Treatment-related symptoms during the first year following transperineal 125I prostate implantation

Retrograde ejaculation, painful ejaculation and hematospermia

Although there has been an increased interest on premature ejaculation in the recent years, our understanding regarding the disorders of retrograde ejaculation, painful ejaculation and hematospermia remain limited. All three of these conditions require a keen clinical acumen and willingness to engage in thinking outside of the standard established treatment paradigm. The development of novel investigational techniques and treatments has led to progress in the management of these conditions symptoms; however, the literature almost uniformly is limited to small series and rare randomised trials. Further investigation and randomised controlled trials are needed for progress in these often challenging cases.

Difference in the rate of rectal complications following prostate brachytherapy based on the prostate-rectum distance and the prostate longitudinal length among early prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

To investigate the difference in rectal complications rate following prostate low dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy based on prostate-rectum distance and prostate longitudinal length among early prostate cancer patients.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From March 2008 to February 2013, 245 prostate cancer patients with a Gleason score ≤7 were treated with 125-I LDR brachytherapy. Among them, 178 patients with prostate volume 20-35 mL and a follow-up period ≥6 months were evaluated for radiation proctitis. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed for a prebrachytherapy evaluation, and prostate-rectum distance and prostate longitudinal length were measured. The radiation proctitis was confirmed and graded via colonoscopy based on the radiation therapy oncology group (RTOG) toxicity criteria.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients received a colonoscopy for proctitis evaluation, and 12 were identified as grade 1 on the RTOG scale. Nine patients were diagnosed as grade 2 and 2 patients were grade 3. No patient developed grade 4 proctitis. The rectal-complication group had a mean prostate-rectum distance of 2.51±0.16 mm, while non-rectal-complication control group had 3.32±0.31 mm. The grade 1 proctitis patients had a mean prostate-rectum distance of 2.80±0.15 mm, which was significantly longer than 2.12±0.31 mm of grades 2 and 3 patient groups (p=0.045). All 11 patients of grades 2 and 3 had a prostate longitudinal length of 35.22±2.50 mm, which was longer than group 1, but the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.214).

CONCLUSIONS

As the prostate-rectum distance increased, fewer postimplantation rectal symptoms were observed. Patients with a shorter prostate-rectum distance in MRI should receive modified implantation techniques or radical prostatectomy.

Dysuria Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer

Background

Dysuria following prostate radiation therapy is a common toxicity that adversely affects patients’ quality of life and may be difficult to manage.

Methods

Two hundred four patients treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) from 2007 to 2010 for localized prostate carcinoma with a minimum follow-up of 3 years were included in this retrospective review of prospectively collected data. All patients were treated to 35–36.25 Gy in five fractions delivered with robotic SBRT with real time fiducial tracking. Dysuria and other lower urinary tract symptoms were assessed via Question 4b (Pain or burning on urination) of the expanded prostate index composite-26 and the American Urological Association (AUA) Symptom Score at baseline and at routine follow-up.

Results

Two hundred four patients (82 low-, 105 intermediate-, and 17 high-risk according to the D’Amico classification) at a median age of 69 years (range 48–91) received SBRT for their localized prostate cancer with a median follow-up of 47 months. Bother associated with dysuria significantly increased from a baseline of 12% to a maximum of 43% at 1 month (p < 0.0001). There were two distinct peaks of moderate to severe dysuria bother at 1 month and at 6–12 months, with 9% of patients experiencing a late transient dysuria flare. While a low level of dysuria was seen through the first 2 years of follow-up, it returned to below baseline by 2 years (p = 0.91). The median baseline AUA score of 7.5 significantly increased to 11 at 1 month (p < 0.0001) and returned to 7 at 3 months (p = 0.54). Patients with dysuria had a statistically higher AUA score at baseline and at all follow-ups up to 30 months. Dysuria significantly correlated with dose and AUA score on multivariate analysis. Frequency and strain significantly correlated with dysuria on stepwise multivariate analysis.

Conclusion

The rate and severity of dysuria following SBRT is comparable to patients treated with other radiation modalities.

[Surgical treatment of rectourinary fistulas: review of the literature]

BACKGROUND

A rectourethral fistula (RUF) is an uncommon complication resulting from surgery, radiation, or trauma. Retrospective studies and case reports have highlighted different approaches for surgical repair.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to review our experience with surgical management of RUF.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (PubMed, Ovid) and the Cochrane Library were searched by using the terms RUFs urethrorectal fistulas, and prostatourethral-rectal fistulas.

STUDY SELECTION

All studies were retrospective and in English. Of the records identified, 31 series were included.

RESULTS

Four hundred sixty-five patients were identified. Most patients underwent one of four categories of repair: transanal (4.7%), transabdominal (14.1%), transsphincteric (26.6%), and transperineal (57.6%). Tissue interposition flaps, predominantly gracilis muscle, were used in 56% of repairs. The fistula was successfully closed in 93.9% of patients.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of complexity, RUFs have an initial closure rate of 93.9%.

Late rectal toxicity after low-dose-rate brachytherapy: incidence, predictors, and management of side effects

As clinical outcomes for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer continue to improve, patients and physicians are increasing making treatment decisions based on concerns regarding long-term morbidity. A primary concern is late radiation proctitis, a clinical entity embodied by various signs and symptoms, ranging from diarrhea to rectal fistulas. Here, we present a comprehensive literature review examining the clinical manifestations and pathophysiology of late radiation proctitis after low-dose-rate brachytherapy (BT), as well as its incidence and predictors. The long-term risks of rectal bleeding after BT are on the order of 5-7%, whereas the risks of severe ulceration or fistula are on the order of 0.6%. The most robust predictor appears to be the volume of rectum receiving the prescription dose. In certain situations (e.g., salvage setting, for patients with increased radiosensitivity, and following aggressive biopsy after BT), the risk of these severe toxicities may be increased by up to 10-fold. A variety of excellent management options exist for rectal bleeding, with endoscopic methods being the most commonly used.

Acquired rectourethral fistulas in adults: a systematic review of surgical repair techniques and outcomes

BACKGROUND

Rectourethral fistulas are uncommon. Retrospective studies and case reports have highlighted various approaches for surgical repair. Because clinical presentations and technical expertise vary widely, no single procedure has been universally adopted.

OBJECTIVE

We sought to qualitatively analyze studies describing surgical techniques and outcomes in adult acquired rectourethral fistulas to outline universal approaches for evaluation and management.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE (PubMed, Ovid) and the Cochrane Library were searched by using the terms rectourethral fistulas, recto-urethral fistulas, urethrorectal fistulas, and prostatourethral-rectal fistulas.

STUDY SELECTION

All studies were retrospective, in English, and reported at least 4 cases. Any series with >50% congenital cases or <50% adults (19+ years) was excluded. Of the 569 records identified, 26 articles were included.

INTERVENTION

The intervention was surgical repair of rectourethral fistula.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

The main outcome measures were successful fistula closure, fistula recurrence or persistence, and permanent fecal and/or urinary diversion.

RESULTS

Four hundred sixteen patients were identified, including 169 (40%) who had previous pelvic irradiation and/or ablation. Most patients (90%) underwent 1 of 4 categories of repair: transanal (5.9%), transabdominal (12.5%), transsphincteric (15.7%), and transperineal (65.9%). Tissue interposition flaps, predominantly gracilis muscle, were used in 72% of repairs. The fistula was successfully closed in 87.5%. Overall permanent fecal and/or urinary diversion rates were 10.6% and 8.3%. Most high-volume centers (≥25 patients) performed transperineal repairs with tissue flaps in 100% of cases.

LIMITATIONS

This review was limited by the heterogeneity of repairs and bias toward preferred surgical approaches in single-center studies.

CONCLUSIONS

Regardless of complexity, rectourethral fistulas have an initial closure rate approaching 90% when the transperineal approach is used. Permanent fecal and/or urinary diversion should be a last resort in patients with devastated, nonfunctional fecal and urinary systems.

Comparison of template-matching and singular-spectrum-analysis methods for imaging implanted brachytherapy seeds

Brachytherapy using small implanted radioactive seeds is becoming an increasingly popular method for treating prostate cancer, in which a radiation oncologist implants seeds in the prostate transperineally under ultrasound guidance. Dosimetry software determines the optimal placement of seeds for achieving the prescribed dose based on ultrasonic determination of the gland boundaries. However, because of prostate movement and distortion during the implantation procedure, some seeds may not be placed in the desired locations; this causes the delivered dose to differ from the prescribed dose. Current ultrasonic imaging methods generally cannot depict the implanted seeds accurately. We are investigating new ultrasonic imaging methods that show promise for enhancing the visibility of seeds and thereby enabling real-time detection and correction of seed-placement errors during the implantation procedure. Real-time correction of seed-placement errors will improve the therapeutic radiation dose delivered to target tissues. In this work, we compare the potential performance of a template-matching method and a previously published method based on singular spectrum analysis for imaging seeds. In particular, we evaluated how changes in seed angle and position relative to the ultrasound beam affect seed detection. The conclusion of the present study is that singular spectrum analysis has better sensitivity but template matching is more resistant to false positives; both perform well enough to make seed detection clinically feasible over a relevant range of angles and positions. Combining the information provided by the two methods may further reduce ambiguities in determining where seeds are located.

Prophylactic urethral stenting with Memokath® 028SW in prostate cancer patients undergoing prostate 125I seed implants: phase I/II study

Purpose

To study the feasibility/toxicity of urethral stenting with the Memokath^® 028SW stent in patients undergoing prostate implant (PI) for prostate adenocarcinoma.

Material and methods

An Investigational Device Exemption from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and institutional review board (IRB) approval were obtained. Twenty patients enrolled. Baseline American Urological Association (AUA) score was obtained prior to PI. Follow-up information was obtained with weekly phone calls for the first 12 weeks and biweekly calls for the next 12 weeks to assess toxicity and AUA score. Removal of the stent was planned at six months after PI, or earlier due to excessive toxicity/patient request.

Results

Median age was 66.5 years. The median prostate volume was 39 cc (range: 10-90). The median baseline AUA score was 7.5 (range: 1-21). Three patients required intermittent self-catheterization (ISC) within 3 days after PI. No patients required ISC beyond day 3 after PI. The median duration of ISC was 1 day (range: 1-2). AUA scores returned to baseline values 6 weeks after PI. The week 6 AUA score was 10 (range: 4-16). Seven patients (35%) underwent early removal because of patient preference. The reasons were: incontinence (n = 3), discomfort (n = 2), hematuria (n = 1), and obstructive symptoms (n = 1). The median time of stent removal in these patients was 13.9 weeks (range: 0.9-21.4). Thirteen patients (65%) had ISC and/or urinary catheterization post stent removal. Median time for ISC use was 10 days (range: 1-90).

Conclusions

Urethral stenting with Memokath^® in patients undergoing PI was feasible, but resulted in relatively high rate of urinary incontinence and discomfort. Given the adverse effects experienced by patients of this study, further studies should focus only on patients with highest risk of urinary obstruction from PI or those with obstruction needing ISC.

Late rectal complications after prostate brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer: incidence and management

This review of the literature on late rectal complications after prostate brachytherapy indicated that it is a highly effective treatment modality for patients with clinically localized prostate cancer but can cause chronic radiation proctitis. The most common manifestation of chronic radiation proctitis was anterior rectal wall bleeding, which often occurred within the first 2 years after brachytherapy. It is interesting to note that the rates of late rectal morbidity appear to have declined over time, which may reflect improvements in implantation techniques and imaging. Rectal biopsy as part of the workup to evaluate rectal bleeding can lead to rectal fistula and the need for colostomy, a rare but major complication. The authors recommend 1) screening colonoscopy before brachytherapy for patients who have not had a screening colonoscopy within the preceding 3 years to rule out colorectal malignancies and, thus, facilitate conservative management should rectal bleeding occur; 2) lifestyle modifications during treatment to limit exposure of the rectum to radiation; and 3) conservative management for rectal bleeding that occurs within 2 years after brachytherapy. Cancer 2009. (c) 2009 American Cancer Society.

Early Prostate Cancer: Hedonic Prices Model of Provider–Patient Interactions and Decisions

PURPOSE

To determine the relative influence of treatment features and treatment availabilities on final treatment decisions in early prostate cancer.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

We describe and apply a model, based on hedonic prices, to understand provider-patient interactions in prostate cancer. This model included four treatments (observation, external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, and prostatectomy) and five treatment features (one efficacy and four treatment complication features). We performed a literature search to estimate (1) the intersections of the "bid" functions and "offer" functions with the price function along different treatment feature axes, and (2) the treatments actually rendered in different patient subgroups based on age. We performed regressions to determine the relative weight of each feature in the overall interaction and the relative availability of each treatment modality to explain differences between observed vs. predicted use of different modalities in different patient subpopulations.

RESULTS

Treatment efficacy and potency preservation are the major factors influencing decisions for young patients, whereas preservation of urinary and rectal function is much more important for very elderly patients. Referral patterns seem to be responsible for most of the deviations of observed use of different treatments from those predicted by idealized provider-patient interactions. Specifically, prostatectomy is used far more commonly in young patients and radiotherapy and observation used far more commonly in elderly patients than predicted by a uniform referral pattern.

CONCLUSIONS

The hedonic prices approach facilitated identifying the relative importance of treatment features and quantification of the impact of the prevailing referral pattern on prostate cancer treatment decisions.

Barriers to pain assessment and management in cancer survivorship

INTRODUCTION

Healthcare providers frequently lack the knowledge and skills to provide optimal pain management for cancer survivors. Scientific evidence and clinical guidelines are lacking in the management of chronic, persistent pain in survivors. The purpose of this article is to describe pain-related issues of cancer survivors using case presentations of selected patients enrolled in a randomized trial to eliminate barriers to pain management.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Case presentations were selected from a National Cancer Institute-funded study that utilizes patient and professional educational content derived from the clinical guidelines of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network. Case presentation criteria included a pain rating of >or=6 and diagnosis of Stage I, II, or III of the following cancers: breast, colon, lung, or prostate cancer. Cases are presented based on the study's framework of patient, professional, and system-related barriers to optimal pain relief.

RESULTS

Across all three case presentations, barriers such as fear of side effects from pain medications, fear of addiction, lack of professional knowledge of the basic principles of pain management, and lack of timely access to pain medications due to reimbursement issues are prevalent in cancer survivorship.

CONCLUSIONS

Chronic pain syndromes related to cancer treatments are common in cancer survivors. Patient, professional, and system-related barriers that are seen during active treatment continue to hinder optimal pain relief during survivorship.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS

Healthcare providers must acknowledge the impact of chronic, persistent pain on the quality of cancer survivorship. Clinical as well as scientific efforts to increase knowledge in chronic pain management will improve the symptom management of cancer survivors.

Transperineal injection of hyaluronic acid in anterior perirectal fat to decrease rectal toxicity from radiation delivered with intensity modulated brachytherapy or EBRT for prostate cancer patients

PURPOSE

Rectal toxicity remains a serious complication affecting quality of life for prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy. We began an investigational trial injecting hyaluronic acid (HA) in the perirectal fat to increase the distance between the prostate and the anterior rectal wall. This is the first report using HA injection in oncology.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

This is a trial of external beam radiation therapy with HDR brachytherapy boosts in prostate cancer. During the two high-dose-rate (HDR) fractions, thermoluminescent dosimeter dosimeters were placed in the urethra and in the rectum. Before the second HDR fraction, 3-7 mL (mean, 6 mL) of HA was injected under transrectal ultrasound guidance in the perirectal fat to systematically create a 1.5-cm space. Urethral and rectal HDR doses were calculated and measured. Computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging were used to assess the stability of the new space.

RESULTS

Twenty-seven patients enrolled in the study. No toxicity was produced from the HA or the injection. In follow-up computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging, the HA injection did not migrate or change in mass/shape for close to 1 year. The mean distance between rectum and prostate was 2.0 cm along the entire length of the prostate. The median measured rectal dose, when normalized to the median urethral dose, demonstrated a decrease in dose from 47.1% to 39.2% (p < 0.001) with or without injection. For an HDR boost dose of 1150 cGy, the rectum mean Dmax reduction was from 708 cGy to 507 cGy, p < 0.001, and the rectum mean Dmean drop was from 608 to 442 cGy, p < 0.001 post-HA injection.

CONCLUSION

The new 2-cm distance derived from the HA injection significantly decreased rectal dose in HDR brachytherapy. Because of the several-month duration of stability, the same distance was maintained during the course of external beam radiation therapy.

Ejaculatory disorders may affect screening for prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Ejaculatory disorders will be experienced in most men who are treated for localized prostate cancer. Baseline rates of ejaculatory disorders are unknown in men at risk for prostate cancer. Therefore, we explored the prevalence of those disorders and associated bother in men without evidence of prostate cancer who participated in an annual prostate cancer screening event.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

A cohort of 1,273 men without clinical evidence of prostate cancer completed the self-administered Danish Prostate Symptom Score for sexual dysfunction. This questionnaire quantifies the rate of reduced ejaculatory volume, ejaculatory pain and the rate of coexistent erectile dysfunction.

RESULTS

Mean age was 57.6 years (range 40 to 89). Of all men 46% (563) had reduced ejaculatory volume and 66% (356) of affected men were bothered by this condition. Ejaculatory pain was reported in 11% (134) and 89% (118) of these men reported associated bother. Finally, 45% (554) reported erectile dysfunction and 73% (403) reported associated bother. Reduced ejaculatory volume was associated with erectile dysfunction (p<0.001) and advanced age (p<0.001). Ejaculatory pain was not associated with one of these variables.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtually all men will be affected by ejaculatory disorders after definitive treatment for localized prostate cancer. Therefore, it is important to observe that half of these individuals already have underlying reduced ejaculatory volume before treatment. Moreover, 1 of 10 men will be affected by ejaculatory pain. Both disorders are a significant source of bother and should be considered when treatment related quality of life is assessed.

Techniques, indications et résultats de la curiethérapie interstitielle par implants permanents dans le cancer localisé de la prostate

Permanent seed brachytherapy as a monotherapy is an appropriate treatment in patients with low risk localized prostate cancer such as intraprostatic cancer, T1-2 stage, PSA less than 10 ng/mL, low tumour volume, well differentiated cancer (Gleason score less than 7), gland size less than 50 mL, no micturition symptoms that could decompensate after implantation. A brachytherapy program needs a specialized multidisciplinary team with the collaboration of urologists, radiotherapists (authorized person to manipulate radioactive elements), and physicists. The 10-year oncologic and morbidity results have been published in the literature and are comparable to those of other standard treatments of localized prostate cancer such as radical prostatectomy and external beam radiation therapy.

Chronic Pain in the Cancer Survivor: A New Frontier

OBJECTIVE

This monograph is intended to clarify the clinical problem of chronic pain in cancer patients.

DESIGN

A pertinent literature review on chronic pain syndromes in cancer patients was undertaken using Medline. Further, the treatment strategies for cancer versus chronic pain are contrasted and clarified.

RESULTS

With increasing cancer survivorship come new challenges in patient care. In the United States, the cancer-related death rate has dropped by 1.1% per year from 1993-2002. Seventy-five percent of children and two out of three adults will survive cancer, whereas 50 years ago just one out of four survived. The net effect of these trends and opportunities is a large and rapidly growing population of persons living longer with cancer and/or as cancer survivors. While agreement exists on the best strategies for assessment and treatment of most acute cancer pain syndromes, little consensus exists on the treatment of chronic pain in the patient with slowly progressive cancer or the cancer survivor.

CONCLUSIONS

The landscape of "cancer pain" is shifting quickly into a chronic pain situation in many instances, thereby blurring previous lines of distinction in treatment strategies most suited for "chronic" versus "malignant" pain. Adopting chronic pain treatment strategies including pharmacologic and other pain control techniques, rehabilitation care, and psychological coping strategies may lead to optimal outcomes. Lastly, as cancer evolves into a chronic illness, with co-morbid conditions, recurrent cancer, and treatment toxicities from repeated antineoplastic therapies, pain management challenges in the oncologic patient continue to increase in complexity.

Overdiagnosis and overtreatment of early detected prostate cancer

Early detection of prostate cancer is associated with the diagnosis of a considerable proportion of cancers that are indolent, and that will hardly ever become symptomatic during lifetime. Such overdiagnosis should be avoided in all forms of screening because of potential adverse psychological and somatic side effects. The main threat of overdiagnosis is overtreatment of indolent disease. Men with prostate cancer that is likely to be indolent may be offered active surveillance. Evaluation of active surveillance studies and validation of new biological parameters for risk assessment are expected.

Prospective evaluation of quality of life after interstitial brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

PURPOSE

Permanent interstitial brachytherapy (IB) has become an increasingly appealing therapeutic option for localized prostate cancer (LPC) among physicians and patients because it involves short hospitalization and treatment and its postulated low degree of toxicity may reduce its impact on the patients' quality of life (QoL). The aim of this prospective study was to assess the impact of IB on the QoL of patients with LPC.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A validated self-completed questionnaire was administered to the patients before and after IB and then at yearly intervals. The items allowed the identification of seven subscales exploring physical well-being (PHY), physical autonomy (POW), psychological well-being (PSY), relational life (REL), urinary function (URI), rectal function (REC), and sexual function (SEX).

RESULTS

The assessment of the QoL of 147 patients treated between May 2000 and February 2005 revealed no relevant differences in the PHY scale scores 1 month after IB or later, and the same was true of the POW, PSY, and REL scales. Urinary function significantly worsened after IB and returned to pretreatment levels only after 3 years; the impact of the treatment on the URI scale was greater in the patients with good baseline urinary function than in those presenting more urinary symptoms before IB. Rectal and sexual functions were significantly worse only at the post-IB evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of the present study confirm that the impact of IB on the patients' QoL is low despite its transient negative effects on some function, and extend existing knowledge concerning QoL after IB.

Prediction of Urinary Symptoms After 125Iodine Prostate Brachytherapy

AIMS

To evaluate the post-treatment urinary morbidity experienced by a cohort of men undergoing ultrasound-based transperineal prostate brachytherapy, as monotherapy for early stage carcinoma of the prostate.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred and thirty-four consecutive patients received prostate brachytherapy between March 2000 and July 2002, and were asked to complete the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression (HAD) questionnaires before treatment and at 1, 3, 6, 9, 12 and 18 months after implant. Data on catheterisation and surgical interventions were also recorded. Pre-treatment IPSS, dosimetry and other variables were analysed in relation to catheterisation rates and post-treatment IPSS scores at each time window.

RESULTS

One hundred and eleven patients returned sufficient data for meaningful analysis. Of the patients who completed IPSS at 1 month, 85 (97%) reported deterioration in IPSS scores. This peak of symptoms, identified by a rise in median IPSS, started to improve by 3 months, and was approaching baseline by 18 months. The only significant determinants of early urinary toxicity were pre-treatment IPSS, pre-treatment prostate volume and the difficulty of implant. However, prostate volume was not significant beyond 1 month. Twenty-six patients required catheterisation at a median of 10 days after implant. Significant predictors of urinary retention were pre-treatment prostate volume and pre-treatment IPSS. Patients requiring catheterisation continued to have significantly higher IPSS at 18 months than patients who had never required a catheter.

CONCLUSION

Brachytherapy was generally well tolerated, with urinary toxicity in most patients persisting for at least 3-6 months after prostate brachytherapy. Those whose pre-treatment prostate volume and IPSS were high experienced more severe urinary symptoms in the first few months.

The efficacy of conventional external beam, three-dimensional conformal, intensity-modulated, particle beam radiation, and brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer

Technologic advances in radiation treatment planning and delivery have generated popular interest in the different radiation therapy techniques used in treating patients with localized prostate cancer. Throughout the past decade, high-energy (> 4 MV) linear accelerators have largely replaced Cobalt machines in external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) delivery. Conventional EBRT has been used to treat prostate cancer successfully since the 1950s. By switching to computed tomography-based planning, three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy provides better relative conformality of dose than does conventional EBRT. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) has further refined dose conformality by spreading the low-dose region to a larger volume. However, the potential long-term risks of larger volumes of normal tissues receiving low doses of radiation in IMRT are unknown. Particle-beam radiation therapy offers unique dose distributions and characteristics with higher relative biologic effect and linear energy transfer. Transperineal prostate brachytherapy offers the shortest treatment time with equivalent efficacy without significant risk of radiation exposure. The addition of hormonal therapy to radiation therapy has been shown to improve the outcome of radiation therapy.

High Dose Rate (HDR) Brachytherapy with Conformal Radiation Therapy for Localized Prostate Cancer

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the outcome of high dose rate (HDR) brachytherapy with iridium 192 (Ir(192)) and 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy in patients with localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

A total of 442 patients with localized prostate cancer underwent combined radiotherapy with interstitial brachytherapy with Ir(192) and 3D conformal external beam radiotherapy between December 1992 and March 2001. Patients underwent laparoscopic pelvic lymph node dissection to exclude patients with lymphatic involvement. Iridium 192 was delivered twice with a one-week interval in afterloading technique. 247 patients (56%) had clinical T3 disease and 128 patients (29%) had an initial PSA of more than 20 ng/ml. Progression was defined as biochemical failure according to ASTRO criteria. Patients were divided according to pretreatment variables that independently affected prostate-specific antigen (PSA) relapse-free survival in three risk groups. Low risk was defined as cT1c-cT2 and G1-G2 and PSA<10 ng/ml (n=94). Intermediate risk included patients with cT1c-cT2 and G1-G2 and PSA between 10 and 20 ng/ml (n=53). High risk group patients were cT3 or G3 or PSA>20 ng/ml (n=295).

RESULTS

Median follow-up was 5 years. Late grade 3-4 complications according to RTOG/EORTC criteria occurred in 50 patients (11%). The initial PSA value decreased from median 11.8 ng/ml to 0.98 ng/ml 12 months after treatment, to 0.3 ng/ml after 60 months and to 0.1 ng/ml 10 years after therapy. 53% of the patients (n=235) reached a PSA nadir of 0.5 ng/ml. 66 patients (15%) had a local recurrence, 54 (12%) developed systemic disease and 12 (3%) had both local and systemic failure. The progression free survival rate was 65% at 5-year follow-up. Five-year progression free survival was 81% in the low risk group, 65% in the intermediate risk group and 59% in the high risk group. Five-year overall survival was 87% and 5-year disease specific survival 94%. Initial PSA value, risk group and age were significantly related to progression free survival.

CONCLUSIONS

Combined HDR brachytherapy with Iridium 192 is an alternative treatment option for patients with localized prostate cancer. Initial PSA value, risk group, and age are important prognostic factors for progression free survival.

Brachytherapy-related dysuria

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the incidence and temporal resolution of dysuria after permanent prostate brachytherapy, and to identify predictors of brachytherapy-related dysuria.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

The study included 130 patients with no history of transurethral resection of the prostate before treatment, who had brachytherapy on one of two prospective randomized trials, with explicitly planned and executed urethral-sparing techniques (100-150% minimum peripheral dose) using either 103Pd or 125I for clinical T1c-T2c prostate cancer. The median follow-up was 22.6 months. An alpha-blocker was initiated either prophylactically 2 weeks before implantation and continued at least until the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) returned to normal, or withheld until the onset of significant brachytherapy-related urinary morbidity. Dysuria was evaluated on a 0-10 scale, before brachytherapy and then at 1, 3, 6 and 12 months afterward, with a median of four dysuria questionnaires per patient. Clinical, treatment and dosimetric variables evaluated included alpha-blocker, age, IPSS before and the maximum after treatment, prostate volume on ultrasonography, hormonal status, supplemental radiotherapy, isotope, urethral dose, V(100/200), D90, and time to obtaining a normal IPSS.

RESULTS

The maximum incidence of dysuria was 85% at 1 month after brachytherapy, with subsequent resolution over time. The use of prophylactic tamsulosin resulted in a statistically lower dysuria severity score (difference of 2.7 vs 4.2, P < 0.005) at 1 month, with no discernible differences at 3, 6, 12 and 18 months. Patients with dysuria had a statistically higher IPSS. The dysuria resolved faster in patients implanted with 103Pd but was unaffected by the use of supplemental radiotherapy and/or androgen deprivation therapy. In multivariate analysis, prophylactic alpha-blockers resulted in statistically lower maximum dysuria scores, while the maximum IPSS after implantation and isotope type (but only at 6 months) were the best predictors of the resolution of dysuria.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysuria is common after brachytherapy but is typically mild. Prophylactic alpha-blockers gave significantly lower maximum dysuria scores but did not affect the time to the resolution of dysuria. The maximum IPSS after the implant was the best predictor of the resolution of dysuria.

The impact of radiation dose to the urethra on brachytherapy-related dysuria

PURPOSE

To determine the effect of urethral dose on dysuria after permanent prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

One hundred eight patients without a preimplant history of a transurethral resection underwent brachytherapy on one of two prospective randomized trials for clinical T1c-T2c (2002 AJCC) prostate cancer. Urethral dose was stratified into cohorts of <150% and 150% minimum peripheral dose (mPD) respectively. No patient received prophylactic alpha blockers. The median follow-up was 27.4 months. Dysuria was defined as pain and/or burning on urination and was evaluated on a 0-10 scale. Normalization of dysuria was defined as a return to within 1 point of baseline. Dysuria surveys were obtained before brachytherapy and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after implantation. Clinical, treatment, and dosimetric parameters evaluated included urethral dose, age, preimplant International Prostate Symptom Score (I-PSS), ultrasound volume, hormonal status, supplemental XRT, isotope, V(100/200), D(90), the maximum post-implant I-PSS, and the time to I-PSS resolution.

RESULTS

The incidence of dysuria peaked at 85% one month after brachytherapy with subsequent resolution over time. Radiation dose to the urethra (stratified into cohorts of <150%, and 150% mPD) was not a significant predictor of prevalence, severity, or resolution of dysuria. In a multivariate analysis, isotope predicted for dysuria normalization while preimplant I-PSS and D(90) predicted for maximum dysuria; however, the area under the ROC curve and the Pearson correlation coefficient revealed weak correlations.

CONCLUSIONS

Dysuria is common after brachytherapy, but typically minimal in severity. Urethral doses did not predict for either dysuria severity or normalization. Although preimplant I-PSS was the strongest predictor of maximum dysuria and isotope the best predictor for dysuria normalization, robust predictors for brachytherapy-related dysuria were not identified.

Correlating the degree of needle trauma during prostate brachytherapy and the development of acute urinary toxicity

PURPOSE

To determine if there is an association between the degree of prostate trauma during prostate brachytherapy and development of acute urinary toxicity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

In a consecutive prospective cohort of permanent (125)I prostate brachytherapy patients, the number of times each needle was repositioned was tracked, and the dosimetry plans were used to determine the number of times needles within 1 cm of the urethra were manipulated. Additionally, prostate volume, total number of needles, number of needles/prostate volume, and the number of periurethral needle manipulations/prostate volume were determined. The need for catheterization beyond 24 hours and the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) urinary toxicity score at 4 weeks were recorded. The independent samples t test was used to search for a correlation between these parameters and the recorded toxicity scores.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight consecutive implant patients were evaluated in the study. Median (range) values were as follows: prostate volume 35 cc ( range, 15-51 cc), number of needles per patient 32 (range, 21-41), number of needle manipulations per patient 94.5 ( range, 55-147), and number of periurethral needle manipulations 42 (range, 17-65). The only significant association between urinary toxicity and these variables was for the number of periurethral needle manipulations (p = 0.025).

CONCLUSIONS

These data provide evidence that needle prostate trauma during brachytherapy contributes to acute urinary toxicity.

A Spanner in the works: the use of a new temporary urethral stent to relieve bladder outflow obstruction after prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Assessment of the Spanner, a new temporary urethral stent to relieve bladder outflow obstruction and urinary symptoms after brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Five patients with unusually severe urinary morbidity after (125)I brachytherapy were recruited. The mean time after implant was 40 days (range 25-90). Spanner intraprostatic stents were introduced using topical anesthetic without complication.

RESULTS

All patients were able to void spontaneously with no post-void residual volume of urine. The flow rates increased in all cases (p=0.03) and the International Prostate Symptom Scores were significantly improved after stent insertion in all patients (p=0.03). All patients experienced some degree of pain or dysuria during stent use.

CONCLUSIONS

Bladder outflow obstruction was effectively treated with the Spanner intraprostatic stent, however pain limited the use of the device in the early post-brachytherapy patient group. Pharmacotherapy, stent design modification, or smaller stent diameter may increase the utility of stents after brachytherapy.

Sexual health recovery after prostatectomy, external radiation, or brachytherapy for early stage prostate cancer

Each of the three most common contemporary treatments for localized prostate cancer, radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy, and brachytherapy, can have adverse effects on sexual health. Sexual health outcome can be improved by treatment-specific factors, such as the use of nerve-sparing technique during radical prostatectomy, or worsened by the use of androgen deprivation before external beam radiotherapy or brachytherapy. Contemporary studies that have used validated questionnaires to evaluate multiple components of patient-reported sexuality following prostate cancer treatments provide benchmarks of sexual outcome expectations that are of interest to patients selecting their prostate cancer treatment.

Quality of Life Following Treatment for Early Prostate Cancer: Does Low Dose Rate (LDR) Brachytherapy Offer a Better Outcome? A Review

OBJECTIVE

Due to a lack of evidence from randomised studies, there is little agreement on the best form of treatment among men who require curative treatment for prostate cancer. The relative impact of the various treatments on symptoms and health-related quality of life is also controversial. We review the literature on quality of life changes following low dose rate brachytherapy (BXT) and compare BXT to other treatments for early prostate cancer.

METHODS

Systematic literature review 1988-2003 (Medline).

KEYWORDS

Brachytherapy; Radical prostatectomy; External beam radiotherapy; Quality of life; Symptoms.

RESULTS

Review of the current literature suggests that radical prostatectomy, external beam radiotherapy and BXT either alone or in combination with supplementary external beam radiotherapy offer good long-term health-related quality of life. However differences exist in the toxicity of treatment in terms of erectile function, voiding difficulty, incontinence and bowel function. These differences seem to persist for at least 3-5 years post-treatment though longer-term quality of life outcomes from modern techniques are unknown.

CONCLUSION

BXT offers a high probability of maintaining continence, potency and normal rectal function though both storage and voiding urinary symptoms have been reported. Addition of androgen deprivation and EBRT to BXT may increase urinary, bowel and sexual toxicity of treatment. Quality of life outcome following brachytherapy compares favourably with other radical treatment options for the management of early prostate cancer.

Chronic pelvic pain following prostate brachytherapy: A case report

PURPOSE

To alert physicians and potential patients that chronic postimplant pelvic pain syndromes can occur, and that dosimetric parameters (i.e., implant technique) may predispose patients to it.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The authors are currently following 3 prostate brachytherapy patients with what appear to be chronic radiation-related pelvic pain, variously exacerbated by urination or perineal pressure. The 3 patients were identified in the course of routine follow-up, and do not represent a concerted attempt to identify such patients from a larger group of patients being followed by the authors. Three control groups of 10 patients each treated with (125)I, (103)Pd, or (103)Pd + external beam radiation and with no reported dysuria at 6 months postimplant were taken from two ongoing prospective trials. The 3 patients reported here were each administered a brief questionnaire regarding the effect of their urinary pain on daily activities.

RESULTS

Patients with chronic pain tended to have high central prostatic doses, at least on some planes. Maximal, mean, and median urethral doses were higher for patients with chronic pain, but there was some overlap with control patients. The prostate V100s were similar between patients with chronic pain and controls, but there was a trend toward higher V200s and V300s in pain syndrome patients.

CONCLUSION

Recalcitrant brachytherapy-related pelvic pain is an uncommon occurrence that may be partly related to higher central prostatic doses.

Urinary morbidity after 125I brachytherapy of the prostate

OBJECTIVE

To assess urinary morbidity within the first 6 months after transperineal prostate brachytherapy (TPBT) with 125I for localized prostate adenocarcinoma.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between September 2000 and July 2001, 50 consecutive patients with favourable early-stage prostate cancer were treated with TPBT. Clinical and objective investigations, including uroflowmetry and postvoid residual urine measurements, were evaluated for short-term urinary morbidity; predictive factors were also sought.

RESULTS

Thirty-eight (76%) patients developed urinary disorders, but severe urinary complications were exceptional. The International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) changed significantly during the first and third month after implantation and then improved during the sixth month. Concomitantly, the maximum and the average urinary flow rate deteriorated significantly. The variations in postvoid residual were less significant. An initial IPSS of > 8 and previous alpha-blocker treatment were identified as significant predictive factors of urinary morbidity, as were the TPBT dose received by 90% of the target volume and by 30% of the urethra, and the volume of prostate receiving 144 Gy.

CONCLUSION

Urinary morbidity after TPBT is frequent but rarely exceptionally severe; patients must therefore be given full information. Patients with a higher initial IPSS or having had previous alpha-blocker treatment, with their associated dosimetric factors, are at greater risk of these urinary morbidity.

[Curative radiotherapy of localized prostate cancer. Treatment methods and results]

Radiation oncology has undergone rapid technical development during the last few years. The further development of treatment planning systems and treatment machines had a major impact on the improvement of radiation therapy results in prostate cancer. This paper presents different treatment modalities and results. Currently available are three-dimensional conformal radiation, intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT), high dose rate brachytherapy, and low dose rate brachytherapy (seed implantation). All modalities offer the possibility for dose escalation, which is essential for curative treatment. Dose escalation using these techniques makes it possible to reduce the dose for the surrounding organs at risk. Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy can be delivered with doses up to 78 Gy. The biochemical control rate is up to 90% depending on the risk factors T stage, initial PSA, and Gleason score. The incidence of late side effects is <10%. IMRT is a newer modality for percutaneous radiotherapy. By individual dose modification in the treatment fields, doses >80 Gy can be delivered in small treatment volumes. Treatment has to be highly precise to avoid dose peaks in the organs at risk, i.e., rectum and bladder. The preliminary data for remission and toxicity rates are promising, but it is too early for final conclusions. For cases with high-risk factors such as PSA >10 ng/ml, Gleason score >6, and stage T3, percutaneous radiation can be combined with neoadjuvant or adjuvant hormonal treatment. Randomized trials showed an improvement of the results in favor of combined treatment. HDR brachytherapy in combination with external radiation is a good option for dose escalation in patients with locally advanced tumors and/or other high-risk factors. The biochemical control rates are between 60 and 84%, late effects occur in less than 10%. Seed implantation (LDR brachytherapy) as sole treatment is indicated for prognostically favorable situations (PSA <10 ng/ml, Gleason score < or =6, and T1c or T2a tumors). The biochemical control rates are between 80 and 90%. Toxicity consists of urine retention and proctitis, occurring in 10-20% of the patients.

Iodine-125 brachytherapy for localized prostate cancer and urinary morbidity: a prospective comparison of two seed implant methods-preplanning and intraoperative planning

OBJECTIVES

To compare morbidity between two currently used iodine-125 seed implantation techniques for the treatment of localized prostate cancer.

METHODS

Iodine-125 brachytherapy was used in 300 consecutive men with localized prostate cancer. Two seed implant techniques were used: preplanning, using preloaded needles, and intraoperative planning, using a Mick applicator. A comparison was made between the groups for urinary morbidity. The International Prostate Symptom Score was assessed prospectively among all patients. Computed tomography-based implant quality parameters were correlated with lower urinary system morbidity.

RESULTS

The median follow-up was 30 months. In both treatment groups, the International Prostate Symptom Score increased significantly for about 9 to 12 months and returned to baseline thereafter. The International Prostate Symptom Scores reached a higher level and remained at a higher level for a longer period in the intraoperative group. Although the differences were statistically significant, they were of mild clinical importance. Overall, the incidence of acute retention and the need for surgery was very low in both groups (2% and 1%, respectively). No differences were noted between the two groups. Significantly better computed tomography-based implant dosimetry parameters were noted with the intraoperative method. A positive correlation (P < 0.001) was found between the dosimetry parameters and symptom severity.

CONCLUSIONS

This prospective study reports the first large-scale comparison of urologic outcomes after two different seed implant techniques. Both were associated with very low urinary retention rates or other grade 3 or greater urologic morbidity. Almost all men had worse urinary symptoms for the first 6 to 9 months, regardless of the seed implant technique used. Patients treated with the intraoperative method demonstrated toxicity for a longer duration. Because of the much better gland isodose coverage and greater doses delivered in the intraoperative seed implantation, we favor this method.

Urinary symptom flare following I-125 prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Although acute urinary morbidity after prostate brachytherapy has been well-documented, long-term effects have not been fully characterized. We describe a late complication of I-125 prostate brachytherapy we have termed urinary symptom flare.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 172 patients who underwent I-125 prostate brachytherapy between 1991 and 1998 completed a pretreatment and at least four follow-up International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) forms. Follow-up visits were made 1 month after implant and at 3- to 6-month intervals thereafter. Follow-up periods ranged from 12 to 106 months (median 41.5 months). The number of IPSS forms per patient ranged from 4 to 17 (median 6). A total of 32.6% of patients received both 3 months of neoadjuvant and 3 months of adjuvant hormonal therapy. Postimplant dosimetry revealed D90 values of 5578-25692 cGy (median 17290 cGy). The peak voiding score, indicating the time of the most severe urinary morbidity after brachytherapy, was defined as the highest rise in IPSS recorded after implantation. The nadir score was the lowest IPSS attained after the peak score, generally indicating a return to the patient's preimplant urinary function. A "flare" was defined as a rise in IPSS from the nadir score of at least five points, denoting a late exacerbation of urinary symptoms. Patients with a transient rise in PSA of 0.1 ng/ml or greater were considered to have a PSA bounce.

RESULTS

The mean pretreatment IPSS for the study population was 7.5. The mean peak IPSS was 19.4 and occurred from 0.1 to 25 months (median 1.3 months) after the date of implant. The mean nadir IPSS was 6.7 and occurred from 1.6 to 61.6 months (median 14.3) after brachytherapy. A total of 35.5% of patients (61/172) have experienced a urinary flare of 5 or more points, as measured by the IPSS form. The mean "flare" IPSS was 16.4. The time to develop a flare ranged from 5.8 to 64 months (median 23.9 months). The actuarial risk of developing a flare was 21% by 2 years, 34% by 3 years, 38% by 4 years, and 47% by five years. In 72% of patients (44/61) who developed a flare, the flare subsided to baseline by the next follow-up visit. Of the remaining patients, 3% (2/61) reached a baseline value two follow-up visits later. In 25% of the patients (15/61) who experienced a flare, it occurred during their last follow-up visit. No single factor, including PSA (p = 0.9), stage (p = 0.9), use of hormone therapy (p = 0.9), implanted activity (p = 0.1), ultrasound volume (p = 0.4), dose (p = 0.4), seed number (p = 0.4), or needle number (p = 0.9), had a significant effect on the risk of developing a flare. There was a trend for younger patients (<or=65 vs. >65, p = 0.07) to experience the urinary flare.

CONCLUSIONS

Acute symptoms after I-125 prostate brachytherapy appear to peak 1 month after a prostate implant and return to their baseline values at 1 year. A transient late exacerbation of urinary symptoms is common and can occur in up to half of all patients by 5 years. There appears to be no statistically significant association between a late exacerbation in urinary symptoms and clinical or implant parameters.

Practical considerations in permanent brachytherapy for localized adenocarcinoma of the prostate

Prostate brachytherapy has become an accepted treatment modality for localized prostate cancer. Long-term biochemical and biopsy data confirm the early positive impressions that brachytherapy is as valid a treatment option as radical prostatectomy or EBRT. Quality-of-life data also look promising, but more follow-up data are needed. Is brachytherapy as good as or perhaps better than radical prostatectomy? This question cannot be answered yet. Well-controlled, randomized studies are needed. In the meantime, the clinician will have to rely on the available published data.

Early prostate cancer: clinical decision-making

Prostate cancer is one of the most common malignant diseases for which health-care intervention is sought worldwide, and in many developed countries it is the most common. Some patients with early-stage prostate cancer, especially those who are elderly and have comorbidities, can be observed without treatment. Surgery (radical prostatectomy) and radiotherapy (external-beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, or both) are the most widely accepted curative options for patients with early-stage disease who need intervention. All these local treatments have been refined, resulting in comparable cure rates; however, they all have different side-effect profiles. Adjuvant systemic treatments (hormones or chemotherapy), which are effective for advanced-stage disease, might have a greater role in early-stage disease. Selecting the best option for individuals from the available options is challenging--the decision on whether and how to treat is based on many disease and patient factors. Here, we review the major treatment options, discuss their relative advantages and disadvantages, and provide a general approach to management of patients with early-stage prostate cancer.

Dysuria after permanent prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Although numerous prostate cancer quality-of-life studies have been reported, a paucity of data exists regarding brachytherapy-related dysuria. In this study, we evaluated the incidence and temporal resolution of dysuria, along with the influence of multiple treatment, clinical, and dosimetric parameters.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Five hundred eighty-one consecutive patients without a preimplant history of transurethral resection of the prostate underwent brachytherapy between January 1998 and December 2001 for clinical T1c-T3a (1997 AJCC) adenocarcinoma of the prostate gland. The evaluated population consisted of the 546 patients who had completed at least two postimplant dysuria evaluations. The median patient follow-up was 26.4 months. In all patients, alpha-blocker therapy was initiated before implantation and continued at least until the International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS) returned to baseline. The frequency of dysuria was assessed on a 1-5 scale using the IPSS scoring criteria. The dysuria severity was scored on a 1-10 scale. The clinical parameters evaluated included age, T stage, preimplant IPSS, ultrasound volume, and elapsed time since implantation. The treatment parameters included the use of neoadjuvant hormonal manipulation, use of supplemental external beam radiotherapy, isotope, and total implanted seed strength. The dosimetric parameters included values of the minimal dose received by 90% of the prostate, the percentage of prostate volume receiving 100%, 150%, and 200% of the prescribed minimal peripheral dose, and the median and maximal urethral doses.

RESULTS

The incidence of dysuria peaked at 52% 1 month after implantation. The median dysuria frequency score was 0 of 5 for all patients and 2 of 5 for those reporting dysuria. The median severity score was 0 of 10 for the entire cohort and 3 of 10 for those reporting dysuria. For the entire group, both the frequency and the severity of dysuria steadily improved with time, with near complete resolution of dysuria at 45 months. For those patients reporting dysuria, neither the frequency nor the severity revealed any durable improvement for approximately 36 months. Patients with dysuria displayed higher postimplant IPSSs. Of the 7 IPSS questions, nocturia and incomplete voiding were the best surrogates for dysuria. The isotope, supplemental external beam radiotherapy, hormonal status, minimal dose received by 90% of the prostate, and urethral dose did not predict for dysuria.

CONCLUSIONS

After permanent prostate brachytherapy, dysuria is a relatively common event, but only rarely severe in frequency or intensity. At approximately 45 months after brachytherapy, dysuria appears to resolve in almost all patients.

The effects of edema on urethral dose following palladium-103 prostate brachytherapy

The effects of edema on urethral dose after interstitial prostate brachytherapy with palladium-103 (103Pd) were studied. Fifty patients underwent a 90-Gy 103Pd implant followed by dosimetric computed tomography (CT). Twenty-one days later, a Foley catheter was reinserted and a dosimetric CT was repeated. The mean reduction in prostate volume between day 0 and day 21 was 16%. Median prostate D90 on day 0 was 89.7 Gy (range 59.5 to 127) and 99.5 Gy (range 62.5 to 130) on day 21. Median prostate V100 was 90% (range 63 to 98%) on day 0 and 96% (range 66 to 99%) on day 21. Median V150 was 61% (range 31 to 85%) on day 0 and 75% (range 39 to 93%) on day 21. Median urethral D50 was 107 Gy (range 57 to 201) on day 0 and 126 Gy (range 64 to 193) on day 21. Regression analysis demonstrated a significant correlation between the decrease in the prostate volume and the increased urethral D50 (r 0.58, p < 0.05). Acute urinary toxicity was 32% grade 0, 38% grade 1, and 30% grade 2. The median urethral D50 increased by a mean of 18% with a correlation coefficient of 0.58 (p < 0.05). Catheterization of the urethra was well tolerated and was of value in better characterizing urethral dose after 103Pd brachytherapy.

Predictive factors of acute urinary morbidity after iodine-125 brachytherapy for localised prostate cancer: a phase 2 study

PURPOSE

To analyse predictive factors of acute urinary morbidity after transperineal permanent prostate brachytherapy.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Sixty patients treated in a phase 2 study with iodine-125 brachytherapy (9/1998 to 2/2000) for localised prostate adenocarcinoma were analysed after at least 1-year follow-up. Prescribed dose was 144 Gy and all patients had a pre-planning and a post-implant dosimetry. Urinary morbidity was evaluated prospectively using the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) scale. We examined the relationship between pre-implant ultrasound prostate volume, post-implant CT-scan prostate volume, neoadjuvant hormonotherapy, total number of needles and seeds, post-implant dosimetry variables, first 30 vs. last 30 treated patients and post-implant urinary morbidity.

RESULTS

All patients experienced some degree of urinary distress symptoms after treatment. Symptoms were generally mild grade 1 in 56% and grade 2 in 10% lasting less than 6 months. Eight patients (13%) required bladder catheter for acute urinary obstruction. At 1-year follow-up, nine patients (15%) complained from persistent dysuria requiring in three cases endoscopic prostate resection. The percentage of urethra volume receiving 216 Gy (cut-off 40%) and the pre-implant prostate volume (cut-off 31 ml) were the only statistically significant predictor of grade 2-3 or persistent urinary morbidity on multivariate analysis.

CONCLUSION

Our short-term data suggest that both pre-implant prostate volume value and post-implant V.U. 150 value might be predictors for urinary morbidity after prostate brachytherapy.

Probability of late rectal morbidity in 125I prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Rectal toxicity is a concern in prostate brachytherapy because it is difficult to avoid delivering a dose equal to, or greater than, the prescription dose to the anterior surface of the rectum. The purpose of this study was to define the probability that a patient will experience Grade 2 (bleeding/ulceration) late rectal morbidity after 125I prostate brachytherapy according to the rectal dosimetry.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Ninety-eight consecutive patients who received monotherapy 125I prostate implants for treatment of Stage T1-T2, favorable-risk adenocarcinoma of the prostate were evaluated for Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Grade 2 late rectal morbidity. All reported incidences of late morbidity were retrospectively confirmed by colonoscopy. All patients had at least 15 months follow-up after implantation. The median follow-up was 32 months (range 15-54). The rectal dosimetry was based on a CT scan obtained at 3-9 weeks after implantation. The rectum was contoured on each CT image between the base and apex of the prostate. A dose-surface histogram was compiled for each implant, and the relative surface area that received a dose > or =100, > or =150, > or =200, > or =300, > or =400, and > or =500 Gy was recorded. The probability of developing late rectal toxicity was calculated by logistic regression analysis as a function of dose and the percentage of the rectal surface that received that dose.

RESULTS

Of the 98 patients, 10 developed Grade 2 late rectal morbidity. The percentage of the rectal surface that received 100, 150, 200, and 300 Gy was significantly greater (p < or =0.02) for patients who experienced late rectal morbidity. The probability of late rectal morbidity increased with both the dose and the percentage of the rectal surface that received that dose. The probability was < or =1% when 20%, 7%, and 0% of the rectal surface received 100, 150, and 200 Gy, respectively. The probability increased to < or =5% when 31%, 19%, and 9% of the rectal surface received these doses. The probability of late rectal morbidity can also be expressed in terms of the maximal rectal dose. The probability of late morbidity was 0.4%, 1.2%, and 4.7% when the maximal rectal dose was 150, 200, and 300 Gy, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The percentage of the rectal surface that receives a dose > or =100 Gy is predictive of Grade 2 (bleeding/ulceration) late rectal morbidity after 125I prostate brachytherapy. The probability of late morbidity depends on both the dose and the percentage of the rectal surface that received that dose. Our results indicate that the rectum can tolerate doses of 100, 150, and 200 Gy to approximately 30%, 20%, and 10% of the rectal surface with a < or =5% risk of late morbidity. Our results also indicate that the practical guideline for limiting the incidence of late morbidity to 1%, 3%, or 5% is to keep the maximal rectal dose to <200, 250, and 300 Gy, respectively.

Prospective assessment of patient-reported long-term urinary morbidity and associated quality of life changes after 125I prostate brachytherapy

PURPOSE

Prostate brachytherapy has been reported to have less morbidity for patients than radical prostatectomy or external beam irradiation. However, to date there have been no long-term data to support these claims. With radiation doses in excess of 140 Gy required to control the tumor, disabling chronic urinary symptoms and associated quality of life (QOL) changes might be expected to occur. This study prospectively assessed the long-term effects of (125)I prostate brachytherapy on urinary morbidity.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

A total of 248 patients with a median age of 67 years (range, 43-83 years) who presented with T1-T2 prostate cancer were treated with (125)I seed implantation and followed up for a minimum of 18 months after treatment (range, 18 to 108 months; median, 31 months). There were 177 T1b-T2a cases and 41 patients with prostate-specific antigen >10 ng/ml; 20.2% were treated with hormonal therapy. All patients prospectively reported their urinary symptoms and QOL assessment on American Urological Association symptom score records before treatment and at each follow-up visit. Urinary symptoms at last follow-up were compared with pretreatment scores. Radiation doses to the prostate (dose delivered to 90% of the gland; D(90)) and urethra (D(30)) were determined by CT-based dosimetry.

RESULTS

The median prostate D(90) was 165 Gy (range, 16.5-260 Gy), and the median urethra D(30) was 192 Gy (range, 23.5-306 Gy). Mean individual scores and QOL ranged from 0.31 to 1.65 before implantation and 0.39 to 1.73 afterward. There were no significant differences between pretreatment and last mean scores for any of the categories except for a small but significant increase in urgency (p=0.01) and weak stream (p=0.03). The cohort of patients who initially presented with marked urinary symptoms (initial score >or=3) had improvement in individual scores by 31.4% to 58.2%, total score by 31.1% (p=0.0005), and QOL by 40.6% (p<0.0001).

CONCLUSIONS

This study suggests that prostate brachytherapy is associated with minimal long-term urinary morbidity. The subgroup of patients who present with marked urinary symptoms before implantation has improvement in symptoms and QOL after implantation. These data substantiate the favorable long-term QOL outcomes associated with modern brachytherapy techniques.

Effect of anatomic, procedural, and dosimetric variables on urinary retention after permanent iodine-125 prostate brachytherapy

OBJECTIVES

To correlate anatomic, procedural, and dosimetric parameters with the rate of intermittent self-catheterization (ISC).

METHODS

The records of 402 patients with a median age of 69 years treated with 125I prostate seed implantation from 1996 to 2001 were reviewed for the use of ISC. The records were examined for the preimplant factors: prostate volume, use of androgen deprivation, and prostate length. The intraprocedural factor reviewed was the number of needles used. The following postimplant information was also collected: preimplant transrectal ultrasound-generated prostate volume/postimplant computed tomography-generated prostate volume ratio, V100, V150, V200, V300, V400, D90, and D100. Correlation was assessed using logistic regression analysis.

RESULTS

Forty-four patients had to use ISC (10.9%). The mean and median duration of ISC was 11.9 and 6 weeks, respectively. From univariate analysis, prostate length and prostate volume were found to be statistically significant predictors of ISC after 125I prostate seed implantation with a P value of 0.0002 and 0.0042, respectively. With multivariate analysis, only prostate length was a statistically significant predictor of ISC use after 125I prostate seed implantation (P = 0.0095).

CONCLUSIONS

Prostate length is an important predictor of ISC after 125I prostate seed implantation.

Primary radiation therapy for localized prostate cancer

Prostate cancer in men is similar to breast cancer in women; both cancers rank first, respectively, in incidence and are normally responsive to radiation therapy. In addition, advances in mammography help detect earlier breast cancers, and the development and refinement of prostatic specific antigen (PSA) has resulted in early detection of low-stage localized prostate cancers. This has generated debate over the proper management of localized prostate cancer. While there have not been any controlled, prospective, randomized trials of sufficient power to compare the various local therapies, based on the current available data, the three commonly used local modalities, surgery, and external beam radiation therapy and brachytherapy (radioactive seed implant), have similar efficacy controlling the disease up to 10 years in many patients. Technological advances in treatment delivery and planning have improved the treatment of prostate cancer with external-beam radiotherapy using three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy (3DCRT), ultrasound-guided transperineal implant, or intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), as well as proton or neutron beam based therapies.