement decreased significantly when the thermoplastic shells were removed.

CONCLUSION

Significant prostate movement can be induced by respiration when patients are immobilized in thermoplastic shells. This movement presumably is related to transmitted intraabdominal pressure within the confined space of the shells. Careful attention to the details of immobilization and to the possibility of respiratory-induced prostate movements is important when employing small field margins in prostatic radiotherapy.

[Immobilization devices in conformal radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer]

When considering three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer, the uncertainties about treatment can be quite significant, due to set-up errors and organ or tumor motion. These can be important causes of treatment failure. Immobilization devices have only been studied recently in a scientific manner in the domain of chest tumors, presumably because other factors such as tumor motion were felt to be more important causes of treatment uncertainties. An international survey on immobilization devices in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer has shown that about half of the centers are using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, and among these, only two-thirds use immobilization devices on a routine basis. Very few use internal fiducials. Current data on set-up errors show that the average discrepancy is about 5 mm, but in some cases it can be more than 15 mm. A recent study has demonstrated that less positioning corrections during treatments were needed for the patients who were immobilized. Another work indicates that there were no differences between a T-bar immobilization device and a system using chemical foams. Other works indicate that internal motion of bronchial tumors can vary greatly, depending on their location. A number of clinical groups are looking at minimizing the consequences of internal motion, but the currently proposed techniques appear to be cumbersome. New studies will be necessary in order to improve the knowledge of daily positioning and the effect of internal motion. Until then, it is essential to take care when considering narrow margins in conformal radiotherapy of non-small cell lung cancer.

Patient positioning in prostate radiotherapy: is prone better than supine?

PURPOSE

To assess potential dose reductions to the rectum and to the bladder with three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3D-CRT) to the prostate in the prone as compared with the supine position; and to retrospectively evaluate treatment position reproducibility without immobilization devices.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Eighteen patients with localized prostate cancer underwent pelvic CT scans and 3D treatment planning in prone and supine positions. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were constructed for the clinical target volume, the rectum and the bladder for every patient in both treatment positions. "Comparative DVHs" (cDVHs) were defined for the rectum and for the bladder: cDVH was obtained by subtracting the organ volume receiving a given dose increment in the prone position from the corresponding value in the supine position. These values were then integrated over the entire dose range. The prescribed dose to the planning target volume (PTV) was 74 Gy using a 6-field technique. To evaluate reproducibility, portal films were subsequently reviewed in 12 patients treated prone and 10 contemporary patients treated supine (controls). No immobilization devices were used. Deviations in the anterio-posterior (X) and cranio-caudal (Y) axes were measured. Mean treatment position variation, total setup variation, systematic setup variation, and random setup variation were obtained.

RESULTS

Prone position was associated with a higher dose to the rectum or to the bladder in 6 (33%) and 7 (39%) patients, respectively. A simultaneously higher dose to rectum and bladder was noted in 2 (11%) patients in prone and in 7 (39%) patients in supine. Rectal and bladder volumes were frequently larger in prone than in supine: mean prone/supine volume ratios were 1.21 (SD, 0.68) and 1.03 (SD, 1.32), respectively. In these cases cDVH analysis more often favored the prone position. Mean treatment position variation and total setup variation were similar for both prone and supine plans. A higher systematic setup variation was observed in prone positioning: 2.7 mm vs. 1.9 mm (X axis) and 4.1 mm vs. 2.2 mm (Y axis). The random variation was similar for both prone and supine: 4. 0 mm vs. 3.6 mm (X axis) and 3.7 mm vs. 3.6 mm (Y axis).

CONCLUSIONS

Prone position 3D-CRT is frequently, but not always, associated with an apparent dose reduction to the rectum and/or to the bladder for prostate cancer patients. As suggested by the increased mean prone/supine rectal volume ratio, the advantage of prone positioning for the rectum may be artifactual, at least partly reflecting a position-dependent rectal air volume, which may significantly vary from treatment to treatment. In the absence of immobilization devices, daily setup reproducibility appears less accurate for the prone position, primarily due to systematic setup variations.