Brachytherapy for recurrent malignant astrocytoma

Primary brain tumours in adults

The most frequent adult-type primary CNS tumours are diffuse gliomas, but a large variety of rarer CNS tumour types exists. The classification of these tumours is increasingly based on molecular diagnostics, which is reflected in the extensive molecular foundation of the recent WHO 2021 classification of CNS tumours. Resection as extensive as is safely possible is the cornerstone of treatment in most gliomas, and is now also recommended early in the treatment of patients with radiological evidence of histologically low-grade tumours. For the adult-type diffuse glioma, standard of care is a combination of radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Although treatment with curative intent is not available, combined modality treatment has resulted in long-term survival (>10-20 years) for some patients with isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) mutant tumours. Other rarer tumours require tailored approaches, best delivered in specialised centres. Targeted treatments based on molecular alterations still only play a minor role in the treatment landscape of adult-type diffuse glioma, and today are mainly limited to patients with tumours with BRAFV600E (ie, Val600Glu) mutations. Immunotherapy for CNS tumours is still in its infancy, and so far, trials with checkpoint inhibitors and vaccination studies have not shown improvement in patient outcomes in glioblastoma. Current research is focused on improving our understanding of the immunosuppressive tumour environment, the molecular heterogeneity of tumours, and the role of tumour microtube network connections between cells in the tumour microenvironment. These factors all appear to play a role in treatment resistance, and indicate that novel approaches are needed to further improve outcomes of patients with CNS tumours.

The role of extracellular vesicles in acquisition of resistance to therapy in glioblastomas

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most aggressive primary brain tumor with a median survival of 15 months despite standard care therapy consisting of maximal surgical debulking, followed by radiation therapy with concurrent and adjuvant temozolomide treatment. The natural history of GBM is characterized by inevitable recurrence with patients dying from increasingly resistant tumor regrowth after therapy. Several mechanisms including inter- and intratumoral heterogeneity, the evolution of therapy-resistant clonal subpopulations, reacquisition of stemness in glioblastoma stem cells, multiple drug efflux mechanisms, the tumor-promoting microenvironment, metabolic adaptations, and enhanced repair of drug-induced DNA damage have been implicated in therapy failure. Extracellular vesicles (EVs) have emerged as crucial mediators in the maintenance and establishment of GBM. Multiple seminal studies have uncovered the multi-dynamic role of EVs in the acquisition of drug resistance. Mechanisms include EV-mediated cargo transfer and EVs functioning as drug efflux channels and decoys for antibody-based therapies. In this review, we discuss the various mechanisms of therapy resistance in GBM, highlighting the emerging role of EV-orchestrated drug resistance. Understanding the landscape of GBM resistance is critical in devising novel therapeutic approaches to fight this deadly disease.

Receipt of brachytherapy is an independent predictor of survival in glioblastoma in the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database

INTRODUCTION

There has been a resurgence of interest in brachytherapy as a treatment for glioblastoma, with several currently ongoing clinical trials. To provide a foundation for the analysis of these trials, we analyze the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database to determine whether receipt of brachytherapy conveys a survival benefit independent of traditional prognostic factors.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We identified 60,456 glioblastoma patients, of whom 362 underwent brachytherapy. We grouped patients based on receipt of brachytherapy and compared clinical and demographic variables between groups using Student's t-test and Pearson's chi-squared test. We assessed survival using Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox proportional hazards models.

RESULTS

Median overall survival was 16 months in patients who received brachytherapy compared to 9 months in those who did not (log-rank p < 0.001). Patients who underwent brachytherapy tended to be younger (p < 0.001), suffered from smaller tumors (< 4 cm, p < 0.001), and were more likely to have undergone gross total resection (GTR, p < 0.001). In univariable Cox models, these variables were independently associated with improved overall survival. Additionally, improved survival was associated with known receipt of chemotherapy (HR 0.459, p < 0.001), external beam radiation (HR 0.447, p < 0.001), and brachytherapy (HR 0.637, p < 0.001). The association between brachytherapy and improved survival remained robust (HR 0.859, p = 0.031) in a multivariable model that adjusted for patient age, tumor size, tumor location, GTR, receipt of chemotherapy, and receipt of external beam radiation.

CONCLUSION

Our SEER analysis indicates that brachytherapy is associated with improved survival in glioblastoma after controlling for age, tumor size/location, extent of resection, chemotherapy, and external beam radiation.

Neuroimaging classification of progression patterns in glioblastoma: a systematic review

BACKGROUND

Our primary objective was to report the current neuroimaging classification systems of spatial patterns of progression in glioblastoma. In addition, we aimed to report the terminology used to describe 'progression' and to assess the compliance with the Response Assessment in Neuro-Oncology (RANO) Criteria.

METHODS

We conducted a systematic review to identify all neuroimaging studies of glioblastoma that have employed a categorical classification system of spatial progression patterns. Our review was registered with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) registry.

RESULTS

From the included 157 results, we identified 129 studies that used labels of spatial progression patterns that were not based on radiation volumes (Group 1) and 50 studies that used labels that were based on radiation volumes (Group 2). In Group 1, we found 113 individual labels and the most frequent were: local/localised (58%), distant/distal (51%), diffuse (20%), multifocal (15%) and subependymal/subventricular zone (15%). We identified 13 different labels used to refer to 'progression', of which the most frequent were 'recurrence' (99%) and 'progression' (92%). We identified that 37% (n = 33/90) of the studies published following the release of the RANO classification were adherent compliant with the RANO criteria.

CONCLUSIONS

Our review reports significant heterogeneity in the published systems used to classify glioblastoma spatial progression patterns. Standardization of terminology and classification systems used in studying progression would increase the efficiency of our research in our attempts to more successfully treat glioblastoma.

Coincidence vs Cause: Cure in Three Glioblastoma Patients Treated with Brachytherapy

Background:

Very long term survival after diagnosis of malignant glioma has been described in individual case reports. Survival of more than 10 years is extremely rare, especially when identified in 3 out of 71 patients assigned to one arm of a randomized controlled trial.

Patients:

Three patients survived 11, 16, and 18 years following the diagnosis of glioblastoma and treatment with surgery, conventional fractionated radiation, and high-activity iodine-125 boost brachytherapy as part of a randomized controlled trial.

Conclusion:

Despite this apparent cause and effect relationship, statistical analysis shows no relationship between these cures and treatment with brachytherapy. Cure of glioblastoma remains rare.

Cerebral radiation necrosis: a review of the pathobiology, diagnosis and management considerations

Radiation therapy forms one of the building blocks of the multi-disciplinary management of patients with brain tumors. Improved survival following radiation therapy may come with a cost, including the potential complication of radiation necrosis. Radiation necrosis impacts the quality of life in cancer survivors, and it is essential to detect and effectively treat this entity as early as possible. Significant progress in neuro-radiology and molecular pathology facilitate more straightforward diagnosis and characterization of cerebral radiation necrosis. Several therapeutic interventions, both medical and surgical, may halt the progression of radiation necrosis and diminish or abrogate its clinical manifestations, but there are still no definitive guidelines to follow explicitly that guide treatment of radiation necrosis. We discuss the pathobiology, clinical features, diagnosis, available treatment modalities, and outcomes in the management of patients with intracranial radiation necrosis that follows radiation used to treat brain tumors.

Safety and efficacy of concomitant chemotherapeutic wafers and iodine-125 seeds for recurrent glioblastoma

Background:

Patients with recurrent malignant gliomas have a uniformly poor prognosis. However, further treatment is often warranted at the time of recurrence. Low-activity implanted brachytherapeutic devices, such as iodine-125 seeds, and implantable chemotherapeutic devices such as 1, 3-bis (2-chloroethyl)-nitrosourea (BCNU) impregnated polymer wafers (Gliadel^®) have been shown to be safe and modestly effective, but a comparison of combination therapy versus Gliadel^® implantation alone has not been performed.

Methods:

We retrospectively examined 24 patients following re-resection of recurrent glioblastoma, with 17 patients undergoing implantation of both Gliadel^® and iodine-125 seeds, and 7 patients undergoing implantation of Gliadel^® only. Outcomes examined included adverse events, survival after re-resection (SAR), and time to tumor progression after re-resection (PAR).

Results:

Implantation of both Gliadel^® and low activity iodine-125 seeds is safe with only two wound infections noted, a complication rate comparable to previous reports. The combination appears to confer a median SAR benefit if the activity per tumor resection volume exceeds 0.8 mCi/mL (60 versus 31 weeks, P = 0.02), and this benefit remained significant on multivariate analysis (HR =0.26 [CI:0.07-0.93], P = 0.03). Gross total resection of tumor was also significantly associated with longer time to PAR (HR =5.4 [CI: 1.13-26.0], P = 0.03).

Conclusions:

The concomitant use of Gliadel^® and low activity iodine-125 seeds following re-resection of recurrent glioblastoma is safe. Our study demonstrated a significant benefit in SAR if the iodine-125 activity per tumor volume is greater than 0.8 mCi/mL. While our sample size is small, our results are in agreement with previous studies demonstrating the efficacy of combination treatment.

Advances in radiotherapy of brain tumors: radiobiology versus reality

Radiotherapy still remains the most effective adjunctive therapy for malignant gliomas following surgery and provides useful local control for some benign tumors. Research efforts have been directed towards several aspects of the radiation therapy of tumors. The results of clinical trials undertaken in the last decade offer some basis for optimism in the management of patients with malignant brain tumors, although cure is still not a realistic objective. This review focuses on the rationale and radiobiological basis for recent developments in the radiotherapy of adult brain tumors. The salient issues are discussed from a neurosurgeon's perspective.

Iodine-125 brachytherapy for brain tumours--a review

Iodine-125 brachytherapy has been applied to brain tumours since 1979. Even though the physical and biological characteristics make these implants particularly attractive for minimal invasive treatment, the place for stereotactic brachytherapy is still poorly defined.An extensive review of the literature has been performed, especially concerning indications, results and complications. Iodine-125 seeds have been implanted in astrocytomas I-III, glioblastomas, metastases and several other tumour entities. Outcome data given in the literature are summarized. Complications are rare in carefully selected patients.All in all, for highly selected patients with newly diagnosed or recurrent primary or metastatic tumours, this method provides encouraging survival rates with relatively low complication rates and a good quality of life.

A Review of the Role of Re-Irradiation in Recurrent High-Grade Glioma (HGG)

Despite the use of more effective multimodal treatments in high-grade glioma (HGG), the outcome of patients affected by this disease is still dismal and recurrence is a very common event. Many therapeutic approaches, alone or combined (surgery, drugs, targeted agents, immunotherapy, radiotherapy, supportive therapy), are available in the clinical armamentarium so far. The attitude of physicians is increasingly interventionist, but recurrent HGG still remains a very difficult scenario to be treated. Radiotherapy with different re-irradiation techniques is increasingly proposed as a therapeutic option with interesting results, even though the resulting duration of response is usually quite short. Most lesions re-recur locally, with inadequate identification and targeting of viable tumor being the most important cause of failure. Prognosis is affected by many patient-, tumor-, and treatment-associated prognostic factors. Radiotherapy is delivered with many advanced modalities: 3D-CRT, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, stereotactic fractionated radiotherapy, radiosurgery, and brachitherapy with or without chemotherapy administration. In order to evaluate the feasibility and efficacy of re-irradiation in this setting, we reviewed the PubMed and MEDLINE databases restricting the search to original reports published from January 1990 to June 2011. The search resulted in a total of 155 reports: 78 of them covering 2,688 patients treated with different irradiation modalities overall fulfilled the entry criteria. Radiation therapy demonstrated to be an acceptable option in recurrent HGG with good response rates and acceptable toxicity.

Hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy: an effective therapy for recurrent high-grade gliomas

PURPOSE

Salvage options for recurrent high-grade gliomas (HGGs) are limited by cumulative toxicity and limited efficacy despite advances in chemotherapeutic and radiotherapeutic techniques. Previous studies have reported encouraging survival results and favorable toxicity with fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy, and small studies have shown similar benefit using a shortened course of hypofractionated stereotactic radiation therapy (H-SRT). We sought to determine the efficacy and toxicity profile of H-SRT alone or in addition to repeat craniotomy or concomitant chemotherapy.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Between 1994 and 2008, 147 patients with recurrent HGG were treated with H-SRT (median dose, 35 Gy in 3.5-Gy fractions). Cox regression models were used to analyze survival outcomes. Variables included age, surgery before H-SRT, time to first recurrence, reirradiation dose, inclusion of chemotherapy with H-SRT, and gross tumor volume (GTV).

RESULTS

Younger age (P = .001), smaller GTV (P = .025), and shorter time between diagnosis and recurrence (P = .034) were associated with improvement in survival from H-SRT. Doses of radiation > or = 35 Gy approached significance (P = .07). There was no significant benefit of surgical resection or chemotherapy in this population when analysis was controlled for other prognostic factors.

CONCLUSION

H-SRT was well tolerated and resulted in a median survival time of 11 months after H-SRT, independent of re-operation or concomitant chemotherapy. Patients who experienced recurrence within 6 months after initial treatment had an excellent response and should not be disqualified from H-SRT. This is the largest series to examine the efficacy and tolerability of H-SRT in recurrent HGG.

Controversies concerning the application of brachytherapy in central nervous system tumors

INTRODUCTION

Brachytherapy (BRT) is defined as a therapy technique where a radioactive source is placed a short distance from or within the tumor being treated. Much expectation has been placed on its efficacy to improve the outcome for patients with central nervous system (CNS) tumors due to the initial promising results from single institution retrospective studies. However, these optimistic findings have been highly debated since the selection criteria itself is preferable to other therapeutic modalities. The fact that BRT demonstrated no significant survival advantage in two prospective studies, together with the emerging role of stereotactic convergence therapy as a promising alternative, has further decreased the enthusiasm for BRT. Despite all the negative aspects, BRT continues to be conducted for the management of CNS tumors including gliomas, meningiomas and brain metastases.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

As many controversies have been aroused concerning the experience and future application of BRT, this article reviews the existing heterogeneities in terms of implants choice, optimal dose rate, targeting volume, timing of BRT, patients selection, substantial efficacy, BRT in comparison with stereotactic convergence therapy techniques and BRT in combination with other treatment modalities (data were identified by Pubmed searches).

RESULTS AND CONCLUSION

Though it is inconvincible to argue for the routine use of BRT, BRT may provide a choice for patients with large recurrent or inoperable deep-seated tumors, especially with the Glia-site technique. Radiotherapies including BRT may hold more promise if biologic mechanisms of radiation could be better understand and biologic modifications could be added in clinical trials.

Technological advances in radiation oncology for central nervous system tumors

Advances in computer software technology have led to enormous progress that has enabled increasing levels of complexity to be incorporated into radiotherapy treatment planning systems. Because of these changes, the delivery of radiotherapy evolved from therapy designed primarily on plain 2-dimensional X-ray images and hand calculations to therapy based on 3-dimensional images incorporating increasingly complex computer algorithms in the planning process. In addition, challenges in treatment planning and radiation delivery, such as problems with setup error and organ movement, have begun to be systematically addressed, ushering in an era of so-called 4-dimensional radiotherapy. This review article discusses how these advances have changed the way in which many common neoplasms of the central nervous system are being treated at present.

End point assessment in gliomas: novel treatments limit usefulness of classical Macdonald's Criteria

Recent trials in glioma have revealed significant limitations in the end points used. This requires a critical and comprehensive review of how brain tumor trials are conducted, particularly of which end points are defined and how response and progression are defined.

Phase I trial of gross total resection, permanent iodine-125 brachytherapy, and hyperfractionated radiotherapy for newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility of gross total resection and permanent I-125 brachytherapy followed by hyperfractionated radiotherapy for patients with newly diagnosed glioblastoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

From April 1999 to May 2002, 21 patients with glioblastoma multiforme were enrolled on a Phase I protocol investigating planned gross total resection and immediate placement of permanent I-125 seeds, followed by postoperative hyperfractionated radiotherapy to a dose of 60 Gy at 100 cGy b.i.d., 5 days per week. Median age and Karnofsky performance status were 50 years (range, 32-65 years) and 90 (range, 70-100), respectively. Toxicity was assessed according to Radiation Therapy Oncology Group criteria.

RESULTS

Eighteen patients completed treatment according to protocol. The median preoperative tumor volume on magnetic resonance imaging was 18.6 cm(3) (range, 4.4-41.2 cm(3)). The median brachytherapy dose measured 5 mm radially outward from the resection cavity was 400 Gy (range, 200-600 Gy). Ten patients underwent 12 reoperations, with 11 of 12 reoperations demonstrating necrosis without evidence of tumor. Because of high toxicity, the study was terminated early. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 57 and 114 weeks, respectively, but not significantly improved compared with historical patients treated at University of California, San Francisco, with gross total resection and radiotherapy without brachytherapy.

CONCLUSIONS

Treatment with gross total resection and permanent I-125 brachytherapy followed by hyperfractionated radiotherapy as performed in this study results in high toxicity and reoperation rates, without demonstrated improvement in survival.

GliaSite Brachytherapy for Treatment of Recurrent Malignant Gliomas:A Retrospective Multi-institutional Analysis

OBJECTIVE:

To review the cumulative experience of 10 institutions in treating recurrent malignant gliomas with the brachytherapy device, GliaSite Radiation Therapy System.

METHODS:

The patient population consisted of 95 patients with recurrent grade 3 or 4 gliomas, a median age of 51 years, and a median Karnofsky performance status score of 80. All patients had previously undergone resection and had received external beam radiotherapy as part of their initial treatment. After recurrence, each patient underwent maximal surgical debulking of their recurrent lesion and placement of an expandable balloon catheter (GliaSite) in the tumor cavity. The balloon was afterloaded with liquid 125I (Iotrex) to deliver a median dose of 60 Gy to an average depth of 1 cm with a median dose rate of 52.3 Gy/hr. Patients were carefully followed with serial magnetic resonance imaging and monthly examinations for tumor progression, side effects, and survival.

RESULTS:

The median survival for all patients, measured from date of GliaSite placement, was 36.3 weeks with an estimated 1 year survival of 31.1%. The median survival was 35.9 weeks for patients with an initial diagnosis of glioblastoma multiforme and 43.6 weeks for those with non- glioblastoma multiforme malignant gliomas. Analysis of the influence of various individual prognostic factors on patient survival demonstrated that only Karnofsky performance status significantly predicted for improved survival. There were three cases of pathologically documented radiation necrosis.

CONCLUSION:

Reirradiation of malignant gliomas with the GliaSite Radiation Therapy System after reresection seems to provide a modest survival benefit above what would be expected from surgery alone. This report not only confirms the initial results of the feasibility study but provides evidence that similar outcomes can be obtained outside of a clinical trial.

Brachytherapy for brain tumors

Over the past several decades neurooncologists have attempted to find an adjuvant treatment that prolongs survival for patients with malignant brain tumors. Brachytherapy, radiotherapy delivered by placing radioactive sources directly into the tumor, was initially thought to be the solution to this problem. Initial single institution studies showed very promising results; however, this technique has failed to show a significant survival advantage in two randomized studies. Despite this, brachytherapy continues to be used in a number of centers throughout the world for the treatment of various types of brain tumors including low-grade gliomas, anaplastic astrocytomas, glioblastomas, meningiomas and metastases. This article reviews brachytherapy's rationale, radiobiology, complications, indications, and results from numerous studies that have focused on its application for brain tumors with emphasis on its application for glial tumors.

Radiothérapie des glioblastomes : de la radiobiologie à la chimiothérapie concomitante

The prognosis of glioblastoma remains extremely poor. Clinical research has been very active for thirty years, and has explored all the concepts developed in the laboratories of radiobiology. Radiosensitisation of hypoxic tumours, hyperfractioned radiotherapy, external beam radiotherapy plus stereotactic radiosurgery or brachytherapy boost, and intensity modulated radiation therapy failed to improve the results of the treatment of these patients. Concomitant chemoradiotherapy has just obtained a new success in the treatment of glioblastoma. The addition of temozolomide to radiotherapy resulted in a statistically significant survival benefit with minimal acute additional toxicity. The challenge remains to improve clinical outcomes further, and some new research pathways are open.

Radiosurgery in the Treatment of Malignant Gliomas: The University of Florida Experience

OBJECTIVE:

To review a single-institution's 12-year experience of treating malignant gliomas with linear accelerator-based radiosurgery.

METHODS:

One hundred patients were treated for malignant gliomas at the University of Florida between May 1, 1989, and June 12, 2002. Patient variables were entered into a radiosurgery database in a prospective manner. The endpoint of the study was length of survival from the time of diagnosis. The minimum length of follow-up was 18 months or until death. In an attempt to control for selection bias, we used the Radiation Oncology Therapy Group's (RTOG) recursive partitioning categories to compare survival in our group of radiosurgically boosted patients with the RTOG historical database.

RESULTS:

Recursive partitioning analysis classification was significantly associated with survival. Compared with historical controls, this cohort of patients demonstrated a decreased survival for recursive partitioning analysis Class I and II patients, similar survival for Class III and IV patients, and increased median survival for Class V patients. Other variables demonstrating a statistically significant impact on survival were eloquent location and recurrent disease.

CONCLUSION:

The results of this study and those of RTOG 93-05 suggest that the reported benefit of upfront radiosurgical boost for malignant gliomas is the result of selection bias. The possibility remains that radiosurgical boost is of benefit in recurrent tumors, especially those in RTOG Class V.

Anaplastic astrocytoma: diagnosis, prognosis, and management

The designation of a tumor as anaplastic astrocytoma (AA) reflects a distinct histologic classification of malignant glioma characterized by an abundance of pleomorphic astrocytes with evidence of mitosis. Although these tumors are malignant, they have a better prognosis and a higher likelihood of response to treatment than glioblastoma. Despite advances in brain tumor imaging, making an accurate diagnosis requires the evaluation of tumor tissue and is essential for treatment planning. Currently, most patients undergo maximal surgical debulking of tumor followed by external beam radiation, often with subsequent adjuvant chemotherapy. However, despite the use of these treatment modalities, most tumors recur within a few years and these recurrent tumors are more refractory to subsequent therapies. This review examines the diagnosis, prognosis, and treatment of AAs. Ongoing clinical research investigations are also summarized, reflecting advances in our knowledge of the molecular pathogenesis of these tumors and providing hope for significant improvements in patient outcomes.

Does Stereotactic Eligibility for the Treatment of Glioblastoma Cause Selection Bias in Randomized Studies?

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the potential selection bias using stereotactic eligibility as a criteria for participation in studies of glioblastoma multiforme. Radiation Therapy Oncology Group (RTOG) 90-06 comparing 60 Gy in 30 fractions with BCNU and 72 Gy in 60 fractions with BCNU was analyzed based on eligibility criteria used to enter patients on RTOG 93-05 using a stereotactic boost for patients with glioblastoma. Five hundred nine patients with histopathologically confirmed glioblastoma multiforme were analyzed; of these, 137 met criteria for 93-05 and 372 did not. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was used to evaluate for differences. The RPA distribution in stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS)-eligible and -ineligible patients was similar. The median survival for RPA class 3 SRS-eligible patients was 1.4 years and -ineligible patients 1.4 years. For RPA class 4, the median survival was 1.0 years for eligible patients and 0.9 years for ineligible patients (P = 0.0421). For class 5 patients, the median survival was 8.3 months versus 7.2 months (P = 0.09). RPA class 6 patients had a median survival of 1.7 months versus 2.7 months for ineligible patients (P = 0.199). By analyzing previously randomized patients in a study not using a stereotactic boost, there does not appear to be a survival benefit for those patients who fit the criteria for consideration of a stereotactic boost in patients with glioblastoma multiforme.

An inflatable balloon catheter and liquid 125I radiation source (GliaSite Radiation Therapy System) for treatment of recurrent malignant glioma: multicenter safety and feasibility trial

OBJECT

In this study the authors evaluated the safety and performance of the GliaSite Radiation Therapy System (RTS) in patients with recurrent malignant brain tumors who were undergoing tumor resection.

METHODS

The GliaSite is an inflatable balloon catheter that is placed in the resection cavity at the time of tumor debulking. Low-dose-rate radiation is delivered with an aqueous solution of organically bound iodine-125 (lotrex [sodium 3-(125I)-iodo-4-hydroxybenzenesulfonate]), which are temporarily introduced into the balloon portion of the device via a subcutaneous port. Adults with recurrent malignant glioma underwent resection and GliaSite implantation. One to 2 weeks later, the device was filled with Iotrex for 3 to 6 days, following which the device was explanted. Twenty-one patients with recurrent high-grade astrocytomas were enrolled in the study and received radiation therapy. There were two end points: 1) successful implantation and delivery of brachytherapy; and 2) safety of the device. Implantation of the device, delivery of radiation, and the explantation procedure were well tolerated. At least 40 to 60 Gy was delivered to all tissues within the target volume. There were no serious adverse device-related events during brachytherapy. One patient had a pseudomeningocele, one patient had a wound infection, and three patients had meningitis (one bacterial, one chemical, and one aseptic). No symptomatic radiation necrosis was identified during 21.8 patient-years of follow up. The median survival of previously treated patients was 12.7 months (95% confidence interval 6.9-15.3 months).

CONCLUSIONS

The GliaSite RTS performs safely and efficiently. It delivers a readily quantifiable dose of radiation to tissue at the highest risk for tumor recurrence.

Role of radiation therapy and radiosurgery in glioblastoma multiforme

Randomized trials have supported a role for radiation therapy in the initial management of Glioblastoma Multiforme (GBM) for over twenty-five years. Although technological advances in imaging and three-dimensional treatment planning have reduced the toxicity for patients and have allowed safe radiation dose escalation, unfortunately they have not produced a correspondingly dramatic improvement in overall survival. The dose of 60 Gy partial brain RT remains the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed GBM. Recently completed randomized trials of brachytherapy and radiosurgery do not support these modalities in the initial management of GBM, but these and other focal RT techniques such as intensity modulated radiation therapy enable safe retreatment in selected patients. Future studies will need to explore radiation biologic response modification and radiosensitization through targeted therapies.

Brachytherapy of glioblastoma recurring in previously irradiated territory: predictive value of tumor volume

PURPOSE

To evaluate the impact of tumor volume on survival of patients reirradiated with (192)Ir for recurrent glioblastoma.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Between 1993 and 1997, 42 patients with recurrent glioblastomas (29 males and 13 females, age 18-69 years, median age 49) were treated with (192)Ir implantation. Previous treatments included surgery, external beam radiotherapy, and chemotherapy. Maximum diameter of the recurrent tumor was 1.2-10.1 cm (median: 5.7 cm) and tumor volume was 1.6-122 cm(3) (median: 23 cm(3)). Karnofsky performance status score was 50-100 (median: 80). Brachytherapy dose was 40-60 Gy.

RESULTS

Probability of overall survival was 80% at 6 months, 48% at 1 year, and 11% at 2 years. Median survival was 50 weeks. Univariate analysis showed that both tumor volume (T < or T > or = 30 cm(3)) and Karnofsky performance status score were significant predictors of survival. Multivariate analysis showed that smaller tumor volumes were associated with a higher probability of survival (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSION

Tumor volume less than 30 cm(3) was associated with a higher probability of, and quality of, survival than larger lesions for patients reirradiated by brachytherapy for recurrent glioblastoma.

Outpatient craniotomy for brain tumor: a pilot feasibility study in 46 patients

BACKGROUND

Since 1991 the author has routinely performed awake craniotomy for intra-axial brain tumors with low complication rate and low resource utilization. In late 1996 a pilot study was initiated to assess the feasibility of performing craniotomy for tumor resection as an outpatient procedure.

METHODS

A rigorous protocol was developed and adhered to, based around the patient's arrival at hospital at 6:00 a.m, undergoing image-guided awake craniotomy with cortical mapping, and being discharged by 6:00 p.m.

RESULTS

During the 48 month period from December 1996 to December 2000, 245 awake craniotomies were performed and of those, 46 patients were entered into the outpatient craniotomy protocol. Pathology in the 46 intent-to-treat group was: 21 metastasis, 19 glioma, and six miscellaneous. Four patients required conversion to inpatients and one patient was readmitted later the same evening due to headache. Thus 41/46 patients successfully completed the protocol (89%). There were five complications in the 46 intent-to-treat group (10.9%).

CONCLUSIONS

Outpatient craniotomy for brain tumor is a feasible option which appears safe and effective for selected patients. Besides being resource-friendly, the procedure may be psychologically less traumatic to patients than standard craniotomy for brain tumor. Proper prospective studies including satisfaction surveys would help resolve these issues and will be the next step.

The role of brachytherapy for palliation

The goal of palliative radiation is to alleviate symptoms in a short amount of time and maintain an optimal functional and quality-of-life level while minimizing toxicity and patient inconvenience. Despite advances in multimodality antineoplastic therapies, failure to control the tumor at its primary site frustratingly remains the predominant source of morbidity and mortality in many patients with cancer. Escalation of doses of radiation using external beam irradiation has been shown to improve local tumor control, but limits are imposed by the tolerance of normal surrounding structures. The highly conformal nature of brachytherapy enables the radiation oncologist to accomplish safe escalation of radiation doses to the tumor while minimizing doses to normal surrounding structures. Thus, by enhancing the potential for local control, brachytherapy used alone or as a supplement to external beam radiation therapy retains a significant and important role in achieving the goals of palliation. Proper patient selection, excellent technique, and adherence to implant rules will minimize the risk of complications. The advantages realized with the use of brachytherapy include good patient tolerance, short treatment time, and high rates of sustained palliation. This article reviews various aspects of palliative brachytherapy, including patient selection criteria, implant techniques, treatment planning, dose and fractionation schedules, results, and complications of treatment. Tumors of the head and neck, trachea and bronchi, esophagus, biliary tract, and brain, all in which local failure represents the predominant cause of morbidity and mortality, are highlighted.

Permanent iodine-125 interstitial implants for the treatment of recurrent glioblastoma multiforme

OBJECTIVE

Brachytherapy with temporary implants may prolong survival in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), but it is associated with relatively high costs and morbidity. This study reports the time to progression and survival after permanent implantation of iodine-125 seeds for recurrent GBM and examines factors predictive of outcome.

METHODS

Forty patients with recurrent GBM were treated with maximal resection plus permanent placement of iodine-125 seeds into the tumor bed. A total dose of 120 to 160 Gy was administered, and patients were followed up with magnetic resonance imaging scans every 2 to 3 months.

RESULTS

Actuarial survival from the time of implantation was 47 weeks, with 7 of 40 patients still alive at a median of 59 weeks after implantation. Survival was significantly better for patients younger than 60 years, and a trend for longer survival was demonstrated with gross total resection and tumors with a low MIB-1 (a nuclear antigen present in all cell cycles of proliferating cells) staining index. Median time to progression was 25 weeks and, on multivariate analysis, was favorably influenced by gross total resection and patient age younger than 60 years. After implantation, 27 of 30 patients with failure had a local component to the failure. No patient developed symptoms attributable to radiation necrosis or injury.

CONCLUSION

Permanent iodine-125 implants for recurrent GBM result in survival comparable with that described in previous reports on temporary implants, but with less morbidity. Results are most favorable for patients who are younger than 60 years, and who undergo gross total resection. Despite this aggressive treatment, most patients die as a consequence of locally recurrent disease.

A phase 1-2 clinical trial of gene therapy for recurrent glioblastoma multiforme by tumor transduction with the herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene followed by ganciclovir. GLI328 European-Canadian Study Group

This study has investigated the effects of herpes simplex thymidine kinase gene (HSV-tk) transfer followed by ganciclovir treatment as adjuvant gene therapy to surgical resection in patients with recurrent glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). The study was open and single-arm, and aimed at assessing the feasibility and safety of the technique and indications of antitumor activity. In 48 patients a suspension of retroviral vector-producing cells (VPCs) was administered by intracerebral injection immediately after tumor resection. Intravenous ganciclovir was infused daily 14 to 27 days after surgery. Patients were monitored for adverse events and for life by regular biosafety assaying. Tumor changes were monitored by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Reflux during injection was a frequent occurrence but serious adverse events during the treatment period (days 1-27) were few and of a nature not unexpected in this population. One patient experienced transient neurological disorders associated with postganciclovir MRI enhancement. There was no evidence of replication-competent retrovirus in peripheral blood leukocytes or in tissue samples of reresection or autopsy. Vector DNA was shown in the leukocytes of some patients but not in autopsy gonadal samples. The median survival time was 8.6 months, and the 12-month survival rate was 13 of 48 (27%). On MRI studies, tumor recurrence was absent in seven patients for at least 6 months and for at least 12 months in two patients, one of whom remains recurrence free at more than 24 months. Treatment-characteristic images of injection tracks and intracavity hemoglobin were apparent. In conclusion, the gene therapy is feasible and appears to be satisfactorily safe as an adjuvant to the surgical resection of recurrent GBM, but any benefit appears to be marginal. Investigation of the precise effectiveness of this gene therapy requires prospective, controlled studies.

Brachytherapy for brain tumor

Brachytherapy delivers high doses of radiation to brain tumors while sparing normal surrounding tissue. It may be used as a primary treatment, an adjuvant treatment, or as therapy for recurrence of some malignant gliomas, low-grade astrocytomas, meningiomas, metastases, and pediatric brain tumors. Each of the three principal types of brachytherapy (high dose rate, low dose rate, and intracavitary) has advantages and disadvantages. Combining brachytherapy with another modality, such as hyperthermia, may improve results. Although radiosurgery is supplanting brachytherapy for many indications, brachytherapy remains a viable option. This article discusses the radiobiology, procedures, clinical applications, and outcomes of brachytherapy in managing brain tumors.

A phase I dose escalation study of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy as salvage therapy for persistent or recurrent malignant glioma

PURPOSE

A phase I dose escalation of hypofractionated stereotactic radiotherapy (H-SRT) in recurrent or persistent malignant gliomas as a means of increasing the biologically effective dose and decreasing the high rate of reoperation due to toxicity associated with single-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) and brachytherapy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

From November 1994 to September 1996, 25 lesions in 20 patients with clinical and/or imaging evidence of malignant glioma persistence or recurrence received salvage H-SRT. Nineteen patients at the time of initial diagnosis had glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and one patient had an anaplastic astrocytoma. All of these patients with tumor persistence or recurrence had received initial fractionated radiation therapy (RT) with a mean and median dose of 60 Gy (44.0-72.0 Gy). The median time from completion of initial RT to H-SRT was 3.1 months (0.7-45.5 months). Salvage H-SRT was delivered using daily 3.0-3.5 Gy fractions (fxs). Three different total dose levels were sequentially evaluated: 24.0 Gy/3.0 Gy fxs (five lesions), 30.0 Gy/3.0 Gy fxs (10 lesions), and 35.0 Gy/3.5 Gy fxs (nine lesions). Median treated tumor volume measured 12.66 cc (0.89-47.5 cc). The median ratio of prescription volume to tumor volume was 2.8 (1.4-5.0). Toxicity was judged by RTOG criteria. Response was determined by clinical neurologic improvement, a decrease in steroid dose without clinical deterioration, and/or radiologic imaging.

RESULTS

No grade 3 toxicities were observed and no reoperation due to toxicity was required. At the time of analysis, 13 of 20 patients had died. The median survival time from the completion of H-SRT is 10.5 months with a 1-year survival rate of 20%. Neurological improvement was found in 45% of patients. Decreased steroid requirements occurred in 60% of patients. Minor imaging response was noted in 22% of patients. Using Fisher's exact test, response of any kind correlated strongly to total dose (p = 0.0056). None of six lesions treated with 21 Gy or 24 Gy responded, whereas there was a 79% response rate among the 19 lesions treated with 30 or 35 Gy. Tumor volumes < or =20 cc were associated with a higher likelihood of response (p = 0.053).

CONCLUSIONS

H-SRT used in this cohort of previously irradiated patients with malignant glioma was not associated with the need for reoperation due to toxicity or grade 3 toxicity. This low toxicity profile and encouraging H-SRT dose-related response outcome justifies further evaluation and dose escalation.

Dosimetric properties of a novel brachytherapy balloon applicator for the treatment of malignant brain-tumor resection-cavity margins

PURPOSE

This paper characterizes the dosimetric properties of a novel balloon brachytherapy applicator for the treatment of the tissue surrounding the resection cavity of a malignant brain tumor.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The applicator consists of an inflatable silicone balloon reservoir attached to a positionable catheter that is intraoperatively implanted into the resection cavity and postoperatively filled with a liquid radionuclide solution. A simple dosimetric model, valid in homogeneous media and based on results from Monte Carlo photon-transport simulations, was used to determine the dosimetric characteristics of spherical geometry balloons filled with photon-emitting radionuclide solutions. Fractional depth-dose (FDD) profiles, along with activity densities, and total activities needed to achieve specified dose rates were studied as a function of photon energy and source-containment geometry. Dose-volume histograms (DVHs) were calculated to compare idealized balloon-applicator treatments to conventional 125I seed volume implants.

RESULTS

For achievable activity densities and total activities, classical low dose rate (LDR) treatments of residual disease at distances of up to 1 cm from the resection cavity wall are possible with balloon applicators having radii between 0.5 cm and 2.5 cm. The dose penetration of these applicators increases approximately linearly with balloon radius. The FDD profile can be made significantly more or less penetrating by combining selection of radionuclide with source-geometry manipulation. Comparisons with 125I seed-implant DVHs show that the applicator can provide a more conformal therapy with no target tissue underdosing, less target tissue overdosing, and no healthy tissue "hot spots;" however, more healthy tissue volume receives a dose of the prescribed dosage or less.

CONCLUSIONS

This device, when filled with 125I solution, is suitable for classical LDR treatments and may be preferable to 125I interstitial-seed implants in several respects. Manipulation of the dosimetric properties of the device can improve its characteristics for brain tumor treatment and may make it suitable for boosting the lumpectomy margins in conservative breast cancer treatment.

Randomized study of brachytherapy in the initial management of patients with malignant astrocytoma

PURPOSE

A randomized study was undertaken to assess the role of brachytherapy as a boost to external beam radiation therapy in the initial management of patients with malignant astrocytomas.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Inclusion criteria included the following: biopsy-proven supratentorial malignant astrocytoma of brain < or =6 cm in size, not crossing midline or involving corpus callosum, age 18-70, Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) > or =70. Patients were randomized to external radiation therapy only delivering 50 Gray (Gy) in 25 fractions over 5 weeks or external radiation therapy plus a temporary stereotactic iodine-125 implants delivering a minimum peripheral tumor dose of 60 Gy. Patients were stratified to age < or =50 or >50, and KPS > or =90 or < or =80.

RESULTS

There were 140 patients randomized between 1986 and 1996, 71 to the implant arm and 69 to external irradiation only. Pathologically 125 patients had necrosis noted in their tumor specimen. Factors associated with improved survival in univariate analysis were age < or =50, KPS > or =90, chemotherapy at recurrence, and reoperation at the original tumor site. The Cox proportional hazards model revealed the following significant factors: treatment at recurrence (chemotherapy or reoperation) with a relative risk (RR) of 0.6 (p = 0.004) and KPS > or =90 with a RR 0.6 (p = 0.007). Randomization to the implant arm was associated with a RR of 0.7 (p = 0.07). Median survival for patients randomized to brachytherapy or not were 13.8 vs. 13.2 months, respectively, p = 0.49.

CONCLUSIONS

We conclude that stereotactic radiation implants have not demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in survival in the initial management of patients with malignant astrocytoma.

Interstitial brachytherapy for malignant brain tumors

For nearly 20 years, interstitial brachytherapy has been used as adjuvant treatment for malignant brain tumors in both prospective clinical trials and as part of standard therapy. Numerous publications analyzing the results of this treatment seem to indicate an improvement in median survival for highly selected patients. Some newly diagnosed glioblastoma multiforme, recurrent malignant glioma, brain metastases and possibly low grade gliomas seem to benefit. While Iodine-125 (I-125) remains the most popular radionuclide for brachytherapy, there is a recent move away from temporary high-activity implants to permanent low-activity implants. This review article will concentrate on the results from the University of California, San Francisco, as well as recent series published since 1990. In spite of the increased availability of radiosurgery, interstitial brachytherapy still has a place in the management of these difficult tumors.

A technique for accurate planning of stereotactic brain implants prior to head ring fixation

PURPOSE

A two-step procedure is described for accurate planning of stereotactic brain implants prior to head-ring fixation.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Approximately 2 weeks prior to implant a CT scan without the head ring is performed for treatment-planning purposes. An entry point and a reference point, both marked with barium and later tattooed, facilitate planning and permit correlation of the images with a later CT scan. A plan is generated using a conventional treatment-planning system to determine the number and activity of I-125 seeds required and the position of each catheter. I-125 seed anisotropy is taken into account by means of a modification to the treatment planning program. On the day of the implant a second CT scan is performed with the head ring affixed to the skull and with the same points marked as in the previous scan. The planned catheter coordinates are then mapped into the coordinate system of the second CT scan by means of a manual translational correction and a computer-calculated rotational correction derived from the reference point coordinates in the two scans.

RESULTS

The rotational correction algorithm was verified experimentally in a Rando phantom before it was used clinically. For analysis of the results with individual patients a third CT scan is performed 1 day following the implant and is used for calculating the final dosimetry.

CONCLUSION

The technique that is described has two important advantages: 1) the number and activity of seeds required can be accurately determined in advance; and 2) sufficient time is allowed to derive the best possible plan.

The protective effect of dexamethasone against radiation damage induced by interstitial irradiation in normal monkey brain

OBJECTIVE

The protective effect of dexamethasone against radiation damage is unclear. We examined the effect of early treatment of high-dose dexamethasone on iridium-192-induced damage to normal brain tissue.

METHODS

Brain damage induced by interstitial irradiation with iridium-192 was evaluated with sequential magnetic resonance imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy in 11 adult monkeys, with or without short-term high-dose dexamethasone treatment. Dexamethasone (1 mg/kg of body weight/d) was administered intramuscularly to five irradiated animals every 24 hours, beginning 2 days before and ending 7 days after irradiation. Magnetic resonance imaging and proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy were performed 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after irradiation.

RESULTS

Magnetic resonance imaging performed 1 week after irradiation revealed marked edema in five nontreated animals. In dexamethasone-treated animals, the volume of edema was reduced significantly, compared to that of nontreated animals, 1 week and 1 month after irradiation. The volume of ring enhancement in dexamethasone-treated animals was also reduced significantly, compared to that of nontreated animals, 3 months after the irradiation. Proton magnetic resonance spectroscopy spectra revealed that N-acetylaspartate and choline peaks were reduced 1 week after irradiation in both groups. However, there were no statistically significant differences between the two groups at any time points.

CONCLUSION

These results suggest that dexamethasone treatment may have an antiedema effect at an early stage and may modify subsequent development of vascular and inflammatory changes but may have no effect of preventing radiation-induced necrosis and the reduction of N-acetylaspartate after brachytherapy.

Interstitial brachytherapy procedures for brain tumors

Promising results have been obtained using brachytherapy in the treatment of brain tumors. Very low-dose rate brachytherapy (60-100 Gy given at 0.05-0.10 Gy/h) has been used for low-grade gliomas, resulting in 5- and 10-year survival probabilities of 85% and 83% for pilocytic astrocytomas and 61% and 51% for grade II astrocytomas. Only 2.6% of patients had symptomatic radiation necrosis. For faster-growing high-grade gliomas, temporary implants delivering about 60 Gy at 0.40-0.60 Gy/h are generally used. The largest series have reported median survival times of 12-13 months after brachytherapy for recurrent malignant gliomas and 18-19 months after diagnosis of primary glioblastomas treated with external beam radiotherapy and brachytherapy boost. A recent prospective, randomized trial demonstrated significantly improved survival for high-grade glioma patients who had brachytherapy boost. However, over 50% of patients who undergo brachytherapy for malignant gliomas require reoperation for tumor progression and/or radiation necrosis. Strategies are under development to improve local control without increasing radiation toxicity.

Effects of iodine-125 brachytherapy on the proliferative capacity and histopathological features of glioblastoma recurring after initial therapy

OBJECTIVE

To determine the effect of initial therapy (surgery and external beam radiation) on the proliferative capacity of glioblastoma and whether adjunctive high focused doses of radiation therapy can further reduce the proliferative capacity of the tumor. This would provide a rationale for attempting to further control local tumor growth with the different forms of high-dose focused radiation available.

METHODS

Patients with glioblastoma were initially treated within a randomized, controlled study with or without iodine-125 (125 I) brachytherapy after initial surgical resection and external beam radiation (50 Gy in 25 fractions). Specimens from 24 consecutive patients later reoperated for "recurrence" were used to determine the effects of 125 I brachytherapy on the histological features and proliferating cell nuclear antigen index of the tumor tissue.

RESULTS

125 I brachytherapy reduced histological features prognostic for tumor progression, i.e., cellularity, pleomorphism, vessel hyperplasia, and degree of mitosis (P < 0.05). The degree of mitosis (marker for the mitotic or "M" phase) and proliferating cell nuclear antigen index (market for the late G1 and S phase) provide complementary data on the cell kinetics of the tumor. Proliferating cell nuclear antigen immunostaining was lower in the 125 I brachytherapy group (34.6 +/- 8.2%, mean +/- standard error) compared with the control nonimplant group (68.2 +/- 3.5%). 125 I brachytherapy produced a dramatic reduction in mitotic figures (mean histological score = 0.0 +/- 0.0).

CONCLUSION

Adjunctive treatment of glioblastoma with discrete high doses of radiation therapy delivered by 125 I brachytherapy allows further control of the proliferative capacity of the tumor.

Tirilazad does not protect rat brain from brachytherapy-induced injury

BACKGROUND

Acute and chronic brain injury are common sequelae of high-dose focused radiation, as in radiosurgery and brachytherapy. Development of protectors of radiation injury, which would work in brain but not in tumor, would help enhance the therapeutic ratio of focused-radiation therapy.

METHODS

Radiation protection by a clinically available 21-aminosteroid, Tirilazad, was studied in a rat brain brachytherapy model, both in tumor and non-tumor bearing animals. For the tumor model, 9L Glioma/SF line cells were implanted stereotactically into the right frontal lobe of F-344 rats and grew to a sphere of 5.0-mm diameter after 12 days. Animals received a standard brachytherapy dose of 80 Gy to a 5.5-mm radius volume administered by a high-activity removable iodine-125 seed. Radiation damage was evaluated 24 hours after removal of the seeds in all animals and again at 3 months in non-tumor-bearing animals, by T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced and T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on a 1.5-T unit. Treated animals received Tirilazad 5 mg/kg intravenously 15 minutes prior to implant, 1 hour after implant, every 6 hours for the duration of the implant, and for 24 hours after removal of the seed. Control animals were administered vehicle only.

RESULTS

In both non-tumor-bearing and tumor-bearing rats, no difference in the volume of lesions on enhanced T1 or T2 MRI was seen between the Tirilazad-treated and control groups. In the non-tumor-bearing rats, volume of both T1 enhanced and T2 MRI lesions was significantly reduced at 3 months compared to the values at 24 hours.

CONCLUSIONS

In the present model, Tirilazad failed to reduce the volume of radiation brain injury from brachytherapy as seen on MRI, studied acutely in tumor-bearing and non-tumor-bearing animals and also at 3 months in non-tumor-bearing rats.

Brachytherapy for recurrent single brain metastasis

Of 112 stereotactic high-activity iodine-125 implants for malignant brain tumors done as of July 1, 1994, ten have been done for recurrent single brain metastasis and constitute the study group described herein. All patients had initially undergone craniotomy for tumor resection followed by fractionated external beam whole brain radiation and recurred at the same site in the brain. The interval between initial cancer therapy and occurrence of the brain metastasis was 13-156 weeks (median: 63 weeks). The interval between initial treatment of the brain metastasis and its recurrence treated with brachytherapy was 13-69 weeks (median: 35 weeks). Minimum brachytherapy dose administered was 70 Gy at a median dose rate of 67 cGy/hour. Eight patients have died. Two died suddenly at 2 and 13 weeks post-implant of presumed pulmonary embolus. Five died of recurrence of the brain metastasis at 20, 39, 52, 103, and 143 weeks post-implant, and one died of systemic metastases at 40 weeks post-implant. Two patients remain alive 183 and 324 weeks post-implant. High-activity iodine-125 brachytherapy appears to be of benefit for selected patients with recurrent single brain metastasis but larger, and preferably randomized studies are needed.